Black Holes in Deep Surveys
description
Transcript of Black Holes in Deep Surveys
![Page 1: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Black Holes in Black Holes in Deep Deep SurveysSurveys
Meg UrryYale University
![Page 2: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The formation and evolution of galaxiesis closely tied to
the growth of black holes
Cosmic accretion (AGN) important for galaxy formation for black hole physics for understanding ionization, backgrounds, etc.
![Page 3: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Cosmic Accretion• Opticallyselected quasars not
representative, do not fairly sample cosmic accretion
• Need less biased surveys
![Page 4: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Supermassive Supermassive black holesblack holes
likely obscuredobscured by gas and dust:
1.1. Local AGN UnificationLocal AGN Unification
2.More likely in early Universe (“Grand Unification”)
3.Explains hard X-ray “background”
![Page 5: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Supermassive Supermassive black holesblack holes
likely obscuredobscured by gas and dust:
1.Local AGN Unification
2.2. More likely in early More likely in early Universe (“Grand Universe (“Grand Unification”)Unification”)
3.Explains hard X-ray “background”
![Page 6: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Supermassive Supermassive black holesblack holes
likely obscuredobscured by gas and dust:
1.Local AGN Unification
2.More likely in early Universe (“Grand Unification”)
3.3. Explains hard X-ray Explains hard X-ray “background”“background”
![Page 7: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
X-Ray “background” spectrum (superposition of unresolved AGN) is very hard
Courtesy Brusa, Comastri, Gilli, Hasinger
![Page 8: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
unabsorbed AGN spectrum
Increasing NH
![Page 9: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Deep Surveys for Obscured Accretion
• Hard X-rays penetrate most obscuration
• Energy re-radiated in infrared
• High resolution optical separates host galaxy
![Page 10: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Chandra
Spitzer
HST
![Page 11: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
GOODSGOODSGreat
Great
Observatories
Observatories
Origins
Origins
Deep
Deep
Survey
Survey
![Page 12: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
GOODSGOODSdesigned to find
obscured AGN out to
the quasar epoch, z2-3
Spitzer Legacy, HST Treasury, Chandra Deep Fields Spitzer Legacy, HST Treasury, Chandra Deep Fields
Dickinson, Giavalisco, Giacconi, Garmire
![Page 13: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
MUSYC
MUltiw
avelength
MUltiw
avelength
Survey
Survey byYale Yale &ChileChile
Gawiser, van Dokkum, CMU, Lira, Maza
![Page 14: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Extended Chandra Deep Field Extended Chandra Deep Field SouthSouth
Do GOODS/MUSYC/ surveys reveal hidden populations of obscured
AGN?
Virani et al. 2006, Lehmer et al. 2006
![Page 15: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
HST ACS color image (0.3% of GOODS)
![Page 16: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
HST+Spitzer color image (0.3% of GOODS)
![Page 17: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Understanding AGN Demographics Quantitatively
• Model X-ray spectrum constrain N(L,z,NH) w XRBG spectrum, N(Sx), N(z)
• Model full SED constrain N(L,z,NH) w XRBG spectrum, N(Sx), N(z),
plus N(Sopt), N(SIR), …Also, can assess selection effects in any filter or spectroscopy
OR
![Page 18: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
CreateCreate ensemble of AGNAGN, with continuous range of obscuration, correct SEDs for Unification (model),
known luminosity distribution, known cosmic evolutionGenerate expected survey Generate expected survey
content content at X-ray, Optical, Infrared, or any
wavelengths,as function of flux and redshiftCompare to dataCompare to data
GOODS, MUSYC,GOODS, MUSYC,SEXSI, SWIRE, CLASXS, H2XMM, AMSS,
GROTH, Lockman, Champ, …
![Page 19: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Assumptions• Hard X-ray LF & LDDE evolution for Type 1 AGN Ueda et al. 2003• Grid of AGN spectra (LX,NH) with
