COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS ... · fleet increased with a series of...
Transcript of COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS ... · fleet increased with a series of...
COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION
o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate ifchanges were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way thatsuggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute yourcontributions under the same license as the original.
How to cite this thesis
Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Index?site_name=Research%20Output (Accessed: Date).
Application of integrated logistics support: A South African railway
case study
A Minor Dissertation Submitted In Partial Fulfilment of the Degree
of
MAGISTER PHILOSOPHIAE
In
ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
at the
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
of the
UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG
by
A. Makhuvele (200729269)
2016
Supervisor: Dr A. Telukdarie
ii
DECLARATION
I, Ahmed Makhuvele, hereby declare that this dissertation under the topic ‘Application of Integrated
Logistics Support: A South African Railway Case Study’, is a presentation of my own work. I have
composed it at my own capacity with assistance from my supervisor, Dr. Arnesh Telukdarie.
Furthermore, I vow that this paper has not been submitted to any high educational institution in an
application of any professional qualification. However, information sources that aided with the
literature have been acknowledged through referencing.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my whole-hearted appreciation to my supervisor, Dr. Arnesh Telukdarie for
his unwavering support throughout the process of developing this research. I appreciate his
guidance, coaching, and teaching he has offered me during the research. I would also wish to
appreciate my wife, Mrs. N Makhuvele, for the support and encouragement she offered me to
complete this research. Lastly, I would like to thank the Mighty God for providing strength, healthy
life, and wisdom to complete this research.
iv
ABSTRACT
Blanchard (1998) considers Integrated Logistic Support (ILS) as a management tool providing
controls ensuring that the product or the system meets its anticipated performance requirements and
receive adequate technical and operational support throughout its life cycle. Organisations globally
conduct gigantic projects in various sectors such as manufacturing, services and merchandising. An
increase in project size, project cost, project complexity, advanced technology and strategic
importance, enforces organisations to apply ILS practice (Jones, 2006). The practice of ILS ensures
that the benefits realised from the system and the system’s life-cycle support is adequately and cost-
effectively managed (Jones, 2006). Transnet conducts a programme of acquiring 1 064 locomotives
to improve operational efficiencies and to attract new business.
The purpose of this research is to assess the effectiveness of ILS elements in Transnet, supporting
the locomotive life-cycle. The research comprises a problem statement, literature review, research
methodology, data analysis, and a conclusion. The literature is developed and tested at Transnet
through survey techniques. Questionnaires are sent to 110 potential respondents and 95 participants
responded. The data is analysed using weighted average per question whereby the targeted average
score per question is ≥80%. Responses from respondents indicate that most ILS elements are
effective though certain elements still need improvements. Elements that are ineffective are
manpower adequacy level and inventory management systems. Chapter 5 presents a conclusion
and recommendations to close gaps on elements that did not meet the targeted score.
v
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
5S Sort, Set in order, Shine, Standardise, Sustain
°- C Degrees Celsius
AHP Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP)
CBM Condition Based Maintenance
CIA Central Intelligence Agency
CM Corrective Maintenance
D Diesel
DOD Department of Defence
E Electrical
EOQ Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)
GFB General Freight Business
HSE Health and safety executives
ILS Integrated Logistics Support
Km Kilometres
MDBF Mean Distance between Failures
MDS Market Demand Strategy
MTBF Mean Time between Failures
MTPA Million tons per annum
MTSF Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTSF)
NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer
OHS Occupational Health and Safety
PDM Predictive Maintenance
PM Preventive Maintenance
PRASA Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa
R Rand
RBD Reliability Block Diagram
RIC Russian, Indian, and China sector
RSR Railway Safety Regulator
SADC South American and Southern African Development Community
SoE School of Engineering
TCP Transnet Capital Project
TE Transnet Engineering
TNPA Transnet National Port Authority
TPT Transnet Port Terminal
vi
TFR Transnet Freight Rail
TTC Time to Completion
TFR Transnet Freight Rail
TPL Transnet Pipeline
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12
1.1 Background -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12
1.2 Statement of the problem -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12
1.3 Introduction to railway ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13
1.4 Motivation and importance of the study --------------------------------------------------------------- 13
1.5 Research questions --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14
1.6 Report configuration --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 15
2.1 The international railway sector------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15
2.2 South African Railway System -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15
2.3 Transnet corporate ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15
2.4 Transnet Freight Rail -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16
2.5 Introduction to ILS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17
2.6 Evolution of logistics --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17
2.7 Definitions of integrated logistics support ------------------------------------------------------------ 18
2.8 Integrated logistics support elements (disciplines) ------------------------------------------------- 20
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY --------------------------------------------------------- 32
3.1 Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32
3.2 Data collection methodologies -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32
3.3 Application of questionnaires methodology ---------------------------------------------------------- 32
3.4 Research methodology ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 33
3.5 Developing questionnaires and scaling techniques ------------------------------------------------ 33
3.6 Research process ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 34
3.7 Sample size and data saturation ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 35
3.8 Data analysis approach ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 36
viii
3.9 Comparisons of questionnaires structure and literature review --------------------------------- 37
3.10 Reliability and validity ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 38
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA ANALYSIS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 40
4.1 Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 40
4.2 Question 1: What is your working experience? ----------------------------------------------------- 40
4.3 Question 2: What is your age? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 41
4.4 Question 3: What is your designation? --------------------------------------------------------------- 41
4.5 Question 4: Are the locomotives maintenance processes and procedures clear and
understood by the maintenance team? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 42
4.6 Question 5: Does Transnet have effective locomotive maintenance plans that outline the
nature of maintenance to be conducted? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 43
4.7 Question 6: Is there an effective inventory management system that advises when to
order and how much to order? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 44
4.8 Question 7: Is there effective quality evaluation procedure applied ensuring that the
delivered material is of acceptable quality standard and specification? ------------------------------- 46
4.9 Question 8: Are the Locomotives reliability factors known and monitored? ------------------ 46
4.10 Question 9: Is there an effective system/technology used to conduct condition based
maintenance to uplift the reliability level of locomotives --------------------------------------------------- 47
4.11 Question 10: Is the training offered to maintainers and operators effective? ---------------- 48
4.12 Question 11: Is adequate training equipment in place to conduct the required practical
training? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 49
4.13 Question 12: Is there enough personnel required, fully trained and certified to conduct
locomotives maintenance and operations at any time? ---------------------------------------------------- 50
4.14 Question 13: Is there an effective forecasting model in place, used to determine the future
required personnel capacity, supporting future maintenance and operations? ---------------------- 52
4.15 Question 14: Is the maintenance plant floor visibly demarcated with labelled of tools and
material? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 52
4.16 Question 15: Is the lighting and temperature in the workshop favourable? ------------------ 54
ix
4.17 ILS cross-referencing ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 54
4.18 Management versus workers observations ---------------------------------------------------------- 56
4.19 Satisfactory and unsatisfactory elements analysis ------------------------------------------------- 57
CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ------------------------------------------ 59
5.1 Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 59
5.2 Conclusion and discussion ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 59
5.3 Recommendations ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 62
APPENDIX A: TABULAR DATA ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------------ 75
APPENDIX B: EXPERIENCE ANALYSIS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 78
APPENDIX C: QUESTIONNAIRE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 82
x
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Evolution of logistics support (Lambert, 2008) ................................................................................. 17
Figure 2: Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Elements (Blanchard, 1998) (Bouachera, 2012) ....................... 20
Figure 3: Maintenance types (Murthy, et al., 2002) (Lambert, 2008) (Blanchard, 1998) ................................ 22
Figure 4: Bathtub curve (Garg & Deshmukh, 2006) ........................................................................................ 31
Figure 5: Research process [103] ................................................................................................................... 35
Figure 6: Question 1 responses ...................................................................................................................... 40
Figure 7: Question 2 responses ...................................................................................................................... 41
Figure 8: Question 3 responses ...................................................................................................................... 42
Figure 9: Question 4 responses ...................................................................................................................... 43
Figure 10: Question 5 responses .................................................................................................................... 44
Figure 11: Question 6 responses .................................................................................................................... 45
Figure 12: Question 7 responses .................................................................................................................... 46
Figure 13: Question 8 Responses ................................................................................................................... 47
Figure 14: Question 9 responses .................................................................................................................... 48
Figure 15: Question 10 responses .................................................................................................................. 49
Figure 16: Question 11 responses .................................................................................................................. 50
Figure 17: Question 12 responses .................................................................................................................. 51
Figure 18: Question 13 responses .................................................................................................................. 52
Figure 19: Question 14 responses .................................................................................................................. 53
Figure 20: Question 15 responses .................................................................................................................. 54
Figure 21: ILS elements cross-referencing ...................................................................................................... 55
Figure 22: Employees versus management perceptions ................................................................................ 56
xi
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Likert 5-point scale............................................................................................................................. 34
Table 2: Likert scale description ...................................................................................................................... 34
Table 3: Questionnaire versus literature .......................................................................................................... 37
Table 4: Average score target versus actual average score ........................................................................... 57
Table 5: Question 4 Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 75
Table 6: Question 5 Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 75
Table 7: Question 6 Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 75
Table 8: Question 7 Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 75
Table 9: Question 8 Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 75
Table 10: Question 9 Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 76
Table 11: Question 10 Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 76
Table 12: Question 11 Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 76
Table 13: Question 12 Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 76
Table 14: Question 13 Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 76
Table 15: Question 14 Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 77
Table 16: Question 15 Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 77
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
An increase in project size; project cost; project complexity; advanced technology and strategic
importance, encourages organisations to apply ILS (Jones, 2006). An ILS application assists an
organisation to improve system life-cycle and reliability cost-effectively (Jones, 2006). Blanchard
(1998) defines ILS as a management tool providing controls ensuring the product or the system
meets its anticipated performance requirements and receive adequate technical and operational
support throughout its life cycle. Blanchard (1998) and Hutchinson (2000) suggest that ILS features
in the structured planning, design and operation requirements to support the asset.
1.2 Statement of the problem
According to the study by Marten Jr (2010), an increase in quantity of locomotives in the railway
industry, escalates the level of workload on maintenance and inspections, sustaining a reliability
level of locomotives. Transnet Freight Rail (TFR) fluctuates from a strategy of “responding to
confirmed demand” to “creating capacity to unlock demand”. As part of Transnet’s Market Demand
Strategy (MDS), TFR committed to growing volumes by 142 million tonnes, from 208 million tonnes
to 350 million tonnes; over 60% of this growth is expected to be delivered by the General Freight
Business (GFB), which will grow from 82.6 million tonnes to 170 million tonnes by 2019 (Transnet,
2013). The average age of the locomotives at Transnet is 32 years. Major procurements occurred of
over 1000 locally manufactured electric locomotives in 1970 and 1980, becoming the workhorses of
the current fleet. No new locomotives were purchased for GFB from 1992 through to 2008. The GFB
fleet increased with a series of purchases including 50 “like new” diesel, 100 diesel, and 43 diesel
locomotives; recently, 95 x Class20E locomotives were procured. The economically designed
lifespan of a locomotive is 30 years. In the absence of new locomotives, the workhorse fleet was
provided life-extending upgrades to the lifespan of 45 years. These upgrades resulted in increased
maintenance costs and difficulty in obtaining spares. As the most cost-effective and technological
options for extending the life of a locomotive are exhausted, further extensions are no longer
economically cost-effective or technologically practical (Transnet, 2013).
13
Transnet invested in the procurement of new locomotives, supporting its planned volume ramp-up
attracting emerging businesses. The quantity of 1 064 locomotives (465 diesel and 599 electric) is
planned to run for seven years. The procurement of 1 064 new locomotives is planned to commence
in the financial year 2012, terminating in 2018 to 2019 (Transnet, 2013). Transnet’s purchase of 1
064 locomotives is a critical procurement event facilitating Transnet’s delivery against its MDS
targets, transforming the business, increasing operational efficiencies, supporting local supplier
development. Transnet’s procurement strategy will be adequately flexible to adapt to actual
locomotives demand, realised over time (Transnet, 2013). Transnet Engineering (TE) will be
significantly impacted concerning maintenance practices and consolidating maintenance depots.
The purpose of this research is to assess the effectiveness of Integrated Logistics Support
elements in Transnet to sustain locomotives’ life-cycle and reliabilities.
1.3 Introduction to railway
Transportation is an enormous practice and a significant part of the economy. The need for
transportation has increased significantly (Lindfeldt, 2010). Railway operation is one of transportation
model available in the transportation sector. In the freight business, railways transport a considerable
volume of commodities (OECD, 2013). Since 2001, the railway volume indicated a significant growth
on the global scale. In 2010, the railway system transported commodities of approximately 9.5 trillion
ton per kilometre (Olievschi, 2013). Africa railway operations achieved a 7% growth in freight
transportation and a slight decline in passenger transportation (Olievschi, 2013).
1.4 Motivation and importance of the study
Locomotives life-cycle management and support are parts of the complex processes as it involves
numerous factors (Ahuja, et al., 2002). If the life-cycle management is not well structured, the
organisation may experience a rise in maintenance cost and the life-cycle of an asset can be
14
significantly reduced (Szkoda, 2014) (Thorlacius, 2015). Each Locomotive cost significant amount
of capital (Transnet, 2013), requiring comprehensive life-cycle support and management.
1.5 Research questions
This study aims to answer following questions:
How effective are ILS elements (training, maintenance plan, facilities, inventory management
system, reliability management, and manpower capacity) to support the locomotives life-cycle in
Transnet?
How do railway employees perceive ILS elements based on their various superiority levels?
How do railway employees perceive ILS elements, based on their various seniority levels?
1.6 Report configuration
This report comprises five chapters. Chapter 1 discusses the introduction, problem statement,
objective of the study and research questions. Chapter 2 outlines the literature in ILS and how it is
applied in the international arena. Chapter 3 presents the research design and the methodology
followed to acquire data. Chapter 4 focuses on data interpretation and analysis. Chapter 5
concentrates on conclusion and recommendations, based on findings against the international best
practice.
15
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter discusses the review of literature on ILS in the international platforms. The literature is
extracted from journal articles, railway reports, books and conference reports.
