Dynamical, Spatial and Chemical Properties of h Carinae’s Heavy Metal (i.e., Sr) Filaments:
CHAPTER 3 Spatial analysis of physical and chemical...
Transcript of CHAPTER 3 Spatial analysis of physical and chemical...
62
CHAPTER 3
Spatial analysis of physical and chemical properties of soil
3.1. Introduction
Soil is non-consolidated upper part of the earth’s crust that serves as a natural
medium for growth of plants (Gardiner and Miller, 2008). It is the dynamic and unique gift of
nature that acquires the properties in accordance with forces acting upon it and within itself.
It is a complete physical and biological system providing support, nutrients, water and
oxygen to plants. It sustains the growth of many plants and animals. Rapid industrialization
during recent years has threatened the soil environment through consequences of pollution
(Jeeva and Kiruba, 2010). Soils are considered highly heterogeneous in both space and time,
and this heterogeneity has strong consequences on plant performance and on ecosystem
function (Huber-Sannwald and Jackson, 2001). Spatial studies of soil help to describe soil
properties of a landscape, which is a function of vegetation and other ambient factors
(Maestre and Reynolds, 2006).
Human have been using the soil for food production since 11,000 years ago
(Lenne and Wood, 2011). Soil provides a reservoir of nutrients required by crops and also
therefore for animals but not necessarily at optimum levels of immediate availability to plants
(Petrone et al., 2004). Land use change is a significant problem in wetland ecosystems of
India. There are 200 hectare, dried wetlands in India, but most of the dried wetlands didn’t
become fertile as expected and the territory became infertile because of salinity and wind
erosion (Timur, 2008). Bationo et al., (2006) highlighted inherently low fertility status,
inappropriate land use, poor management, erosion and salinization of riverine wetland, water
irrigation strategy, soil type, ground water quality and depth on salinization of soils.
63
Ali et al., (2001) investigated the effects of quality of irrigation water,
irrigation strategy, soil type, ground water quality and depth on salinization of soils. High soil
salinity and alkalinity restricts plants growth by reducing the somatic potential, decreasing
nutrient availability and soil physical quality parameters. Richards et al., (1986) reported
soluble salts affect productivity of soils in two principal ways: changing the osmotic potential
of soil solution and increasing the content of exchangeable sodium.
Alkaline soils are characterized by exchangeable sodium contents and sodium
attached to clay surfaces can increase clay dispersion. Dispersion of clay particles can restrict
air and water transport in soil profile and could promote soil erosion and total loss of soil
(Dougherty and Anderson, 2001). In addition to the natural weathering-pedological
(geogenic) inputs under terrestrial settings, anthropogenic activities, such as the mining and
smelting industries, sewage sludge application and the use of mineral fertilizers are said to be
significantly responsible for elevated micro and macro nutrient concentrations in soils
(Mapanda et al., 2005).
Soil degradation and nutrient depletion have gradually increased and have
become serious threats to wetland productivity (Vanlauwe et al., 2002). Smaling (1995)
described tropical soils are often having negative soil nutrient balances. A major factor in soil
degradation is the soil chemical fertility and then in particular its decline as a result of the
lack of nutrient inputs (Hartemink, 2010). However, not much work has been done on micro
and macro nutrient contamination, source identification and their spatial distribution in
wetland soils of India.
Pollutant activities can have implications for the quality of wetland soils,
including phytotoxicity at high concentrations and the transfer of heavy metals to the human
64
diet from plant uptake or soil ingestion by grazing livestock (Li et al., 2009). The continuous
and over application of these agrochemicals may enrich the riverine soil with micro and
macro nutrients.
The purpose of soil analysis is to assess the adequacy, surplus or deficiency of
available nutrients for crop growth and to monitor change brought about by farming
practices. This information is needed for optimum production, to avoid transferring
undesirable levels of some nutrients into the environment and to ensure a suitable nutrient
content in crop products (Tariq et al., 2007). Farm assurance schemes, buyer's protocols and
codes of practice are increasingly demanding more accurate fertilizer recommendations
which must depend on the nutrient-supplying capacity of the soil. Regular soil analysis, every
3-5 years, should be undertaken as a vital part of good management practice. In the present
study, a detailed investigation has been made to identify the hydro geochemical processes and
their relation with soil quality, hydro chemical evolution of soil system through principal
component analysis and seasonal variation in the soil quality.
Soil salinizations are a widespread limitation to agricultural production in dry
land and irrigated soils throughout the world. Soil salinity reduces crop growth because
depression of the osmotic potential of the soil solution limits water uptake by the plant
(Corwin and Lesch, 2003). Salinity may also cause specific ion toxicity or nutrient
imbalances, and soil permeability may deteriorate if excessive amounts of sodium accumulate
on the soil’s cat ion-exchange complex.
The sanitization of soils is harmful to the production potential of soils, causing
sharp reduction in crop yields and changing the adaptability of land cropping; furthermore,
the accumulation of salt will also change the environment of plant growth and cause the
65
vegetative degradation (Chen et al., 2011). Understanding the soil salinization degree and
characteristics will help to improve and recover the ecological environment. Especially in the
arid desert areas, the soil micro and macro nutrient content determines the direction of
ecological evolution. Understanding the soil micro and macro nutrients variation has a very
important role in improving the stalinized soils (Dalal et al., 2011).
