biosorption fyp updated2

download biosorption fyp updated2

of 61

Transcript of biosorption fyp updated2

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    1/61

    THERMODYNAMIC STUDIES ON BIOSORPTION OF ZINC USING PALM

    SHELL ACTIVATED CARBON

    KAYATHRE A/P RAVEENDRAN

    A project report submitted in partial fulfilment of the

    requirements for the award of Bachelor of Engineering

    (Hons.) Chemical Engineering

    Faculty of Engineering and Science

    Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman

    April 2012

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    2/61

    ii

    DECLARATION

    I hereby declare that this project report is based on my original work except for

    citations and quotations which have been duly acknowledged. I also declare that it

    has not been previously and concurrently submitted for any other degree or award at

    UTAR or other institutions.

    Signature : _________________________

    Name : Kayathre A/P Raveendran

    ID No. : 08 UEB 03125

    Date : 13th

    April 2012

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    3/61

    iii

    APPROVAL FOR SUBMISSION

    I certify that this project report entitled THERMODYNAMIC STUDIES ON

    BIOSORPTION OF ZINC USING PALM SHELL ACTIVATED CARBON

    was prepared by KAYATHRE A/P RAVEENDRAN has met the required standard

    for submission in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Bachelor of

    Engineering (Hons.) Chemical Engineering at University Tunku Abdul Rahman.

    Approved by,

    Signature : _________________________

    Supervisor : Dr. Gulnaziya Issabayeva

    Date : _________________________

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    4/61

    iv

    The copyright of this report belongs to the author under the terms of the

    copyright Act 1987 as qualified by Intellectual Property Policy of University Tunku

    Abdul Rahman. Due acknowledgement shall always be made of the use of any

    material contained in, or derived from, this report.

    2012, Kayathre a/p Raveendran. All right reserved.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    5/61

    v

    Specially dedicated to

    my beloved grandmother, late Madam Alamaloo, mother, S.Chitra Devi and my

    beloved father S.Raveendran.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    6/61

    vi

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    I would like to thank everyone who had contributed to the successful completion of

    this project. I would like to express my gratitude to my research supervisor, Dr.

    Gulnaziya Issabayeva for his invaluable advice, guidance and his enormous patience

    throughout the development of the research.

    In addition, I would also like to express my gratitude to my loving parents

    especially my mom who is always on my side, riding along with me on my ups and

    downs as well as giving me the encouragement to pursue my dreams and friends who

    had helped and given me encouragement throughout my research.

    To my dear friends, Thilaga Laxmy Kannan, Vitya Kalaiselvam, Sumithra

    Shanmugam, Yushshendrra Shrii Kumar, Parameswari Subramaniam and all close

    members in Faculty of Engineering & Science, UTAR thanks for making my stayed

    in UTAR so colourful and enjoyable, the memory of your friendships will forever

    stay inside my heart.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    7/61

    vii

    THERMODYNAMIC STUDIES ON BIOSORPTION OF ZINC() USING

    PALM SHELL ACTIVATED CARBON

    ABSTRACT

    Toxic heavy metals in air, soil, and water are global problems that are

    growing threat to humankind. The heavy metals, which include copper (Cu), zinc

    (Zn), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), and chromium (Cr), are

    common trace constituents in the earth crust. Heavy metals are major toxicants found

    in industrial wastewaters. Thus, the removal of heavy metals from wastewater is

    necessary before any unpleasant things occur. A conventional method for removing

    metals from industrial effluents includes chemical precipitation, coagulation, solvent

    extraction, electrolysis, membrane separation, ion exchange and adsorption. Most of

    these methods are high capital and regeneration costs of the materials. Therefore,

    there is currently a need for new, innovative and cost effective methods for the

    removal of toxic substances from wastewaters. Bio-sorption is an effective and

    adaptable method and can be easily adopted in low cost to remove heavy metals from

    large amount of industrial wastewaters. Biosorption is a physicochemical process

    that occurs naturally in certain biomass which allows it to passively concentrate and

    bind contaminants (heavy metals) onto the biosorbent cellular structure. This project

    is focused more on the phenomenon of biosorption in particular, on the biosorption

    of zinc, where this entire assessment is about the thermodynamics studies on

    biosorption of zinc by different type of biosorbent materials covering the effect of

    different temperatures, effect of pH on biosorption capacity, and particle size of

    biosorbent and initial concentration of zinc aqueous solution. At the same time, the

    thermodynamics parameters such as change in standard free energy ( , enthalpy

    ( and entropy ( will be determine using several equations.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    8/61

    viii

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    DECLARATION ii

    APPROVAL FOR SUBMISSION iii

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi

    ABSTRACT vii

    TABLE OF CONTENTS viii

    LIST OF TABLES x

    LIST OF FIGURES xi

    LIST OF SYMBOLS/ABBREVIATIONS xii

    LIST OF APPENDICES xiii

    CHAPTER

    1 INTRODUCTION 1

    1.1 Background 1

    1.2 Aims and Objectives 2

    2 LITERATURE REVIEW 3

    2.1 Background 3

    2.2 Effect of agitation speed and contact time 4

    2.3 Effect of pH on the biosorption capacity 5

    2.4 Temperature Effect 6

    2.5 Initial concentration of Zinc 6

    3 METHODOLOGY 10

    3.1 Preparation of Biosorbents 10

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    9/61

    ix

    3.2 Preparation of stock solution, Zn(NO3)2 and blank solution,

    NaNO3 10

    3.3 Biosorption Experiments 11

    3.3.1 Batch Experiment 11

    3.3.2 Analytical Experiment 11

    3.4 Adsorption Equilibrium Models 12

    3.4.1 Langmuir Isotherm 12

    3.4.2 Freundlich Isotherm 13

    3.5 Biosorption Thermodynamics 14

    4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 15

    4.1 The Effect of initial zinc ion concentration 15

    4.2 The Effect of Temperature 17

    4.3 Adsorption Equilibrium Models 19

    4.3.1 Langmuir Isotherm 20

    4.3.2 Freundlich Isotherm 23

    4.4 Thermodynamics properties for biosorption of Zinc() by

    original PSAC 26

    4.5 Comparison of biosorption of Zinc(II) with different

    Adsorbents Reported in Literature 29

    4.6 Comparison of pH changes for biosorption of Zinc() with

    different adsorbent were revised 30

    5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 31

    5.1 Conclusion 31

    5.2 Recommendations 32

    REFERENCE 33

    APPENDICES 36

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    10/61

    x

    LIST OF TABLES

    TABLE TITLE PAGE

    Table 2.1: The Langmuir Isotherm parameters for Biosorption of

    Zinc () with different biosorbents. 8

    Table 2.2: The Freundlich Isotherm parameters for Biosorption of

    Zinc () with different biosorbents 8

    Table 4.1: Sorption Capacity at different temperatures and initial

    concentration 16

    Table 4.2: Freundlich and Langmuir model parameters for

    biosorption of zinc (11) with original PSAC 18

    Table 4.3: Values of 1/T and ln b for the Gibbs Energy Graph 26

    Table 4.4: Gibbs Energy for Biosorption of Zinc () ions on

    original PSAC 27

    Table 4.5: The thermodynamics parameters for the entire

    Biosoprtion of Zinc () ions on original PSAC 28

    Table 4.6: Zinc() adsorption capacities (qm) of agricultural

    waste materials 29

    Table 4.7: The biosorption of Zinc() in different pH with

    different biosorbents 30

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    11/61

    xi

    LIST OF FIGURES

    FIGURE TITLE PAGE

    Figure 4.1: The Sorption Capacity for biosorption of Zinc ()

    ions on PSAC at different temperatures 16

    Figure 4.2: The Adsorption capacity of Zinc () ions during thebiosorption process by PSAC 17