2.1 The international railway sector
According to (TheWorldBank, 2011), railway operations is the most cost-effective and efficient mode
of transportation focussing on people and goods transportation on a fixed route, using locomotives,
coaches, and wagons. On the global sphere, railway can be categorised into five key sectors. The
American sector is the biggest rail industry with a total rail of 337 791 km. The Russian, India, and
China sector (RIC) has a total rail route of 268 652 km (Ditsele, 2015). The South American and
Southern African Development Community (SADC) is the railway zone with the smallest rail route
length. The SADC rail sector has the collective route of approximately 57 869 km, in which South
African Railways contribute 59% of the length equating to 34 142 km (Transnet, 2015).
2.2 South African Railway System
The main two railway operators in South Africa are TFR and Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa
(PRASA) (RSR, 2014). Gautrain joined these main two rail operators, as the passenger’s transport
service provider, introduced in 2010. TFR owns and maintains approximately 22 000 km rail routes
nationally. This includes the main two export routes, coal and iron ore lines and the general freight
lines on the remainder of the rail network. PRASA owns and maintains 2 228 km of the rail network.
Gautrain comprises a total route of 80 km, linking Johannesburg Park Station, OR Tambo
International Airport and Pretoria Station (RSR, 2014). According to the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA) World Fact Book, the South African rail network ranks number 14 on the world rail network
capacity (RSR, 2014).
2.3 Transnet corporate
Transnet is the largest and vital logistics solution delivering freight across South Africa. It is a state-
owned company, structured to deliver freight through its divisions, namely, Transnet Freight Rail
16
(TFR), Transnet Engineering (TE), Transnet Capital Projects (TCP), Transnet Pipelines (TPL),
Transnet Port Terminal (TPT) and Transnet National Port Authority (TNPA) (Transnet, 2015).
Transnet is the custodian of South African ports, rail, and pipelines. Transnet is expected to align
with Government’s national development plans in developing the Government’s Medium Term
Strategic Framework (MTSF) outcome. The MTSF is balanced with structured commercial viability
analysis, whereby Transnet aims to improve operations efficiencies and market competitiveness
(Transnet, 2015). Each Transnet operating division perform a different and crucial function, ensuring
that Transnet achieves the set objectives and targets (Transnet, 2015). Various functions of Transnet
operating divisions are (Transnet, 2015):
Transnet Freight Rail – TFR is the largest Transnet operating division transporting the bulk
freight by rail between mines, production hubs, distributions centres, cross-border operations
and ports.
Transnet Engineering – TE is responsible for rolling stock maintenance, refurbishment and
rolling stock manufacturing.
Transnet National Port Authority – TNPA provides marine service, port maintenance and
improvement of port infrastructure.
Transnet Port Terminals – TPT’s main function is to operate the ports and automotive terminals.
Transnet Pipeline – TPL’s function is to transport fuel from Secunda to Durban and Richards
Bay through pipeline.
Transnet Capital Projects – TCP executes the capital programmes, such as infrastructure
upgrade and expansions.
2.4 Transnet Freight Rail
TFR is one of the largest railway organisations in Africa. This organisation positions its business
strategy to be amongst the top five global railway operators (Transnet, 2013). TFR’s core business
is to transport bulk and containerised freight (Transnet, 2013). TFR invests in procuring new
additional locomotives to support its planned volume ramp-up and to attract emerging business
(Transnet, 2010). The quantity of 1 064 locomotives (465 diesel engines and 599 electric engines)
is planned to run for seven years (Transnet, 2013). TFR comprises 2 438 locomotives of which 1
17
478 are electric and 960 are diesel. The addition of 1 064 locomotives will escalate the total quantity
to 3 494 locomotives in the TFR system.
2.5 Introduction to ILS
According to Jones (2006), Blanchard (1998) and Hutchinson (2000), an organisation benefits from
the system if an overall understanding of the system operations and maintenance is present. Prior
to system operations, there should be a comprehensive maintenance setup and support, keeping
the system reliable and operable consistently (Blanchard, 1998). Applying ILS assists in achieving
an organisational readiness to accept the system. Blanchard (1998) defines ILS as the basic
management functions for initial planning, funding, and controls ensuring users receive the system
that will not only meet its performance requirements, but the system that can be expeditiously and
economically supported through its anticipated life-cycle. ILS comprises various elements. For this
research, the following elements will be considered: maintenance plan; inventory management;
facilities requirements, manpower capacity adequacy, training standard; training devices or
equipment, and reliability management.
2.6 Evolution of logistics
ILS advanced intensely and was adopted by several business institutions. According to (Robeson,
et al., 2001), Integrated Logistics Management comprises three stages as indicated in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Evolution of logistics support (Lambert, 2008)
18
Stage 1 – Physical distribution of goods. The distribution of goods should be managed in a manner
to satisfy the customer’s needs and expectations.
Stage 2 – Internal linkages. The logistics cater for the material flow within the internal organisational
value linkage across the three internal material flow channels.
Stage 3 – External linkages. At this stage, the logistics approach includes externally focused change.
Organisations commenced strategizing to strengthen the relationship with their vendors, customers
and third parties (Robeson, et al., 2001).
Lambert (2008) suggests that the development of ILS includes scientific management, customer
focus, data processing technology, and profit influences. According to the United States DoD, ILS
was introduced in 1964 and was initially discovered by the military institution. Numerous researchers
worked tirelessly to redefine, modify and simplify ILS with greater success (Babbitt, 2000). It was
expanded with considerable attention from various business sectors. The ILS concept was also
implemented by NATO to achieve seamless transportation of personnel, facility constructions,
medical services, material handling and distribution and service acquisitions (Babbitt, 2000).
2.7 Definitions of integrated logistics support
Various definitions present the ILS, based on the nature of the environment and the field where it is
applied.
2.7.1 ILS definition by the military
The DoD Directive 5 000.39 define ILS as the management tool used to support the system design,
sustaining the system throughout its life-cycle at the considerable minimal cost (DoD, 2007). The
U.S. Army Regulations 700-127 define ILS as the management tool that can be used to influence
the operational requirements and the system specifications to continuously improve the system life-
cycle cost (DA, 2008).
19
2.7.2 ILS definition by the engineering field
Blanchard (1998) defines ILS as the basic management function for initial planning, funding, and
control, ensuring that end-users receive the system not only meeting the performance requirements
but the system that can be expeditiously and economically supported through its anticipated life-
cycle. Polad & Meher-Homji (2003) complements (Blanchard, 1998), by suggesting that ILS is the
combination of all the necessary requirements, effectively ensuring that the system is economically
and operationally supported throughout its anticipated life-cycle.
2.7.3 ILS definition by the industries
Hutchinson (2000) defines ILS as the identification of logistics risks and the mitigation actions that
prevent risks from materialising. Quayle (2000) defines ILS as a provision of the system technical
support at a lower cost. Jones (2006) defines ILS as the technical element of the military forces that
can also support an operations of the railway, shipping and petroleum industries. Jones (2006)
suggests that ILS can also be classified as the component of customer services and product support.
The study by (Adler, 2002) presents ILS as the practice to analyse the total cost of the system. It
can also be applied by management to reduce business uncertainties (Adler, 2002). Taylor (2015)
suggests that the influence of the ILS on the deployed system is measured by the operability
availability, maintainability and the testability of the system. The ILS measuring process includes the
system sustaining cost, engineering processes contributing to the system reliability and
modularisation (2015).
2.7.4 Shared view on definitions
Based on ILS definitions from various fields, the shared view is that the system should be ready to
be deployed and the business environment should be ready to accept the system, achieving its
optimal utilisation through proper management and support.
20
2.8 Integrated logistics support elements (disciplines)
ILS Elements are discussed in detail in this chapter. Elements presented in this chapter are
maintenance planning, inventory management, maintenance facilities requirements, manpower
capacity, training standards, training devices or equipment and reliability management. Figure 2
depicts the elements of ILS and how they complement each other to meet the shared objective.
Figure 2: Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Elements (Blanchard, 1998) (Bouachera, 2012)
2.8.1 Maintenance planning
Maintenance management is a vital aspect contributing to business survival and should be
approached strategically (Antony, 2014). Lyson & Laggan (2011) define maintenance management
as the practice of providing the policy guidance for maintenance activities. It performs a vital part in
managing and monitoring the entire maintenance programmes. There should be a comprehensive
synchronisation between the maintenance process and the operations process ensuring the system
is maintained seamlessly (Krivtsov, et al., 1999) (Murthy, et al., 2002).
21
As maintenance activities increases, it is important to review and build up the comprehensive
maintenance management structure that can handle the required maintenance (O'Connor & Kleyner,
2012). Locomotives’ lifespan can be reduced significantly if maintenance practice is compromised.
Locomotives are the most maintenance demanding resources in the railway system (Budin, 2003).
If the locomotives are improperly maintained, the entire railway system will be vulnerable (Connor,
2012).
Murray (2001) advocates that maintenance is a costly exercise, becoming more expensive if parts
are replaced too early or too late due to inadequate maintenance plans. The study by (Grimes &
Barkan, 2006) (Tu, et al., 2001) indicates that the comprehensive maintenance plan should be
developed at the earliest stage prior to the system operations to sustain system reliability and
availability throughout its operational phase. The report by (Army, 2004) suggests that it is crucial
that the entire maintenance team understand the interpretation of the maintenance processes and
procedures in order to conduct the system maintenance effectively and safely.
Locomotives maintenance can be planned in one of the three techniques: mileage based; time-
based and condition based (Connor, 2012). Times-based maintenance is conducted on the safety
components such as brake systems and wheels (Yao, et al., 2013). Mileage based maintenance is
conducted based on the mileage that the locomotive covered. Some researchers believe that some
of the locomotive components can also deteriorate quickly if the locomotive idled for longer period
(Connor, 2012).
Maintenance planning is a management practice leading to developing the maintenance plan and
schedule for the system (Amtrak, 2011). According to (Babel & Szkoda, 2016), the maintenance plan
should include all maintenance intervals; set of tasks; maintenance activities, procedures and
resources required.
A maintenance schedule is developed to articulate tasks that need to be executed with level and
types of maintenance to be implemented (Garg & Deshmukh, 2006). A maintenance schedule also
22
defines resources required ensuring that the maintenance activities are seamlessly implemented
(Al-Shayea, 2012). Scheduled maintenance is developed to ensure maintenance is prioritised based
on the system component failure rate and to improve resources utilisation efficiencies (Gandhare, et
al., 2014) (Duffuaa, et al., 2009) (Lee, et al., 2008).
The study by (Predikto, 2012) reports that railway sectors spend a significant amount of
approximately average of R2.2 million on each locomotive per year on maintenance. Amtrak
(Amtrak, 2011) believes that the locomotive maintenance philosophy should be designed to
maximise the reliability and to minimise the maintenance cost. Approximately 45% of the
maintenance activities are unplanned and cost three to nine times more than the planned
maintenance activities (Predikto, 2012). The annual locomotive downtime (due to maintenance
activities) reduces the availability of the locomotives by 11%, which is a significant loss of revenue
to the business. The study suggests that significant costs can be saved if 10% of unplanned
maintenance should transfer to scheduled maintenance, implicating failure should be predictable
(Predikto, 2012). Figure 3 depicts types of system maintenance.
Figure 3: Maintenance types (Murthy, et al., 2002) (Lambert, 2008) (Blanchard, 1998)
Preventative Maintenance (PM), as suggested by (Duffuaa, et al., 2009) (Yao, et al., 2004), is
conducted ensuring that the system remains in the acceptable operational condition, by running
inspection and amending possible failures before they occur. The primary goal of preventive
Maintenance
Unplanned Maintenance
Predictive Maintenance
Preventive Maintenance
Corrective Maintenance Breakdown Emergency
CBMDeferred, Remedial, Shutdown,
Window, Running, Routine
Planned Maintenance
23
maintenance is to preserve and enhance the system reliability. Preventive maintenance includes oil
changes; greasing; changing filters and general visual inspection (Cheng, et al., 2012) (Palo, 2014).
The primary benefit of preventive maintenance is to sustain the programmed life-cycle of the system,
reduce failure rates and breakdowns, reduce unnecessary downtime costs and minimise the
repairing cost (Szwedo, 2012) (Dhillon, 2002) (Krivtsov, et al., 1999). Dhillon (2002) suggests that
the PM can be implemented effectively with adequate facilities, well-trained personnel, management
support, proper maintenance schedule and comprehensive plans.
The study by (Baek, et al., 2007) concludes that locomotive accumulative fatigues, deterioration and
the wear-out occur as the locomotive running times accumulate. The cost of wear and fatigue are
three times more expensive than the manufacturing cost (Palo, 2014). Baek, et al (2007) emphasise
that it is crucial to initiate the preventive maintenance to reduce the maintenance costs.
Corrective Maintenance (CM) is the maintenance practice conducted after the failure occurred,
aimed at eliminating the source of failure and minimising the frequency of failure occurrences
(Zhang, et al., 2012) (Marten Jr, 2010).Dhillon (2002) complements the study by (Zhang, et al., 2012)
(Marten Jr, 2010) by defining corrective maintenance as unscheduled maintenance, comprising
unpredictable maintenance requirements that cannot be planned or programmed to occur at the
particular time. According to the (Instanbul, 2016), corrective maintenance activities involve repair
and correction activities after the unpredicted failure occurred. Corrective maintenance is conducted
to return the system to its normal operating condition. For the corrective maintenance to be
conducted successfully, the original OEM parts should be used. Installation should meet the
manufacturer’s specifications, and shortcuts should be avoided (Dhillon, 2002) (Szwedo, 2012). An
assessment of spares availability and adequacy should be considered as a prerequisite factor for
the corrective maintenance of the locomotives to be conducted seamlessly (Thorlacius, 2015)
(Teshome, 2012).
Predictive maintenance (PDM) is the maintenance practise whereby the condition and operating
efficiency of the system are frequently monitored, generating the data to strategize the maintenance
24
philosophy (Bérengu, et al., 2002) (Al-Shayea, 2012). The study by (Mobley, 2002) (Bérengu, et al.,
2002) suggests that PDM lowers the cost of unscheduled maintenance due to system failure and
maximises the intervals between repairs. Locomotives conditions monitoring activities are normally
conducted with thermal, acoustic and light sensors, capturing fleet information on bearings, brakes,
wheels, undercarriage and body (Phelan, et al., 2014). The wayside condition monitoring systems
focussed on bearing temperature and dragging equipment and are used to activate the alarm
preventing derailment due to component failures (Phelan, et al., 2014) (Yao, et al., 2004).
