CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT...

Project : Affordable housing EWS LIG project (Expansion) Conceptual Plan &

Environmental Management Plan Developer : Anukampa Homes Pvt Ltd

EIA Coordinator Authorized Signatory

CONCEPTUAL PLAN &

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

INTRODUCTION & PROJECT SUMMARY:

The proposed project involves vertical expansion of EWS LIG affordable housing project coming

up at village Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj). The project is developed by

Anukampa Homes Pvt. Ltd.

The total plot area o f the project is 11,981.07 sq. m. Gross built up area envisaged for the project

is 31,219.95 sq. m. (Existing: 19,140.54 sq. m, Proposed: 12,079.41 sq.m) (> 20,000 sq. m.). Thus, the

project requires prior Environmental Clearance under Item 8 (a) {Building & Construction

projects} of Schedule- EIA Notification 2006 and subsequent amendments thereafter from the

State Level Environmental Impact Assessment Authority, Rajasthan.

The proposed project will constitute of 12 blocks comprising of 705 EWS & LIG units (existing-

441 and proposed-264).

Table: Salient features of the project

Items Details

Project address Khasra No. 1407, 1408, 1413, 1414, P. No. B, Village Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer,

Jaipur (Raj)

Type of project Affordable Housing EWS LIG Project (Expansion)

Screening

category

The project is categorized under 'B-2' under item 8(a) of Schedule – Gazette

Notification dated Sep 14th, 2006 and subsequent amendments there off.

Total Plot area 11,981.07 sq. m

Gross Built up

area

31,219.95 sq. m.

(Existing: 19,140.54 sq. m, Proposed: 12,079.41 Sq.m)

Ground coverage 3531.15 sq. m. (29.52%)

Green Area 1224.58 sq. m. (10.22%)

Dwelling units 705 nos. dwelling units

Flat type Existing Proposed Total units

LIG 234 144 378

EWS 207 120 327

Total 441 264 705




Maximum height

& number of

floors

Type No. of Floors Height (in m.)

Existing Proposed Total Up to Terrace

Level

Up to Mumty/

Machine room

LIG Block A-F 4 3 7 23.70 --

EWS Block A-E 4 3 7 -- 14.84m

EWS Block F 3 - 3 12.10m --

Parking facilities Required Parking : 705 scooters (existing 441 + proposed 264)

Proposed Parking : 729

Power

requirement &

source

Connected load : 3312 KW

Max. demand : 1711 KW

Source : JVVNL

Power backup DG sets of capacity 200 kVA (1 no.)

Water

requirement &

source

Water demand Fresh Recycled Total

Existing 146 88 234

Proposed 88 29 117

Total 234 117 351

Source: Fresh water: PHED Supply

Sewage treatment

& disposal

Sewage treatment facility : STP of 300 KLD capacity

Sewage discharge : 100 KLD (supplied to farmers)

IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT PROPONENTS:

Anukampa homes Pvt Ltd, the real estate giant in Rajasthan with special strength, exuberates

quality and excellence with over 35 year of expertise and experience. It has created some of the

most pioneering episodes of real estate promotion and residential town planning. From a very

modest beginning to the accomplishment of numerous projects in varied sectors, the group has left

an indelible mark in the real estate industry and technology. Anukampa Group has created a niche

for themselves by adopting quality system standards that match the best in the world. Their

magnificent apartments have emerged as the most sought after destination for luxurious living

amidst stimulating environment.

Legal information:

Name of the company : Anukampa Homes Pvt. Ltd.

Director : Prashant Gupta

Registered address : Anukampa Homes Pvt. Ltd.

401, Anukampa Mansion-II, M.I. Road, Jaipur (Raj)




REGULATORY COMPLIANCE:

The project is coming up on a land duly converted for group housing purposes. Patta issued on

dated 14.08.2007 for plot area of 23,333.77 sq. yards (19,501.69 sq. m.) in favour of M/s Deep

Valley Infra Developers {Annexure I (a)}.

The land was purchased by Anukampa Homes Pvt. Ltd. on dated 03.10.2008 {Annexure I (b)}

Later, the land was later sub-divided into two parcels admeasuring 9004.53 sq. yards (7520.62

sq. m.) (Plot no. A) & 14329.24 sq. yards (11,981.07 sq. m.) (Plot no. B) vide JDA letter no.

