Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation...

37
© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011 Ch. 7 Lecture Notes Sections 7.1-7.7 (Salgado) Reading Assignment Other Materials Problems 7-7, 7-6, 7-16 b Homework Assignment 7 Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 1

Transcript of Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation...

Page 1: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Ch. 7 Lecture Notes○

Sections 7.1-7.7 (Salgado)○

Reading Assignment

Other Materials

Problems 7-7, 7-6, 7-16 b○

Homework Assignment 7

Ch 7 Foundation EngineeringWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 1

Page 2: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Site Investigation Strategy

1. Obtain an understanding of the potential geologic and geotechnical conditions of the proposed site by reviewing regional studies. Also, consult with other professionals who have worked in the area to obtain their opinion regarding potential conditions and issues at the site.2. Obtain aerial photography (historical and recent), geologic and soil maps and other sources of subsurface information.3. Obtain drawing of the facilities planned for construction including the foot print of the building, foundation locations, areas of cut and fill, utilities, property lines, etc.4. From this information, develop a first phase of investigation to improve your understanding about key issues and obtain the data necessary to complete preliminary engineering analyses.5. Perform the assessment and calculations of the phase 1 data to understand the sensitivity of the analyses to key soil and groundwater input. The potential range of outcomes should be estimated by varying the key inputs within the possible ranges suggested by the characterization data.

a. Safe or adequate performance expectedb. Unsafe or with inadequate performance likelyc. Unknown condition or performance

6. From the phase 1 assessment, decide if the conditions at the site and the performance of the geosystem falls with the following categories:

7. For case 6a, decided if additional data or analyses are needed, if any, to complete the design. For case 6b, decide what design modification and/or ground improvement is necessary to obtain acceptable performance. In some cases other foundation types and construction methods will need to be used. In a few instances the planned site will have to be abandoned and another location selected. For case 6c, decide what key conditions must be better defined to complete the design and plan a phase II investigation.

Site InvestigationsWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 2

Page 3: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Required Information

a. X, Y, Z coordinates for each borehole locationb. Legendc. North arrowd. Scalee. Date

1. Site map or plan view with facility locations and borehole locations

a. Soil layers with soil type and thicknessb. Depth to groundwaterc. Representative cross-section of cuts, fills and embankment

2. Detailed and representative cross sections including the following:

a. CPT tip, sleeve, friction ratio and pore pressure versus depthb. SPT N values versus depthc. Unit weight versus depth. Liquid limit, plastic limit and moisture content versus depth

3. Plots of basic soil properties versus depth

4. Plots of consolidation properties

a. Preconsolidation stress versus depthb. Compression indices versus depthc. Coefficient of consolidation versus depth

a. Effective stress phi angle versus depth (sands and non-plastic silts)b. Undrained shear strength versus depth (clays and plastic silts)c. Effective stress parameters versus depth (sands and clays for long-term stability)

5. Plots of shear strength properties versus depth

Site Investigations (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 3

Page 4: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Borehole Map and LogWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 4

Page 5: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

>

Depth PlotsWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 5

Page 6: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Hollow Stem Auger

Mud Rotary Drilling with bit

Coring

Drilling Techniques (Comparison)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 6

Page 7: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Mud rotary drilling is most commonly used to create a stable hole that can then be used

for other purposes, such as to create water wells, or for seismic testing.Slim hole rotary with the rods in compression

As mentioned previously, drilling works by applying downward pressure to a bit to cut

into ground. This method uses the pressure of compressed rods to push down on the bit.

The rods are slightly smaller than the bit and are supported by the hole. When the weight

of the rods becomes greater than the pressure needed on the bit, the driller reverses the

drill pull down to hold the drill string back.

Advantages

This method can be used by all sizes of drill rigs at any angle.

Disadvantages

The holes can deflect easily, and need special drilling techniques and equipment to keep

the hole straight.Single tube reverse circulation

Reverse circulation is used for drilling large diameter holes. Mud is pumped down the

outside of the hole to the bit. A centrifugal pump sucks the fluid and drill cuttings up

inside the drill string, where it is discharged into a large settling pit

Pasted from <http://toolboxes.flexiblelearning.net.au/demosites/series7/706/units/mud/index.htm>

Drilling Techniques (Mud Rotary)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 7

Page 8: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Pasted from <http://www.geology.sdsu.edu/classes/geol552/hollowstem.htm>

a helical or spiral tool form is used to move material from the subsurface to the surface

a bit at the bottom cuts into the subsurface material •spiral augers on outside convey the material to the surface while spinning •

AUGER DRILLING

center of auger is hollow like a straw when the inner drive rods and plug are removed

during drilling or formation cutting, the center is filled with rods connected to a plug at the bottom bit

once the desired drilling depth is reached, the center plug and rods can be pulled out - leaving the hollow augers in place

the hollow augers hold the borehole open for sediment sampling and well installation

