ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2015 1

The ASAS-SN Bright Supernova Catalog – II. 2015

T. W.-S. Holoien1,2,3?, J. S. Brown1, K. Z. Stanek1,2, C. S. Kochanek1,2,B. J. Shappee4,5, J. L. Prieto6,7, Subo Dong8, J. Brimacombe9, D. W. Bishop10,U. Basu1,11, J. F. Beacom1,2,12, D. Bersier13, Ping Chen8, A. B. Danilet12,E. Falco14, D. Godoy-Rivera1, N. Goss1, G. Pojmanski15, G. V. Simonian1,

D. M. Skowron15, Todd A. Thompson1,2, P. R. Wozniak16, C. G. Avila17,G. Bock18, J.-L. G. Carballo19, E. Conseil20, C. Contreras17, I. Cruz21,J. M. F. Andujar22, Zhen Guo8,23, E. Y. Hsiao24, S. Kiyota25, R. A. Koff26,G. Krannich27, B. F. Madore4, P. Marples28, G. Masi29, N. Morrell17,L. A. G. Monard30, J. C. Munoz-Mateos31, B. Nicholls32, J. Nicolas33,R. M. Wagner1,34, and W. S. Wiethoff35

1 Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA2 Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics (CCAPP), The Ohio State University, 191 W. Woodruff Ave.,

Columbus, OH 43210, USA3 US Department of Energy Computational Science Graduate Fellow4 Carnegie Observatories, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA5 Hubble and Carnegie-Princeton Fellow6 Nucleo de Astronomıa de la Facultad de Ingenierıa, Universidad Diego Portales, Av. Ejercito 441, Santiago, Chile7 Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Santiago, Chile8 Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Yi He Yuan Road 5, Hai Dian District,

Beijing 100871, China9 Coral Towers Observatory, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia10 Rochester Academy of Science, 1194 West Avenue, Hilton, NY, 14468, USA11 Grove City High School, 4665 Hoover Road, Grove City, OH 43123, USA12 Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, 191 W. Woodruff Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA13 Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK14 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA15 Warsaw University Astronomical Observatory, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland16 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop B244, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA17 Las Campanas Observatory, Carnegie Observatories, Casilla 601, La Serena, Chile18 Runaway Bay Observatory, 1 Lee Road, Runaway Bay, Queensland 4216, Australia19 Observatorio Cerro del Viento, MPC I84, Pl. Fernandez Pirfano 3-5A, 06010 Badajoz, Spain20 Association Francaise des Observateurs d’Etoiles Variables (AFOEV), Observatoire de Strasbourg, 11 Rue de l’Universite,

67000 Strasbourg, France21 Cruz Observatory, 1971 Haverton Drive, Reynoldsburg, OH, 43068, USA22 Observatory Inmaculada del Molino, Hernando de Esturmio 46, Osuna, 41640 Sevilla, Spain23 Department of Astronomy, Peking University, Yi He Yuan Road 5, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100871, China24 Department of Physics, Florida State University, 77 Chieftain Way, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA25 Variable Star Observers League in Japan, 7-1 Kitahatsutomi, Kamagaya, Chiba 273-0126, Japan26 Antelope Hills Observatory, 980 Antelope Drive West, Bennett, CO, 80102, USA27 Roof Observatory Kaufering, Lessingstr. 16, D-86916 Kaufering, Germany28 Leyburn & Loganholme Observatories, 45 Kiewa Drive, Loganholme, Queensland 4129, Australia29 Virtual Telescope Project, Via Madonna de Loco, 47-03023 Ceccano (FR), Italy30 Kleinkaroo Observatory, Calitzdorp, St. Helena 1B, P.O. Box 281, 6660 Calitzdorp, Western Cape, South Africa31 European Southern Observatory, Casilla 19001, Santiago, Chile32 Mount Vernon Observatory, 6 Mount Vernon Place, Nelson, New Zealand33 Groupe SNAude France, 364 Chemin de Notre Dame, 06220 Vallauris, France34 LBT Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0065 USA35 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, 230 Heller Hall, 1114 Kirby Drive,

Duluth, MN. 55812, USA

10 February 2017

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)

arX

iv:1

610.