    Figure 4.3: Langmuir isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions

    on original PSAC at T = 30C 20

    Figure 4.4: Langmuir isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions

    on original PSAC at T= 40C 21

    Figure 4.5: Langmuir isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions

    on original PSAC at T = 50C 21

    Figure 4.6: Langmuir isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions

    on original PSAC at T= 60C 22

    Figure 4.7: Freundlich isotherm forbiosorption of Zinc () ions

    on original PSAC at T= 30 C 23

    Figure 4.8: Freundlich isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions

    on original PSAC at T= 40 C 24

    Figure 4.9: Freundlich isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ionson original PSAC at T= 50 C 24

    Figure 4.10: Freundlich isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions

    on original PSAC at T= 60 C 25

    Figure 4.11:Thermodynamics parameters (The Gibbs Energy) forbiosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC 26

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    12/61

    xii

    LIST OF SYMBOLS/ABBREVIATIONS

    b/K ratio of adsorption, L/mg

    Ci initial concentration of zinc ions, mg/L

    Ce final concentration of zinc ions, mg/L

    Ceq equilibrium concentration of metal , mg/L

    KF Freundlich constant of adsorption capacity, mg/g

    M mass of biosorbent, g

    n Freundlich constant of adsorption intensity

    q metal uptake, mg/g

    qmax maximum metal uptake, mg/g

    R2

    correlation coefficient

    RL dimensionless equilibrium parameter for Langmuir Isotherm

    R gas constant, J/(mol.K)

    T temperature, K

    V solution volume, mL

    standard free energy, kJ/mol

    enthalpy, kJ/mol

    entropy, kJ/mol.K

    PSAC palm shell activated carbon

    rpm revolution per minute

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    13/61

    xiii

    LIST OF APPENDICES

    APPENDIX TITLE PAGE

    A Graphs/Tables 36

    Figure A1.1 Percentage uptake of biosorption of Zinc () ions

    on original PSAC 36

    Figure A1.2 The qegraph for biosorption of Zinc () ions on

    original PSAC 37

    Figure A1.3 Thermodynamic parameter for biosorption of Zinc

    () ions on original 37

    Figure A1.4 Percentage uptake of biosorption of Zinc () ions

    on original PSAC 38

    Figure A1.5 The qegraph for biosorption of Zinc () ions on

    original PSAC 38

    Figure A1.6 Thermodynamic parameter for biosorption of Zinc

    () ions on original 39

    Figure A1.7 Percentage uptake of biosorption of Zinc () ions

    on original 40

    Figure A1.8 The qegraph for biosorption of Zinc () ions on

    original PSAC 40

    Figure A1.9 Thermodynamic parameter for biosorption of Zinc() ions on original PSAC(T = 50 C) 41

    Figure A1.10 Percentage uptake of Zinc () ions on original

    PSAC (T = 60 C) 42

    Figure A1.11 The qegraph for biosorption of Zinc () ions on

    original PSAC 42

    Figure A1.12 Thermodynamic parameter for biosorption of Zinc

    () ions on PSAC 43

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    14/61

    xiv

    Figure A1.13 Calibration graph for biosorption Zinc () ions on

    original PSAC 43

    Table A2.1 The Calibration table for the biosorption of Zinc() ions on PSAC 44

    Table A2.2 Sorption Capacity for different temperatures as

    initial concentration varies 44

    Table A2.3 Adsorption capacity for different Temperature as

    initial concentration varies 45

    B Calculations for thermodynamic parameters 46

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    15/61

    CHAPTER 1

    1INTRODUCTION

    1.1 Background

    Toxic heavy metals in air, soil, and water are global problems that are growing threat

    to humankind. The heavy metals, which include copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb),

    mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), and chromium (Cr), are common trace

    constituents in the earth crust. The metals concentrations in the ambient environment

    have increased significantly since the Industrial Revolution.

    Heavy metals are major toxicants found in industrial wastewaters. The

    increment of population throughout nation, leads to a rapid industrialization.

    Therefore, it increases the effluents and domestic wastewaters into the aquatic

    ecosystem. High usage of heavy metals in industrial activities has caused the

    discharge of them in wastewater. The discharge of metallic ions in industrial wastage

    is of great concern because their presence and accumulation have a toxic effect on

    living species. Industrial wastewater containing metal ions such as nickel, lead,

    copper, zinc and aluminum are common because the metals are used in a large

    number of industries such as electroplating, batteries manufacturing, mining, metal

    finishing, brewery, and pharmaceutical.

    Heavy metal toxicity can result in damaged or reduced mental and central

    nervous function, lower energy levels, and damage to blood composition, lungs,

    kidneys, liver, and other vital organs (International Occupational Safety and Health

    Information Centre, 1999). Thus, the removal of heavy metals from wastewater is

    necessary before any unpleasant things occur.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    16/61

    One of the gears that help to achieve the removal of heavy metal is by using

    activated carbon. A conventional method for removing metals from industrial

    effluents includes chemical precipitation, coagulation, solvent extraction, electrolysis,

    membrane separation, ion exchange and adsorption.

    Most of these methods are at high capital and regeneration costs of the

    materials. Therefore, there is currently a need for new, innovative and cost effective

    methods for the removal of toxic substances from wastewaters. Bio-sorption is an

    effective and adaptable method and can be easily adopted in low cost to remove

    heavy metals from large amount of industrial wastewaters.

    1.2 Aims and Objectives

    General Objective

    The general objective of this experiment is about the thermodynamics studies on

    biosorption of zinc by original Palm Shell activated carbon.

    Specific Objectives

    The specific objectives for this experiment are to investigate:

    1. The biosorption of zinc using palm shell activated carbon.

    2. The effect of biosorption of zinc using palm shell activated carbon at four

    different temperature. (30 , 40 50 and 60)

    3. The effect of biosorption of zinc using palm shell activated carbon at

    different range of initial concentration of zinc.

    4. The thermodynamics parameters such as change in standard free energy

    (, enthalpy ( and entropy ( for the biosorption of zinc using

    palm shell activated carbon.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    17/61

    3

    CHAPTER 2

    2LITERATURE REVIEW

    2.1 Background

    This entire review is about the thermodynamics studies on biosorption of zinc by

    different type of biosorbent materials covering the effect of different temperatures,

    effect of pH on biosorption capacity, biosorption time, and particle size of biosorbent

    and initial concentration of zinc aqueous solution. Also the review encloses the

    effects of different condition for biosorption and some methodological aspects.

    This chapter is focused more on the phenomenon of biosorption in particular,

    on the biosorption of zinc. Heavy metals are common in industrial application such

    as manufacturing of pesticides, batteries, alloys, electroplating metal parts, textile

    dyes, and steel. Zinc is one of the most crucial metals often found in effluents

    discharged from manufacturing industries. Elimination of heavy metal by biosorption

    plays an important part in wastewater treatment. Biosorption is a physicochemical

    process that occurs naturally in certain biomass which allows it to passively

    concentrate and bind contaminants onto the biosorbent cellular structure. The

    scientists and engineers hope, this remedy will provide an economical alternative for

    removing toxic heavy metals from industrial wastewater. The adsorbing biomass, or

    biosorbents, can remove harmful metals like: arsenic, lead, cadmium, cobalt,

    chromium, zinc and uranium. Biosorption can be used as an environmentally friendly

    filtering technique. There is no uncertainty that the world could benefit from more

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    18/61

    4

    precise filtering of harmful pollutants created by industrial processes. Biosorption

    uses biomass raw materials which are either abundant or wastes from other industrial

    operations. The metal-sorbing performances of certain types of biomass depend on

    the type of biomass, the mixture in the solution, the type of biomass preparation, and

    the chemico-physical environment. These studies enclose the biosorption of heavy

    metal zinc using maize leaf, egg shell powder, chicken feather, fungal biomass,

    wheat based biosorbent, rice husk, and activated carbon (Jonathan Fabrito & Aline

    Nathasiah,2009).The effect of different operating parameters such as initial

    concentration of zinc and adsorbent, temperature, particle size, effect of pH on the

    biosorption capacity, effect of agitation speed, contact time and mass on the uptake

    of zinc ions by biosorbents are enfold in this review. In addition, the biosorption

    equilibrium thermodynamic parameters for the removal of zinc using those

    biosorbents as mentioned above are enlighten in this review as well.

