ATHWAYS ONSULTING - Vermont

PATHWAYS CONSULTING, LLC Planning • Civil & Environmental Engineering • Surveying • Construction Assistance

240 Mechanic Street • Suite 100 Lebanon, New Hampshire 03766

(603) 448-2200 • Fax: (603) 448-1221

July 17, 2014 Mike Davidson 31 Elm Street Lebanon, New Hampshire 03766 RE: LIMITED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION, FORMER COLLEGE CLEANERS

SITE, 241 SOUTH MAIN STREET, HARTFORD, VERMONT (Project No. 12507) Dear Mike: We have completed a limited subsurface investigation at the referenced site in support of your due diligence investigation prior to purchasing the property. This report summarizes our findings and conclusions. Property Description and Background: KAS Environmental Science & Engineering completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) on the subject site, dated December 24, 2013. That ESA identified several recognized environmental conditions, including: • The most current use of the property as a dry cleaning operation; • The historic use of the property as an automotive repair shop; • An existing floor drain/trench system inside the building associated with the washer

operation; and • A Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation

listed hazardous waste site adjoining the property to the east that historically operated as a railroad and bulk fuel facility.

Information contained within the ESA indicated that previous investigations in the area identified a localized groundwater flow direction toward the northwest. The site is dominated by a topographic high immediately west of the site and the Connecticut River that forms a loop on the south, east, and north. Soils on-site are characterized by the USDA NRCS soil mapping as an urban land-Windsor-Agawam complex. These soils tend to be well-drained soils with significant depth to bedrock and groundwater. We walked through the building on June 24, 2014 and we reviewed the majority of the interior ground floor spaces. Although much of the equipment had been sold at auction and was being removed, in general the following conditions were noted: • It appeared that the dry cleaning equipment and supplies were located against the

northeast wall. • The washing machines were located over the trench drain on the northwest wall. The

trench drain system appears to have included a circulating loop for heating, makeup water, and a discharge of wastewater to the municipal sewer via piping.

Mike Davidson RE: LIMITED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION, FORMER COLLEGE CLEANERS SITE, 241 SOUTH MAIN

STREET, HARTFORD, VERMONT (Project No. 12507) July 17, 2014

• The water entrance and the utility room are located in the central portion of the building. • Empty storage, office, and unused commercial space occupy the majority of the southern

portion of the building (the concrete block portion). • A 1,000-gallon fuel oil aboveground storage tank (AST) is located in an outbuilding on

the northwest building corner. It is installed on a concrete floor, piping enters the top of the tank, and all piping between the AST and the building is routed through an oversized PVC piping secondary containment system.

• The exterior storage area and garage appear to have miscellaneous solid waste debris scattered throughout.

Site Investigation and Sampling Plan: Based on the preliminary site reconnaissance and review of the previously referenced ESA, it is our opinion that the fuel oil AST installation and the trench drain system for the washing operations are not highly likely to have caused measurable contamination on the property. In our opinion, the primary mechanisms of contamination impacting the subject property are the possible release of dry cleaning fluids during normal operations with migration through floor and foundation joints, and historic migration of petroleum contaminants onto the property from off-site locations. The site investigation and sampling plan were established to identify the likelihood of these primary environmental concerns being present at the site. On July 7, 2014, we met on-site with two Town of Hartford Public Works Department representatives to review the locations of municipal storm drains, water, and sewer. DigSafe had previously reviewed the site (Ticket No. 20142702833). Eastern Analytical arrived on-site to complete push probes at the marked locations using a truck-mounted Earth Probe 2001 drilling rig. Eight subsurface borings were planned, but seven were actually completed (refer to Figure 1 and the attached photographic log) to a depth of 12 feet using push-probe technology as follows: • Boring-1 was completed in the gravel parking lot at roughly the center in the north

portion adjacent to the concrete portion of the pavement. Continuous sampling was completed to 12 feet and no soil staining or odor were detected. Soil samples were collected at four feet and 10 to 12 feet. They were field screened using headspace sampling and a Thermo Environmental Instruments photoionization detector (PID) Model 580 EZ with a 10.2 ev bulb. The samples were non-detect.

