Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
-
Upload
chris-daunt -
Category
Documents
-
view
228 -
download
1
Transcript of Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
1/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
2/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
3/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
4/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
5/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
6/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
7/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
8/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
9/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
10/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
11/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
12/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
13/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
14/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
15/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
16/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
17/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
18/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
19/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
20/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
21/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
22/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
23/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
24/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
25/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
26/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
27/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
28/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
29/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
30/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
31/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
32/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
33/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
34/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
35/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
36/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
37/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
38/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
39/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
40/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
41/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
42/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
43/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
44/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
45/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
46/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
47/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
48/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
49/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
50/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
51/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
52/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
53/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
54/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
55/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
56/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
57/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
58/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
59/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
60/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
61/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
62/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
63/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
64/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
65/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
66/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
67/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
68/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
69/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
70/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
71/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
72/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
73/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
74/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
75/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
76/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
77/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
78/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
79/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
80/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
81/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
82/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
83/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
84/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
85/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
86/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
87/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
88/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
89/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
90/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
91/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
92/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
93/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
94/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
95/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
96/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
97/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
98/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
99/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
100/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
101/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
102/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
103/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
104/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
105/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
106/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
107/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
108/237
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
109/237
3.6 TEMPERATURE INDUCED BANDGAP SHRINKAGE
The bandgap of the material will shrink with increases in temperature. This has
been expressed with the Varshni equations for unstrained materials:
( )T T
K E T E g g +
-=
b a
)0()( [3.21]
where Alpha is 4.9E-4 eV/K Beta = 327K.
The change in bandgap energy with temperature has also been extrapolated
for binary data at 300K for lattice matched quaternary material and expressed
as[350]:
)61.041.018.3(101 24 y y xdT
dE g +--= - [3.22]
The change in bandgap for the tensile strained modulator structure was
measured using a micro-photoluminescence setup as a function of temperature
as shown in fig 3.9.
93
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
110/237
=0.432meV/K
Fig 3-10 Temperature dependence of the waveguide composition emission wavelength
The slope of the waveguide composition vs temperature is shown in fig. 3-10.
This is a little higher than the slope shown in the literature[351] at 1.3Q of
0.333meV/K, probably due to the strain in the material. As can be seen in fig
3-10, the material is highly temperature sensitive and linear with respect to
temperature. As the modulator heats up with high optical powers, the bandgap
shrinks and the effective waveguide Q can change from 1.4Q to 1.435Q from
20-70C. Heat crosstalk is an important issue in integrated devices as the laser
benefits from low temperatures with higher gain and lower optical loss, and the
modulator benefits from the higher efficiencies at higher temperatures.
The rise in temperature with bias can be evaluated with the following model:
t d Z P T =D [3.23]
where P d is the power dissipated, and the thermal impedance (Z t) is given by:
94
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
111/237
x p Lwh
Z t )/4ln(
= [3.24]
where h is the height of the substrate, w is the width of the device and L is the length. x is thethermal conductivity[350].
The thermal resistivity of InGaAsP has been given by [350] as:
242.3978.5947.11
y yT -+== x r K cm / W [3.25]
The refractive index of InGaAsP as a function of composition, and temperature
has been extended from a model given by Adachi, and fitted to experimental
data and given by:
-
++
D+
+= )300(1)()()(
)(
21
)()(
2/3
T T
y B z f T E
T E z f y An
oo
o g
g r
e
e [3.26]
where A(y) = 8.616 -3.886y [3.27]
B(y) = 6.621 + 3.461y [3.28]
2112)(
z z z z f
--+-= [3.29]
)(T E E
z g
= [3.30]
o g o T E
E z
D+=
)([3.31]
Although InGaAsP data is difficult to come by, for InP near 300K
o xT e
e 41016.5 - =
1/K [3.32]
95
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
112/237
As one can see, the temperature dependence stems from the bandgap and the
high frequency dielectric constant terms.
3.7 ACCUMULATION OF EFFECTS
The accumulation of the aforementioned field effects and carrier effects are
plotted for a 300mm long device with three different input powers (4.9mW,
11mW, and 15.6mW) under reverse bias.
Fig. 3.11a Change in refractive index as a function of voltage with input optical power 4.9mW T= 16C l = 1555nm
96
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
113/237
Fig. 3.11b Change in refractive index as a function of voltage with input optical power 11mWT = 16C, l = 1555nm
Fig. 3.11c Change in refractive index as a function of voltage with input optical power 15.6mWT = 16C l 1555nm
97
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
114/237
The refractive index change was extracted from the absorption curves (fig. 3.6)
and the output power dc extinction curves (fig. 3.3) using equation 3.2 and
shown as DATA on each graph in fig. 3-11a-c. The total change is also plotted
for each case accounting for all of the effects which fit very well the observed
change in index.
A number of conclusions can be made from these plots. First of all, the
dominant effect is clearly the bandfilling effect or in this case bandemptyingdue to the n-doped waveguide. The plasma, linear and quadratic effects all
have fairly similar contributions given the doping profile that was used. The rf
change in index is the total change minus the heating portion as under RF
modulation, the device will not heat up much. This RF line appears to line up
well with the RF Vpi data observed in the next chapter in this case ~ 4V.
From the change in phase due to a change in index, one can determine the
modulator arm length required to achieve a pi phase shift.
n L D
=D
l p
f 2 [3-33]
Modulator Length to achieve pi shift.
||2 n L
D=
l p
[3-34]
98
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
115/237
For a 300 mm modulator, the index change to achieve a pi shift for 1550 nm is
approximately is 0.26%.
As can be seen from the previous plots, the index and absorption are strongly
dependent on the optical power at DC as the modulator is heated and
experiences bandgap shrinkage. Under RF modulation, this efficiency is not
very power dependent. As the heating due to the photocurrent absorption
changes the refractive in the same direction as the other effects, at DC this
gives the appearance that the efficiency is better than it is at RF. Obviously, DC
extinction is not a very good indicator of RF performance.
3.8 HIGH SPEED DESIGN
Capacitance and carrier lifetime govern the maximum bandwidth possible for a
modulator. For a lumped modulator with an open termination port, the small-
signal modulation response is given by:
2
21 12
jwRC S
+= [3.35]
assuming that the microwave attenuation is low[5]. Typically, there are three
approaches to achieving high speed operation: low impedance matching 14,
reducing the capacitance and distributing the modulation region 15. The
14 See Chapter 4 Termination Section
15 with T sections as shown in Chapter 4
99
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
116/237
capacitance can be decreased by either increasing the intrinsic region in the
waveguide16, lowering the pad capacitance with low k dielectrics, or decreasing
the waveguide area[314,320]17
. An accurate account of the capacitance in thestructure needs to take into account the junction capacitance [C j], parallel plate
capacitance [C pp] of the interconnect region and the fringing capacitance[C f ] for
the geometry as shown in the side-view of the modulator ridge in Fig 3-12.
Fig 3-12 Modulator end-view with different contributions of capacitance
16 Reducing the modulator efficiency and reducing the optical loss
17 Potentially increasing optical loss and or drive voltage
100
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
117/237
Next we will look at the minimization of these capacitances separately. In
both lumped and traveling wave devices, one would like to reduce the
capacitance per unit length.
3.5 JUNCTION CAPACITANCE MINIMIZATION
The PN junction capacitance is minimized by using a short device with a
narrow ridge. As shown in Fig. 3-13, the junction capacitance improves for
wider intrinsic region widths and lower doping levels. The material exhibits less
free carrier absorption with low doping particularly Zn. Structures with large
intrinsic regions do not provide high electric fields so
Fig 3-13 Capacitance per unit length [pF/m] for various doping structures - 2 mm ridge
101
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
118/237
clearly there is a tradeoff between capacitance as improved with a PIN
structure and efficiency with a PN junction. Since the devices here use a low-
doped PN junction18
, the bandwidth varies considerably with bias as seen inthe variance in fig 3-13 of the capacitance with bias. As an illustration of this,
the small-signal modulation response is shown for a 200 m long lumped MZ at
various biases in fig. 3-14.
