Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System...

43
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall ESSENTIALS OF SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN FOURTH EDITION Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1

Transcript of Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System...

Page 1: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

ESSENTIALS OFSYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGNFOURTH EDITION

Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements:

Process Modeling

6.16.1

Page 2: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Learning ObjectivesExplain process modelingDiscuss data-flow diagramming

mechanics, definitions, and rules Discuss balancing data-flow

diagramsDiscuss the use of data-flow

diagrams as analysis tools Examine decision tables used to

represent process logic

6.26.2

Page 3: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Process Modeling Graphically represents the processes that

capture, manipulate, store, and distribute data between a system and its environment and among system components

Data-flow Diagrams (DFD): The most popular method of Process Modeling Graphically illustrate movement of data between

external entities and the processes and data stores within a system.

Movement of data BUSINESS PROCESS. Your job is to make systems efficient by understand data flows.

6.36.3

Page 4: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Process Modeling (continued)

Modeling a System’s Process Utilize information gathered during

requirements determination. Find inefficiencies in current system Re-engineer current system

Structure of the data is also modeled in addition to the processes

Deliverables and Outcomes Set of coherent, interrelated data-flow

diagrams6.46.4

Page 5: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Process Modeling (continued)

Deliverables and Outcomes (continued) Context data-flow diagram (DFD)

Scope of system

DFDs of current system Enable analysts to understand current

system

DFDs of new logical system Technology independent Show data flows, structure and functional

requirements of new system6.56.5

Page 6: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6.66.6

Process

InterfaceSource/

Sink

data store

Page 7: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Data-Flow Diagramming Mechanics Data Flow

data in motion

marks movement of data through the system - a pipeline to carry data

connects the processes, external entities and data stores

Unidirectional

originate OR end at a process (or both)

name as specifically as possible - reflect the composition of the data - a noun

do not show control flow! Control flow is easy to identify- a signal with only one byte - (on/off).

HINT: if you can't name it: either it's control flow, doesn't exist or you need to get more information!6.76.7

Page 8: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Data-Flow Diagramming Mechanics (continued)

Data Store Depicts data at rest

represents holding areas for collection of data, processes add or retrieve data from these stores

May represent data in: File folder, Computer-based file, Notebook

Label includes name of the store as well as the number only processes are connected to data stores name using a noun (do not use ‘file’)

show net flow of data between data store and process. For instance, when access a DBMS, show only the result flow, not the request

6.86.8

data store

Page 9: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Data-Flow Diagramming Mechanics (continued)

Process Depicts work or actions performed on data so

that they are transformed, stored, or distributed

Drawn as a rectangle with rounded corners Number of process as well as name are

recorded name with a strong VERB/OBJECT combination;

examples:create_exception_report validate_input_characters calculate_discount6.96.9

Process

Page 10: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Data-Flow Diagramming Mechanics (continued)

Source/Sink Depicts the origin and/or destination of the data Sometimes referred to as an external entity

Any class of people, an organization, or another system which exists outside the system you are studying.

Form the boundaries of the system

Drawn as a square symbol Name states what the external agent is NOUN Because they are external, many characteristics

are not of interest to us6.106.10

InterfaceSource/

Sink

Page 11: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6.116.11

Two Source/ Sink Cannot Communicate without a process

Page 12: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Data-Flow Diagramming Definitions

Context Diagram A data-flow diagram of the scope of an

organizational system that shows the system boundaries, external entities that interact with the system and the major information flows between the entities and the system

Level-O Diagram A data-flow diagram that represents a

system’s major processes, data flows, and data stores at a higher level

FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS CLASS WE WILLMAINLY CONSIDER TILL THIS LEVEL6.126.12

Page 13: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Developing DFDs: An Example

Hoosier Burger’s Automated Food Ordering System

Context Diagram (Figure 6-4) contains no data stores

6.136.13

Page 14: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6.146.14

The System uses one process (Food Ordering System), four data flows and three sources and sinks

Page 15: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Developing DFDs: An Example (continued)

Next step is to expand the context diagram to show the breakdown of processes (Figure 6-5)

Food ordering System has 4 sub-processes Receive and Transform Order Update goods sold file (for materials

ordering) Update inventory file Create Management Reports

Page 16: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6.166.16

Page 17: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Data-Flow Diagramming Rules Basic rules that apply to all DFDs:

Inputs to a process are always different than outputs . THUS INPUTS OUTPUTS

Objects always have a unique name In order to keep the diagram uncluttered,

you can repeat data stores and data flows on a diagram

You don’t want the DFD looking like a Spaghetti.

6.176.17

Page 18: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

DFD Rules -- Process

A. No process can have only outputs (Miracle)

B. No process can have only inputs (Black hole)

C. (1) Use Verb phrase labelEvery Process has Input & Output

Page 19: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

DFD Rules -- Process

A.

B.

Incorrect Correct

Miracle

Black Hole

Page 20: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

DFD Rules -- Data StoreD. Data cannot move directly from one

data store to another data store . You NEED A PROCESS.

E. Data cannot move directly from an outside source to a data store. AGAIN YOU NEED

A PROCESS F. Data cannot move directly to an outside

sink from a data store. AGAIN YOU NEED A PROCESS

One end of a Data Flow must be a Process

G. Use a Noun phrase label (Entity Name)

Page 21: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

DFD Rules -- Source / SinkH. Data cannot move directly from

a source to a sink. It must be moved by a process.