0306

1v2

[as

tro-

ph.H

E]

9 F

eb 2

017

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000) Preprint 10 February 2017 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0

ABSTRACTThis manuscript presents information for all supernovae discovered by the All-SkyAutomated Survey for SuperNovae (ASAS-SN) during 2015, its second full year of op-erations. The same information is presented for bright (mV 6 17), spectroscopicallyconfirmed supernovae discovered by other sources in 2015. As with the first ASAS-SNbright supernova catalog, we also present redshifts and near-UV through IR magni-tudes for all supernova host galaxies in both samples. Combined with our previouscatalog, this work comprises a complete catalog of 455 supernovae from multiple pro-fessional and amateur sources, allowing for population studies that were previouslyimpossible. This is the second of a series of yearly papers on bright supernovae andtheir hosts from the ASAS-SN team.

Key words: supernovae, general — catalogues — surveys

1 INTRODUCTION

In recent decades, systematic searches for supernovae haveprogressed into the era of large projects that survey some orall of the sky for supernovae and other transient phenomenausing varying degrees of automation. These projects includethe Lick Observatory Supernova Search (LOSS; Li et al.2000), the Panoramic Survey Telescope & Rapid ResponseSystem (Pan-STARRRS; Chambers et al. 2016), the TexasSupernova Search (Quimby 2006), the Sloan Digital Sky Sur-vey (SDSS) Supernova Survey (Frieman et al. 2008), theCatalina Real-Time Transient Survey (CRTS; Drake et al.2009), the CHilean Automatic Supernova sEarch (CHASE;Pignata et al. 2009), the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF;Law et al. 2009), the Gaia transient survey (Hodgkin et al.2013), the La Silla-QUEST (LSQ) Low Redshift SupernovaSurvey (Baltay et al. 2013), the Mobile Astronomical Systemof TElescope Robots (MASTER; Gorbovskoy et al. 2013)survey, the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment-IV(OGLE-IV; Wyrzykowski et al. 2014), and, recently, the As-teroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS; Tonry2011), among numerous others.

Prior to 2013, however, there was no rapid-cadence op-tical survey that surveyed the entire visible night sky tofind the bright, nearby supernovae that can be studied mostcomprehensively, and thus have the largest impact on ourunderstanding of supernova physics. This changed with thecreation of the All-Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae(ASAS-SN1; Shappee et al. 2014), a long-term project de-signed to find bright transients, such as nearby supernovae(e.g., Dong et al. 2016; Holoien et al. 2016b; Shappee et al.2016), tidal disruption events (Holoien et al. 2014a; Brownet al. 2016b,a; Holoien et al. 2016d,c), flares in active galacticnuclei (Shappee et al. 2014), stellar outbursts (Holoien et al.2014b; Schmidt et al. 2014; Herczeg et al. 2016; Schmidtet al. 2016), and cataclysmic variable stars (Kato et al.2014a,b, 2015, 2016).

ASAS-SN accomplishes this using 8 telescopes with 14-cm aperture lenses and standard V -band filters which havea 4.5 × 4.5 degree field-of-view and a limiting magnitudeof mV ∼ 17 (see Shappee et al. (2014) for further techni-cal details). The ASAS-SN telescopes are divided into twounits, each consisting of four telescopes on a common mount

? tholoien@astronomy.ohio-state.edu1 http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~assassin/

hosted by the Las Cumbres Observatory Global TelescopeNetwork (LCOGT; Brown et al. 2013). Our northern unit,Brutus, is hosted at the LCOGT site on Mount Haleakalain Hawaii, while our southern unit, Cassius, is hosted at theLCOGT site at Cerro Tololo, Chile. These two units give usroughly 20000 square degrees of coverage per clear night,and we cover the entire observable sky (∼ 30000 squaredegrees on a given night) with a 2 − 3 day cadence. Alldata are processed and automatically searched in real-time,which allows for rapid discovery and response, and discover-ies are announced publicly, sometimes within a few hours ofdata collection. For a more detailed history of the ASAS-SNproject, see the introduction of Holoien et al. (2016a).