Fig. 3-14 Small-Signal normalized modulation response at 1555nm for a 200um long electrode
device.
18 3e17 Si as in Fig 3-9b
102
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
119/237
The waveguide is depleted out as the bias induced electric field increases in
the waveguide changing the capacitance and bandwidth as shown in fig 3-
14.
In this work, the ridges were tapered down to 2.5 m (effectively 2.2 m) in the
modulator regions. This did not seem to adversely affect the insertion loss of
the modulators much as was shown in Chap. 1. Below 2m wide, one would
expect propagation losses to increase markedly due to light scattering.
3.6 PARASITIC CAPACITANCE MINIMIZATION
There are a number of different innovative materials that can be used for
providing a low-dielectric constant dielectric layer in the modulator section as
shown in table 3-1.
103
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
120/237
Table 3-1 Dielectric MaterialsMaterial Dielectric ConstantNanoporous silica
1.3 2.8Fluorinated organic polymers 1.8 3.0Fluorinated amorphous carbon 2.1 2.3Non-fluorinated organic polymers 2.5 3.5Cyclotene Benzocyclobutene (BCB) 2.65SILK (Dow) 2.65Non-fluorinated polymers 2.7 3.5Inorganic polymers 2.7 3.5Phase separated hybrids 2.8 3.0
Poly-imides 3.2 3.4Fluorinated HDPCVD SiO2
Fluorinated PECVD SiO2 3.5
Thermal SiO2 3.9Plasma deposited SiO 2 4.2Thermal silicon nitride Si3N4 7.9Plasma silicon nitride Si-N-H 7.0 9.0
Application techniques, vary from LPCVD, PECVD, sputtering, to deposition of
low-K liquids by simple spin coating and multiple baking techniques, similar to
photoresist processing. These materials are helpful for a number of reasons.
First of all, the parasitic capacitance in the modulator is reduced due to the low
dielectric constant which is important for high speed. Also, the dielectrics are
useful for planarization over rough topographies on InP wafers particularly
with n-topside contacts.
104
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
121/237
Although there are a number of low-k electronic material candidates for
electronic device designs such as oxide-based materials that can handle
temperatures as high as 600C, Cyclotene BCB was chosen for fabrication asthe dielectric material has not only a low dielectric constant (2.65) but is
easily cleaved and easily applied.
Fig 3-15a PhotoBCB planarized ridges Fig. 3-15b Dry-etchable BCB
Although dry-etchable BCB tends to have superior planarity over
photodefinable varieties (see fig 3-15ab) the latter choice avoids excessive
overetches of the BCB that are necessary in order to remove BCB residuals
fully from the surface as shown in Fig. 3-16. The shelf life of Photo-BCB is not
very long however at room temperature 19, so freezing it is a necessity.
19 approximately 1 week
105
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
122/237
BCB scum
voids
Fig 3-16. BCB residuals after etch
The reactive ion etcher (RIE) tends to leave a BCB residue scum on the
surface with the etch conditions that were used consisting of 20% CF 4/ 80% O2
with either 250V (W) or 350V (W) conditions as recommended by Dow.
Going to a lower CF4 percentage gives better selectivity between the BCB and
Silicon oxy-nitride layers however is more susceptible to oxide scum and the
etch rate decreases dramatically.
BCB
Fig 3-17 Cyclotene 4024 PhotoBCB defined in only the modulator regions.
106
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
123/237
Due to adhesion problems and device heat dissipation issues BCB was
defined to be only under the modulator section pads. This was defined using a
photolithographic stepper tool and the rest developed off using a puddleemersion developer DS-2100 avoiding a 5 m BCB etch. It was found that
adhesion of the pads during wirebonding was not acceptable on the first device
run due to the BCB being etched under the pads which had excessive
roughness and resulted in delamination during wedgebonding. Using a
different approach only etching a via to the ridge and leaving the area under
the pad unetched with a sandwiching layer of SiN yOx on top of the BCB proved
superior not only as a thicker dielectric leaving lower parasitic capacitance
but very good adhesion for wirebonding. See process Appendix C. Photo-BCB
does not have very good definition resolution as can be seen in fig. 17-a with
very sloped sidewalls, however it is sufficient for this application.
3.7 FRINGING CAPACITANCE
Using the basic geometry given in Fig. 3-12, one can calculate the parallel-
plate capacitance C pp of the interconnect segment. However, in interconnect
lines where the wire thickness (t) is comparable in magnitude to the ground-
plane distance (h), fringing electric fields significantly increase the total parasitic
capacitance (fig. 3-1). It has been shown [315] that the influence of fringing
fields increases with the decreasing (w/h) ratio, and that the fringing-field
107
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
124/237
capacitance can be as much as 10-20 times larger than the parallel-plate
capacitance. It was mentioned earlier that the sub-micron fabrication
technologies allow the width of the metal lines to be decreased somewhat, yetthe thickness of the line must be preserved in order to ensure structural
integrity. This situation, which involves narrow metal lines with a considerable
vertical thickness, is especially vulnerable to fringing field effects.
A set of simple formulas [315] can be used to estimate the capacitance of the
interconnect structures in which fringing fields complicate the parasitic
capacitance calculation. The following two cases are considered for two
different ranges of line width (w).
+++
+
-
=
2222
1ln
22
t h
t h
t hh
t w
C p
e for 2t
w [3.36]
+
+++
-+= 47.1
2222
1ln
20543.0
1(
t h
t h
t h
ht
hw
C p
e for 2t
w < [3.37]
108
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
125/237
where t, h and w are the dimensions as shown in Fig 3-12. These formulas
permit the accurate approximation of the parasitic capacitance values to within
10% error, even for very small values of (t/h).
The other contribution of capacitance is attributed to the parasitic capacitance
of the contact pad. This contribution was measured in Fig 4-3b to be
approximately 0.2pF. Figure 3-18 shows the parasitic capacitance as a
function of dielectric thickness for different dielectrics and modulator lengths.
2BCB 100um deviceBCB 200um deviceBCB 300um deviceSiNx 100um deviceSiNx 200um deviceSiNx 300um device
P ar a
s i t i c P
a d C a p a c i t an c e ( pF
)
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
01 2 3 40.5 1.5 2.5 3.5
Dielectric Thickness (m)
Fig. 3-18. Pad Capacitance for different dielectrics and pad sizes w/fringing fields
3.8 MULTI-MODE INTERFERENCE DESIGN
Another very important element to the Mach-Zehnder design is that of the
MMI splitters and combiners[326-331]. General MMI theory states that the
109
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
126/237
shortest 1x2 splitter requires a length of 3/8L pi where the beat length of the two
lowest order modes is given by[328]:
o
eff eff wn Ll
p
34 2
= [3-38]
where neff is the effective index of the mode, l is the wavelength, and w eff is the equivalent widthof the MMI
Fig. 3-19a Electric Field profile for the optimized MMI design showing imaging into the two MZbranches (Waveguide 1.4Q @ 1550nm)Fig. 3-19b MMI with curved waveguides (Height = 9um Length = 85um, taper = 20um)
Using Beamprop, an MMI design was optimized with a center wavelength of
1550nm as shown in fig 3-19ab. MMIs have broad optical bandwidth20[328]
much wider than the tuning range of the SGDBRs here (38nm). The length of
the MMI becomes very long for wide widths due to the quadratic dependence
so it is imperative to minimize the width as much as possible. A 9 m wide
MMI was chosen to that the gap between the waveguides could be resolved
with the stepper as shown in Fig. 3-20. Note also the high angle sidewall in
110
20 close to 100nm for 1dB bandwidth
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
127/237
this gap due to the crystal orientation during the ridge wet etch. This sidewall is
not likely to adversely affect reflections in the device in fact it gives a more
gradual index discontinuity.