    2.2 Effect of agitation speed and contact time

    The agitation speed is required to enhance the chemical reaction by the biosorbent

    with the zinc ions. As the agitation speed increases, the movement of the biosorbent

    and the zinc ions increases as well, where it ensures the biosorbent and the zinc ions

    collide together. Hence, the zinc ions will bind on the cellular structure of the

    biosorbents. It is obvious that the removal efficiency of zinc ions increases

    extensively at agitation speed between 100 rpm and 350 rpm (Shuguang Lua et al.,

    2007).

    In addition, contact time also plays a part for the removal efficiency of zinc

    ions, where as the contact time increases the highest removal of zinc ions is achieved.

    The contact time for each biosorbent to absorb the metal ions is depends on the

    nature of the biosorbents. It is clearly illustrated by P.King et al., where the optimum

    time for the removal of zinc using biomassAzaclirachta Indica bark is at 45 minutes.

    Further time increases, there are no significant change is observed. So for this

    biosorbents the optimum time of 45 minute has been chosen for effective removal of

    zinc ions. Similarly, Jin-Ho Joo et.al permits that highest biosorption of zinc ions

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    19/61

    5

    was observed at after 30 minutes using bacteria biomass as the biosorbents. This

    short time required for biosorption in accordance with the results given by other

    authors showed that the maximum absorption of zinc was reached after 30 minutes.

    Overall, at the beginning of the biosorbent is added to the metal solution, the reaction

    will be very prompt within the first 5 minutes of contact. This is due to the high

    initial concentration at the initial stage, where the binding site on the biosorbent

    cellular structure is still empty.

    2.3 Effect of pH on the biosorption capacity

    It is acknowledged that biosorption of heavy metal ions by biosorbents depends on

    the pH solution. The pH medium influences the solubility of metal ions and the

    concentration of counter ions. In addition, the pH affects the speciation of metal ions

    in solution and the metal binding sites on biosorbent surface. The both carboxyl and

    hydrogen ions presence in the solution, depends on the pH value. As the pH value

    increases, the amount of carboxyl ions presence will be increases as well and vice

    versa for the amount of hydrogen ions. Since zinc ions are positively charged, it is

    preferable that the surface of the biosorbent will have higher negative charge density.

    On the other hand, at lower pH values zinc removal was inhibited, perhaps as a result

    of the competition of between hydrogen ions and zinc ions on the sorption sites.

    Therefore, the efficiency of biosorption of zinc ions can be observed at pH above 4

    (Sibel Tunali and Tamer Akar, 2005). Similar results were also reported in literature

    for different biomass system. (Y.Prasanna Kumar et al.)

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    20/61

    6

    2.4 Temperature Effect

    The temperature parameter is found to be an important tool for the sorption of zinc

    ions dealing with the thermodynamics of the biosorption process. It is promptly

    correlates to the kinetic energy of the zinc ions. Apart from that, an increase or

    decrease in temperature will cause a change in the amount of zinc being absorbed by

    the biosorbents. Temperature changes will affect a number of factors which are

    important in heavy metal ion biosorption(T.Kutsal et al.). Some of the factors include:

    i. the stability of the metal ion species initially placed in solution;ii. the stability of micro organism-metal complex depending on the biosorption

    sites;

    iii. the effect of temperature on the micro organism cell wall configuration;iv. the ionization of chemical moieties on the cell wall

    The temperature has two major effects on the adsorption process. One is that

    increasing the temperature will increase the rate of adsorbate diffusion across the

    external boundary layer and in the internal pores of the adsorbate particles because

    liquid viscosity decreases as temperature increase and the other one is that it effects

    the equilibrium capacity of the adsorbate depending on whether the process isexothermic and endothermic (Al-Qodah).

    2.5 Initial concentration of Zinc

    The initial zinc concentration is one of the key to determine the efficiency in removal

    of zinc ions. As the zinc concentration is increased, the uptake of zinc ions increases

    as well for certain level only. An increase in the concentration of zinc ions would

    cause more hydrogen ions to be released, hence causing the pH value to decrease.

    This would consistently lead to decrease in biosorption efficiency at high zinc ions

    concentration. The higher concentration of zinc ions makes the biosorption capacity

    reached a saturation value, where it doesnt give any further changes with initial zinc

    ions concentration. The review that done, for this part were found to be comparable

    with many of the reported literature. (Shuguang Lua et al., 2007).

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    21/61

    7

    2.1.5 Effect of biosorbent particle size

    The size of the biosorbent will influence the biosorption capacity. As the particle size

    increases, the surface area is reduced and, therefore the binding area is reduced as

    well. So, it will results in lower value of biosorption as the particle size increases (M.

    Tukaram Bai et al. 2010). Hence, a smaller biosorbent particle size with a larger

    surface area is more preferable.

    2.1.6 Biosorption Isotherm

    The equilibrium of the biosorption process is often described by fitting the

    experimental points with models (Gadd, et al. 1988) usually used for the

    representation of isotherm adsorption equilibrium. The Langmuir isotherms equation

    is valid for monolayer sorption onto surface containing finite number of identical

    sorption sites which is described by the following equation

    (2.1)

    where q is milligrams of metal accumulated per gram of the biosorbent material; Ceq

    is the metal residual concentration in solution; qmax is the maximum specific uptake

    corresponding to the site saturation and b is the ratio of adsorption and desorption

    rates. This is a theoretical model for monolayer adsorption. Another empirical model

    for monolayer adsorption is the Freundlich Isotherm, which is represented by the

    following equation

    (2.2)

    where KF (mg g1) and n are the Freundlich constants related to adsorption capacity

    and adsorption intensity, respectively. The adsorption capacities of the adsorbents for

    the biosorption of Zn (II) have been compared with those of other adsorbents

    reported in literature and the values of adsorption capacities have been presented in

    Table 2.1 and Table 2.2. The values reported in the form of monolayer adsorption

    capacity. The experimental data of the present investigations are comparable with the

    reported values. In this literature reviews studies, it is clearly shown that the

    Langmuir Isotherm fits the best compared to the Freundlich Isotherm.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    22/61

    8

    Table 2.1: The Langmuir Isotherm parameters for Biosorption of Zinc () with

    different biosorbents.

    Biosorbents Langmuir Isotherm

    b (L/mg) qmax (mg/g) R2 Reference

    P.simplicissimum 0.025 77.52 0.992 Ting Fan et al.2007

    Clarified Sludge 0.299 15.53 0.9971 Bhattacharya et al.

    Activated

    alumina

    0.102 13.69 0.9932 Bhattacharya et al.

    Neem Bark 0.047 13.29 0.9923 Bhattacharya et al.

    Table 2.2: The Freundlich Isotherm parameters for Biosorption of Zinc () with

    different biosorbents

    Biosorbents Freundlich Isotherm

    Kf(mg/g) n R2 Reference

    P.simplicissimum 8.248 0.4 0.887 Ting Fan et al. 2007

    Clarified Sludge 3.16 0.705 0.9964 Bhattacharya et al.

