Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental...

27
Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics

Transcript of Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental...

Page 1: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use

Shawel Betru International Environmental

Economics

Page 2: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

India

Page 3: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Agricultural in India

• Indian agricultural policy has dramatically changed before and after 1947 independence – Focus from export crops to food crops – Food security has guided overall policy – High government involvement

• New Agricultural Strategy: – Chemical fertilizer– high yielding variety– Irrigation

Page 4: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Overview of fertilizer policy, India

Period Policy

1957 Fertilizer control order (distribution and price)

Before 1970 Price control for Nitrogen fertilizer

Oct 1970 Review of fertilizer policy Common fertilizer pool

1973 Reintroduction of distribution control (Essential commodity act (ESA)), fertilizer movement control order)

1974 Fertilizer pool equalization charge (FPEC)

Jan. 1976 High Power Fertilizer Prices committee

1977 Review of price control

Retention price scheme for nitrogenous fertilizers

1987-88 Free allocation of specific quantity of fertilizers for Rabi (spring) and Kharif (autumn)

1988 Revision of price control

1991 Price decontrol for low analysis nitrogen fertilizers

Sept 1992 Import liberalization for raw materials

1994 Decontrol price increase, price of urea increased

Page 5: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Nitrogen fertilizer growth

19611965

19691973

19771981

19851989

19931997

20012005

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

16,000,000

consumptionproduction

Nitr

ogen

ferti

lizer

(Mill

ion

t)

Page 6: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Increasing production of fertilizer

• Caused by – Commissioning of new gas based plants in 1980s– Increasing capacity utilization 60% in 1970 to 90%

in 1990s • Most of nitrogen fertilizer production is

controlled by public sector – Lower capacity utilization

Page 7: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Present trends

• Decreasing and abandoning fertilizer subsidy • Changing feedstock from naphtha and coal to

LNG• Joint venture aboard: Senegal, Jordan, Iran

and Oman

Page 8: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Ethiopia

Page 9: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Fertilizer policy, Ethiopia

• The first comprehensive fertilizer policy was introduced in 1993 by TGE (transitional government)

• Between 1985-1993 the parastatal corporation called AISCO completely and officially controlled fertilizer sector

• 1993- fertilizer subsidy was introduced – Meant to offset effect of currency devaluation– Subsidy did not exceed 25% of unsubsidized price

• 1997-1998- price decontrol was made

Page 10: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Fertilizer production and import

• There is no production of inorganic chemical fertilizers in Ethiopia

• In 1993 the government and WB intended to establish fertilizer factory

• but there is no fertilizer factory in Ethiopia and therefore, all inorganic fertilizers.

Page 11: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Cereal yield growth, Ethiopia

19931995

19971999

20012003

20052007

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

BarleyTeffMaizeMilletOatsRice, paddySorghumWheat

Cere

al y

ield

(t/h

a)

Page 12: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Harvesting land

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

3500000

BarleyTeffMaizeMilletOatsRice, paddySorghumWheat

Har

vest

ing

lan

d (

mil

lion

ha)

Page 13: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Import and marketing

• Fertilizer import in Ethiopia is controlled by parastatal companies

AISCO

Dinsho (oromia) Wondo ( South )Ambasel (Amhara) Guna ( Tigray)

YARA

DA DA DA DA DA DA DA DA DA DA DA DA DA

Page 14: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Import and marketing

• Regional governments guarantee development banks on fertilizers credit

• The development agents are responsible for collection of credits

• Availability of credit is mostly politicized especially during elections

Page 15: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Import and marketing

• Inaccessibility of farming areas and absence of sea port increased price and decreased use

• Possibility of increasing arable land discouraged fertilizer use

• In the past price of crops were controlled by the government which disfavor farmers

• Ineffective extension system that depend of propaganda than actual profitability

Page 16: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Policy objectives failures

• The number of people with chronic food shortage has increased to more than 5 million

• There are no private companies in any form • No significant progress in establishing fertilizer

factory

Page 17: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Comparison Variables India Ethiopia

Occurrences of famine Six , (since 1880s to 1943)

Three (1890s, 1974 and 1984)

Population >1 billion 80 million

Average cereal yield 2.5 t/ha 1.6 t/ha

Fertilizer use (2005) 129kg/ha 10kg/ha

Total fertility rate (2005) 2.6 5.3

Fertilizer production More that 60 No

Ethnic politics (north-south divide) Implicit Explicitly since 1991

Page 18: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Cereal yield growth

19611965

19691973

19771981

19851989

19931997

20012005

0

1000

2000

3000

IndiaEthiopia

Cere

al y

ield

(tha

)

Page 19: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Fertilizer consumption

-1000000

2000000

5000000

8000000

11000000

14000000

17000000

20000000

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

India

Ethiopia

Tot

al f

erti

lize

r (m

ill t

, In

dia

)

Tot

al f

erti

lize

r (1

00 t

hou

san

d t

, E

thio

pia

)

Page 20: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Arable land

1961

1965

1969

1973

1977

1981

1985

1989

1993

1997

2001

2005

0

5

10

Ethiopia

India

Ara

ble

lan

d (

per

son

/ha)

Page 21: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Similarities Differences High rate of poverty (44% Eth, 26% Ind) Dynamic fertilizer sector policy Dependence on central planning in Agri Major role of private sector High rate of initial population growth Well developed fertilizer industries North south divide 30 times higher road network Central planning is prevalent Lower per capita external aid Comparably high GINI coefficient Agriculture contribution to GDP is lesser Favored high potential areas Superior irrigation system and available

water (TRWR= 40 times bigger)

Page 22: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Conclusion • India has room for improvement in fertilizer

production and use– Policy change is obstructed by interest groups

• Need institutional stability

• Ethiopia has the potential to initiate production of nitrogen fertilizer and increase use– Encouraging private companies involvement– Better market environment – Efficient use of extension agents

Page 23: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Next plan

• Prospect of fertilizer supply in India • Policy changes required in fertilizer sector • Potential of establishing Ethiopian fertilizer

industry

Page 24: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.
Page 25: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Cereal yield

19611967

19731979

19851991

19972003

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

Barley

Maize

Millet

Rice, paddy

Sorghum

Wheat

Yiel

d (t

/ha)

Page 26: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Harvested area

19611970

19791988

19972006

05000000

100000001500000020000000250000003000000035000000400000004500000050000000

Barley

Maize

Millet

Rice, paddy

Sorghum

WheatHar

vest

ed a

rea

(mill

ion

ha)

Page 27: Comparison between India and Ethiopian fertilizer use Shawel Betru International Environmental Economics.

Cereal yield

19611967

19731979

19851991

19972003

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

Barley

Maize

Millet

Rice, paddy

Sorghum

Wheat

Yiel

d (t

/ha)