CTE Data Works for Arizona

NACTEI PORTLAND MAY 16, 2012

HELEN BOOTSMACAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

CTE Data Works for Arizona

Arizona Department of Education Career and Technical Education

Why Collect Data?

U.S. Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan Our goal here is not data, our goal is to change behavior and

get better outcomes.

Students First, CEO Michelle RheeWe've gotten to a point where states are collecting this data,

but are they using it?

Kentucky Commissioner of Education, Terry HollidayIf you don't turn the data into action, it won't matter.

Data Quality Campaign National Data Summit

January 18, 2012


Overview

Districts Use Online PM Reports District level of performance High school by CTE program Student subgroups

State Uses PM Data Districts Use CTE Assessment System Reports

Student results CTE teachers Reports to District Administrators State Data Reports Federal Data Reports


Data is Valuable


Accurate Comparable

Timely

Transparent Actionable

Accurate SAIS Numbers

Challenges withSAIS Dependency

District SIS staff and District Registrar ensure CTE student SAIS records are correct for 2012 CTE Participants and Concentrators


Add new student record: Choose the program, then add the student’s SAIS ID and birthdate. Click on Next. All student demographic data is pulled into PM from SAIS.


Obtain Student Data From SAIS

Internet Data Submission Application

Concentrator PM data CTE Assessment System

SAIS Links


District Level of Performance


High School Program Performance


PM Graph by District/School/Program

Tec

PM Results for All Student Groups

District Monitoring Reports Use PM Data

Calculate and compare Access for all student groups including SP categories

Districts use Concentrator Reports to determine success for all student groups

Monitoring Document requires districts define the problem and benchmark the solution


Performance Measures Improvement Plan for 2011-12The core indicator(s) of performance for which the district failed to meet the 90 percent threshold:

Improvement Plans Use PM Data

PerformanceMeasure

Circle # of Consecutive YearsFailed to Meet this Measure

2010-11 DistrictLevel of

Performance

2010-11 Arizona StateLevel of Performance (SALP)

90% of the2010-11 SALP

District Target to ReduceGap between District Level of

Performance and SALP in 2011-12

2S1 1 2 3 50.00% 67.00% 60.30% 6.70%

Action Steps ResponsiblePerson(s)

Timeline forCompletion

Mid-Year Status

Make teachers aware of this disparity through data review. Focus instruction on attaining these skills.

Respective CTE Teacher & CTE Counselor

May, 2012 On going

Identify students through AIMS data who need training in test-taking skills and strategies.

Respective CTE Teachers & CTE Counselor

May, 2012 On going

In study skills class, the aforementioned students will participate in a semester long study skills class. These students will be given items to develop test-taking skills and improve their performance.

CHS Counselors and CTE Teaching staff

May, 2012 On going

During CHS ‘7th hour’ (students needing interventions) test-taking strategies are being taught w/ student practice on general test items.

CHS Staff May, 2012 On going

Basic Grant Objectives Use PM Data

Secondary Perkins Addendum for Performance MeasuresPM Program/Site

(all or list Applicable)

Measureable Objective SMART, Objective=Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results-Oriented, &

Timely

Expenditure Item (Provide details on application budget

pages)

USFR Expenditure

Category

Estimated Expenditure

Amount

Justification

2S1 CulinaryArts

Auto Tech

By March 1, 2012, these CTE teachers will use the Standards and Measurement Criteria Report for each fall test taker as a diagnostic tool to improve individual skill attainment as evidenced by personalized measurable goals and benchmarks.

Teacher Participation in Summer CTE Conference and other CTE professional development activities to strengthen and improve their CTE programs in all areas of SALP

2200/63002200/6500

1000/6100

1000/6200

$7,5005,981.43

$1,500.00

$120.00

Teachers will analyze individual student data in order to revise teaching strategies and lesson plans to improve assessment scores for 2S1. Substitutes for CTE teachers while out for professional development of $1,500 plus benefits at 8%

Other Uses for PM Data

Submit to EDEN/EdFacts for CAR

Provide to external requests

Time article by Joe Klein

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2113794,00.html


CTE Assessment System

State Mandate Arizona Joint Technological District (JTED) 2006 legislation required

that CTE programs lead to industry certification bySpring 2008.

Carl D. Perkins Act of 2006 legislation CTE programs at secondary and postsecondary levels lead to

industry certification.