The information generated from the sensors assist in channelling maintenance efforts on
components of highest priority, but it does not necessarily change the maintenance strategy (Phelan,
et al., 2014) (Yao, et al., 2004). Predictive maintenance analyses system condition data to influence
the preventive maintenance (Edirisinghe & Faiz , 2009) (Antony, 2014). A study by (Szwedo, 2012)
emphasises that when predictive maintenance is properly conducted, an organisation reduces
maintenance cost by over 25%; eliminate more than 70% of breakdown; reduce the down time by
45% and increase production by 25%. Locomotive predictive maintenance can be conducted based
on the mileage or operating time ensuring that the reliability level is sustained and improved (Weiss,
2013).
Condition-based Maintenance (CBM) is the maintenance practice conducted to monitor the actual
condition of the system to provide guidance on the type of maintenance needed to be conducted on
the system. CBM has also been introduced into the locomotive maintenance regime (Connor, 2012).
Some researchers suggest that the condition monitoring should be conducted by assessing the
operating behaviour of the components. The components should be replaced if it depicts the sign of
wear out or failure beyond the acceptable limits (Teshome, 2012). The condition based maintenance
practice reduces the level of uncertainty of the maintenance activity to be conducted. Condition
monitoring processes should be automated to provide accurate data enabling proper planning of the
preventive maintenance, to sustain the system condition and prevent potential failures (Nappi, 2014)
(Walker, et al., 2014).
25
2.8.2 Inventory management
Inventory management is a vital element in the supply chain management (Lar, et al., 2006) (Xiaobin,
et al., 2007). Chukwuemeka & Onwusoronye (2013) suggest that challenges of determining the time
of order, order quantity and how much to stock, balancing the ordering cost and holding cost with
less interruption to the maintenance process and activities, was asserted. The inventory level should
always be monitored and sustained ensuring that the maintenance and operations activities run
seamlessly, benefitting of the organisation (Xiaobin, et al., 2007). Inadequate control of the inventory
results in understocking or overstocking of material (Telsang, 2001).
Eagles Height Industries Limited, in Nigeria, was challenged with overstocking and understocking of
material due to improper inventory management. This improper inventory management led Eagles
Height to excessive costs due to overstocking. They subsequently closed down some of the
production sections when they were short of the material due to understocking and started to
experience customer dissatisfaction (Chukwuemeka & Onwusoronye, 2013). To avoid overstocking
and understocking, the inventory manager should develop a proper approach, outlining and
specifying orders, when to order and establish the quantity to order, minimising the storage cost and
possibility of stock overrun or stock overflow (Grondys, 2010) (Chukwuemeka & Onwusoronye,
2013) (Telsang, 2001).
2.8.2.1 Inventory priorities
Items to be procured should be categorised according to importance concerning the cost of the item,
potential profit and the usage frequency (Chukwuemeka & Onwusoronye, 2013) (Teunter &
Syntetos, 2009). According to (Pycraft, et al., 2007), managers must classify levels of control that
they apply to the various stock items. Classification of items is accomplished through multiple criteria
in the ABC classification model (Teunter & Syntetos, 2009). Application of the ABC model is based
on the Pareto principle (80/20 rule) (Ng, 2007). The Pareto analysis assumes that 20% of stock items
contributes 80% of the production or maintenance of the system (Pycraft, et al., 2007) (Kanawaty,
26
2002). Dorai, et al (2013) suggest that applying the multiple criteria ABC classification model, assists
in equipping inventory managers with advanced managerial skills. It allows applying additional
aspects, such as lead time and criticality. The ABC analysis also factors in the Saaty’s Analytic
Hierarchical Process (AHP) assessing spares criticality by weighing each spare part, describing its
importance (Fredendall, et al., 2002). Inventory managers should invest their effort to monitor and
control the significant items as classified (Pycraft, et al., 2007):
Class A Items (high-value items) – 20% stock accounting 80% of the total stock value.
Class B Items (medium-value items) – 30% stock accounting 10% of the total stock value.
Class C Items (low-value items) – 50% stock items accounting 10% of the total stock value.
2.8.2.2 Economic Order Quantity
The general model of deciding on items or stock order quantity is called the Economic Order Quantity
(EOQ) (Xiaobin, et al., 2007). The EOQ model was discovered by Ford Whitman Harris in 1913
(Pettit, et al., 2010) (Pycraft, et al., 2007). This model strives acquiring the balance between the
advantages and disadvantages of the holding stock (Pycraft, et al., 2007). The EOQ model is the
best practice ensuring that the level of the material is kept on the required quantity, based on the
production requirements (Ozdemirb & Eroglua, 2007). To effectively support the system, the required
material should be at the appropriate place at the right time (Pettit, et al., 2010). The material should
be timeously forecasted, addressing the risk of the long lead time that can result in the system not
being maintained timeously (Pettit, et al., 2010). The stock level should be tracked and managed on
the designated inventory management system to eliminate possible human errors (Weiss, 2013).
Appropriate estimation of the EOQ application comprises inputs aspects such as ordering cost,
holding cost and the demand rate (Pycraft, et al., 2007) (Xiaobin, et al., 2007). The primary purpose
of the EOQ is to determine the optimal order quantity at any time, whereby the sum of the holding
and ordering cost is established at the minimal level (Weiss, 2013) (Xiaobin, et al., 2007) (Pycraft,
et al., 2007).
27
2.8.3 Maintenance facilities readiness
Locomotives require exceptional and remarkable maintenance facilities. The locomotive
maintenance facilities should be designed and built to last 100 years or more. Adequate condition
monitoring is required to keep the facility resilient (Connor, 2012) (Ouyang & Xie, 2015).
2.8.3.1 Maintenance and inspection sheds or workshops
The locomotive service facilities necessitate conducting the locomotive inspection and maintenance
activities. The inspection facility should be designed to accommodate the full length of the
locomotive. The floor of locomotive inspection and maintenance workshop should be clearly
demarcated, depicting the safe pathways and hazardous areas to prevent accidents and injuries
(OSHA, 2002).
Workshop Lighting must also be adequate for the employees to notice a hazard that can be swiftly
avoided. Adequate lighting improves employee concentration and prevents eyestrain (HSE, 2010).
According to (Skansi, 2012), poor illumination in the workshop can negatively impact the productivity
and efficiencies of the employees.
HSE suggests the productivity of employees improves when operating in favourable temperature
conditions. Too high or too low temperatures in the workshop can be detrimental to employees. In
referring to workplace occupational health and safety (OHS) Acts, an acceptable temperature is
indicated at, at least 16° C. It is recommended though, that the temperature should be at the
minimum of 13° C in workshops where severe physical effort is applied (HSE, 2010).
2.8.4 Manpower capacity adequacy
A report by (Transport, 2016) indicates that locomotive maintenance sections face challenges
whereby 40% of the personnel is over the age of 50 years and 22% is over 55 years. The railway
recruitment plan should earmark the younger professionals, growing within the organisational
system (Transport, 2016).
28
Blanchard (Blanchard, 1998) defines the labour as the adequate human capacity required to support,
maintain and operate the system throughout its life-cycle. Hikmat (2001) indicate that labour planning
is not a simple exercise since it involves human behaviour that is sometimes not controllable. It
should be approached in a strategic manner. His study indicates that skilled personnel must be
recruited to fulfil the labour requirements, based on the workload plans (Hikmat, 2001). Sustaining
the labour capacity is not only by recruiting but is also influenced by retraining the current workforce.
Insufficient maintenance personnel can pose a risk in achieving the required maintenance objectives.
Management should thus ensure ample capacity to perform the maintenance activities (Duffuaa, et
al., 2009).
Management should develop the labour forecasting model, assisting labour planning and prediction.
Forecasting and planning are important factors in the maintenance environment. It involves
considering a multiple and wide ranges of criteria (WiproLTD, 2014) (Al-Shayea, 2012).
2.8.5 Training and training devices
(Noe, 2010) (Bekkering, 2004) (Blanchard, 1998), define training as a planned effort by an
organisation to facilitate labourers learning on-the-job-related competences. Training is procedures
and processes used to train personnel in specific knowledge areas. The training devices are the
equipment and machinery required to conduct the training (Bekkering, 2004) (Noe, 2010). Noe (Noe,
2010) emphasises that organisations must advance their training programmes to realise quality work
and safe operations. Training should not focus on junior employees only; even the aging employees
must be trained on new technology (Noe, 2010).
Training devices include simulators and audio-visual mock-ups. The certified trainer must conduct
the training, using the appropriate training devices and systems. Noe (2010) believes that on-the-job
training is important for trainees, providing real-world practice. Bekkering (2004) recited the Chines
proverb stating “I hear – I forget; I see – I remember and I do – I understand”. The final assessment
should be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the training programme.
29
2.8.6 Reliability management
Reliability is the probability of the system to operate without any failure with the provided condition
and the anticipated time interval (Milutinović & Lučanin, 2005). Reliability is the most vital aspect of
the railway operations thus, maintenance should be a priority ensuring that the reliability level of the
locomotives is sustained (Lee, et al., 2008). Locomotive reliability level can either be measured by
the Mean Time between Failure (MTBF) or Mean Distance Between Failure (MDBF) (Lee, et al.,
2008) (Connor, 2012). Locomotive breakdowns should be frequently and properly recorded to
assess the locomotive reliability ratios (Budin, 2003). For the system to remain reliable, causes of
failure should be comprehensively understood to be prevented (O'Connor & Kleyner, 2012). The root
causes of locomotive failure should be specified per component ensuring that the failure trend is
properly recorded, for example, diesel, engine failure, pneumatic system failure, electrical rotating
and machine failure. (Budin, 2003).
The locomotives should have the high-reliability level since it is a risky mode of transportation of
freight and people. Unreliable locomotives led to a huge financial loss at the Indian Railways
(Gandhare, et al., 2014). To address the system reliability challenges, the reliability probabilities
should be categorised as discrete functions, continuous functions and point processes (O'Connor &
Kleyner, 2012). The system component is assessed in the discrete functions and declared functional
or non-functional. The continuous functions are governed by continuous variables such as time and
distance. The reliability of the system components will be based on time and the distance travelled.
Whether the system component fails or passes the test, may be due to aging and the reliability
should be treated as the continuous function. The reliability of the system components can also be
treated as the point process if the failure rate is high within the provided period (O'Connor & Kleyner,
2012). The reliability of locomotives is mostly determined by one million kilometres travelled by the
locomotive (Milutinović & Lučanin, 2005).
The Channel Shuttle locomotives cover approximately 5 000 kilometres a week and receive an initial
inspection (Meeker, 2013). The French locomotives are provided with the daily visual inspection of
30
the underframe components and the pantograph. It is the responsibility of the locomotives owners
to sustain locomotive reliability levels by preventing in-service failures and unplanned maintenance
(Meeker, 2013). It is always important to predict the locomotive retirement to avoid operating with
an unreliable locomotive due to age (Meeker, 2013).
Furthermore, Meeker (2013) suggests that the early detection software of the locomotive reliability
issues or challenges should be factored in the locomotive design ensuring the locomotives reliability
challenges are addressed proactively through proper maintenance practice. When locomotives
approach their ageing state, they should be modernised to improve their reliability level (Babel &
Szkoda, 2016). The modernisation should be focussed on the most unreliable units and systems of
the locomotives.
Maintenance teams should also understand the locomotive reliability phases/classes that provide
guidance on when to address the reliability challenges. The reliability concept has three classes of
the system life-cycle, being the infant mortality phase, the normal period and the wear out period.
During infant mortality, the system tolerates a declining failure rate. During the normal operating
period, the system endures the constant failure rate. During the wear-out, the system accumulates
an increasing failure rate (Tarum, 2014). Figure 4 depicts the reliability bathtub curve with the
reliability phases.
31
Figure 4: Bathtub curve (Garg & Deshmukh, 2006)
32
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
The previous chapter presents the literature on ILS and how it is implemented on the international
best practice. Each ILS element is unpacked to determine its influence on the ISL value chain. This
chapter provides the research methodology applied to acquire and analyse the data.
3.2 Data collection methodologies
Data is the information or material recorded and retained to validate the research findings (Jonathan
, 2012). The research data are collected, observed, created and analysed to produce concrete and
reliable results (Jonathan , 2012). According to (Hox & Boeije, 2005), two types of data exist;
secondary and primary data. Khothari (2004) defines secondary data as data readily available and
analysed. Primary data are collected afresh and for the first time (Khothari, 2004). For this research,
primary data were collected and analysed. A questionnaire technique is used as a methodology to
collect data.
3.3 Application of questionnaires methodology
The questionnaire provides effective means of collecting data on individuals’ beliefs, assertiveness,
motivations and behaviours or reactions on the research subject matter (Greenhalgh & Boynton,
2004). A questionnaire is an impartial tool for collecting data in the research exercise and is used by
the researchers, not familiar with the problems associated with the research subject matter (Abawi ,
2013) (Potter, et al., 2000). A well-structured questionnaire provides a potential and capability to
meet the research objectives and to minimise the level of unanswered questions. As suggested by
(Abawi , 2013) (Yin, 2004), the questionnaire should be structured properly ensuring the relevant
data is acquired and the respondent answers the question honestly and effortlessly. The
questionnaire methodology assists the researcher to obtain information from the large sample in the
field of research. It is also good in protecting the privacy of the respondents whereby the participant
shares some profound information (Potter, et al., 2000) (Greenhalgh & Boynton , 2004) (Corbetta ,
2003). The challenge on the questionnaires method is to make it clear and easy for all the
33
respondents and subsequently, the validity of the data depends on the honesty of respondents (Yin,
2004).
The questionnaire is conducted to source data from Transnet personnel on various levels and
functions. According to (Greenhalgh & Boynton , 2004), questionnaires can be used as a tool of
research and accurate findings can be obtained. On questionnaire approach, the questionnaire is e-
mailed and hand submitted to the respondents, requesting to return the completed template to all
questions.