Reclamation of saline, alkaline, and saline-alkaline soils require two
measurements, leaching a soluble salt with the quality water and removing exchangeable
sodium via gypsum application. But salinity and alkalinity can show very complex spatial
variability in a site where different application of water and gypsum are required. Therefore,
seasonal variation of salinity and alkalinity can be determined using geostatistical methods
and also results of management practices can be monitored. The effective management of
saline-alkaline soils requires understanding of not only the salinity sodicity continuum, but
also of its spatial variation (Inakwu et al., 2008). Soil properties show spatial variation with
intrinsic and extrinsic soil forming factors (Heuvelink and Webster, 2001).
Soil scientists focused on predicting spatial variability of soil properties using
geostatistics and different kriging methods over small to large spatial scale (Bo et al., 2003).
Samra et al., (1988) investigated seasonal variability in sodic soils. Cemek et al., (2007)
investigated seasonal variability of some soil properties as related to salinity and alkalinity.
They inferred that the strong spatial dependency of soil properties may have resulted from
extrinsic factors such as ground water level, drainage and irrigation systems. Dhillion et al.,
(1994) used pH as an indicator of soil fertility in strategies based on spatial analysis of plant
nutrients.
66
Studies on soil variability has relevance in sampling (Tabi and Ogunkunle,
2007), site specific soil fertility management and definition of land management units and in
explaining variation in crop growth and yield (Kosaki and Juo, 1989). Technologies need to
be adapted to the specific biophysical and a socio-economic circumstance of small-scale
farmers. This is made possible with combined use of classical statistics and multivariate
statistics (principal component).
Principal component analysis (PCA) is a multivariate technique for analyzing
relationship among several quantitative variables measured on a number of objects (Manly,
1997). It provides information about the relative importance of each variable in
characterizing the objects. New variables are calculated, which consist of (usually linear)
combinations of the old ones. A small number of these new variables will usually be
sufficient to describe the observational objects.
The study of the spatial variation of soil texture has an important role in
analyzing and simulating the fluid movement and the material migration process of soil
dissolved matters (Williams et al., 2009), simulating hydrological processes and optimizing
agricultural production activities. The influential factors of spatial variations were also
discussed, which will provide a theoretical base for the protection of water and soil resources
and the management of oases. Saline soil is defined as one containing sufficient soluble salts
to adversely affect the growth of most crop plants (Soil Science Society of America, 2001).
Ali and Malik (2011) reported that the soil quality of rapidly growing
countries of India, during the study of seven physico-chemical parameters and seven micro
and macro nutrients were determined in surface soils. The study was aimed with the
following objectives.
67
3.2. Objectives of the present study:
To analyses the physical characteristics of the soil (pH, electrical conductivity and
soil texture),
To analyses the micro and macro nutrients of the soil,
To investigate and interpret spatial relationship and seasonal variation of physico-
chemical parameters,
To analyses the seasonal variation of the soil using statistical methods (descriptive
statistics, principal component analysis).
3.3. Materials and methods
3.3.1. Study area
The study area (25 wetlands) is located in the command area of Tamiraparani
Riverine wetlands in Srivaikundam, Tuticorin and Tiruchendur Taluks of Tuticorin District.
It is located between 8°20¹ - 9°0¹ North Latitude.
A preliminary survey was conducted the 25 wetlands during June 2011 to May
2012. The physico-chemical features of the study area were assessed by using ground survey.
Samples were taken from each study site and their boundaries were delineated. Soil samples
were taken from three sites in each wetland. A total of 225 samples were analyses for three
seasons (75 samples for each seasons). Based upon the analytical values, the potentials and
constraints of the soils were assessed. The relative nutrient supplying power of the soils were
found out.
3.3.2. Climate
The study area has semi arid tropical monsoonal climate. The mean annual
temperature is 33.5°C and the mean annual precipitation is around 750 mm. The seasonal
distribution of the precipitation shows a concentration of rain in the period from October –
December – i.e., north-east monsoon and post-monsoon showers also pronounced in the area.
68
3.4. Methodology of soil collection
About one kilogram topsoil sample was collected up to a depth of about 0-20
cm, by auger from each representative sample site. The colour and texture of these samples
were noted at the site. These soils samples were properly labeled, stored in kraft papers and
transferred to the Geochemistry Laboratory for further processing and analysis.
3.4.1. Preparation of soil samples
Soil samples were air-dried and organic matters were removed. These were
then sieved through a 2-mm sieve. Each sample was homogenized and then representative
portion was selected by quartering and coning. This portion was then pulverized in a tungsten
carbide ball mill to 200 mesh size. The powered samples were stored in air tight bottles and
were kept in oven at 1100
C for two hours to remove moisture. The samples were cooled by
placing in desiccators.
3.4.2. Determination of physical parameters in soil
pH
pH in the soil samples was determined by using the method of Page et al.,
(1982). About 50 gram of air dry soil was taken in a glass beaker and 100 ml of distilled
water was added. The content was mixed thoroughly by shaken and allowed to stand for one
hour. The pH of saturated soil paste was recorded by using Consort Electrochemical Analyzer
which was calibrated with buffers solution pH 4, 7 and 9.
Electrical conductivity (EC)
Electrical conductivity of soil paste was recorded by using Consort
Electrochemical Analyzer Conductivity meter after standardization with 0.01 N KCl
solutions.
69
Soil texture
The colour and texture of these soil samples were noted at the site.
3.4.3. Determination of major elements in soil samples
Perkin Elmer atomic absorption spectrometer was used for determination of
macro elements (i.e., Na, P and K) in all soil samples. Micro nutrients-zinc, copper, iron and
magnesium were analysis by atomic absorption spectrometer in air acetylene flame mode.