• Boring-2 was completed in the gravel parking lot at the northeast corner of the building. Continuous sampling was completed to 12 feet and no soil staining or odor were detected. Soil samples were collected at four feet and 10 to 12 feet, and they were field screened using headspace sampling and the PID. Both samples initially showed trace readings of less than two ppm.

• Boring-3 was completed approximately five feet east of the building wall, and roughly 20 feet from the front of the building (at the start of the interior dry cleaning equipment). Continuous sampling was completed to 12 feet and no soil staining or odor were detected. Soil samples were collected at 10 to 12 feet, and they were field screened using headspace sampling and the PID. The samples were non-detect. A sample from the 10 to 12 feet soils was composited for laboratory analysis.

• Boring-4 was completed approximately five feet east of the building wall, and roughly 35 feet from the front of the building (about midway relative to the interior dry cleaning equipment). Continuous sampling was completed to 12 feet and no soil staining or odor

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight



were detected. Soil samples were collected at 10 to 12 feet, and they were field screened using headspace sampling and the PID. The samples were non-detect. A sample from the 10 to 12 feet soils was composited for laboratory analysis.

• Boring-5 was completed approximately five feet east of the building wall, and roughly 50 feet from the front of the building (at the southernmost extent of the interior dry cleaning equipment). Continuous sampling was completed to 12 feet and no soil staining or odor were detected. Soil samples were collected at 10 to 12 feet, and they were field screened using headspace sampling and the PID. The samples were non-detect. A sample from the 10 to 12 feet soils was composited for laboratory analysis.

• Boring-6 was completed approximately three feet east and north of the loading dock (at about the location of the interior utility room). Continuous sampling was completed to 12 feet. The boring showed black soil staining between 16 and 24 inches, but there was no odor, evidence of petroleum, or positive reading on the PID screening. Soil samples were collected at 10 to 12 feet, and there were field screened using headspace sampling and the PID. The samples were non-detect. A sample from the 10 to 12 feet soils was composited for laboratory analysis.

• Boring-7 had been planned within the planting bed adjacent to the unused portion of the building formerly used for commercial and office space. This boring could not be completed because of the unknown location for the sanitary sewer service line and a possible second water service line along this portion of the building.

• Boring-8 was completed as closely to the AST outbuilding as possible, on the northwest corner of the main building. Continuous sampling was completed to 12 feet and no soil staining or odor were detected. Soil samples were collected at four feet and 10 to 12 feet, and they were field screened using headspace sampling and the PID. The samples were non-detect.

• All headspace samples were allowed to equilibrate for an additional hour and were re-screened with the PID. All samples in all locations were non-detect.

• All soil columns were generally fine sand with lenses of coarse sands and small gravels. No refusal or groundwater was encountered to depth in any of the borings.

Laboratory Analysis: Composite soil samples were collected from borings B-3, B-4, B-5, and B-6 from the 10 to 12 foot depth range (the bottom of the boring and below the building footing depth). These samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds using Method 8260B, gasoline range volatile organic compounds using Method 8015C MOD (GRO), and total petroleum hydrocarbons, diesel range using Method 8015C (DRO). A trip blank was also analyzed as part of the overall quality control/assurance protocol. The 8260B method would have identified any petroleum hydrocarbons and compounds associated with dry cleaning operations. The 8015 methods would further identify the potential for fuel contamination due to gasoline or heavier fuels being present at the site along the common boundary with the former bulk plant site. All of the analyses were below detection limits for the compounds analyzed. Copies of the laboratory report and the sample chain-of-custody sheet are attached. Conclusions and Recommendations: All portions of the site were not fully accessible for subsurface invasive investigations. However, it is our opinion that the limited Phase II site investigation described previously herein was adequate to detect the presence of contamination from historic site operations, the most recent drycleaning operations, or off-site migration of

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight



12507.PhaseIIESA.rpt.rwr

petroleum contamination onto the property. Based on our field reconnaissance of the property, the lack of any widespread soil staining or other visible evidence of contamination at the boring locations, the results of soil field screening with the PID, and the below detection limits laboratory analysis of soil samples, it is our conclusion that measurable contamination is not present within the areas sampled, and that no further site investigation or sampling is necessary at this time. There is no evidence to suggest that historic site operations have resulted in any release of contamination to the property. We trust that this report provides you with the information that you require for your due diligence property review. We are providing you with two original copies of this report for your files and use. Please feel free to contact us if you require further clarification on any portion of this report. Thank you again for the opportunity to assist you in your property evaluation. Sincerely, PATHWAYS CONSULTING, LLC Russell W. Rohloff, P.E. Director of Environmental Services RWR:mam Enclosures