3.4 Research methodology
According to (Abawi , 2013), research can be either qualitative or quantitative. Hox & Boeije (2005),
Khothari (2004) suggest that quantitative research approach centres on the expression of quantity
or amount whereas the qualitative research approach acquires underlying reasoning, opinions, and
perceptions in the research area. This research focuses on quantitative research approach
assessing the effectiveness of ILS and clarifies the principles of locomotive life-cycles. The prime
examples of the quantitative research are social surveys, case studies, and experiments evaluated
against the statistical strengths and weaknesses (Yin, 2004) (Khothari, 2004).
3.5 Developing questionnaires and scaling techniques
According to (Sato, 2005), questionnaire design is one of the common elements as it has a high
effect on the results or response from the respondents. It is possible that the same questions can
yield diverse results if they are asked in a different manner (Sato, 2005). The study by (Burton &
Steane, 2004), suggests that well-structured questionnaires can achieve more than a 50% response
rate, whereas poorly structured questionnaires can achieve a 5% response rate. Burton and Steane
(2004) believe that long questionnaires obtain poor response rate; thus, it should be short and
precise.
The Likert scale is used for this research to acquire data from respondents. According to (Khothari,
2004) (Beglar & Nemoto, 2014), the Likert scale is designed in a manner whereby an item is
34
evaluated and assessed on the basis of quality distinguishing between people providing high scores
and the those providing low scores. The Likert scale approach allows respondents to react
favourable, unfavourable or neutral towards questions on the research subject (Dawes, 2007)
(Khothari, 2004). Each response will be furnished with the numerical score indicating the level of
favourableness or unfavourableness. The score will be summarised, obtaining the overall reaction
of the respondents. Table 1 depicts the five-point scale used to rate agreement levels of respondents
towards the statements.
Table 1: Likert 5-point scale Strongly disagree Disagree
Unsure Agree Strongly agree
1 2 3 4 5
Negative Negative Neutral Positive Positive
The Likert scale ratings are explained in Table 2, to elaborate and explain each variable and its
differences.
Table 2: Likert scale description Scale code Scale Description 1 – Negative Strongly Disagree – Indicates that the respondent completely disagrees with the statement
and there is no room for any arguments. 2 – Negative Disagree – Indicates that the respondent disagrees with the statement but there is room for
arguments. 3 – Unsure Unsure – Indicates that respondents are fair-minded about the response due to the fact
that they do not have a clear answer, thus they do not want to be prejudice. 4 – Positive Agree – Indicates that the respondent agrees with the statement that the practice is
applicable in the environment. 5 – Positive Strongly Agree – Indicates that the respondent fully agrees with the statement that the
practice is highly applicable, and robustly plays a vital role in an environment.
3.6 Research process
A case study by (Yin, 2004) consider research as a systematic process of inquiring, analysing and
exploring the information. Research is used to resolve practical problems and boost the knowledge
level of the researcher (Khothari, 2004). The researcher should follow a research process and
methodology when conducting the research study, meeting an anticipated objective (Sato, 2005).
Figure 5 depicts the process that the researcher followed when conducting the research for this
study.
35
Figure 5: Research process [103]
3.7 Sample size and data saturation
The theory of data saturation was introduced in the research field by Glaser and Strauss (Ness &
Fusch , 2015). Data saturation is achieved when adequate information exists for an analysis of the
research subject. Data received after the saturated state will add minimal value to the total outcome
of the analysis. Failure in reaching the situation state has a negative impact on the quality and the
validity of the data received (Ness & Fusch , 2015) (Ditsele, 2015).
The study by (Thomson, 2011) reports that 100 articles were reviewed to assess the sample size
used in those researches. It is suggested that from 100 articles, 33 articles used sample size
between 20 and 30; 32 articles used sample size between 10 and 19; 22 used sample size of more
than 31; 12 articles used sample size of ≤10 and one article used sample size of >100. It is
determined that the average sample size of all the studies for 100 articles is 25, ranging from 5 to
114 (Thomson, 2011).
In this research the questionnaire is conducted with 110 respondents, aiming to receive a 75%
response rate, equating 83 responses. The total population involved in the locomotives support
36
process and maintenance is 245 employees assessed, from two Transnet maintenance depots. The
statistical method and principles are used to determine the acceptable sample size for this study:
𝑛 =𝑧2 .𝑝.𝑞.𝑁
𝑒2(𝑁−1)+(𝑧2.𝑝.𝑞) (Khothari, 2004)
Where: n = Sample size
N = size of population
e = Acceptable error
z= standard variate at a given confidence level.
P = sample proportion and q = 1 – p
A 95% confidence level was used, with a 2% estimation of acceptable error. The standard variation
is 1.645 as per area under the normal curve, with the confidence of 95% (Khothari, 2004). The p-
value is assumed to be 2% and the q-value is 1 – p. Therefore, the sample size used for this study
is determined as follows:
𝑛 =𝑧2 .𝑝.𝑞.𝑁
𝑒2(𝑁−1)+𝑧2.𝑝.𝑞 (Khothari, 2004)
= (1.64)2 (0.02). (1 − 0.02)(245)
(0.02)2(245 − 1) + (1.64)2(0.02). (1 − 0.02)
= 86 Participants
3.8 Data analysis approach
Data analysis is the process of applying statistical principles and logic techniques to make sense out
of data (Burton & Steane, 2004). The analysis process aimed to present the data in an intelligible
and illustratable manner determining the tendencies and relations in accordance with the literature
of the research. This includes grouping, summarising and demonstrating the data. Percentages and
averages are used to analyse data. An average is obtained through weighted approach calculations,
where 5 represents Strongly Agree and 1 represents Strongly Disagree. The formula used to
calculate the weighted average is as follows:
𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 =∑ 𝐴𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 % ×𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐿𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔
5 × 100 (Grela, 2013)
37
The total average is considered to determine the perception of respondents towards certain
questionnaire subjects. The targeted average score per question is ≥ 80%. If the response achieves
the targeted average score, the element will be deemed to be effective and if the response does not
achieve the targeted average score, the specific element will be deemed unsatisfactory or ineffective.
Response per category or designation will be considered to assess the correlations and differences
between management, employees and subsequently, dissect data based on employees’ seniority.
The data acquired will be represented in the form of graphs, tables, and charts. Analytical
descriptions and interpretations are provided, based on the visual presentation on the tables, graphs,
and charts.
3.9 Comparisons of questionnaires structure and literature review
The questionnaire is developed based on the context and lessons learned from an ILS literature
review in Chapter 2. A full questionnaire spreadsheet is attached in Appendix C.
Table 3: Questionnaire versus literature Question Number
Lessons Learnt from Literature Review Sources/Cases Study of reference
Question 2: Personnel age must be frequently monitored to minimise the shortage of personnel due to retirements
Duffuaa, S. et al., 2009. Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag London Limited.
Question 4: The locomotives maintenance processes and procedures must be clear and understood by the maintenance team
- Dhillon, B. S., 2002. Maintenance Engineering: A Modern Approach. 1ST ed. New York: CRC Press.
- Army, D. o. t., 2004. Maintenance Operations and procedures, Washington DC: Department of the Army , Headquaters.
Question 5: Effective locomotive maintenance plan must be in place to outlines the nature of maintenance to be conducted
Garg, A. & Deshmukh, S. G., 2006. Maintenance Management and Engineering, Delhi: Indian Institute of Technology.
Question 6: Effective Inventory management system must be in place to advise when to order and how much to order
Chukwuemeka, G. H. & Onwusoronye, U. O., 2013. Inventory Management: Pivotal in Effective and Efficient Organisations. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences, iv(1), pp. 115-120.
Question 7: Effective quality evaluation procedure should be applied ensuring that the delivered material is of acceptable quality standard and specification
Pycraft, M., Singh, H. & Phihlela, K., 2007. Operations Management. Cape Town: Pearson Education.
Question 8: The Locomotives failure rates must be known by all personnel involved in the locomotives life-cycle support process
- O'Connor, P. & Kleyner, A., 2012. Practical Reliability Engineering. 5th ed. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- Budin, K.-J., 2003. Managing Locomotive availability and utilization, s.l.: Transport No. RW-1.
38
Question 9: Effective system/technology must be in place to conduct Condition Based Maintenance to uplift the reliability level of locomotives
- Nappi, R., 2014. Integrated Maintenance: analysis and perspective of innovation in the railway sector, Naples: TT Solution.
- Szwedo, J. D., 2012. Preventive, corrective and predictive maintenance, Florida: Baxter & Woodman, Inc
Question 10: Training offered to the locomotives maintainers and operators must be remarkable
- Bekkering, W., 2004. Training and Teaching: Learn how to do it. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Tool.
- Blanchard, B. S., 1998. Logistics Engineering and Management-5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Question 11: Adequate training equipment must be in place to conduct required practical training
Question 12: There should be adequate personnel required who are fully trained and certified to conduct locomotives maintenance and operations at any given time.
Duffuaa, S. et al.., 2009. Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag London Limited.
Question 13: Effective forecasting model must be place used to determine the future required personnel capacity to support future maintenance and operations.
- Al-Shayea, A. M., 2012. Maintenance Capacity Planning: Determination of Maintenance Workforce. Science and Engineering Research, iv(3), pp. 37-43.
- Amtrak, 2011. Locomotives Maintenance Philosophy, California: California Department of Transportation.
Question 14: Maintenance workshop’s floor must be visibly demarcated with labelled of tools and material
OSHA, 2002. Floor Marking Guide, USA: Creative Safety Supply.
Question 15: The lighting and temperature in the workshop must be favourable
- HSE, 2010. Health and safety in engineering workshops, United Kingdom: Health and safety executives.
- Skansi, R., 2012. Ergonomics of Light, Serbia: GE Lighting.
3.10 Reliability and validity
Golafshani (2003), Khothari (2004) define reliability as an extent in which results are an accurate
representation of an entire population and are consistent. If similar results can be reproduced using
a similar methodology, the research instrument is deemed to be reliable. Golafshani (2003) suggests
that the consistency of respondents can be determined through test-retest methods at two different
times. The test-retest method is a stability measure ensuring the same results. Reliability can be
negatively impacted by errors of respondents when responding, influencing the score (Jokovic, et
al., 2002) (Golafshani, 2003).
The reliability of Likert scale in this research is substantiated by Cronbach’s alpha, determining the
degree of the quantity items in the questionnaire complementing and supplementing each other
(Gliem & Gliem, 2003). Cronbach’s alpha that is less than 0.6 is unacceptable, and Cronbach’s alpha
that is greater than 0.7 is acceptable (Gliem & Gliem, 2003). Validity determines whether outcomes
39
successfully measures what it is intended to measure, based on design and the reliability of the
study outcomes (Gliem & Gliem, 2003) (Jokovic, et al., 2002) (Khothari, 2004). A locomotive
maintenance managers reviewed the validity of ILS questions for this study, ensuring relevance to
the maintenance environment.
40
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA ANALYSIS
4.1 Introduction
The aim of this chapter is to present analysis and discussion of the data obtained from respondents.
The questionnaire was sent to 110 respondents. Ninety-five respondents participated in the
questionnaire equating to the 86% response rate of the sample size. The questionnaire was sent to
senior managers, middle managers, supervisors, and maintainers. Questionnaires were
communicated through e-mails, and some were hand-delivered to respondents without computer
facilities, more especially the respondents from the production floor. Fifteen sub-questions are
presented in the questionnaire spreadsheet, based on ILS literature.
4.2 Question 1: What is your working experience?
Experiences are categorised from one to 10 years (Low); 11 to 25 years (Medium) and ≥26 years
(High). The purpose of this question is to estimate experiences ranges within locomotive life-cycle
support teams. It can be established from Figure 6, that 22% represents the low experienced
respondents. The medium experienced contributes 36%, and high experienced contributes 42% to
the total respondents.
Figure 6: Question 1 responses
22%
36%
42% 1 – 10 Years
11 – 25 Years
26 and above Years
41
4.3 Question 2: What is your age?
The question of age categories is presented, evaluating the age of personnel from locomotive
maintenance and support functions. Figure 7 depicts that 20% of respondents are between 20 and
30 years. Respondents of 30 to 45 years are 63% of the respondents and the age group of 40 and
above contributed 17% of respondents. The international railway study reports that the locomotive
maintenance depots are facing challenges whereby 40% of the personnel are above the age of 50
years and 22% is 55 years. The railway industries are competing for the young engineers with other
sectors such as energy, construction, and automotive. The railway recruitment plan should earmark
the youngest professionals, growing within the organisation (Transport, 2016). Statistics from data
received, indicate that approximately 17% of locomotives maintenance personnel are ≥45 years.
Figure 7: Question 2 responses
4.4 Question 3: What is your designation?
The questionnaire was sent to senior managers, middle managers, supervisors, and maintainers.
Three (3%) senior managers, six (6%) middle managers, twelve (13%) supervisors and seventy-four
(78%) maintainers or operators participated in the survey as indicated in Figure 8. Nominated
participants are selected based on their involvement in locomotive maintenance and support
processes.
20%
63%
17%
20- 30 Years
30 - 45 Years
45 and above Years
42
Figure 8: Question 3 responses
4.5 Question 4: Are the locomotives maintenance processes and procedures
clear and understood by the maintenance team?
This question is asked to evaluate the complexity the maintenance process and procedures to the
respondents. The literature indicate that the entire maintenance team must understand the
maintenance process and procedures to effectively conduct the maintenance practices (Army,
2004). Respondents rate on the scale of one to five, where five represent strongly agree and one
represents strongly disagree. It can be seen from the Appendix A: Table 5 indicates the average
understanding of maintenance process and procedures by the respondents, is 94%. The average of
94% is influenced by 55% respondents being maintenance staff who strongly agree with the
statement and 21% agree as indicated in Figure 9. Furthermore, 12% of respondents are supervisors
and 6% are middle management who strongly agreed with the statement.