3.4.4. Statistical methods
Analytical results were compiled to form a multi elemental database using
EXCEL and SPSS prior to multivariate analysis.
Descriptive statistics such as minimum, maximum values, mean, Standard
deviation, skewness, kurtosis and coefficient of variation were carried out.
Principal component analysis (PCA),
Seasonal variations of the soil samples.
3.5. Results
Physico chemical properties
Physico-chemical parameters were mainly deal with the colloidal properties of
the soil. PH, electrical conductivity and soil texture for three seasons were shown in tables
3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3 and micro, macro nutrients of the soil for three seasons were shown in
tables 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3. Seasonal variation of the physico-chemical parameters was shown
in the table 3.3.
3.5.1. pH
pH level showed a moderate variation between each seasons with an average
levels of 8.2, 8.3 and 8.1 during south-west monsoon, north-east monsoon season 2011 and
70
post-monsoon season 2012. The maximum pH value 8.2 was observed in site 25 and
minimum pH value of 7.1 was observed in site 6 during south-west monsoon. In north-east
monsoon period, minimum pH value of 6.1 was observed in site 15 and maximum pH value
of 8.3 was observed in site 24. In post-monsoon season the minimum pH value 6.4 was
notified in site 5 and maximum pH value of 8.4 was observed in site 18.
3.5.2. Electrical Conductivity
Electrical conductivity showed high value of variations between each seasons
with an average levels of 0.95 mho/cm, 0.78 mho/cm and 0.98 mho/cm respectively, south-
west monsoon season, north-east monsoon season of 2011 and post-monsoon season of 2012.
The maximum and minimum electrical conductivity was observed during south-west
monsoon season and the values were noted as 0.98 mho/cm in site 25 and 0.18 mho/cm in
site 7. During north-east monsoon period maximum and minimum electrical conductivity was
observed as 0.78 mho/cm (site 25) and 0.10 mho/cm was noted (site 2). In post-monsoon
period minimum electrical conductivity value of 0.08 mho/cm was observed in site 2 and
maximum electrical conductivity value of 0.98 mho/cm was noted in site 25.
3.5.3. Soil texture
Sandy loam soil texture was observed in 19 sites. Clay loam soil texture was
found in 3 sites (site 22, site 23 and site 24). Sandy soil texture was observed in three sites
(site 9, site 10, and site 25). But there was no seasonal variation in soil texture. These
differentiations were due to sedimentation of soil.
3.5.4. Macronutrients
The surface soils were collected from three random places with a quadrat size of
100 m2
at a depth of 22cm. A total of 225 surface soil samples were collected from 25
71
selected Tamiraparani Riverine wetlands for three seasons (south-west monsoon, north-east
monsoon and post-monsoon). The micro and macro nutrients contents of the samples analysis
during south-west monsoon season were shown in table 3.3.1, north-east monsoon was
shown in table 3.3.2 and post-monsoon season were shown in table 3.3.3. Seasonal variations
of micro and macronutrient content in three seasons were shown in table 3.4.
Nitrogen
Nitrogen value showed high level of variations between each season with
average levels of 186 mg/kg, 90 mg/kg and 223 mg/kg respectively, during south-west
monsoon, north-east monsoon during in 2011 and post-monsoon during in 2012. During
south-west monsoon minimum nitrogen value of 24 mg/kg was noted in site 1 and maximum
nitrogen value of 186 mg/kg was noted in site 24. The minimum and maximum nitrogen
content was observed in north-east monsoon in site 3 (10 mg/kg) and in site 20 (90 mg/kg).
During post-monsoon period minimum and maximum nitrogen content was noted in site 1
(27 mg/kg) and in site12 (223 mg/kg).
Phosphorus
Phosphorus level showed slight variations between each season with an
average levels of 68.0.mg/kg, 50.4 mg/kg and 69 mg/kg during south-west monsoon, north-
east monsoon season in 2011 and post-monsoon season in 2012. The maximum and
minimum phosphorus values were observed as 68.0 mg/kg (site 24) and 3.5 mg/kg (site 1)
during south-west monsoon period. The maximum and minimum phosphorus content of 50.3
mg/kg (site 3) and 7.2 (site 21) were observed in north-east monsoon period. The maximum
and minimum phosphorus were noted as 69.0 mg/kg in site 24 and 3 mg/kg in site 3 during
post-monsoon period.
72
Potassium
Potassium level showed variations between each season with an average level
of 510 mg/kg, 240 mg/kg, 256 mg/kg, during south-west monsoon, north-east monsoon
season (2011) and post-monsoon season (2012). The minimum and maximum potassium
value was observed during south-west monsoon period (18 mg/kg) in site 18 and in site 25
(240 mg/kg). The minimum and maximum potassium value was observed during north-east
monsoon period as 29 mg/ kg in site 21 and 150 mg/kg in site 5. The minimum and
maximum potassium value was observed during post-monsoon period as 51 mg/kg in site 3
and 256 mg/kg in site 25.
3.5.5. Micro nutrients
The micronutrients analyses for the present study were zinc, copper, iron and
magnesium
Zinc
Zinc value showed high variations between each seasons with an average
levels of 18.0 mg/kg, 0.92 mg/kg and 8.82 mg/kg during south-west monsoon, north-east
monsoon season (2011) and post-monsoon season (2012). The minimum and maximum zinc
value was observed during south-west monsoon (0.35 mg/kg) in site 7 and in site 18 (18.6
mg/kg). The minimum and maximum zinc level was observed as 0.30 mg/kg (site 13) and
0.92 mg/kg (site 3) during north-east monsoon period. The minimum and maximum zinc
value was observed during post-monsoon period as 0.24 mg/kg in site 22 and 8.82 mg/kg in
site 11.