    Activated alumina 1.34 0.701 0.9923 Bhattacharya et al.

    Neem bark 0.687 0.755 0.9913 Bhattacharya et al.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    23/61

    9

    2.1.7 Thermodynamics of Biosorption

    The recent study of biosorption of Zinc (II) Ions by Calymperes erosum were carried

    out by N.A. Adesola Babarinde with the authors working mates .Thermodynamic

    parameters were obtained by varying temperature conditions over the range of 21-

    37 C by keeping other variables constant. The values of the thermodynamic

    parameters such as enthalpy energy H, Gibbs energy, G and entropy energy S

    describes the biosorption of zinc ions by Calymperes erosum. The biosorption

    process can be regarded as a heterogeneous and reversible process at equilibrium.

    The biosorption of zinc ions with different biosorbent will give negative value for

    Gibbs energy at various temperatures and the negative value indicates the biosorption

    is a feasible process (Ting Fan et al. 2007).

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    24/61

    10

    CHAPTER 3

    3METHODOLOGY

    3.1 Preparation of Biosorbents

    Palm shell activated carbon (PSAC) was provided by Bravo Green Sdn. Bhd. a

    manufacturer of the material located in Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. The material is

    obtained using steam in the physical activation process. Oil-palm shells of various

    size fractions, namely 1.0-2.0, 2.0-2.8 and 2.8-4.0 mm were used for the preparation

    of activated carbons. Detailed preparation procedures can be found elsewhere. Themass of palm shell activated carbon was measured in the range of 0.2495 mg to

    0.2505 mg.

    3.2 Preparation of stock solution, Zn(NO3)2 and blank solution, NaNO3

    Stock solutions of zinc concentration 6539 mg/L was prepared by dissolving 14.87 g

    of Zn (NO3)2 in 500 mL of blank solution. The blank solution, NaNO3 was prepared

    by dissolving 63.75 g of NaNO3 in 5 L deionised water. The solution of zinc nitrate

    was prepared using standard flasks. The range of concentration of the prepared metal

    solutions varied between 10 and 200 mg/L. The solutions were prepared by diluting

    the zinc stock solution, which were obtained by dissolving in blank solution. The pH

    of the solutions was adjusted with 0.1M HCI and 0.1M NaOH.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    25/61

    11

    3.3 Biosorption Experiments

    3.3.1 Batch Experiment

    Batch biosorption equilibrium experiments were conducted in 250 mL

    conical flasks at a constant agitation speed that is 220 rpm. The experiments were

    carried out at four different temperatures, that were 30 , 40 50

    and 60 for twelve sets readings of zinc concentration. The experiments were

    carried out in duplicate, where the total number of samples will be collected are there

    hundred sixty samples. The first run of experiment will be using the palm shell

    activated carbon. Around 10 mL of samples solution is being transferred into the test

    tube. The conical flasks that contain the sample are being placed inside the orbital

    shaker overnight. After 24 hrs, the samples were filtrated, and collected in a test tube

    for further analytical experiments lines.

    3.3.2 Analytical ExperimentThe mixture samples of the zinc ions and original PSAC were before batch

    experiment and after batch experiment were collected in a test tube. The

    measurement of the initial and equilibrium metal ions concentrations was carried out

    using ICP-OES (Optima 7000DV, Perkin Elmer).The amount of metal absorbed by

    palm shell activated carbon was calculated from the differences between metal

    quantity added to the biomass and metal content of the supernatant using thefollowing equation: Equilibrium sorption capacity, (mg/g)

    (3.1)

    Where is the metal uptake (mg/g), and are the initial and final metal

    concentrations in the solution (mg/L), respectively, V the solution volume (mL) and

    M is the mass of biosorbent (g).

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    26/61

    12

    3.4 Adsorption Equilibrium Models

    3.4.1 Langmuir Isotherm

    The relationship between the PSAC and the zinc ions was quantified by fitting the

    obtained sorption values to the Langmuir isotherm. In this case, the following form

    of the Langmuir equation is applied in Equation 3.2

    (3.2)Where qm is the maximum sorption uptake per unit mass of adsorbent in mg/g, Ce is

    the equilibrium concentration of heavy metal ions in mg/L and b is the Langmuir

    constant of sorption and desorption rate.

    To get the equilibrium data, initial zinc

    (II) concentration were varied while the adsorbent mass in each sample was kept

    constant.

    If the metal ions are taken up independently on a single type of binding site in

    such a way that the uptake of the first metal ion does not affect the sorption of the

    next ion, then the sorption process would follow the Langmuir adsorption isotherm.

    (Mubashir Hussain Nasir et. al, 2007) A further analysis of the Langmuir equation

    can be made on the basis of a dimensionless equilibrium parameter, RL (L.K. Koopal

    et. al 1994) also known as the separation factor, given by

    (3.3)

    The value of RL lies between 0 and 1 for a favorable adsorption, while RL > 1

    represents an unfavorable adsorption, and RL = 1 represents the linear adsorption,

    while the adsorption operation is irreversible if RL =0.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    27/61

    13

    3.4.2 Freundlich Isotherm

    The Freundlich isotherm equation describes the biosorption of zinc ions from

    liquid to solid surface (PSAC) and assumes that the stronger binding sites are

    occupied first and that the binding strength decreases with the increasing degree of

    site occupation. The Freundlich isotherm assumes a heterogeneous surface with a

    non-uniform distribution of heat of adsorption over the surface. This isotherm can be

    described as equation 3.4.

    (3.4)

    where

    = equilibrium metal uptake, mg/g

    KF= Freundlich constant of adsorption capacity, mg/g

    Ce = final concentration of zinc ions, mg/L

    n = Freundlich constant of adsorption intensity

    Equation 3.5 can be transformed into a linear equation form as follows:

    (3.5)

    Where, KF and n are physical constants of Freundlich adsorption isotherm. Also, KF

    and n are indicators of adsorption capacity and adsorption intensity, respectively. The

    slope and intercept of linear Freundlich equation are equal to n and ln KF,

    respectively. If the n value is in the range of 0 < n < 1, it indicates a favorable

    adsorption (M.Tukaram Bai et al, 2010).

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    28/61

    14

    3.5 Biosorption Thermodynamics

    The thermodynamics studies were carried out by conducting batch biosorption

    experiments with different initial zinc concentrations and temperature. Samples were

    taken at constant periods and analyzed for their zinc concentration. The values of the

    thermodynamic parameters such as H, G and S describing zinc ions

    biosorption by PSAC, were calculated using the thermodynamic equations described

    below. The biosorption process can be regarded as a heterogeneous and reversible

    process at equilibrium.

    The thermodynamic parameter such as the Gibbs free energy change

    indicates the degree of spontaneity of a process. A higher and negative value

    indicates a more energetically favorable process. Therefore, it can be used to evaluate

    the thermodynamic feasibility of the adsorption of zinc ions on PSAC. The Gibbs

    free energy change of the sorption reaction is given by equation 3.6 and 3.7.

    (3.6)

    RT

    H

    R

    SK

    ln (3.7)

    where

    = standard free energy, kJ/mol

    = enthalpy, kJ/mol

    T= temperature, K= entropy, kJ/mol.K

    K = equilibrium constant from Langmuir isotherm

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    29/61

    15

    CHAPTER 4

    4RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    4.1 The Effect of initial zinc ion concentration

    The effect of initial zinc ion concentration on biosorption was studied at temperature30 C, 40 C, 50C and 60 C at pH 5 with a constant agitation speed of 220 rpm.