/ / -11/ / 13/ - 4007 dated 09.09.2013 {Annexure I (c)}

The proposed EWS & LIG housing project is coming up at Plot no. B admeasuring 11,981.07

sq. m.

Building plans for Phase I Having built up area of 19,140.54 sq. m (<20,000 sq. m.) were

approved by JDA vide letter dated 16.04.2015 (Annexure VI).

NOC from Airport Authority of India has been obtained vide letter no. AAI/RHQ/ NR/ ATM/

NOC/ 2015/61/1296-99 dated 03.03.2015 (Annexure V).

Application for obtaining assurance of water supply from PHED has been submitted.

LOCATION OF THE PROJECT & INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES:

The proposed project is located at Khasra No. 1407, 1408, 1413, 1414, P. No. B, Village Muhana

Tehsil Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

Details of other infrastructural facilities (aerial distance):

Nearest Railway Station : Sanganer RS (20 km NE)

: Jaipur RS (13.59 Km NNE)

Nearest Airport : Jaipur Airport (7.86 Km ENE




PROJECT DETAILS:

The project will constitute of 12 blocks EWS and LIG (Block A-F) with 705 nos. of dwelling units

(EWS: 327 nos., LIG: 378 nos. The details are tabulated as under:

EWS LIG Grand

Total Existing Proposed Total Existing Proposed Total

Dwelling units 207 120 327 234 144 378 705

No. of blocks 6 Nil 6 6 Nil 6 12

No. of floors

Block A-E G+4 3 G+7 G+4 3 G+7

Block F G+3 Nil G+3 G+4 3 G+7




Block wise details:

Existing

Block Type No of Blocks No of units in each Block Total no of units

1. LIG Block A-F 6 39 234

2. EWS Block A-D 4 39 156

3. EWS Block E 1 39 39

4. EWS Block F 1 12 12

Total (A) 441

Proposed

Block Type No of Blocks No of units in each Block Total No of units

1. LIG Block A-F 6 24 144

2. EWS Block A-D 4 24 96

3. EWS Block E 1 24 24

4. EWS Block F No change No change No change

Total (B) 264

Grand Total (A) + (B) 705

PARKING REQUIREMENT:

Basis of calculations: 1 two wheeler / unit

a. Existing:

No. of units : 441

Total two wheeler parking required : 441 ……… (A)

b. Proposed:

No. of units : 264

Total two wheeler parking required : 264 ……… (B)

c. Total parking required: (A) + (B) : 705 two wheeler parking

d. Total parking provided : 729 two wheeler parking




POWER REQUIREMENT:

Power requirement for the proposed project is given as under:

S. No. Description

1. Source of supply JVVNL

2. Electrical Load Connected load : 3312 KW

Max. demand : 1711 KW

3. Transformer Number 1 no.

Capacity 2000 kVA, 33/0.433 kV

4. DG Sets Number 1

Capacity 200 kVA

Fuel Used HSD (sulphur content: 0.05%)

Fuel Consumption 40 ltr/hr

Electrical Demand Break Up:

S.

No.

No.

of

units

Light

load/ unit

(KW)

Power

load/ unit

(KW)

Connected

load (KW)

DF Demand

load

(KW)

Light

load

Power

load

Apartment

1. 1 BHK (EWS) 327 1.50 2.00 1144.5 0.70 0.40 605

2. 1 BHK (LIG) 378 2.00 3.00 1890 0.70 0.40 983

A. Total (1-2) 705 3034.5 1588

1. Parking, lobby,

staircase lighting

1 58 0.00 58 0.80 -- 46.4

4. Lifts 13 0.00 5.50 71.50 -- 0.55 39.3

5. Boring Pumps 2 0.00 10.00 20.00 -- 0.65 13.00

6. Plumbing Pumps 1 0.00 15.00 15.00 -- 0.80 12.00

7. Fire Fighting 13 0.00 7.50 97.50 -- 0.00 0.00

8. STP 1 0.00 15.00 15.00 -- 0.80 12.00

B. Total (1-9) 277 122.7 say

123

Grand Total

(A+B)

3311.5 say

3312

1711

Selection of transformers:




Total load requirement : 1711 KW

Applying a power factor of 0.9 : 1901 kVA

Hence, 1 nos. 2000 kVA, 33/0.433 kV transformer will be provided

Selection of DG Sets:

Total essential load requirement (after diversity) : 123 kW

Applying a power factor of 0.9 : 137 kW

Considering 80% loading of the rated DG capacity

Minimum rating of DG set required : 171.25 kW

Hence, 1 nos. 200 kVA DG set will be provided.

