Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

32
Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs Thu, Jan 18, 2013

description

Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs. Thu, Jan 18, 2013. Modelling of Signalling Pathways. Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221. 1) How do the magnitudes of signal output and signal duration depend on the kinetic properties of pathway components?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Page 1: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3

V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Thu, Jan 18, 2013

Page 2: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 2

Modelling of Signalling Pathways

Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

1) How do the magnitudes of signal output and signal duration depend on the kinetic properties of pathway components?(2) Can high signal amplification be coupled with fast signaling?

(3) How are signaling pathways designed to ensure that they are safely off in the absence of stimulation, yet display high signal amplification following receptor activation?(4) How can different agonists stimulate the same pathway in distinct ways to elicit a sustained or a transient response, which can have dramatically different consequences?

Page 3: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 3

Linear Response

E.g., protein synthesis and degradation (see lecture V10)

S = signal (e.g., concentration of mRNA)

R = response (e.g., concentration of a protein)

SRSR

At steady state (which implies S = const):

=>

0 1 20

1

2

S

RS

S

RSS linearly dependent on Sk0 = 1, k1 = k2 = 2

Page 4: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 4

S

RP

SS

phosphorylation/dephosphorylation

„forward“: R is converted to phosphorylated form RP„backward“: RP can be dephosphorylated again to R

RRPSTRRPST

S + R => RP

RP => R + Twith Rtot = R + RP

Find steady state for RP: linear until saturation

0.01 0.1 1 10 1000.01

0.1

1

Rtot = 1, S0 = 1

Output T proportional to RP level:

phosphorylated form

Page 5: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 - WS 12/13 5

Enzyme: Michaelis-Menten-kinetics

Reaction rate:

Steady state:

SE

EST

kon koff

Total amount of enzyme is constant:

=>

turnover:

Page 6: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 - WS 12/13 6

The MM-equation

Effective turnover according to MM:

Pro: • analytical formula for turnover• curve can be easily interpreted: Vmax, KM

• enzyme concentration can be ignored

Cons: less kinetic information kon, koff, ET => Vmax, KM

Page 7: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 7

Sigmoidal Characteristics with MM kinetics

0 1 2 30

2

4

6

8

10

RRPSTRRPST Same topology as before with Michaelis-Menten kinetics for phosphorylation and dephosphorylation.

Quadratic equation for RP

S

RP

SS

Rt = 10, R0 = RP0 = 1, k1 = k2 = 1

=> sigmoidal characteristics (threshold behavior)often found in signalling

cascades

this means that S = Rt - RP KM = R0

Page 8: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 8

Graded Response

0 1 20

1

2

S

RS

S

S

RP

SS

0.01 0.1 1 10 1000.01

0.1

1

0 1 2 30

2

4

6

8

10

S

RP

SS

Linear, hyperbolic, and sigmoidal characteristic give the same steady state response independent of the previous history=> no hysteresis

BUT: In fast time-dependent scenarios,delay may lead to a modified response

Page 9: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 9

Time-dependent Sigmoidal Response

Direct implementation:RRPSTRRPST

Parameters: k1 = 1 (mol s)–1, k2 = 1 s–1, R0 = RP0 = 1 molInitial conditions: R = 10 mol, RP = 0

Time courses for S = 1, 1.5, and 2,RP(0) = 0:

equilibrium is reachedfaster for stronger signal

t

RP(t

)

Page 10: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 10

Adaption - „sniffer“SRXSRX Linear response modulated by a second species X

Steady state: Rss independent of S

S

k1 = 30, k2 = 40, k3 = k4 = 5

0 1 2 3 4 50

1

2 S

R

X

R changes transiently when S changes, then goes back to its basal level.found in smell, vision, chemotaxis, …

Note: response strength ΔR depends on rate of change of S.=> non-monotonous relation for R(S)

Page 11: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 11

Positive Feedback

Feedback via R and EP=> high levels of R will stay

"one-way switch" via bifurcation

Found in processes that are "final":frog oocyte maturation, apoptosis, …

Page 12: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 12

Mutual Inhibition - Toggle Switch

Sigmoidal "threshold" in E <=> EP leads to bistable response (hysteresis): toggle switchConverts continuous external stimulus into two well defined stable states:• lac operon in bacteria• activation of M-phase promoting factor in frog eggs

Page 13: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 13

Negative Feedback

S controls the "demand" for R

=> homeostasis found in biochemical pathways, no transient changes in R for steps in S (cf. "sniffer")

