Complaint and Discovery Requests

33
 I L H  BYRD CUY HOG COU TY  CUERK  O F  COURTS 1200  Ontario  Street  Cleveland,  Ohio  44113  ur t  of  m m n  Pleas  e w  Case  Electronically Filed:  December  21,2015  10:51 By:  SU ODH  HANDRA  0069233  onfirmation  Nbr.  624362 SIMPSON  HUGGINS  vs T H E  METROHEALTH  SYSTEM  V  15  856035 Judge: MI HAEL  ASTRAB Pages  Filed:  32 Electronically  Filed  12/21/2015  10:51 /  /  V  15  856035  /  onfirmation  Nbr.  624362  /  LMKO

Transcript of Complaint and Discovery Requests

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 1/33

  IL H   BYRD

CUY HOG

COU TY CUERK OF  COURTS

1200 Ontario Street 

Cleveland, Ohio 44113

  urt of   mm n  Pleas

 ew  Case Electronically  

Filed:

 

December  21,2015 10:51

By: SU ODH  HANDRA 0069233 

onfirmation Nbr. 

624362

SIMPSON

 HUGGINS

 

vs

THE  METROHEALTH SYSTEM

 V 15

 856035

Judge:

MI HAEL  

ASTRAB

Pages Filed: 

32

Electronically 

Filed 12/21/2015

 

10:51 /

 

/

 

V

 15 

856035 /  onfirmation Nbr.

 

624362 /

  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 2/33

IN

 

THE 

OURT OF  MM N  LEAS 

UYAHOGA 

OUNTY,

 OH

Simps n 

Huggins

 

III

4849 

D n van

 Street

 leveland, OH

 

44125,  ase N .

Plaintiff,

Judge

vs.

The

 

Metr Health

 System

2500

 

Metr Health

 

Drive

 leveland, 

OH

 44109,

Defendant.

  plaint

 with

 Jury 

D

e and

 ature of  actio

1.  

This

 is 

an

 

action

 to 

rec ver

 for retaliation 

under

 

Ohi

’s 

Whistlebl wer

 

Statute,

 R. .

 

4113.52. Plaintiff Simps n Huggins III 

was

 retaliated against for 

rep rting

 

crimes he 

disc vered

 

while

 

perf rming his 

duties 

as

 Direct r 

of

 Internal

 

Audit

 

for

 The

 

Metr Health

 

System.

 After

 rep rting 

these

 

crimes to the

 

Audit

 

mmittee  of the B ard of Trustees

 

including

 

theft of B t x

 injections

 and  ther

 

services

 

fr m

 

Metr Health

s

 

Pepper

 

Pike

 

Dermat l gy

 

linic

 

for

 

use

 

by

 

senior

 

executives 

and  

irregularities 

with

 

EO Akram

 

B utr s

travel 

expenses

 

and   ther 

reimbursements Mr.  Huggins  

was

 placed  n unpaid 

administrative

 leave in  

retaliation for l king at  rec rds he “had  n business l king at” and  “ verstepping 

his  b unds” as an empl yee (to qu te Metr Health General  unsel Michael D.

Page

 1

 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 3/33

Phillips).

 

Rather  than

 address the

 issues Mr.

 

Huggins

 

raised,

 

Metr Health  ch se to 

c me

 after

 Mr. Huggins. 

Such

 

actions 

violate

 

Ohi law.

Parties

2.  Plaintiff Simps n Huggins III is the Direct r of Internal Audit 

for

 

The

 

Metr Health System. He  resides in  uyah ga   unty.

3.  Defendant  Metr Health System  is a c unty hospital located in  uyah ga  

unty.

 

Metr Health

 empl yees are 

public

 empl yees paid by

 

the 

c unty

 and

 

subject

 

to

 

Ohi

ethics

 

laws.

Jurisdiction

 

and venue

4. 

The  

urt  

has

 jurisdiction because 

the 

suit c ncerns state-law  violations

 

and  

the 

am unt  in 

c ntr versy

 

exceeds $25,000.

5.  The   urt  has pers nal

 

jurisdiction  ver The Metr Health System.

6.

 

Venue

 

is

 

pr per

 

here

 

because

 

the

 

parties

 

are

 

located

 

in

 

this

 

c unty

 

and

 

the

 

events at

 

issue t k

 

place here.

Facts

Simpson Huggins becomes Director of   nternal  udit.

7.   Metr Health hired Mr.

 Huggins 

n appr ximately 

June 

25,

 

2012 

as  

an 

audit

 

manager.

8.  In  appr ximately March  or  April 

of 

2013,

 the 

Direct r of Internal Audit 

resigned. Metr Health put  Mr. Huggins  in that position  n an  interim basis.

9.  appr ximately July 22, 2013,

 

Metr Health 

made

 Mr. Huggins  the full 

time

 Direct r of Internal

 

Audit.

Page 2

 of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 4/33

10. 

The

 Direct r of

 

Internal Audit is resp nsible for a variety 

of

 

duties 

including 

perf rming an annual  financial internal-reporting  control

 

audit.

 The

 internal-audit 

department 

c nducts 

these 

preliminary

 tests

 

as

 

part of

 

preparing 

for

 

the

 state 

auditors to c me  in and c nduct their review. Within  each 

control

 testing there are 

10-20 individual steps that add up to that control. Part 

of

 the analysis involves 

reviewing acc unts payable for  justification as  to why  expenses are being 

reimbursed.

11. 

An ther

 

aspect

 

of

 

the

 

Director

 

of

 

Internal

 

Audit

s

 

duties

 is 

to

 

rep rt

 

to 

Metr Health’s

 Audit

 

mmittee

 

at

 

quarterly meetings.

 Mr.

 

Huggins has

 been 

rep rting at these

 

quarterly meeting

 

since July 

2013.

12.  Mr.

 

Huggins

 

reports

  n

 an

 

administrative 

basis

 to

 

hief 

Financial 

Officer

 raig Richm nd.

 

Mr. Huggins  reports functionally to 

the

 B ard of

 

Trustees.

Mr

uggins

 

uncovers

 

felony

 

theft

 

crimes

 

including

 

receipt

 

of

 

free

 

Botox

 

injections

 and 

other 

services

 by  

certain

 senior Metro ealth

 

employees 

and  

use of  public funds to pay

 

for

 

lavish 

personal travel

 for

 

the

 

CEO

13. 

As  part 

of

 

c nducting his

 

internal audit,

 Mr.  Huggins unc vered 

variety

 of 

impr per activity and

 

practices that

 

constitute felony

 theft.

14.  One  of 

the 

subjects

 

of Mr.

 

Huggins

audit

 was possible fraud and theft at the 

Metr Health Pepper Pike Dermat l gy  linic. His  audit revealed that tw vice 

presidents

 

and  at least 

ne

 empl yee

s relative accepted free B t x injections 

and

 

ther services at the Metr Health Pepper 

Pike

 Dermat l gy  linic.1

1 Mr. 

Huggins

 

kn ws

 

the

 

names

 

of the

 individuals wh

accepted

 these 

free 

services. And the  

d cumentati n

 

supp rting his audit (which, as described below, Metr Health confiscated)

 

includes 

their 

names

 

as 

well.

 Mr.

 

Huggins 

is

 

n t

 

identifying them

 

in

 

this

 pleading due to 

medical-privacy

 concerns.

Page 3 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 5/33

15. 

Metr Health

 

empl yees

 administered the 

free

 treatments. 

These

 

empl yees

 

failed 

to

 c mply with pr per pr cedures

 

regarding 

rec rding

 

lot

 

numbers 

and  

expiration

 dates 

for 

the

 B t x 

that

 was

 

administered.

16.  The  cust mary charge 

for

 or 

value

 of a single B t x treatment at the 

Metr Health Pepper 

Pike

 Dermat l gy  linic is at least $729.

17.  Theft of  pr perty or 

services

 valued at m re than $1,000 is a felony.

18.

 

B t x is 

a

 danger us

 

drug

 under

 Ohi

law.

19. 

Theft

 

of

 

a

 

danger us

 

drug

 

is 

a

 

felony.

