COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF INTEGRATED COGNITION AND EMOTION Bob MarinierUniversity of Michigan.
-
Upload
audra-owen -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF INTEGRATED COGNITION AND EMOTION Bob MarinierUniversity of Michigan.
COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF INTEGRATED COGNITION AND EMOTION
Bob Marinier University of Michigan
Introduction
Existing research in cognitive science tends to ignore emotion research
Existing research in emotion tends to ignore cognitive science
Goal is to develop a computational theory of the control of immediate behavior in which emotion has a clear functional role
Claim: Cognitive and emotion theories are actually very complementary
2
Newell’s Abstract Functional Operations(NAFO) for immediate behaviorPerceive Obtain raw perception
Encode Create domain-independent representation
Attend Choose stimulus to process
Comprehend
Generate structures that relate stimulus to tasks and can be used to inform behavior
Task Perform task maintenance
Intend Choose an action, create prediction
Decode Decompose action into motor commands
Motor Execute motor commands
3
NAFO is incomplete
Perceive What information is generated?
Encode What information is generated?
Attend What information is required?
Comprehend
What information is required and generated?
Task What information is required?
Intend What information is required?
4
Appraisal theories
Idea: Humans evaluate a situation with respect to their goals along a number of innate dimensions E.g., Novelty, Goal Relevance, Causality,
Conduciveness Appraisals trigger emotional responses
Mapping between appraisal values and emotions is fixed
Problem: Existing process models of appraisal are weak
5
Appraisals to emotions6
Integration of cognition and emotion
7
NAFO: process without data Appraisal theories: Data without process Claim: Appraisals are the data generated
and used by NAFO
Integration of NAFO and appraisal
8
Extended theory
Implemented in Soar, a cognitive architecture Provides independently-motivated
constraints Allows for integration with other cognitive
mechanisms
9
Integration with Soar10
Long-Term Memories
Body
Episodic
Perception Action
Procedural Semantic
Short-Term Memory
De
cisi
on
P
roce
du
reA
pp
raisa
l D
ete
ctor
Soar 9
Chunking EpisodicLearning
ReinforcementLearning
SemanticLearning
Extended theory
Distinction between emotion, mood, and feeling Emotion: Result of appraisals
Is about the current situation Mood: “Average” of recent emotions
Provides historical context Feeling: Emotion “+” Mood
What agent actually perceives
11
Cognition
Emotion
Mood
Feeling
Com
bina
tio
n Fu
nction
Pull
Decay
Active Appraisa
ls
Perceived Feeling
Emotion, mood, and feeling12
Extended theory: Learning
Feeling should drive reinforcement learning Feelings give an indication of how well things are
going well Use feeling intensity and valence as intrinsic
reward signal What is being learned?
Choices related to NAFO What to Attend to When to Intend (vs. Ignore) What to Intend When to create which subtasks, and when to return to
supertask
13
Learning task14
Start
Goal
Optimal Subtasks
Results: With and without mood
15
Results: With and without mood
16
Future work17
Near future Explore learning further Explore new capabilities
Giving up Interruptability
Richer domain Continuous time, space
Eventually Multiple agents: social interaction Physiology Interaction between other cognitive mechanisms
and emotion