Case Study 1
description
Transcript of Case Study 1
Case Study 1
M. B. Short, M. R. D’Orsogna, V. B., G. E. Tita, P. J. Brantingham, A. L. Bertozzi and L. B. Chayes, Math. Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, Vol 18, 1249-1267(2008)
A Statistical Model of Criminal Behaviour
The spreading of disorder: K. Keizer, S. Lindenberg, and L. Steg, Science (2008)
Crime is complex
Bowers, Johnson, Domestic Burglary Repeats and Space-Time Clusters. European journal of criminology (2004)
Repeat Victimisation
Appear at rate which is constant through space
Decides to burgle site with probability:
If the criminal agent chooses not to burgle the current location, it moves to a neighbouring house with probability:
Otherwise – if the criminal agent decides to burgle, it will then leave the system, and affect the attractiveness of the victimised site
The Discrete Model
Two dimensional lattice, grid spacing l
Attractiveness:
If a site is burgled, the dynamic component of attractiveness is adjusted as follows:
Homes, s = (i,j) Burglars
Static component
Dynamic component
The Discrete Model
M. B. Short et al Math.Models and Methods in App. Sci, Vol 18, 1249-1267(2008)
New burglar generated
A = 1
A = 1
A = 1
A = 3
q = 1/6
q = 1/6
q = 1/6
q = 3/6
Assesses attractiveness of neighbouring sitesMoves probabilisticallyBurglar removed from the systemDynamic attractiveness of local sites increase
B(t)
B(t)
B(t)
B(t)
B(t)
The Discrete Model
With thanks to Toby Davies