There will be complete power backup through DG sets of capacity of 200 kVA used in case of

power cut or failure. DG set will be provided with an effective safe stack height of 24 m for proper

dispersion of pollutants to contain the emissions within the permissible limits. The fuel requirement

will be about 40 l/hr of HSD (as and when used).

CRITERIA OF WATER DEMAND:

The daily water requirement will be 351 KLD (fresh water: 234 KLD + recycled/reused water

demand: 117 KLD).

Criteria of water demand are given as under:

Particulars Population Fresh water Treated water total

Residential 3525 @65 LPCD: 229 KLD @21 LPCD: 74 KLD 303 KLD

Existing 2205 143 KLD 46 KLD 189 KLD

Proposed 1320 86 KLD 28 KLD 114 KLD

Visitors 530 @9 LPCD: 5 KLD @6 LPCD: 3 KLD 8 KLD

Existing 330 3 KLD 2 KLD 5 KLD

Proposed 200 2 KLD 1 KLD 3 KLD

Landscaping &

general washing

- -- 30 KLD 30 KLD

234 KLD 132 KLD 278KLD




WATER BALANCE (TOTAL)

Fresh water

234 KLD

Residential

229 KLD

STP treated

water

117 KLD

Visitors

5 KLD

Landscaping & General

washing 40 KLD

255 KLD

Waste water

S

T

P

Capacity

300 KLD

Sludge &

evaporation

losses

38 KLD

Drain/ Supplied

to farmers

100 KLD

Recycled/ reused

183

3

69

Daily water demand: 351 KLD

{234KLD (fresh) + 117 KLD (recycled/ reused water)}

Flushing

77 KLD

Source: Fresh Water: PHED Water Supply/ bore wells

Treated Waste water: STP Treated Water

LIGHT & ELECTRICITY DETAILS:

RECOMMENDED LUX LEVELS:

The recommended values of illumination (in Lux) as per the National Building Code of India

(2005) are as under:

S. No. Space Illumination Level (Lux)

i. Entrance 150-200-300

ii. Lifts 50-100-150

iii. Corridor, passageways, stairs 50-100-150

iv. Covered car par

Floor

Ramp and Corner

Entrance and exits

5-20

30

50-100-150

v. Outdoor car park 5 – 20




IDENTIFICATION, PREDICTION AND EVALUATION OF IMPACTS:

Environmental impact can be defined as any alteration of environmental conditions, adverse or

beneficial, caused or induced by the action or set of actions under consideration.

Various operations involved in the project have been studied in details to identify, predict and

evaluate impacts on various environmental components. The identified impacts were quantified

using mathematical models to a possible extent so as to estimate the future environmental scenario.

AIR ENVIRONMENT:

Air pollution has long been recognized as a brain storming issue worldwide. The onset of

technological and scientific innovations in various fields and diverse activities of human race for

its elegance have put extra load on the atmosphere by way of releasing air pollutants like

particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5), sulphur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOX), carbon

monoxide (CO), unburned hydrocarbon (HC) and other organic as well as inorganic pollutants

including trace metals responsible for causing health consequences. Entry of pollutants into the

atmosphere occurs in the form of gases or particles. Continuous mixing, transformation and trans-

boundary transportation of air pollutants make air quality of a locality unpredictable. The growth

of population, industry and number of vehicles and make the problem of air pollution still worse.

Rapid industrialization and vehicular traffic especially in the urban areas of India is a great threat

to air quality.

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA:

Details of monitoring report are given as under:

Ambient air monitoring report

Instrument used: Respirable Dust Sampler (SLE-RDS 103 & SLE-GA 133) & Fine Particle Sampler APM 550)

Sampling date-02.10.2015, Duration: 24 hrs.