20.   Mr.

 

Huggins

’s audit

 also 

revealed

 impr per 

expenses

 including 

evidently

 

pers nal

 (non-business) travel 

expenses

 paid

  n  behalf

 

of  hief 

Executive 

Officer 

Akram  B utr s

 

and  his

 

wife 

including

 trips

 to 

L nd n,

  w

 

Y rk, 

Venice,

 

and  

Abu

 

Dhabi.

 

These expenditures

 

exceeded

 

$1000 each.

21.

 

Mr.

 

Huggins

s

 

audit

 

further

 

revealed

 

impr per

 

pr cedures

 

regarding

 

c rp rate

 credit-card

 usage

 

and  failure

 to enforce

 

the written

 

policies regarding

 

submissi n of  receipts to

 justify

 and d cument expenses.

22.

 

Audit reports typically include  ne  of the following ratings:

 

mmendable,

 

Satisfactory, 

Needs 

Impr vement,

 Needs

 

Significant 

Impr vement,

 

or  

Unsatisfactory.

23.   hief

 Financial 

Officer  raig Richm nd 

instructed

 

Mr. Huggins n t

 to

 

sh w  

any rep rt ratings in his  

presentati n

 to the Audit  mmittee.

24.   Mr.  Richm nd 

also

 instructed Mr.

 Huggins

 to 

withh ld

 any Executive 

Summaries  

for

 audit 

reports

 and n t to 

present 

the 

findings

 in Open  

F rum.

Page 4 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 6/33

25.   Mr.  Richm nd  

further

 

instructed

 Mr.

 

Huggins

 

to 

present

 

the 

observations, 

findings,

 

and  rec mmendati ns  nly in

 Executive 

Session.

Mr. 

uggins  

blows

 the

 whistle

 on  criminal

 activity

26.   December 15, 2015, Mr. Huggins delivered a presentati n to the Audit 

mmittee in which  he detailed a variety 

of

 concerns. Param unt  in his  rep rt 

was

 

his disc very regarding the B t x theft at the 

Pepper

 Pike Dermat l gy  linic. He  

also 

c vered

 impr per

 

payment  of 

pers nal

 travel 

expenses

 

for

 Dr. B utr s.

27.

 

During

 

the

 

Audit

 

mmittee

 

meeting

 

n

 

December

 

15,

 

2015,

 

Audit r

 

Bryan

 

Licht,

 

at 

Mr.

 Huggins

s

 direction,

 sent a 

c py

 

of 

the 

written

 audit rep rt 

regarding

 

the 

B t x and impr per B utr s

 

expenditures

 

to

 

raig Richm nd  ( hief

 

Financial 

Officer),

 

Dan  Lewis

 ( hief

 

Operating 

Officer),

 

Alfred

 

nners

 ( hief

 Quality 

Officer), Abel T rres (Executive Direct r and  hairman for Dermat l gy), and  

Brendan

 

Patters n

 

( linical

 

Service

 

Line

 

Leader

 

for

 

Dermat l gy).

28.

  Mr.

 Huggins  exercised due diligence and  reas nable care 

in

 investigating

 

the

 

violations he raised 

in

 his  presentati n at the Audit 

mmittee

 meeting and in his

 

written audit 

report.

The  retaliation

 

begins 

while 

Mr. 

uggins

 

is

 

in the 

midst

 of 

reporting

 

his

findings 

to

 the 

udit  

Committee.

29.

 

During

 

Mr.

 

Huggins

s

 

rep rt

 

to

 

the

 

Audit

 

mmittee,

 

Metr Health

 

General

 

unsel 

Michael 

D.

 

Phillips

 left

 

the

 meeting

 r m.  

M ments

 

later,

 Mr. 

Huggins

’s

 

email and 

system-netw rk

 access 

was

 

terminated.

30.

  Mr.

 

Huggins  typically participates in 

the

 Finance

 

mmittee  meeting that 

follows the Audit

 

mmittee  meeting.

Page 5 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 7/33

31.

  At  Audit  mmittee

 meeting ’s c nclusi n

  n December 15,

 2015,

 Mr.

Huggins

 

was

 preparing

 

to

 participate 

in

 

the 

Finance  mmittee 

meeting

 

when

 

hief

 Financial 

Officer

 

raig Richm nd  

told

 Mr.

 Huggins 

that 

he sh uld

 n t 

participate in the Finance  meeting. Mr. Huggins, initially misunderstanding 

because he  is a regular participant  in the Finance  mmittee  meeting, assured  Mr.  

Richm nd  that he w uld stay and that staying was n t a pr blem. Mr. Richm nd  

repeated  several times that Mr. Huggins sh uld n t

 participate

 and  that he  sh uld

 

just

 

g

ahead

 

and

 

leave.

32.

 

Mr.

 

Huggins 

f ll wed Mr.

 

Richm nd

’s 

unusual  instruction and  

left

 

the

 

meeting area.

 uma Resources,

 the 

General Counsel,

 

and

 

a

 hospital detective 

escort  

Mr uggins to the legal department, hassle him  about  his audit, and place

him

 

on  unpaid administrative 

leave

33.

 

After

 

leaving

 

the

 

meeting

 

area,

 

Vice

 

President

 

of

 

H man

 

Res urces

 

Deb

 

Warman,

 

General  unsel

 Michael  

D.

 Phillips,

 

and a 

hospital detective

 

c nfr nted

 

Mr. 

Huggins

 

in 

the

 hallway  utside 

the

 b ardr m.

 

They  asked Mr.

 

Huggins

 

to 

c me

 

with 

them

 

to 

a

 

c nference

 

r m

 

in 

the legal 

office.

 Mr.

 

Huggins c mplied 

with  

that instruction.

34.  During 

the

 meeting in 

the

 c nference r m  in the legal office, Ms. Wa man 

told Mr.

 

Huggins  that 

there

 had  been a 

c mplaint

 ab ut his  w rk.

35.  Mr.  Phillips c mplained that Mr. Huggins  

was

 l king 

at

 rec rds that he  

“had n business l king at” and 

 verstepping

 

his  b unds” as  

an

 empl yee.

Page 6 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 8/33

36.

  Mr.

 Phillips 

asked Mr.

 

Huggins

 

questi ns

 

ab ut why 

he

 was

 

accessing certain 

rec rds

 

ab ut Dr.

 

B utr s

’s 

expenses

 

and making  copies

 

of  

certain

 

files

 regarding  

th se

 

expenditures.

37.  In  Mr. Huggins ’s capacity as  

an

 auditor, he  reviews financial things like 

expenses pr cessed thr ugh acc unts payable. Mr. Huggins  explained that, under  

the Internal Audit  harter, the Audit  mmittee of the Metr Health B ard of 

Trustees

 has  granted

 

permissi n

 

for

 his

 

department  

to review all d cuments and

 

records,

 

b th

 

pers nal

 

and

 

property,

 

within

 

the

 

system.

38.

  Mr.

 Phillips 

asked Mr.

 

Huggins

 

why he used

 

a flash

 drive

 to

 

store 

files when

 

he had  rem te access.

39.

  Mr.

 

Huggins

 explained

 that 

he

 used a flash drive because he had  b th  

a

 

deskt p

 

and a lapt p c mputer and  

the

 flash drive all wed him  to easily transition 

between

 

the

 

two.

40.

  Mr.

 Phillips 

asked Mr.

 Huggins  

if

 he 

was

 

aware

 of

 any

 illegal activity that

 

Mr. Phillips

 sh uld

 

be

 made  

aware

  f.

41.

 

In  

resp nse,

 Mr.

 

Huggins  reiterated his 

earlier

 reports and also referenced

 

Mr.

 Phillips’

s

 practice

 

of 

signing 

the

 

invoices 

to appr ve payment to his

  wn

 private 

law 

firm.

42.

  Mr.

 Phillips told

 

Mr.

 Huggins  that 

he

 was  

being

 placed

 

n administrative 

leave 

pending

 an “investigation.”

43.  Ms. 

Wa an

 inf rmed Mr.

 

Huggins  that 

the

 administrative leave w uld be 

unpaid.

Page

 7

 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 9/33

44.

  Mr.

 

Huggins

 

asked Ms.

 Wa man

 if

 

he  w uld use  pers nal time

 

off (PTO) 

during 

the

 leave

 (as

 he was

 aware

 

ther empl yees 

had  

been

 permitted to

 

do).

