Case Study- EnPI Bench-marking for Foundry Sector | EIMAS Demonstration Project
-
Upload
umesh-bhutoria -
Category
Data & Analytics
-
view
596 -
download
0
Transcript of Case Study- EnPI Bench-marking for Foundry Sector | EIMAS Demonstration Project
ENPI BENCHMARKING IN FOUNDRY
SECTOR UNITS AT COIMBATORE &
BELGAUM
ENERGY EFFICIENCY & RENEWABLE ENERGY IN SELECTED MSME
CLUSTERS IN INDIA.
www.foundry.en-view.com
About GEF-UNIDO-BEE Project
UNIDO is currently implementing a GEF funded project titled „Energy Efficiency andRenewable energy in selected MSME Clusters in India‟. Bureau of Energy Efficiency(BEE) is the executing agency for the same.
The project focuses on 12 clusters in 5 sectors, namelyBrass, Ceramics, dairy, Foundry and Hand tools.
The three clusters in the foundry sector are Belgaum Coimbatore and Indore.
The project proposed 29 demonstration projects across these 5 sectors and 12clusters, including the demonstration project titled ‘Energy Information Managementand Analytics System for Foundries in Belgaum and Coimbatore.
Contents
Factors considered for Benchmarking
Methodology & Improvisations
Findings &Adjustment Factors
Rankings before and after Normalization
Limitations
Way Forward
Factors Considered For Benchmarking
Raw Material
Mix
Product Mix
Age of Furnace
Capacity of Furnace
Skilled WorkForce
Methodology
• Forecasting production of FG and SG grades based on the Raw Material (Universal) list.
Forecasting Production
• Based on the ratio of FG and SG type product energy consumption is forecasted and used for SEC calculation.
Forecasting Energy • Adjustment factors for
Capacity, Product Mix, Age of the Furnace are considered to find out the Normalised SEC in respect to cluster behavior.
Normalization
Improvisations/Hacks
Using independent factors from the
considered factors for normalization
Data Manipulation
Cluster Method
This was done to
overcome the lack of
data for all intervals
Statistical methodology
used to clean data
before analyzing.
Worked on inter-dependent
factors to create factors like
Capacity/Age, Skilled
Workforce / 500 kg/Hr
Capacity
Findings
Age Capacity
~8 Years ~750 Kg/Hr
SEC (Cluster Standard)
0.578 Gcal/Ton
53%
45%
2%
Product Mix %
FG SG Others
Note: Only for Induction Furnace Foundries
Adjustment Factor Product Mix
FG% SG% Other% Exp SEC
Baseline 53% 45% 2% 0.578
UNIT XYZ 21% 79% 0% 0.608
Adjustment
Factor
-5.19%
Adjustment Factor is the % change in the SEC expected if the unit was to have the
product mix similar to that of the cluster!
Adjustment Factor Age
Age Exp SEC
Baseline 8 Years 0.534
UNIT XYZ 10 0.556
Adjustment Factor -3.95%
Adjustment Factor is the % change in the SEC expected if the unit was to have the
age same as that of the cluster average.
Adjustment Factor Capacity
Installed Capacity Exp SEC
Baseline 750 Kg/Hr 0.533
UNIT XYZ 1000 Kg/Hr 0.520
Adjustment Factor 2.58%
Adjustment Factor is the % change in the SEC expected if the unit was to have the
installed capacity same as that of the cluster average.
Adjustment Factor Skilled Workforce
Skilled Workforce (Per 500
KG/Hr)
Exp SEC
Baseline 8 0.517
UNIT XYZ 7 0.547
Adjustment Factor -5.8%
Adjustment Factor is the % change in the SEC expected if the unit was to have the
same skilled workforce as that of the cluster average.
Total Adjustment Factor
-30.00%
-20.00%
-10.00%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
Unit IF1 Unit IF2 Unit IF3 Unit IF4 Unit IF5 Unit IF6 Unit IF7 Unit IF8 Unit IF9 Unit IF10Unit IF11Unit IF12Unit IF13Unit IF14Unit IF15Unit IF16
Adjustment Factor(Age) Adjustment Factor Skill Adjustment Factor Capacity Total Adjustment
Ranking Before & After Normalization
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Unit IF14 Unit IF6 Unit IF9 Unit IF12 Unit IF16 Unit IF1 Unit IF7 Unit IF11 Unit IF3 Unit IF13 Unit IF4 Unit IF5 Unit IF10 Unit IF2 Unit IF15 Unit IF8
Rank After Normalisation Rank Normal
SEC vs Cluster Standard
0.35
0.45
0.55
0.65
0.75
0.85
0.95
Unit IF1 Unit IF2 Unit IF3 Unit IF4 Unit IF5 Unit IF6 Unit IF7 Unit IF8 Unit IF9 Unit IF10 Unit IF11 Unit IF12 Unit IF13 Unit IF14 Unit IF15 Unit IF16
Actual SEC Calculated SEC Normalised SEC Industry Standard
SEC Index Product Mix
0.86
1.00
0.96
0.88 0.88
0.85
0.87
0.89
0.91
0.93
0.95
0.97
0.99
1.01
FG 200 FG 150 FG 260 FG 250 FG 300
SEC Index (FG)
SEC Index Product Mix
0.64 0.66
0.71 0.72
1.00
0.71
0.58
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
SG 400_10 SG 400_15 SG 400_18 SG 450_10 SG 450_12 SG 500_7 SG 600_3
SEC Index (SG)
Limitations
Limited “Volume” of data. Both in terms of horizontal and vertical spread.
Inconsistency in “Data” especially the Raw Material Details.
No major energy efficiency projects were implemented during the course of
EIMAS installation, hence couldn‟t be tracked in respect to changes in EnPIs.
Way Forward!
Zeroed down on a considerably relevant methodology that can be scaled in terms of making it dynamic and also including other factors.
Increased usage of EIMAs across sector will help in widening data base and also the consistency of the same.
Access to EnPIs will foster increased competitive spirit on Energy Efficiency and also provide insights that can help foundries look into operational improvements.
www.foundry.en-view.com |+91 33 4005 2780