Soil Map—Windsor County, Vermont(241 South Main Street WRJ)

Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Web Soil SurveyNational Cooperative Soil Survey

7/7/2014Page 1 of 3

4835

940

4835

950

4835

960

4835

970

4835

980

4835

990

4836

000

4836

010

4836

020

4836

030

4835

950

4835

960

4835

970

4835

980

4835

990

4836

000

4836

010

4836

020

4836

030

716210 716220 716230 716240 716250 716260 716270 716280

716220 716230 716240 716250 716260 716270 716280

43° 38' 45'' N72

° 1

9' 9

'' W43° 38' 45'' N

72° 1

9' 5

'' W

43° 38' 42'' N

72° 1

9' 9

'' W

43° 38' 42'' N

72° 1

9' 5

'' W

N

Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS840 20 40 80 120

Feet0 5 10 20 30

MetersMap Scale: 1:465 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION

Area of Interest (AOI)Area of Interest (AOI)

SoilsSoil Map Unit Polygons

Soil Map Unit Lines

Soil Map Unit Points

Special Point FeaturesBlowout

Borrow Pit

Clay Spot

Closed Depression

Gravel Pit

Gravelly Spot

Landfill

Lava Flow

Marsh or swamp

Mine or Quarry

Miscellaneous Water

Perennial Water

Rock Outcrop

Saline Spot

Sandy Spot

Severely Eroded Spot

Sinkhole

Slide or Slip

Sodic Spot

Spoil Area

Stony Spot

Very Stony Spot

Wet Spot

Other

Special Line Features

Water FeaturesStreams and Canals

TransportationRails

Interstate Highways

US Routes

Major Roads

Local Roads

BackgroundAerial Photography

The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000.

Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can causemisunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil lineplacement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrastingsoils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.

Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for mapmeasurements.

Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceWeb Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.govCoordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)

Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercatorprojection, which preserves direction and shape but distortsdistance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as theAlbers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accuratecalculations of distance or area are required.

This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as ofthe version date(s) listed below.

Soil Survey Area: Windsor County, VermontSurvey Area Data: Version 17, Dec 22, 2013

Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000or larger.

Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 10, 2011—Oct 8,2011

The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines werecompiled and digitized probably differs from the backgroundimagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shiftingof map unit boundaries may be evident.

Soil Map—Windsor County, Vermont(241 South Main Street WRJ)



7/7/2014Page 2 of 3

Map Unit Legend

Windsor County, Vermont (VT027)

Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI

5E Windsor loamy fine sand, 25 to60 percent slopes

0.0 2.5%

32B Urban land-Windsor-Agawamcomplex, 0 to 8 percentslopes

0.6 97.5%

Totals for Area of Interest 0.6 100.0%

Soil Map—Windsor County, Vermont 241 South Main Street WRJ



7/7/2014Page 3 of 3

B1

B2

B6

B5

B4

B3 B8

PATHWAYS CONSULTING, LLC 240 MECHANIC STREET, SUITE 100 LEBANON, NH 03766 (603) 448-2200 FAX (603) 448-1221

PREPARED BY: DAT DATE: JULY 2014 PROJECT NUMBER: 12507

FIGURE

1NH GRANIT SITE AERIAL MAP

COLLEGE CLEANERS 241 SOUTH MAIN STREET

WHITE RIVER JUNCTION, VERMONT

PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG 241 SOUTH MAIN STREET, HARTFORD, VERMONT

Photograph 1: Soil boring B-1 in the gravel parking area, on the north central side. South Main Street is off-picture on the right.

Photograph 2: Soil boring B-2 in the gravel parking area at the northeast side of the building. The office space is immediately behind the door and the window.

Photograph 3: Looking south along the east side of the building. Soil boring B-3 location is visible just beyond the bollard. Soil borings B-4, B-5, and B-6 continue to the loading dock area.