 

The  

head

 

of

 H man 

Res urces 

said that she did n t 

kn w

 if

 Mr.

 Huggins

 

c uld use  PTO 

for

 this 

purp se.

45. 

At

 the meeting ’s conclusion, Ms. Wa man confiscated Mr.  Huggins ’s keys to 

his  office and desk, his  hospital ID,  his silver SanDisk  ruzer flash drive, and the 

materials fr m the audit meeting

 

that Mr. Huggins  

had  in

 

his

 

possession.

46.

 

Bef re

 

being

 

escorted

 off 

of

 

hospital

 

property,

 

Mr.

 

Huggins

 

was

 

n t

 

permitted

 

to retrieve 

pers nal

 items fr m his

 

office.

Claim

  :

Whistleblower Retaliation under R C 4113 52( )

47.

 

Plaintiff 

inc rp rates

 all 

previ us

 

allegations.

48.

 

In  the c urse 

of

 Mr. Huggins ’s empl yment, he

 became

 

aware

 of crimes that

 

Metr Health had 

the

 

auth rity

 

to

 

correct.

49.

  In  

the

 c urse of

 

Mr.

 

Huggins

’s 

empl yment,

 

he became  aware

 

of

 

violations

 

of 

state law by  fellow empl yees.

50.  Mr.

 

Huggins

 made

 reas nable and good-faith 

efforts

 to determine the 

accuracy  of  the inf rmati n he  reported.

51.

 

Mr.

 

Huggins

 

reas nably

 

believed

 

that

 

the

 

c nduct

 

he

 

identified

 

during

 

the

 

Audit  mmittee  meeting and in his audit report regarding  the theft of B t x 

was

 a

 

felony.

Page 8

 of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 10/33

52.

  Mr.

 

Huggins

 reas nably

 believed that 

the

 c nduct he identified during 

the

 

Audit 

mmittee

 meeting

 

and

 

in

 his 

audit

 

report

 regarding  

Dr.

 B utr s a 

public

 

empl yee

 

accepting

 payment  for 

pers nal

 

travel 

expenses

 

was  a felony.

53.  December 15, 2015, Mr. Huggins  gave a presentati n to the Audit 

mmittee  of the B ard of Trustees in which  he notified resp nsible officers of the 

violations.

54.

 

Mr.  Huggins ’s oral

 

rep rt 

at

 the Audit  mmittee  meeting satisfied the 

oral- 

report

 

requirements

 

of

 

R. .

 

4113.52(A)(1)(a).

55.

  Mr.

 

Huggins

’s oral

 rep rt

 

at 

the

 

Audit 

mmittee

 meeting

 satisfied 

the 

oral- 

report

 requirements

 of 

R. . 4113.52(A)(3).

56.

  Mr.

 

Huggins

 

also

 

sent

 

written

 a 

written

 rep rt pr viding

 sufficient 

detail to 

identify and  describe 

the

 violations to 

the

 following resp nsible 

officers:

raig  

Richm nd

 

( hief

 

Financial

 

Officer);

 

Dan

 

Lewis

 

( hief

 

Operating

 

Officer);

 

Al

 

nners ( hief

 

Quality Officer); Abel T rres

 

(Executive Direct r and 

hairman  for  

Dermat l gy); 

and Brendan  Patters n 

( linical

 Service Line Leader  

for

 the gr up

 

ver 

Dermat l gy).

57.

  Mr.

 

Huggins

’s written

 

audit

 rep rt

 

satisfied the 

written-report

 requirements  

of

 

R. . 4113.52(A)(1)(a).

58.

  Mr.

 

Huggins

’s written

 

audit

 rep rt

 

satisfied the 

written-report

 requirements  

of R. . 4113.52(A)(3).

59.  Rather than  make  a good-faith effort to correct the violations 

Mr.

 Huggins  

reported,

 

Metr Health

 placed him   n

 

unpaid 

administrative

 leave.

Page 9 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 11/33

60.

  Mr.

 

Huggins

 

was 

n t

 

permitted

 to use

 

T during his administrative leave.

61.

 

Metr Health

 retaliated 

against

 

Mr.

 

Huggins

 because he rep rted criminal 

activity.

62.  As  a direct and pr ximate result 

of

 Metr Health’s illegal actions, Mr.  

Huggins  has  suffered ec n mic and n n-ec n mic damages  in 

an

 am unt  to be 

determined at trial.

63.

 

Mr.  Huggins  is entitled to punitive 

damages

 

based

  n Metr Health’s

 

intentional

 

and

 

malici us

 

acts.

P ye fo el ef

F r

 

the

 reas ns

 

state ab ve,

 

Plaintiff

 

respectfully requests

 the

 following relief

 

fr m  

the 

ourt:

A.   Declare that Defendants   acts

 

and c nduct 

constitute

 violations

 

of Ohi

law;

B.   Enter  judgment  in Plaintif

f

s fav r as  to all claims for relief;

 .  Award Plaintiff full c mpensat ry damages, ec n mic and n n-ec n mic, 

including, 

but

 

n t

 limited to, back  pay,

 front

 pay, damages  

for

 pain and  

suffering,

 

mental  

anguish,

 

em ti nal

 

distress,

 

humiliation,

 and

 

inc nvenience

 that Plaintiff

 has 

suffered and is 

reas nably

 certain 

to

 

suffer

 in 

the 

future;

D.

 

Award

 

Plaintiff 

punitive

 

damages

 

for intentional

 

and  

malici us violations

 

of 

Ohi

law;

E.

 

Award

 

pre-judgment

 

and

 

p st-judgment

 interest at

 

the

 

highest

 lawful

 

rate;

F.

 

Award

 Plaintiff

 

his

 

reas nable 

att rneys

 

fees

 (including expert fees)

 

and  

all  ther costs of suit;

G.

 

Order

 Metr Health 

to

 return Mr.

 

Huggins

’s 

pers nal 

property;

H.  

Award

 all  ther relief in law or equity to which Plaintiff is

 

entitled and  

that

 

the  urt deems equitable,

 

just, 

or

 proper.

Page 

10  of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 12/33

Jury

 dem d

Plaintiff demands

 

a trial 

by

 jury  n all issues within this  mplaint.

Dated: December  21,

 

2015

Respectfully submitted,

  Subodh C an ra_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Sub dh

 

handra (0069233)

Ashlie

 

ase

 

Sletvold 

(0079477)

Harris n 

Blythe

 (00093851)

THE 

HANDRA 

W FIRM, LL

1265 

W. 6

th  St.,

 

Suite 400

 

leveland,

 

OH

 

44113-1326

 

216.578.1700 Ph ne

 

216.578.1800 Fax

Sub dh. handra@ handraLaw.c m

Ashlie.Sletv ld@ handraLaw.c m

Harris n.Blythe@ handraLaw.c m

Attorney

for Plaintiff

 Simp on Huggin

III

 equest

 

for

 

ervice

T

the

 

clerk:

Please 

issue

 

the 

Summ ns

 

and  mplaint  and

 

serve the

 

mplaint

 and

 

acc mpanying disc very requests 

at

 the addresses listed ab ve, making

 

return 

acc rding

 

to law.

  Subodh 

C an ra

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

One

 

of 

the attorney for

 

Plaintiff Simp on Huggin III

Page 

11 of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 13/33

IN

 

THE 

OURT OF  MM N  LEAS 

UYAHOGA 

OUNTY,

 OH

Simpson 

Huggins

 

III

Plaintiff,  ase No.

vs.

Judge

The MetroHealth System

Defendant.

P  intiff

 

First  et  of  Requests for   dmission Directed to  Defend nt  

T

he  Metro

 e th   ystem

 

under

 

Ohio C

iv

 R 36

Under  Ohio Rule of  ivil Procedure 36, Plaintiff requests that Defendant  

respond

 to Plaintiff’s First Set of Requests for Admission within  8 days 

of

 service. 

These

 

requests

 

are

 

to

 

be

 

answered

 

completely

 

and

 

fully,

 

in

 

writing,

 

and

 

under

 

oath.

 f 

timely

 

responses

 are 

not

 

received,

 the 

requests

 

will

 be admitted

consistent

 with  iv.R. 36.