    Figure 4.1 shows that all the curves have the same pattern for the initial zinc ion

    concentration against the adsorption percentage, where the adsorption percentage

    declined as the initial zinc ion concentration increased. The figure 4.1 and 4.2 shows

    that the metal uptake increases and the percentage adsorption of zinc decreases with

    increase in metal ion concentration at different range of temperature.

    The increment of metal uptake was tabulated in table 4.1 at different range of

    temperature and initial concentration of zinc ions. However, the percentage

    adsorption of zinc ions on PSAC was decreased from 73.1 % to 36.12 %

    (temperature 30 C). Though an increase in metal uptake was observed, the decrease

    in percentage adsorption may be attributed to lack of sufficient surface area to

    accommodate much more metal ions available in the solution. The percentage

    adsorption at higher concentration levels shows a decreasing trend whereas the

    equilibrium uptake of zinc displays an opposite trend.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    30/61

    16

    At lower concentrations, all zinc ions present in solution could interact with

    the binding sites and thus the percentage adsorption was higher than those at higher

    zinc ion concentrations. At higher concentrations, lower adsorption yield is due to

    the saturation of adsorption sites. As a result, the purification yield can be increased

    by diluting the aqueous solutions containing high metal ion concentrations.

    Figure 4.1: The Sorption Capacity for biosorption of Zinc () ions on PSAC at

    different temperatures

    Table 4.1: Sorption Capacity at different temperatures and initial concentration

    Varies

    Ci, mg/L

    qe , mg g-1

    Temperature, C30 40 50 60

    10 3.248 1.062 1.237 3.712

    20 5.654 3.837 3.849 6.033

    30 7.884 4.606 3.996 7.568

    40 10.560 4.812 3.988 9.336

    50 11.632 5.217 4.940 9.520

    70 17.484 5.940 5.664 10.632

    90 20.272 6.532 5.864 12.216

    120 25.188 6.776 6.184 11.812150 27.088 8.204 5.520 15.120

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    31/61

    17

    Figure 4.2: The Adsorption capacity of Zinc () ions during the biosorption process

    by PSAC

    4.2 The Effect of Temperature

    Temperature is found to be an important parameter for the sorption of zinc ions

    dealing with the thermodynamics of the biosorption process. The studies on

    biosorption of Zinc with PSAC were carried out with four different temperatures

    which were 30 C, 40 C, 50 C and 60 C. It is directly related to the kinetic energy

    of the zinc ions. Temperature changes will affect a number of factors which are

    important in heavy metal ion biosorption. Some of the factors include: (Sag, Y. and T.

    Kutsal, 2000.)

    a. The stability of the metal ion species initially placed in solution.b. The stability of micro organism-metal complex depending on the biosorption

    sites;

    c. The effect of temperature on the microorganism cell wall configuration;d. The ionization of chemical moieties on the cell wall.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    32/61

    18

    The both figure 4.1 and 4.2 at the pre shows the relationship of temperature

    with adsorption percentage and the sorption capacity based on the initial zinc ions

    metal concentration. Based on the Figure 4.1 it can be seen that for the adsorption of

    zinc ions initially the uptake capacity increases in a linear way with rising

    equilibrium concentration. Uptake capacity is eventually limited by the fixed number

    of uptake active sites on the adsorbent and a resulting plateau can be observed. This

    plateau would represent the maximum uptake capacity of the adsorbent for zinc ions

    at different temperature values. From the below table 4.2 it was found that qmax for

    zinc ions are 52.083, 8.503, 7.032 and 13.00 mgg1

    at temperature values of 303, 313,

    323 and 333 K, respectively.

    Table 4.2: Freundlich and Langmuir model parameters for biosorption of zinc (11)

    with original PSAC

    Temperature

    ( K )Langmuir Isotherm Freundlich Isotherm

    b (L/mg) qmax

    (mg/g)

    R2

    RL Kf(mg/g) n R2

    303

    313

    323

    333

    0.0163

    0.118

    0.137

    0.220

    52.083

    8.503

    7.032

    13.000

    0.9576

    0.9775

    0.9513

    0.9635

    0.229 -0.847

    0.074 -0.735

    0.033 -0.578

    0.021-0.263

    1.153

    1.093

    1.041

    1.574

    0.7075

    0.4898

    0.5438

    0.0307

    0.9739

    0.8759

    0.8009

    0.9652

    The initial zinc concentration may provide a driving force to overcome all

    mass transfer resistances between the adsorbent and the adsorption medium. Hence

    higher sorption capacities were obtained at higher initial concentrations of zinc point

    up by T.Fan (2001). Figure 4.1 shows that the uptake capacity of zinc ions increases

    as the temperature increases.

    The entire experimental results for organic reaction of biosorption indicated

    that adsorption of zinc ions was endothermic (29.72 kJ/mol). The increment in

    temperature may lead to a swelling effect within the internal structure of adsorbent

    enabling metal ions to penetrate further (Ozer, 2001). The rise in temperature wouldalso cause a rise in kinetic energy of sorbent particles.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    33/61

    19

    First, the collision frequency between sorbent and sorbate would increase,

    this results in the enhanced sorption on to the surface of the sorbent. Second, at high

    temperature due to bond rupture of functional groups on adsorbent surface there may

    be an increase in number of active sorption sites, which may also lead to enhance

    sorption with the rise in temperature (E.Malkoc et al., 2005)

    4.3 Adsorption Equilibrium Models

    The biosorption of Zn (II) was investigated as a function of concentration at different

    temperatures in the range of 10

    200 mgL using 0.2495 mg to 0.2505 mg of

    adsorbent, 250 mL of adsorbate solution, and 24 hours shaking time at a shaking

    speed of 220 rpm. The results indicated that the uptake of metal ions was above 60%

    at low adsorbate concentrations (1090 mgL1

    ) and 6 % 59 % at high

    concentrations (100200 mgL1). The equilibrium data for the adsorption of Zn(II)

    on original Palm shell activated carbon (PSAC) was tested with two adsorption

    isotherm models (Langmuir, and Freundlich, isotherm) among which two models

    were found to be suitable for the Zn(II) adsorption.

    The Langmuir isotherm model applied to the estimation of maximum

    adsorption capacity corresponding to complete monolayer coverage on the PSAC

    surface. The equilibrium models are extensively used to investigate the amounts of

    zinc ions absorbed by a certain PSAC. The distribution of zinc ions between solution

    and PSAC is a measure of the position of equilibrium and can be expressed by one or

    more isotherms. The equilibrium distribution is important in determining the

    maximum biosorption capacity. The Langmuir isotherm model was chosen toestimate the maximum adsorption capacity corresponding to complete monolayer

    coverage on the biomass surface. The Freundlich model was chosen to estimate the

    adsorption intensity of the biosorbent towards the biomass.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    34/61

    20

    4.3.1 Langmuir Isotherm

    The isotherm represents the equilibrium relationship between the metal

    uptake by the adsorbent and the final metal concentration in the aqueous phase,

    showing the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent. The pH value of 5.0 was chosen as

    the experimental condition for the determination of adsorption isotherms. All the

    datas were fitted into Langmuir isotherm for all the four diffe rent temperature. The

    Figure 4.3, Figure 4.4, Figure 4.5 and Figure 4.6 were generated from the Langmuir

    isotherm respectively. The best-fit equilibrium model was determined based on the

    linear regression correlation coefficient R2.

    Figure 4.3: Langmuir isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC at

    T = 30C

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    35/61

    21

    Figure 4.4: Langmuir isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC at

    T= 40C

    Figure 4.5: Langmuir isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC at

    T = 50C

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    36/61

    22

    Figure 4.6: Langmuir isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC at

    T= 60C

    Here we consider Langmuir model with its main assumptions: (Leszek Czepirksi et

    al.)

    a. Adsorption only takes place only at specific localized sites on the surface andthe saturation coverage corresponds to complete occupancy of these sites.

    b. Each site can accommodate one and only one molecular or atom.c. The surface is energetically homogeneous, and there is no interaction

    between neighboring and adsorbed molecules or atoms.

    d. There are no phase transitions.

