Configuration Management AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

15
August 24, 2022 1 Cleveland 2005 CMBG 2005 Configuration Management AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

description

Configuration Management AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee. CMBG Mission. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Configuration Management AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

Page 1: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 1Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

Configuration Management AP-929, Revision 1

Mike StoutChairman

CMBG Steering Committee

Page 2: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 2Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

CMBG Mission

“To provide a forum for the exchange of information which is useful to practitioners of nuclear facility configuration management and to act as the CM Community of Practice for the nuclear industry.

Page 3: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 3Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

Community of Practice

– A Community of Practice (CoP) is an industry peer group of experts in a process or sub-process defined in NEI’s Standard Nuclear Performance Model. The group serves as the owner of that particular process or sub-process, managing the solution of issues for the industry in that area. NEI assesses CoP development based on six attributes: formation of a leadership team, a charter, cost definitions, process descriptions, definitions of performance indicators and performance improvement projects.

Page 4: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 4Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

Industry CM Issues

• Margin Management

• Fuel Performance

• Performance Indicators

• New NRC Engineering Inspections

• IT cost/benefit

• Process Orientation

• Eastern European plants and risk

Page 5: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 5Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

Current Initiatives

• Planning for 2006 CMBG conference (June) in Richmond hosted by Dominion Energy.

• Integrate CM/IM/IT Processes and resolve interface conflicts.

• Complete revision to INPO AP-929 using CM Process model that agrees with NEI Standard Nuclear Performance Model

• Pilot program to make CM performance indicators “workable and visible”

Page 6: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 6Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

AP-929 Team

• Gary Bal- INPO• Mike Stout- Spescom Software, Inc.• Keith Reinsmith- PPL Susquehanna• Rick Harris- Duke• John Parler- VC Summer• Bob Hess- Diablo Canyon• Larry Kidd- Dominion Energy• Tom Czerniewski- Indian Point

Page 7: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 7Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

Project Motivation

• CMBG 2001 Participants wanted focus on ANSI/NIRMA CM 1.0-2000 concepts and terminology

• ANSI standard addresses “Objectives” and program elements

• Worked with NEI on SNPM

• Now working with INPO on AP-929

Page 8: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 8Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

Design andLicense

Requirements

Design Information

OperationalConfiguration Info

Physical Configuration

Operating,Maintenance, Training

& ProcurementInformation

MustConform

MustConform

MustConform

Facility ConfigurationInformation

What is required tobe there

What is there What we say is thereElements conform or deviations are identified.Conformane deviations ae tracked to closure.All changes are authorizedConformance is auditable.

Work processes must ensure that:

The CM Objectives

Page 9: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 9Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

CM Process Model• High level model

• integrated processes used to return to CM ‘objective’ when change occurs.

• developed in early 2002 by CMBG task force.• influenced content of industry guidance

documents:• NEI Standard Nuclear Performance Model • INPO Operation Excellence Outcomes

enablers• used by CMBG to develop CM Performance

Indicators• AP-929 further details this model

11

Page 10: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 10Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

CM Process Model

* CM sub-processes agree with NEI Standard Nuclear Performance Model

EvaluateIdentified

Problem orDesiredChange

ChangeFacility

ConfigurationInformation

?

ChangeDesign

Requirements?

ChangePhysical

Configuration?

DoNothing More

CM Equilibrium

Physical Configuration

ChangeAuthorization

Process

DesignRequirements

Change ProcessFacility

ConfigurationInformation

Change Process

No No

Yes Yes Yes

No

CM001*

CM002 * CM003 *

CM004 *

Page 11: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 11Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS1. FOREWORD

2. TABLE OF CONTENTS

3. FEEDBACK AND COMMENTS

4. PROCESS INTEGRATION

5. DEFINITIONS

6. CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES

7. CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROCESS FLOWCHART

8. CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY DEFINITION

9. APPENDICES

Page 12: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 12Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

DEFINITIONS• As-built• As-designed• As-found• Authorization Basis Information• Design Authority• Design Bases• Design Information• Design Input• Design Output• Design Requirement

Page 13: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 13Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

DEFINITIONS (continued)

• Facility Configuration Information

• Graded Approach

• Non-conformance

• Operational Configuration

• Operational Configuration Information

• Physical Configuration

• Structure, System, or Component

Page 14: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 14Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

APPENDICES

• A Flowcharting Conventions

• B Design Basis

• C Well Managed Margins

• D Plant Modification Process Example

• E Performance Indicators

• F References

Page 15: Configuration Management  AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee

April 19, 2023 15Cleveland 2005

CMBG2005

AP-929 revision status

• Team met at INPO in late August 2004• Model and outline completed• Added a level of detail to model• Mod example moved to Appendix• Review by team complete.• INPO review cycle, editorial changes.• Will be on INPO website for comment• Will notify all in CMBG database• Expect issue by 3rd Qtr 2005.