  STRUCT O S

A.   Definitions. In  answering each request, use the following definitions:

1.   The  word “MetroHealth” refers to Defendant  The  MetroHealth System.

2.

 

“And

 

and

 

“or”

 

shall be  construed

 either 

disjunctively

 

or

 

conjunctively  

as

 necessary

 

to

 bring 

within

 

the 

scope

 

of

 the 

request

 all 

responses

 that might

 

otherwise

 be

 construed to

 be

 outside its

scope.

3. 

“Any

 includes the

 word

 

“all,

” 

and  “all” includes

 the

 word

 

“any.

Page

 1

 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 14/33

B.

 

These

 requests

 

for admissi n shall be

 

deemed  

c ntinuing

 in nature and  

are

 to 

be

 supplemented

 as

 additional

 inf rmati n pertinent to any  request is obtained, 

including,

 but

 

n t

 limited 

to,

 

additional

 inf rmati n that adds to

 

a previ us 

resp nse, corrects a previ us resp nse, and/ r clarifies a previ us response.

 .  If objection is made, the reas ns 

for

 y ur  objection shall be stated. 

The

 

answer shall specifically  deny  the matter  or set  forth in detail the reas ns why y u 

cann t

 truthfully

 

admit 

or

 deny

 

the matter. A denial 

shall fairly

 meet the substance

 

of

 

the

 

requested

 

admissi n,

 

and

 

when

 

g d

 

faith

 

requires

 

that

 

y u

 

qualify

 

y ur

 

answer,

 

or

 

deny  

nly

 a part of

 the

 matter  

of 

which an 

admissi n

 is

 

requested,

 y u

 

shall 

specify so

 

much  of

 

it as

 

is

 

true and

 

qualify or

 

deny  

the

 

remainder. 

Y u

  y

 n t 

give lack of

 

inf rmati n or kn wledge

 

as

 

reas n

 

for

 failure to 

admit

 or deny  

unless

 

y u state that y u have 

made

 reas nable inquiry and that 

the

 inf rmati n 

kn wn

 or  

readily

 

btainable

 

by

 

y u

 

is

 

insufficient

 

to

 

enable

 

y u

 

to

 

admit

 

or

 

deny.

 

If

 

y u

 

c nsider

 

that 

a

 matter 

of

 which 

an

 admissi n has been

 requested presents

 a

 

genuine issue for trial, y u  y not,  n that gr und alone, object to the request; y u

 

may,

 

subject to the provisions of

 

iv.R. 37( ),

 

deny

 

the matter 

or

 

set

 

forth

 reas ns

 

why  y u cann t 

admit

 or

 deny

 it.

REQUESTS 

FOR 

DMISSIO

1.  

Admit

 

that 

Simps n

 

Huggins

 as 

of

 December 

15,

 

2015 was

 the Director

 of

Internal Audit 

for 

Metr Health.

RESPO SE:

Page 2

 of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 15/33

2.  Admit  that in  December 

2015, 

Metr Health General

 

unsel Michael  D.  

Phillips told Simps n Huggins  that he had “n business l king at” records 

regarding expenditures for Metr Health

 

hief

 

Executive Officer Akram  

B utr s.

 ESPO SE:

3.

 

Admit  that 

in

 December 2015, 

Metr Health

 General 

unsel

 Michael D.

 

Phillips

 told Simps n 

Huggins

 that

 he

 had 

 verstepped 

his

 b unds”

 

regarding

 his audit of

 

expenditures 

for

 

Metr Health

 

hief

 Executive Officer 

Akram  B utr s.

 ESPO SE:

4.

 

Admit

 

that

 

n

 

December

 

15,

 

2015,

 

Metr Health

 

placed

 

Simps n

 

Huggins

 

n

 

unpaid

 administrative leave.

 ESPO SE:

5. 

Admit

 

that

 

Metr Health

 pr m ted

 Simps n

 Huggins

 to

 

the

 position 

of

 

Direct r of Internal Audit  n appr ximately July 22,

 

2013.

 ESPO SE:

6.  Admit  that

 

ne of

 Simps n

 Huggins

’s

 

duties as the 

Direct r 

of

 Internal Audit 

is

 

perf rming

 

an

 

annual

 

financial

 

internal

 

rep rting

 

control

 

audit.

 ESPO SE:

7.   Admit  that 

ne

 of Simps n Huggins ’s duties as the Direct r of

 

Internal Audit 

is rep rting to 

the

 Audit  mmittee  of

 

the B ard of 

Trustees

 regarding 

the

 

results of his auditing activity.

 ESPO SE:

8.  Admit  that  n December

 

15,

 2015,

 

Simps n

 Huggins  

made

 a 

presentati n

 

to

 

the

 

Audit 

mmittee

 

of

 the

 B ard

 

of

 

Trustees.

 ESPO SE:

9.

 

Admit  that  n December 15, 2015,

 

Simps n Huggins  rep rted to 

Michael 

Phillips,

 

Dan  

Lewis, 

Alfred

 

nn rs, 

raig

 Richm nd,

 

Abel Torres, 

Brendan

 

Patterson,

 

and Mary  Legerski that he had  unc vered 

theft

 

at

 

the 

Metr Health Pepper Pike Dermat l gy  linic.

 ESPO SE:

Page 3 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 16/33

10.  Admit  that

 

n December

 

15,

 2015,

 

Simps n

 Huggins

 

rep rted 

to

 Michael 

Phillips,

 Dan  Lewis, Alfred  nn rs,  raig Richm nd, Abel Torres, Brendan  

Patterson,

 and 

Mary

 Legerski that he had  

unc vered

 theft at the 

Metr Health

 

Pepper

 

Pike

 

Dermat l gy

 

linic,

 

including

 

the

 

fact

 

that

 

tw

Metr Health

 

vice

 presidents

 

had  

received

 

free 

B t x injections.

 ESPO SE:

11. 

Admit  that  n December 

15,

 2015,

 

Simps n 

Huggins

 rep rted to

 Michael 

Phillips,

 Dan  Lewis, Alfred 

nn rs,

  raig

 

Richm nd, Abel Torres,

 

Brendan  

Patterson, and 

Mary

 Legerski that he had  

unc vered

 theft at the 

Metr Health Pepper 

Pike

 Dermat l gy  linic, including the fact that a 

relative

 

of

 a Metr Health 

resident

 had  received free B t x injections.

 ESPO SE:

12. 

Admit  that  n

 

December 

15,

 2015,

 

Simps n

 Huggins

 rep rted

 

to

 Michael 

Phillips,

 

Dan  

Lewis,

 Alfred  nn rs,  raig Richm nd, Abel Torres, 

Brendan

 

Patterson,

 and 

Mary

 Legerski

 

and 

that he

 had  unc vered theft

 

at

 

the 

Metr Health Pepper 

Pike

 Dermat l gy  linic, 

including

 the fact that 

the 

Metr Health 

empl yee

 administering free B t x injections had  failed to 

rec rd the lot number  and expiration dates for the vials used.

 ESPO SE:

13.

 

Admit

 

that

 

the

 

standard

 

charge

 

for

 

a

 

single

 

B t x

 

treatment

 

at

 

Metr Health

 

Pepper

 Pike

 Dermat l gy

 

linic

 is

 

appr ximately

 

$729.

 ESPO SE:

14.  Admit  that theft of

 

pr perty or services valued at m re  than $1,000 is

 a

 

felony.

 ESPO SE:

15. 

Admit  that B t x is 

a

 

danger us

 

drug

 

as

 that

 

term

 

is used 

in

 Ohi ’s theft

 

statute,

 

R. .

 

2913.02.

 ESPO SE:

16.  Admit  that theft of a “danger us

 

drug

 (as that 

term

 is used in Ohi

’s

 

theft

 

statute, R. . 2913.02) c uld

 

be c nsidered a felony.

 ESPO SE:

Page 4 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 17/33

17.  Admit  that

 

Dr.

 

B utr s

’s 

kn wing  receipt of

 

public hospital funds

 

to pay  for  

pers nal travel 

expenses

 c uld be  c nsidered a felony.