I. Noun phrase label. (External)

Page 22: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

DFD Rules -- Data FlowJ. A data flow has only one direction

of flow between symbols; a data flow may flow in both directions to and from a data store (usually two symbols)

K. A fork in a data flow means that exactly the same data goes to two different processes or data stores.

L. A join in a data flow means that exactly the same data comes from two different processes and data stores.

Page 23: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

DFD Rules -- Data FlowIncorrect Correct

J.

K.

L.

Page 24: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

DFD Rules -- Data Flow

M. A data flow cannot go directly back to the same process it leaves

N. A data flow to a data store means create, update or delete

O. A data flow from a data store means retrieve or use

P. Use a Noun phrase label. Contents are attributes of entities and data items

Page 25: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Decomposition of DFDs

Functional Decomposition Act of going from one single system to many

component processes Repetitive procedure Lowest level is called a primitive DFD

Level-n Diagrams A DFD that is the result of n nested

decompositions of a series of sub-processes from a process on a level-0 diagram

6.256.25

Page 26: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Balancing DFDs When decomposing a DFD, you must

conserve inputs to and outputs from a process at the next level of decomposition

This is called balancing

The number of inputs and Outputs must be balanced across levels.

6.266.26

Page 27: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Balancing DFDsAn Unbalanced Example

In context diagram, we have one input to the system, A and one output, B

Level-0 diagram has one additional data flow, C

These DFDs are not balanced

6.276.27

Draw a Border around the System. Check for the number of entries and exists to and from the systems. THEYSHOULD MATCH ACROSS LEVELS

Page 28: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Balancing DFDs

We can split a data flow into separate data flows on a lower level diagram

6.286.28

Page 29: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Guidelines for Drawing DFDs1. Completeness

DFD must include all components necessary for system

Each component must be fully described in the project dictionary or CASE repository

2. Consistency The extent to which information

contained on one level of a set of nested DFDs is also included on other levels

Balancing is a part of this. 6.296.29

Page 30: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Guidelines for Drawing DFDs (continued)

3. Timing Time is not represented well on DFDs

Best to draw DFDs as if the system has never started and will never stop

4. Iterative Development Analyst should expect to redraw diagram

several times before reaching the closest approximation to the system being modeled

REMEMBER it is an APPROXIMATION6.306.30

Page 31: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Guidelines for Drawing DFDs (continued)

5. Primitive DFDs Lowest logical level of decomposition Decision has to be made when to stop

decomposition When do you stop decomposing?

When each task is a singular task that can be programmed .

6.316.31

Page 32: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Guidelines for Drawing DFDs (continued)

Rules for stopping decomposition: When each process has been reduced to

a single decision, calculation or database operation

When each data store represents data about a single entity

When the system user does not care to see any more detail

6.326.32

Page 33: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Guidelines for Drawing DFDs (continued) Rules for stopping decomposition:

(continued) When every data flow does not need to be

split further to show that data are handled in various ways

When you believe that you have shown each business form or transaction, online display and report as a single data flow

When you believe that there is a separate process for each choice on all lowest-level menu options

6.336.33

Page 34: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Using DFDs as Analysis Tools Gap Analysis

The process of discovering discrepancies between two or more sets of data-flow diagrams or discrepancies within a single DFD

Inefficiencies in a system can often be identified through DFDs

6.346.34

Page 35: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Using DFDs in Business Process Reengineering

Example: IBM Credit Credit approval process

is required six days before Business Process Reengineering (see Fig 6-12)

6.356.35

After Business Reprocess Engineering, IBM was able to process 100 times the number of transactions in the same amount of time

Page 36: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Logic Modeling

Data-flow diagrams do not show the logic inside the processes.

They also don’t show the sequence of activities

Logic modeling involves representing internal structure and functionality of processes depicted on a DFD

Utilizes Decision Tables

6.366.36

Page 37: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Modeling Logic with Decision Tables A matrix representation of the logic

of a decision Specifies the possible conditions and

the resulting actions Best used for complicated decision

logic

6.376.37

Page 38: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Modeling Logic withDecision Tables (continued) Consists of three parts:

Condition stubs Lists condition relevant to decision

Action stubs Actions that result for a given set of

conditions Rules

Specify which actions are to be followed for a given set of conditions

6.386.38

Page 39: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Modeling Logic withDecision Tables (continued) Indifferent Condition

Condition whose value does not affect which action is taken for two or more rules

Standard procedure for creating decision tables: Name the conditions and values each

condition can assume Name all possible actions that can occur List all possible rules Define the actions for each rule (See Figure

6-16) Simplify the decision table (See Figure 6-17)

6.396.39

Page 40: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6.406.40

Condition Stubs

Action Stubs

Page 41: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6.416.41

Page 42: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

DECISION TREES

A graphical representation of a decision situation in which decision points (nodes) are connected together by arcs (one for each alternative decision) and terminate in ovals (the action which is the result of all the decisions made on the path that leads to that oval).

Page 43: Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Structuring System Requirements: Process Modeling 6.1.

Sun Up?

Go back

to Slee

p

What Day?

Wake up

Sleep 1

more Hour

Sleep 2

more Hour

s

NoYes

SundayWeek Day

Saturday