Parameter Observation Permissible (maximum) protocol

In µg/m3

PM10 (µg/m3) 76.5 100 IS 5182(Part 23):2006

PM2.5 (µg/m3) 45.2 60 As per CPCB Guidelines

SO2 (µg/m3) 8.7 80 IS 5182 (Part 2):2001

NOx (µg/m3) 17.6 80 IS 5182 (Part VI):2006

CO (mg/m3) 370 2000 IS 5182 (Part 10)1999

* Monitoring reports enclosed as Annexure IV.




Instrument Sensitivity:

Instrument Range and Sensitivity

Respirable Dust Sampler

(RDS)

(PM-10)

0.40 – 1.5 m3/min

±0.02 m3/min

(Other gases)

0 – 3 LPM

± 0.2 LPM

Fine Particulate Sampler (PM – 2.5) : ±0.03 DGM m3

CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

SOURCES OF POLLUTION:

1. Vehicular Exhaust:

The major source of pollution in construction phase will be vehicles carrying construction

material. Pollution load from the same is calculated as:

Pollution Load = No. of trucks × Emission Factors × Deterioration Factor

Due to movement of average 05 trucks short term pollution load is given in table:

Parameter Emission Factor

(g /km)*

Deterioration Factor

(g /km)*

Pollution Load

(g/km)

CO 4.5 1.33 29.92

NOx 1.21 1 6.05

SPM 0.8 1.595 6.38

SO2 0.15 1 0.75

HC 1.21 1 6.05

* Source : CPCB Publication, 1998

2. Emissions from Construction equipments:

The fugitive dust emission sources are:

Excavation

Haul road movements

Construction

Material Handling

Finishing




Emissions factors for construction equipment are given in table below:

Equipment Emissions Factors (g/hr)

CO VOC NOX SOX PM10

Excavator 214.09 43.99 516.18 3.31 27.21

Backhoe/ Front end loader 190.05 56.69 370.13 1.58 37.64

Rubber tired crane 161.02 39.00 464.02 2.67 23.58

Hydraulic Crane 161.02 39.00 464.02 2.67 23.58

Concrete Vibrator 72.57 13.60 122.46 0 4.53

Paving Equipment 186.42 48.53 412.31 1.95 29.93

Roller/ Compactor 165.10 34.92 316.15 1.90 23.13

*Source: SCAQMD CEQA Hanbook

MITIGATION MEASURES:

S. No. Guidance on Practices to reduce emission

1. Water Application Water will be applied by variety of methods, for instance trucks, hoses,

sprinklers, etc to mitigate dust generation from the construction site.

2. Dust Suppressants Dust suppressants which are more effective than water, will be applied

judiciously.

3. Design Travelled distances will be minimized for delivery of materials

Green building materials viz. fly ash bricks, RMC’s, etc. will be used

to the best possible extent.

4. Storage Piles Storage pile activity will be conducted downwind

Enclosures/ coverings will be used for storage piles

Properly shape storage piles will be considered.

5. Vehicles &

Equipments

Engines & exhaust systems will be properly maintained.

Low sulphur diesel (HSD) will be used.

Idling time will be eliminated/ reduced to the maximum

Evaporative losses will be minimized

6. Material Handling

& Transfer

systems

Mud and dirt track-out and carryout will be controlled properly.

Material drop will be minimized at the transfer point and enclosure

Foam suppression systems will be utilized.

Loads on haul trucks will be secured.

PM emissions from spills will be prevented.

Material handling operations will be minimized.

7. Road Surfaces On-site vehicle restrictions will be established.

Unpaved roads will be properly maintained.




POST CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

The emission sources are mainly due to the diesel generator set of capacity 200 kVA and increase

in number of vehicles.

SOURCES OF POLLUTION:

A. DG sets:

Calculation of stack height of D.G. sets

i. DG Set of capacity 200 kVA:

The stack height of DG set is calculated as under:

H = 0.2 (√capacity of the DG set in kVA)

= 0.2 x (√200)

= 0.2 x 14.14 = 2.82 m

However, a safe stack height of 24 m above the roof of DG house will be provided.

B. Vehicular emissions:

There will be increase of 729 scooters due to the proposed project.

MANAGEMENT PLAN

SOURCES MANAGEMENT

• Exhaust from D.G. sets

of capacity 200 kVA

• DG set conforming to the CPCB standards will be deployed.