 ESPO SE:

18.  Admit  that during 

Simps n

 Huggins ’s

 presentati n

 to the 

Audit  mmittee

 

of  the B ard of Trustees 

n

 

December 15,

 2015,

 

Simps n Huggins 

rep rted 

that he  had  unc vered impr per controls by 

Metr Health

 executives.

 ESPO SE:

19. 

Admit

 

that 

during 

Simps n

 Huggins

s

 presentati n

 to the 

Audit  mmittee

 

of  the B ard of Trustees  n 

December 

15, 2015,

 

Simps n Huggins 

rep rted

 

that he  had  unc vered impr per pr cedures regarding  c rp rate credit-card 

usage.

 ESPO SE:

20.   Admit  that during Simps n Huggins ’s presentati n to the Audit

 

mmittee  

of  the B ard

 

of Trustees 

n

 

December 15,

 2015,

 

Simps n

 

Huggins 

rep rted 

that he  

had

 unc vered 

failure

 to enforce written policies regarding

 

submissi n of

 receipts

 to justify and

 

d cument expenses.

 ESPO SE:

21.

 

Admit

 

that

 

n

 

December

 

15,

 

2015,

 

Bryan

 

Licht,

 

at

 

Simps n

 

Huggins

s

 

direction, 

emailed

 

a

 

c py

 of 

Mr.

 

Huggins

 s 

written

 

audit

 

report

 

regarding

 

B t x theft and  impr per expenditures  n behalf of

 

Dr. 

B utr s

 to  raig

 

Richm nd, Dan  Lewis, Al  nners, Abel Torres, and Brendan  Patterson.

 ESPO SE:

22.   Admit  that

 

Simps n

 

Huggins

 exercised 

due

 diligence 

and reas nable care in 

investigating  

the violations he

 raised

 

in his

 presentati n 

at

 the

 Audit 

mmittee meeting  n December

 

15, 2015 and in his  

written

 audit report 

pr vided that same day.

 ESPO SE:

23.   Admit  that during

 

the Audit  mmittee  meeting  n December 15, 2015, 

Metr Health terminated  Simps n Huggins

’s 

email access.

 ESPO SE:

Page 5 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 18/33

24.   Admit  that

 during

 the c urse

 

of

 

his  empl yment with 

Metr Health,

 Simps n  

Huggins typically attended the Finance 

mmittee

 meeting that follows the 

Audit 

mmittee

 

meeting.

 ESPO SE:

25.

 

Admit  that  n December 

15,

 2015,

  hief 

Financial 

Officer

  raig

 

Richm nd

 

repeatedly  told Simps n Huggins  that he sh uld 

n t

 participate in 

the 

Finance  mmittee  meeting

 that

 day.

 ESPO SE:

26.   Admit  that following

 

the Audit  mmittee  

meeting

  n December

 

15, 2015, 

hief Financial Officer  raig Richm nd told

 

Simps n Huggins  that he sh uld 

just

 

g

ahead

 

and

 

leave

 

and

 

n t

 

participate

 

in

 

the

 

Finance

 

mmittee

 

meeting

 that 

day.

 ESPO SE:

27.

 

Admit  that following

 

the Audit  mmittee  

meeting

  n December

 

15, 2015,

 

Vice

 President for H man Res urces Deb  Wa man and General  unsel 

Michael Phillips 

met

 with Simps n Huggins.

 ESPO SE:

28.

 

Admit

 

that

 

during

 

the

 

meeting

 

with

 

Simps n

 

Huggins,

 

Deb

 

Warman,

 

and

 

Michael

 Phillips 

n December 15, 2015,

 Mr. Phillips 

questi ned 

Mr.  

Huggins  

ab ut why  he was

 

accessing 

certain

 records.

 ESPO SE:

29.   Admit  that

 during

 

the 

meeting with 

Simps n

 Huggins, 

Deb

 

Warman,

 

and

 

Michael Phillips  n 

December 15, 2015,

 Mr. Phillips questi ned Mr.  Huggins

 

ab ut why  he was c pying certain files.

 ESPO SE:

30.

 

Admit

 that 

during

 

the

 

meeting

 

with

 

Simps n

 

Huggins,

 

Deb

 

Warman,

 

and

 

Michael Phillips  n December 15, 2015, Mr. Phillips questi ned Mr.  Huggins  

ab ut why  

he

 was 

using

 a flash drive.

 ESPO SE:

Page 6 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 19/33

31.

  Admit  that

 during

 the

 

meeting with 

Simps n

 Huggins, 

Deb

 

Warman,

 

and

 

Michael Phillips  n December 15, 

2015,

 Mr. Phillips and/ r Ms. Wa an 

confiscated Mr. Huggins ’s

 

flash drive.

 ESPO SE:

32.

 

Admit  that during

 

the meeting

 with

 Simps n Huggins,

 

Deb  Warman,

 

and

 

Michael Phillips  n 

December 

15,

 2015,

 Mr. Phillips and/ r Ms. Wa an

 

confiscated

 

Mr.

 Huggins

s

 hospital 

identification card.

 ESPO SE:

33.  Admit  that during

 

the meeting 

with

 Simps n Huggins,

 

Deb  Warman,

 

and  

Michael Phillips  n December 15, 2015,

 

Mr. Phillips

 

and/ r Ms. Wa an 

confiscated

 

Mr.

 

Huggins

s

 

keys

 

to

 

his

 

office

 

filing

 

cabinet.

 ESPO SE:

34.  Admit  that during the meeting with Simps n Huggins, Deb  

Warman,

 and  

Michael

 Phillips 

n December 15, 2015,

 Mr. Phillips 

and/ r Ms.

 Wa an

 

confiscated d cuments Mr.

 

Huggins had  received 

during

 the Audit

 

mmittee

 

meeting.

 ESPO SE:

35.

 

Admit

 

that

 

during

 

the

 

meeting

 

with

 

Simps n

 

Huggins,

 

Deb

 

Warman,

 

and

 

Michael

 Phillips 

n

 

December

 15, 

2015,

 

Mr.

 Phillips 

asked

 

Mr.

 

Huggins

 if  

there

 

was

 any illegal activity of which  Mr. Phillips sh uld

 be

 aware.

 ESPO SE:

36.  Admit  that during the meeting with Simps n Huggins, Deb  Warman, and  

Michael

 Phillips 

n December 15, 2015,

 

in 

resp nse

 to Mr. 

Phillips’s

 questi n 

ab ut 

whether

 was

 any

 

illegal activity of 

which

 he sh uld be  aware, Mr.

 

Huggins

 resp nded 

by

 

referencing

 

the

 B t x theft 

and

 Mr.

 Phillips’

s practice 

of 

signing 

the invoices to 

appr ve

 

payment

 to

 his

  wn

 law 

firm.

 ESPO SE:

37.  Admit  that during

 

the meeting with Simps n Huggins, Deb  Warman, and  

Michael Phillips  n December 15, 2015,

 

Mr.

 

Phillips

 

and/ r Ms. Wa an told 

Mr.  Huggins  that he 

was

 being placed  n unpaid  

administrative

 leave.

 ESPO SE:

Page

 7

 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 20/33

38.

  Admit  that

 

n December

 

15,

 2015, 

Metr Health placed

 

Simps n

 

Huggins

 

n  

unpaid 

administrative

 leave.

 ESPO SE:

39.

  Admit  that following the

 

meeting with

 Simps n

 Huggins,

 Deb  

Warman, 

and

 

Michael Phillips 

n

 

December 15, 2015,

 Mr. Huggins 

was

 

esc rted

 fr m the

 

building

 

with ut

 

being permitted to retrieve his  pers nal items fr m his

 

office.

 ESPO SE:

40.  Admit  that Simps n Huggins  

c nducted

 internal audits 

at

 

Metr Health

 in 

the c urse of his empl yment.

 ESPO SE:

41.  Admit  that during

 

the 

c urse

 of

 

Simps n Huggins ’s empl yment, he became  

aware of crimes that Metr Health had  

the

 auth rity to correct.

 ESPO SE:

42.

  Admit  that during the c urse of 

Simps n

 Huggins

’s 

empl yment, he became  

aware

 

of

 violations by state 

law by  fellow

 empl yees.

