assfc:x&iim^MiLWikfemmvmids.data.jma.go.jp/mscweb/technotes/msctechrep17-4.pdf ·...
Transcript of assfc:x&iim^MiLWikfemmvmids.data.jma.go.jp/mscweb/technotes/msctechrep17-4.pdf ·...
%MmmM>$- wmm.% %\m i988#n/i
assfc: x&iim^MiLWikfemmvmi
Investigation into position accuracy of typhoon center
determined on GMS imagery
Takashi Ichinari
Abstract
MSC reports the information on the typhoon obtained from GMS imagery in the code of
SAREP (WMO internationalcode FM-85VI) since 1stJune 1984. In SAREP, positionof typhoon
center (hereafter GMS-center) and its accuracy which is determined from 10 cloud patterns of
typhoon are included.
The diameters of the area where typhoon centers possibly exist were newly obtained for a
term of a year (1987, T8702-T8723). The diameters were verifiedby the difference between
GMS-centers and best tracks (determined by JMA) and were in approximate agreement with the
position accuracy reported in SAREP. Besides the diameter can represent position accuracy
more properly than the current determination.
%Mmm.^y?~ (msc) Tno^mmmmm<Di
ifc^^gll (Image Display:WTIDP11 6 )H B
fesfect^^So s&tzmz, a^sig^csarep
%&Jt (JMA) -CftJgUfeii^JtKL, fuSJI^cfS
i. m^tt&T-ftmm
uttzizi mmmo msc ^ ≪ ^ -5^^tt sr -*
1301M k 6 ^fH Kft ?>tifc JMA c r - ^ 543#J *
Meteorological SatelliteCenter
i.i mM<D%m
msc mfem: msc tmmmmfr s>m%vtz-&m
H (besttrack)o
Wft^iftM "・Mscm^fit jma ^^fic^
^'C^J^ffiS : SAREPm~CMM$nt^5 *M
^^^ffi^lS : MSC izisiff6 tphmfeftMR^
f^H-cti, idp ±-cs^citg t#x e>
i. 2 sarep R?m u ?≫^'^mfemm
SAREP$gT"te. ^'Ci^BC^J^filS* Table-lc
i5f35i*TViSo 3SftN MSC Tti^jjg (1984) cid
-31-
250
METEORLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE Nal7 NOVEMBER 1988
(Table-2)&ffr*U ^n^Lti^-y*^*
'Cd^fUS (At)***, SAREP≪T≪i;T^So
ft) SAREPIg-Tfi, IS^At-C^^1-o
Table―1 Determination accuracy of
tropical cyclone center in SAREP
A t -*MIH£≫ffic+<&ffiKcW5£*fft
Code
0 4"&tta*Hfflc 1 0 k m£Jfi
1 ≪frMia≪ttBc 2 0k mjg/lrt
2 +'&≪≪≪&■c 5 0km≪rt
3 +&≫*≫*&■c 1 0 0 k mJslrt
4 +<M*aiWftBc 2 0 0k mJ^rt
5 +<M*a*{ftBc3 0 0 kmjart
/ 8H£-e#tt≪f'≫
£**£c# 3-F (1~4) SflC^I-o 0*c'*'W
a, #3-KK*riiS-r**'C,^^iR^c^s$(iE)i)
#3-Kc*^≫Jt≫Stt,
3- F 1 (Fig. 1 - 1) Ttt, *^^^MM20km^
rtfc, 52^|+50#!l (96%) *5^#ltUSo
n - F 2 (Fig. 1 - 2 ) Tfi, 4>ii>ft3£KM5Okm£<
rtC, 238^1*234^1 (98%) A^^LTV^O
z
a
150
100
50
0
*
Fig.1-1
Table-2 Correspondencebetween SAREP
code and cloudpattern
A t -a&$fi*ffic+<fcffiBc\!lJ£≪l*
Cloud Pattern Code
1. Distinct small eye 1