Though some professional surveys have more numerousdiscoveries, all transients discovered by ASAS-SN are brightand relatively nearby, which allows them to be observed overwide wavelength ranges and long time baselines using fairlymodest resources. Spectra of ASAS-SN discoveries are ofteneasily obtainable with a 1-m telescope, and all ASAS-SNsupernovae have been spectroscopically confirmed and clas-sified. ASAS-SN also uses an untargeted survey approach,which allows us to provide a less biased tool than other sur-veys for studying the populations of nearby supernovae andtheir host galaxies.

This manuscript is the second of a series of yearly cat-alogs provided by the ASAS-SN team and presents the col-lected information on supernovae discovered by ASAS-SN in2015 and their host galaxies. As was done in our 2013 and2014 catalog (Holoien et al. 2016a), we provide the sameinformation for bright supernovae, defined as those withmpeak 6 17, discovered by other professional surveys andamateur astronomers in 2015 in order to construct a fullsample of bright supernovae discovered in 2015. The anal-yses and information presented here supersedes our discov-ery and classification Astronomer’s Telegrams (ATels), all ofwhich are cited in this manuscript, and the information pub-licly available on the ASAS-SN web pages. We also exam-ine simple statistical properties of the combined supernovaesample from this manuscript and from Holoien et al. (2016a).Throughout our analyses, we assume a standard ΛCDM cos-mology with H0 = 69.3 km s−1 Mpc−1, ΩM = 0.29, andΩΛ = 0.71 for converting host redshifts into distances.

In §2 we detail the sources of the information presentedin this manuscript. In §3, we give statistics on the supernovaeand hosts in the full, cumulative sample, provide analyses ofthe data, and discuss the overall trends seen in the sample.

c© 0000 The Authors

ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2015 3

Finally, in §4, we conclude with remarks about the overallfindings and look at how future ASAS-SN catalogs will bean integral tool in nearby supernova rate calculations thatwill be done by the ASAS-SN team.

2 DATA SAMPLES

Here we describe the sources of the data collected for oursupernova and host galaxy samples, which are presented inTables 1, 2, 3, and 4.

2.1 The ASAS-SN Supernova Sample

The ASAS-SN supernova sample is listed in Table 1 andincludes all supernovae discovered by ASAS-SN between2015 January 1 and 2015 December 31. As in Holoienet al. (2016a), we collected the names, discovery dates, hostnames, and host offsets for ASAS-SN discoveries from ourdiscovery Astronomer’s Telegrams (ATels), which are citedin Table 1. IAU names are also listed for those supernovaethat had one assigned. As we note in our ATels, we view theASAS-SN names as having priority due to the failure of theIAU system to provide proper credit to the discovery team.We use the IAU system only to avoid temporal reportingconflicts, and encourage others to refer to our discoveries bytheir ASAS-SN designations.

Redshifts have been spectroscopically measured fromclassification spectra in all cases. For cases where a redshifthad been previously measured for a supernova host galaxyand is consistent with the transient redshift, we list the red-shift of the host obtained from the NASA/IPAC Extragalac-tic Database (NED)2. For cases where the measurements arenot consistent or where a host redshift was not available, wetypically report the redshifts given in the classification tele-grams.

Supernova classifications are taken from classificationtelegrams, which we have also cited in Table 1. For thosesupernovae that had best-fit ages reported in their classi-fications, we also give the approximate ages at discovery,measured in days relative to peak. Supernovae were typi-cally classified using either the Supernova Identification code(SNID; Blondin & Tonry 2007) or the Generic ClassificationTool (GELATO3; Harutyunyan et al. 2008), both of whichcompare the observed input spectra to template spectra inorder to estimate the best supernova type and age match.