• D.G. set will be provided with effective stack height of 24 m above the

roof of DG set.

• Low-sulphur-content fuel (HSD - Sulphur content 0.05%) will be used.

• Emission due to

vehicular exhausts

especially congestions

during peak traffic

hours.

• Sufficient width of driveways to ensure smooth traffic movements.

• Provisions of fully internalized parking including the parking facilities

for the visitors.

• Guided traffic ways within the project site.

• Speed humps will be installed for speed restrictions inside the project

area.




WATER ENVIRONMENT:

GROUND WATER ANALYSIS REPORT*

Date of sampling: 02.10.2015

S.

No.

Parameters Value Found Standards as per IS 10500:2012

Desirable

limits

Permissible

Limits in absence

of alternate

source

Test Methods

1. pH 7.15 6.5-8.5 NR IS : 3025(Part 11):2002

2. Color, Hazen Unit <1 <5 <15 IS:3025 (Part 5):1983

3. Odour Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable IS:3025 (part 5)2002

4. Turbidity (NTU) <1 NTU 01NTU 05NTU IS:3025(Part 10)2002

5. Total Dissolve

Solids

5977.0 mg/l <500 mg/l 2000 mg/l IS:3025(Part 16)2006

6. Total hardness as

Ca CO3

72.0 mg/l <200 mg/l 600 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 21):2009

7. Calcium (Ca) 14.40 mg/l <75 mg/l 200 mg/l IS:3025 (part 40)2003

8. Magnesium (as

Mg)

8.75 mg/l <30 mg/l 100 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 40)2003

9. Total Alkalinity (as

CaCO3)

324.0 mg/l <200 mg/l 600 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 23)2003

10. Nitrate (as NO3) 13.28 mg/l <45 mg/l NR IS:3025 (Part 34)2003

11. Chloride (as Cl) 63.98 mg/l <250 mg/l 1000 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 32)2003

12. Sulphate (as SO4) 47.83 mg/l <200 mg/l 400 mg/l IS:3025(Part 24)2003

13. Iron (as Fe) 0.04 mg/l <0.3 mg/l NR IS:3025(Part 53)2003

14. Fluoride (as F) 1.25 mg/l <1.0 mg/l <1.5 mg/l IS:3025(part 60)2008

15. Free Residual

chloride)

<0.1 mg/l <10.2 mg/l 1.0 mg/l IS:3025 (part 26)1986

*Monitoring report enclosed as Annexure IV.

CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

WATER CONSERVATION TECHNIQUES:

Best construction practices will be adopted to reduce the water demand for construction activities:

Use of curing water: Spraying of curing water and after liberal curing, all concrete structures

will be covered with gunny bags, followed by spraying of water.

Use of polymer dispersion and air entraining agents to reduce the construction water demand.




Admixtures will be used to reduce water demand during construction.

Discouraging the washing of vehicles and equipment on the construction site. Workers will

not allow to wash their personal vehicles on site. Vehicles and equipment that regularly leave

the construction site should be washed offsite.

MANAGEMENT PLAN:

SOURCES MANAGEMENT

Generation of sewerage Temporary septic tank followed by soak-pit will be provided.

Un-captured run-off

from the site may

contaminate ground

water aquifers.

The rain-water entering into the pit will be screened for the removal of

heavy silt and other materials.

Provisions will be made to ensure the construction vehicles stick to the

access track to prevent mud & dirt being deposited on roads.

Fence will be constructed around the site to trap sediments whilst

allowing the water to flow through.

Up slope water will be diverted with turf and due care will be taken not

to mix mortar in locations that will drain into storm water system.

Unsanitary conditions

during rainy season.

The civil contractor will be made responsible for site sanitation and will

be bound by the management to adhere to healthy level of sanitation.

There will be no stagnant water at site, as the runoff from the relevant

areas will be systematically drained into the storm water line. There

will be provision of cleaning the storm water line periodically.


The daily water demand for the project will be 351 KLD. Daily fresh water demand will be 234

KLD (85,410 cu. m./annum). The fresh water demand will be met from PHED water supply.

A. WATER CONSERVATION TECHNIQUES:

Following water conservation techniques have been proposed for the project:

Dual plumbing system will be adopted to utilize the treated waste water for flushing

(77KLD), landscaping and general washing (40 KLD). This will help in reducing the

fresh water demand by 33%.