2. Distinct large eye 2
3. Ragged eye 2
4. Banding eye 2
5. Distinct spiral band 2
6. Distinct CDO 2
7. Indistinct CDO 3
8. Shear 3
9. Organized cb-cluster 3
10. Unorganized cb-cluster 4
n - K 3 (Fig. 1 - 3 ) T≪. +'fr8tf£≫glOOkniJa
WK, 237#|+228#| (96%) tffrftLX^Zo
3-K4 (Fig. 1 - 4 ) T≪, *^ftSE≫S200kmUt
rttc, 16^1^15^ (94%) i^ltt^o
ZV&iftftL-C^iZbbfrfrZo tot, S^°^
100 150 200DISTANCE(KM)
Distribution of the difference between JMA' s and
MSC s center location for SAREP 'code 1'
-32-
o
o
o
150
100
50
150
100
so
0
150
100
50
SUfcffiM-tz>*- mm& *17^ 1988#ll£
50・100
DISTANCE(KM)
150 200
Fie. 1-2 Same as in Fig. 1-1 except for SAREP 'code2'
50 100 150 200JL. DISTANCE IKM)
Fie. 1-3 Same as in Fie. 1-1 except for SAREP lcode3'
50 100
OISTANCE(KM)
150 200
Fig. 1-4 Same as in Fig. 1-1 except for SAREP lcode4'
-33-
250
250
-250
250100 200
DISTANCE[KM)
150
Fig.2―1 Distribution of the difference between
JMA's and MSC's center location for All
Dattern
50
100 15C 200DISTANCE(KM)
Same as in Fig.2-1 except for Shear pattern
50
Fig.2-3
250
Fig.2―2 Same as in Fig.2-1 except for Distincteye pattern
-34-
METEORLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE Nq17 NOVEMBER ,1988
2. w>&xmmo)mt
i$jM,<DM^7->t>K Table-2C^1-l0ac£fc'**
0fflbi&\<>'*f―><Dfflh LT, ^ti^nDistinct
eye patternt Shear patterncM^^^o
2.1 All pattern
£Tc/N°?-y££ff-f 3 t, 543#j-C$>&o Fig.
it, ±fctLXm<D'b$^1ifcfrWM*l>, 50km
Wft (a- F 2 K^tJS) K482^J (89%), 201^^^ (3
-K lMttfcO C360^!l(66%) *^*t, HKM#*J
-3kLtzM (MO) fc1320H (24%) &-itzo
2.2 Distinct eye pattern
Z.0)'*■?*-Wi, distinct small eye t distinct
large eye £Mf-Ltz fcQTUmh^ tzo Fig. 2-2
^ (97%) *S20kmmrtC^*-r*o
QZ
z
o
100
50
100
50
2.3 Shear pattern
m*mtitz-R.mfchz>hv-enmh^tzo Fig.2-3
£^3 J:,MtiO~2lOkmi:J!A|gHC^*1-5o ititi
a^*s^:§ <*lLtv>4o 50kmWrtK57M (78%)
*^*t> 20kmi^F(g^fe40^J(56%) *^*-fSo
5
I
SUfc*M-&>*- tttRtf* IB17-S- 1988*11/!
3. 4>'b#&tn* t *>k*&mm t <mm
3.1 All Pattern
Fig. 3 - 1 KjfLtzfy'b&lEffim t $>&9k%.&M
§ *5/Jn$ <, *bVk%mB&*. § < 4 o T fcJSP*f#fi
^^MM50kmJ^±-C 3 Offi|^l*5^Bf K & S o200km&rt
(3-F4C*HS) c*J≫TH*^-5≪≪K543^4'
541#!l(99%JU±) *^*-T*o
250
200
w
GO
150
100
50
3.2 Distincteye pattern
Z(D^7~y\$, 3-K 1 t 2iZi>tzio Fig.3 -
2 £^-5 fc, 63^^"Cj653- K 2 C^t)^f 550kmR^
≫-rffl**l4≪≪rtK^^U F^52f!|(81%) *J20km
3.3 Shear pattern
Z.(D^9-y\%, 3-K 3 CJbfcio Fig. 3- 3c
#&£≪** S ≪―£ K * o "Cv14 c *s^*≫ 40
a - F
3 C^)S1--SlOOkm0^:^c^^rtK73F!l4]67^J (92
%) *s^*t. 1EIC47WI (64%) **5Okm0*iftcffl#
fleets.