Photograph 4: The outbuilding with door has a fuel oil AST within. Soil boring B-8 is visible as the red dot between the door and the propane tanks.

Photograph 5: Typical soil boring from B-2 through the gravel parking lot. The upper tube is 0 to 4 feet with mixed gravels, rubble, and fill. The center tube is 4 to 8 feet and the lower tube is 8 to 12 feet, mostly native fine sand.

Photograph 6: Soil boring B-6, the only boring with soil staining noted in the upper tube at approximately 16 to 24 inches below grade. The other material at the left of the tube is bituminous concrete surface layer.

Eastern Analytical, Inc.

p ·wnis rofessional laboratory & dn \

er\lices

Russell Rohloff

Pathways Consulting, LLC

240 Mechanic Street, Suite 100

Lebanon , NH 03766

Subject: Laboratory Report

Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID: 133277

Dear Mr. Rohloff:

Client Identification: College Cleaners

Date Received: 7/7/2014

Enclosed please find the laboratory report for the above identified project. All analyses were performed in accordance with our QA/QC Program. Unless otherwise stated, holding times, preservation techniques, container types, and sample conditions adhered to EPA Protocol. Samples which were collected by Eastern Analytical, Inc. (EAi) were collected in accordance with approved EPA procedures. Eastern Analytical, Inc. certifies that the enclosed test results meet all requirements of NELAP and other applicable state certifications. Please refer to our website at www.eailabs.com for a copy of our NELAP certificate and accredited parameters.

The following standard abbreviations and conventions apply to all EAi reports: Solid samples are reported on a dry weight basis, unless otherwise noted < : "less than" followed by the reporting limit > : "greater than" followed by the reporting limit %R : % Recovery

Eastern Analytical Inc. maintains certification in the following states: Connecticut (PH-0492), Maine (NHOOS), Massachusetts (M-NHOOS), New Hampshire/NELAP (1012), Rhode Island (269) and Vermont (VT1012).

The following information is contained within this report: Sample Conditions summary, Analytical Results/Data, Quality Control data (if requested) and copies of the Chain of Custody. This report may not be reproduced except in full, without the the written approval of the laboratory.

If you have any questions regarding the results contained within, please feel free to directly contact me or the chemist(s) who performed the testing in question. Unless otherwise requested, we will dispose of the sample(s) 30 days from the sample receipt date.

We appreciate this opportunity to be of service and look forward to your continued patronage.

Sincerely,

Lorraine Olashaw, Lab Director Date #of pages (excluding cover letter)

25 Chenell Drive I Concord, NH 0330 I I 800.287.0525 I www.eailabs.com

SAMPLE CONDITIONS PAGE

Client: Pathways Consulting, LLC

Client Designation: College Cleaners

EAi ID#: 133277

Temperature upon receipt (°C): 10 Received on ice or cold packs (Yes/No): y Acceptable temperature range (°C): 0-6

Date Date Sample % Dry Lab ID Sample ID Received Sampled Matrix Weight Exceptions/Comments (other than thermal preservation)

133277.01 B-6 7/7/14 7/7/14 soil 83.0 AdherestoSampleAcceptancePolicy

133277.02 B-5 7/7/14 7/7/14 soil 81.9 Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy



133277.05 Trip Blank 7/7/14 7/7/14 soil 100.0 Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy

Samples were properly preserved and the pH measured when applicable unless otherwise noted. Analysis of solids for pH, Flashpoint, lgnitibility, Paint Filter, Corrosivity, Conductivity and Specific Gravity are reported on an "as received" basis. Immediate analyses, pH, Total Residual Chlorine, Dissolved Oxygen and Sulfite, performed at the laboratory were run outside of the recommended 15 minute hold time.

All results contained in this report relate only to the above listed samples.