 ESPO SE:

43.  Admit  that Simps n Huggins  made  

reas nable

 and good-faith efforts to 

determine

 

the

 accuracy  of  

the

 inf rmati n that

 

he

 

rep rted to Metr Health

 

n December 15,

 

2015.

 ESPO SE:

44.

  Admit  that it was  reas nable for 

Simps n

 

Huggins

 

to

 believe that the theft of 

B t x and  ther services fr m the Metr Health Pepper 

Pike

 Dermat l gy  

linic

 was

 

a felony.

 ESPO SE:

45.

 

Admit

 

that

 it was reas nable for 

Simps n

 

Huggins to

 believe that the use

 

of 

public hospital funds to pay for Dr.

 

B utr s’

s

 pers nal travel 

expenses

 

was

 

felony.

 ESPO SE:

Page 8

 of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 21/33

46.

  Admit  that

 

n December

 

15,

 2015,

 

Simps n

 Huggins  

orally

 notified 

resp nsible

 officers at Metr Health of potential felony criminal activity.

 ESPO SE:

47.

  Admit  that Simps n

 Huggins ’

presentati n

 

to

 the Audit

 

mmittee

 

December 

15,

 2015

 

satisfied the 

oral-report requirements

 of

R. . 

4113.52(A)(1)(a).

 ESPO SE:

48.

 

Admit

 

that 

Simps n

 Huggins ’

presentati n

 

to

 

the

 

Audit 

mmittee

  n

 

December 15, 2015

 

satisfied the oral-report 

requirements

 of

R. . 4113.52(A)(3).

 ESPO SE:

49.  Admit  that Simps n Huggins ’

s

 written audit 

report

 transmitted  n 

December

 

15, 2015 satisfied 

the

 

written-report

 requirements  of R. . 4113.52(A)(1)(a).

 ESPO SE:

50.

  Admit  that 

Simps n

 

Huggins ’

written

 

audit

 report transmitted  n December 

15, 

2015 satisfied the written-report 

requirements

 of R. .

 

4113.52(A)(3).

 ESPO SE:

51.  Admit  that General  unsel Michael D. Phillips is 

a

 “resp nsible officer” of 

Metr Health

 

as

 that term

 

is used 

in 

R. .

 

4113.52(A)(1)(a) and R. .

 

4113.52(A)(3).

 ESPO SE:

52.

  Admit  that  hief 

Operating

 Officer Dan  Lewis is a 

resp nsible 

officer

” of 

Metr Health as  that term is used 

in

 R. .

 

4113.52(A)(1)(a) and R. . 

4113.52(A)(3).

 ESPO SE:

53.

 

Admit

 

that 

hief 

Quality

 Officer Alfred

 

nn rs

 

is

 

resp nsible

 

officer

” 

of 

Metr Health

 as  that term is used 

in

 R. .

 

4113.52(A)(1)(a) and R. .

 

4113.52(A)(3).

 ESPO SE:

Page 9 

of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 22/33

54.

  Admit  that  hief 

Financial

 Officer

 

raig 

Richm nd

 is a

 “

resp nsible

 officer”

 

of  Metr Health as  that term is used in R. . 4113.52(A)(1)(a) and  R. . 

4113.52(A)(3).

 ESPO SE:

55.

 

Admit  that

 

Executive

 

Direct r and 

hairman

 

for Dermat l gy  Abel

 

T rres

 is

 

a

 “resp nsible officer” of 

Metr Health

 as  that term  is used in R. .

 

4113.52(A)(1)(a) and R. .

 

4113.52(A)(3).

 ESPO SE:

56.  Admit  that  linical Services 

Line

 Leader  Brendan  Patters n is 

a

 “resp nsible 

officer” of  Metr Health as  that term is used in R. . 4113.52(A)(1)(a)  and R. . 

4113.52(A)(3).

 ESPO SE:

57.  Admit  that  hief  mpliance Officer 

Mary

 Legerski is a “resp nsible officer

 

of  

Metr Health as

 that

 

term

 is

 

used in 

R. .

 

4113.52(A)(1)(a) 

and  

R. .

 

4113.52(A)(3).

 ESPO SE:

58.

  Admit  that

 Simps n Huggins ’

written

 

audit

 report

 

December

 15,

 

2015  

pr vided

 

sufficient

 

detail

 

to

 

identify

 

and

 

describe

 

the

 

potential

 

felony

 

criminal

 activity 

he

 

had

 

unc vered

 

during

 his  audit.

 ESPO SE:

59.

  Admit  that 

Metr Health

 retaliated against 

Simps n

 Huggins  because he  

rep rted felony criminal activity.

 ESPO SE:

60.

  Admit  that 

Metr Health

 did 

n t

 

notify

 

Simps n

 Huggins,  in writing,

 

of

 any

 

effort

 of 

Metr Health

 to

 

correct the violations 

he

 

had  reported.

 ESPO SE:

Page 

10  of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 23/33

December 21, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

  Subodh

 

Chandra

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Sub dh

  handra

 

(0069233)

Ashlie

  ase 

Sletvold

 (0079477)

Harris n Blythe 

(00093851)

THE

 

HANDRA 

W

 FIRM,

 

LL

1265 W. 6th  St., Suite 400 

leveland, OH

 

44113-1326  

216.578.1700 

Ph ne  

216.578.1800 

Fax

Sub dh. handra@ handraLaw.c m

Ashlie.Sletv ld@ handraLaw.c m

Harris n.Blythe@ handraLaw.c m

Coun el for

 

Plaintiff

 Simp on 

Huggin

III

 ertificate

 of   ervice

certify 

that the ab ve 

disc very requests

 were 

submitted

 to the  lerk’s

 

Office to 

be  

served with the Summ ns

 

and  mplaint.

 

bodh

 

Chandra

_ _ _ _ _ _ _

One of the

 attorney

for 

Plaintiff

 

Simp on

 Huggin

III

Page 

11 of 11

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 24/33

IN

 

THE 

OURT OF  MM N  LEAS 

UYAHOGA 

OUNTY,

 OH

Simpson 

Huggins

 

III

Plaintiff,  ase No.

vs.

Judge

The MetroHealth System

Defendant.

P  intiff  First  et  of   equests for Production  of   ocuments  irected  

to   efend nt

 

T

he

 Metro e th   ystem

 

under

 

Ohio 

iv 

6

Under  Ohio Rule of  ivil Procedure 34, Plaintiff requests that Defendant  

respond 

to 

Plaintiff’s

 First Requests for 

Production

 of

 

Documents  within 28  

days

 of

 

service.

instructions

A.

  Definitions. In  

answering

 each request,

 

use  the following definitions:

1.   The  

words

 “you

 or “MetroHealth

 refer 

to

 Defendant  The  MetroHealth 

System, the party responding  to these requests, and/or  its agents, employees, 

attorneys, representatives, and/or assigns.

2.

  The

 terms 

“document,”

 

“documents,

” “record,” 

or

 “

records

” 

mean  

the

 

original and 

a copy,

 

regardless

 of origin 

or

 location,

 

of

 

any

 writing or 

records of

 any  

type 

or

 

description,

 whether  official 

or 

unofficial, 

including,

 

but

 not limited to, 

the 

original 

and any  copy of

 any

 book,

 

pamphlet,

 

periodical, letter, memorandum,  

telegram,

 

report,

 

record, study,

 

inter- or intra-office communication,

 

handwritten

 

or

Page

 1

 

of 

10

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 25/33

 ther

 

note,

 w rking 

paper, 

publication,

 

permit, 

ledger

 and/ r

 

journal, 

whether

 

general

 or

 

special,

 chart, 

paper, graph, 

survey,

 index tape, 

disk,

 

data

 sheet,

 

or

 

data- 

pr cessing card,

 or

 

any

 

ther

 written, 

recorded,

 transcribed,  

filed, 

or graphic 

matter, h wever pr duced or repr duced, to which  Defendant had  access or n w  has 

access. “D cument” or “d cuments” also includes any magnetically, mechanically, 

and/ r electronically stored, maintained, and/ r rec rded data, whether the 

data

 

consists of 

w rds, symb ls,

 numbers, 

graphs,

 

or

  ther matters, 

including

 

but

 

n t 

limited

 

to

 

email.

3. 

