Bringing the World to UNO: Global Learning & Engagement Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) SACSCOC...
-
Upload
dennis-woods -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
1
Transcript of Bringing the World to UNO: Global Learning & Engagement Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) SACSCOC...
Bringing the World to UNO:Global Learning & Engagement
Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP)
SACSCOC Committee Presentation
Topic Selection
• Involved faculty, staff and students
• Utilized a web survey and multiple meetings
• Identified a small number of potential topics
• Used a survey to narrow the field to 3 topics
• Received input to use the QEP to revise the core curriculum
• Two topics combined by the President and Committee based on input received
Global Learning
and Engagement
Aligns with International
Programs, Resources, and
Initiatives
Aligns with Existing Service Learning
Program
Supports Curriculum Change in Core
(General Education) & Specialized
(Major) Levels of Study
Indicated as a Need by NSSE, Student Assessment and
Survey Data
AACU High-Impact Educational
Practices
Prioritized Topic by Students & Faculty
Aligns with UNO Mission
Supports UNO 2020 Strategic Plan
Figure 1: Factors Supporting Selection of QEP Topic
Why the QEP is important to students
• Global and intercultural knowledge is necessary for success in a global economy.
• Effective communication with members of other cultures and groups is an important skill for the workplace.
• Solving problems based on the perspectives of other groups and cultures is another important skill.
Informing the QEP Design
Professional literature
• Role of global education
• 2012 ACE report
• Curriculum redesign
• Extracurricular initiatives
• Faculty support and development
• Assessment models
Other QEPs
• Appalachian State University
• Kennesaw State University
• University of Florida
• Florida International University
• University of Texas - Tyler
Knowledge• Students identify, describe, and explain global and intercultural conditions
and interdependencies.
• Students make informed critical assessments of global events, processes, trends and issues and convey the interconnectedness of political, economic and environmental systems.
Skills• Students analyze, interpret, and evaluate global and intercultural issues
via engagement strategies including the use of information technologies.
• Students demonstrate an ability to communicate and interact effectively with members of other cultures.
Attitudes• Students reflect upon and integrate global learning and engagement
experiences.
• Students recognize and appreciate cultural diversity and multiple world views.
Figure 2: Bringing the World to UNOStudent Learning Outcomes
Global Learning & Engagement
QEP
International Programs
Service Learning Program
1. Identify courses that include specific content, requirements, and/or opportunities.
2. Work with Office of Registrar to code identified courses in catalog.
3. Establish levels of student recognition for achieving specified levels of service learning or global learning/engagement.
4. Market opportunities for global learning/engagement and service learning to UNO students, faculty and community.
Study Abroad
International Service Learning
Figure 3: Activities Collaboratively Supported byQEP and Service Learning Program
Three main components of the QEP
Curriculum• Embedding global learning and engagement activities within general
education (core) coursework
• Embedding global learning and engagement activities within courses in the major
• Work will initially focus on five majors (one per college)
Co-Curricular Activities• Campus activities and organizations
• Community activities and organizations
• Building on international activities and organizations already identified by faculty and staff
Assessment• Direct and indirect assessments
• Use of assessment data to improve effectiveness and efficiency of QEP activities
Assessments
• Direct and Indirect Measures
• 4 rubrics (from AACU Value)
• Global Perspectives Inventory
• University of Florida Survey on Communication
• Used in both general education (Core) and major requirement coursework
• Data used by Committee to identify positive practices and changes needed
Project Phases
2015-16
“Gear-Up” Year
Year 1 (2016-17)• 2 content areas (biology, English
composition) of general education (core) curriculum
Year 2 (2017-18)• All content areas of general education
(core) curriculum
Year 3 (2018-19)• Major requirement coursework in 5
majors (1 per college)
Year 4 (2019-20)• Expansion to other majors based on
interest
Year 5 (2020-21)• Sustainability Plan
Initiative 1: Curriculum Enhancement
• Action 1.1: Infuse global learning opportunities within the general education (core) curriculum.
• Action 1.2: Support targeted degree programs to serve as models of global learning.
• Action 1.3: Expand curriculum enhancement activities to other degree programs.
Initial Majors
• COBA – B.S. Management
• COEHD – B.S. Elementary Education
• COE – B.S. Civil Engineering
• COLA – B.A. International Studies
• COS – B.S. Earth And Environmental Sciences
Initiative 2: Incentivize Participation
• Action 2.1: Provide incentives for faculty to address Global Learning and Engagement learning outcomes.
• Action 2.2: Create and institutionalize a Global Learning Certificate to recognize student learning and accomplishments.
• Action 2.3: Provide administrative incentives by increasing enrollment in Global Learning/Engagement courses.
Initiative 3: Institutionalize Process
• Action 3.1: Create and institutionalize a repository of global learning practices to support improved teaching and learning.
• Action 3.2 Disseminate student learning outcomes gains internally and externally to increase awareness and promote expanded practice.