■TSlHl-c3-F0ffiJ≪rtC9O%J^±*^^L, t^
fc, ±SB≪fcDISKl7>'^/jN$^3-F0^i*rtKfe
" 0
o
a Qo Oa
Z ALL PATTERN
| ( PATTERN 1-10 )
TOTAL = 543
sarep cnnF =.<
A
O
SAREP CODE = 3
SAREP CODE = 2
iu
1 & "
SAREP CODE = 1
^ h£ ?SV"SAREP CODE = 0
a? **
0 50 100 iSO 200 250DISTANCE(KM)
Fig.3―1 Comparison between area size of possible geographical position and the
difference distance between JMA's and MSC's center location for All pattern
-35-
METEORLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE Nal7 NOVEMBER 1988
250
200
150
1
55
wNto
100
50
250
200
150
100
50
" 0
o
o
ZD
Oo
T>
g DISTINCT EYE
jj>( PATTERN i - 2 )
^ TOTAL = S3
5AREP CDDP = <
"0
o
Qs
SAREP CODF = 3
SAREP CODE = 2
_A
SAREP CODE = 1
r* KA
SAREP CODE = 0
p^*sr
0 50 100 150 200 250
DISTANCEIKH!
Fie.3―2 Same as in Fig.3-1 except for Distinct eye pattern
- o
Oo
3 )
g SHEAR
° ( PATTERN 8 )
^ TOTAL = 73
sarfp rnnF = 4
/
>・
O
SAREP CODE = 3
&
&
SAREP CODE = 2
1 A
a!y *
SAREP CODE ≪ 1
≪z2 ≫
SAREP CODE = Q
* A
c so00 150 200 25
DISTANCEIKM)
Fig.3―3 Same as in Fig.3-1 except for Shear pattern
-36-
*UfeffiS-fe>*- ffllffl£ IB17-?- 1988 ^ 11 ^
4. w*<p->m<r>*>b&&im<≫5t*i
4.1 Distinctsmall eye
:o^-yii, HB**!JBMf(S≫JER) T/Jn^v^
c*V≫-5o Fig.4-lK.ZtUf^ 4≫'fr#£≪≪20km&
rtK 115^*113011 (98%) A^fttSo *&#£≪#
4.2 Distinctlarge eye
Z<D'S7->IZ, B8c££*M:§vi;fci&% Distinct
smalleye Cit^'L^^^i***;*^ < 4otv>S,
Fig.4 - 2 JCfcfU*. 24^!l^:TA54I^#ft^^50km^
4.3 Ragged eye
O*vhs, 24209* ofco Fig. 4-3 Eititf, 4>'0#
£≪≪5Olon&rtK:2410g (99%i^±) *^^Jt, 20fanJ^
rtCfcl71fif!l(71%) *5^*f-So \i&ttl7.5km-T*
4.4 Banding eye
'<?->? Jb.ZoFig.A-iViXtHi* 72M^:T*^
£^£≪#50km&WK:##U 390B (54%) *520kmJ^
4.5 Distinct spiralband
y K# 4≫'kti"iSKl^tSaiA^^feOT21909*S, Fig.
4 - 5 K i *U£, Banding eye ^Jrb^ff^^ > F c# §
5/7 h L"CVi*o+^#ffi≪≪50kmiJtrtK:213WI(97%)
*^*t. 20km^rtCfe64ffil (30%) &&*&?& o \
i^ti27.5km-C*-So
4.6 Distinct CDO
^cg^ (Central Dense Overcast) TWbfitz h c
TBSttftVi,, Fig. 4-6Einil 270B^TiJ+'iJ#
-37-
ft£#40]anJartK:$Mlrr*o \±^≪19.9km-r*l>0
4.7 Indistinct CDO
i^*;;B§l$&/No?~-y£vH\ 216f!|*5o Fig. 4-7
Cifur, DistinctCDO CJt^lSlggBK^^I--So *
'L≫#ft≪≪50kmi^rtK:i88fif!l(86%) *^^"t*o \^
{i34.01ant**)*≪
4.8 Shear
19409a*;:c^-ycA-So Fig. 4-8 ckfUiT,
< tt5Okm&rt"C1580!l (81%) **#*&■*■*, JEC 20km
JUrtCfc370!l (19%) *5^^JL, ic≪^:^Jf*5Tl
*>M±37.lkm-?#>£,
4.9 Organized cb-cluster
+.'frtt3aEJ£0^&B!l& cb-cluster(Dh-ifih 9 , ft
*, 4M>#£^UiM≪C*§ < ^r^^rv^ Fig. 4 -
9££■&fc% 128-em(82%) *J50kmJ^I^K^*f So \
±Ste40.1km-C£5,,
4.10 Unorganized cb-cluster
^'C^ifiC^O^aBiJ* cb-cluster<Dfri*$> V, B
mikOZL^^f-yZ^Oo Fig. 4-10C≪tS fc.
