Cost Allocation: Joint Products and By-Products... Costs Example

54
16 - 1 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/F Cost Allocation: Joint Products and Byproducts Chapter 16

Transcript of Cost Allocation: Joint Products and By-Products... Costs Example

16 - 1©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Cost Allocation: Joint Productsand Byproducts

Chapter 16

16 - 2©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 1

Identify the splitoff point(s)in a joint-cost situation.

16 - 3©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Joint-Cost Basics

Joint productsJoint costs

Separable costs

Splitoff pointByproduct

16 - 4©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Joint-Cost Basics

Raw milk

Cream Liquid Skim

16 - 5©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Joint-Cost Basics

Coal

Gas Benzyl Tar

16 - 6©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 2

Distinguish joint productsfrom byproducts.

16 - 7©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Joint Products and Byproducts

Sales Value

High Low

Main ProductsJoint Products Byproducts

16 - 8©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 3

Explain why joint costs should beallocated to individual products.

16 - 9©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Why Allocate Joint Costs?

• to compute inventory cost and cost of goods sold• to determine cost reimbursement under contracts • for insurance settlement computations• for rate regulation• for litigation purposes

16 - 10©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 4

Allocate joint costs usingfour different methods.

16 - 11©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Approaches to AllocatingJoint Costs

Approach 2:Physical measure

Approach 1:Market based

Two basic ways to allocatejoint costs to products are:

16 - 12©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Approach 1: Market-based Data

Sales value at splitoff methodEstimated net realizable value (NRV) method

Constant gross-margin percentage NRV method

16 - 13©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating Joint Costs Example

10,000 units of A at aselling price of $10 = $100,000

10,500 units of B at aselling price of $30 = $315,000

11,500 units of C at aselling price of $20 = $230,00

Joint processingcost is $200,000

Splitoff point

16 - 14©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Allocating Joint Costs Example

A B C TotalSales Value $100,000 $315,000 $230,000 $645,000Allocation ofJoint Cost100 ÷ 645 31,008 315 ÷ 645 97,674230 ÷ 645 71,318

200,000Gross margin $ 68,992 $217,326 $158,682 $445,000

16 - 15©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Sales Value at SplitoffMethod Example

Assume all of the units producedof B and C were sold.

2,500 units of A (25%)remain in inventory.

What is the gross marginpercentage of each product?

16 - 16©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Sales Value at SplitoffMethod Example

Product A Revenues: 7,500 units × $10.00 $75,000Cost of goods sold:

Joint product costs $31,008Less ending inventory

$31,008 × 25% 7,752 23,256Gross margin $51,744

16 - 17©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Sales Value at SplitoffMethod Example

Product A:($75,000 – $ 23,256) ÷ $75,000 = 69%

Product B:($315,000 – $97,674) ÷ $315,000 = 69%

Product C:($230,000 – $71,318) ÷ $230,000 = 69%

16 - 18©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Estimated Net Realizable Value(NRV) Method Example

Assume that Oklahoma Company can processproducts A, B, and, C further into A1, B1, and C1.The new sales values after further processing are:

A1:10,000 × $12.00

= $120,000

B1:10,500 × $33.00

= $346,500

C1:11,500 × $21.00

= $241,500

16 - 19©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Estimated Net Realizable Value(NRV) Method Example

Additional processing (separable) costs are as follows:

A1: $35,000 B1: $46,500 C1: $51,500

What is the estimated net realizable value of eachproduct at the splitoff point?

16 - 20©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Estimated Net Realizable Value(NRV) Method Example

Product A1: $120,000 – $35,000 = $85,000Product B1: $346,500 – $46,500 = $300,000Product C1: $241,500 – $51,500 = $190,000

How much of the joint cost is allocatedto each product?

16 - 21©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Estimated Net Realizable Value(NRV) Method Example

To A1:85 ÷ 575 × $200,000 = $29,565

To B1:300 ÷ 575 × $200,000 = $104,348

To C1:190 ÷ 575 × $200,000 = $66,087

16 - 22©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Estimated Net Realizable Value(NRV) Method Example

Allocated Separable Inventory joint costs costs costs

A1 $ 29,565 $ 35,000 $ 64,565B1 104,348 46,500 150,848C1 66,087 51,500 117,587Total $200,000 $133,000 $333,000

16 - 23©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Constant Gross-MarginPercentage NRV Method

This method entails three steps:Step 1:

Compute the overall gross-margin percentage.Step 2:

Use the overall gross-margin percentageand deduct the gross margin from thefinal sales values to obtain the totalcosts that each product should bear.

16 - 24©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Constant Gross-MarginPercentage NRV Method

Step 3:Deduct the expected separable costs from thetotal costs to obtain the joint-cost allocation.

16 - 25©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Constant Gross-MarginPercentage NRV Method

What is the expected final sales value of totalproduction during the accounting period?

Product A1: $120,000Product B1: 346,500Product C1: 241,500Total $708,000

16 - 26©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Constant Gross-MarginPercentage NRV Method

Step 1:Compute the overall gross-margin percentage.Expected final sales value $708,000Deduct joint and separable costs 333,000Gross margin $375,000

Gross margin percentage:$375,000 ÷ $708,000 = 52.966%

16 - 27©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Constant Gross-MarginPercentage NRV Method

Step 2:Deduct the gross margin. Sales Gross Cost of

Value Margin Goods soldProduct A1: $120,000 $ 63,559 $ 56,441Product B1: 346,500 183,527 162,973Product C1: 241,500 127,913 113,587Total $708,000 $375,000 $333,000($1 rounding)

16 - 28©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Constant Gross-MarginPercentage NRV Method

Step 3:Deduct separable costs.