– SDSS quasar spectrum (normalized to X-ray)– dust/gas absorption (optical/UV/soft X-ray) – infrared dust emission Nenkova et al. 2002, Elitzur et al. 2003– L* host galaxy
• NH distribution corresponding to torus geometry (matches obs)– obscured AGN = 3 x unobscured (matches local obs)– No dependence on z (for now)– Simple linear dependence on luminosity (matches obs)
Ezequiel TreisterEzequiel Treister, CMU, Jeffrey van Duyne, Brooke Simmons, Eleni Chatzichristou (Yale U.), David Alexander, Franz Bauer, Niel Brandt (Penn State U.), Anton Koekemoer, Leonidas Moustakas (STScI), Jacqueline Bergeron (IAP), Ranga-Ram Chary (SSC), Christopher Conselice (Caltech), Stefano Cristiani (Padova), Norman Grogin (JHU) 2004, ApJ, 616, 123
Also Treister et al. 2005, 2006a, 2006b, 2007
![Page 20: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Dust emission models from Nenkova et al. 2002, Elitzur et al. 2003
Simplest dust distribution that satisfies
NH = 1020 – 1024 cm-2
3:1 ratio (divided at 1022 cm-2)Random angles NH distribution
![Page 21: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Treister et al. 2004
![Page 22: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Treister et al. 2004
![Page 23: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Results• Match optical counts, N(z) Match optical counts, N(z)
50% AGN not in CDFs50% AGN not in CDFs
• Match X-ray background• Match IR counts
– AGN are low % of IR EBL
• Integral & Swift surveys for Compton-thick AGN– Number of Compton-thick AGN may be lower
than assumed – Gives limit on reflection, accretion efficiency
• Meta-analysis obs/unobs ratio increases with z
![Page 24: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Treister et al. 2004
GOODS N+S
![Page 25: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
redshifts of Chandra deep X-ray sources
GOODS-N
Barger et al. 2002,3, Hasinger et al. 2002, Szokoly et al. 2004
Treister et al. 2004
![Page 26: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
redshifts of Chandra deep X-ray sources
GOODS-N
Barger et al. 2002,3, Hasinger et al. 2002, Szokoly et al. 2004
Treister et al. 2004
![Page 27: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Results• Match optical counts, N(z)
50% AGN not in CDFs
• Match X-ray backgroundMatch X-ray background• Match IR counts
– AGN are low % of IR EBL
• Integral & Swift surveys for Compton-thick AGN– Number of Compton-thick AGN may be lower
than assumed – Gives limit on reflection, accretion efficiency
• Meta-analysis obs/unobs ratio increases with z
![Page 28: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Treister et al. 2005
X-ray background synthesis
![Page 29: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Treister et al. 2005
X-ray background synthesis
![Page 30: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Treister et al. 2005
X-ray background synthesis
![Page 31: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Results• Match optical counts, N(z)
50% AGN not in CDFs
• Match X-ray background• Match IR countsMatch IR counts
– AGN are low % of IR EBLAGN are low % of IR EBL
• Integral & Swift surveys for Compton-thick AGN– Number of Compton-thick AGN may be lower
than assumed – Gives limit on reflection, accretion efficiency
• Meta-analysis obs/unobs ratio increases with z
![Page 32: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Near & mid-IR Spitzer
counts
Treister et al. 2005
![Page 33: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Total AGN contribution to EBL <10%
Treister et al. 2005
Infrared “Background”
![Page 34: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Results• Match optical counts, N(z)
50% AGN not in CDFs
• Match X-ray background• Match IR counts
– AGN are low % of IR EBL
• Integral & Swift surveys for Compton-thick Integral & Swift surveys for Compton-thick AGNAGN– Number of Compton-thick AGN may be lower Number of Compton-thick AGN may be lower
than assumed than assumed – Gives limit on reflection, accretion efficiencyGives limit on reflection, accretion efficiency
• Meta-analysis obs/unobs ratio increases with z
![Page 35: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