Most of the respondents irrespective of their experience scale, understand maintenance processes
and procedures. This might be influenced by the quality of training offered, supporting the
maintenance practice and locomotive handling. Highly experienced personnel are strategically
disseminated to operate on a regular basis with low experienced personnel; therefore, 98% of
respondents understand locomotive maintenance processes and procedures. In summary,
3%
6%
13%
78%
Senior ManagementMiddle ManagementSupervisorMaintainer/Operator
43
maintenance processes and procedures are understood by the personnel within locomotives
maintenance and support streams.
Figure 9: Question 4 responses
4.6 Question 5: Does Transnet have effective locomotive maintenance plans
that outline the nature of maintenance to be conducted?
This question is asked to assess if existing locomotive maintenance plans are effective to address
all kinds of maintenance conducted. All senior managers strongly agreed that the current
maintenance plans are effective to address all the maintenance activities on locomotives. Based on
Appendix A: Table 6, an average score of maintenance plan effectiveness is 93%. This average
score is reinforced by 53% of respondents being maintainers, 12% of respondents are supervisors
and 3% are middle managers who strongly agreed with the subject as indicated in Figure 10.
Furthermore, 22% of respondents are maintainers and 3% are middle managers who agreed that
the maintenance plans are effective.
StronglyAgree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly
DisagreeSenior Managers 2% 1% 0% 0% 0%Middle Managers 6% 0% 0% 0% 0%Supervisors 12% 1% 0% 0% 0%Maintainers/ Operators 55% 21% 1% 1% 0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%%
of r
espo
nden
ts
44
It can be established from Appendix B: Q5 that virtually all respondents reacted positively to the
effectiveness of locomotive maintenance plans. Some of the highly experienced respondents are
concerned with the execution and adherence to the maintenance plan.
Based on the positiveness of the responses, it is acknowledged that the locomotive maintenance
plans are effective.
Figure 10: Question 5 responses
4.7 Question 6: Is there an effective inventory management system that advises
when to order and how much to order?
This question is asked to probe the effectiveness of an inventory management system used to
conduct the planning and execution of material procurement. The average score for this statement
is 59% based on Appendix A: Table 7. Figure 11 depicts that senior management trust that the
inventory management system is effective. Respondents (33%) are maintainers and 7% are
supervisors disagreeing that an inventory management system is effective. Moreover, 19% of
respondents that are maintainers, strongly disagree that an inventory management system is
StronglyAgree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly
DisagreeSenior Managers 3% 0% 0% 0% 0%Middle Managers 3% 3% 0% 0% 0%Supervisors 12% 1% 0% 0% 0%Maintaners/ Operators 53% 22% 3% 0% 0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
% o
f res
pond
ents
45
effective. The disagreement is elevated by the shortage of material on the floor to conduct required
maintenance. Some respondents indicated, they sometimes use the cannibalisation approach
(stripping other locomotives spares to conduct maintenance activities on the required locomotive).
The shortage of material has a negative impact on the locomotives turnaround time as they spent
additional time in maintenance depots.
Reference to Appendix B: Q6, 58% of medium experienced respondents disagree. This
disagreement is supplemented by 68% highly experienced respondents. Furthermore, 57% equates
to 12 out of 21 of low experienced respondents also disagree that an inventory management system
is effective. Highly experienced respondents (25%); 35% medium experienced respondents and
43% low experienced respondents agree that an inventory management system is satisfactory.
Figure 11: Question 6 responses
StronglyAgree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly
DisagreeSenior Managers 1% 2% 0% 0% 0%Middle Managers 1% 4% 0% 1% 0%Supervisors 0% 3% 0% 7% 2%Maintaners/ Operators 9% 12% 5% 33% 19%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
% o
f res
pond
ents
46
4.8 Question 7: Is there effective quality evaluation procedure applied ensuring
that the delivered material is of acceptable quality standard and
specification?
This question is asked to assess how effective the quality evaluation methodology and procedure is
applied on maintenance material procured. Babel & Szkoda (2016) emphasise that spares and
material non-conformance to quality can impose reliability risks to the system. Appendix A: Table 8
indicates that an average score on the effectiveness of quality evaluation is 84%. Collective 93% of
respondents consider the quality evaluation procedures and methods effective; they allude that the
non-conformance materials are identified during material delivery process. Figure 12 indicates that
about 7% of respondents disagree with the effectiveness of a quality management process.
Figure 12: Question 7 responses
4.9 Question 8: Are the Locomotives reliability factors known and monitored?
This question is presented to investigate whether locomotives can run expected mean distance
before minimum failures occurred. The study by (Lee, et al., 2008) (Connor, 2012) suggests that
StronglyAgree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly
DisagreeSenior Managers 0% 3% 0% 0% 0%Middle Managers 4% 2% 0% 0% 0%Supervisors 4% 7% 0% 1% 0%Maintaners/ Operators 28% 43% 0% 6% 0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
% o
f res
pond
ents
47
locomotives reliability can either be measured by the Mean Time between Failure (MTBF) or Mean
Distance between Failures (MDBF). According to the Transnet reliability guideline, the locomotive is
deemed reliability if it accumulates less than 20 faults per million kilometres (Transnet, 2010). The
average score of 82% is obtained in this element as depicted in Appendix A: Table 9. Respondents
indicate that more than 80% of locomotives fleets can run one million kilometres and experience less
than 20 faults. Most of the ageing locomotives exceed 20 faults within a million kilometres of
operation.
Figure 13: Question 8 Responses
4.10 Question 9: Is there an effective system/technology used to conduct
condition based maintenance to uplift the reliability level of locomotives
This question is asked to assess the effectiveness of condition monitoring systems or devices for
locomotives at Transnet. According to Szwedo (2012), if the predictive maintenance is conducted
properly by a qualified person with adequate technologies to condition monitoring systems. An
organisation can reduce maintenance costs by ˃25%; eliminate ˃70% of breakdown; reduce the
FullyAgree Agree Unsure Disagree Fully
DisagreeSenior Managers 3% 0% 0% 0% 0%Middle Managers 3% 3% 0% 0% 0%Supervisors 11% 2% 0% 0% 0%Maintaners/ Operators 3% 69% 2% 3% 0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
% o
f tot
al re
spon
dent
s
48
down time by 45% and increase production rate by 25%. Responses from the survey on this element
achieved an average score of 91%, based on Appendix A: Table 10. Management and employees
believe locomotives condition monitoring systems in place, are effective.
Based on Appendix B: Q9, the effectiveness locomotives condition monitoring systems/technologies
are rated high by respondents in all experiences groups. Only one low experienced respondent
disagreed.
Figure 14: Question 9 responses
4.11 Question 10: Is the training offered to maintainers and operators
effective?
The purpose of this question is to assess the effectiveness level of training offered to the personnel
of locomotives maintenance. According to (Bekkering, 2004), effective training requirements are
compulsory in all the maintenance levels ensuring assets are supported seamlessly through
adequate maintenance management. Based on the responses on Appendix A: Table 11, an average
score for the effectiveness of personnel training is 96%. It is apparent that the training offered by
StronglyAgree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly
DisagreeSenior Managers 3% 0% 0% 0% 0%Middle Managers 2% 4% 0% 0% 0%Supervisors 7% 5% 0% 0% 0%Maintaners/ Operators 47% 27% 2% 1% 0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
% o
f res
pond
ents
49
Transnet is of adequate quality, as the maintainers acknowledged do not encounter any challenges
when they conduct their daily activities. From figure 15, it is presented that 80% of the respondents
strongly agree that the training is of high quality, whilst 20% agree that the training requirements are
effective enough to equip the personnel with the necessary skills to conduct required maintenance
activities. A scheduled refresher training exists, ensuring the personnel are retrained to sustain
knowledge and improve the quality of their work.
Figure 15: Question 10 responses
4.12 Question 11: Is adequate training equipment in place to conduct the
required practical training?
The purpose of this question is to assess the availability and effectiveness of the practical training
devices or equipment. According to a study by (Tsuruga, 2012), using effective training facilities,
such as simulators and mock-up for practical training, can successfully back up the classroom theory
and procedures. Tsuruga (2012) emphasise that training facilities must be used under the guidance
and supervision of a well-experienced instructor, aspiring motivation to trainees and reduce safety
StronglyAgree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly
DisagreeSenior Managers 3% 0% 0% 0% 0%Middle Managers 5% 1% 0% 0% 0%Supervisors 3% 9% 0% 0% 0%Maintaners/ Operators 68% 9% 0% 0% 0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
% o
f res
pond
ents
50
incidents. Based on responses results from Figure 16 and Appendix A: Table 12, an average score
on training facilities is 96%. The training facilities average score corresponds with an average score
of training effectiveness. Transnet uses effective simulators and physical locomotive to conduct
practical training to maintainers. Maintainers are satisfied with the practical training equipment used
to capacitate them on practical exposure of the locomotive.
Figure 16: Question 11 responses
4.13 Question 12: Is there enough personnel required, fully trained and
certified to conduct locomotives maintenance and operations at any time?
The purpose of this question is to determine whether the current personnel capacity is adequate to
conduct the required locomotives maintenance requirements. According to a study by (Duffuaa, et
al., 2009), insufficient maintenance personnel poses a risk of not meeting required targets.
Management should ensure that there is enough labour capacity required to perform the
maintenance activities. Based on results on Appendix A: Table 13, an average score for labour
capacity adequacy is 44%. It can be seen from Figure 17 that management considers the capacity
StronglyAgree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly
DisagreeSenior Managers 1% 2% 0% 0% 0%Middle Managers 4% 2% 0% 0% 0%Supervisors 4% 8% 0% 0% 0%Maintaners/ Operators 73% 5% 0% 0% 0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
% o
f res
pond
ents
51
adequate to conduct the plan and unplanned maintenance. Supervisors and maintainers indicate
that labour capacity is insufficient granted the workload. Figure 21 outlines that 66% of 74%
disagreeing respondents are maintainers or operator. They indicated that the current personnel
capacity is inadequate to fulfil the maintenance requirements. From 74% disagreeing respondents,
10% are supervisors who also underline that there is inadequate labour capacity to fulfil locomotive
maintenance requirements and support.
Appendix B: Q12 depicts that personnel capacity is inadequate. Highly experiences (90%)
respondents contribute to the disagreeing group. Medium experienced (91%) respondents and 67%
of low experienced respondents also disagree.
Figure 17: Question 12 responses
StronglyAgree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly
DisagreeSenior Managers 0% 3% 0% 0% 0%Middle Managers 1% 5% 0% 0% 0%Supervisors 0% 2% 0% 7% 3%Maintaners/ Operators 0% 3% 0% 66% 8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
% o
f res
pond
ents
52
4.14 Question 13: Is there an effective forecasting model in place, used to
determine the future required personnel capacity, supporting future
maintenance and operations?
This question is presented to assess the effectiveness of the labour forecasting model. Based on
the response on Appendix A: Table 14, the average score on effectiveness labour forecasting model
is 54%. It is evident that most of the personnel are unsure of the effectiveness of the labour
forecasting model. It is supposed that respondents rated the effectiveness of the forecasting model
low, based on the dissatisfaction of the current human capacity. It discovered that highly experienced
respondents contribute more percentage on the disagreeing respondents.
Figure 18: Question 13 responses
4.15 Question 14: Is the maintenance plant floor visibly demarcated with
labelled of tools and material?
The aim of this question is to assess if the workshop floor is clearly demarcated based on the
workshop health and safety standards. According to (OSHA, 2002), the workshop floor must be
StronglyAgree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly
DisagreeSenior Managers 0% 1% 0% 2% 0%Middle Managers 0% 2% 0% 3% 1%Supervisors 1% 4% 0% 7% 0%Maintaners/ Operators 0% 5% 53% 8% 12%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
% o
f res
pond
ents
53
clearly demarcated to mark the safe pathways and highlight hazardous areas to prevent accidents
and injuries. Based on the questionnaire responses on Appendix A: Table 15, the average score is
93%. Figure 19 depicts that 81% of respondents strongly agree and 11% agree that the floor
workshop is properly and visibly demarcated based on the 5S principles. However, there is 8% of
respondents who disagree that the floor is well demarcated.
With reference to Appendix B: Q15, the maintenance plant floor demarcation, and visibility are
satisfactory to most of the respondents. Five of 21 on low experienced respondents, two of 34 on
medium experienced respondents and one of 40 on highly respondents disagree that floor is visibly
demarcated. They advocated that the paint worn out in some sections and it should be resurrected.
Figure 19: Question 14 responses
StronglyAgree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly
DisagreeSenior Managers 3% 0% 0% 0% 0%Middle Managers 2% 4% 0% 0% 0%Supervisors 11% 1% 0% 1% 0%Maintaners/ Operators 65% 5% 0% 7% 0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
% o
f res
pond
ents
54
4.16 Question 15: Is the lighting and temperature in the workshop
favourable?
This question is asked to assess if employees are satisfied with working conditions such as workshop
temperature and lightings. Based on questionnaire responds on Appendix A: Table 16, an average
score on this question is 95%. Employees indicated they are satisfied with the lightings and the
temperature in the workshop. Figure 20 indicates that 81% strongly agree that the workplace
conditions, concerning lights and temperature are favourable, whilst 16% of respondents agreed that
indeed the lighting and temperature are satisfactory. There is 3% of respondents who believe that
the workshops are too cold during winter seasons and available heaters do not fully address the
problem.
Figure 20: Question 15 responses
4.17 ILS cross-referencing
Cross referencing is conducted based on the influence and the impact ILS Elements have on each
other. The ILS elements are dependent on each other to be effective. Ineffective elements can
impact the entire value chain of ILS. The figure below depicts the relationship and dependency of
StronglyAgree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly
DisagreeSenior Managers 2% 1% 0% 0% 0%Middle Managers 5% 1% 0% 0% 0%Supervisors 8% 4% 0% 0% 0%Maintaners/ Operators 65% 9% 0% 3% 0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
% o
f res
pond
ents
55
elements on each other. The cross-referencing is conducted between maintenance plan, manpower,
and inventory management.
Figure 21: ILS elements cross-referencing
Maintenance plan effectiveness recorded an average score of 93%. It is a concern that there is a
shortage of labour and spares based on Figure 21. Twenty percent and 29% of respondents
respectively highlight an inventory management system and labour capacity is inadequate.