Page 14: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 14

Negative Feedback with Delay

Cyclic activation X => YP => RP => X=> Oscillations (in a range of S)

Proposed mechanism for circadian clocks

Page 15: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 15

Circadian Clocks

Ko & Takahashi Hum Mol Genet 15, R271 (2006)

CK1: casein kinase

Rev-erb, ROR: retinoic acid-related orphan nuclear receptors

Cdg: clock-controlled gene(s)

Page 16: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 16

Substrate-Depletion Oscillations

R is produced in an autocatalytic reaction from X, finally depleting X…

Similar to Lotka-Volterra system (autocatalysis for X, too):

Page 17: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 17

The Cell Cycle

Cell division(cytokinesis)

DNA separatio

n(mitosis)

DNA replication

cell growt

h

M-phase

S-phaseG2-phase

G1

-phase

When to take the next step???

Page 18: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 18

Cell Cycle Control

Page 19: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 19

Cell Cycle Control System

Tyson et al, Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

cdc = "cell division cycle"

Page 20: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 20

Feedback loops control cell cycle

Page 21: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 21

G1 => S — Toggle Switch

Mutual inhibition between Cdk1-CycB and CKI(cyclin kinase inhibitor)

Tyson et al, Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

Page 22: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 22

Mutual Inhibition

???

Assume: CycB:Cdk1:CKI is stable <=> dissociation is very slow

=> same topology <=> same bistable behavior (?)

Page 23: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 23

Rate Equations: Toggle Switch

A XR1

R2

R3

R4

Stoichiometric matrix"(C)" = catalyst

R1 R2 R3 R4

A –1

S (C)

R 1 –1 (C)

E (C) –1 1

EP 1 –1

X 1

Page 24: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 24

Rate Equations: G1/S ModuleR1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6

CycB –1

Cdk1 –1

CycB:Cdk1 1 –1 (C) 1

CKI –1 –1 1 1

CKI:P3 1 –1

CKI:P3 –1

CycB:Cdk1:CKI

1 -1

R1 R2

R3

R4R5

R6

Page 25: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 25

Comparison: Matrices

A XR1

R2

R3

R4

R1 R2 R3 R4

A –1

S (C)

R 1 –1 (C)

E (C) –1 1

EP 1 –1

X 1

R1 R2

R3

R4R5

Difference: catalysts vs. substrates

R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6

CycB –1

Cdk1 –1

CycB:Cdk1 1 –1 (C) 1

CKI –1 –1 1 1

CKI:P3 1 –1

CKI:P3 –1

CycB:Cdk1:CKI

1 -1

R6

Page 26: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 26

Comparison: Equations

A XR1

R2

R3

R4

R1

R2

R3

R4

R5

Rename species => same rate equations => same behavior

R6

Page 27: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 27

Predicted Behavior: G1 => SSignal: cell growth = concentration of CycB, Cdk1

Response: activity (concentration) of CycB:Cdk1

Toggle switch:=> above critical cell size CycB:Cdk1 activity will switch on

Tyson et al, Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

Page 28: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 28

G2 => M

Toggle switch:• mutual activation between CycB:Cdk1 and Cdc25 (phosphatase that activates the dimer)• mutual inhibition between CycB:Cdk1 and Wee1 (kinase that inactivates the dimer)

=>when the cell grows further during the second gap phase G2, the activity of CycB:Cdk1 will increase by a further step

Tyson et al, Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

Page 29: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 29

M => G1

Negative feedback looposcillator

i) CycB:Cdk1 activates anaphase promoting complex (APC)ii) APC activates Cdc20iii) Cdc20 degrades CycB

Behavior:at a critical cell size CycB:Cdk1 activity increases and decreases again=> at low CycB:Cdk1 level, the G1/S toggle switches off again, => cell cycle completed

Tyson et al, Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

Page 30: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 30

Overall Behavior

Cell divides at size 1.46

=> daughters start growing from size 0.73

=> switches to replication at size 1.25

G1/S toggle => bistability

G2/M toggle => bistability

M/G1 oscillator

Tyson et al, Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

Page 31: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 31

Preventing Cross-Talk

Many enzymes are used in multiple pathways

=> how can different signals cross the same kinase?

=> different temporal signature (slow vs. transient)=> Dynamic modelling!

Page 32: Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Bioinformatics 3 – WS 12/13 V 20 – 32

Summary

Today:

Behavior of cell cycle control circuitry from its modules:two toggle switches + one oscillator=> map biological system onto motif via • stoichiometric matrices • rate equations