    The RL values calculated were between 0.229 and 0.847 (Table 4.2)

    indicating highly favorable biosorption of Zn (II) on PSAC for temperature 303 K.

    Overall, the entire inorganic reactions for different temperature is favorable and by

    referring to the RL values in table 4.2, the biosorption of Zn (II) at temperature 333 K

    gives the lowest range of RL, (0.021-0.263). This is due to the high temperature,

    where the low range of RL value probably caused by a change in the texture of the

    PSAC and a loss in the sorption capacity due to material deterioration. (Volesky,

    2003)

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    37/61

    23

    The validity of Langmuir isotherm suggests that adsorption is a monolayer

    process and adsorption of all species requires equal activation energy. As Table 4.2

    shows, b increases with increasing of temperature, indicating that adsorption of zinc

    ions onto PSAC surfaces increases with temperature. The results also implied that the

    affinity of the binding sites increased with temperature. (Moradi et al. ,2011) page.

    4.3.2 Freundlich Isotherm

    The results of present study indicates that the Freundlich model does not fit the

    experimental data since the R2

    values were 0.9739, 0.8759, 0.8009 and 0.9652,

    respectively, for 303, 313, 323 and 333 K. Below are the figure 4.7, figure 4.8, figure

    4.9 and figure 4.10 shows has the n value in the range of 0 < n < 1 for the biosorption

    of zinc ions using original PSAC. Thus, the adsorptions for different temperature

    with the variations of initial concentration of zinc are favorable.

    Figure 4.7: Freundlich isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC at

    T= 30 C

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    38/61

    24

    Figure 4.8: Freundlich isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC at

    T= 40 C

    Figure 4.9: Freundlich isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC at

    T= 50 C

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    39/61

    25

    Figure 4.10: Freundlich isotherm for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC

    at T= 60 C

    Freundlich isotherm does not describe the saturation behavior of adsorbents.

    Regarding the coefficients of Freundlich model, KF increased with temperature,

    revealing that adsorption capacity increased with temperature. Like KF, n increased

    with temperature as well. Since all n values obtained from the isotherms exceeded

    unity, the zinc ions were favorably adsorbed onto PSAC surfaces. The highest values

    of n were 0.7075 at 303K.These data indicate favorable adsorption. Refer to table 4.2.

    For all cases, the Langmuir equation fits the experimental data better than the

    Freundlich equation. This isotherm does not predict any saturation of the adsorbent

    by the sorbate. Instead, infinite surface coverage is predicted, indicating multilayer

    sorption on the surface.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    40/61

    26

    4.4 Thermodynamics properties for biosorption of Zinc() by originalPSAC

    In the present study, thermodynamic parameters were obtained by varying

    temperature conditions over the range 303-333 K and varying initial concentrations

    by keeping other variables constant. Thermodynamic parameters were calculated to

    confirm the adsorption nature of the present study. The thermodynamic constants,

    free energy change G, enthalpy change, H and entropy change, S were

    calculated to evaluate the thermodynamic feasibility of the process and to confirm

    the nature of the biosorption process. Those parameters were evaluated using the

    equation 3.6 and 3.7.

    Table 4.3: Values of 1/T and ln b for the Gibbs Energy Graph

    T (C)Temperature

    (K)1/T K ln K

    30 303 0.0033 0.8493 -0.1633

    40 313 0.0032 0.9999 -0.0001

    50 323 0.0031 0.9656 -0.0350

    60 333 0.0030 2.8547 1.0490

    Figure 4.11:Thermodynamics parameters (The Gibbs Energy) for biosorption

    of Zinc () ions on original PSAC

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    41/61

    27

    The thermodynamic parameters of enthalpy energy, H and entropy energy,

    S were obtained from the slope and intercept of vant Hoff plot of ln K against 1/T

    (Fig. 4.11 and table 4.3). The negative G values for Zn (II) at various temperatures

    approved the adsorption processes were spontaneous, and the values ofG (Table

    4.4) decreased with an increase in temperature, indicated that the spontaneous nature

    of adsorption of Zn (II) were inversely proportional to the temperature. Enhancement

    of adsorption capacity at higher temperatures may be attributed to the enlargement of

    pore size and activation of the PSAC surface.

    The biosorption process at temperature 303 K gives a positive value of Gibbs

    energy of 0.8314 kJ/mol tabulated at table 4.4. The author thinks that the positive

    value of Gibbs energy was because the process was non-spontaneous enough to give

    a negative value of Gibbs energy.

    Table 4.4: Gibbs Energy for Biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC

    Based from Figure 4.11, the enthalpy and entropy were evaluated by

    multiplying the gas constant, R referring to the equation 3.7. Therefore, the values of

    the entropy and enthalpy were 95.34 J/mol.K and 29.72 kJ/mol. The positive value of

    enthalpy energy H, 29.72 kJ/mol illuminated the endothermic nature of zinc ions

    biosorption.

    The thermodynamic parameters for the biosorption of zinc ions using original

    PSAC were tabularize in table 4.5. The positive value of entropy energy S, 0.095

    kJ/mol.K suggested the increase randomness at the solid or solution interface during

    the biosorption of zinc ions on PSAC.

    Temperature

    (K)

    G

    (kJ/mol)

    Process

    303 0.8314 Non feasible

    313 -0.12 feasible

    323 -1.08 feasible

    333 -2.03 feasible

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    42/61

    28

    As the temperature increases, the Gibbs free energy decreases with more

    negative values, which it indicates the degree of spontaneity of the biosorption

    process, and the more negative values reflect a more energetically favorable

    biosorption process of zinc ions onto original PSAC. In addition, from the table 4.5

    below, the Langmuir constant, b (L/mg) is proportional to the temperature, which

    eventually gives a negative declining value of Gibbs energy. Since Gibbs energy

    related to the spontaneous of the biosorption process, thus at higher temperature of

    333 K the degree of spontaneity was higher due to the kinetic movement of the

    PSAC and zinc ions increases as well.

    Table 4.5: The thermodynamics parameters for the entire Biosoprtion of Zinc ()

    ions on original PSAC

    Temperature,

    Kb (L/mg) R

    2

    H

    (kJ/mol)

    S

    (kJ/mol)

    G

    (kJ/mol)

    303 0.0163

    0.6627 29.72 0.095

    0.8314

    313 0.1180 -0.12

    323 0.1370 -1.08

    333 0.2200 -2.03

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    43/61

    29

    4.5 Comparison of biosorption of Zinc(II) with different AdsorbentsReported in Literature

    The adsorption capacities of the adsorbents for the biosorption of Zinc(II) have been

    compared with those of other adsorbents reported in literature and the values of

    adsorption capacities have been presented in Table 4.6. The values reported in the

    form of monolayer adsorption capacity. The experimental data of the present

    investigations are comparable with the reported values. From the Table 4.6, it is

    observed that palm shell activated carbon gives the highest adsorption capacity

    compared to the other biosorbents. Another thing, the author thinks that the high

    adsorption capacity for PSAC was due to the parameter of pH and agitation speed of

    220 rpm during the biosorption of zinc ions.

    Table 4.6: Zinc() adsorption capacities (qm) of agricultural waste materials

    Biosorbent qm, mg/g Equilibrium Model Reference

    PSAC 52.08 Freudlich,Langmuir Present Study

    Sugar beet pulp 35.60 Freudlich Pehlivan et al.,2006

    Almond husk activated carbon 35.34 Freudlich,Langmuir Hasar et al.