Business and Industry demands Skilled workforce

In Partnership with University of Arizona

Arizona Department of Education in partnership with University of Arizona

AZ Skill Standards Assessment System

Provides Online Practice and Final end-of-program assessments

Based on Industry-validated technical knowledge/skills

Evidence of technical skill attainment

Certification/documentation


Decision Making Bodies for Assessment System

Arizona Skill Standards Commission

Stakeholders Committee

Industry Associations

Validation Committees

Item Development Committees


Student Count

3,153 8,409 15,114 15,807 17,505

Spring‘08

Spring‘09

Spring‘10

Spring‘11

Spring‘12

Increasing Student Participation in CTE

Assessments



Teachers receive an email with Student Test Results upon completion of assessments.

Students can print or email test results immediately following completion of an assessments.

Districts and ADE utilize student data and reports.

CTE Assessment Data

Data Reports to CTE Students

Practice Test Results Print/ Send to email address Use for guided study prior to Final Test

Final Test Results Print / Send to email address Students receive Certificate and Transcript as

documentation of industry skill attainment


What would you like to do with this report?

Send to Email: My email address is Send This Report To EmailPrint: Click here to Print

Attending Alpine High School – Date of Test 2/16/2010

EDUCATION PROFESSIONS - SAMPLE

Standard 1.0-EXAMINE THE ROLE OF THE EDUCATION INDUSTRY IN THE ECONOMY

Correct Incorrect % Correct

1.1 Explain the role of education in the economy: local, state, national, and international

1 0 100%

1.2 Recognize the factors that contribute to an effective school

1 0 100%

1.3 Compare/contrast the financial advantages/ disadvantages of public, charter, and private educational institutions

1 1 50%

Standard 2.0-RECONGIZE THE FINANCIAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF A SHOOL DISTRICT

2.1 Identify business and financial functions of an educational institution

2 0 100%

2.2 Explain how taxes impact the school district’s ability to meet objectives and state and federal mandates

1 1 50%

Total: 6 2 66%


CTE StudentANY HIGH SCHOOL

FIRE SERVICESpring 2012

Registration Data Fields

SAIS number Birth Date School of Residence and School of Attendance Gender and Special Populations Grade Level Program Assessment Program Completion StatusCTE Teacher email


Teachers Use Data Reports

Provide individual one-on-one guidance and instruction

Diagnose curriculum and instructional needs

Fosters collaboration

Recognize and celebrate success

Track longitudinal progress


Classroom Analysis by Gender/Male Measurement

Criteria


Classroom Analysis by Gender/Female Measurement

Criteria


Classroom Analysis by Scores Total Results Report

SAIS ID CIP

Points Correct

Points Possible

School of Residence CTDS Gender

Special Population Status

Grade Level

Program CompletionStatus

52.0300.0 81 109 70211262 F NO 12 Final52.0300.0 79 109 70211262 M HA 12 Final52.0300.0 75 109 70211262 M EC 12 Final52.0300.0 66 109 70211262 F NO 11 Final52.0300.0 60 109 70211262 M NO 12 Final52.0300.0 59 109 70211263 F LEP 12 Final52.0300.0 56 109 70211262 F NO 12 Final52.0300.0 45 109 70211262 M NO 12 Final52.0300.0 28 109 70211262 M NO 12 Final52.0300.0 26 109 70211262 F NO 11 Final


District Administrators Use Data Reports

Program analyses Teacher and school site data Disaggregated groups

CTE delivery systems Curriculum materials

Instructional methodology Mentor assignment

Recognition


JTED Reports to AZ Legislature

JLBC (Joint Legislative Budget Committee)

Student participation in assessments percentage by JTED

Number of students passing assessment by program

Number and percentage of students passing by JTED


Future Data System Development

New Arizona Workplace Employability Skills

Formative CTE assessments to address teacher evaluation


Contact

Arizona Department of EducationMark Hamilton Helen BootsmaDeputy Associate Superintendent and CTE Development and Innovation

DirectorCareer & Technical Education Arizona Department of EducationArizona Department of Education 1535 W Jefferson Street1535 W Jefferson Street Phoenix AZ 85007Phoenix AZ 85007 602-542-5963602-542-3437 [email protected]@azed.gov

University of ArizonaMargaret A. Mangini, Ed.D.Executive DirectorWorkforce Education Development OfficeUniversity of Arizona714 E Van BureanPhoenix AZ [email protected]


CTE DATA WORKS

FOR ARIZONA


CTE Data Works for Arizona

Documents

Transcript of CTE Data Works for Arizona