X-Ray “Background” Spectrum
1 5 10 50 100 500 Energy (keV)
100
60
40
20
10
6
4
E F
(E)
[ke
V2 c
m2 s
1 k
eV
1 s
tr1]
Treister & Urry 2005
![Page 37: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
10
1
3
3
1
1
# o
f Co
mp
ton
Th
ick
AG
N
Normalization of Reflection Component
Integral & SWIRE
Treister et al. (2007)
![Page 38: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Normalization of Reflection Component
10
8
6
4
2
Loc
al B
lack
Ho
le M
ass
Den
sity
(1
05 M
o
Mp
c3)
Marconi et al. (2004)
Shankar et al. (2004)
Treister et al. (2007)
![Page 39: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Results• Match optical counts, N(z)
50% AGN not in CDFs
• Match X-ray background• Match IR counts
– low AGN % of IR EBL
• Integral & Swift surveys for Compton-thick AGN– Number of Compton-thick AGN may be lower
than assumed – Gives limit on reflection, accretion efficiency
• Meta-analysis Meta-analysis obs/unobs ratio increases obs/unobs ratio increases with zwith z
![Page 40: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
7 surveys2341 AGN1229 with z
BL=unobscuredNL=obscured
Area as function of X-ray flux & optical mag
Treister & Urry 2006b
![Page 41: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Treister & Urry 2006b
![Page 42: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Treister & Urry 2006b
![Page 43: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Black Hole Accretion• Obscured AGN dominate at 0<z<2
– Obscuration decreases w luminosity– Obscuration increases w redshift– Explains X-ray “background” & surveys– True z-distr does peak at z>1 (incomplete spectra)
• Limits on Compton Thick AGN integral, swift, spitzer– High degree of Compton reflection
• to match observed low #s of CT AGN• to avoid overproducing local BH density
• Total bolometric AGN light < 10% of extragalactic light (mostly stars)
• Compare to local BH mass efficiency of accretion, 0.1-0.2, where
=L/mc2
![Page 44: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Carie Cardamone Shanil ViraniJeff van DuyneBrooke SimmonsEzequiel Treister (PhD 2005) Jonghak Woo (PhD 2005)Matt O’Dowd (PhD 2004)
Yasunobu UchiyamaEleni Chatzichristou
Graduate students:
Postdocs:
![Page 45: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Luminosity-dependent density evolution
Hasinger et al. 2005
>1046 ergs/s
1045-6 ergs/s
1044-5 ergs/s
1043-4 ergs/s
1042-3 ergs/s
![Page 46: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
![Page 47: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Van Duyne et al. 2007
Objects with Objects with hard hard (absorbed) X-X-ray spectra:ray spectra:
(weak) AGN or galaxy in optical
luminous thermal infrared emission
AGN SEDs in GOODS
![Page 48: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Van Duyne et al. 2007
![Page 49: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Van Duyne et al. 2007
![Page 50: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Van Duyne et al. 2007
![Page 51: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Host galaxy morphologies
Direct view of galaxy formationSimmons et al. 2007
![Page 52: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Deep Integral Survey of the XMM-LSS region
300 ksec of our 2 Msec Integral Treister et al. 2007
![Page 53: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
1 Msec Integral (300 ksec of our 2 Msec)
1 Compton-Thick 1 Compton-Thick AGNAGN
in in 150 deg150 deg22
Deep Integral Survey of the Greater XMM-LSS region
![Page 54: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Hard X-ray Counts0.1
0.01
103
104
105
1012 1011 1010 109
Treister et al. (2007)F(20-40 keV) [erg cm2 s 1]
N(>
S)
[de
g2]
Inte
gra
l
![Page 55: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
“EXO” Extreme X-ray-to-Optical AGN
B V R BVR
Z J K
KAB = 21.4
R-K = 7.88
X-ray
ECDFS ID: 29
Blue Green Red Composite optical
Redder Near-IR Reddest Near-IR
•very high redshift AGN with z > 6, or •very obscured AGN w old/dusty host galaxies at z~2
![Page 56: Black Holes in Deep Surveys](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56814be0550346895db8b9b1/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
EXOs in MUSYC ECDFS