HOLLOW-STEM AUGER

Pasted from <http://www.geology.sdsu.edu/classes/geol552/hollowstem.htm>

Drilling Techniques (Auger and Hollow Stem Auger)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 8

Page 9: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Drilling Techniques (Rock Coring)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 9

Page 10: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Standard Penetration Test (SPT)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 10

Page 11: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Standard Penetration Test (SPT) (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 11

Page 12: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

(Old - Not Used) (Donut Hammer)(Ch = 45/60)

(Safety Hammer)(Ch = 60/60)

Ch = ER hammer/ER safety hammer = ER hammer/60 percent where ER = energy ratio

Standard Penetration Test (SPT) (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 12

Page 13: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Cr = 0.75 for rod length < 4m

Cr = 0.85 for 4m <= rod length < 6m

Cr = 0.95 for 6m <= rod length < 10 m

Cr = 1 if rod length => 10 m

Correction for rod length

Correction for borehole diameter and liner

Cd = 1 For 66 to115 mm

Cd = 1.05 For 116 < diameter <= 150 mm

Cd = 1.15 For 151 < diameter < 200 mm

CS = 1.0 ( with liner)CS = 1.2 (without liner)

Standard Penetration Test (SPT) (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 13

Page 14: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

PA = reference stress (100 kPa) or 1 tsf

Standard Penetration Test (SPT) (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 14

Page 15: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Relative Density from SPT

DR% / 100% = N60 / (A+BC*v'/PA)

Applicable for DR between 35 and 85 percent

And v' between 50 and 250 kPa

27 <= A < 46 or average A = (27+46/2) = 36.5B = 27C = Ko/KoNC

Standard Penetration Test (SPT) (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 15

Page 16: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Peak Drained Friction Angle from SPT (sand)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 16

Page 17: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Thin Walled Sampler (Shelby Tube)

Shelby Tube attached to a piston sampler

Undisturbed Soil and Rock SamplingWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 17

Page 18: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Double Barrel CoreSampler for Rock

Undisturbed Soil and Rock Sampling (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 18

Page 19: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Srm = CwSir

Weakness in Rock MassWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 19

Page 20: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Cone Penetrometer TestWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 20

Page 21: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Small truck mounted rig

Pasted from <http://www.conetec.com/site_investigation_equipment/cpt_trucks.aspx>

Large truck mounted rig

Cone Penetrometer Test (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 21

Page 22: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Trailer rig

Track mounted rig (all-terrain)

Cone Penetrometer Test (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 22

Page 23: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Typical CPT data

Clay likematerials

Sand likematerials

NoteHighPorePressuresIn Clay

Cone Penetrometer Test (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 23

Page 24: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Cone Penetrometer Test (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 24

Page 25: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Cone Penetrometer Test (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 25

Page 26: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Cone Penetrometer Test (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 26

Page 27: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Cone Penetrometer Test (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 27

Page 28: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Soil behavior type plotted as a function of depth to show the soil layers present in the subsurface profile

Cone Penetrometer Test (cont.)Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 28

Page 29: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Seismic cone penetrometer testing (SCPT) done in conjunction with standard CPT

Interpretation of SCPT

Seismic Cone Penetrometer TestWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 29

Page 30: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Critical state friction angle for sandy materials as a function of lateral (i.e., horizontal) effective stress and normalized tip resistance.

Engineering Properties from CPTWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 30

Page 31: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Critical state friction angle for sandy materials as a function of lateral (i.e., horizontal) effective stress and normalized tip resistance.

Engineering Properties from CPTWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 31

Page 32: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Estimating effective lateral stress from normalized CPT resistance.(Needed from previous critical state friction angle charts.

Engineering Properties from CPTWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 32

Page 33: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Estimating horizontal coefficient of consolidation from CPTU (cone penetrometer dissipation tests.

t90 = 2875s

t90 = 48 min

d

0.15 d

t90 / t50 = 0.848/0.196t50 = 48 min * (0.196/0.848)t50 = 11 min

u2 (shoulder mounted piezometer is most common)

T = ch t/H2

Engineering Properties from CPTWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 33

Page 34: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Engineering Properties from CPTWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 34

Page 35: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Undrained shear strength, su

Engineering Properties from CPTWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 35

Page 36: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

Nk = 14 recommended for Lake Bonneville silty clay and clayey silt

NC and OC Clay (Ladd 1977)○

(su/v')OC = (su/v')NC*OCR0.8

Adjusting su for overconsolidation

Engineering Properties from CPTWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 36

Page 37: Ch 7 Foundation Engineeringbartlett/CVEEN5305/Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization... · Ch 7 Foundation Engineering Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page

© Steven F. Bartlett, 2011

BlankWednesday, August 17, 2011 12:45 PM

Ch. 7 - Site Chracterization Page 37