Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background...
Transcript of Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background...
![Page 1: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Boosted Top Taggingwith Deep Neural Networks
Jannicke PearkesUniversity of British Columbia, Engineering Physics
Wojtek Fedorko, Alison Lister, Colin GayInter-Experimental Machine Learning Workshop
March 22nd, 2017
![Page 2: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
2
• Introduction • Method
– Monte Carlo Samples– Network architecture & training
• Results – Preprocessing– PT dependence– Pileup dependence– Learning what is being learnt
• Next Steps
![Page 3: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
• Train a deep neural network to discriminate between jets originating from top quarks and those originating from QCD background
3
boost
Low top pTHigh top pT
W
b
W
bImage: Emily Thompson
![Page 4: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Monte Carlo Samples• Signal: Z’ to ttbar• Background: Dijet• Generated with PYTHIA v8.219 NNPDF23 LO AS 0130 QED PDF• DELPHES v3.4.0 using default CMS card• Jets clustered using DELPHES energy-flow objects
• Anti-kT jets selected with R = 1.0• Trimming performed with kT algorithm and R = 0.2, pT frac = 5%
• Signal jets are selected where a truth top decays hadronically within 𝛥R= 0.75 of a large radius jet
• Jets are required to have 𝜂<= 2.0• Jets are subsampled to be flat in pT and signal-matched in eta• Looking at jets with pT between 600-2500 GeV
• ~ 4 million signal jets and ~4 million background jets • Sample divided into 80%, 10%, 10% for training, validation and testing
4
![Page 5: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Examples of Jet Images
5
�1.0 �0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Translated pseudorapidity ⌘
�1.0
�0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Tran
slat
edaz
imut
hala
ngle
�
Background jet with pT = 1370 GeV
10�4
10�3
10�2
10�1
100
Jetp
Tpe
rpix
el[G
eV]
�1.0 �0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Translated pseudorapidity ⌘
�1.0
�0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Tran
slat
edaz
imut
hala
ngle
�
Background jet with pT = 702 GeV
10�4
10�3
10�2
10�1
100
Jetp
Tpe
rpix
el[G
eV]
�1.0 �0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Translated pseudorapidity ⌘
�1.0
�0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Tran
slat
edaz
imut
hala
ngle
�
Background jet with pT = 2376 GeV
10�4
10�3
10�2
10�1
100
Jetp
Tpe
rpix
el[G
eV]
�1.0 �0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Translated pseudorapidity ⌘
�1.0
�0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Tran
slat
edaz
imut
hala
ngle
�
Signal jet with pT = 781 GeV
10�4
10�3
10�2
10�1
100
Jetp
Tpe
rpix
el[G
eV]
�1.0 �0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Translated pseudorapidity ⌘
�1.0
�0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Tran
slat
edaz
imut
hala
ngle
�
Signal jet with pT = 1480 GeV
10�4
10�3
10�2
10�1
100
Jetp
Tpe
rpix
el[G
eV]
�1.0 �0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0Translated pseudorapidity ⌘
�1.0
�0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Tran
slat
edaz
imut
hala
ngle
�
Signal jet with pT = 2358 GeV
10�4
10�3
10�2
10�1
100
Jetp
Tpe
rpix
el[G
eV]
Jet images are typically very sparse roughly 5-10% pixel activation on average if using a 0.1x0.1 grid [1][1] L. de Oliveira, M. Kagan, L. Mackey, B. Nachman, and A. Schwartzman, Jet-images -- deep learning edition, JHEP 07 (2016) 069, arXiv:1511.05190 [hep-ph].