According to the study by (Xiaobin, et al., 2007) (Hikmat, 2001), effective implementation of a
maintenance plan, strongly depends on the adequate labour and spares. Current labour and spare
capacity are inadequate to maintain existing fleet size of 2 438 locomotives. Transnet procures an
additional 1 064 locomotives. If the issue of labour and spares shortage is not resolved,
implementation of a maintenance plan will be unachievable.
56
4.18 Management versus workers observations
Management versus employees’ perceptions and observations are analysed to determine their
differences and correlations. Figure 22 depicts observations trends for management and employees
on ILS elements. The analysis is conducted on inventory management system and labour.
Figure 22: Employees versus management perceptions
A scholar, Vithessonthi (2005) presents that management and employees do not share the same
view and perceptions. Employees’ perceptions were assessed versus management perception, on
two of the ILS element; inventory management system and labour adequacy. As depicted in Figure
22, 88% of labourers indicated that the labour is inadequate, granted the maintenance workload,
whereas all managers suggested that labour is adequate. All managers believed that an inventory
management system is effective whereas 68% of labourers highlighted that inventory management
systems are ineffective as a significant shortage exist, of spares on the floor and warehouse. In a
nutshell, management has a perception that the production line functions smoothly entirely, whereas
employees had a diverse view.
57
4.19 Satisfactory and unsatisfactory elements analysis
The aim of this section is to summarise findings of the responses on the questionnaire from Question
4 to Question 15. Twelve questions are categorised as subsets to the main elements to determine
the overall effectiveness of elements as depicted in Table 4. For this research, the researcher has
set the target of an average score of ≥80% per question or subject. If an average score of ≥80% is
achieved, it is assumed that the particular element is satisfactory or effective and if the average score
is ≤80%, indicating that the element under examination is ineffective. Elements that have achieved
≤80% require improvement. Table 4 indicates that four of six elements achieved an average score
of ≥80% and two of six elements did not meet the targeted average score. These are elements that
management should improve to uplift the entire supply chain of locomotives life-cycle support.
Elements that are unsatisfactory are:
Effective Inventory management system – an inventory management system are deemed
ineffective by the respondents. There is shortage of spare components to fulfil locomotives
maintenance requirements. The ILS literature indicates that there should be an effective
inventory management model that advices when to order and the quantity to order (Grondys,
2010) (Chukwuemeka & Onwusoronye, 2013) (Telsang, 2001).
Adequacy of Labour capacity – the outcome of the survey indicates that the current labour
capacity is inadequate to conduct the maintenance practice, granted the workload. There are
conflicting views between employees and management on this subject. Management believe
that the current workforce is adequate to fulfil the maintenance requirements, whereas
employees have different views.
Table 4: Average score target versus actual average score
ILS Elements Sub Questions and the results
Average Results per element
Maintenance plan effectiveness o Q 4 = 94% o Q5 = 93% o Q9 = 91%
93%
Training Effectiveness o Q10 = 96% o Q11 = 96%
96%
Reliability Management o Q8 = 82% 82% Inventory Management Systems Effectiveness
o Q6 = 59% o Q7 = 84%
72%
Maintenance Facility Readiness o Q14 = 93% 94%
58
o Q15 = 95%
Labour Adequacy o Q12 = 44% o Q13 = 54%
49%
59
CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Introduction
The overruling purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of ILS in the railway sector,
specifically in the locomotive life-cycle support. The problem statement within the railway sector has
been discussed in the introductory chapter of this study. TFR procures the total of 1 064 locomotives
to improve operational efficiency and attract potential business within the logistics sector.
The study assesses the effectiveness of ILS elements, supporting existing locomotive fleets,
subsequently the additional locomotives at Transnet. The concept of ILS was defined in Chapter 2.
The definition of ILS centres on the readiness of an organisation supporting the life-cycle of the
system cost-effectively.
The questionnaire is used as a research methodology for this study. Questionnaires are developed
using the one- to five-point Likert scale, where five represents strongly agree with the statement
being raised on elements of ILS. Questionnaires were sent, using e-mails to respondents and other
questionnaires were distributed through hand submission, more especially to the respondents in the
workshop. Questionnaires were presented to the sample of 110 respondents involved in the
locomotive life-cycle support process. Ninety-five respondents participated in the survey. Of the 95
respondents, 74 Maintainers, 12 Supervisors, 6 Middle Managers and 3 Senior Managers. The
questionnaire comprises 15 questions, developed on the literature of ILS and questions ranged from
biodata, technical and managerial. Through this research approach, data are received from
respondents and analysis is conducted to assess the effectiveness of each element. The weighted
average is used to deduce the status quo for ILS subject of study within Transnet.
5.2 Conclusion and discussion
The main objective of this study is to evaluate and assess how ILS is implemented within the Railway
sector and subsequently evaluate the effectiveness of each ILS element to support the locomotives
lifecycle. Furthermore, the study aim to evaluate the perceptions differences between management
60
and employees on ILS implementation status quo. Transnet is used as the study area where the
locomotives life-cycle support is considered as a theme of study. The conclusion on the effectiveness
of ILS elements is presented together with perceptions from management and employees.
Maintenance plan effectiveness
The locomotive maintenance plan is effective based on the response from the questionnaire
participants. It addresses time-based maintenance and condition based maintenance to keep the
locomotives reliable. The maintenance plan is revised if there is a new locomotive in the system.
The locomotive maintenance plan is automated; thus, it is easier to manage all the locomotives
maintenance practices.
Most of the respondents indicated they understand the maintenance process and procedure in their
respective departments. Management indicated a breakdown of activities, ensuring the maintainers
find it easy to conduct their job. Highly experienced labourers assigned to work with less experienced
labourers for knowledge sharing is strategic.
A collective 97% of respondents believed that the condition monitoring systems are effective. The
respondents indicated that system assists in determining the type and the level of maintenance that
need to be conducted on the locomotives. Management also indicated failure rates of locomotives
are significantly reduced as the system detects the failure timeously. Based on international best
practice on ILS, condition monitoring system must be in place to save the cost of system
maintenance.
Effectiveness of inventory management system
The supervisors and maintainers suggest that the inventory management system is ineffective. A
significant shortage of spares in the production line exists. They also indicated they have to
cannibalise ensuring they proceed with the locomotives maintenance. The spare shortage can
negatively impact the business because production can delay. However, the material quality
evaluation procedure and processes are effective based on the respondents’ average score.
61
Reliability management
The locomotive reliability in Transnet is measured by 20 faults per million kilometres. If the locomotive
is deemed reliable, it accumulates less than 20 faults per million kilometres. Based on responses
from the maintenance team, more than 80% of locomotives meet reliability standards though some
of the older locomotive fleets have reliability challenges.
Training effectiveness
The labourers are satisfied with the training presented to them. The training is of high quality because
they can conduct the fault diagnosis and maintenance with no significant challenge. The OEM is
availed to project managers as warranty management contract for two years to work with Transnet
employees and share additional skills in conducting maintenance practice. It is also deduced that
the locomotive training equipment is effective. Employees indicated they are contented with the
training equipment and facilities. Simulations are used in training centres, providing practical training,
and the physical locomotive is used for practical assessments.
Labour capacity adequacy
The current personnel capacity is insufficient to perform the work. The labourers on the floor are
inadequate to perform the volume of work, whilst management believes that the current capacity is
adequate to conduct the work imminent. This issue will get more critical as deploying the additional
locomotive will add more work to an inadequate personnel capacity.
The responses provide an awareness that the recruitment forecasting model in is ineffective. The
forecasting model is not aligned with future locomotives maintenance requirements. An ineffective
recruitment model negatively impacts the production rate because the labourers on the production
line are inadequate to conduct required amount of work. The other underpinning challenge is that
the recruitment process takes longer than expected.
62
The international railway study indicates that locomotives maintenance depots are facing challenges
whereby 40% of personnel are over the age of 50 years and 22% of the population is over 55 years
(Transport, 2016). Based on the survey study in Transnet, it is deduced that approximately >83% of
personnel are between 25 and 50 years; thus, there will be no significant amount of retirements
soon.
Maintenance facility readiness
The responses from the questionnaire based on this question indicate that the shop floor
demarcations in the workshops are of acceptable standards. Demarcated areas are present,
signalling the hazardous areas and pathways. A lean manufacturing office applies 5S and continuous
improvements in the workshop.
It is also deduced that lightings and temperature are favourable to labourers. The score is positive;
thus, the researcher can conclude that workshops setups comply with International Workshop Health
and Safety acts.
Management versus employees perceptions on ILS implementation
Employees’ perceptions were assessed versus management perception, on two of the ILS element;
inventory management system and labour adequacy. Twenty-three percent of labourers indicated
that the labour is inadequate, granted the maintenance workload, whereas all managers suggested
that labour is adequate.
All managers believed that an inventory management system is effective whereas 68% of labourers
highlighted that inventory management systems are ineffective as a significant shortage exist, of
spares on the floor and warehouse. In summary, management has a perception that the production
line functions smoothly entirely, whereas employees have a diverse view.
5.3 Recommendations
Recommendations on this study are based on the data received from the questionnaire co-
operatively with the ILS literature. Lessons are learned from this research implementation. Below
63
are the recommendations and lessons learned on the research methodology and data collection
exercise:
It is recommended that survey questionnaires must be simplified to avoid ambiguity.
E-mails are not convenient for surveys because the response rate is slow. It is advisable to use
other media of communication to acquire data. Hand-delivery is more appropriate.
It is crucial to validate questionnaire with subject matters experts to sustain relevance of the
study to the field.
Some of the respondents are agitated to participate in a survey; thus, it is significant to request
the line managers providing awareness about the survey exercise so that the respondents can
be comfortable.
Respondents are likely to be biased or dishonest if not provided enough time to comprehend the
gist of a question and provides an honest answer. Therefore, it is important to provide adequate
time to the respondents to analyse questions and provide their truthful answer.
In this research, follow-up questions were randomly asked. If the respondent awards the
minimum score of 1 (strongly disagree) or the maximum score of 5 (strongly agree). The
researcher randomly requested the underpinning reasons or rationale why respondents strongly
agreed or strongly disagreed.
It is discovered from the data received that some of the ILS elements are not effective. Holistically,
ILS elements function complementarily, comparing to puzzle pieces with an objective of creating a
single picture. If one element is not effective, it negatively impacts the entire value chain of the ILS
application. A research identified elements ineffectively implemented and provides the following
recommendations:
Insufficient labour – as a short-term remedy, management should conduct a line balancing,
ensuring that labourers are adequately allocated to increase productivity. Redundant employees
should be redeployed to other functions where a shortage of personnel exists, to balance the
performance rate and reduce time to completion (TTC).
64
It is recommended that management should consider adopting the automated labour forecasting
model. The model synchronises labour requirements with maintenance workload based on the
maintenance plan. It develops and monitors the balance between labour and the workload.
Ineffective inventory management system – it is concluded that a shortage of material exists in
several sections based on the responses from respondents. The supposed cause of the material
shortage is ineffective inventory management system. Therefore, it is recommended that
management conduct root causes analyses to mitigate factors that negatively affect the inventory
management application.
65
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aje, J., 2008. Application of TQM to Engineering Management Program. Maryland, University of
Maryland.
Akorede, M. & Amuda, S., 2014. competitive preliminary research proposal. s.l., s.n.
Kutlu , A. C. & Kadaifci, C., 2014. Analyzing critical success factors of total quality management by
using fuzzy cognitive mapping. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, XXVII(5), pp. 561-
575.
Murray, M., Ferreira, L. & Simson, S., 2001. Rail Track Maintenance Planning. Transportation
Research Board, ii(1).
Abawi , K., 2013. Data Collection Instruments, Switzerland: Geneva Foundation for Medical
Education and Research.
Adler, L., 2002. Systems Approach to Marketing. Harvard Business Review, XLV(3), pp. 105-118.
Ahuja, R. et al., 2002. Solving Real-Life Locomotive Scheduling Problems, Cambridge: MIT Sloan
School of Management.
Ait-Kadi, D. & Chelbi , A., 2014. Analysis of a production/inventory system with randomly failing
production unit submitted to regular preventive maintenance. European Journal of Operational
Research, Issue 156, p. 712–718.
Al-Shayea, A. M., 2012. Maintenance Capacity Planning: Determination of Maintenance Workforce.
Science and Engineering Research, iv(3), pp. 37-43.
Amtrak, 2011. Locomotives Maitenance Philosophy, California: California Department of
Transportation.
Andersen, P., 2011. Rolling Stock: Locomotives and Rail Cars, United States : United States
International Trade Commission.
Antony, J. V., 2014. Enabling Predictive Maintenance Strategy in Rail Sector. Wseas Transactions
on computer, Volume 13, pp. 2224-2872.
Army, D. o. t., 2004. Maintenance Operations and procedures, Washington DC: Department of the
Army , Headquaters.
Army, D. o. t. A., 2013. Diesel-Electrical Operations and Maintenance, Washington DC: Department
of the Army.
66
Babbitt, G., 2000. The Historical review of Integrated Logistic support charter, USA: Defense
Systems Management School.
Babel, M. & Szkoda, M., 2016. Diesel locomotive efficiency and reliability improvement as a result
of power unit load control system modernisation. Maintenance and Reliability , XVIII(1), p. 38–49.
Baek, S.-H., Cho, S.-S., Kim, H.-S. & Joo, W.-S., 2009. Reliability design of preventive maintenance
scheduling for cumulative fatigue damage. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, IV(1),
pp. 1225 - 1233.
Baek, S., Lee, K., Cho, S. & Joo, W. S., 2007. Reliability-Based Optimization for Fatigue
Maintenance Planning of Freight Car. Key Engineering Materials, cccxlv(2), pp. 1369-1372,.
Beglar, D. & Nemoto, T., 2014. (2014). Developing Likert-scale questionnaires. In N. Sonda & A.
Krause (Eds.),. Japan , Temple University.
Bekkering, W., 2004. Training and Teaching: Learn how to do it. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Tool.
Bérengu, C., Dieulle, L. & Grall, A., 2002. Continuous-Time Predictive-Maintenance Scheduling for
a Deteriorating System. Transation on Reliability, l(2), pp. 141-150.