73
Copper
Copper level showed variations between each seasons with an average level of
12.00 mg/kg, 3.00 mg/kg and 11.88 mg/kg during south-west monsoon, north-east monsoon
season (2011) and post-monsoon season (2012). The minimum and maximum copper value
was observed during south-west monsoon as 0.82 mg/kg in site 6 and 12.00 mg/kg in site
23.The minimum and maximum copper value was observed during north-east monsoon as
0.05 mg/kg in site 16 and 3.00 mg/kg in site 25. The minimum and maximum copper value
was observed during post-monsoon period as 0.79 mg/kg in site 7 and 11.88 mg/kg in site 21.
Iron
Iron level showed level variations between each seasons with an average level
of 14.01 mg/kg, 12.36 mg/kg and 14.20 mg/kg during south-west monsoon, north-east
monsoon season (2011) and post-monsoon season (2012). The minimum and maximum iron
value was observed during south-west monsoon as 0.62 mg/kg in site 23 and 14.01 mg/kg in
site 25. The minimum and maximum iron value was observed during north-east monsoon as
0.70 mg/kg in site 22 and 12.36 mg/kg in site 17. The minimum and maximum iron value
was observed during post-monsoon as 0.62 mg/kg in site 23 and 14.20 mg/kg in site 25.
Magnesium
Magnesium level showed high level variations between each seasons with an
average level of 12.90 mg/kg, 17.21 mg/kg and 14.62 mg/kg during south-west monsoon,
north-east monsoon season (2011) and post-monsoon season (2012).The minimum and
maximum magnesium value was observed during south-west monsoon as 0.99 mg/kg in site
21 and 12.90 mg/kg in site 17. The minimum and maximum magnesium value was observed
during north-east monsoon period as 10.30 mg/kg in site 8 and 17.00 mg/kg in site 25. The
74
minimum and maximum magnesium values were observed during post-monsoon period as
0.99 mg/kg in site 23 and 16.17 mg/kg in site 12.
3.5.6. Descriptive statistics of soil properties
Descriptive statistics of some chemical properties of the soil such as
minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation, coefficient variation, skewness and kurtosis
are given in tables 3.4.1, 3.4.2, 3.4.3. Large differences were found between minimum and
maximum values of the investigated soil samples.
Nitrogen
The minimum and maximum nitrogen level observed during south-west
monsoon period as 25.25 and 225.75.The minimum and maximum nitrogen was observed
during north -east monsoon period as 1.65 and 115. The minimum and maximum nitrogen
was observed during post-monsoon period as 16.25 and 209.5.
Phosphorus
The minimum and maximum phosphorus level was observed during south-
west monsoon period and the values are 3.825 and 116.5. The minimum and maximum
phosphorus level was observed during north-east monsoon period and the values are 6.72 and
53.25. The minimum and maximum phosphorus level was observed during post-monsoon
period and the values are 7 and 82.
Potassium
The minimum and maximum potassium level was observed during south-west
monsoon period and the values are 15.62 and 239.5. The minimum and maximum potassium
level was observed during north-east monsoon period and the values are 5.85 and 512. The
75
minimum and maximum potassium level was observed during for post-monsoon period and
the values are 22.62 and 501.0
Zinc
The minimum and maximum zinc level was observed during south-west
monsoon period and the values are 0.22 and 15.62. The minimum and maximum zinc level
was observed during north-east monsoon period and the values are 0.31 and 6.35. The
minimum and maximum zinc level was observed during post-monsoon period and the values
are 0.16 and 0.89.
Copper
The minimum and maximum copper level was observed during south-west
monsoon period and the values are 0.80 and 13.16. The minimum and maximum copper level
was observed during north-east monsoon period and the values are 0.55 and 3.23. The
minimum and maximum copper level was observed during post-monsoon period and the
values are 0.54 and 2.32.
Iron
The minimum and maximum iron value was observed during south-west
monsoon period and the values are 0.71 and 13.16.The minimum and maximum iron level
was observed during north-east monsoon period and the values are 1.41 and 12.17. The
minimum and maximum iron level was observed during post-monsoon period and the values
are 4.45 and 15.21.
76
Magnesium
The minimum and maximum magnesium level was observed during south-
west monsoon period and the values are 0.86 and 28.55. The minimum and maximum
magnesium level was observed during north-east monsoon period and the values are 9.21 and
16.00. The minimum and maximum magnesium level was observed during post-monsoon
period and the values are 9.17 and 15.62.
3.5.7. Principal component analysis
The results of PCA in the soil samples of 25 sites in Tamiraparani Riverine
wetlands (Tables 3.5.1, 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 and in Figures 3.1.1, 3.1.2 and 3.1.3) were grouped
into five-components that accounts for 75.79 % of all the data variation. PC1 represented
26.41% of the total variance and is the most important component. This distribution was
control by K, Na, Mg, Fe, and Mn and, partially by Zn and Co in the first principal
component which could be due to non-point source such as agricultural activities. Principal
component analysis yielded 5 components and these were retained for interpretation. The
communalities for soil attributes indicate that the five components explained more than 90%
of the variance in north east monsoon for nitrogen when compare with other two seasons,
phosphorus and potassium ratio were 80 to 70% for south-west monsoon season period and
post-monsoon season period 60-70% of the variance in Zn, Cu, Fe and Mn less than 60%.