    Bengal gram husk 33.81 Freudlich,Langmuir Saeed et al.Cassava waste 11.06 - Abia et al.

    Peanut hulls 9.00 - Brown at al.

    Coir Fibers 8.60 - Shukla et al.

    Pecan Shell carbon 7.38 Freundlich Bansode et al

    Banana peel 5.80 Freundlich Annadurai et al.

    Barlew straw 5.30 - Larsen & Schierup

    Orange peel 5.25 Freundlich Annadurai et al.

    Cocoa shell 2.92 - Meunier et al.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    44/61

    30

    4.6 Comparison of pH changes for biosorption of Zinc() with differentadsorbent were revised

    The biosorption of Zinc() ions with PSAC was carried out under pH 5. Based, on

    the literature review studies, it was observed that the optimum pH range were 4 to 6

    to achieve the maximum sorption capacity. The Table 4.9 indicates the optimum pH

    for biosorption of Zinc() ions using different biosorbents. It is well known that the

    pH value of the medium affects the solubility of Zinc ions and the concentration of

    the counter ions, on the functional groups of the PSAC cell walls. A PSAC presents a

    high content of ionizable groups (carboxyl groups) on the cell wall polysaccharides,

    which makes it very liable to the influence of the pH value. As shown in Table 4.7

    the uptake of free ionic zinc depends on pH. The biosorption of metallic zinc ion was

    observed to increase with increase in pH up to a value of 6.

    These functional groups from PSAC carry negative charges that allow the

    functional cell wall components to be potential binding sites for cations (P.Yin et al,

    1999). Since high proton concentration at lower pH, zinc ions uptake was decreased

    because of the positive charge density on metal binding sites. Namely hydrogen ionseffectively compete with zinc ions to bind the sites. The negative charge density on

    the PSAC surface increases with increasing in pH due to deprotonation of the metal

    binding sites.

    Table 4.7: The biosorption of Zinc() in different pH with different biosorbents

    Biosorbent qmax ( mg/g) pH Reference

    Syzygium cumini L. 35.84 6.0 N.Rakesh (2006)

    A.indica bark 33.49 6.0 King et al.

    PSAC 52.08 5.0 Present study

    Tectona grandis 16.42 5.0 Prasanna Kumar

    Activated carbon 31.11 4.5 Mohan et al.

    Sargassum sp. 24.35 4.5 Erteves et al.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    45/61

    31

    CHAPTER 5

    5CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    5.1 Conclusion

    The current study shows that the biomass of original Palm Shell Activated Carbon

    was used as effective biosorbents for the biosorption of Zn (II) from aqueous solution.

    The specific objectives of this study had been accomplished by carrying out the

    experiment according to the methodology, and then the thermodynamics parameters

    were evaluated based on the tabulated datas. The initial concentrations of zinc affect

    the sorption capacity of PSAC. The sorption capacity is relative to the initial

    concentration. The highest sorption capacity was achieved at temperature 303 K.Zinc biosorption by original PSAC was fitted well with the Langmuir and Freundlich

    adsorption isotherms equations in the studied metal concentration range. The

    thermodynamic parameters include H, G and S. Those parameters were

    strongly affected by the temperature and initial concentration of zinc ions. The effect

    of temperature clearly observed during the computation of Gibbs free energy, where

    the temperature is proportional to the Gibbs energy. The positive value of H

    (29.72 kJ/mol) indicates an endothermic process. Hence S (0.095 kJ/mol) has to be

    positive value as well.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    46/61

    32

    5.2 Recommendations

    The entire studies of thermodynamics properties for biosorption of zinc metal using

    original palm shell activated carbon was successfully accomplished. As a conclusion,

    the highest adsorption capacity (73.1 % ) for biosorption of zinc metal using original

    PSAC was achieved at temperature 303 K with the initial concentration of 10 mg/L.

    For this present study, the Gibbs energy obtained at temperature 303 K is a positive

    value, where the reaction is not spontaneous. So, for further studies in future, it is

    recommended to decrease the initial concentration of zinc metal, to attain an

    adsorption capacity of above 90% or even up to 100 % and to carry out at the same

    temperature again. In addition, other parameters can be adjusted to obtain a higher

    adsorption capacity.

    Since, this study of using original PSAC manage to obtain adsorption

    capacity of 73.1%, it is a good option to replace the original PSAC with the

    biomodified PSAC in future studies, so that the sorption capacity of zinc can be

    increase. Furthermore, base on the literature review studies and present work, at pH

    range of 5 to 6 the biosoprtion of zinc will be at the optimum stage. Hence, it isanother alternative way to increase the sorption capacity of zinc by increasing the pH

    value to 5.5 or 6.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    47/61

    33

    REFERENCE

    A.K. Bhattacharya, S. M. (2006). Adsorption of Zn(II) from aqueous solution by

    using different adsorbents.Chemical Engineering Journal 123 , 43-51.

    Akar, S. T. (2006). Zn(II) biosorption properties of Botrytis cinerea biomass.Journal of

    Hazardous Materials B131 , 137145.

    Aroua and Gulnaziya Issabayeva (2011). Removal of Copper and Zinc Ions onto

    Biomodified Palm Shell Activated Carbon. World Academy of Science, Engineering

    and Technology 76, 259-262.

    Bamidele I. Olu-Owolabia, a. E. (2010). Kinetic and thermodynamics of the removal of

    Zn2+

    and Cu2+

    from aqueous.Journal of Hazardous Materials 184 , 731738.

    Chen, J. W. (2009). Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future.

    Biotechnology Advances 27, 195-226.

    Ismael Alejandro Aguayo-Villarreala,Adrin Bonilla-Petriciolet ,Virginia Hernndez-

    Montoyaa ,Miguel A. Montes-Mornc, and Hilda E. Reynel-Avila (2011). Batch and

    column studies of Zn2+

    removal from aqueous solution using chicken.Chemical

    Engineering Journal 167, 67-76.

    Evina Katsou, S. M. (2010). Examination of zinc uptake in a combined system using

    sludge, minerals.Journal of Hazardous Materials 182 , 27-38.

    FORSTER, D. J. (2003). Biosorbents for Metal ions. United Kingdom,UK: Taylor &

    Francis e-Library.

    G. Kalyani, G. B. (2009). Equilibrium And Kinetic Studies On Biosorption Of Zinc

    Onto Gallus Domesticus Shell Powder.ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied

    Sciences .

    Goldberg, S. (1995). Adsorption Models Incorporated into Chemical Equilibrium

    Models. USA: Chemical Equilibrium and Reaction Models, SSSA Special.

    Himanshu Agarwal, D. S. (2010).Removal Of Mercury From Wastewater.Electronic

    Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry , 1551-1558.

    Ho, Y.-S. (2006). Isotherms for the Sorption of Lead onto Peat:Comparison of Linear

    and Non-Linear Methods. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies Vol. 15 , 81-86

    Innocent OBOH, E. A. (2009). Biosorption of Heavy Metal Ions from Aqueous

    Solutions Using a Biomaterial.Leonardo Journal of Sciences , 58-65.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    48/61

    34

    Jin-Ho Joo 1, S. H.-E. (2010). Comparative study of biosorption of Zn by Pseudomonas

    aeruginosa.International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 64 , 734-741.

    Jonathan Fabriato and Aline Nathasiah (2009). Equilibrium and kinetic studies in

    adsorption of heavy metals using biosorbent:.Journal of Hazardous Materials 162 ,

    616645

    K.S. Rao1, M. M. (2010). Review on cadmium removal from aqueous solutions.

    International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technolog Vol 2 , 81-103.