Dual flushing fixtures will be used to allow different volumes of water for solid and

liquid flushing which will help in conserving the water demand for flushing significantly.




Landscape design & management of irrigation systems:

o Native & xeriscaping plant species: Choose native plant species that need less

water.

o Creating Hydrozones: Grouping of plant according to their water needs to provide

adequate water to all plants without over or under-watering.

o Maintain Healthy Soil: Healthy soils are the basis for a water-smart landscape; they

effectively cycle nutrients, minimize runoff, retain water, and absorb excess nutrients,

sediments, and pollutants.

o Mulching: Incorporate mulch around shrubs and garden plants to help reduce

evaporation, inhibit weed growth, moderate soil temperature, and prevent erosion.

Adding organic matter and aerating soil can improve its ability to hold water.

o Avoid watering during the heat of the day. Water early in the morning to reduce the

evaporation rate

o Drought tolerant species will be selected.

o Turfs will be avoided to the extent possible.

o Central shut off valve will be provided

o Sprinkler landscaping system will be used to conserve water

B. WASTE WATER GENERATION & TREATMENT

Approximate 255 KLD waste water will be generated which will be treated in STP based on

phytorid technology with capacity of 300 KLD. Physico chemical characteristics of influent

and effluent are given as:

Parameters Influent (mg/ltr) Treated effluent (mg/ltr)

BOD 200-1000 <20 mg/l

COD 500-2500 < 60 mg/l

pH 5-8 6-8

Nitrogen 10-40 1-2

Phosphorus 10-40 1-2

TSS 150-350 10-15




STORM WATER MANAGEMENT:

Construction Phase:

S. No. Contaminant Sources Impact Mitigation

1. Sediment &

Floatables

Streets, lawns, driveways,

roads, construction

activities,

During construction, sediment fencing or other

erosion control devices will be used to mitigate

the short-term adverse impacts of

sedimentation.

2. Oil & Grease Roads, driveways, parking

lots etc.

Oil & Grease trap will be provided to remove

oil & grease, suspended matter, and ensure the

quality of water.

Storm water control and rain water harvesting will be done as per the standards laid down by

CGWA & BIS. Following measure will be adopted for the same:

Construction Sequencing: Construction sequencing (involves disturbing only part of a site at a

time to prevent erosion from dormant parts) has been done at site. Grading activities and

construction are completed and soils are effectively stabilized on one part of the site before grading

and construction commence at another part.

Compost Blankets: A compost blanket is a layer of loosely applied composted material placed on

the soil in disturbed areas to reduce storm water runoff and erosion. This material fills in small rills

and voids to limit channelized flow, provides a more permeable surface to facilitate storm water

infiltration, and promotes re-vegetation.

Post Construction Phase:

a. Design:

For good design of rainwater harvesting, following points are to be kept under consideration:

Ideal location with good ground slope.

The location has adequate subsurface permeability of the aquifer to accommodate maximum

recharge of rainwater through injection well.

Rate of filtration should exceed average rainfall intensity.

Clogging of filtration media should be cleaned periodically.




Ground water pollution does not take place.

b. Baseline:

The average annual rainfall (based on last 10 years rainfall data) is 597mm.

Rain Fall Data (last 10 years):

S. No. Year Annual Average Rainfall No. of Rainy Days

1 2014 606 40

2 2013 757 35

3 2012 907 28

4 2011 646 38

5 2010 750 40

6 2009 377 28

7 2008 572 32

8 2007 553 34

9 2006 407 27

10 2005 392 19

Total 5967 321

Average 597 32

Source: Water Resource Department, Rajasthan

Rainfall data recorded at Sanganer rain gauge station.

c. Calculation of No. of RWH Structures:

The rain water harvesting structures are calculated on the basis of peak intensity of rainfall

recorded as 60 mm/hr considering 15 minutes of peak rainfall. The same has been done to

avoid flooding of the area.

S.

No

Type of

Structure/ Surface

Area [A]

(sq. m.)