Blanchard, B. S., 1998. Logistics Engineering and Management-5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Bouachera, T., 2012. Whole life cost optimisation with ILS considerations, United Kingdom: Robert
Gordon University.
Braglia, M. & Zavanella, L., 2003. Modelling an industrial strategy for inventory management in
supply chains. int. j. prod. res, LXXII(16), p. 3793–3808.
Budin, K.-J., 2003. Managing Locomotive availability and utilization, s.l.: Transport No. RW-1.
Burton, S. & Steane, P., 2004. Surviving Your Thesis. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
Bussieck, M., 1998. Optimal Lines in Public Rail Transport, Germany: Federal Ministry for Education,
Science, Research and Technology.
Bussieck, M. R., Winter, T. & Zimmermann, U. T., 2001. Discrete Optimization on Public Rail
Transportation, German: German Rail Transportation.
Chen, F., 2005. alesforce Incentives, Market Information, and Production/Inventory Planning.
Management Science, lxxxii(1), p. 60–75.
Cheng, Y.-H., Yang, A. S. & Tsao, H.-L., 2012. Study Of Rolling Stock Maintenance Strategy and
Spare Parts Management, Taiwan: Shu-Te University.
67
Chukwuemeka, G. H. & Onwusoronye, U. O., 2013. Inventory Management: Pivotal in Effective and
Efficient Organizations. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences, iv(1), pp.
115-120.
Connor, P., 2012. Railway System,Technologies and operations accross the world. [Online]
Available at: http://www.railway-technical.com/rstock.shtml
[Accessed 3 September 2016].
Corbetta , P., 2003. Social Research. Theory, Methods and Techniques. 1st ed. London: Sage.
DA, 2008. Integrated Logistics Support-Army Regulation, United State: Department of Army.
Dawes, J., 2007. Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used?.
International Journal of Market Research, l(1).
Dhillon, B. S., 2002. Maintenance Engineering: A Modern Approach. 1ST ed. New York: CRC Press.
Dictionary, B., 2016. Cycle Inventory. [Online]
Available at: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/cycle-inventory
[Accessed 2 August 2016].
Ditsele, S., 2015. Reliability Project Optimazation: South African Case Study (M.Eng),
Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.
DoD, 2007. The Defense Acquisition System , United States : Department of Defense .
Dorai, V., Flores, B. & Olson, D., 2013. Management of multicriteria inventory classification. Mathl.
Comput. Modelling, XVI(12), pp. 71-82.
Duffuaa, S. et al., 2009. Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering. 1st ed. New York:
Springer-Verlag London Limited.
Edirisinghe , E. A. & Faiz , R. B., 2009. Decision Making for Predictive Maintenance in Asset
Information Management, United Kingdom: Loughborough University.
Edkins, G. & Pollock, C., 1997. The influence of the sustained attention on railway incidents. Acident
Analysis and prevension, XXIX(4), pp. 533-539.
Ellis, B. A., 2008. Condition Based Maintenance. TJP, i(2), pp. 1-5.
Europe, L. R. R., 2007. Training needs and offers in the European railway area, Europe: Danish
Technological Institute.
68
Fredendall, L. D., Patterson, W. & Kennedy, W., 2002. An overview of recent literature on spare
parts inventories. Int. J. Production Economics, Issue 76, p. 201–215.
Gandhare, S. N., Madankar, T. A. & Ikhar, D. R., 2014. Re-Scheduling Of Maintenance Tasks for
Diesel Locomotive. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, I(II), pp. 47-54.
Garg, A. & Deshmukh, S. G., 2006. Maintenance management and Engineering, Delhi: Indian
Institute of Technology.
General, A., 2011. Audits of Rolling Stock Maintananceby Botswana Railway, Botswana: Botswana
Railway.
Glidewell , L., Robertson , C., Johnston, M. & Francis , J. J., 2010. What is an adequate sample
size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology & Health,
25(x), pp. 1229-1245.
Gliem, J. & Gliem, R., 2003. Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability
Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. united states, Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult,
Continuing, and Community Education.
Golafshani, N., 2003. Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative
Report, viii(4), pp. 597- 606.
Greenhalgh , T. & Boynton , P., 2004. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaires. s.l.,
Bmj.
Greenhalgh, T. & Boynton, P. M., 2004. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire.
BMJ, i(328), pp. 1312-1315.
Grela, G., 2013. Does Weighted Average Really Work?. Poland, s.n.
Grimes, G. . A. & Barkan, . C., 2006. Cost-Effectiveness of Railway Infrastructure Renewal
Maintenance. Transport Engineering, i(1), pp. 601-608.
Grondys, K., 2010. ABC Analysis in spare parts warehouse, Poland: Czestochowa University of
Technology.
Hikmat, A. N., 2001. The Problem of Surplus and Shortage of Manpower in Developing Countries,
Saudi Arabia: King Abdul-Aziz University.
Hox, J. & Boeije, H., 2005. Data Collection, Primary vs. Secondary , Netherland: Utrecht University.
69
HSE, 2010. Health and safety in engineering workshops, United Kingdom: Health and safety
executives.
Hutchinson, N. E., 2000. An Integrated Approach to Logistics Management. 1st ed. New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall.
Instanbul, M., 2016. Rolling Stock Maintenance. [Online]
Available at: http://www.metro.istanbul/about-us/activities/vehicle-maintenance.aspx
[Accessed 1 September 2016].
Jokovic, A., Locker, D. & Stephens, M., 2002. Validity and Reliability of a Questionnaire for
Measuring Child Oral-health-related Quality of Life. Journal of Dental Research, 1(i).
Jonathan , T., 2012. Research Data - Definitions, United Kingdom: University of Leicester.
Jones, V., 2006. Integrated Logistics Support Handbook. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill
Professional.
Jua, L.-S. & Changa, H.-L., 2008. Effect of consecutive driving on accident risk. Accident Analysis
and Prevention, ii(40), p. 1844–1849.
Kanawaty, G., 2002. Introduction to Workstudy. Johannesburg: Skotaville Publisher.
Khothari, C. R., 2004. Reserch Methodology. 3rd ed. Daryaganj: New Age International (P) Limited.
Krivtsov, V., Kaminskiy, M. & Mohammad, M., 1999. Reliability Engineering and Risk Analysis. 4th
ed. New York: Marcel Decker.
Lambert, K. R., 2008. Integrated Logistics Support system within high tecnology industries, South
Africa: Unisa.
Lambert, K. R., 2008. The Development of a framework for an ILS system within a high technology
industry in a developing country, South Africa: Unisa.
Lar, F., Garcı´a-Sabater, J., Poler, R. & Mula, J., 2006. Models for production planning under
uncertainty: A review. Int. J. Production Economics, i(1), p. 271–285.
Latha, M., 2006. Research Methodology, India: Pondicherry University.
Lee, J., Xi, L. & Zhou, X., 2008. Reliability Centered Predictive Maintenance Scheduling for a
Continuously Monitored System Subject to Degradation, Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Lindfeldt, O., 2010. Railway operation analysis , Sweden: Uppsala University.
70
Lyson, D. & Laggan, P., 2011. Application of predictive maintenance techniques on the utility
systems. The Official Magazine of ISPE, 30 December.XXXI(6).
Marten Jr, F. A., 2010. Reliability Centered Maintenance, Phoneix: Mineta Transportation Institute
Publications.
Mayville, R. A., Stringfellow, . R. G., Johnson, . K. N. & Landrum, S., 2013. Crashworthiness Design
Modifications for Locomotive and Cab Car Anticlimbing Systems , United State: U.S. Department of
Transportation .
Meeker, W., 2013. Reliability Meets Big Data, United States: Iowa State University.
Merriam, S., 2005. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. Gorgia: San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass..
Milutinović, D. & Lučanin, V., 2005. Relation between Reliability and Availability of Railway Vehicles,
Nemanjina: Serbian Railway.
Mobley, K., 2002. An introduction to predictive maintenance. United States of America: BBritish
Library Cataloguing.
Murthy, D., Atrens , A. & Eccleston, J., 2002. Strategic Maintenance Management. Journal of Quality
in Maintenance Engineering, 8(IV), pp. 287-305.
Nakagawa, T., 2006. Optimal policy of continuous and discrete replacement with minimal repair at
failure, Nagoya: Naval Research Logistics Quarterly.
Nappi, R., 2014. Integrated Maintenance: analysis and perspective of innovation in railway sector,
Naples: TT Solution.
Nash, C., Chen , H. & Xie, R., 2000. The Migration of Railway Freight Transport from Command
Economy to Market Economy: The Case of China, England: Institute for Transport Studies,
University of Leeds.
Ness, L. & Fusch , P., 2015. Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research. How To
Article, xx(9), pp. 1408-1416.
Ng, W. L., 2007. A simple classifier for multiple criteria ABC analysis. European Journal of
Operational Research, i( 177 ), p. 344–353.
Noe, R. A., 2010. Employee Training & Development (Irwin Management). 5th ed. New York:
McGraw Hill Higher Education.
71
Nulty, D. D., 2008. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Taylor & Francis, XXXIII(3), p.
301–314.
O'Connor, P. & Kleyner, A., 2012. Practical Reliability Engineering. 5th ed. United Kingdom: John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OECD, 2013. Recent Developments in Rail Transportation Services, Europe : OECD .
Olievschi, V. N., 2013. Framework for improving railway sector performance in sub-Saharan Africa,
Morocco: SSATP.
OSHA, 2002. Floor Marking Guide, USA: Creative Safety Supply.
Ouyang, Y. & Xie, W., 2015. Locomotive at right workshop, with right capacity and capability, United
States: CSX Transportation.
Ozdemirb, G. & Eroglua, A., 2007. An economic order quantity model with defective items and
shortages. Int. J. Production Economics, i(1), p. 544–549.
Palo, M., 2014. Condition-Based Maintenance for Effective and Efficient Rolling Stock Capacity
Assurance, Sweden: Luleå University of Technology.
Pettit, T. J., Fiksel , J. & Croxton, K. L., 2010. Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a
concept framework. Journal of Business Logistics, xxx(1), pp. 1-22.
Phelan, J., Kilian, K., Mazur, V. & Ripley, I., 2014. Condition monitoring of rolling stock as the core
fleet maintenance strategy. Australia, s.n.
Polad, F. S. & Meher-Homji, C. B., 2003. The Application of Integrated LogisticsSupport Concepts
in Energy Project Planning. Houston, Boyce Engineering International.
Potter, D. R., Sharpe, K. M., Hendee , J. C. & Clark, R. N., 2000. Questionnaires for research, United
State: U. S. Department of Agriculture.
Powell, W. B. & Bouzaiene‐Ayari, B., 2013. Strategic, Tactical and Real‐Time Planning of
Locomotives at Norfolk Southern Using Approximate Dynamic Programming, Atlanta: Princeton
University.
Predikto, 2012. Predicting failures in locomotives, Atlanta: Predikto.
Pretorius, P., 2006. How Integrated is Integrated Logistics?. The South African Journal of Industrial
Engineering, XXVII(4), pp. 11-16.
72
Pycraft, M., Singh, H. & Phihlela, K., 2007. Operations Management. Cape Town: Pearson
Education.
Quayle, M., 2000. Logistics: An Integrated Approach. Sevenoaks: Tudor Business Publishing.
Rao, U., Swaminathan, J. & Jun, Z., 2004. Multi-product inventory planning with downward
substitution, stochastic demand and setup costs. IIE Transactions, ii(36), p. 59–71.
Robeson, J., Copacino, W. & Howe , R., 2001. The Logistics Handbook. 1st ed. New York: The Free
Press. Maxwell Macmillan International.
RSR, 2014. State of Safety report, Johannesburg: Rail Safety Regulator.
Sani, M. A. & MD Dawal, Z. S., 2010. Future Human Performance Model for Malaysian Train Driver.
Hong kong, UM Research University Special Grant.
Sato, Y., 2005. Questionnaires design for survey research, Japan: Mie Chukyo University.
Singh, Y. K., 2006. The Fundamental Research Methology and statistics. 1st ed. Daryaganj: New
Age International Limited.
Skansi, R., 2012. Ergonomics of Light , Serbia: GE Lighting.
Standards, F., 2015. Encyclopedia. [Online]
Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Availability_(system)
[Accessed 4 September 2016].
Szkoda, M., 2014. Analysis of reliability,availability and maintenability (RAM) of SM48 diesel
locomotives. 22nd International Symposium, I(3), pp. 31-864.
Szwedo, J. D., 2012. Preventive, corrective and predictive maintenance, Florida: Baxter &
Woodman, Inc.
Tarum, C. D., 2014. Classification and Analysis of Weibull Mixtures, USA: Delphi Automotive
Systems.
Taylor, J., 2015. Preliminary Element Integrated Logistics Support Plan, England: University of
Cambridge.
Telsang, M., 2001. Industrial Engineering and Production Management, New Delhi: S. Chand &
Company Ltd.
Teshome, M., 2012. Modelling and Analysis of Reliability and Long Run Availability of a Fleet of
Rolling Stock, Enschede: University of Twente.
73
Teunter, R. H. & Syntetos, A. A., 2009. ABC Classification: Service Levels and Inventory Costs.
Production and Operations Management Society, i(1), pp. 1058-1098.
TheWorldBank, 2011. Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance, Washington
DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development .
Thomson, S. B., 2011. Sample Size and Grounded Theory. Journal of Administration & Governance
, 5(i).
Thorlacius, P., 2015. Rolling Stock Planning at DSB S-tog - Processes, Cost Structures and
Requirements, Danmark: Technical University Of Danmark.
Tjora, A., 2011. Writing small discoveries. [Online]
Available at: http://www.sagepub.com/gray/Website%20material/Journals/tjora.pdf
[Accessed 7 June 2015].
Transnet, 2010. Transnet Rail Engineering Annual Report, Johanneburg: Transnet.
Transnet, 2013. Procurement of 1064 Locomotives for the General Freight Business, Johannesburg:
Transnet.
Transnet, 2015. Africa Transport Infrastructure Planning, Joannesburg: Transnet.
Transport, D. o., 2016. Rolling Stock Perspective, Britain: Britian Railway.