    M.Tukaram Bai, K.. (September,2010). Equilibrium, kinetics and Thermodynamic

    studies on biosorption of copper and zinc from mixed solution by Erythitina

    variegata orientalis leaf powder.Indian Journal of Chemical Technology , 346-355.

    Mubashir Hussain Nasir, R. N. (2007). Efficacy of modified distillation sludge of rose

    (Rosa centifolia) petals.Journal of Hazardous Materials 147, 10061014.

    N. A. Adesola Babarinde, O. O. (November, 2007). Isotherm and thermodynamic

    studies of the biosorption of Copper ions by Erythrodontium barteri. International

    Journal of Physical Sciences Vol. 2 , 300-304.

    N. Gamze Turan, S. E. (2011). Adsorption of copper and zinc ions on illite:

    Determination of the optimal conditions. Applied Clay Science 52 , 392-399.

    N.A. Adesola Babarinde, P. J. (May-June 2008 ). Isotherm and Thermodynamic Studies

    of the Biosorption of Zinc (II). The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology , 196-

    202.

    P. King. (2008). Biosorption of zinc from aqueous solution using Azadirachta.Journal

    of Hazardous Materials 152 , 324329.

    P.Venkateswarlu, G. V. (September 9, 2008). Biosorption of Zn(II) from an aqueous

    solution by Erythrina variegata orientalis leaf powder.International Journal of

    Physical Sciences Vol. 3 , 197-204.

    Ramiro J.E. Martinsa, R. P. (2004). Cadmium(II) and zinc(II) adsorption by the aquatic.

    Water Research 38 , 693-699.

    Salem M. Hamza Hanan, F. A. (2010). Optimization of Cadmium, Zinc and Copper

    biosorption in an aqueous solution by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Journal of

    American Science , 6-12.

    Shuguang Lua, S. W. (2007). Effective removal of zinc ions from aqueous. Journal of

    Hazardous Materials 149 , 208217.

    Sisca O. Lesmanaa, N. F. (2009). Studies on potential applications of biomass for the

    separation of heavy metals.Biochemical Engineering Journal 44 , 1941.

    Tarun Kumar Naiya, P. C. (2009). Saw dust and neem bark as low-cost naturalbiosorbent for adsorptive. Chemical Engineering Journal 148 , 68-79.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    49/61

    35

    Thomas Anish Johnson, N. J. (September,2008). Agricultural and agro processing

    wastes as low cost asdorbents for metal removal from wastewater.Journal of

    Scientific & Industrial Research , 647-658.

    Y. Prasanna Kumar, P. K. (2006). Comparison for adsorption modelling of copper and

    zinc from aqueous.Journal of Hazardous Materials B137 , 12461251.

    Yun Zhanga, Y. L.-q.-j.-y.-F. (2010). Characterization and adsorption mechanism of

    Zn2+ removal by PVA/EDTA resin.Journal of Hazardous Materials 178 , 1046

    1054.

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    50/61

    36

    APPENDICES

    APPENDIX A1: Graphs

    Temperature 30 C

    Figure B1.1: Percentage uptake of biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC

    (T = 30 C)

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    51/61

    37

    Figure C1.2: The qegraph for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC

    (T = 30 C)

    Figure D1.3: Thermodynamic parameter for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original

    PSAC (T = 30 C)

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    52/61

    38

    Parameter: Temperature 40 C

    Figure E1.4: Percentage uptake of biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC

    (T = 40 C)

    Figure F1.5: The qegraph for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC (T = 40 C)

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    53/61

    39

    Figure G1.6: Thermodynamic parameter for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original

    PSAC(T = 40 C)

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    54/61

    40

    Parameter: Temperature 50 C

    Figure H1.7: Percentage uptake of biosorption of Zinc () ions on original

    PSAC(T = 50 C)

    Figure I1.8:The qegraph for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC

    (T = 50 C)

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    55/61

    41

    Figure J1.9: Thermodynamic parameter for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original

    PSAC(T = 50 C)

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    56/61

    42

    Parameter: Temperature 60 C

    Figure K1.10: Percentage uptake of Zinc () ions on original PSAC (T = 60 C)

    Figure L1.11: The qegraph for biosorption of Zinc () ions on original PSAC

    (T = 60 C)

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    57/61

    43

    Figure M1.12: Thermodynamic parameter for biosorption of Zinc () ions on PSAC

    (T = 60 C)

    Figure N1.13: Calibration graph for biosorption Zinc () ions on original PSAC

    (T = 60 C)

    R = 1

    0200000

    400000

    600000

    800000

    1000000

    1200000

    1400000

    0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000 1400000

    Correctedi

    ntensity

    Net intensity

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    58/61

    44

    APPENDIX O2: Tables

    Table P2.1: The Calibration table for the biosorption of Zinc () ions on PSAC

    Table Q2.2: Sorption Capacity for different temperatures as initial

    concentration varies

    Solution Net intensity Corrected intensity

    Blank solution 59.9 59.9

    Standard

    1:10ppm

    59327.6 59267.7

    Standard

    3:50ppm

    288304.8 288244.9

    Standard

    3:100ppm

    594518.7 594458.8

    Standard

    3:150ppm

    914531.3 914471.4

    Standard

    3:200ppm

    1238441.2 1238381.2

    qe , mg g-1

    Ci, mg/L Temperature, C

    30 40 50 60

    10 3.248 1.062 1.237 3.712

    20 5.654 3.837 3.849 6.03330 7.884 4.606 3.996 7.568

    40 10.560 4.812 3.988 9.336

    50 11.632 5.217 4.940 9.520

    70 17.484 5.940 5.664 10.632

    90 20.272 6.532 5.864 12.216

    120 25.188 6.776 6.184 11.812

    150 27.088 8.204 5.520 15.120

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    59/61

    45

    Table R2.3: Adsorption capacity for different Temperature as initial concentration

    varies

    Adsorption %

    Concentration,ppm Temperature,C

    30 40 50 60

    10 73.1 66.94 57.15 72.89

    20 65.89 60.45 63 64.05

    30 63.23 58.42 59.28 56.33

    40 59.57 56.59 53.15 53

    50 59.33 56.07 52.23 43.64

    70 62.35 40.1 42.92 35.95

    90 54.56 26.63 31.93 31.23

    120 48.89 26.45 26.62 21.38

    150 46.54 26.22 9.24 14.74

    170 46.39 23.75 8.73 15.74

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    60/61

    46

    APPENDIX S: Calculations for thermodynamic parameters

    Sample Calculation

    Temperature 303 K

    1. Langmuir Isotherm

    From the Figure 4.3 the equation obtain from the graph is

    Compare the above equation with equation 4.1:

    From the comparison we can evaluate the b and qm value.

    Gradient from the figure 4.3,

    ;

    Then evaluate the b value,

    Next, evaluate the dimensionless equilibrium parameter, RL from equation 4.2

    Co = 11.259 mg/L

    b = 0.0163 L/mg

  • 8/2/2019 biosorption fyp updated2

    61/61

    47

    2. Freundlich Isotherm

    From the Figure 4.3 the equation obtain from the graph is

    Compare the above equation with equation 4.4

    From the comparison of the two equations, need to evaluate the KF and n value.

    Freundlich constant of adsorption intensity, n = 0.7075

    Freundlich constant of adsorption capacity, KF =

    so, KF = 1.153 mg/g

    Thermodynamics Parameter

    The parameter consists of Gibbs energy, entropy and enthalpy.

    The Figure 4.11 was used to evaluate the above parameters. Figure 4.11 was plotted

    according to the equation 4.6 :

    This equation was obtained from the figure 4.11

    Thus, we can evaluate the entropy and enthalpy.

    Using gas constant, R = 8.314 J/mol.K