Chapter 26 Foreign Bodies
-
Upload
kenneth-douglas -
Category
Documents
-
view
37 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Chapter 26 Foreign Bodies
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Chapter 26Foreign Bodies
Abdomen and Superficial Structures
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
ObjectivesObjectives
• Identify and give examples of different types of soft tissue foreign bodies based on composition.
• Explain sensitivity and specificity.
• List the important information the sonographer should obtain from the patient interview and patient chart prior to providing a comprehensive sonography evaluation.
• Differentiate the different sonographic appearances of soft tissue foreign bodies based on composition, location, age, and artifacts.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
ObjectivesObjectives
• Describe the role of the sonographer prior to, during, and following sonography guided foreign body removal.
• Explain the limitations of sonography and the advantages of other imaging modalities used to image soft tissue foreign bodies.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Composition of Foreign BodiesComposition of Foreign Bodies
Organic Plant material (thorn, wood, etc.)Animal products (bee stinger, barb, etc.)
Inorganic Glass, gravel, plastic (acrylic), pencil lead, graphite, etc.
Metallic Wire, needle, fish hook, etc.
Radiography detects only 15% or less of radiolucent foreign bodies (wood, plastic, glass,
and cactus spine)
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
TransducerTransducer
• Large Footprint Screening
• 7-12 MHz
• High Resolution
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Increasing Near Field LengthWater Bath Technique
Increasing Near Field LengthWater Bath Technique
• Increase visualization of skin surface.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Increasing Near Field LengthIncreasing Near Field Length
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Edge Shadowing ArtifactsEdge Shadowing Artifacts
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Speckle Reduction Imaging & Hyperemic Flow Inflammatory RxnSpeckle Reduction Imaging & Hyperemic Flow Inflammatory Rxn
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Using Anatomy to Locate Foreign BodiesUsing Anatomy to Locate Foreign Bodies
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Foreign Body LocationForeign Body Location
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Age of the Foreign BodyAge of the Foreign Body
Acute Phase Injury less than 3 daysBright, Echogenic, ShadowingAfter 24 hours – hypoechoic halo develops (inflammatory rxn)
Intermediate Phase Injury within 3 to 10 daysAir replaced by fluid, No shadowing, Hypoechoic halo is prominent
Chronic Phase Injury more than 10 daysDense granular material develops encapsulating foreign body - GranulomaClean Shadow
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
ShadowingShadowing
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Hypoechoic RimHypoechoic Rim
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Granuloma FormationGranuloma Formation
• <Insert Figure 26-12A-B>
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Appearance of Retained Foreign BodiesAppearance of Retained Foreign Bodies
1. Echogenic with clean shadowing
2. Echogenic with dirty shadowing
3. Echogenic with distal ring down
4. Echogenic with hypoechoic ring surrounding the object
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Sonogram of Foreign Body and Air Mimicking Foreign BodiesSonogram of Foreign Body and Air Mimicking Foreign Bodies
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Documenting Foreign Body LocationDocumenting Foreign Body Location
• <Insert Figure 26-15A-B>
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Sonography-Assisted RemovalSonography-Assisted Removal
• Forceps Needle
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
LimitationsLimitations
• Varying imaging angles can decrease differentiation from bone
• Wound exploration or irrigation may decrease air bubbles in field of view
– Lidocaine injection
• False positives
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
SummarySummary
• The sonography examination relies on the skill, knowledge, and accuracy of the sonographer who pays attention to the composition, location, age, and artifacts associated with foreign bodies.
• The experienced sonographer has an important role prior to, during, and following sonography-guided foreign body removal.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
SummarySummary
• Recognizing foreign body detection and removal is a unique and evolving application of emergency sonography.
• Sonography should become the main imaging tool used for the detection and localization of soft tissue foreign bodies because of its sensitivity, it is noninvasive, and it provides a high-resolution, real time evaluation.