Two supernovae, ASASSN-15da and ASASSN-15hx,never had a redshift announced publicly, and we report red-shift measurements here. Using the classification spectrumtaken with the Ohio State Multi-Object Spectrograph (OS-MOS; Martini et al. 2011) mounted on the MDM Obser-vatory Hiltner 2.4-m telescope we measured a redshift of0.048 ± 0.003 for ASASSN-15da using SNID. We measureda redshift of 0.0081 for ASASSN-15hx using the host-galaxyHα line detected in a nebular spectrum obtained on 2016March 11 with the Inamori Magellan Areal Camera andSpectrograph (IMACS; Dressler et al. 2011) mounted on the

2 https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/3 gelato.tng.iac.es

Magellan-Baade 6.5-m telescope at Las Campanas Observa-tory.

Based on checking archival classification and late-timespectra of the 2015 ASAS-SN supernova discoveries, wealso update a number of redshifts and classifications fromthe values reported in the discovery and classificationtelegrams. ASASSN-15al, ASASSN-15az, ASASSN-15bm,ASASSN-15bo, ASASSN-15jm, ASASSN-15lo, ASASSN-15mg, ASASSN-15mx, ASASSN-15nx, ASASSN-15ou,ASASSN-15rg, ASASSN-15sh, ASASSN-15um, ASASSN-15uo, ASASSN-15up, and ASASSN-15ug have updatedredshifts that have been remeasured from supernova orhost spectra obtained with OSMOS on the MDM 2.4-mtelescope, IMACS on the Magellan-Baade 6.5-m telescope,the FAst Spectrograph for the Tillinghast Telescope (FAST;Fabricant et al. 1998), and the Wide Field Reimaging CCDCamera (WFCCD) mounted on the 2.5-m du Pont telescopeat Las Campanas Observatory. Based on a re-examinationof the classification spectra, we have updated the classi-fications of ASASSN-15fa, ASASSN-15fr, ASASSN-15fs,ASASSN-15ga, ASASSN-15hy, ASASSN-15jm, ASASSN-15kg, ASASSN-15kj, ASASSN-15mi, ASASSN-15og,ASASSN-15ou, ASASSN-15tg, ASASSN-15um, ASASSN-15uo, ASASSN-15us, and ASASSN-15ut. We also reportan updated redshift for ASASSN-15ed from Pastorelloet al. (2015) and an updated redshift and classification ofASASSN-15no from Benetti et al. (in preparation). Theseredshifts and classifications are reported in Table 1.

For all ASAS-SN supernovae we solved the astrometryin follow-up images using astrometry.net (Barron et al. 2008)and measured a centroid position for the supernova usingIRAF, which typically yielded errors of <1.′′0 in position.This is significantly more accurate than measuring the co-ordinates directly from ASAS-SN images, which have a 7.′′0pixel scale. Follow-up images used to measure astrometrywere obtained using the LCOGT 1-m telescopes at McDon-ald Observatory, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory,Siding Springs Observatory, and the South African Astro-nomical Observatory (Brown et al. 2013); OSMOS mountedon the MDM Hiltner 2.4-m telescope; the Las CampanasObservatory Swope 1-m telescope; IMACS mounted on theMagellan-Baade 6.5-m telescope; or from amateur collabo-rators working with the ASAS-SN team. In most cases, wereported coordinates measured from follow-up images in ourdiscovery telegrams, but we report new, more accurate coor-dinates in Table 1 for supernovae that were announced withcoordinates measured from ASAS-SN data.

We have re-measured V -band, host-subtracted discov-ery and peak magnitudes from ASAS-SN data for all ASAS-SN supernova discoveries, and report these magnitudes inTable 1. In some cases, re-reductions of the ASAS-SN datahave resulted in differences between the magnitudes given inTable 1 and those in the original discovery ATels. Here, the“discovery magnitude” is defined as the magnitude on theannounced discovery date. We also performed a parabolicfit to the measured magnitudes for cases with enough de-tections, and we use the brighter value between the peak ofthe fit and the brightest measured magnitude as the “peakmagnitude” reported in Table 1. For cases with too few de-tections for a parabolic fit, we use the brightest measuredmagnitude as the peak magnitude.