And

” 

and  “or

 

shall

 be  c nstrued

 

either

 

disjunctively or conjunctively  

as

 necessary

 to bring within 

the 

sc pe of

 the

 request all resp nses

 

that might  

therwise

 be  c nstrued to be

 

utside 

its

scope.

4. 

“Any

” includes 

the

 w rd “all,” and  “all” includes 

the

 w rd “any.

5.

 

Regarding

 

means

 

relating

 

to,

 

c ncerning,

 

containing,

 

consisting

 

f,

 

referring

 to, 

reflecting, 

supporting,

 dem nstrating, sh wing,

 

identifying, 

menti ning, 

contradicting,

 prepared 

in

 c nnecti n with, used 

in

 preparati n for,

 

pertaining to, having any 

relationship

 to, evidencing, constituting evidence  f,  or

 

being

 in any  

way

 

legally, 

logically,

 

or factually 

c nnected

 with 

the 

matter

 discussed.

B.

 

These

 requests 

seek

 electronic c mmunicati ns

 n t  nly

 fr m w rk  email 

addresses but

 

also 

pers nal 

email

 addresses.

 .  F r each request or part of a request that Defendant  refuses to answer  n  

gr unds of  

burdens meness,

 state:

1.

  The

 number of files and/ r 

d cuments

 needed

 

to

 be

 searched;

Page 2

 of 

10

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 26/33

2.

The  location of such files; and

3. The

 appr ximate

 time it  w uld 

take

 to c nduct a

 search

 

for

 the 

requested 

information.

D.   These requests 

for

 pr ducti n shall be  deemed  c ntinuing in nature and  

Defendant’s resp nses are to be  supplemented as  additional inf rmati n or  

d cuments pertinent to a request is  btained or created, including, but n t limited 

to, additional inf rmati n

 

that 

adds

 to 

previ us resp nse, corrects 

a

 previ us

 

resp nse,

 

and/ r

 

clarifies 

a

 

previ us

 

response.

E.  Privileges

1. F r each 

request

 or 

part

 of

 

a request that Defendant  refuses

 to

 answer 

n gr unds

 

of

 privilege,

 state:

a.  The

 specific

 privilege asserted;

b.

 

The

 

basis

 

for

 

the

 

privilege;

 

and

c.

  The

 

identity

 of the d cuments 

and/ r

 inf rmati n 

claimed

 to

 be  

privileged.

F.

  Inf rmati n

 

requested

 is any and all inf rmati n within the kn wledge of

 

Defendant  resp nding to these 

requests 

and/ r 

its 

agents,

 

empl yees,

 attorneys,

 

representatives,

 and/ r

 

assigns.

G.  

Plaintiff 

requests that,

 

to preserve  paper and reduce c pying costs,

 where

 

feasible, d cuments resp nsive to the requests bel w be pr vided  n  D, n t in a 

hard-c py paper f rmat.

 

Plaintiff

 

requests that,

 

with the excepti ns

 

n ted bel w, 

each 

page of 

each

 d cument

 be

 Bates-stamped

 

for

 

identification.

Page 3 

of 

10

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 27/33

H.  

S me

 of  these requests

 

are

 

directed to electronically

 

stored information,

including emails and  

w rd-pr cessing

 

d cuments

 stored  n Defendant

’s 

c mputers, 

where practical,

 resp nsive

 inf rmati n

 sh uld

 be  pr duced in 

native

 f rmat, n t 

c nverted to images or printouts. Plaintiff d es n t require that such d cuments be 

pr duced with Bates-stamps, pr vided each d cument has a unique file name. In  

the event of high costs of  pr ducti n costs 

(exceeding

 $250), Plaintiff requests that 

Defendant

’s c unsel appr ach 

Plaintiff’s

 c unsel to 

confer

 regarding

 

cost-saving  

or  

cost-sharing

 

measures

 

(including

 

narr wing

 

the

 

bel w

 

requests)

 

bef re

 

g ing

 

f rward with production.

requests

 for product o

of  

docume s

Please pr duce 

the

 following:

1.  

F r 

each 

request

 

for admissi n

 

that

 y u

 denied, pr vide 

all

 d cuments that

 

tend to

 

supp rt y ur  denial.

 ESPO SE:

2.

 

The

 

internal 

auditing 

control

 

rep rt

 prepared 

by Simps n Huggins and

 

transmitted

 

by email fr m Bryan  Licht to  raig

 

Richm nd, Dan  Lewis, 

Al

 

nners,

 Adel 

Torres, 

and Brendan  

Patters n

 at appr ximately

 

1:00 p.m.  n 

December 

15,

 2015.

 ESPO SE:

3.  Rec rds Simps n 

Huggins

 relied on, reviewed,

 

or referenced to prepare 

the

 

internal 

auditing 

control

 rep rt

 referenced in

 

Request

 N .

 2 above.

 ESPO SE:

4.

  Rec rds

 confiscated fr m Simps n Huggins  by Deb  Wa man (Vice President

 

of H man

 Res urces)

 yesterday 

during 

the meeting

 where 

he

 was

 put

  n 

unpaid 

administrative

 leave 

including 

the 

following:

a.

  ntents

 

of 

Simps n

 Huggins

s flash drive (a

 

silver 

Sandisk

 attached 

to his  lanyard  with his  hospital ID);

Page 4 

of 

10

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 28/33

b.  Rep rts

 

for  

audit

 c mmittee,

 

rep rt for finance c mmittee,

 

rep rt that 

RMS (external auditors) gave, c mpliance department  update; and  

HI AA privacy update.

 ESPO SE:

5.  Rec rds

 

regarding  

the 

theft

 

of

 B t x and/ r services 

relating 

to 

B t x 

injections

 (or  ther injectables) pr vided with ut charge to Metr Health

 

empl yees 

or relatives

 of  

Metr Health

 empl yees (patient-identifying

 

inf rmati n  ay

 

be redacted;

 

dates of

 

service, pr viding physician, and  

location 

are

 

n t

 exempted and must  be  

made

 available).

 ESPO SE:

6.

 

Rec rds

 

regarding

 

trips

 

taken

 

by

 

Dr.

 

Akram

 

B utr s

 

and/ r

 

his

 

wife

 

that

 

were funded by Metr Health or the Metr Health F undati n (including trips 

to

 Venice,

 L nd n, New

 

Y rk, and

 

Abu  

Dhabi).

 ESPO SE:

7.

  Rec rds

 

regarding

 any expenditures by  

Metr Health

  n Dr. 

B utr s

s

 

behalf 

related 

to

 his

 New

 

Y rk

 

medical

 license (including 

expenses 

for m nthly trips 

to New

 Y rk

 to meet the 

requirements

 to maintain  

his

 out-of-state 

medical 

license).

 ESPO SE:

8.

  Rec rds

 

regarding

 any  ther expenditures by  

Metr Health

  n Dr. B utr s’s

 

behalf.

 ESPO SE:

9.  Rec rds

 

regarding  misuse  of

 

Metr Health credit cards by  Metr Health  

empl yees fr m July 2013-the 

present.

 ESPO SE:

10.

 

Rec rds

 

regarding

 

failure

 

to

 

follow

 

Metr Health

 

pr cedures

 

regarding

 

payment  of credit-card

 bills

 with ut pr per

 

receipts 

or

 

d cumentati n  

that

 

the expenditures were appr priate fr m July 2013-the present.

 ESPO SE:

11.  Rec rds regarding 

the

 Audit  mmittee 

meeting

 held yesterday at n n  

including n tes 

taken

 by  any participant.

 ESPO SE:

Page 5 

of 

10

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 29/33

12.  Rec rds

 

regarding 

the 

decision  to curtail

 Simps n

 Huggins

’s 

email or  

c mputer access and the implementati n of that decision (including all 

c mmunicati ns

 

such as  

emails 

or 

text 

messages).

 ESPO SE:

13.  Rec rds

 

regarding 

the 

decision  

to 

exclude

 

Simps n

 

Huggins

 

fr m

 

the

 

Finance 

mmittee

 meeting that 

immediately

 f ll wed 

yesterday

’s Audit  mmittee

 

meeting (including 

all

 c mmunicati ns

 such

 

as

 emails 

or text

 messages).