The principal component 1 (PC1) was named the base status factor because it had a high
positive loading on cation exchange capacity and a high positive loading on exchangeable Zn
(0.73) and CU (0.90) and a moderate positive loading for MN (0.73).
3.6. Discussion
A soil pollutant is a factor which deteriorates the quality, texture and mineral
content of the soil or which disturbs the biological balance of the organisms in the soil
77
(Zhang et al., 2007). Soil nutrients are important for plant growth and development. Plants
obtain carbon, hydrogen and oxygen from air and water. But other necessary nutrients like
nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sulfur and more must be obtained
from the soil (Lark, 2002). Pollution in soil has adverse effect on plant growth (Singh et al.,
2004).
In the present study, pH was slightly higher in Tamiraparani River soil, which
may be due to greater input of effluents from different types of industries. But lower than the
finding of a similar study carried out by Adjia et al., (2008). In addition to lack of inputs as a
factor causing soil degradation, High soil salinity and alkalinity restricts plants growth by
reducing the osmotic potential, decreasing nutrient availability and soil physical quality
parameters. The study of soil pH is important since it controls the base status and microbial
activities (Venkatachalam, 2007). The acidic nature of soils as observed presently could also
be a property inherited directly from the parent material. At low pH, acidity can directly
inhibit plant growth and make most of the elements including toxic metals in soil bioavailable
and induce production of toxic soluble-aluminum in the soil-water solution. This might be as
a resultant of the absorption of metals in the soil (Lee, 2003). The moderately alkaline pH
of the soil indicates the deteriorate quality of the soil. High soil pH greatly reduces the
solubility of soil manganese and therefore its availability to roots (Pan et al., 2007).
Electrical conductivity value was significantly higher during post-monsoon
period as compared to the other two seasons (north-east monsoon and south-west monsoon).
The high values of electrical conductivity in the area indicated that anthropogenic activities
are too high in the river contributing significant rise in the electrical conductivity level
(Paine, 2003). The increased conductivity might be attributed to high deposition of salts of
sulphates and phosphates (Kaffka et al., 2005).
78
There is no change in soil texture for three seasons. Nitrogen values are noted
as higher during post-monsoon period. The nitrogen is one of the most important factors
controlling potentially mineralizable nitrogen in riverine wetland soils (Leinweber et al.,
2000). Nitrogen is generally limiting due to its low content in study area and its high
propensity to absorption on mineral surfaces (Coulombe et al., 1996). Na is one of the most
critical elements in soil permeability (Azeez et al., 2000). That deflocculates the soil
(Senthilnathan and Azeez 1999) and makes the crust impermeable. An excess of neutral salts
of Na leads to an alkaline condition is usually termed soil salinity (Rosicky et al., 2006).
Another feature of the saline–alkaline soil studied by Seifi et al., 2010 and in the case high
pH values coinciding with high Na content. High Na is indicators of an alkaline soil (Singh et
al., 2005).
In the present study, phosphorus was slightly higher during south-west
monsoon period. The phosphorus concentrations in the studied soil samples were found
greater than those reported by Iqbal and Shah (2011). But its concentration was found lower
then that reported by Muhammad et al., (2011). Micronutrient plays a vital role in
maintaining soil health and also productivity of aquatic plants. Zinc concentrations in soil
samples was found to be lower than the Indian standards (250 mg/kg) but higher than those
reported by other researchers for Indian soils (Shah et al., 2011). The low concentration of
zinc in river soil could be due to the fact that pH of water samples was slightly alkaline and
its solubility is a function of decreasing pH (Aamir and Tahir, 2003). Low intake of zinc
ultimately resulted in growth retardation, immaturity and anemia in human (Vijaya Bhaskar
et al., 2010)
Cu concentrations in 90% of the soil samples of two sites were found below
1.0 mg/kg north-east monsoon season. This is in agreement with the observations of Wong et
al., (2004) who reported that concentrations for most of the surface soils not exceeded 1.0 to
79
1.1 mg/kg worldwide. While it was found lower than that reported by Malik et al., (2010)
reported in low Cu soils collected from different areas of India. Generally, in most of the soils
was maximum and minimum Cu was observed during south-west monsoon period.
The concentrations of Fe in all sites were found higher (14.20 mg/kg) than the
reported by other researchers (Tume et al., 2011). The concentration of Mn was found higher
than the reported by Sharma et al., (2007) in the soils of Sudurban areas of Varanasi, India.
While manganese (Mn) is present in the soil as free Mn2+
, which is readily available to plants
and as oxides of low solubility. High soil pH greatly reduces the solubility of soil manganese
and therefore its availability to roots. Magnesium value was observed high during north-east
monsoon period, when compare with other two seasons. Thus the present status of
manganese in the soil revealed its poor quality in terms of manganese (Johnston, 1996). This
study show that Mn content in soil was higher during post-monsoon season as compared to
rest of the seasons. Similarly, observed the levels of manganese were lower during north-east
monsoon period than during post-monsoon season period (Ramesh and Vennila, 2012). In the
soil excess potassium causes a loss of plant structure (Joshi and Kumar, 2011).
The chemical properties of the soils varied considerably among samples
particularly in nutrient and iron level. The total amount of N, P, K, ZN, CU, FE and Mg were
maximum in the south-west monsoon, north-east monsoon and high in post-monsoon season.
