Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on...
-
Upload
rosemary-legates -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
1
Transcript of Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on...
![Page 1: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Cross Examination (CX) Debate
Overview
![Page 2: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Affirmative Case Structure
Topicality Founded on Definitions
Significance Walls (Harms) frame the
issue Plan/Solvency
Covers all harms Inherency
Inherent Barrier Advantages
Extras (bonus benefits)
![Page 3: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
CX Debate
Topicality
![Page 4: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Review
Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Significance Inherency Solvency Advantages
![Page 5: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Topicality
Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase alternative energy incentives in the United States.
Define each word Have definitions and standards for all
terms
![Page 6: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Example
![Page 7: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Set a Standard
Types Of Standards Legal definitions Bright line Framer’s intent Each word has a meaning
Make sure you have standards to support
![Page 8: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Check Your Sources
Possible Dictionaries Black ‘s Law
Dictionary Words and Phrases Webster’s New
World On-line Dictionaries
Webster’s New Collegiate
STAY AWAY FROM WIKIPEDIA
![Page 9: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Run To Government Documents
Government documents may prove each word has meaning
Example: PUBLIC HEALTH
ASSISTANCE
![Page 10: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Apply To Case
MAKE SURE YOUR DEFINITIONS FIT YOUR CASE BECAUSE THE NEGATIVE TEAM WILL PRESENT COUNTER DEFINTIONS
![Page 11: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Questions
?
![Page 12: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CX Debate
Significance
![Page 13: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Review
Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Significance Inherency Solvency Advantages
![Page 14: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Significance
Answers the Question: “What is the Harm in the Status Quo?”
Status Quo “The current situation, the problem that
the topic is seeking to repair” “The way things are now.”
(Debating Policies, p. 43)
![Page 15: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Significance
Harms are: Claims about what in the status quo is
bad Quantifiable or Unquantifiable:
Quantifiable: Perhaps 50 million people are currently malnourished.
Unquantifiable : Loss of freedom or unethical corporate behavior
Both quantifiable and unquantifiable harms are strong.
![Page 16: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Significance
Harm 1 - Title Subpoint A) – Tag Line
Citation Evidence (i.e., “Card”)
Subpoint B) – Tag Line Citation Evidence (i.e., “Card”)
Subpoint C) – Tag Line Citation Evidence (i.e., “Card”)
Tag Line 5-7 Word to Summary
Citation Author [Title]
OROrganization
Date URL (if applicable)
Rules of Evidence Whole sentences Underline key sentances
![Page 17: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Example
![Page 18: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
CX Debate
Inherency
![Page 19: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Review
Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Significance Inherency Solvency Advantages
![Page 20: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Inherency
Answers the Question: “What’s preventing your plan from
happening today (i.e. in the status quo)?”
Claim that the status quo will not be changed
As a result, harms will continue indefinitely
![Page 21: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Inherency
Inherency – Title Tag line
Citation Evidence
Tag line Citation Evidence
1 to 2 cards
Types of Inherency Structural
What is preventing your plan …. Attitudinal
Who is preventing your plan … Existential
No Infrastructure exists to solbe
![Page 22: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Example
![Page 23: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
CX Debate
Solvency
![Page 24: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Review
Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Significance Inherency Solvency Advantages
![Page 25: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The Plan
Is your proposed course of action to solve for the harms.
Written in your own words. Should be simple, straightforward,
and take you 30 seconds or so to read.
![Page 26: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
The Plan
Structure: Plank 1) Agent of Change
What agency will make the change? Plank 2)
What steps must go into implementing this change
Legislative changes Judicial decisions Executive agencies/ policy changes
![Page 27: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
The Plan
Structure: Plank XX) Funding
Where exactly is the money coming from Normal means Funding source – have evidence on how much and
from where Anticipate DAs
![Page 28: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The Plan
Structure: Planks XX) Enforcement
What agency will implement/enforce this change?
Normal means Executive department
“All speeches serve to clarify legislative intent”
![Page 29: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Example
![Page 30: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Solvency
The argument that your plan would work.
Responds to questions such as: Will the funding for the plan work out? Will the funding be sufficient? Will it solve the harms?
![Page 31: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Solvency
Where the rubber meets the road Plan-Meets-Need
Does the plan solve for all harms? Does the plan remove the Inherent
Barrier Beyond solvency for the problems, does
plan have any other net benefits/harms? Plan benefits = Advantages Plan harms = Disadvantages
Learn to anticipate likely Neg. DAs
![Page 32: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Example
![Page 33: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
CX Debate
Advantages
![Page 34: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Review
Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Significance Inherency Solvency Advantages
![Page 35: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Advantages
Link to plan A plank of the plan would result in
Advantage Not extra-topical
Stay within resolution Evidence based
Not solvency/Unique advantages (i.e. economic, efficiency, advances)
Have impacts (importance) Be able to weigh versus disadvantages
(DAs)
![Page 36: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Advantage Example
![Page 37: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
CX Debate
Final Case Requirements
![Page 38: Cross Examination (CX) Debate Overview. Affirmative Case Structure Topicality Topicality Founded on Definitions Founded on Definitions Significance Significance.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551b6f65550346d6338b4d82/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Final Case
Requirements Definitions Harm 1 Harm 2 Harm 3 Inherency Plan Solvency Advantage 1 Advantage 2
8:00 min. total In page protectors
in ½” black binder Time markers
printed on bottom of each page
2 Test Grades: Text Time