360J i:^*i6:*5 6 +'i>#ffi≪≪ttit≪!≪JK≪HC^*
*'Crf|E£^≪50kinJJtrt≫cttl4ffi|(39%) O^^IIt^o
METEORLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE Nal7 NOVEMBER, 1988
FREQUENCY
to
30
20
10
I
0
+
I
I
I
I
I PATTERN 1 : DISTINCT SMALL EYE1 TOTAL COUNT ≫ 115
SIZE AVERAGECRADIUS) * 10.284203
STANDERD DIVIATION ・ 13.716765
10 20 50 100
.....E
SIZEC RADIUS : KM )
Fig.4―1 Distribution of area size of possible geographical position for 'DISTINCT SMALL EYE'
FREQUENCY
40
10
0 10
I PATTERN 2 : DISTINCT LARGE EYE
TOTAL COUNT ≫ 24SIZE AVERAGE(RADIUS) * 22.120850STANDERD DIVIATION m 32.123367
so
-38-
I
I
I
I
a,,,.....,,,.,.,,,.=,,ax*,:.≫...................E
100 SIZEC RADIUS : KM >20
Fig.4-2 Same as in Fig.4-1except for 'DISTINCT LARGE EYE'
L
FREQUENCY
40
20
10
FREQUENCY
40
20
10
+
+
≪ I
mfe≫M-te>*- WJlfflfe IS 17* 1988 if 11 J!
I
I
I
I
1 PATTERN 3 : RAGGED EYE
10
< I
≫ I * ≪
> I < >
< ≪ I ≫ ≪
20
+
10 20
I
< I
≪ I
< I
≫ ≪ ・ I
so
1
I
I
I
TOTAL COUNT - 242SIZE AVERAGE(RAOIUS) = 17.482712STANOERO DIVIATION ≫ 24.565857
1 PATTERN 4 : BANDING EYEI
I
I
50
-39-
SIZEC RADIUS : KM
SI2EC RADIUS : KM )
100
Fie.4-3 Same as in Fig.4-1 except for 'RAGGED EYE'
TOTAL COUNT = 72SIZE AVERAGE(RADIUS) = 19.587616STANDERD DIVIATION = 26.023788
100
Fig.4-4 Same as in Fig.4-1except for 'BANDING EYE'
-40-
METEORLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE Nal7 NOVEMBER. 1988
FREQUENCY
FREQUENCY
40
30
20
10
010
> I
> * I
≪ ・ ≫ I
≫ ≪ ・ I ≪
≪ ≪ ・ I ・
50
I
50
+
100
≫............≪....≪≪..≫≫......£
SIZEC RADIUS : KM )
I
100 S1ZEC RADIUS : KM )
Fig.4-5 Same as in Fig.4-1except for'DISTINCT SPIRAL BAND'
PATTERN 6 : DISTINCT CDOTOTAL COUNT ≫ 27SIZE AVERAGE(RADIUS) = 19.856384
STANOERO DIVIATION = 26.778915
< I
≫ I
20
Fig.4-6 Same as in Fig.4-1 except for DISTINCT CDO'
FREQUENCY
40
10
FREQUENCY
40
30
20
10
10
≪ < I
10
I
I
20
sufc≪m-tz>*- mm% mv* lms-un
PATTERN 7 : INDISTINCT CDOTOTAL COUNT - '216SIZE AVERAGE(RADIUS) ■ 34.066040STANDERD DIVIATION ≫ 44.842682
so
+
50
-41-
I
I
I
I
...........................E
SI2E( RADIUS : KH )
* *
100
Fiir.4-7 Same as in Fie.4-1 except for INDISTINCT CDO'
PATTERN 8 : SHEARTOTAL COUNT ≫ 194SIZE AVERAGE(RADIUS) ≫ 37.1O2S85STANDERD DIVIATION ≪ 56.261795
100 SIZEC RADIUS : KM
Fig.4-8 Same as in Fig.4-1 except for SHEAR'
20
METEORLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE Nal7 NOVEMBER, 1988
FREQUENCY
40
30
20
10
10
FREQUENCY
40
I
I
I
I
20
0 10
Fig 4
PATTERN 9 : ORGANIZED CB-CLUSTERTOTAL COUNT ≪ 156SIZE AVERAGE(RADIUS) = 40.096893STANDERD DIVIATION * 54.527786
50
so
-42-
I
I
100
+
SIZEC RADIUS : KM )
100 SIZEC RADIUS : KM >
≪ ≪ ≪ I
≪≪≪≪≪≪ I
20
Fie.4-9 Same as in Fig.4-1 except for ORGANIZED CB-CLUSTER'
PATTERN 10 : UNORGANIZED CB-CLUSTERTOTAL COUNT ≫ 36SIZE AVERAGE(RAOIUS) = 56.181061
'.