Fig 3-20 Gap between waveguides approximately 1m
Curved waveguides were used to extend the separation distance to 16m asshown in Fig 3-21 to minimize the propagation distance. The ridge was defined
using a dry etch/wet etch process where approximately 1m of material is RIE
etched with Methane/Hydrogen/Oxygen with a subsequent 3:1 H 3PO4:HCl wet-
etch to remove the rest of the InP on top of the waveguide. As the radius of
curvature is low, the sidewall roughness appears to be low as shown in fig. 3-
16.
111
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
128/237
Fig. 3-21 Sidewall roughness on curved waveguides and MMI taper
3.9 PHASE SHIFTER
A phase shifter electrode was integrated in one branch of the MZ in order to
facilitate changing the phase for different wavelengths. It is best to design the
waveguide structure to achieve a pi-phase shift without bias. Pi-shifted
modulators have been fabricated with one length a multiple of 0.241m 21
longer than the other. The devices in this dissertation utilize a pi-shiftedconfiguration however this is accomplished using one ridge slightly wider
(0.2 m) in the curved waveguide regions than the other to achieve the pi
shift22[300]. Unlike the RF sections, the phase section can be forward biased,
which gives close to 5x the index shift as reverse bias as illustrated in fig. 3-
22.
112
21 for 1550nm
22 This is easier due to fabrication tolerances
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
129/237
Fig. 3-22 Fiber-coupled power for device #1 as a function of bias on phase section in bothforward and reverse bias
As this device needs to operate over the full C-Band in which the pi-shift will
change with wavelength, designs allowed for the use of a forward biased
electrode to achieve the pi-phase shift. This requires fairly good control over
waveguide widths/thicknesses/compositions in order to achieve from run-to-
run. By biasing this electrode however, it induces a significant amount of loss
in that waveguide as shown in fig. 3-17. Ideally the device is forward biased
slightly as very little current is required ~2mA to achieve the desired phase.
113
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
130/237
Fig. 3-23 Normalized Optical Loss vs. wavelength and bias for 100 m long phase electrode
The loss was measured with Device #1 23 where the laser sections are forward
biased, and the SOA is reverse biased to measure the optical power that
makes it through the phase section as a function of bias on the phase
electrode.
3.10 1ST GENERATION DESIGN
The initial design involved the integration of a SGDBR with a passive Mach-
Zehnder modulator as demonstrated in fig 3-24.
23 see Generation 2 designs 3.10
114
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
131/237
Fig 3-24 Integrated SGDBR- Mach Zehnder modulator
One branch of the MZ modulator was meant for DC biasing to change the
phase for each wavelength, and the second for RF modulation (Pad #2).
Devices were fabricated with parameters as shown in Table 3-2. These
modulators uses two identical 3dB MMI splitters/combiners that are 98m long
as described in section 3.8.
Table 3-2 1st Generation DevicesMach Zehnder Lengths 550,750,950Waveguide offset 40umWidth1 2um
Width2 2.1 to 2.2 to achieve pi shiftCurve length 185Curve width 20umTrench 15umMMI length 98umMMI width 9um
115
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
132/237
Although these devices were fairly long and suffered from high capacitance
due to the problem outlined in fig. 2-7b, the DC extinction and chirp24
characteristics looked promising as shown in fig. 3-25.
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0
+0.8Vbias+0.6V+0.3V0V Bias-1V Bias-2V Bias-3V
O u t p u
t P o w e r
( d B m
)
Arm #1 DC Bias Voltage
Fig 3-25 550m long electrode at = 1535nm
3.10 2 ND GENERATION DESIGNS
A number of different improvements were made to the 2 nd generation devices
to improve performance. First, SOAs were integrated before the MZ and inside
the MZ modulator to mitigate the 4-5dB insertion losses. Additionally, the gap
between the two waveguides was reduced from 37um to 16um which allowed
for shorter curved waveguide sections. A 2x2 MMI was placed at the output to
24 As will be shown in Chap 5
116
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
133/237
guide away off-state light in a controllable way as shown in fig. 3-20. The
output was curved and flared as well as a front passive detector electrode
placed on the output waveguide to reduce reflections. Also, two RF electrodeswere placed on each device so that push-pull modulation could be possible. In
addition, considerably shorter electrodes were employed to improve the high
speed performance.
Output
Laser Input
1x2 splitter 2x2 combiner
Fig. 3-26 Ridge waveguide structure illustrating the 1x2 and 2x2 MMIs with curved waveguidesand output flares
The first three devices have Dual SOAs as mentioned in Chapter 1. Device 7
and 8 have electrodes at the rear of the modulator for rear resistive termination
as will be elaborated in chapter 4 and 5.
117
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
134/237
The first 8 designs use lumped electrodes and are shown for reference:
Table 3-3 Lumped electrode MZ devicesTotal device length = 3200 m
#SOAConfig MZ Electrode Length SOA Length
1 Dual 300 350
2 Dual 250 350
3 Dual 200 350
4 Single 300 400
5 Single 250 400
6 Single 200 400
7 Single 300 400
8 Single 200 400
118
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
135/237
REFERENCES
[300] Yu J, Rolland C, Yevick D, Somani A, Bradshaw S. Phase-engineeredIII-V MQW Mach-Zehnder modulators. IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters, vol.8, no.8, Aug. 1996, pp.1018-20.
[301] Lawetz C, Cartledge JC, Rolland C, Yu J. Modulation characteristics of semiconductor Mach-Zehnder optical modulators. Journal of LightwaveTechnology, vol.15, no.4, April 1997, pp.697-703.
[302] Bardyszewski W, Yevick D, Yong Liu, Rolland C, Bradshaw S.
Theoretical and experimental analysis of Mach-Zehnder quantum-wellmodulators. Journal of Applied Physics, vol.80, no.2, 15 July 1996,pp.1136-41.
[303] Fetterman M, Chao C-P, Forrest SR. Fabrication and analysis of high-contrast InGaAsP-InP Mach-Zehnder modulators for use at 1.55- mu mwavelength. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol.8, no.1, Jan. 1996,pp.69-71.
[304] Cites JS, Ashley PR. High-performance Mach-Zehnder modulators inmultiple quantum well GaAs/AlGaAs. Journal of Lightwave Technology,
vol.12, no.7, July 1994, pp.1167-73.[305] T. Hausken, High Performance Double Heterostructure and Quantum
Well Waveguide Phase Modulators in GaAs/AlGaAs, P.h.D Dissertation1990.
[306] Xun Li, Huang W-P, Adams DM, Rolland C, Makino T. Modeling anddesign of a DFB laser integrated with a Mach-Zehnder modulator.[Journal Paper] IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol.34, no.10, Oct.1998, pp.1807-15.
[307] Adams DM, Rolland C, Puetz N, Moore RS, Shepherd FR, Kim HB,Bradshaw S. Mach-Zehnder modulator integrated with a gain-coupledDFB laser for 10 Gbit/s, 100 km NDSF transmission at 1.55 um.Electronics Letters, vol.32, no.5, 29 Feb. 1996, pp.485-6.
[308] Adams DM, Rolland C, Fekecs A, McGhan D, Somani A, Bradshaw S,Poirier M, Dupont E, Cremer E, Anderson K. 1.55 um transmission at 2.5
119
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
136/237
Gbit/s over 1102 km of NDSF using discrete and monolithically integratedInGaAsP-InP Mach-Zehnder modulator and DFB laser. ElectronicsLetters, vol.34, no.8, 16 April 1998, pp.771-3.
[309] Barton JS, Skogen EJ, Masanovic ML, DenBaars SP, Coldren LA.,Tailorable chirp using integrated Mach-Zehnder modulators with tunablesampled grating distributed Bragg reflector lasers. 2002 IEEE 18thInternational Semiconductor Laser Conference. Conference Digest (Cat.No.02CH37390). IEEE. 2002, pp.49-50.
[310] Chin MK. Optical confinement factor in waveguide electroabsorptionmodulators: design and measurement. IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters, vol.6, no.8, Aug. 1994, pp.945-8.
[311] Chin MK. Effect of electroabsorption on electrorefractive intensity
modulators. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol.4, no.6, June1992, pp.583-5.
[312] J. D. Dow and D. Redfield, Towards a unified theory of Urbachs rule andexponential absorption edge, Phys. Rev. B 5, 594-610 (1972)
[313] Mason B, Fish GA, DenBaars SP, Coldren LA. Widely tunable sampledgrating DBR laser with integrated electroabsorption modulator. IEEEPhotonics Technology Letters, vol.11, no.6, June 1999, pp.638-40.
[314] Satzke K, Baums D, Cebulla U, Haisch H, Kaiser D, Lach E, Kuhn E,
Weber J, Weinmann R, Wiedemann P, Zielinski E. Ultrahigh-bandwidth(42 GHz) polarisation-independent ridge waveguide electroabsorptionmodulator based on tensile strained InGaAsP MQW. Electronics Letters,vol.31, no.23, 9 Nov. 1995, pp.2030-2..
[315] Yuan CP, Trick TN. A simple formula for the estimation of thecapacitance of two-dimensional interconnects in VLSI circuits. IEEEElectron Device Letters, vol.EDL-3, no.12, Dec. 1982, pp.391-3.
[316] V. Swaminathan, A. T. Macrander, Materials Aspects of GaAs and InPBased Structures Prentice Hall Advanced Reference Series, 1991. pg
355.[317] Penninckx D, Delansay Ph. Comparison of the propagation performance
over standard dispersive fiber between InP-based pi -phase-shifted andsymmetrical Mach-Zehnder modulators. IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters, vol.9, no.9, Sept. 1997, pp.1250-2.
120
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
137/237
[318] Hishimura Nishimura S, Inoue H, Sano H, Ishida K. Electrooptic effectsin an InGaAs/InAlAs multiquantum well structure. IEEE PhotonicsTechnology Letters, vol.4, no.10, Oct. 1992, pp.1123-6.
[319] Mak G, Rolland C, Fox KE, Blaauw C. High-speed bulk InGaAsP-InPelectroabsorption modulators with bandwidth in excess of 20 GHz. IEEEPhotonics Technology Letters, vol.2, no.10, Oct. 1990, pp.730-3.
[320] Ido T, Tanaka S, Suzuki M, Koizumi M, Sano H, Inoue H. Ultra-high-speed multiple-quantum-well electro-absorption optical modulators withintegrated waveguides. Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol.14, no.9,Sept. 1996, pp.2026-34.
[321] Delansay P, Penninckx D, Boucherez E, Fortin C, Le Gouezigou O.InP/GaInAsP phase-shifted Mach-Zehnder modulator for wavelength-
independent (1530-1560 nm) performance in 10 Gbit/s transmission over dispersive fiber.Conference on Optical Fiber Communications. TechnicalDigest. Postconference Edition. 1997 OSA Technical Digest Series. Vol.6(IEEE Cat. No.97CH36049). Opt. Soc. America. 1997, pp.11-12.
[322] Rolland C. InGaAsP-based Mach-Zehnder modulators for high-speedtransmission systems. OFC '98. Optical Fiber CommunicationConference and Exhibit. Technical Digest. Conference Edition. 1998 OSATechnical Digest Series Vol.2 (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36177). Opt. Soc.
America. 1998, pp.283-4.
[323] Soda H, Furutsu M, Sato K, Okazaki N, Yamazaki S, Nishimoto H,Ishikawa H. High-power and high-speed semi-insulating BH structuremonolithic electroabsorption modulator/DFB laser light source.Electronics Letters, vol.26, no.1, 4 Jan. 1990, pp.9-10.
[324] Jackel JL, Perlmutter P, Johnson J. High-speed low-voltage modulationwith a nonsymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Journal of LightwaveTechnology, vol.7, no.6, June 1989, pp.937-40.
[325] Rolland C, Mak G, Prosyk KL, Maritan CM, Puetz N. High speed and lowloss, bulk electroabsorption waveguide modulators at 1.3 mu m. IEEE
Photonics Technology Letters, vol.3, no.10, Oct. 1991, pp.894-6.[326] Pennings ECM, van Roijen R, van Stralen MJN, de Waard PJ, Koumans
RGMP, Verbeck BH. Reflection properties of multimode interferencedevices. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol.6, no.6, June 1994,pp.715-18.
121
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
138/237
[327] Soldano LB, Pennings ECM. Optical multi-mode interference devicesbased on self-imaging: principles and applications. Journal of LightwaveTechnology, vol.13, no.4, April 1995, pp.615-27.
[328] Besse PA, Bachmann M, Melchior H, Soldano LB, Smit MK. Opticalbandwidth and fabrication tolerances of multimode interference couplers.Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol.12, no.6, June 1994, pp.1004-9.
[329] Erasme D, Spiekman LH, Herben CGP, Smit MK, Groen FH.Experimental assessment of the reflection of passive multimodeinterference couplers. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol.9, no.12,Dec. 1997, pp.1604-6.
[330] Leuthold J, Joyner CW. Multimode interference couplers with tunablepower splitting ratios. Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol.19, no.5,
May 2001, pp.700-7.[331] Rolland C, Adams DM, Yevick D, Hermansson B. Optimization of
strongly guiding semiconductor rib waveguide Y-junctions. IEEEPhotonics Technology Letters, vol.2, no.6, June 1990, pp.404-6.
[332] Cartledge JC, Rolland C, Lemerle S, Solheim A. Theoreticalperformance of 10 Gb/s lightwave systems using a III-V semiconductor Mach-Zehnder modulator. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol.6,no.2, Feb. 1994, pp.282-4.
[333] Janz CF, Keyworth BP, Allegretto W, Macdonald RI, Fallahi M, Hillier G,Rolland C. Mach-Zehnder switch using an ultra-compact directionalcoupler in a strongly-confining rib structure. IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters, vol.6, no.8, Aug. 1994, pp.981-3.
[334] Rolland C, Moore RS, Shepherd F, Hillier G. 10 Gbit/s, 1.56 mu mmultiquantum well InP/InGaAsP Mach-Zehnder optical modulator.Electronics Letters, vol.29, no.5, 4 March 1993, pp.471-2.
[335] Rolland C, Adams DM, Yevick D, Hermansson B. Optimization of strongly guiding semiconductor rib waveguide Y-junctions. IEEE
Photonics Technology Letters, vol.2, no.6, June 1990, pp.404-6..[336] Rolland C, Mak G, Fox KE, Adams DM, Springthorpe AJ, Yevick D,
Hermansson B. Analysis of strongly guiding rib waveguide S-bends:theory and experiment. Electronics Letters, vol.25, no.18, 31 Aug. 1989,pp.1256-7.
122
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
139/237
[337] Bennett BR, Soref RA, Del Alamo JA. Carrier-induced change inrefractive index of InP, GaAs and InGaAsP. IEEE Journal of QuantumElectronics, vol.26, no.1, Jan. 1990, pp.113-22.
[338] Zucker JE, Jones KL, Newkirk MA, Gnall RP, Miller BI, Young MG, KorenU, Burrus CA, Tell B. Quantum well interferometric modulator monolithically integrated with 1.55 um tunable distributed Bragg reflector laser. Electronics Letters, vol.28, no.20, 24 Sept. 1992, pp.1888-9.
[339] ] Djurisic AB, Rakic AD, Kwok PCK, Li EH, Majewski ML. Modeling theoptical constants of GaP, InP, and InAs. Journal of Applied Physics,vol.85, no.7, 1 April 1999, pp.3638-42.
[340] Cahill LW, Payne FP. Optical switches based on the generalized Mach-Zehnder interferometer. 2000 Digest of the LEOS Summer Topical
Meetings. Electronic-Enhanced Optics. Optical Sensing in Semiconductor Manufacturing. Electro-Optics in Space. Broadband Optical Networks(Cat. No.00TH8497). IEEE. 2000, pp.IV57-8. .
[341] Brindel P, Leclerc O, Duchet C, Goix M, Grard E, Maunand E, DesurvireE. 20 Gbit/s optically regenerated transmission over 40 mm based onpolarisation-independent, push-pull InP Mach-Zehnder modulator.[Conference Paper] 24th European Conference on OpticalCommunication. ECOC '98 (IEEE Cat. No.98TH8398). Telefonica. Partvol.1, 1998, pp.685-6 vol.1.
[342] O. Leclerc, P. Brindel, D. Rouvillain, E. Pincermin, B. Dany, E. Desurvire,C. Duchet, E. Boucheriz, S. Bourchoule, 40Gbit/s polarization-independent, push-pull InP Mach-Zehnder modulator for all-opticalregeneration PD35-1
[343] O. Leclerc, C. Duchet, P. Brindel, M. Goix, E. Grard, E. Maunand, E.Desurvire, Polarization-independent InP push-pull Mach-Zehnder modulator for 20Gbit/s soliton regeneration, Electronic Lett. Vol. 34, No.10, May 14, 1998.
[344] Bach HG, Krauser J, Nolting HP, Logan RA, Reinhart FK. Electro-optical
light modulation in InGaAsP/InP double heterostructure diodes. AppliedPhysics Letters, vol.42, no.8, 15 April 1983, pp.692-4. USA.
[345] Adachi S, Oe K. Linear electro-optic effects in zincblende-typesemiconductors: key properties of InGaAsP relevant to device design.Journal of Applied Physics, vol.56, no.1, 1 July 1984, pp.74-80.
123
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
140/237
[346] Alping A, Coldren LA. Electrorefraction in GaAs and InGaAsP and itsapplication to phase modulators. Journal of Applied Physics, vol.61,no.7, 1 April 1987, pp.2430-3..
[347] Vinchant J-F, Cavailles JA, Erman M, Jarry P, Renaud M. InP/GaInAsPguided-wave phase modulators based on carrier-induced effects: theoryand experiment. Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol.10, no.1, Jan.1992, pp.63-70.
[348] Fiedler F, Schlachetzki A. Optical parameters of InP-based waveguides.Solid-State Electronics, vol.30, no.1, Jan. 1987, pp.73-83.
[349] Botteldooren D, Baets R. Influence of band-gap shrinkage on the carrier-induced refractive index change in InGaAsP. Applied Physics Letters,vol.54, no.20, 15 May 1989, pp.1989-91.
[350] Van Eck TE, Walpita LM, Chang WSC, Wieder HH. Franz-Keldyshelectrorefraction and electroabsorption in bulk InP and GaAs. AppliedPhysics Letters, vol.48, no.7, 17 Feb. 1986, pp.451-3. USA.
[351] Temkin H, Keramidas VG, Pollack MA, Wagner WR. Temperaturedependence of photoluminescence of n-InGaAsP. Journal of AppliedPhysics, vol.52, no.3, pt.1, March 1981, pp.1574-8.
[352] Adachi S. Refractive indices of III-V compounds: key properties of InGaAsP relevant to device design. Journal of Applied Physics, vol.53,
no.8, Aug. 1982, pp.5863-9.[353] Kingston R.H., Electroabsorption in GaInAsP, Appl. Phys. Lett. 34(11), 1
June 1979.
[354] Dutta NK, Olsson NA. Electroabsorption in InGaAsP-InP doubleheterostructures. Electronics Letters, vol.20, no.15, 19 July 1984, pp.634-5. UK.
124
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
141/237
C h a p t e r 4
Series Push-Pull Modulator Designs As first demonstrated by Walker[7,455] and later Spickermann[456] in the
GaAs/AlGaAs material system, if a RF signal is applied across the two MZ
electrodes thereby connecting the diodes in series one achieves superior
performance in terms of optical bandwidth and zero-chirp performance with a
single RF input. This chapter will first look at the design concept and resultsfrom lumped device designs with input side termination. Next, end-terminated
CPS transmission line electrode designs that aim to match the characteristic
impedance are explored with respect to transmission line design and device
characteristics.
MZ#1 p-contact MZ#2 p-contactSiNxOy
BCBn-contact
Vdc2 RVdc1 MZ #1
InGaAs contact layer RF SIGNALMZ #2
SI InP substrate
Figure 4-1 Series push-pull bias configuration
125
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
142/237
4.1 LUMPED SERIES PUSH-PULL BANDWIDTH
The series push-pull biasing scheme and cross-section of the modulator are
shown in fig. 4-1. The use of a SI substrate lowers the parasitic capacitance
under the electrode pads and enables series push-pull (SPP) operation.
Ideally, there would be full isolation between the n-contact region in the
modulator and that of the rest of the chip. In the devices presented here, the n-
InP region was etched down to the SI-substrate close to the ridge and the p-
InP region was proton implanted. This leaves a narrow region below theshallow ridge that is not effectively isolated. The resistance between the n-
contact to the modulator and that of the rest of the transmitter typically
measured approximately 150 ohms.
Lumped series push-pull devices were fabricated and tested using special
75mm pitch CPS picoprobes with integrated 50 ohm parallel resistors. In this
case, the 50 ohm termination is on the front end of the device. Later
transmission line based devices use a rear termination. The 3dB optical
bandwidth of three different devices with 200mm, 250mm and 300 mm electrode
lengths are shown in fig. 4-2 and compared to the one-sided modulation. The
probe configuration is shown in fig. 4-3 for the single side and SPPconfigurations.
126
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
143/237
GND
GND
SIGNAL
SIGNAL
Fig. 4-2 Biasing for single side and series push pull
Note that using the series push-pull electrode structure almost doubles the
optical bandwidth the loss due to parasitics to ground on one branch of the
MZ which equates to approximately the capacitance from the n-contact to the
backside of the substrate (100 mm thick). The substrate is metalized on the
backside to facilitate soldering to a carrier for good heat conduction.
Alternatively the device could be either flip-chipped without backside
metalization or epoxied to the carrier thereby removing the metallization and
reducing the parasitic capacitance at the expense of reduced thermal
conductivity. Clearly a smaller n-contact region would be beneficial.
One can see in fig 4-3b the capacitance per unit length (1225pF/m and
690pF/m for single side and SPP respectively) as the slope and pad
capacitance as the y-intercept for both single side and SPP modulation.
127
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
144/237
RC f dB
p
13
=
Fig. 4-3a Comparison of single side and series push-pull 3dB optical small signal bandwidthFig 4-3b Capacitance vs electrode length for single side and SPP configuration DC -3V Bias
Due to the photocurrent generated in the devices the impedance is reduced
considerably. This means that with a 50ohm parallel resistor, the single side
configuration has approximately 45.5 ohms and the SPP configuration yields
47.6 ohms. The effect of added bandwidth is also evident in the back-to-back
eye diagrams for the comparison of single side to SPP modulation as shown
for a 250mm long electrode device at 10 Gbit/s with a 2 7-1 PRBS in fig. 4-4.
250mm single side lumped 250 mm SPP
Fig. 4-4 Back to back Eyes comparing single side and series push-pull operation with 10dBextinction. Both at using -2V DC bias with 1.5V Vpp. OC-192 with 27-1 PRBS
128
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
145/237
4.2 DUAL RF SERIES PUSH-PULL DEVICES
As mentioned before, the Dual RF series push-pull devices take advantage of
the improved bandwidth of the SPP electrode structure and reduced voltage by
having two of them. Figure 4-5 shows the device layout and the parasitic
conduction path between the two n-contact regions. Ideally this path would be
cut or reduced by He implanting in between the sets of electrodes. In the
current layer structure this would be difficult as the n-InP and n-InGaAs layers
are approximately 2.3 m thick as well as the ridge on top (2 m) which isdifficult to achieve without very high implant energies. To do this a quaternary
contact would need to be placed much closer to the waveguide ~ 0.5 m.
GND DATA
GND
N-contact DATAN-contact
Fig 4-5 Dual RF Series push-pull 4 electrode structure
Due to the finite conductivity of the n-layer, the conduction path prefers the
closest GND and even without He implantation, the device operates well at
10Gbit/s.
129
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
146/237
Fig 4-6 device layout for Dual RF SPP electrode devices
As can be seen in fig. 4-7, the swing improves considerably with Dual RF
sources. The bandwidth is compromised a bit due to the lack of isolation
between the two n-contacts however not excessively as illustrated in the
back-to-back eyes for single SPP and Dual SPP as shown in fig. 4-7.
Both SPPRisetime:72psFalltime:56ps
One SPPRisetime:65psFalltime:52ps
Fig. 4-7 Optical signal levels for single and dual SPP operation and back-to-back eyediagrams for each with Vpp = 2V with 10Gbit/s PRBS 27-1 signal
130
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
147/237
4.3 TRAVELING WAVE MODULATORS
Numerous groups have demonstrated discrete high-speed modulators and
DFB integrated devices utilizing traveling-wave electrode structures [4,7].
Although lumped electrodes can provide fairly good performance with respect
to bandwidth, careful design of the transmission line will provide superior return
loss (S 11) if the loaded transmission line is designed to match the driver [25 or
50 ohms] and/or superior bandwidth if the microwave index is matched. An
assortment of different transmission line structures have been pursued for traveling wave electrodes. Microstrip, Coplanar waveguide (CPW), and
Coplanar strip (CPS) transmission lines are most often employed. Microstrip,
although simple is sometimes regarded as disadvantageous due to
inaccessible ground planes, difficulties in shunt connections between the strip
and ground, limitations on the substrate thickness and exhibit more radiation
with thick substrates. In the case of CPW lines the impedance is mostly
defined by the lateral dimensions and the substrate thickness is not as
important. CPW localizes the electric field reducing spurious coupling,
radiation and dispersion[402].
Unfortunately, both the even and odd modes can exist in CPW which this odd
mode can be suppressed with air bridges.[408] Additionally, parallel plate
modes are supported (microstrip modes) between the CPW and the ground
plane on the bottom which is a cause of energy leakage from the CPW
131
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
148/237
[408]. As a general rule the thickness of the substrate must be > 2(2G + W) in
order to suppress the microstrip modes. In order to match the characteristic
impedance of the source, the on-chip loaded transmission lines require fairlylarge unloaded characteristic impedances. Although CPW can easily be made
to match 50ohms, capacitively loaded lines require much larger unloaded
characteristic impedances to yield 50 ohms loaded and these high values
cannot be realized in CPW easily with the current doping restraints of the
integration platform. CPW designed for index matching yields poor
characteristic impedance matching. However, Coplanar Stripline (CPS)
which has a range of possible Z o values twice that of CPW works well for the
matching region. CPS was chosen for this reason, and the compactness of the
transmission lines suitable for further integration such as in a photocurrent-
driven wavelength converter.
However, it is more difficult to make a 50 ohm unloaded section (for the
feedthroughs) without very narrow gaps and wide pads leading to higher
microwave attenuation. The feedthroughs were designed at a linear taper as
this was found to be the best approach in [462]. Also, the phase difference
between the two lines will affect the matching ability at higher frequencies.
Ideally the lines should be excited with equal length feedthrough lines. The
design was chosen to have an input line at 30 degrees to allow probing away
132
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
149/237
from the optical waveguide but minimize the phase difference between the
two electrodes.
4.4 TRAVELING WAVE MATCHING
The design of Traveling-Wave (TW) modulators is based on the matching of
the optical and electrical wave velocities. As has been pointed out[454], it is
the group index that should be matched not the phase velocity. In the case
of LiNbO3 modulators, the electrical wave (n eff
4.225) propagates slower thanthe optical wave(neff 2.138)[303,421,424]. To perform matching, one can use
a buffer layer, phase reversal, or a shielding plane to decrease the microwave
effective index of the line[422,423]. Alternatively, one can increase the
electrode thickness, decreasing the effective index further [421]. GaAs and
InP, modulators can have electrical waves that propagate faster than the
optical wave. In order to match the index, often either capacitive coupling or
inductive coupling approaches are employed. According to work done by
Spickermann et al.[461], the inductively coupled slow wave structures have
higher attenuation loss for a given gap width and are harder to model than
capacitively-coupled devices. LiNbO3 devices do not have a PN structure and
do not load the line substantially similarly to devices such as demonstrated by
Spickermann that rely on the electric field between the electrodes to change
the index which usually is far less efficient than the use of a PN structure.
The devices in this dissertation use PN junctions to increase the electric field
133
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
150/237
overlap with the optical mode which leads to a very large capacitance per unit
length resulting in a similar situation as the LiNbO3 where the microwave
index is much higher than the optical index.
For a capacitively loaded transmission line, the optimum loading capacitance is
given by Walker:
optoo
cpwoptoloading ncZ
nnC
22-
=
[4.1]
where c is the speed of light, n opto is the optical group index, n cpw is the electrical index and Z o isthe characteristic impedance
However, in order to fabricate high performance SGDBRs, the doping required
typically results in capacitance per unit lengths in the range of 2000pF/m to
2500pF/m for a 3mm wide ridge. The junction capacitance/length of the device
due to the PN or PIN region is considerably larger (x10) than the
capacitance/length of the coplanar line. The result of this is the line is highly
capacitively coupled which both slows the electrical wave and reduces the
characteristic impedance considerably.
First, the optical group index of the modulator section needs to be assessed.
The effective index and group index are shown in fig. 4.8 for various waveguide
compositions.
134
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
151/237
3.3.
3E f f e
c t i v eI n d ex
.35
325
1.3Q1.35Q1.4Q1.45Q
3.2 1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 1570Wavelength (nm)
1580
3.43.3.44.4. G
r o u pI n
d ex
24
68
1.3Q1.35Q1.4Q1.45Q
1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 1570 1580
Wavelength (nm)
Fig. 4-8 Effective Index and Group index for different waveguide compositions. Assuming astructure where the waveguide has been etched off halfway.
One can see that not only is the group index significantly higher for waveguide
compositions at approx. 1.45 but the dispersion increases as the operating
wavelength approaches that of the band-edge. One will obtain a superior
velocity match at the lower wavelengths and higher waveguide Q as loaded
transmission lines tend to slow the electrical wave excessively. Matching over
a wide wavelength range becomes more difficult as the waveguide composition
Q increases.
135
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
152/237
Next we should consider the group index of the microwave signal. The
electrical signal does not have as much dispersion as the optical signal and is
often approximated as just the phase velocity. The dispersion has been curvefitted from spectral domain data and is given by [415].
)1()()(
1
b
qr qeff eff aF
f f n -+
-
+==
e e
e e
[4.2]
14 11 -=
r
TE h
c f e
[4.3]
where: f = frequency; F = f/f TE
the cutoff frequency for the lowest-order TE mode
)log(
10v
W S
u
a+
= [4.4]
u0.54 0.64q + 0.015q 2 v0.43 0.86q + 0.54q 2 q = log(S/h1)h1 thickness of substrateb = 1.8e q = effective permittivity at the quasi-static limit.
136
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
153/237
4.5 TRANSMISSION LINE MODEL
The CPS transmission line in these series push-pull devices can be modeled
as a distributed circuit model along the device as shown in fig. 4-9. Often, the
characteristic impedance of a transmission line is approximated for low
microwave loss in equation 4.5.
cps
cpslosslesso
C
L
Y
Z Z = [4.5]
cpscpslossless C Lc ZY cn =m [4.6]
However, the devices here experience microwave losses due to a number of
sources as outlined in section 4.7 and the transmission line model fits the data
best if the capacitive and inductive loading are accounted for in the model. The
transmission lines in the device are loaded by the depletion capacitance from
each ridge C PN1 and CPN2 in the ridge as is shown in fig. 4-9 as well as a small
amount of inductance due to the T structures. The capacitance shown in fig. 4-
9 is composed of the PN junction capacitance (significant), the CPS
metallization capacitance and the parasitic capacitance.
137
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
154/237
Ccps
CPN G CPN
Fig. 4-9 Device cross-section equivalent circuit for smooth CPS
This can be expressed as a distributed circuit model as shown in fig. 4-10.
RZLcps LT
CPN GPN
Y Gn CcpsCPara GPN2 CPN2
LT
Transmission line Equivalent circuit for T-electrode CPS line
Fig. 4-10 Transmission line distributed equivalent circuit. Gn is conductance in n-claddingregion, Cpara is parasitic capacitance to ground, L T is the T-inductance, G PN is the conductancedue to the photocurrent in the ridge C pn is the depletion capacitance
138
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
155/237
The equivalent circuit model for the smooth CPS line devices is the same as
given in fig 4-10 except without the inductance contribution of the Ts (LT = 0).
Given the equivalent circuit model in fig. 4-10, the characteristic impedance of the smooth CPS transmission line can be expressed as:
cps L j R Z w += [4.7]
+++
+=
p PN PN
n
ncps smooth
C C C jG
GC jY
21
111 w
w [4.8]
+
+++
+==
p PN PN
n
ncps
cps
smoothosmooth
C C C jG
GC j
L j R
Y Z
Z
21
111
)(
w
w
w
[4.9]
The T structures have some additional inductance as shown in the equivalent
circuit in fig. 4.10
( ) p PN PN PN PN T ncpsT T
C C jGC jG L j
G
C jY
+++
+++
+=
21
112
11
w w w
w [4.10]
( ) p PN PN PN PN T ncpsT
cpsT
T oT
C C jGC jG L j
G
C j
L j R
Y
Z Z
+++
+++
+
+==
21
112
11
)(
w w w
w
w [4.11]
139
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
156/237
4.6 CHARACTERISTIC IMPEDANCE COMPARISON
The CPS lines used in this dissertation were modeled using ADS software. As
the lines are considerably capacitively loaded, this means we need to design a
transmission line that has a much larger impedance unloaded in order to
obtain 50ohms loaded. Figure 4.11 shows the unloaded characteristic
impedance for two CPS structures, one with 50 mm Ts and one with a smooth
CPS line 16mm apart with 8mm wide strips.
4.11 Unloaded Characteristic Impedance for smooth CPS and 50 mm T structures from devicesas shown in table 4.2. 1.5 mm thick Au
As can be seen in fig. 4-12a, narrow lines increase the characteristic
impedance by increasing the inductance at the expense of microwave loss.
140
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
157/237
A much higher characteristic impedance is possible with the Ts as shown in fig
4-12b for a given electrode width. The width of the T electrodes was chosen at
8 m as a compromise with microwave loss shown in fig 4-12b as design G.
25
30
35
40
45
50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
2468101215
C h a r a c t e r
i s t i c I m p e
d a n c e
Frequency (GHz)
16um spacing 1000pF/m loading
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Design G 5umDesignG 8umDesignG 15um
L o a d e d
C h a r a c
t e r i s
t i c I m p e
d a n c e
Frequency (GHz)
Fig 4-12a Characteristic Impedance for different CPS line widths given a 16um spacingFig 4-12b Characteristic impedance for T-section electrodes vs electrode width
From S parameters and the resulting [ABCD] matrix, the characteristic
impedance was extracted for different biases for device #9. After testing the
characteristic impedance of the different devices it was clear that they dont fit
the characteristics shown at low frequencies in fig 4-12b. After analyzing the
expected conductance in the structure, it was obvious that the n-epilayer
conductance for this structure is considerably higher than that of previousstructures done on lower doped or dielectric substrates.
141
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
158/237
Based on Hall measurements:The conductivity of the n-layer between the ridges is given by
nq nn InP m s =)( = (1.6E-19 C)(1800cm2/Vs)(1E18 1/cm3) = 288 S/cm (0.032S/cm
in Spickermann)
where the Conductance is
)(2)( Length Area
nG InP InP s = = 1.469 S (compare with 0.01S in Spickermann)
Where the Length is 16 m; Area = (2.3m*314m) for Device #9
Data was taken comparing the characteristic impedance of T structures,
smooth CPS lines and lumped rear terminated electrode devices. The fit fromthe model shown in equations 4.9 and 4.11 are also shown assuming for the Ts
the capacitance per unit length of the transmission line is C T = 2.737e-11F/m,
Inductance per unit length is LT = 1.736e-6 H/m and for the smooth CPS C s =
4.602e-11F/m and L s = 7.3068e-7H/m with Rpn = 500ohms, R = 0.2 ohms, C pn
= 0.5pF, C para = 0.5pF, LT = 5e-12.
142
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
159/237
Fig 4.13 Lower 4 lines extracted from Device #7 (single side 300mm long electrode)
Middle 4 lines extracted from Device #18 (Smooth CPS 500mm long electrode)Top 4 lines extracted from Device #7 (CPS Ts 250 mm long electrode)
As can be seen in fig 4-13, the characteristic impedance improves for higher
reverse biases on the electrodes where the depletion region is increased and
the capacitance/unit length decreases. Also, clearly one can see a large
benefit of using a T electrode over the smooth CPS lines in terms of better
characteristic impedance matching as it is much closer to 50 ohms.
143
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
160/237
4.7 RF LOSS MECHANISMS
High frequency losses stem from three different mechanisms:
1. Dielectric losses2. Ohmic/conductor losses3. Radiation loss
These losses can be minimized using a number of approaches such as the use
of deep trenches between electrodes or thick dielectric layers below the
electrodes separating them from the substrate. By careful design of the
electrodes, minimization of longitudinal substrate currents may also reduce the
overall microwave attenuation[435]. Most work is done on Semi-insulating InP
and GaAs where the bulk of the electrical attenuation comes from the
conductor and radiation losses at least below 20GHz [450]. However, typical
SGDBR design is performed on n-InP conducting substrates with lossy InGaAs
contact layers. In this case, the dielectric losses are very high and the lines
become highly dispersive. Also, the capacitance between the two lines
increases dramatically - effectively loading the line and dropping the
characteristic impedance significantly. Dielectric loss is given by the following
relationship:
g eff
r D
ql e
d e a tan=
(Np/m) *27.3 for dB/lamda [4.12]
144
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
161/237
For a doped semiconductor the loss tangent can be expressed as[450]:
)(")('2)(')("2
)(tan f f f f f f
f s e p
s e p d
+
+= [4.13]
where e and e are the real and imaginary parts of the complex dielectric
permittivity and s and s are the respective parts of the complex conductivity.
Taking the conductivity from the Drude model, we have s = s s/(1-j2pf t m) where
the conductivity can be extracted from Hall measurements.