 ESPO SE:

14.  The  entire 

c ntents

 

of 

Simps n Huggins ’s 

Metr Health

 

“ 

drive.”

 ESPO SE:

15.  Simps n Huggins ’s

 

emails (current and archived)

 

fr m July 2013 to the 

present

 including emails between or am ng  Mr. Huggins  and 

each

 of the 

following:

a.

 

General 

unsel

 Michael Phillips;

b.  Vice President 

of

  linical Integrated

 Operati ns

 Dean  

R berts n;

c.  

Executive Direct r/ hairman Dermat l gy Abel Torres;

d.

 

Audit

 

mmittee

 

hairman

 

J.B.

 

Silvers;

e.   f rmer 

Audit 

mmittee

 

hairman  R n  F untain;

f.  Seni r

 

Vice President and 

hief 

Financial 

Officer

  raig Richm nd; and

g.

 

Ass ciate General 

unsel

 S nja Rajki.

 ESPO SE:

16.  Any  internal audit charter applicable to Simps n Huggins  w rk  

at

 

Metr Health.

 ESPO SE:

17.  J b description for Director,

 

Internal Audit.

 ESPO SE:

Page 6 

of 

10

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 30/33

18.  G vernance  rules

 

and regulati ns

 

regarding 

the

 

functions

 of

 

the

 

B ard of 

Trustees.

 ESPO SE:

19.  Finalized

 

Internal 

Audit

 

reports

 and

 

management  

plans 

fr m January 2012  

to 

the

 present.

 ESPO SE:

20.

 

All empl yee 

expense

 files 

submitted

 to 

Simps n  

Huggins by

 

A a da Gibs n

 

(Director,  Acc unting for  Disbursements)  and/ r 

David

  rt  (Staff 

Acc untant) fr m 2012-2015 for Financial Rep rting  ntr ls testing.

 ESPO SE:

21.   Daily visit summaries for Pepper  Pike Dermat l gy  linic fr m 2013-the 

present.

 ESPO SE:

22.  

Listing

 and  schedule of residents for Pepper Pike Dermat l gy  linic fr m  

2013-the present.

 ESPO SE:

23.

 

All

 

rec rds

 

regarding

 

the

 

decision

 

to

 

place

 

Simps n

 

Huggins

 

n

 

unpaid

 

administrative

 leave (including all c mmunicati ns such as  emails 

or

 

text

 

messages).

 ESPO SE:

24.   Dr. Akram  B utr s’s c mpensati n contracts (including any drafts).

 ESPO SE:

25.   Dr. Akram  B utr s

’s 

empl yment contracts

 

(including any drafts).

 ESPO SE:

26.  

Empl yee

 expense 

reimbursements

 for Akram  B utr s.

 ESPO SE:

27.

  Rel cati n

 expenses paid

 

by

 Metr Health 

for

 

Akram  

B utr s (both

 m ves).

 ESPO SE:

Page

 7

 

of 

10

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 31/33

28.   Rec rds

 

regarding  any  policies

 

n empl yee 

use

 of  Metr Health credit 

cards.

 ESPO SE:

29.  

Simps n

 Huggins ’s pers nnel rec rds including his  pers nnel file 

and

 

any

 

rec rds 

that 

w uld

 typically

 

be  kept 

in

 a 

pers nnel

 file (whether  Metr keeps 

such 

rec rds in 

an

 empl yee ’

s

 pers nnel 

file

 

or

 

not).

 ESPO SE:

30.

 

Pers nnel rec rds including pers nnel

 files

 and 

any

 rec rds that w uld

 

typically

 be  kept in a 

pers nnel

 file

 

(whether Metr keeps

 

such 

rec rds 

in 

an

 

empl yee ’s pers nnel file or not) 

for

 any 

empl yee

 placed  n paid 

or

 unpaid  

administrative leave fr m January 2012 to the present.

 ESPO SE:

31.  All credit-card statements fr m 

N

related to c rp rate 

cards

 for all 

appr ved Metr Health empl yees (fr m July 2013-December 2014).

 ESPO SE:

32.

  Rec rds regarding  

discipline

 

of

 

any

 empl yee for failing to c mply  with 

Metr Health

 policies regarding

 

credit-card

 

use.

 ESPO SE:

33. 

Rec rds

 regarding  discipline of

 

any empl yee 

for

 theft of

 

B t x 

or

  ther 

injectables.

 ESPO SE:

34. 

Rec rds

 regarding  payment  for legal services 

related

 to Simps n Huggins  

including

 but  

n t

 limited 

to

 

the 

decision to place him   n unpaid  

administrative

 leave.

 ESPO SE:

35.  The  c mpetitive sealed pr p sal that created the three-year  service contract 

between

 Metr Health

 

and 

the

 Advis ry 

B ard 

mpany.

 ESPO SE:

36.

  All

 contracts 

and

 

amendments

 between  

Metr Health

 and the

 Advis ry

 B ard

 

mpany

 fr m

 

2013-the present.

 ESPO SE:

Page 8

 of 

10

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 32/33

37.

  Rec rds sent to 

the

 Ohi Att rney General

’s 

office regarding

 

delegating 

signat ry auth rity fr m Akram  B utr s to Walter Jones, Seni r Vice 

President,

  ampus

 

Transf rmati n.

 ESPO SE:

38.

  All

 contracts 

signed 

by

 

Walter 

J nes

 

fr m

 

Oct ber

 

1,  

2014 to 

Oct ber

 

31,

2015.

 ESPO SE:

39.

  Rec rds

 

fr m 

the

 Laws n

 system

 

listing

 all

 direct

 

reports

 to

  raig

 Richm nd  

(including

 race, job  pay grade, annual 

salary

 (excluding

 

benefits),

 

and 

annual

 

perf rmance bonus).

 ESPO SE:

40. 

Rec rds

 fr m the Laws n  system listing 

all

 Metr Health empl yees 

with

 

pay

 

grade

 

36  (including race, job  pay grade, annual

 salary

 (excluding benefits), 

and annual  perf rmance bonus).

 ESPO SE:

41.

 

de of

 

nduct Statements for 

2013-2015

 

for 

Akram  B utr s, Mary

 Weir- 

B ylan, Elizabeth Allen,

 

and  Michael

 

Phillips.

 ESPO SE:

42.

 

onflict of 

Interest

 Statements 

for

 2013-2015 for

 Akram

 B utr s, Mary

 Weir- 

B ylan,

 Elizabeth

 Allen, and  Michael Phillips.

 ESPO SE:

43.

 

Ethics

 Statements for 2013-2015 

for

 Akram B utr s, 

Mary

 

Weir-B ylan,

 

Elizabeth Allen, and Michael  Phillips.

 ESPO SE:

44.  Rec rds of any  reports submitted to the Ohi Ethics  mmissi n  

regarding

 

receipt

 of free 

B t x 

injections

 

by

 any  Metr Health

 empl yee

 

or

 

relative 

of

 

Metr Health

 

empl yee.

 ESPO SE:

Page 9 

of 

10

Electr nically

 

Filed 12/21/2015 10:51 / /  V  15

 

856035  onfirmation Nbr. 624362  LMKO

8/20/2019 Complaint and Discovery Requests

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/complaint-and-discovery-requests 33/33

December 21, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

  Subodh

 

Chandra

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Sub dh

  handra

 

(0069233)

Ashlie

  ase 

Sletvold

 (0079477)

 

Harris n Blythe 

(00093851)

THE

 

HANDRA 

W

 FIRM,

 

LL

1265 W. 6th  St., Suite 400 

leveland, OH

 

44113-1326  

216.578.1700 

Ph ne  

216.578.1800 

Fax

Sub dh. handra@ handraLaw.c m

Ashlie.Sletv ld@ handraLaw.c m

Harris n.Blythe@ handraLaw.c m

Coun el for

 

Plaintiff

 Simp on 

Huggin

III

 ertificate 

of   ervice

I

 certify that 

the

 ab ve

 

disc very requests were

 

submitted to 

the 

lerk

s Office to be  

served 

with

 the Summ ns and  mplaint.

 

bodh

 

Chandra_ _ _ _ _ _ _

One of the attorney for 

Plaintiff

 Simp on Huggin III