![Page 6: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Neural Network Inputs
• Use sequence of jet constituents rather than image
• Advantages: – No loss of information due to pixelization in an image– Inputs are more information dense
• Using 120 constituents average activation is 30%-50%
6
![Page 7: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Training and Network Architecture
• Implemented with Keras• Initially planned on using an LSTM, but ended up using a fully connected network • We found that performance between the LSTM and the fully connected network was
very similar, but the deep networks were much faster to train (~10 times) which allowed for faster experimentation with preprocessing techniques and network architectures
7
Network Type Fully connected
Number oflayers
5,[300,150,50,10,5,1]
Number of free parameters
41,323
Activation function
Rectified linear units, sigmoid on output
Optimizer Adam
Loss Binary Cross-Entropy
Early Stopping Patience of 5
![Page 8: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Preprocessing
![Page 9: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Preprocessing
• Large radius, R = 1.0, jets are trimmed using subjets R = 0.2 found with the kT algorithm with and pT frac = 5%
• Order subjets by subjet pT and jet constituent pTwithin each subjet
• We use only the 120 highest pT jet constituents• Perform preprocessing using domain knowledge
about the physics at hand
9
![Page 10: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
No Preprocessing
10
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Top Tagging Efficiency
100
101
102
103
Bac
kgro
und
Rej
ectio
nJet pT = 600 - 2500 GeV
Trimming only
Trimming onlyAUC = 0.83Rϵ = 50% = 8.85Rϵ = 80% = 3.36
![Page 11: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Scale
• Scale pT of all jet constituents by a common factor to ensure that the constituent pT is approximately between 0 and 1
11
![Page 12: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Top Tagging Efficiency
100
101
102
103
Bac
kgro
und
Rej
ectio
nJet pT = 600 - 2500 GeV
Trimming onlyScale
Scale
12
ScalingAUC = 0.900Rϵ = 50% = 21.3Rϵ = 80% = 6.02
![Page 13: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Translate
• Center jet about highest pT subjetin 𝜂, 𝜙 plane
13
![Page 14: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Top Tagging Efficiency
100
101
102
103
Bac
kgro
und
Rej
ectio
nJet pT = 600 - 2500 GeV
Trimming onlyScaleTranslation
Translate
14
TranslationAUC = 0.924Rϵ = 50% = 33.2Rϵ = 80% = 8.48
![Page 15: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Rotate• Designed method of rotations
to preserve jet mass• Transform 𝑝', 𝜂, 𝜙 into
𝑝), 𝑝*,, 𝑝+• Rotate so that second highest
pT subjet is aligned with negative y-axis:
• Transform (𝑝), 𝑝*,, 𝑝+) back to 𝑝', 𝜂, 𝜙
15
![Page 16: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Top Tagging Efficiency
100
101
102
103
Bac
kgro
und
Rej
ectio
nJet pT = 600 - 2500 GeV
Trimming onlyScaleTranslationRotation
Rotate
16
RotationAUC = 0.932Rϵ = 50% = 42.3Rϵ = 80% = 9.57
![Page 17: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Flip
• Third subjet is not constrained, but can be moved to right half of plane
• Flip jet if average pT is in left half of plane
17
![Page 18: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Flip
18
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Top Tagging Efficiency
100
101
102
103
Bac
kgro
und
Rej
ectio
nJet pT = 600 - 2500 GeV
Trimming onlyScaleTranslationRotationFlip
FlipAUC = 0.933Rϵ = 50% = 44.3Rϵ = 80% = 9.75
![Page 19: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Performance onTruth vs Reconstructed Jets
![Page 20: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Performance after preprocessing
20
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Top Tagging Efficiency
100
101
102
103B
ackg
roun
dR
ejec
tion
Jet pT = 600 - 2500 GeV
DNN, truth⌧32, truthDNN, reco⌧32, reco
![Page 21: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Performance at 50% overall Signal Efficiency
21
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400Jet pT [GeV]
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Sig
nale
ffici
ency
Signal efficiencyBackground rejection
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400Jet pT [GeV]
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Sig
nale
ffici
ency
Signal efficiencyBackground rejection
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
Reconstructed JetsTruth Jets
AUC = 0.947Rϵ = 50% = 66Rϵ = 80% = 13
AUC = 0.933Rϵ = 50% = 44Rϵ = 80% = 9.7
![Page 22: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Pileup
![Page 23: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Performance at different levels of pileup
23
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Top Tagging Efficiency
100
101
102
103B
ackg
roun
dR
ejec
tion
Jet pT = 600 - 2500 GeV
No pile upPile up = 23Pile up = 50
Extremely stable performance with respect to pileup
![Page 24: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400Jet pT [GeV]
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0S
igna
leffi
cien
cy
Signal efficiency: No pile upSignal efficiency: Pile up = 23Signal efficiency: Pile up = 50
Background rejection: No pile upBackground rejection: Pile up = 23Background rejection: Pile up = 50
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
Performance at different levels of pileup
