Toulmin Examples

Claims are debatable or controversial statementsassertions you hope to prove

Evidence and Reasons Claim

A claim answers the question ldquowhat should we dordquo

1048707A surprisingly large number of arguments donrsquot have claims ldquoThe President is dumbrdquo ldquoOur taxes are too highrdquo or ldquoThe war is immoralrdquo are all examples of arguments without claims

Warrant answers the question How do I get from the claim to the data

ReasonsSo Claim

Since Warrant

Warrants are the unstated (or stated) assumptions or agreements you can rely on your audience making in order to believe your reasons

Warrants support reasonsThey can be oversimplified to ___________ is

good OR ___________ is bad

ExampleVending machines should be removed from

campus because they promote unhealthy eating habits and cause classroom distractions

Warrant 1= Unhealthy eating habits hurt students

Warrant 2= Classroom distractions are undesirable

ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because

traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased

Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their

religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-

religious expression is a right)

ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high

school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams

Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are

important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor

Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them

The mushroom is poisonous So do not

eat it

Since eating poisonous things is dangerous

More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well

So the federal government should ban smoking

Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others

More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems

So the legal age for drinking should be lowered

What works for me should work for everyone else

BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to

prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable

Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways

Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

Claims are debatable or controversial statementsassertions you hope to prove

Evidence and Reasons Claim

A claim answers the question ldquowhat should we dordquo

1048707A surprisingly large number of arguments donrsquot have claims ldquoThe President is dumbrdquo ldquoOur taxes are too highrdquo or ldquoThe war is immoralrdquo are all examples of arguments without claims

Warrant answers the question How do I get from the claim to the data

ReasonsSo Claim

Since Warrant

Warrants are the unstated (or stated) assumptions or agreements you can rely on your audience making in order to believe your reasons

Warrants support reasonsThey can be oversimplified to ___________ is

good OR ___________ is bad

ExampleVending machines should be removed from

campus because they promote unhealthy eating habits and cause classroom distractions

Warrant 1= Unhealthy eating habits hurt students

Warrant 2= Classroom distractions are undesirable

ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because

traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased

Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their

religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-

religious expression is a right)

ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high

school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams

Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are

important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor

Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them

The mushroom is poisonous So do not

eat it

Since eating poisonous things is dangerous

More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well

So the federal government should ban smoking

Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others

More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems

So the legal age for drinking should be lowered

What works for me should work for everyone else

BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to

prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable

Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways

Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

A claim answers the question ldquowhat should we dordquo

1048707A surprisingly large number of arguments donrsquot have claims ldquoThe President is dumbrdquo ldquoOur taxes are too highrdquo or ldquoThe war is immoralrdquo are all examples of arguments without claims

Warrant answers the question How do I get from the claim to the data

ReasonsSo Claim

Since Warrant

Warrants are the unstated (or stated) assumptions or agreements you can rely on your audience making in order to believe your reasons

Warrants support reasonsThey can be oversimplified to ___________ is

good OR ___________ is bad

ExampleVending machines should be removed from

campus because they promote unhealthy eating habits and cause classroom distractions

Warrant 1= Unhealthy eating habits hurt students

Warrant 2= Classroom distractions are undesirable

ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because

traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased

Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their

religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-

religious expression is a right)

ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high

school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams

Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are

important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor

Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them

The mushroom is poisonous So do not

eat it

Since eating poisonous things is dangerous

More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well

So the federal government should ban smoking

Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others

More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems

So the legal age for drinking should be lowered

What works for me should work for everyone else

BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to

prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable

Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways

Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

Warrant answers the question How do I get from the claim to the data

ReasonsSo Claim

Since Warrant

Warrants are the unstated (or stated) assumptions or agreements you can rely on your audience making in order to believe your reasons

Warrants support reasonsThey can be oversimplified to ___________ is

good OR ___________ is bad

ExampleVending machines should be removed from

campus because they promote unhealthy eating habits and cause classroom distractions