Run off

Coefficient

[C]

Intensity

of rainfall

(m/hour) [I]

Total discharge

[Q = CIA]

(m3/hr)

1. Roof Top 3531.15 0.9 0.06 190.7

2. Landscape 1224.58 0.3 0.06 22.0

3. Paved 7225.24 0.75 0.06 325.13

Grand Total (1-3) 11981.07 537.8 say 538




Total Rain Water Flow : 538 m3/hr

Considering 15 minutes of peak rainfall,

Runoff volume : 135 m3/hr

Volume of each pit : 27m3 (3 m x 3 m x 3.3 m)

Total no. of rain water harvesting pits required : Total run-off volume/volume of each pit

: 135/27 = 5 nos.

Therefore, 5 Nos. rain Water Harvesting pit of size 3 m length x 3 m width x 3 m depth with PVC

slotted pipe upto minimum depth of 30 m as following figure.

d. Design of Rain Water Harvesting Structure:

The dimensional parameters of Desilting/Settlement chamber would be 3 m (length) x 3 m

(width) x 1.30 (depth). In Desilting chamber, 0.30 m depth below outflow is kept for silt

deposition. The filtration tank dimension would be 3 m (length) x 3 m (width) x 1 m (depth)

with 0.15 m dia recharge well of 30 m depth depending upon the formation for recharge in

aquifer through vadose zone. Each structure will be capable of handling rainwater volume @

27 m3/day and such structures will accommodate up to total rainfall volume of 47.28 m3 in

any rainfall event at peak rainfall occurrence.




e. Calculation of annual recharge:

S.

No

Type of

Structure/ Surface

Area [A]

(sq. m.)

Run off

Coefficient

[C]

Intensity

of rainfall [I]

(m/annum)

Total discharge

[Q= CIA]

(m3/ annum)

1. Roof Top 3531.15 0.9 0.597 1897.2

2. Landscape 1224.58 0.3 0.597 219.3

3. Paved 7225.24 0.75 0.597 3235.1

Grand Total (1-3) 11981.07 5351.6 say 5350

Total Annual Recharge to Ground Water Regime of the area through rainwater harvesting structure

would be 5350 m3/ annum.

SOIL ENVIRONMENT: SOIL ANALYSIS

Location: Project Site ; Date of sampling: 02.10.2015

Parameters Results

Color Light Brown

pH (1:10) 8.30

Conductivity (1:10)( µS/cm) 226.0µS/cm

Moisture (%) 9.4 %

Chlorides as Cl (%) 0.006 %

Sulphate as SO4 0.003 %

Total Carbonates (%) 0.4 %

Total Organic Matter (%) 0.65 %

Nitrogen as N (%) 0.22 %

Phosphorous as P(%) 0.005 %

Potassium as K (%) 0.13 %

*Monitoring report is enclosed as Annexure IV.

WASTE MANAGEMENT:

CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

About 1873 MT (Existing: 1148 MT + Proposed: 725 MT) of the construction waste will be

generated. Details of the same is given as under:




S. No. Particulars Approx. Qty, (MT) Disposal

Existing Proposed

1. Wood 551 348 Sold to vendors

2. Dry Wall 230 145 Disposal site.

3. Concrete 103 65 Disposal site.

4. Metal Scrap 23 15 Sold to vendors

5. Cardboard 172 109 Sold to vendors

6. Plastics 23 15 Sold to vendors

7. Electronic Scrap 23 15 Disposal site.

8. Misc.(Paint, Ceramic etc) 23 15 Disposal site.


The solid waste generated from the project considering full occupancy will be mainly domestic

waste and estimated quantity of the same will be approx 1410 kg/day. The solid waste generated

will be first segregated as plastic, glass, paper, and other waste separately and disposed off as per

MSW Rules.

Waste Type Estimated Quantity

Compostable Waste 1128 kg/day

Plastic 152 kg/day

Paper waste 96 kg/day

Metal Cans 8 kg/day

Glassware 18 kg/day




Misc. 8 kg/day

Total 1410 kg/day

ENERGY CONSERVATION CALCULATIONS:

Total flat light load can be reduced by 40% by use of LED lamps in place of fluorescent/

incandescent lamps.

Total landscape and street light load will be met through solar powered fixtures.

Total geyser load can be reduced by 10% by using solar power.

Lift load can be reduced by 23% by use of VF drives.

All capacitors will be provided with Harmonic Filters to avoid distortion in Voltage.

