Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

24
Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf

Transcript of Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Page 1: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Conference Abstracts

APLNG RoundtableSeptember 28, 2012

Bob Schrauf

Page 2: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Conference Timelines

The “Idea”

9-10 months

Abstract Deadline

8 months

Conference

Presentation

Write the Talk

2 months

Practice the Talk with A Group

1 month

Follow-up with

Interested People

1-2 weeks

Before…. ….After

Page 3: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

The Abstract: For Whom Are You Writing?

1. Yourself2. The Selection Committee3. The Conference Goer4. Publication (?)

Page 4: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Typical Guidelines

• American Association of Applied Linguisticshttp://www.aaal.org/

• TESOLhttp://www.tesol.org/convention2013/education-schedule/graduate-forum

Page 5: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Submission Components

1. Paper title2. Abstract – 250-300 words3. Summary (program abstract) -

50 words4. Keywords

Page 6: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Abstract Components

1. Title2. Background3. Problem4. Aims5. Methods/Analysis6. Significance

Page 7: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Examples

• Buckholtz, M. Standard English as Subversion (AAA 1998)

• Keating, E. Embodied Practices of Honorification (AAA 1998)

• Anon. “Okay, when did it start?” (AAAL, maybe)

• Schrauf, R.W. Ethnicity, Alzheimer’s, and Indexicality. (AAAL, maybe)

Page 8: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Course Papers

APLNG RoundtableSeptember 28, 2012

Bob Schrauf

Page 9: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Course Papers / Lit Reviews:

Amount, sources, recency• How much reading should you do? i.e., how

many papers are enough for a good quality lit review?

• What kinds of sources can I use for my lit review?

• What kinds of research should I be focusing on? i.e., should I focus only on foundational studies, or should I focus on more recent work, or both?

Page 10: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

SOURCES– Seminal sources: these are fundamental

publications (books or articles) usually mentioned by your professor or in your texts.

– Recent sources: these are books or articles published within the last 10 years.

Search Engines:• LLBA – Linguistics and

Language Behavior Abstracts• Web of Science• ERIC

LIBRARY > DATABASES

http://www.libraries.psu.edu/psul/databases.html#e-content

Page 11: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Literature Review Papers“A lit review is a tutorial in that the author

• Defines and clarifies a problem

• Summarizes previous investigations in order to inform the reader of the state of current research

• Identifies relations, contradictions, gaps, inconsistencies in the literature; and

• Suggests the next step or steps in solving the problem” (Eisenberg, 2000, p. 18)

Page 12: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Summarizing, Quoting, Paraphrasing

• How much information can/should I take from these primary sources and how I can I use it in my paper? i.e. issues of citation/paraphrasing and plagiarism

• How much should I synthesize the information? for example, is it okay to have a separate page on each of the sources?

Page 13: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Q: How much information can/should I take from these primary sources and how I can I use it in my paper?

A: As much as is necessary (groan)

Think about these questions:• For whom am I writing?• What in my sentences is my own

and what belongs to the authors to whom I’m referring?

Page 14: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Storytellers almost inevitably describe their characters’ actions in terms of preferred or dispreferred values. However, as Ochs (2001) notes, “…. moral stance becomes destabilized when it is directly or indirectly challenged by another co-teller” (Ochs, 2001, p. 51).

“In addition to self-doubt, moral stance becomes destabilized when it is directly or indirectly challenged by another co-teller” (Ochs, 2001, p. 51).

Storytellers almost inevitably describe their characters’ actions in terms of preferred or dispreferred values. Nevertheless, narrators may find that interlocutors challenge or contest their ‘moral stance’ (Ochs, 2001, p. 51)

The Original Source

My Citation of That Source

My Paraphrase of That Source, with

Cited Phrase

Storytellers almost inevitably describe their characters’ actions in terms of preferred or dispreferred values. Nevertheless, narrators may find that interlocutors challenge or contest their views (see Ochs, 2001).

My Incorporation of the General Idea

Page 15: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Q: is it okay to have a separate page on each of the sources?A: Well, no.

• Am I summarizing one person’s thoughts?• Am I integrating thoughts from several persons?• How much information from each source do I need

to make my summary meaningful to my audience?• Or how much information do I need to support the

argument that I am developing?• If you read the paper to your roomate, will he or she

have enough information to understand your point• Or have you given so much unnecessary information

that your roomate is confused?

Page 16: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

Q: How much criticism should there be in a lit review? i.e. do I simply retell what's been done or should I evaluate it and relate it to other important issues in my field?

A: Evaluate it, comment on it, relate it to your other reading, relate it to your experience.

Hint: Your professor probably already knows this material. You want to show that you have read it, and you want to show that the material relates in interesting ways to other things that you’ve read.

Page 17: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

The MA/TESL (‘Thesis’) Paper

APLNG RoundtableSeptember 28, 2012

Bob Schrauf

Page 18: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

The MA/TESL (Thesis) Paper

• What makes a good MA paper? • How long should it be?• What is the typical genre -- literature review,

original empirical study, etc.?• About how much literature should be read or

cited in order to develop a quality paper (or does that "just depend")?

• Any tips on choosing topics?

Page 19: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

The MA/TESL (Thesis) Paper

Q: What makes a good MA paper?

A: Thoughtful writing, clear organization, reader-friendly language, interesting project.

Page 20: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

The MA/TESL (Thesis) Paper

Q: What is the typical genre -- literature review, original empirical study, etc.?A: Some examples include:– empirical research involving data collection and

analysis; – empirical research involving analysis of secondary

data; – development of curriculum; – literature reviews of particular topics, and – development of assessment instruments.

Page 21: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

The MA/TESL (Thesis) Paper

Q: How long should it be?A: 25-30 pages

Page 22: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

The MA/TESL (Thesis) Paper

Q: About how much literature should be read or cited in order to develop a quality paper (or does that "just depend")?

A: You should include seminal works and recent works. For example, if you were doing linguistic relativity, you would certainly cite Whorf’s work from the 1950’s, but you would also cite work as recent as 2011.

Page 23: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

The MA/TESL (Thesis) Paper

Q: Any tips on choosing topics?

A: Talk to your advisor.

Page 24: Conference Abstracts APLNG Roundtable September 28, 2012 Bob Schrauf.

MA Paper Timeline

End of 2 nd semester, choose topic

and advisor

6 weeks before graduation: complete

draft to advisor

Graduation

4 weeks before end of semester:

complete draft to com

mittee

1 week beofore end of semester: Final

copy and signature page to comm

ittee

Third semester, start project

and writing