STANDERO DIVIATION ' 65.842560
10 Same as in Fie.4-1 except for UNORGANIZED CB-CLUSTER'
≫**≪>*- &mR£ *17* 1988#ll£
4.ii *bffl?&mR<Dmti£m
Table- 3 fc&htotzo&'S?->fcltlt&<Dtzib. 41
Table―3 Frequency distributionof area size of possible geographical positionfor the cloud patterns
^^\ (km)CLOUDPATTBRN~-\^^
0-10 10-20 20-50 50-100100-200 AVERAGE(km) TOTAL
1. DISTINCT SMALLm
****£≪* CODE 1
57
50* 5 648%
I1 0. 3 1 1 5
2. DISTINCT LARGE EYE+£>≪)£≫* CODE 2 A 33X
1 2
50≪2 2. 1 2 4
3. RAGGED EYEWPJ56*** CODE 2
4 5 1 2 6
525S7029X ox 1 7. 5 2 4 2
4. BANDING EYE
4"MlJ;t≪* CODE 29
12X30
3346* 1 9. 6 7 2
5. SPIRAL BANDtf*w;e≪# code 2 k 60
11% 1 4 968X & 'ox 27. 5 2 1 9
6. DISTINCT CDO*<M9]/£≪* CODE 2
415X
^
tf2 0. 0 2 7
7. INDISTINCT CDO4"MUft≫* CODE 3 2|
3 1
14X Vol &f3 4. 0 2 1 6
8. SHEAR+'£>≪£*** CODE 3
4 33
17XlM M k 37. 1 1 9 4
9. ORGANIZEDCB-CIUSTBR
*/M*e≫S CODE 3
y sy M IX
4 0. 1
1 5 6
10. UNORGANIZED
CB-CLUSTER4*≪:£≪r≪ CODE 4
1 439%
2261X
5 6. 2 3 6
TOTAL 1 32 3 6 5 6 8 3 1 1 3 7 2 8. 4 130 1
Jlfo SAREP m-cmCX V>6 ^C#!l£ffiSfcJ\&E
d0≪fc-5*MfcbT. Sfe i < M6tiS0≪ Shear /*
Shear ^°^- Vc≪^, iA7->Ci5 *'L4'J^
fSJtti ^ - F 3 X\Z.tiltS A RE Pm<DfflfcVitr*>b
Fig. 5KT≫Sti≪t5^l≫i&SJft!&fcO^a (Shear
pattern)cW^^t0 i^SISfc, THSKiSS
-43-
ffi(Fig.2-3. Fig.4-8) Cfc^K/t^So
Fig. 5 An example of SHEAR pattern with
distinctlow cloud vortex (GMS visibleimage
at 03 TJTC on 30 SEP 1987)
METEORLOGICAL SATELLITE CENTER TECHNICAL NOTE Nq17 NOVEMBER 1988
ZZX, gfc£>TShear s*? ―>73ffl£XiZ.-o^X*
^18M (24%) *D, Ztlt>±Xtf*<\j&femM25\sm
JJtrt(3-K0-1, -SB2C*fjS) C*^t^
A^fco fi!^t, B^Sg^TlS^^feo Shear^°^-
Z>Z.ttfX%Z>o
iac*c!|^SK≪i:s≪iaf0jtvifc*m-rsifcA≫T§
6. tttb
d fc*JH X.i>o
1. *'(>#≪≪≪t4≫'L"lt^S^tt. #^^->c
m s*
£c≪&££*:≪>*£*>*:!). ≫#ff£c$H^±ll
##£S*
UeilR±> 1984: GMS iz.X £^JlcfuSR# t * 0
mma^r, nmffiM,*>?~-&mm^ no.io,
15-18.
-44-