Cost of Separable Joint costs goods sold costs allocated

Product A1: $ 56,441 $ 35,000 $ 21,441Product B1: 162,973 46,500 116,473Product C1: 113,587 51,500 62,087Total $333,000 $133,000 $200,000

16 - 29©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Approach 2: PhysicalMeasure Method Example

$200,000 joint cost

20,000pounds A

48,000pounds B

12,000pounds C

Product A$50,000

Product B$120,000

Product C$30,000

16 - 30©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 5

Explain why the sales value atsplitoff method is preferredwhen allocating joint costs.

16 - 31©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Choosing a Method

Why is the sales value at splitoff method widely used?

It measures the valueof the joint product

immediately.

It does not anticipatesubsequent management

decisions.

It uses ameaningful basis. It is simple.

16 - 32©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Choosing a Method

The purpose of the joint-cost allocation isimportant in choosing the allocation method.

The physical-measure method is a moreappropriate method to use in rate regulation.

16 - 33©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Avoiding Joint Cost Allocation

Some companies refrain from allocating jointcosts and instead carry their inventories

at estimated net realizable value.

16 - 34©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 6

Explain why joint costsare irrelevant in a

sell-or-process-further decision.

16 - 35©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Irrelevance of Joint Costsfor Decision Making

Assume that products A, B, and C can be soldat the splitoff point or processed further

into A1, B1, and C1.Selling Selling Additional

Units price price costs10,000 A: $10 A1: $12 $35,00010,500 B: $30 B1: $33 $46,50011,500 C: $20 C1: $21 $51,500

16 - 36©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Irrelevance of Joint Costsfor Decision Making

Should A, B, or C be sold at the splitoffpoint or processed further?

Product A: Incremental revenue $20,000– Incremental cost $35,000 = ($15,000)

Product B: Incremental revenue $31,500– Incremental cost $46,500 = ($15,000)

Product C: Incremental revenue $11,500– Incremental cost $51,500 = ($40,000)

16 - 37©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Learning Objective 7

Account for byproductsusing two different methods.

16 - 38©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Accounting for Byproducts

Method A:The production method recognizes byproducts

at the time their production is completed.Method B:

The sale method delays recognition ofbyproducts until the time of their sale.

16 - 39©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Accounting for ByproductsExample

Main Products Byproducts (Yards) (Yards)

Production 1,000 400Sales 800 300Ending inventory 200 100Sales price $13/yard $1.00/yardNo beginning finished goods inventory

16 - 40©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Accounting for ByproductsExample

Joint production costs for joint(main) products and byproducts:

Material $2,000Manufacturing labor 3,000Manufacturing overhead 4,000Total production cost $9,000

16 - 41©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Accounting for ByproductsMethod A

Method A: The production methodWhat is the value of ending inventory

of joint (main) products?$9,000 total production cost

– $400 net realizable value of the byproduct= $8,600 net production cost for the joint products

16 - 42©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Accounting for ByproductsMethod A

200 ÷ 1,000 × $8,600 = $1,720 is the valueassigned to the 200 yards in ending inventory.

What is the cost of goods sold?Joint production costs $9,000Less byproduct revenue 400Less main product inventory 1,720Cost of goods sold $6,880

16 - 43©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Accounting for ByproductsMethod A

Income Statement (Method A)Revenues: (800 yards × $13) $10,400Cost of goods sold 6,880Gross margin $ 3,520What is the gross margin percentage?

$3,520 ÷ $10,400 = 33.85%

16 - 44©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Accounting for ByproductsMethod A

What are the inventoriable costs?Main product: 200 ÷ 1,000 × $8,600 = $1,720

Byproduct: 100 × $1.00 = $100

16 - 45©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Journal Entries Method A

Work in Process 2,000Accounts Payable 2,000

To record direct materials purchased and usedin productionWork in Process 7,000

Various Accounts 7,000To record conversion costs in the joint process

16 - 46©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Journal Entries Method A

Byproduct Inventory 400Finished Goods 8,600

Work in Process 9,000To record cost of goods completedCost of Goods Sold 6,880

Finished Goods 6,880To record the cost of the main product sold

16 - 47©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Journal Entries Method A

Cash or Accounts Receivable 10,400Revenues 10,400

To record the sale of the main product

16 - 48©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Accounting for ByproductsMethod B

Method B: The sale method What is the value of ending inventory of

joint (main) products?200 ÷ 1,000 × $9,000 = $1,800

No value is assigned to the 400 yards ofbyproducts at the time of production.The $300 resulting from the sale ofbyproducts is reported as revenues.

16 - 49©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Accounting for ByproductsMethod B

Income Statement (Method B)Revenues: Main product (800 × $13) $10,400Byproducts sold 300Total revenues $10,700Cost of goods sold:

Joint production costs 9,000Less main product inventory 1,800 $ 7,200

Gross margin $ 3,200

16 - 50©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Accounting for ByproductsMethod B

What is the gross margin percentage?$3,200 ÷ $10,700 = 29.91%

What are the inventoriable costs? Main product: 200 ÷ 1,000 × $9,000 = $1,800

By-product: -0-

16 - 51©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Journal Entries Method B

Work in Process 2,000Accounts Payable 2,000

To record direct materials purchased and usedin productionWork in Process 7,000

Various Accounts 7,000To record conversion costs in the joint process

16 - 52©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Journal Entries Method B

Finished Goods 9,000Work in Process 9,000

To record cost of goods completedCost of Goods Sold 7,200

Finished Goods 7,200To record the cost of the main product sold

16 - 53©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

Journal Entries Method B

Cash or Accounts Receivable 10,400Revenues 10,400

To record the sale of the main productCash or Accounts Receivable 300

Revenues 300To record the sale of the byproduct

16 - 54©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster

End of Chapter 16