Croucher succession law reform update 2011

44
Succession Law Reform in New South Wales 2011 Update Professor Rosalind Croucher

Transcript of Croucher succession law reform update 2011

Page 1: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Succession Law Reformin New South Wales

2011 Update

Professor Rosalind Croucher

Page 2: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Wills

Page 3: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Dispensing power

• Is there a document?• Does the document

embody testamentary intentions?

• Did the deceased intend the document, without more, to be the will?

Page 4: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

RectificationRectify to carry out intentions where• there’s a clerical error• the will does not give effect to

‘instructions’

Succession Act s 27

Page 5: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

• Deceased intended to divide residue into six shares – one to Justin and his wife jointly, not additional one to Justin (7th share)

• Will rectified – six shares

Estate of Davis [2010] NSWSC 989

Rectification

Page 6: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Justin & Mrs Justin

Justin

E

D

C

B

A

Rectification

Justin & Mrs

Justin

E

DC

B

A

Page 7: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

“My home 11 Grevillea St”

Rectification

= ademption residue ????

Page 8: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Instructions?• solicitor’s note – “if house sold for

retirement unit, then residue to be divided”• “name down for Anglicare unit”• deceased wanted to benefit daughter

more than son

Rectification

Page 9: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

• new will prepared after sale:

“all of the monies which will be refunded from RSL Lifecare for the residency agreement that I am a party to for Villa 1”

• she died before signing new will• will rectified – gift caught new form

Estate of Tait; Vesco v Bannister [2010] NSWSC 1274

Rectification

Page 10: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Statutory wills

Page 11: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

The will is one that the incapable person:• would have made;• would be reasonably likely to have made

Succession Act s 22(b)

Statutory wills

Page 12: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

12

??????????????????????????

Statutory wills

nil capacity

lost capacity

Page 13: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Lost capacity: consider the person’s –• relationships• history• personality• size of the estate• previous wills

Re Fenwick [2009] NSWSC 530

Statutory wills

Page 14: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

What if there is no will?• don’t start with a presumption against

intestacy• but there’s probably some evidence to

satisfy the court that person intended, at some stage, to make a will

• if insufficient evidence then applicant fails

Re Fenwick [2009] NSWSC 530

Statutory wills

Page 15: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

‘[i]t is a serious matter for the Court to appropriate to itself the will-making power of the citizen’.

Re Will of Jane [2011] NSWSC 624, [84].

Statutory wills

Page 16: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Right to inspectIncludes:• anyone named in the will• beneficiaries• spouse, children or parents• next of kin• creditor

Succession Act s 54

Page 17: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Family Provision

Page 18: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Family Provision

Page 19: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

(a) the husband or wife

(b) de facto

(c) child

(d) former spouse

(e) sometime dependant

(f) close personal relationship

Succession Act s 57

Eligibility

Page 20: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Carers?• s 57(f) – ‘close personal relationship?• s 3(3) – living together, providing domestic

support and personal care• s 3(4) – not satisfied if

– for fee or reward– on behalf of an organisation

Eligibility

Page 21: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Adult children patterns:• the dutiful child rewarded under the will,

facing a claim by an estranged/undutiful child

• the needy child rewarded under the will facing a claim by siblings who are not needy

Family Provision

Page 22: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Family Provision

• $10,000 to Lynne• 40% to Michael• residue to Michael

and three sisters (not Lynne)

Rita’s

Andrew v Andrew [2011] NSWSC 115

Page 23: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Evaluating claimsKey messages:• it is not about re-writing wills• it is not about ‘fairness’ from a child’s

viewpoint• it is not about ‘equity’ between children• parents are still able to make judgments

about the worthiness of their children

Page 24: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Evaluating claims• a parent is not expected to provide

forever for children• a child who is still dependent may

have a continuing claim• the community may expect a parent to

provide a ‘buffer against contingencies’ for a child who falls on hard times – depends on size of estate and competing claims

Page 25: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

25

Gut instincts

Page 26: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Section 60 factors, include – • applicant’s contribution to estate or welfare

of the deceased (financial or otherwise)• deceased’s contribution to applicant• character and conduct of applicant• evidence of what testator wanted

Evaluating claims

Page 27: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

• What is the reason?• Needs of plaintiff, size of estate, other

claims?• Deceased is entitled to make no provision

for a child who treats their parents callously

Estrangement

Page 28: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Result• Estrangement not the fault of the

deceased – and over 35 years• Good relationship continued with other

children• Testator entitled to make little provision for

child who withholds support and love without justification

• Conduct and need inter-related

Page 29: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

PropertyNotional estate – Part 3.3• entering a prescribed transaction• timing• deeming

Page 30: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Eg – joint tenancy• = prescribed transaction – s 76(2)(b)• takes effect on death – s 77(3)• should it be deemed? – ss 78, 83

Property

Page 31: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Avoidance strategy?• give cash gifts – but note pension

impact • give away movables – deed of gift but

retain possession as custodian?• > 3 years if possible• provide reasons – to explain, if

needed

Property

Page 32: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Richard Pratt

Page 33: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Richard Pratt

Page 34: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Property

Pratt’s domicile

movablesimmovables

Page 35: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Property

movablesimmovables

movablesimmovables

movablesimmovables

testator’s domicile

Page 36: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Pratt’s propertyDid Pratt leave property in NSW?• no actual estate• notional estate claims over properties held

by companies – Pratt a director

Fiduciary duty

No notional estate

Page 37: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Capacity• difference from prior wills?• explanations for change?• inofficious?• need to take a cautious approach

Probate

Page 38: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Intestacy

Page 39: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Next of kinspouse

issue

parents

siblings

grandparents

aunts and uncles

Page 40: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Family tree …

Intestate BrotherSister

Mother Father Uncle

Grandfather Grandmother

Niece NephewChildren

FirstCousins

Gt-niece

First Cousinsonce removed

Gt-nephewGrandchildren

Gt Grandfather

Gt-Uncle

First Cousinsonce removed

Second Cousins

Gt Grandmother

Second Cousinsonce removed

Page 41: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Per stirpes…

IntestateBrotherSister

NieceNephew

Two

Gt-niece Gt-nephew

NephewOne

Page 42: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

• Siblings: two shares• Sister predeceased leaving surviving issue• Sister’s share: divided into two• Niece’s s share divided between her two

children• Nephew Two gets nothing

Per stirpes…

Page 43: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

Per stirpes…

IntestateBrother = 50%Sister’s share = 50%

Niece’s share = 25%

NephewTwo = 0%

Gt-niece= 12.5%

Gt-nephew= 12.5%

NephewOne = 25%

Page 44: Croucher   succession law reform update  2011

For further information on the Uniform Succession Laws

project• QLRC website –

www.qlrc.qld.gov.au • NSWLRC website –

www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lrc • ALRC papers and speeches –

www.alrc.gov.au