References include: 1) EPA 60014-79-020, 1983 2) Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edition, 1998 and 22nd Edition, 2012 3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste SW 846 3rd Edition including updates /VA and /VB 4) Hach Water Analysis Handbook, 2nd edition, 1992

Eastern Analytical, Inc. www.eailabs.com 1800.287.0525 I [email protected] 1

LABORATORY REPORT



Sample ID: B-6

Lab Sample ID: 133277.01

Matrix:

Date Sampled: Date Received:

Units:

Date of Analysis:

Analyst: Method:

Dilution Factor:

Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane Diethyl Ether Acetone 1, 1-Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Carbon disulfide Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1, 1-Dichloroethane 2,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2-Butanone(MEK) Bromochloromethane Tetrahydrofuran(THF) Chloroform 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane Carbon tetrachloride 1, 1-Dichloropropene Benzene 1,2-Dichloroethane Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Dibromomethane Bromodichloromethane 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Toluene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane 2-Hexanone Tetrachloroethene 1,3-Dichloropropane Dibromochloromethane 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) Chlorobenzene 1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene a-Xylene Styrene Bromoform lsoPropylbenzene

soil

7/7/14 7/7/14

mg/kg

7/11/14

BML

8260B

< 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

< 0.05 <2

< 0.05 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

< 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.1 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

B-5

133277.02

soil

717114 7/7/14

mg/kg

7/11/14

BML

8260B

< 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

< 0.05 <2

< 0.05 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

< 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.1 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

B-4

133277.03

soil

717114 7/7/14

mg/kg

7/11/14

BML

8260B

1

< 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

< 0.05 <2

<0.05 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

< 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.5 <0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.1 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

B-3

133277.04

soil

7/7/14 7/7/14

mg/kg

7/11/14

BML

82608

1

< 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

< 0.05 <2

< 0.05 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

< 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.1 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Trip Blank

133277.05

soil

7/7/14 7/7/14

mg/kg

7/11/14

BML

82608

< 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

< 0.05 <2

< 0.05 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

< 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.5 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

< 0.1 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

EAi ID#: 133277


mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

mikes

Highlight

LABORATORY REPORT

EAi ID#: 133277 Client: Pathways Consulting, LLC


Sample ID: 8-6 8-5 8-4 8-3 Trip Blank

Lab Sample ID: 133277.01 133277.02 133277.03 133277.04 133277.05

Matrix: soil soil soil soil soil

Date Sampled: 7/7/14 7/7/14 717/14 717/14 717/14 Date Received: 7/7/14 717/14 717/14 717/14 717/14

Units: mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

Date of Analysis: 7/11/14 7/11/14 7/11/14 7/11/14 7/11/14

Analyst: BML BML BML BML BML

Method: 82608 82608 82608 82608 82608

Dilution Factor: 1 1 1 1

Bromobenzene <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 n-Propylbenzene <0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 2-Chlorotoluene < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4-Chlorotoluene <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 tert-Butylbenzene < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 sec-Butylbenzene < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 p-lsopropyltoluene <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 n-Butylbenzene < 0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 Naphthalene < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr) 91 %R 91 %R 91 %R 90%R 90%R 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 (surr) 100 %R 101 %R 100%R 101 %R 100 %R Toluene-dB (surr) 96%R 96%R 95%R 96%R 95%R

Eastern Analytical, Inc. www.eailabs.com I 800.287.0525 I [email protected] 3

LABO RA TORY REPORT



Sample ID: B-6


Matrix: soil

Date Sampled: 7/7/14 Date Received: 7/7/14

Units: mg/kg

Date of Analysis: 7/9/14

Analyst: VG

Method: 8015Cmod

Dilution Factor: 1

TPH (Gasoline Range C6-C12) <4 FID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr) 89%R

B-5

133277.02

soil

7/7/14 7/7/14

mg/kg

7/9/14

VG

8015Cmod

1

<3 89%R

B-4 B-3 Trip Blank

133277.03 133277.04 133277.05

soil soil soil

7/7/14 7/7/14 7/7/14 7/7/14 7/7/14 7/7/14

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

7/9/14 7/9/14 7/9/14

VG VG VG 8015Cmod 8015Cmod 8015Cmod

1 1 1

<3 <3 <3 93%R 87%R 73 %R

EAi ID#: 133277

Eastern Analytical, Inc. www.eailabs.com I 800.287.0525 I [email protected] 4

LABORATORY REPORT



Sample ID: B-6


Matrix: soil

Date Sampled: 7/7/14 Date Received: 7/7/14

Units: mg/kg

Date of Extraction/Prep: 7/8/14

Date of Analysis: 7/8/14

Analyst: SH

Method: 8015CDRO

Dilution Factor:

DRO (Diesel Range C1 O-C28) <8 p-Terphenyl-014 (TPH surr) 58%R

B-5 B-4 B-3

133277.02 133277.03 133277.04

soil soil soil

7/7/14 7/7/14 7/7/14 7/7/14 7/7/14 7n/14

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

7/8/14 7/8/14 7/8/14

7/8/14 7/8/14 7/8/14

SH SH SH

8015CDRO 8015CDRO 8015CDRO

1

<8 <8 <8 68%R 67%R 73%R

EAi ID#: 133277


CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Page ___ of __ _

Bow f1ELDs REQUIRED. PLEASE C&RCLE REQUESTED ANALYSIS .

SAMPLING DATE/TIME

*IF COMPOSITE,

INDICATE BOTH >< ;: START & FINISH SAMPLE f.D. !;(

DATE/TIME

MATRIX: A-AIR; S-SOIL; GW-GROUND WATER; SW-SURFACE WATER; DW-DRINIONG WATER; WW-WASTE WATER

PRESERVATIVE: H-HCL; N-HNOi; S-H2SO ; Na-NaOH; M-MEOH

ADDRESS: ~JlikJiC t31R.-eer- ...,;9Utr.e I

~· ~ = ..... "" '""!~ Ci ::-

CITY: STATE: /IJJ/ ZIP: t!J.f!/7'6 PHONE: .A/1-1_5.t .;?...";ICO EXT.: ___ _

FAX: ~ :3 44~ /.;J.;2./ E-MAIL: /<,IJ -s-s .. Ro#~Ai? m~~t;@lf Sm NAME: Cb t..t-e..rae Clt-o4~"

x x

QA/QC REPORTING LEVEL

A B C

OR

PRESUMPTIVE CERTAINTY

..,. "' "" = "-..... ..,. "' "' ~

<.::>

"" =! 0

~ ~ "' iii "' I ~ ::E! = _cS ~ t::; o=

~:c 2- ~a

~ ~ = '""' §

t::; "" "' 0 =~ iO'l Q ~ o= ~ :::; "" 0

~ dt5 g ~

=0 ......... Q ==

REPORTING OPTIONS

PRELIMS: YES OR No

IF YES:. FAX OR PDf

ELECTRONIC OPTIONS

No FAX E-MAIL PDF

'--' 0

d 0

~ :a '--' 0 g:_ ~ .....

!-' !-' 9 a i Q

~ ei = :z "-!-'

Q :z Q 0 ""' '§.. 8 = .....

ICE? c:ffi) No

EQUIS

~ "' ~ = z c "' ~

133277

~ >- ~ ~58

""'"' i=3 u..i z

~.!: ~ = = NOTES z B~ i "' jj '--' !z

~~ 8 i= MEOH VIAL # ~~ ~~

:;; ~~ 'ti: ~=

2 2..

METALS: 8 RCRA 13 PP FE, MN PB, CU

OTHER METALS:----------

SAMPLES FIELD FILTERED? D YEs D No

NOTES: (IE: SPECIAL DETECTION LIMITS, BILLING INFO, IF DIFFERENT)

PROJECT#:---------------.---------\ STATE: '1\TH" MA ME ® OTHER: evl/tte:: ;ft!IBC_ reri l~~A~~~fl-~l--4{_/__/'-L~5f:!.ll'!E.~~~::=::;;;~~;F' REGULATORY PROGRAM: NPDES: RGP POTW STORMWATER OR

GWP, OIL FUND, BROWNFIELD OR OTHER: ________ _ SITE HISTORY: __________ _

QUOTE #: ________ _ PO#: _______ _ SUSPECTED CONTAMINATION: _______ _

RELINQUISHED BY: DATE: TIME: RECEIVED BY: FIELD READINGS; _________ _

25 CHENELL DR1vE I CoNcoRo. NH 03301 I TEL: 603.220.0525 I 1.000.287.0525 I FAx: 603.228.4591 I E-MA1L: [email protected] I www.EAILABs.coM

(WHITE: ORIGINAL GREEN: PROJECT MANAGER)

ATHWAYS ONSULTING - Vermont

Documents

Transcript of ATHWAYS ONSULTING - Vermont