The micronutrients such as zinc, copper, iron and manganese also present in moderate level
in all the season. Among the soil samples, all the micronutrients were maximum in south-
west monsoon, north-east monsoon and minimum in post-monsoon season.
The fifth principal component analysis confirms the findings of (Mengel and
Kirkby, 1985). Phosphorus is generally limiting due to its low content in parent material and
its high propensity to sorption on mineral surfaces. Low level of phosphorus was noted
80
during north -east monsoon period. Phosphorus ranged from 10 to 60 mg/kg depending on
the parental material (Adriano, 2001). Cu, Zn, Fe and Mn can be considered as a geogenic
and anthropogenic component due to the presence of high levels in soils (Mico et al., 2006).
The high Cu values can be contributed from Cu-based agrochemicals related to specific
agronomic practices, whereas water and irrigation time can also be the source for the high Pb
values found in some soils (Rajaganapathy et al., 2011). These stations receive pollution
mostly from agricultural, river sand mining and fish farming activities.
81
Table.3.1.1 Soil parameters during south-west monsoon period
Site No. PH EC Soil Texture
1 7.6 0.38 Sandy loam
2 7.4 0.26 Sandy loam
3 7.2 0.32 Sandy loam
4 7.6 0.37 Sandy loam
5 7.2 0.21 Sandy loam
6 7.1 0.21 Sandy loam
7 7.6 0.18 Sandy loam
8 7.7 0.46 Sandy loam
9 7.4 0.28 sandy
10 7.3 0.31 sandy
11 7.5 0.33 Sandy loam
12 7.6 0.30 Sandy loam
13 7.3 0.30 Sandy loam
14 7.4 0.31 Sandy loam
15 7.5 0.45 Sandy loam
16 7.3 0.44 Sandy loam
17 7.5 0.40 Sandy loam
18 7.2 0.58 Sandy loam
19 7.3 0.61 Sandy loam
20 7.6 0.62 Sandy loam
21 7.4 0.72 Sandy loam
22 7.9 0.19 Clay sandy loam
23 6.2 0.19 Clay sandy loam
24 6.8 0.28 Clay sandy loam
25 8.2 0.95 sandy
82
Table.3.1.2.Soil parameters during north-east monsoon period
Site No. PH EC Soil Texture
1 7.0 0.29 Sandy loam
2 7.2 0.10 Sandy loam
3 7.2 0.13 Sandy loam
4 6.6 0.28 Sandy loam
5 8.2 0.16 Sandy loam
6 7.2 0.18 Sandy loam
7 7.1 0.14 Sandy loam
8 6.8 0.11 Sandy loam
9 6.9 0.20 Sandy loam
10 7.4 0.30 Sandy
11 7.9 0.12 Sandy
12 8.1 0.18 Sandy loam
13 7.6 0.29 Sandy loam
14 7.3 0.58 Sandy loam
15 6.1 0.82 Sandy loam
16 6.5 0.22 Sandy loam
17 6.8 0.12 Sandy loam
18 7.4 0.38 Sandy loam
19 7.5 0.40 Sandy loam
20 7.4 0.78 Sandy loam
21 6.8 1.42 Sandy loam
22 6.9 0.27 Sandy loam
23 7.2 0.26 Clay sandy loam
24 8.3 0.48 Clay sandy loam
25 7.3 0.78 Clay sandy loam
83
Table.3.1.3. Soil parameters during post-monsoon period
Site No. PH EC Soil Texture
1 6.5 0.09 Sandy loam
2 7.1 0.08 Sandy loam
3 8.1 0.15 Sandy loam
4 6.6 0.14 Sandy loam
5 6.4 0.20 Sandy loam
6 6.6 0.18 Sandy loam
7 6.4 0.20 Sandy loam
8 6.6 0.29 Sandy loam
9 8.1 0.15 Sandy
10 7.4 0.22 Sandy
11 7.8 0.32 Sandy loam
12 8.1 0.98 Sandy loam
13 6.9 0.77 Sandy loam
14 6.8 0.76 Sandy loam
15 7.4 0.32 Sandy loam
16 7.1 0.31 Sandy loam
17 7.1 0.20 Sandy loam
18 8.4 1.10 Sandy loam
19 6.7 0.29 Sandy loam
20 7.1 0.36 Sandy loam
21 6.6 0.18 Sandy loam
22 6.5 0.11 Clay sandy loam
23 7.2 0.03 Clay sandy loam
24 7.3 0.42 Clay sandy loam
25 8.1 0.98 Sandy
84
Table.3.2.1. Soil parameters during south-west monsoon period.
Site No.
Macro Nutrients Micro Nutrients
Nitrogen Phosphorous Potassium Zn Cu Fe mn
1 24 3.5 65 0.66 1.10 11.76 14.2
2 28 5.5 71 0.59 1.20 9.63 12.13
3 49 3.8 51 0.47 1.30 7.42 11.11
4 46 4.3 50 0.61 1.69 7.20 10.16
5 48 4.5 63 0.63 2.01 6.00 9.14
6 49 17.0 132 0.49 0.82 8.21 12.80
7 43 19.1 169 0.35 0.98 9.36 10.40
8 74 16.8 102 0.72 0.96 9.02 11.11
9 75 20.0 103 0.76 0.92 9.16 10.20
10 92 19.3 57 0.61 0.92 10.78 10.01
11 28 17.8 142 8.98 1.04 8.98 10.14
12 63 18.6 115 8.70 1.16 10.18 10.30
13 128 25.2 174 0.67 1.19 7.98 15.01
14 45 18.0 153 0.36 1.09 8.89 9.18
15 26 9.7 147 0.88 1.12 9.99 10.18
16 65 8.5 55 0.58 1.19 9.64 12.12
17 38 10.2 170 0.60 0.90 5.40 12.90
18 52 11.4 18 18.60 2.82 8.99 10.19
19 37 9.5 158 0.85 0.96 10.90 9.90
20 44 13.9 158 0.72 0.97 13.66 10.02
21 128 9.8 230 12.66 11.40 0.68 0.90
22 36 9.1 155 0.25 0.92 6.50 14.70
23 132 10.2 180 12.33 12.00 0.62 0.99
24 186 68.0 218 15.60 10.80 0.89 1.30
25 118 56.6 240 0.82 0.99 14.01 11.38
85
Table.3.2.2.Soil parameters during north-east monsoon period.