pT dependence also stable with respect to pileup
![Page 25: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Learning what is being learnt
![Page 26: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
0 100 200 300 400 500Jet mass [GeV]
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
DN
Nou
tput
Background Jets
0.000
0.015
0.030
0.045
0.060
0.075
0.090
0.105
0.120
P(J
etm
ass
[GeV
]|DN
Nou
tput
)
Jet Mass
26
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Jet mass [GeV]
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.014Flat pT distribution600 < jet pT < 2500 GeV
SignalBackground
![Page 27: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
0 100 200 300 400 500Jet mass [GeV]
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
DN
Nou
tput
Background Jets
0.000
0.015
0.030
0.045
0.060
0.075
0.090
0.105
0.120
P(J
etm
ass
[GeV
]|DN
Nou
tput
)
Jet Mass
27
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Jet mass [GeV]
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.014Flat pT distribution600 < jet pT < 2500 GeV
SignalBackground
![Page 28: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Next StepsShort term:• We plan to revisit LSTMs• Thorough Bayesian hyper-parameter optimization
Longer term:• Both top and W tagging with deep neural networks now
reasonably well-established on Monte Carlo• “But does it work on data?”• Start working towards evaluating the performance of these
techniques on data • Investigate effects of systematics and strategies for
mitigating the impact of systematics
28
![Page 29: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Thank you!
29
![Page 30: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
W-tagging performance on truth
30
QCD-Aware Recursive Neural Networks for Jet Physics.Louppe, Cho, Becot, Cranmer https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00748
![Page 31: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Zooming
31
Parton Shower Uncertainties in Jet Substructure Analyses with Deep Neural Networks Barnard, Dawe, Dolan, Rajcic https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.00607v2.pdf
![Page 32: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Performance when trained and tested on different levels of pileup
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400Jet pT [GeV]
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Sig
nale
ffici
ency
Signal efficiency: NN trained on µ = 23 tested on µ = 0Signal efficiency: NN trained on µ = 23 tested on µ = 23Signal efficiency: NN trained on µ = 23 tested on µ = 50Background rejection: NN trained on µ = 23 tested on µ = 0Background rejection: NN trained on µ = 23 tested on µ = 23Background rejection: NN trained on µ = 23 tested on µ = 50
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
32
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400Jet pT [GeV]
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Sig
nale
ffici
ency
Signal efficiency: NN trained on µ = 0 tested on µ = 0Signal efficiency: NN trained on µ = 0 tested on µ = 23Signal efficiency: NN trained on µ = 0 tested on µ = 50Background rejection: NN trained on µ = 0 tested on µ = 0Background rejection: NN trained on µ = 0 tested on µ = 23Background rejection: NN trained on µ = 0 tested on µ = 50
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400Jet pT [GeV]
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Sig
nale
ffici
ency
Signal efficiency: NN trained on µ = 50 tested on µ = 0Signal efficiency: NN trained on µ = 50 tested on µ = 23Signal efficiency: NN trained on µ = 50 tested on µ = 50Background rejection: NN trained on µ = 50 tested on µ = 0Background rejection: NN trained on µ = 50 tested on µ = 23Background rejection: NN trained on µ = 50 tested on µ = 50
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bac
kgro
und
reje
ctio
n
- Examined how a neural network trained at one pileup level performs on another level of pileup
- NN seems relatively robust to changes in pileup expected at the LHC in the next few years
![Page 33: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
0 100 200 300 400 500Jet mass [GeV]
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
DN
Nou
tput
Background Jets
0.000
0.015
0.030
0.045
0.060
0.075
0.090
0.105
0.120
P(J
etm
ass
[GeV
]|DN
Nou
tput
)
Jet Mass
33
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Jet mass [GeV]
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.014Flat pT distribution600 < jet pT < 2500 GeV
SignalBackground
![Page 34: Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks · Background rejection: No pile up Background rejection: Pile up = 23 Background rejection: Pile up = 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Background](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071506/61273898da7c207d61710a24/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
⌧32
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5Flat pT distribution600 < jet pT < 2500 GeV
SignalBackground
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0⌧wta
32
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
DN
Nou
tput
Background Jets
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040
P(⌧
wta
32|D
NN
outp
ut)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
⌧32
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5Flat pT distribution600 < jet pT < 2500 GeV
SignalBackground