Warrant 1= Unhealthy eating habits hurt students

Warrant 2= Classroom distractions are undesirable

ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because

traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased

Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their

religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-

religious expression is a right)

ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high

school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams

Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are

important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor

Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them

The mushroom is poisonous So do not

eat it

Since eating poisonous things is dangerous

More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well

So the federal government should ban smoking

Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others

More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems

So the legal age for drinking should be lowered

What works for me should work for everyone else

BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to

prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable

Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways

Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

Warrants are the unstated (or stated) assumptions or agreements you can rely on your audience making in order to believe your reasons

Warrants support reasonsThey can be oversimplified to ___________ is

good OR ___________ is bad

ExampleVending machines should be removed from

campus because they promote unhealthy eating habits and cause classroom distractions

Warrant 1= Unhealthy eating habits hurt students

Warrant 2= Classroom distractions are undesirable

ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because

traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased

Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their

religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-

religious expression is a right)

ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high

school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams

Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are

important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor

Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them

The mushroom is poisonous So do not

eat it

Since eating poisonous things is dangerous

More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well

So the federal government should ban smoking

Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others

More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems

So the legal age for drinking should be lowered

What works for me should work for everyone else

BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to

prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable

Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways

Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

ExampleVending machines should be removed from

campus because they promote unhealthy eating habits and cause classroom distractions

Warrant 1= Unhealthy eating habits hurt students

Warrant 2= Classroom distractions are undesirable

ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because

traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased

Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their

religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-

religious expression is a right)

ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high

school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams

Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are

important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor

Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them

The mushroom is poisonous So do not

eat it

Since eating poisonous things is dangerous

More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well

So the federal government should ban smoking

Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others

More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems

So the legal age for drinking should be lowered

What works for me should work for everyone else

BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to

prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable

Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways

Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because

traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased

Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their

religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-

religious expression is a right)

ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high

school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams

Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are

important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor

Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them

The mushroom is poisonous So do not

eat it

Since eating poisonous things is dangerous

More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well

So the federal government should ban smoking

Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others

More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems

So the legal age for drinking should be lowered

What works for me should work for everyone else

BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to

prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable

Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways

Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high

school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams

Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are

important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor

Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them

The mushroom is poisonous So do not

eat it

Since eating poisonous things is dangerous

More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well

So the federal government should ban smoking

Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others

More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems

So the legal age for drinking should be lowered

What works for me should work for everyone else

BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to

prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable

Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways

Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them

The mushroom is poisonous So do not

eat it

Since eating poisonous things is dangerous

More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well

So the federal government should ban smoking

Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others

More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems

So the legal age for drinking should be lowered

What works for me should work for everyone else

BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to

prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable

Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways

Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well

So the federal government should ban smoking

Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others

More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems

So the legal age for drinking should be lowered

What works for me should work for everyone else

BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to

prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable

Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways

Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems

So the legal age for drinking should be lowered

What works for me should work for everyone else

BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to

prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable

Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways

Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to

prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable

Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways

Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing

NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal

What unifies the nation should be a national priority

On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)

In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)

In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

Fill in the blanks

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs

A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

Fill in the blanks

In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do

(Emotional appeal)

(Ethical appeal)

(Logical appeal as evidence)

Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely

MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the

arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the

military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally

obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing

argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to

build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent

to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-

smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the

general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others

Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health

Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can

smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should

be left to the individual states

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage

Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the

passage

• Toulmin Examples
• Slide 2
• Slide 3
• Slide 4
• Slide 5
• Example
• Examples
• Examples (2)
• Slide 9
• More examples
• More examples (2)
• Backing
• More examples (3)
• Fill in the blanks
• Fill in the blanks (2)
• Using Qualifiers
• Conditions of Rebuttal
• Concession
• Outline of the Toulmin Model
• Slide 20
• Now read an example passage