Site No.
Macro Nutrients Micro Nutrients
Nitrogen Phosphorous Potassium Zn Cu Fe mn
1 11 12.5 285 0.86 1.18 6.12 12.66
2 13 15.3 290 0.90 1.19 6.18 12.75
3 10 15.1 301 0.92 1.20 6.90 12.60
4 48 49.2 509 0.62 1.72 8.68 12.16
5 51 50.3 510 0.68 1.90 9.01 12.28
6 38 43.7 499 0.78 1.70 8.22 12.80
7 30 44.5 501 0.60 1.72 8.40 13.10
8 60 15.6 104 0.58 1.13 8.70 10.30
9 82 16.1 106 0.67 1.72 8.12 11.48
10 85 17.2 109 0.60 1.72 9.50 12.30
11 44 14.6 142 0.38 1.08 9.16 9.16
12 50 18.0 170 0.78 1.90 10.60 10.33
13 42 50.4 60 0.30 0.92 10.12 12.10
14 38 35.0 58 0.58 0.96 10.75 12.11
15 40 36.8 60 0.60 0.99 10.80 12.32
16 22 24.6 160 0.45 0.50 12.32 12.52
17 24 16.1 160 0.32 0.57 12.36 14.01
18 67 16.8 108 0.55 1.30 8.40 15.10
19 68 18.6 120 0.50 1.40 15.00 13.10
20 90 16.3 100 0.40 1.80 9.60 13.00
21 82 7.2 29 0.70 1.50 1.65 10.40
22 85 7.9 36 0.70 1.55 0.70 10.48
23 16 20.1 380 0.80 3.40 8.11 16.10
24 14 19.2 270 0.70 2.60 8.10 11.30
25 67 16..8 130 0.75 3.00 11.80 17.00
86
Table.3.2.3.Soil parameters during post-monsoon period.
Site No.
Macro Nutrients Micro Nutrients
Nitrogen Phosphorous Potassium Zn Cu Fe Mn
1 27 4 67 0.69 1.13 11.89 15.8
2 30 5 73 0.61 1.32 9.70 14.1
3 49 3 51 0.47 1.30 7.42 11.11
4 47 4 52 0.52 1.30 7.10 10.12
5 50 4 64 0.59 2.09 6.20 9.60
6 49 18 130 0.32 0.83 8.10 13.21
7 72 18 106 0.76 0.79 8.16 11.12
8 106 27 58 0.27 0.93 10.12 12.06
9 92 19 57 0.61 0.92 10.78 10.01
10 29 17 150 8.42 1.09 8.99 10.20
11 64 18 116 8.82 1.16 10.01 10.34
12 223 26 162 0.48 1.18 7.68 16.17
13 43 18 160 0.38 1.01 8.80 9.18
14 26 9 147 0.88 1.12 9.99 10.18
15 65 9 58 0.64 1.30 9.88 12.68
16 36 12 175 0.65 0.92 6.50 14.70
17 36 9 155 0.72 0.94 10.85 9.88
18 37 9 158 0.85 0.96 10.90 9.90
19 44 13 158 0.72 0.97 13.66 10.02
20 130 9 210 2.68 11.80 0.72 0.92
21 135 9 218 2.98 11.88 0.79 0.98
22 36 10 168 0.24 0.95 7.70 14.62
23 132 10 180 2.33 12.00 0.62 0.99
24 186 69 218 5.60 11.10 0.90 1.30
25 118 58 256 0.90 0.98 14.20 11.40
87
Table.3.3.Seasonal variations of physico-chemical parameters of soil
Parameters UnitsSouth-west
monsoon
North-east
monsoonPost-monsoon
pH - 8.2 8.3 8.1
Ec mho/cm 0.95 0.78 0.98
Nitrogen mg/l 186 90 223
Phosphorous mg/l 68.0 50.4 69.2
Potassium mg/l 510 240 256
Zinc mg/l 18.0 0.92 8.82
Copper mg/l 12.00 3.00 11.88
Iron mg/l 14.01 12.36 140.20
Magnesium mg/l 12.90 17.21 14.62
Table.3.4.1.Soil variables of chemical parameters during south-west monsoon period
Min Max MeanStandard
deviationSkewness Kurtosis
Coefficient
variation
N 25.25 225.75 70.46 50.94951 1.758792 2.883347 72.30983
P 3.825 116.5 20.626 24.61662 2.939936 9.654315 119.3475
Po 15.625 239.5 125.1234 62.54762 0.032573 -1.01839 49.98875
Zn 0.22 15.625 3.3497 5.237071 1.519028 0.646422 156.3445
Cu 0.805 13.16 2.488 3.577991 2.430256 4.535933 143.8099
Fe 0.7125 13.705 8.1971 3.425323 -0.94216 0.896743 41.78701
Mn 0.8625 28.55 10.7083 5.285351 0.952174 5.458269 49.35752
88
Table.3.4.2.Soil variables of chemical parameters during north-east monsoon period
Min Max MeanStandard
deviationSkewness Kurtosis
Coefficient
variation
N 1.65 115 47.3489 32.22021 0.173442 -0.79436 68.04849
P 6.725 53.25 22.282 12.08989 1.234737 0.765411 54.25854
Po 5.85 512 178.437 131.81 1.355457 1.386542 73.86921
Zn 0.3125 6.3575 0.83 1.161436 4.862665 24.05201 139.9321