Automatic Power Factor correction panel with capacitor will be used for Common Load &

Fixed Capacitor for Transformer to minimize the losses.

Emphasis will be given on low maintenance, low wattage and longer life in selection of chokes

and lamps for all common area and external light fixtures.

SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

STUDY AREA:

The study area of 1.0 km radius comprises of the habitation of Muhana and Madau villages. Social

infrastructure of schools, hospitals and recreational activities are available in the vicinity.

POPULATION

The total population of the study area is 8887, the males constitute of 52 per cent and females are

47.98 per cent. The 0-6 population constitute of 15.38 per cent. The sex ratio of the study area is

859 females over thousand males. The child sex ratio is 854 girls on thousand boys. In each

household approximately 4 to 6 persons live together.

TABLE: POPULATION OF THE STUDY AREA

VILLAGE

NAME MALE FEMALE

MALE

(0-6)

FEMALE

(0-6) HOUSEHOLD

Mandau 760 710 129 123 250

Muhana 3863 3554 598 517 1107

Total 4623 4264 727 640 1357

8887

*Sources: CENSUS OF INDIA 2011




LITERACY

The literate population of the study area is 5512 which constitute to be 62.02 per cent. The male

literacy with respect to male population is 59 per cent and female literacy totals 40.98 per cent with

respect to female population in the study area

TABLE : LITERACY STATUS OF THE STUDY AREA

VILLAGE NAME MALE FEMALE

Mandau 527 385

Muhana 2726 187

Total 5512

*Sources: Census of India, 2011

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

The total working population of the study area is 3573 accounting to be 40.20 per cent. From the

total working population the main workers constitute of 83.87 per cent and marginal working

population is 16.12 per cent. The female working population is 31.5 per cent with respect to female

population of the study area. The majority of the main population in the study area is engaged in

agriculture and related activities. In the study area people are also occupied in other works like

government services, private jobs, manufacturing, retailing etc.

TABLE:EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF THE STUDY AREA

VILLAGE

NAME

MAIN WORKING

POPULATION

MARGINAL WORKING

POPULATION

NON-WORKING

POPULATION

MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE

Mandau 312 224 39 39 409 447

Muhana 1709 752 166 332 1988 2470

Grand total 2997 576 5314

Total Working

Population

3573 5314

*Sources: Census of India, 2011

SOCIO ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The proposed project showcases the EWS LIG affordable housing development in the study area.

The proposed project will fulfill the housing requirements of urban masses. It will also help in

generating revenue for state government and development authorities.




The proposed project will create direct employment opportunities to at least 200 people during the

construction phase. The project is targeted for the economic weaker section and low income group

people, the project will cater to the good quality affordable housing demands of the city. Increased

income security will contribute to the empowerment of the most vulnerable sections of the society

TABLE : IMPACT IDENTIFY IN THE PROJECT AREA

IMPACT DEGREE OF IMPACT DESCRIPTION

Employment

Generation Positive & Long Term

Direct Employment: At the construction phase 200

employees will be given employment.

Indirect Employment: The housing project will bring indirect

employment in the study area as there will be increase in

grocery shops, departmental store, vendors, iron shops etc.

Increase in

Local

Amenities

Long Term

The local amenities in the study area will increase. It is a sign

of development in the study area such as new water

connections, electricity connections, phones etc.

Cultural Mix Long Term Influx of people is expected which will bring cultural mix.

Increase in

Government

revenues &

taxes

Positive & Long Term Increase in local amenities will lead to increment in revenues

& taxes by government.

Permanent

Housing to

increase

Quality of life

Positive & long Term

The occupants will be able to save as their will be housing

security. Children will be able to get steady education.

Higher level of satisfaction.

Construction

Phase Negative & Short Term

The construction phase might create negative impacts around

the site area such as litter, noise, influx of people from

outside

EXPENDITURE ON ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES:

S. No. Particulars Capital Cost

(in lacs)

Annual recurring

cost (in lacs)

1. Acoustic enclosures & stack attached to DG sets 1 0.1

2 STP 25 2

3 Rain water harvesting 7.5 --

4 Solid waste management 5 1

5 Pollution monitoring 0.5 0.5

6 Fire fighting & emergency handling 35 1

7 Green Belt 5 1




TOTAL

**********

CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT...

Documents

Transcript of CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT...