BANK MUSCAT SAOG (BKMB - GulfBase.com · BANK MUSCAT SAOG The composition of the loan book for Bank...
Transcript of BANK MUSCAT SAOG (BKMB - GulfBase.com · BANK MUSCAT SAOG The composition of the loan book for Bank...
ANALY
Anil KuVice PEmail: Tel: (+9 GauravAsst. VEmail: Tel: (+9
INVES
YSTS
umar, CAIA resident - Reanilkumar@f
968) 2481665
v Ramaiya Vice Presiden
gaurav@finc968) 2481665
TMENT RE
CO
U
M
esearch fincorp.org
55 Ext. 340
nt - Researchcorp.org 55 Ext. 320
SEARCH
OMPANY
UPDATE
May 11,
2010
BANK
A mild
drop in
earning
substan
opportu
RECOM
CMP (06
TARGET
VARIAN
INVE
Oman’s
financia
recover
likely to
manage
demand
The ban
growth
interest
QoQ as
margina
remaine
sharp r
advanta
BKMB m
headwa
deposit
Q1 2010
million
ratio wa
108%.
We fore
loans &
prudent
MUSCAT
revival in cr
n provision
gs in 201
ntial market
unity to accu
MMENDATION
6‐MAY‐ 2010
T PRICE
NCE
STMENT
s banking se
al crisis, look
ry gains mom
o be one o
ement optim
d for project
nk posted a n
compared
t income gre
s deposits gr
ally by 0.8%
ed conservat
ise in depos
age of a reviv
maintained i
ay to increas
s base, resu
0. Impairme
but substant
as around 5.
ecast a net p
& advances,
t cost contro
SAOG (BK
redit growth
s set to b
0. In our
t decline pro
umulate this
N :
0) :
:
:
OPINION
ector, which
ks set to se
mentum help
f the prima
mistic of a 10
financing as
net profit of
to Q1 2009
ew 11.9% Yo
rew 13.1% Q
% QoQ to RO
tive in lendin
sits during t
val in credit g
its net inter
e the propor
lting in cost
ent for credit
tially lower c
1% at the en
profit of RO
a stable n
ol measures a
KMB.MSM
h and a sha
boost BKMB
r view, a
ovides a go
s stock.
BUY
RO 0.889
RO 1.093
23%
N
h remained
e renewed
ped by gover
ary beneficia
‐12% credit
s well as corp
RO 24.5 mill
9 (after excl
oY in Q1 201
QoQ to RO
O 3.81 billio
ng during the
the quarter
growth later
rest margin
rtion of lowe
of funds de
t losses incre
compared to
nd of Q1 201
105 million i
net interest
and a return
M)
arp
B’s
any
od
relatively r
credit growt
nment spend
aries of this
growth durin
porate loans
lion in Q1 20
uding impac
10 to RO 44.
3.63 billion,
on. While t
e first quarte
allows the
r this year.
at 3.5% in
er cost curren
eclining from
eased margi
o Q4 2009. T
10 while NPL
in FY 2010, a
margin, im
to normal le
CMP (6‐M
MCAP (R
EPS 201
BV 2010
P/E (201
P/BV (2
ROAA (2
ROAE (2
LOANS/
TOTAL A
NETWO
Source:
resilient thro
th in 2010 a
ding. Bank M
economic
ng the year f
.
010, registeri
ct of one‐tim
.4 million, b
, while its lo
this indicate
er of the yea
bank to bra
Q1 2010 as
nt and saving
m 2.1% in Q4
nally by 5.4%
The bank’s N
L coverage r
assuming a 9
mproving fee
evel of provi
FINANCIAL
May‐2010)
RO MN)
10E (RO)
0E (RO)
10E)
010E)
2010E)
2010E)
/DEPOSIT (Q1 2
ASSETS, Q1 201
ORTH, Q1 2010 (
Company Finan
ough the re
as the econ
Muscat (BKM
growth, wit
fuelled by ro
ing an 18.9%
me items).
ut declined
oan book sh
es that the
r, we believe
ace itself to
s the bank m
gs accounts
4 2009 to 2.0
% YoY to RO
NPL / Gross L
atio improve
9% growth in
e‐based inco
sions.
L INDICATORS
2010)
10 (RO Mn)
(RO Mn)
ncial Statement
ecent
omic
MB) is
h its
obust
% YoY
Net
6.8%
hrunk
bank
e the
take
made
in its
0% in
11.8
Loans
ed to
n net
ome,
0.889
1,197
0.078
0.591
11.4
1.5
1.69%
13.94%
105%
6,101
715
ts
F I N C O R P I N V E S T M E N T R E S E A R C H Page 2
BANK MUSCAT SAOG
Downside risks to our estimates can result from lower than anticipated credit growth during the year as well as
a higher credit impairment than expected .
In terms of valuation, BKMB current trades at a P/E multiple of 11.4x its FY 2010 (E) EPS of RO 0.078 and P/BV
multiple of 1.5x its Dec 31, 2010E book value of RO 0.591. Based on a combination of three valuation
methodologies, as explained in the valuation section of this report, we estimate a fair value of RO 1.093 for
the stock achievable by the end of 2010. We therefore recommend a BUY on the stock at or below its
current market price.
BUSINESS MODEL
Bank Muscat SAOG (BKMB), is Oman’s largest bank in terms of total assets, with a strong presence in areas
such as Corporate Banking, Retail Banking, Investment Banking, Treasury, Private Banking and Asset
Management. The bank has the country’s largest network of 125 branches with 362 ATMs, 112 CDMs and
4200 PoS terminals, with presence in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, and a representative office in Dubai. BKMB’s
market capitalization approximates RO 1.19 billion with a total asset base of RO 6.1 billion as of Mar 31, 2010.
The bank’s capital adequacy ratio remained healthy at 15.2% as at the end of Dec 2009.
Bank Muscat owns 49% of BMI Bank B.S.C, an independent bank in the Kingdom of Bahrain, a 43% stake in the
Mangal Keshav Group, one of the oldest and most respected securities houses in the fast‐growing Indian
equities market, besides holding a stake in Silkbank Ltd. in Pakistan.
BKMB’s gross loan book approximated RO 4.03 billion as of Q1 2010, shrinking a marginal 0.5% QoQ compared
to RO 4.05 billion at year end 2009, as the global financial crisis resulted in banks tightening lending growth.
Corporate loans made up 61% of the bank’s loan book in FY 2009, while the remaining 39% was contributed by
personal and housing loans. The bank’s deposit base witnessed a 13.0% QoQ growth in Q1 2010 to RO 3.63
billion compared to RO 3.21 billion in Q4 2009. A higher proportion of the more expensive time deposits in a
bank’s funding structure, as compared to lower cost savings deposits, make it more vulnerable to pressure on
net interest margins in an increasing interest rate environment. Bank Muscat has been making efforts to
reduce the proportion of these higher cost deposits in its deposit base, which has resulted in the proportion of
time deposits reducing from 48% of total deposits in FY 2008 to 43% in Q1 2010.
Services19%
Mining & Quarrying
14%
Manuftr.11%
Real Estate10%
Wholesale & Retail9%
Import Trd.8%
Financial Inst.6%
Utilities6%
Transp.5% Constrc.
4%Govt.1%
Agricultr.0%
Export Trd.0%
Others8%
Figure 1: BKMB corporate loan book (2009)
Source: Company Financial Statements
Deposit Accounts43.1%
Savings Accounts23.1%
Current Accounts25.8%
Call Accounts7.5%
Margin Accounts0.5%
Source: Company Financial Statements
Figure 2: BKMB Deposits Base (Q1 2010)
F I N C O R P I N V E S T M E N T R E S E A R C H Page 3
BANK MUSCAT SAOG
In terms of its NPL / Gross Loans, BKMB is in line with peers like NBO and Bank Dhofar with its NPL / Gross
Loans ratio at 5.13% at the end of Mar 2010 compared to 4.89% and 4.97% for the two peers respectively.
BKMB maintains an adequate level of provisions against bad loans, with a loan loss coverage ratio of 108% at
the end of Mar 31, 2010.
Major shareholders in Bank Muscat continue to be The Royal Court of Affairs with a 24.8% stake and Dubai
Financial Group with a 15.0% stake.
Q1 2010 PERFORMANCE
Bank Muscat reported a 11.9% YoY growth in its net interest income in Q1 2010 to RO 44.4 million. On a
sequential basis however, net interest income declined 6.8% as the loan book shrunk marginally and average
yield on loans and advances declined from 5.9% in Q4 2009 to 5.6% in Q1 2010. Net interest margin dipped
from 3.9% in Q4 2009 to 3.6% in Q1 2010.
The pressure on net interest margin due to a decline in the average yield has been mitigated slightly by a
decline in average cost of funds. On a YoY basis, the bank has been able to lower its cost of funds from 2.7% in
Q1 2009 to 2.0% in Q1 2010. On a sequential basis also, cost of funds was lower compared to 2.1% in Q4
2009. This lower cost of funds has been a result of the pro active efforts of the bank to increase the proportion
of lower cost savings and current accounts in its deposit base.
Q1 2010 results indicate that most banks in Oman have remained conservative in lending during the first
quarter, with the exception of Ahli Bank and Bank Sohar, which witnessed a 13.9% and 4.3% QoQ growth in
their net loans and advances respectively. Bank Muscat witnessed a marginal QoQ decline of 0.8% in its net
loans & advances in Q1 2010, which indicates that the bank has remained conservative in lending during the
first quarter of this year. While that poses a risk to net interest margins going forward, we remain relatively
confident that the bank should be able to achieve a 8‐9% growth in its loan book in the coming quarters as the
economy recovers and sustained government spending improves demand for credit in the domestic market.
3.6%
2.7%
2.3%
2.0%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
2007 2008 2009 Q1 2010
CASA / Time Deposits Average cost of funds
Figure 3: BKMB ‐ Trend of CASA vs. Cost of Funding
Source: Company Financial Statements
F I N C O R P I N V E S T M E N T R E S E A R C H Page 4
BANK MUSCAT SAOG
The composition of the loan book for Bank Muscat has remained very stable over the last five quarters, with
corporate loans making up around 60% of gross loans, while 40% is made up of personal and housing loans.
As shown in Table 2 below, Bank Sohar and Ahli Bank had the lowest NPL ratios among banks in Oman at the
end of December 2009. NPL exposure for Bank Muscat appears in line with peers like NBO and Bank Dhofar
around 5.0%, while OIB’s NPL ratio remained an outlier in the sector at 10.7%. Bank Muscat’s NPL coverage at
the end of Q1 2010 remained comfortable at 108% while capital adequacy ratio has been healthy at 15.2%,
giving the bank an adequate cushion against business risk.
TABLE 2: NPL/GROSS LOANS
Q2 09 Q3 09 Q4 09 Q1 10 AVERAGE
BANK SOHAR 0.33% 0.27% 0.24% 0.35% 0.32%
BANK MUSCAT 4.76% 5.01% 4.98% 5.13% 4.39%
NATIONAL BANK OF OMAN 4.68% 4.81% 5.02% 4.89% 4.74%
AHLI BANK ‐ ‐ 0.32% ‐ 0.32%
BANK DHOFAR 3.76% 3.77% 4.81% 4.97% 3.95%
OMAN INTERNATIONAL BANK 9.11% 10.11% 10.54% 10.76% 9.73%
Source: Company Financial Statements
5.65% 5.66% 5.69%
5.81%
5.51%
5.35%
5.40%
5.45%
5.50%
5.55%
5.60%
5.65%
5.70%
5.75%
5.80%
5.85%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Q1 2009 Q2 2009 Q3 2009 Q4 2009 Q1 2010
Personal & Housing Corporate & Other Average yield on loans
Source: Company Financial Statements
Figure 4: BKMB ‐ Loan Book Composition (Q1 09 ‐ Q1 10)
TABLE 1 : INCREMENTAL LOAN GROWTH
Q2 09 Q3 09 Q4 09 Q1 10 AVERAGE
BANK SOHAR 8.6% 2.4% 3.9% 4.3% 4.8%
BANK MUSCAT 0.9% ‐2.2% 3.0% ‐0.8% 0.2%
NATIONAL BANK OF OMAN ‐1.6% ‐1.0% ‐1.2% 1.4% ‐0.6%
AHLI BANK 0.5% 11.0% 9.3% 13.9% 8.7%
BANK DHOFAR 4.4% 4.4% 2.4% 0.5% 2.9%
OMAN INTERNATIONAL BANK 2.0% 2.6% ‐5.7% ‐0.5% ‐0.4%
Source: Company Financial Statements
F I N C O R P I N V E S T M E N T R E S E A R C H Page 5
BANK MUSCAT SAOG
Bank Muscat witnessed the highest growth in deposits during Q1 2010, compared to peers, with total deposits
growing 13.1% QoQ to RO 3.63 billion. This aggressive growth in its deposit base is likely an attempt by the
bank to prepare for a recovery in the domestic credit market during 2010, which bodes well for earnings going
forward. Management has indicated that it expects credit growth in 2010 between 10‐12%, fuelled by robust
demand for project finance lending, while continuing to focus on lending to key sectors like Power, Oil & Gas
and Telecoms.
Non‐interest income of RO 17.3 million in Q1 2010 was 15.0% higher compared to Q1 2009, after excluding the
RO 35.3 million post‐tax gain on sale HDFC Bank investment and RO 7.5 million realised losses on Available‐for‐
Sale investments last year. On a QoQ basis, non‐interest income grew 2.7% from RO 16.9 million. Fee based
income in Q1 2010 was RO 13.7 million or approximately 22% as a percentage of total operating income. Fee
income has historically averaged 20‐22% of total operating income for BKMB, dipping to 17% in FY 2009 due to
the economic slowdown, but managing to recover to 22% in Q1 2010. We expect the bank to achieve a similar
proportion of fee income during FY 2010 and through FY 2012.
Operating expenses increased 15.5% YoY and 37.3% QoQ driven by the expansion in the banks delivery
channels, investment in technology and increase in manpower costs. Cost to income ratio increased from
35.6% in FY 2009 to 39.9% in Q1 2010 as a result of the increase in operating expenses. This resulted in a
20.5% decline in operating profit on QoQ basis from RO 46.5 million to RO 37 million. Impairment for credit
losses increased marginally by 5.4% YoY to RO 11.8 million, while registering a sharp 68.7% decline compared
to Q4 2009 when the bank took its major provisions last year.
Net profit in Q1 2010 approximated RO 24.5 million, registering an 18.9% growth compared to Q1 2009, after
excluding the above mentioned one‐time items.
TABLE 3 : INCREMENTAL DEPOSIT GROWTH
Q2 09 Q3 09 Q4 09 Q1 10 AVERAGE
BANK SOHAR 15.5% ‐1.4% 17.5% ‐6.5% 6.3%
BANK MUSCAT ‐0.4% 2.6% ‐2.7% 13.1% 3.2%
NATIONAL BANK OF OMAN ‐8.1% ‐4.9% 1.3% 8.9% ‐0.7%
AHLI BANK ‐3.4% 13.7% 28.2% 4.3% 10.7%
BANK DHOFAR 0.4% 6.0% 5.0% 6.9% 4.6%
OMAN INTERNATIONAL BANK ‐2.4% 0.4% 2.0% ‐0.9% ‐0.2%
Source: Company Financial Statements
TABLE 4: CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT A GLANCE
IN (RO ‘000) Q1 2010 Q4 2009
NET LOANS AND ADVANCES 3,808 3,838
INCREMENTAL CHANGE (QoQ) ‐0.8% 3.0%
TOTAL DEPOSITS 3,628 3,208
LOANS/DEPOSITS RATIO 105% 120%
NPL/GROSS LOANS 5.13% 4.98%
DUE FROM BANKS/DUE TO BANKS 82% 73%
SHARE CAPITAL 135 108
RETAINED EARNINGS 97 121
TOTAL SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY 715 711
BOOK VALUE PER SHARE (RO) 0.531 0.660
Source: Company financial statements
F I N C O R P I N V E S T M E N T R E S E A R C H Page 6
BANK MUSCAT SAOG
STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE
BKMB has clearly outperformed the MSM 30 index with a one year return of 58% as against 29% from the
Index as of May 6, 2010.
FINANCIAL FORECAST (2010E – 2012E)
29%
58%
‐30.0%
‐20.0%
‐10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
6‐May‐09 18‐Jul‐09 29‐Sep‐09 11‐Dec‐09 22‐Feb‐10 6‐May‐10
Source: MSM
MSM 30 INDEX BKMB
Figure 5: One year performance BKMB vs MSM Index (May 6, 2009 ‐May 6 2010)
INCOME STATEMENT(RO millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Q1 10 Q2 10 (E) Q3 10 (E) Q4 10 (E) FY 2010 (E) FY 2011 (E) FY 2012 (E)
Interest income 218 263 280 68 70 71 73 282 336 403
Interest expense (93) (101) (105) (23) (24) (24) (25) (97) (125) (162)
Net interest income 125 162 174 44 45 47 48 185 212 241
Incremental change (%) 25% 30% 8% ‐7% 2% 4% 3% 6% 15% 14%
Fees and commissions (net) 38 55 50 14 14 14 14 56 61 67
% of total operating income 22% 23% 17% 22% 22% 21% 21% 22% 21% 20%
Investment gains 2 8 53 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.5 1.2 3.0 4.0
Other operating income 9 12 13 4 4 4 4 16 19 23
Total operating income 173 237 291 62 63 65 67 257 295 336
Operating expenses (66) (78) (76) (23) (20) (21) (21) (85) (94) (108)
Depreciation (4) (6) (7) (2) (2) (2) (2) (8) (9) (10)
Cost to income ratio 40.7% 35.6% 35.6% 39.9% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 36.2% 35% 35%
Provisions for credit losses (18) (25) (98) (12) (13) (12) (12) (49) (48) (38)
Provisions for investment impairments 0 (11) (3) (0.1) 0 0 0 (0) 0 0
Recoveries from provisions 8 13 11 3 0 0 0 3 0 0
Share of profit (loss) from associates 5 (3) (10) 1 1 1 1 4 4 5
Impairment of associates 0 (14) (20) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other items 0 (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Profit before tax 98 108 88 29 30 31 32 122 148 186
Tax expense (13) (15) (14) (4) (4) (4) (4) (17) (20) (25)
Effective tax rate 13.8% 13.5% 16.2% 15.1% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.9% 13.5% 13.5%
Net profit 84 94 74 24 26 27 28 105 128 161
Earnings Per Share (EPS) 0.090 0.087 0.068 0.018 0.019 0.020 0.021 0.078 0.095 0.118
F I N C O R P I N V E S T M E N T R E S E A R C H Page 7
BANK MUSCAT SAOG
BALANCE SHEET(RO millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Q1 10 Q2 10 (E) Q3 10 (E) Q4 10 (E) FY 2010 (E) FY 2011 (E) FY 2012 (E)
Net Loans and advances 2,687 3,728 3,838 3,808 3,957 4,070 4,188 4,188 4,674 5,384
Incremental change 46% 39% 3% ‐1% 4% 3% 3% 9% 12% 15%
Total deposits 2,336 3,235 3,208 3,628 3,646 3,664 3,682 3,682 4,235 4,870
Incremental change 26% 38% ‐1% 13% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 15% 15% 15%
Cash & bank balances 488 453 608 873 897 923 950 950 1,035 1,147
Placements with banks 588 1,078 1,016 1,006 1,006 1,006 1,006 1,006 1,006 1,006
Investments ‐ AFS 86 217 120 122 122 122 122 122 122 122
Investments ‐ Held to maturity 32 162 24 23 23 23 23 23 23 23
Total assets 4,218 6,028 5,851 6,101 6,274 6,414 6,558 6,558 7,129 7,950
Deposits from banks 663 1,413 1,396 1,233 1,233 1,233 1,233 1,233 1,233 1,233
Total liabilities 3,590 5,313 5,139 5,385 5,533 5,646 5,762 5,762 6,245 6,953
Share capital 108 108 108 135 135 135 135 135 135 137
Share premium 302 302 302 302 302 302 302 302 302 316
Mandatory convertible bonds 0 0 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 16
General reserve 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56
Legal reserve 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36
Revaluation reserve 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Subordinated loan reserve 3 24 48 48 48 48 70 70 107 144
Cumulative changes in fair value 10 69 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Foreign current translation reserve 0 (9) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)
Retained earnings 109 125 121 97 123 150 156 156 207 284
Total shareholder's equity 628 715 711 715 741 768 796 796 884 997
Book Value Per Share (BV) 0.583 0.664 0.660 0.531 0.550 0.570 0.591 0.591 0.656 0.730
KEY RATIOS & METRICS(Per share data in RO) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Q1 10 Q2 10 (E) Q3 10 (E) Q4 10 (E) FY 2010 (E) FY 2011 (E) FY 2012 (E)
Average yield on loans 7.4% 6.3% 5.6% 5.5% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 6.1% 6.6%
Average cost of funds 3.6% 2.7% 2.3% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.4% 2.8%
Net interest margin 3.8% 3.6% 3.3% 3.5% 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 3.7% 3.8%
Cost / Income ratio 40.7% 35.6% 35.6% 39.9% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 36.2% 35.0% 35.0%
Loans / Deposits ratio 115% 115% 120% 105% 109% 111% 114% 114% 110% 111%
Due from banks / Due to banks 89% 76% 73% 82% 82% 82% 82% 82% 82% 82%
NPL / Gross loans 2.7% 2.3% 5.0% 5.1% 5.0% 4.8% 4.5% 4.5% 4.0% 3.0%
NPL Coverage 146% 139% 106% 108% 113% 120% 130% 130% 155% 202%
Provisions for credit losses / NPL 24% 27% 49% 6% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 24% 24.0% 22.0%
ROAA (%) 2.3% 1.8% 1.2% 0.8% 1.1% 1.1% 1.7% 1.7% 1.9% 2.1%
ROAE (%) 17.8% 14.0% 10.3% 7.1% 8.9% 9.5% 13.9% 13.9% 15.3% 17.1%
Earnings per share (EPS) ‐ Diluted 0.090 0.087 0.067 0.018 0.019 0.020 0.021 0.078 0.095 0.118
Book value per share (BV) 0.583 0.664 0.660 0.531 0.550 0.570 0.591 0.591 0.656 0.730
Cash dividend per share (DPS) 0.050 0.020 0.020 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.030 0.035 0.035
F I N C O R P I N V E S T M E N T R E S E A R C H Page 8
BANK MUSCAT SAOG
VALUATION
Residual Income Model
The Residual Income approach to valuation is based on adding the discounted sum of excess return over its
cost of equity for each year in the future to its present shareholders net worth.
This approach, is based on the concept of economic profit, which assumes that excess earnings generated by a
company over its cost of equity will dimish over time as the firm’s competitive advantage is lost and the return
on equity generated will decline closer to the firms cost of equity in the long run.
For BKMB, on a conservative basis, we forecast ROE to peak at 22% in 2014, 2015 and thereafter gradually
decline closer to its cost of equity of 11.1% by 2019. Based on this approach, we arrive at a discounted value
of residual earnings of approximately RO 698 million. Total equity value is estimated to be RO 1.413 billion
after including the current networth of RO 715 million, impliying a target price estimate of RO 1.049.
Relative Valuation
Despite a sharp runup in price in recent weeks, Bank Muscat still trades significantly below the average P/BV
multiple of 2.09x for the Omani banking sector at 1.67x its book value at the end of Q1 2010. We
conservatively estimate the bank to report a book value of RO 0.591 and RO 0.655 at end of 2010 and 2011
which implies forward multiples of 1.5x and 1.4x respectively.
Applying the average P/BV multiple of 2.09x to its 2010E estimated book value of RO 0.591, we arrive at a
target price of RO 1.236 for BKMB.
TABLE 5: RESIDUAL INCOME MODEL9mn 2010 (E) FY 2011 (E) FY 2012 (E) FY 2013 (E) FY 2014 (E) FY 2015 (E) FY 2016 (E) FY 2017 (E) FY 2018 (E) FY 2019 (E)
Net profit 81 128 161 249 352 451 512 525 502 444
ROE 14% 15% 16% 20% 22% 22% 20% 17% 14% 11%
Ending book value 796 884 997 1,247 1,598 2,049 2,561 3,086 3,588 4,032
Cost of equity 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1%
Equity charge (63) (94) (105) (125) (159) (203) (257) (315) (372) (425)
Residual income 17 35 56 124 193 247 255 210 130 19
Discounted value 16 29 42 84 117 135 125 92 52 7
Current BV 715
Disc. Res. Inc. 698
Equity value 1,413
Value / share (RO) 1.049
Source: FINCORP Investment Research
F I N C O R P I N V E S T M E N T R E S E A R C H Page 9
BANK MUSCAT SAOG
TABLE 6: RELATIVE VALUATION
INDICATORS BKMB BKDB NBOB OIBB ABOB BKSB AVERAGE
P/E 2010 Ann 12.20 18.61 13.97 11.87 16.05 21.02 15.62
P/BV (Q1 2010) 1.67 3.26 1.51 1.70 2.22 2.19 2.09
DIV YIELD 2.3% 1.9% 3.5% 7.5% 2.5% 0.0% 2.9%
Mcap/Net loans 0.31 0.55 0.27 0.44 0.40 0.29 0.38
ROE (TTM) 7.0% 13.7% 8.3% 14.3% 11.3% 10.7% 10.9%
Source: Company Financial Statements
Justified Price‐to‐Book Value Multiple
The Justified P/BV valuation approach estimates a fair P/BV multiple for the
investment, based on forecasted fundamentals of the operating business.
This fair P/BV multiple is used as a basis for the target price estimate of the
stock.
In case of BKMB, we forecast long‐term sustainable ROE of 15% assuming a
5.5% growth rate and cost of equity at 11.15%. Based on these fundamental
forecasts, we estimate a justified P/BV multiple of 1.68x for the stock, which
implies a target price of RO 0.994.
As seen in table 8 below, based on the three valuation approaches, our overall target price estimate for BKMB
works out to RO 1.093, implying a 23% upside from the current market price of RO 0.889 as of May 6, 2010.
TABLE 8: TARGET PRICE
Method Weight Fair Value
Residual Income Model 33% 1.049
Relative Valuation (P/BV) 33% 1.236
Justified P/BV 33% 0.994
Expected Fair Value Per Share (RO) 1.093
Source: FINCORP Investment Research
TABLE 7: JUSTIFIED P/BV
Sustainable ROE 15.00%
Growth rate (g) 5.5%
Cost of equity (Ke) 11.15%
Beta 1.05
Rm ‐ Rf 6.08%
Rf 4.77%
Justified P/BV 1.68
BV 2010 0.591
Target Price 0.994
Source: FINCORP Investment Research
F I N C O R P I N V E S T M E N T R E S E A R C H Page 10
BANK MUSCAT SAOG
COMPARATIVE FINANCIALS
Bank credit in Oman continued to grow in 2009 despite the global economic slowdown posting a 6.2%
increase to RO 9.83 billion from RO 9.25 billion at the end of December 2008. We analyze below the relative
performance of banks in our peer group comprising of Bank Muscat, NBO, Bank Dhofar, OIB, Oman Arab
Bank, Bank Sohar and Ahli Bank on key banking parameters
During the past four quarters, Ahli Bank reported the highest average incremental growth in loan book of
8.7% in our peer group while it posted a QoQ growth of 13.9% in Q1 2010. Its closest competitor Bank Sohar
reported an average incremental loan growth of 4.8% in the past four quarters and a 4.3% QoQ growth in Q1
2010. Among larger banks, BKDB has seen an average incremental loan book growth of 2.9% in the
preceding four quarters while industry leader BKMB’s loan book grew at just 0.2%.
Bank Muscat led the sector in terms of both loans and deposits with a market share of 44% and 39%
respectively at the end of 2009. NBO and Bank Dhofar are placed close to each other with market shares of
15% and 14% respectively by loans while in terms of deposits they commanded a share of 15% and 13%
respectively.
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
Q1 09 Q2 09 Q3 09 Q4 09 Q1 2010
Source: Company Financial Statements
Figure 6: Incremental loan growth
ABOB BKDB BKMB BKSB NBOB OAB OIBB
F I N C O R P I N V E S T M E N T R E S E A R C H Page 11
BANK MUSCAT SAOG
In terms of average incremental deposit growth during the past four quarters, Bank Sohar leads the sector
with a growth rate of 10.9% followed closely by Ahli Bank at 10.7%. Customer deposits held by Bank Muscat
grew at an average rate of 3.2% while NBO reported a 0.7% average sequential decline in deposits in the
past four quarters.
In terms of loans‐to‐deposit ratio, Bank Muscat topped the sector with 119.7% at the end of 2009 while
Oman Arab Bank has been the most conservative in lending with a ratio of 81.3%. The average loans‐to‐
deposit ratio for the Omani banking sector stood at 98.1%
ABOB5%
BKDB14%
BKMB44%
BKSB9%
NBOB15%
OAB6%
OIBB7%
Figure 7: Market share by loans and advances in Q4 2009
Source: Company Financial Statements
ABOB6%
BKDB13%
BKMB39%
BKSB10%
NBOB15%
OAB8%
OIBB9%
Figure 8: Market share by customer deposits in Q4 2009
Source: Company Financial Statements
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
Q1 09 Q2 09 Q3 09 Q4 09 Q1 2010
Source: Company Financial Statements
Figure 9: Incremental deposit growth
ABOB BKDB BKMB BKSB NBOB OAB OIBB
F I N C O R P I N V E S T M E N T R E S E A R C H Page 12
BANK MUSCAT SAOG
BKMB enjoyed the lowest cost‐to‐income ratio in the sector at 35.6% In 2009 (excluding one‐time realized
investment gains/losses) followed closely by Bank Dhofar at 36.4% while at the other end of the spectrum
are placed Bank Sohar at 59.1% and OIB at 45.1%. The average cost‐to‐income ratio for the sector in 2009
was 42.6% ,
The average net interest spread for the sector in 2009 was 4.2% led by Oman Arab Bank at 5.7% and
followed by OIB at 5.4%. Ahli Bank had the lowest spread at 3.2%. The six listed banks in Oman had an
average return on equity of 10.1% at the end of 2009. BKDB and OIBB delivered a high ROE in excess of 12%
while Bank Sohar was at the bottom at 7.6%.
119.7%
108.4% 107.9%
95.0%90.3%
84.2% 81.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
140.0%
BKMB BKDB NBOB ABOB BKSB OIBB OAB
Figure 10: Loans/Deposits Ratio 2009
Source: Company Financial Statements
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
BKMB BKDB NBOB OIBB ABOB BKSB
Source: Company Financial Statements
Figure 11: Cost to Income Ratio, Net Interest Spread and ROE
Cost to income Ratio (RHS) Net interest spread (LHS) ROE (LHS)
F I N C O R P I N V E S T M E N T R E S E A R C H Page 13
BANK MUSCAT SAOG
INVESTMENT RESEARCH
CONTACT DETAILS Anil Kumar, CAIA VP – Research (+968) 24816655 Ext: 340 [email protected] Gaurav Ramaiya AVP (+968) 24816655 Ext: 320 [email protected]
Mable Pereira Analyst (+968) 24816655 Ext: 323 [email protected] Sarah Al Siyabi Analyst (+968) 24816655 Ext: 318 [email protected]
BROKERAGE/CUSTOMER CARE
CONTACT DETAILS Issam Ali Baqer Broker (+968) 24822300 Ext: 332 Fax: (+968) 24822390 Abdul Kareem Online trading (+968) 24822300 Ext: 306 [email protected]
Disclaimer
The research team of The Financial Corporation, SAOG (hereto referred as FINCORP) has prepared the information, analysis and
expressed its opinion on the subject matter of this report. The information contained has been obtained from sources believed to be
reliable and in good faith, but which may not be verified independently. While utmost care has been taken in preparing the above
report, FINCORP makes no guarantee, representation or warranty, whether express or implied, and accepts no responsibility or liability
as to its accuracy or completeness of the data, being provided. All investment information and opinions are subject to change without
notice. The investor will indemnify FINCORP and its directors, officers, and employees against any loss or damage or other liabilities
(including costs), which they may suffer as a result of reliance on this report. This report is not to be relied upon in substitution for the
exercise of independent judgment.
Also, not all customers may receive the material at the same time. This document is for private circulation and information purposes
only. It does not and should not be construed as an offer to buy or sell securities mentioned herein. FINCORP will not be liable for any
direct or indirect losses arising from the use thereof, and the investors are expected to use the information contained herein at their
own risk. FINCORP and its affiliates or their officers, directors and employees may own or have positions in any investment mentioned
herein or any investment related thereto and from time to time add to or dispose of any such investment. FINCORP and its affiliates
may act as market maker or assume an underwriting position in the securities of banking companies discussed herein (or investments
related thereto), and may sell them to or buy them from customers on a principal basis and may also perform or seek to perform
investment banking or underwriting services for or relating to those banking companies. Authors or contributors of this report could
have direct interest in the capital market or in the securities mentioned herein.
The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own
investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position, and using such independent advisors, as they
believe necessary. Income from investments may fluctuate. The price or value of the investments, to which this report relates, either
directly or indirectly, may fall or rise against the interest of investors. This document is strictly for the use of recipients only. None of
the material provided herein may be reproduced, rewritten, rehashed, published, resold or distributed in any manner whatsoever
without the prior and explicit written permission of FINCORP.