Cu 0.55 3.23 1.5861 0.765367 1.030677 0.204137 48.25467
Fe 1.4125 12.175 9.167 2.250361 -1.71329 4.797005 24.5485
Mn 9.2175 16 12.5182 1.608643 0.287536 0.577418 12.85044
Table.3.4.3.Soil variables of chemical parameters during post-monsoon period
Min Max MeanStandard
deviationSkewness Kurtosis
Coefficient
variation
N 16.25 209.5 100.19 65.61465 0.439613 -1.03241 65.49022
P 7 82 31.7473 17.42968 1.176128 1.640152 54.90129
Po 22.625 501 152.86 115.5988 2.229823 5.619833 75.62399
Zn 0.165 0.89 0.5019 0.213558 -0.064 -0.71494 42.54986
Cu 0.54 2.3225 1.1615 0.328144 1.462037 6.110901 28.2517
Fe 4.4575 15.21 9.8405 2.599404 0.01749 0.049936 26.41537
Mn 9.175 15.625 11.2143 1.481598 0.987426 1.790083 13.21169
89
Figure.3.1.1. PCA of chemical parameters during south-west monsoon period
Table.3.5.1.PCA of chemical parameters during south-west monsoon period
Table.3.5.2. PCA loadings of soil quality parameters during
south-west monsoon period
Axis 1 Axis 2 Axis 3 Axis 4 Axis 5 Axis 6 Axis 7
N 0.6883 0.4561 -0.1969 -0.4149 0.0733 0.3193 0.002116
P 0.3893 0.8244 0.319 -0.00824 -0.1057 -0.2361 -0.00544
Po 0.3054 0.2327 -0.7593 0.5207 -0.05122 -0.0367 0.02923
Zn 0.5557 -0.0248 0.5043 0.6195 -0.05667 0.222 -0.00067
Cu 0.9012 -0.2095 0.1048 -0.03482 0.3228 -0.1321 0.1009
Fe -0.791 0.3554 0.03365 0.2355 0.4342 0.03345 -0.04247
Mn -0.9453 0.2351 0.1109 -0.00328 -0.09565 0.09999 0.1401
PC Eigen values % variance
1 3.35873 47.982
2 1.168 16.686
3 0.995862 14.227
4 0.883786 12.626
90
Figure. 3.1.2. PCA of chemical variables during north-east monsoon period
Table.3.5.3. PCA of chemical variables during north-east monsoon period
Table.3.5.4.PCA loadings of soil quality parameters during
north-east monsoon period
Axis 1 Axis 2 Axis 3 Axis 4 Axis 5
N -0.2507 0.1387 0.9241 0.0958 0.09402
P 0.4989 -0.5428 0.2374 -0.6088 -0.05944
Po 0.807 -0.2786 -0.2283 0.06715 0.3416
Zn 0.5335 0.7031 -0.1473 0.05497 0.2244
Cu 0.5666 0.6246 0.3633 -0.1528 0.108
Fe 0.4404 -0.6821 0.2854 0.4322 0.1296
Mn 0.7343 0.1387 0.0606 0.1913 -0.627
PC Eigen values % variance
1 2.302 32.886
2 1.76055 25.151
3 1.20117 17.16
4 0.634094 9.0585
5 0.601034 8.5862
Component 1
N
P
Po
Zn
Cu
Fe
Mn
1
2 3
4 5
6 7 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-2.4 -1.6 -0.8 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.2 4.0
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5 C
om
pone
nt 2
91
Figure.3.1.3. PCA of chemical variables during post-monsoon period
Table.3.5.5. PCA of chemical variables during post-monsoon period
Table. 3.5.6. PCA loadings of soil quality parameters during post-monsoon period
Axis 1 Axis 2 Axis 3 Axis 4 Axis 5
N 0.3056 0.86 0.2975 -0.0509 0.04152
P 0.7514 0.4924 0.157 0.2369 -0.2544
Po 0.2067 0.1854 -0.7524 0.5706 0.1721
Zn 0.7314 -0.4916 -0.2502 -0.2076 -0.05182
Cu 0.8089 -0.4543 0.08034 0.1575 -0.1695
Fe 0.8645 0.01537 0.1661 -0.2296 0.3841
Mn -0.1091 -0.3907 0.7234 0.5264 0.1298
N
P
Po
ZnCu
Fe
Mn1
2
3
45
6
7
89
10
1112
13
1415
16
1718
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-4.0 -3.2 -2.4 -1.6 -0.8 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.2
Component 1
-3.0
-2.4
-1.8
-1.2
-0.6
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.4C
om
po
nen
t2
PC
Eigen
value % variance
1 2.64923 37.846
2 1.61744 23.106
3 1.29921 18.56
4 0.78201 11.172
5 0.291851 4.1693