CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA. Kowal 20053 CAUSE Subtle neurological developmental problem Nearly always in...

download CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA. Kowal 20053 CAUSE Subtle neurological developmental problem Nearly always in isolation.

If you can't read please download the document

description

CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA CET ONSET < 3 MONTHS: RARE USUAL ONSET 3+ MONTHS

Transcript of CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA. Kowal 20053 CAUSE Subtle neurological developmental problem Nearly always in...

CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal CAUSE Subtle neurological developmental problem Nearly always in isolation CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA CET ONSET < 3 MONTHS: RARE USUAL ONSET 3+ MONTHS CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal CORE DEFECTS NOT ET! Sensory: N-T asymmetry Motor: N-T asymmetry, LMLN [T&H] poor devpt of binocularity CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA CET Large angle ET N- T asymmetry Amblyopia ?30% Cross fixation : LE used for right gaze, RE for L gaze CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA CET Usual range of refraction 25% caucasian neonates > +4 ? Higher + more prone to CET CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal RACIAL Caucasians: poor binocularity + hyperopia : cong ET is commonmest type of cong strab No good comparative population studies CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal ASSOCIATIONS Downs Severe neonatal course IVH /HC PVL CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal IS IT CONGENITAL : SMOOTH PURSUIT ASYMMETRY All neonates develop N-T asymmetry, sensory and motor Age 6-8 mo: asymmetry lost in normals Persists CET a/w reduced potential for sensory & motor fusion CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal Motion detection: normal infants & CET infants Bosworth & Birch.Vision Res Asymmetry in detection of horizontal motion in normals and CET Motion detection thresholds measured in 75 normals and 36 eyes of 27 infants with CET FPL with random-dot patterns. CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal Motion detection: normal infants Asymmetries in sensitivity for nasalward (N) vs. temporalward (T) directions of motion were compared in normals & CETs, age 1 mo to 5 y. NORMALS : N = T under 2.5 mo N > T motion preference between 3.5 and 6.5 mo. N advantage gradually diminished to T = N by 8 mo = adults. CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal Motion detection: normal infants & CET infants No asymmetry in 15 normal infants who performed the task binocularly, hence, the asymmetry was not a L - R bias. In the youngest CET patients tested [5 mo], a nasalward superiority in motion detection was observed and was equivalent to that of same- age normal infants. CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal Motion detection: normal infants and infants with CET Unlike normals, this asymmetry persists in older CET patients and is close to the root cause / association of CET CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal VERTICALS IN CET > 2 types: 1. DVD: Non fixing eye drifts up 2. Oblique dysfunction Usu IO OA Can be SO OA CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal VERTICALS IN CET : DVD CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal VERTICALS IN CET : DVD Common pattern: Right fixation: L L fixation: R End result of braking the torsional component of LMLN in the fixing eye to try and improve acuity CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA CET Head turns / face tilts CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal INFANTILE ET COCHRANE Cochrane Database Syst Rev ? most effective type of intervention ? age at intervention SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing any surgical or non- surgical intervention for infantile esotropia CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal INFANTILE ET COCHRANE NO adequate studies were found CONCLUSIONS:..literature on interventions for IE are either retrospective studies or prospective cohort studies...not been possible to resolve controversies regarding type of surgery, non-surgical intervention and age of intervention need for good quality trials to be conducted to improve the evidence base CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal The clinical spectrum of early-onset esotropia: If it looks like CET: is it CET? CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal The clinical spectrum of early-onset esotropia: Congenital Esotropia Observational Study.PEDIG. Am J Ophthal RESULTS: 175 infants. 3 1 mo. 55% constant, 25% variable, 20% intermittent 50% 40 Most larger angle ET constant Most smaller angle ET intermittent or variable. CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal CET Observational Study - PEDIG #1 Most first seen > 12 w constant ET (65%) Most seen I saw today a 15 week old baby with typical cong ET. >Confident exam findings >Little / no amblyopia. >Accurate measurement of misalignment of 45^. >Cyclo +4-2x180 OU > >My normal practice would be to tentatively book BMR 2-4 weeks hence and >see child again pre-op to confirm measurements > >This is however the youngest child I have seen with cong ET >Previously operated a 21 week child many years ago - ended up with >random dot stereo > >Any tips / thoughts about operating in 2-3 weeks at age weeks? CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal Case 1 - Alan Scott 1 Glasses trial for 2 weeks with over correction, say, +4, ou. Forget the astigmatism, it changes all the time at this age. Yes it could be accommodative and I have seen glasses work at this age. You may well need them later in any case. 2 Botox 3 units to each MR. This has a 60-80% chance of correction under age 6 mo. An office procedure under local as with adults. 3 BMR recession if the Botox doesnt hold. CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal Consec XT - Ciancia > Thank you for your interest in my results in operated Infantile Esotropia. >The percent of secondary XT was as follows: >Immediate 1% >At 6 months 2,3% >At 1 year 3,5% >At 2 years 5,4% >At 3 years 10% >At 4 years 8,2% >At 5 years 10% (roughly) >At 10 years 20% " >At 15 to 27 years 30% " CONGENITAL ESOTROPIA Kowal