• Action 3.3: Utilize Bringing the World to UNO data to promote improved policy and practices to expand global learning efforts.
• Action 3.4: Support systems change efforts to ensure that global learning strategies and initiatives are sustained.
Incentives
• Students – Recognition at graduation
• Core Curriculum Faculty – Stipend for course redesign
• Major Requirements Faculty – Stipend for learning community
• Access to technical support from “visiting” faculty
Building Infrastructure
Creating an electronic repository
• Faculty ideas and successes at course and program levels (vetted through Academic Affairs)
• Student ideas, successes, and perspectives (vetted through Student Government Association)
Holding an annual summit focused on global learning and engagement
• Faculty, staff and student presentations
• Reaching out to others to join the initiative
Shifting management tasks from QEP Implementation Team to other university bodies and structures
Figure 4: Logic Model for the Quality Enhancement Plan
Logic Model for the QEP:Rationale
Why is this important?
• Students must be prepared to compete in a global market
• Students must understand their role within an international community
• Students need to be prepared to engage in increasingly diverse communities
Logic Model for the QEP:Inputs
What are we doing now?
• Curriculum• Global learning content in general education (core) courses• Global learning content in selected academic majors representing
each academic college• Collaboration with community resources with global focus to
support course assignments• Study abroad program
• Co-Curricular• Global learning/engagement activities sponsored by student
organizations• Freshman common read program• International learning community in residence hall
• Budget to support QEP activities• $1,153,233 budgeted over five year implementation period
Logic Model for the QEP:Activities
What will we do?• Curriculum
• Incorporate global learning/engagement content/activities in general education (core) discipline courses
• Conduct curriculum mapping for coursework in selected majors to enhance global learning/engagement
• Campus Initiatives• Increase service learning opportunities within Study Abroad program• Coordinate student recognition and curriculum development activities with the
Service Learning program
• Co-Curricular• Expand global learning/engagement activities sponsored by Student organizations• Increase international interactions
• Community• Increase collaborative work with community organizations to support global
learning/engagement activities• Increase collaborative work with international organizations to support global
learning/engagement activities
Logic Model for the QEP:Outputs
What products, events, & services will lead to program outcomes?
• Curriculum Enhancement• Number of general education (core) courses modified to include global
learning/engagement activities• Number of courses in academic majors modified to include global
learning/engagement activities• Number of students by college participating in global learning/engagement courses• Number and type of faculty participating in professional development activities
and learning communities
• Co-Curricular• Number of student organizations sponsoring global learning/engagement activities• Number and demographics of students participating in global learning/engagement
activities
• Community• Number of community organizations supporting global learning/engagement
activities• Number of international organizations supporting global learning/engagement
activities
Logic Model for the QEP:Outcome
What learning outcomes will be achieved?
• Knowledge• Students identify, describe, and explain global and intercultural conditions
and interdependencies.• Students make informed critical assessments of global events, processes,
trends and issues and convey the interconnectedness of political, economic and environmental systems.
• Skills• Students analyze, interpret, and evaluate global and intercultural issues via
engagement strategies including the use of information technologies.• Students demonstrate an ability to communicate and interact effectively
with members of other cultures.
• Attitudes• Students reflect upon and integrate global learning and engagement
experiences.• Students recognize and appreciate cultural diversity and multiple world
views.
Projected Numbers of Participating Students
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
General Education Courses
Biology/Composition 300
Art/Biology/Composition/Humanities/Math/Sciences/Social Sciences
900 1,650 2.400 3,150
Major Courses
BS Management 141 253 253
BS Elementary Education 82 117 117
BSCE Civil Engineering 35 105 105
BA International Studies 44 70 70
BS Earth, Environmental Sci 56 102 102
Other Majors 179 323
Total – Major Level Coursework 358 826 970
Grand Total 300 900 2,008 3,226 4,120
Examples of Input from Student Meetings
• UNO should use this initiative as a marketing tool to attract students
• Globalization of the curriculum is also important from the perspectives of international students
• My most important objective is getting a job – this will help me be more attractive to potential employers
• The QEP Committee should think about how prior military service in foreign countries can give credit toward earning the Global Learning and Engagement Certificate
“Gear-Up” Year
• Solidify membership of each subcommittee
• Negotiate consulting contract with key consultant
• Identify content consultants for English composition and Biology
• Identify participating faculty
• Begin professional development and course redesign (ENGL 1157 and Freshman Biology sequence)
• Create structures/format for reporting program success/benchmarks
Sustainability Plan
• Identification/codification of global learning & engagement requirements for general education “core” curriculum
• Identification/codification of global learning & engagement requirements for majors participating in QEP
• Shift in technical support/professional development from external faculty to UNO faculty
• Shift in management of course revision/adoption process from QEP Committee to university structures already in place (e.g., University Courses and Curriculum Committee)