Transport, D. o. T., 2016. Rolling Stock Perspective, Britain: Britian Railway - Department of
Transport.
Tsao, H.-L. & Cheng, Y.-H., 2010. Rolling
stockmaintenancestrategyselection,sparesparts’estimation,and replacements’intervalcalculation.
International Journal of Production Economics, i(128), p. 404–412.
Tsuruga, K., 2012. Effective Use of Plant Simulators and Mock-up Facilities for Cultivation and
Training of Younger Regulators, Japan : Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization.
Tu, P., Li , L., Tse, P. & Yam, R. C. M., 2001. Intelligent Predictive Decision Support System for
Condition-Based Maintenance. International Journal Adv Manufacturing Technology, Issue 17, p.
383–391.
van Dongena, L. & Busstraa, M., 2015. Creating value by integrating logistic trains services and
maintenance activities. Netherlands, Science Direct.
74
Vithessonthi, C., 2005. A Perception-Based View of the Employee:, Switzerland: University of St.
Gallen.
Walker, R., Lang, R., Chapman, S. & Tournay, H., 2014. The algorithms in support of detector-based
predictive rolling stock maintenance, United State of America: Transportation Technology Centre.
Weiss, M., 2013. Challenges of Matching Maintenance Programs to an Aging Rolling Stock Fleet.
Canada, s.n.
WiproLTD, 2014. Maintenance Forecasting, Bangalore: Wipro Technologies.
WiproLTD, 2014. Maintenance Forecasting of aircrafts, Bangalore: Wipro Technologies.
Xiaobin, W., Wansheng, T. & Ruiqing, Z., 2007. Fuzzy Economic Order Quantity Inventory Models
Without Backordering. Tsinghua Science and Technology, XII(1), pp. 91-96.
Yao, J., Rong, Z. & Guo, S., 2013. Reliability Modeling and Assigning Method for HXD Electric
Locomotive. Beijing, China Academy of Railway Sciences.
Yao, X., Fernández-Gaucherand,, E., Fu, M. C. & Marcus, S. I., 2004. Optimal Preventive
Maintenance Scheduling in Semiconductor Manufacturing. Transations on semiconductor
manufacturing, xvii(3).
Yin, K., 2004. Case study research: Design and methods, London: Sage.
Zhang, Z., Gao, W., Zhou, Y. & Zhang, Z., 2012. Reliability Modeling and Maintenance Optimization
of the Diesel System in Locomotives. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability,
xiv(4), p. 302–311.
75
APPENDIX A: TABULAR DATA ANALYSIS
Table 5: Question 4 Analysis
Table 6: Question 5 Analysis
Senior Managers
Middle Managers
Super visors
Maintainers/ Operators ∑ Agreement%
5-Levels Rating Average
Strongly Agree 3 3 11 50 71% 5 3.5 Agree 0 3 1 21 26% 4 1.1 Unsure 0 0 0 3 3% 3 0.1 Disagree 0 0 0 0 0% 2 0.0 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 0% 1 0.0
Weighted Average 93% Table 7: Question 6 Analysis
Senior Managers
Middle Managers
Super visors
Maintainers/ Operators ∑ Agreement%
5-Levels Rating Average
Strongly Agree 1 1 0 9 12% 5 0.6 Agree 2 4 3 11 21% 4 0.8 Unsure 0 0 0 5 5% 3 0.2 Disagree 0 1 7 31 41% 2 0.8 Strongly Disagree 0 0 2 18 21% 1 0.2
Weighted Average 52%
Table 8: Question 7 Analysis
Senior Managers
Middle Managers
Super visors
Maintainers/ Operators ∑ Agreement%
5-Levels Rating Average
Strongly Agree 0 4 4 27 37% 5 1.8 Agree 3 2 7 41 56% 4 2.2 Unsure 0 0 0 0 0% 3 0.0 Disagree 0 0 1 6 7% 2 0.1 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 0% 1 0.0
Weighted Average 84%
Table 9: Question 8 Analysis
Senior Managers
Middle Managers
Super visors
Maintainers/ Operators ∑ Agreement%
5-Levels Rating
Average Fully Agree 3 3 10 3 20% 5 1.0 Agree 0 3 2 66 75% 4 3.0 Unsure 0 0 0 2 2% 3 0.1 Disagree 0 0 0 3 3% 2 0.1 Fully Disagree 0 0 0 0 0% 1 0.0 Average 82%
Senior Managers
Middle Managers Supervisors
Maintainers/ Operators ∑ Agreement%
5 Level Rating Average
Strongly Agree 2 6 11 52 75% 5 3.7 Agree 1 0 1 20 23% 4 0.9 Unsure 0 0 0 1 1% 3 0.0 Disagree 0 0 0 1 1% 2 0.0 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 0% 1 0.0
Weighted Average 94%
76
Table 10: Question 9 Analysis
Senior Managers
Middle Managers
Super visors
Maintainers/ Operators ∑ Agreement%
5-Levels Rating Average
Strongly Agree 3 2 7 45 60% 5 3.0 Agree 0 4 5 26 37% 4 1.5 Unsure 0 0 0 2 2% 3 0.1
Disagree 0 0 0 1 1% 2 0.0 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 0% 1 0.0
Weighted Average 91%
Table 11: Question 10 Analysis
Senior Managers
Middle Managers
Super visors
Maintainers/ Operators ∑ Agreement%
5-Levels Rating Average
Strongly Agree 3 5 3 65 80% 5 4.0
Agree 0 1 9 9 20% 4 0.8 Unsure 0 0 0 0 0% 3 0.0 Disagree 0 0 0 0 0% 2 0.0 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 0% 1 0.0
Weighted Average 96%
Table 12: Question 11 Analysis
Senior
Managers Middle
Managers Super visors
Maintainers/ Operators ∑ Agreement%
5-Levels Rating Average
Strongly Agree 1 4 4 69 82% 5 4.1 Agree 2 2 8 5 18% 4 0.7 Unsure 0 0 0 0 0% 3 0.0
Disagree 0 0 0 0 0% 2 0.0 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 0% 1 0.0
Weighted Average 96% Table 13: Question 12 Analysis
Senior Managers
Middle Managers Supervisors
Maintainers/ Operators ∑ Agreement%
5-Level Rating Average
Strongly Agree 0 1 0
0 1% 5 0.1
Agree 3 5 2 3 14% 4 0.5
Unsure 0 0 0 0 0% 3 0.0
Disagree 0 0 7 63 74% 2 1.5 Strongly Disagree 0 0 3
8 12% 1 0.1
Weighted Average 44%
Table 14: Question 13 Analysis
Senior Managers
Middle Managers Supervisors
Maintainers/ Operators ∑ Agreement%
5-Level Rating Average
Strongly Agree 0 0 1 0 1% 5 0.1 Agree 1 2 4 5 13% 4 0.5 Unsure 0 0 0 50 53% 3 1.6 Disagree 2 3 7 8 21% 2 0.4 Strongly Disagree 0 1 0 11 13% 1 0.1
Weighted Average 54%
77
Table 15: Question 14 Analysis
Senior
Managers Middle
Managers Supervisors Maintainers/ Operators ∑ Agreement%
5-Level Rating
Average Strongly Agree 3 2 10 62 81% 5 4.1 Agree 0 4 1 5 11% 4 0.4 Unsure 0 0 0 0 0% 3 0.0
Disagree 0 0 1 7 8% 2 0.2 Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0 0% 1 0.0
Weighted Average 93%
Table 16: Question 15 Analysis
Senior Managers
Middle Managers Supervisors
Maintainers/ Operators
∑ Agreement%
5 Level Rating Average
Strongly Agree 2 5 8 62 81% 5 4.1 Agree 1 1 4 9 16% 4 0.6 Unsure 0 0 0 0 0% 3 0.0
Disagree 0 0 0 3 3% 2 0.1 Strongly
Disagree 0 0 0 0 0% 1 0.0 Weighted Average 95%
78
APPENDIX B: EXPERIENCE ANALYSIS Q4: The locomotives maintenance processes and procedures are clear and understood by the
maintenance team.
Q5: Transnet have an effective locomotive maintenance plan that outlines the nature of maintenance
to be conducted
Q6: There is an effective Inventory management system advising when to order and how much to
order
129
25
8
1
34
51
Strongly Agree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly Disagree
1 - 10 years 10 - 25 years ≥26 Years
11 10
0
23
9
2
33
7
0
Strongly Agree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly Disagree
1 - 10 years 10 - 25 years ≥26 Years
2
7 75
1
11
2
18
2
8
2 3
14 13
Strongly Agree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly Disagree
1 - 10 years 10 - 25 years ≥26 Years
79
Q7: There is effective quality evaluation procedure that is applied ensuring that the delivered material
is of acceptable quality standard and specification
Q8: Locomotives failure rates are known and there is effective reliability measuring factors in place
Q9: There is effective system/technology that is used to conduct Condition Based Maintenance to
uplift the reliability level of locomotives
4
15
2
9
23
2
22
15
3
Strongly Agree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly Agree
1 - 10 years 10 - 25 years ≥26 Years
4 4
13
1
5 4
24
0
912 13
6
Fully Agree Agree Unsure Disagree Fully Agree
1 - 10 years 10 - 25 years ≥26 Years
5
15
1
23
11
29
9
2
Strongly Agree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly Disagree
1 - 10 years 10 - 25 years ≥26 Years
80
Q10: The training offered to the locomotives maintainers and operators is effective
Q11: Adequate training equipment is in place to conduct required practical training.
Q12: There is enough personnel required who are fully trained and certified to conduct locomotives
maintenance and operations at any provided time.
17
4
28
6
31
9
Strongly Agree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly Disagree
1 - 10 years 10 - 25 years ≥26 Years
18
3
29
5
31
9
Strongly Agree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly Disagree
1 - 10 years 10 - 25 years ≥26 Years
1
6 7 7
03
30
10
4
33
3
Strongly Agree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly Disagree
1 - 10 years 10 - 25 years ≥26 Years
81
Q13: There is effective forecasting model in place that is used to determine the future required
personnel capacity, supporting future maintenance and operations
Q14: The maintenance plant floor is visibly demarcated with labelled of tools and material.
Q15: The lighting and temperature in the workshop are favourable
1
5
10
5
0
4
20
5 5
0
3
20
10
7
Strongly Agree Agree Unsure Disagree Strongly Disagree
1 - 10 years 10 - 25 years ≥26 Years
7 95
32
0 2
38
1 1
Fully Agree Agree Unsure Disagree Fully Agree
1 - 10 years 10 - 25 years ≥26 Years
19
2
33
1
25
12
3
Fully Agree Agree Unsure Disagree Fully Agree
1 - 10 years 10 - 25 years ≥26 Years
82
APPENDIX C: QUESTIONNAIRE
Integrated Logistics Support Questionnaires: Locomotive Life-cycle Support
Bio data Purpose of the
question/statement 1. What is your working
experience? a) 1 – 10 Years b) 11 – 25 Years c) 26 and above Years
This question aims to determine the experience of the respondent. This will enable the researcher to segment the outcome of the survey in terms of experience differences provided
2. What is your age? a) 20- 30 Years b) 30 -40 Years c) 40 and above Years
This question aim to determine the age of the respondent. This information will assist the researcher to categorise the responses based on the age and experience.
3. What is your designation?
a) Senior Management b) Middle Management c) Maintainer/Operator/Lower Level
Management
This question aims to determine the position that the respondent occupied. This information will enable the researcher to categorise the outcome of the survey in terms of the disciples and designations.
Maintenance Strategy and Plan 5
Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Unsure
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
Purpose of the question/statement
4. The locomotives maintenance processes and procedures are clear and understood by the maintenance team.
This statement aim to evaluate if the existing maintenance processes and procedures are understood by the employees
5. Transnet have effective locomotive maintenance plan that outlines the nature of maintenance to be conducted
The purpose of this statement is to evaluate the effectiveness of the maintenance plan, it will answer the question of is the maintenance plan comprehensive enough to keep the locomotives reliable through maintenance?
Inventory Management 5
Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Unsure
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
Purpose of the question/statement
6. There is an effective Inventory management system that advises when to order and how much to order
The purpose of this statement is to evaluate the effectiveness of the inventory management system, does it serve the purpose?
83
7. There is a comprehensive quality evaluation procedure that is applied ensuring that the delivered material is of acceptable quality standard.
The purpose of this statement is to determine if there is an effective quality management process that is followed to assess if the incoming material meet the acceptable standards.
Locomotives Reliability 5
Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Unsure
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
Purpose of the question/statement
8. The Locomotives failure rates are known
The purpose of this statement is to determine whether the locomotives failure rates are known and if there is an effective response plan to the failures.
9. There is effective system/technology that is used to conduct Condition Based Maintenance to uplift the reliability level of locomotives
The purpose of this statement is to determine if there is any existing system/ technology that is used to conduct the condition monitoring activities on the locomotives.
Training and Training Devices 5
Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Unsure
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
Purpose of the question/statement
10. The training offered to the locomotives maintainers and operators is effective
The purpose of this statement is to assess the quality of training that is offered to the labourers, it also aim to answer the question of can the maintainers able to maintain and the operators able to operate?
11. Adequate training equipment is in place to conduct required practical training.
The purpose of this statement is to determine the availability and effectiveness of the practical training devices/ equipment
Labour and Personnel 5
Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Unsure
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
Purpose of the question/statement
12. There is enough personnel required who are fully trained and certified to conduct locomotives maintenance and operations at any given time.
The purpose of this statement is to determine whether the current personnel are adequate to conduct the required locomotives maintenance requirements.
13. There is effective forecasting model in place that is used to determine the future required personnel
The purpose of this statement is to investigate if there is an impending recruitment plan to address forecasted maintenance activities
84
capacity supporting future maintenance and operations
Maintenance Facilities Requirements 5
Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Unsure
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
Purpose of the question/statement
14. The maintenance plant floor is visibly demarcated with labelled of tools and materials
The purpose of this statement is to assess if the plant floor demarcations are visible and understood by the employees
15. The lighting and temperature in the maintenance area is acceptable.
The purpose of this statement is to evaluate the condition of the maintenance area to the employees who are working there.