The attenuation drops linearly with increasing metal thickness up to the point
where the metal depth is 3x skin depth. As the dimensions of the transmission
line increase, the attenuation decreases. There seems to be an optimum w/d
point of approximately 0.40 for InP with 0.25um of gold. If w = 80um that
corresponds to d = 177.8 [405]
In order to match the velocities of the electrical and optical waves, one can
manipulate a few parameters electrode thickness, coplanar gap width, anddistributed capacitance along the line. The electrode thickness highly affects
the microwave loss in the structure as shown in fig. 4-14.
145
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
162/237
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
nload (5um)
nload (10um)
nload (20um)
Loss (dB/cm) 5um
Loss (dB/cm) 10um
Loss (dB/cm) 20um
M i c r o w a v e
I n d e x
L o s s ( d B
/ c m
)
Electrode Thickness (um)
Fig. 4-14 Microwave index and loss for loaded CPS line [2000pF/m loading] with differentelectrode widths varying from 5-20 microns
Clearly an electrode thickness exceeding 2m is preferable to reduce both the
microwave index and loss. For the work shown here, the p-metal thickness isapproximately 1.5mm. The loaded-microwave index drops significantly with
electrode thickness although as we have shown before, we would like 3.7-
4.2. This does not take into account the change in effective index when the
area between the center conductor and ground are removed or BCB is
placed below the contacts. Although thickening the electrode improves the
index match, the characteristic impedance is reduced. In order to match the
characteristic impedance and index simultaneously, the capacitance per unit
length of the line must be reduced.
146
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
163/237
Table 4-1Material Relative
PermittivityLoss Tangent (tan d ) Typical
ResistivityInP n 12.4,12.6 5x10-5 20E-4 ohm-cmInP SI 12.4 1.5E7 ohm-cmGaAs 12.85 5x10-4High resistivity Si 11.9 1x10-4 at 30GHz 4000ohm-cmStandard Si 11.9 4x10-3 at 30GHz 1000ohm-cmBCB 2.65
Aluminum Nitride 8.9
Conductor loss can be estimated from the unloaded Q factor
f Z w
Q ou
=
2 [4.14]
Good up to 2 GHz
above 2 GHz one must keep in mind the dielectric attenuation is mostly
dependent upon the substrate thickness. The conductor attenuation coefficientis minimized at a particular w/s. This conductor attenuation decreases with
dielectric constant. The dispersion is lower for smaller waveguide dimensions.
The coplanar waveguide design takes into account the dielectric that the lines
reside, the thickness of the metal layer to achieve a 50 ohm line. As the lines
are deposited on a multilayer dielectric not just on the InP surface, one needs
to take into consideration the effective dielectric constant that insues. This can
be calculated analytically using the conformal mapping technique.[407]
147
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
164/237
As discussed earlier, conductor losses are reduced by using wider and thicker
electrodes. However, the characteristic impedance is improved by going to
thinner and narrower electrodes. A compromise was made using 8 mm wide
electrodes. The gap between the two ridges was designed to be fairly close
(16mm) to shorten the curved waveguides and reduce propagation losses.
LiNbO3 traveling wave modulators usually use CPW transmission lines as
without careful attention to the electrode gap widths have experienced large RF
losses in CPS structures [453]. It has been found [453] that leakage of the CPS
modes into substrate modes may occur at fairly low frequencies (11 and
22GHz). This leakage is due to the geometry of the device (gaps 0.5mm to
1mm on substrates 0.25-0.5mm thick)
The electrical attenuation was measured for different biases without bias on
the laser or SOA. The loss was extracted from the ABCD parameters [see
appendix] after measuring the S parameters of the device. These values
compare closely with other similar EAM devices that report losses in the range
15-20dB/mm at 40GHz. The microwave loss results with bias are shown in fig.
4-15. As can be seen, the microwave loss decreases considerably with
148
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
165/237
reverse bias. This has been attributed to loss due to undepleted material in the
PN junctions25.
Fig 4-15 Microwave loss as a function of frequency and bias from Device #9
As the PN junction depletes out, the loss becomes dominated by ohmic losses
due to the skin depth in the electrodes.
25 Spickermann Dissertation pp 133
149
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
166/237
4.8 CPS T-ELECTRODE DEVICES
Much work has been done to velocity match traveling wave Mach Zehnder
structures using T-sections that both increase the characteristic Impedance
and the length thereby reducing the capacitance per unit length and
providing better matching that results in higher bandwidth.
Modulator n-contact
GeAuNiAun-contact
MZ Phase electrode
Semiconductor Optical Amplifier
SGDBR Laser
Fig. 4-16. T-Electrode SPP-MZ-SOA-SGDBR Transmitter Layout
The device layout of these devices is shown in fig. 4-16 above.
150
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
167/237
By distributing the capacitance using fins, one can lower the capacitance per
unit length at will. However, as the InP/InGaAsP material has considerable
optical loss, and the mismatch becomes greater between the optical andelectrical waves at longer lengths, the Ts designed in this work did not lengthen
the device much. The periodicity of the tabs is related to the cutoff frequency
for a given phase velocity and width[304].
d
v f phasecutoff 2
=
[4.15]
where d is the spacing of the fins (period) and v phase is the phase velocity.
These Ts are 50 m long with 10m spacing between as shown in fig. 4-17.
Fig 4-17 TW electrode structure with 50 m Ts with 10 m gaps
151
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
168/237
This approach is only practical when the capacitance per unit length is already
small. For highly capacitively loaded lines the device length that is required in
order to improve the bandwidth is very large leading to excessive microwaveand optical insertion losses.
In this work a few different CPS transmission line electrode designs were
explored as shown in table 4-2.
Table 4-2 Transmission Line based electrode MZ devices using Dual RF Series Push-pulldrive
#SOAConfig
SOALength
TotalElectrodeLength(um)
ElectrodeWidth
T length(number)
9 Single 400 313 8 50(5)
Activeelectrodelength
Dual 575 400 490.5 8 50(8)
11 Dual 490 500 610 8 50(10)
12 Dual 380 600 734.5 8 50(12)
16 Single 600 400 490.5 8 50(8)
17 Single 500 500 500 15 N/A
18 Single 500 500 500 5 N/A
19 Single 500 500 560 8 100(5)
20 Single 500 500 610 8 50(10)
21 Single 400 600 730.75 8 50(12)
250
10
152
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
169/237
4.9 TRAVELING WAVE BANDWIDTH
The bandwidth of a traveling wave modulator is governed by the difference in
the optical and electrical waves and the overlap factor of these two modes, the
frequency dependent attenuation along the device, the termination impedance,
and the length of the device. Accounting for both the attenuation and the
optical-electrical matching and assuming that the device is terminated with thecharacteristic impedance the bandwidth can be approximated as[4]:
22
22
2/
22
2sin
2sinh
)(
+
+
= -l l
l l
e f B l x a
x a
a wherec f
nn op
x [4.16]m 2
][ -=
It is clear from the previous equation that both the attenuation and indexmatching are very important to achieve high bandwidth. Although simple, the
above equation does not take into account mismatches in the characteristic
impedance which is important as it is difficult to reach 50 ohms with such high
loading capacitance.
The small-signal modulation response S 21 can be modeled accounting for theopto-electrical velocity mismatch, microwave attenuation, and impedance
mismatch[5].
153
-
7/30/2019 Barton Dissertation PDFThe Integration of Mach-Zehnder Modulators with Sampled Grating DBR Lasers
170/237
[ ] 221 )(
1)(exp()2exp(
)(
1)(exp
)2exp(1
+
-+-G+
---
-GG-=
L j
j L L
j L
j L
LT
S LS L m
m
m
m
m
m g b
g b g
g b
g b
g [4.17]
where the amplitude transmission into the modulator is : T , The
reflection coefficients at the source and the load are given by:
S G-= 1
)()(
m s
m sS Z Z
Z Z +
-=G [4.18]
)(
)(
m L
m L L
Z Z
Z Z
+
-=G [4.19]
Zm is the characteristic impedance of the modulator, and Z s and ZL are the
impedances of the source and load respec