Clinical presentation & outcomes of stent thrombosis Spanish registry ESTROFA (n=23,500)

5
Clinical presentation & outcomes of stent thrombosis Spanish registry ESTROFA (n=23,500) J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:986–90 13.1% 18.8% 16% Death 3.3% 8.87.6 n=133 0.66% 9.8% 84.2% 20.4% 81.5% Late (n=152) n=128 n=216 Follow-up 1511 11.810 Time, mo 2.7% 1.66% Thrombosis In-hospital 13% 11.6% Death Presentatio n 0.36 86% 83.7% STEMI 0.98 21% 20.5% Shock 0.056 92% 88% TIMI 0/1 Outcomes 6% 4.6% Thrombosis p Acute/ Subacute (n=149) Overall (n=301)

description

Clinical presentation & outcomes of stent thrombosis Spanish registry ESTROFA (n=23,500). Overall (n=301). Acute/Subacute (n=149). Late (n=152). p. Presentation. STEMI. 83.7%. 86%. 81.5%. 0.36. Shock. 20.5%. 21%. 20.4%. 0.98. TIMI 0/1. 88%. 92%. 84.2%. 0.056. Outcomes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Clinical presentation & outcomes of stent thrombosis Spanish registry ESTROFA (n=23,500)

Page 1: Clinical presentation & outcomes  of stent thrombosis Spanish registry ESTROFA (n=23,500)

Clinical presentation & outcomes of stent thrombosis

Spanish registry ESTROFA (n=23,500)

J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:986–90

13.1%18.8%16%Death3.3%

8.87.6n=1330.66%9.8%

84.2%20.4%81.5%

Late(n=152)

n=128n=216Follow-up 151111.810Time, mo

2.7%1.66%Thrombosis

In-hospital 13%11.6%Death

Presentation 0.3686%83.7%STEMI0.9821%20.5%Shock

0.05692%88%TIMI 0/1Outcomes

6%4.6%Thrombosis

pAcute/Subacute(n=149)

Overall (n=301)

Page 2: Clinical presentation & outcomes  of stent thrombosis Spanish registry ESTROFA (n=23,500)

DECREASE Study Design

The patients undergoing successful DES implantation

Triple group (n=1443)

Operator decisions for adding cilostazol

Clinical follow-up at 12 months (Death, MI, or stent thrombosis)

Dual group (n=1656)

Propensity score matching (965 pairs)

Triple antiplatelet group (n=965) Dual antiplatelet group (n=965)

Inverse-Probability-of-Treatment-Weighted (IPTW) for the Entire cohort

Page 3: Clinical presentation & outcomes  of stent thrombosis Spanish registry ESTROFA (n=23,500)

Study endpoint

• Death• Myocardial infarction • Stent thrombosis (definite and probable by

ARC)

12-month clinical outcomes

Primary endpoint

Secondary endpoint

• Death or Myocardial infarction• TIMI Major bleeding• TIMI minor bleeding

Page 4: Clinical presentation & outcomes  of stent thrombosis Spanish registry ESTROFA (n=23,500)

0.82671.045 (0.703-1.555)0.75041.062 (0.734-1.537)0.81251.039 (0.757-1.426)Minor bleeding

0.27810.683 (0.343-1.360)0.93720.969 (0.443-2.119)0.58300.850 (0.477-1.516)Major bleeding

Bleeding

0.08110.556 (0.287-1.075)0.06650.591 (0.3364-1.037)0.28170.761 (0.464-1.251)Death/MI

0.04960.124 (0.016-0.996)0.00360.136 (0.035-0.521)0.05240.286 (0.081-1.013)Stent thrombosis

0.06650.298 (0.082-1.086)0.00970.233 (0.077-0.703)0.06170.381 (0.138-1.048)MI

0.25840.644(0.300-1.381)0.40620.762 (0.401-1.448)0.79070.925 (0.521 -1.644)Death

Cardiac events

P Value

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

P Value

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

P Value

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

Variables Propensity-matched (965 pairs)

Inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted

Crude

Twelve-month risk of Events after DES Implantation of Triple versus Dual antiplatelet therapy according to analytic methods

Hazard ratios are for the triple group, as compared with the dual group.

Page 5: Clinical presentation & outcomes  of stent thrombosis Spanish registry ESTROFA (n=23,500)

0.4711 3.611 0.062 0.474 Death/ Myocardial infarction

NAStent thrombosis

NAMI

0.7441 5.570 0.090 0.709 Death

p-value95%CIHROutcome

Triple therapy beyond 6 month, Triple therapy (n=253) vs. Dual therapy (n=1631)

0.6645 2.704 0.210 0.754 Death/ Myocardial infarction

NANANANAStent thrombosis

0.5841 4.615 0.066 0.553 MI

0.8116 3.776 0.183 0.832 Death

p-value95%CIHROutcome

Triple therapy beyond 3 month, Triple therapy (n=394) vs. Dual therapy (n=1638)

0.8262 1.758 0.493 0.931 Death/ Myocardial infarction

0.0415 0.918 0.013 0.108 Stent thrombosis

0.1295 1.365 0.088 0.346 Myocardial infarction

0.6238 2.403 0.591 1.192 Death

p-value95%CIHROutcome

Triple therapy beyond 1 month, Triple therapy (n=974) vs. Dual therapy (n=1646)

Adjusted Landmark Analysis using IPTW in patients without events at landmark months