One supernova, ASASSN-15kn, was announced by

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)

4 T. W.-S. Holoien et al.

ASAS-SN in an ATel and was later announced by theItalian Supernovae Search Project4 in a the Central Bu-reau for Astronomical Telegram (CBAT) with the namePSNJ12415045-0710122. The ISSP discovery image was ob-tained prior to the ASAS-SN discovery image, but since weannounced it first, we list it as an ASAS-SN discovery withits ASAS-SN name in Table 1.

All supernovae discovered by ASAS-SN in 2015 are in-cluded in this catalog, including those that were fainter thanmV = 17, but in the comparison analyses presented in §3we exclude those supernovae with mV,peak > 17 so that oursample matches the non-ASAS-SN sample.

2.2 The Non-ASAS-SN Supernova Sample

Table 2 gives information for the sample of bright super-novae that were not discovered by ASAS-SN. This sample in-cludes all spectroscopically confirmed supernovae with peakmagnitudes mpeak 6 17 discovered between 2015 January 1and 2015 December 31.

Data for these non-ASAS-SN discoveries were compiledfrom the “latest supernovae” website5 maintained by D. W.Bishop (Gal-Yam et al. 2013). This page provides a reposi-tory of discoveries reported from different channels and at-tempts to link objects reported by different sources at differ-ent times, and thus provides the best available source in 2015for collecting information on supernovae discovered by dif-ferent sources. The names, IAU names, discovery dates, co-ordinates, host names, host offsets, peak magnitudes, types,and discovery sources that are listed in Table 2 were takenfrom this page when possible. Redshifts for host galaxieswere retrieved from NED when available, and were takenfrom the latest supernovae website when previous host mea-surements were not available. For cases where the websitedid not list a host name or host offset for the supernova,this information was taken from NED. We define the offsetin these cases as the difference between the reported super-nova coordinates and the galaxy coordinates in NED. For allsupernovae in both samples, we give the primary name ofthe host galaxy from NED, which sometimes differs from thename listed on the ASAS-SN supernova page or the latestsupernovae website.

We list the name of the discovery group for all super-novae discovered by other professional surveys. For super-novae discovered by non-professional astronomers, we lista discovery source of “Amateurs” in order to distinguishthese supernovae from those discovered by ASAS-SN andother professional surveys. As was the case in 2014, ama-teurs accounted for the largest number of bright supernovadiscoveries after ASAS-SN in 2015.

Lastly, we note in Table 2 whether these supernovaewere independently recovered while scanning ASAS-SN dataso that we can quantify the impact ASAS-SN would have onthe discovery of bright supernovae without the presence ofother supernova searches. In §3.2, we examine the cases ofthe two very bright (mpeak < 15) supernovae from 2015 thatwere not recovered by ASAS-SN in order to determine why

4 http://italiansupernovae.org/5 http://www.rochesterastronomy.org/snimages/

ASAS-SN missed these supernovae despite its large coveragearea and high cadence.

2.3 The Host Galaxy Samples

We have collected Galactic extinction values and magni-tudes in various photometric filters spanning from the near-ultraviolet (NUV) to the infrared (IR) for all host galax-ies of the supernovae in both the ASAS-SN and the non-ASAS-SN samples. These data are presented in Tables 3and 4 for ASAS-SN hosts and non-ASAS-SN hosts, respec-tively. The Galactic AV is taken from Schlafly & Finkbeiner(2011) and was gathered from NED for the supernova posi-tion. We obtained NUV magnitudes from the Galaxy Evo-lution Explorer (GALEX) All Sky Imaging Survey (AIS),optical ugriz magnitudes from the Sloan Digital Sky Sur-vey Data Release 12 (SDSS DR12; Alam et al. 2015), IRJHKS magnitudes from the Two-Micron All Sky Survey(2MASS; Skrutskie et al. 2006), and W1 and W2 magni-tudes from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE;Wright et al. 2010) AllWISE source catalog. For cases wherethe host is not detected in 2MASS data, we adopt an upperlimit which corresponds to the faintest detected host magni-tude in our sample (mJ > 16.5, mH > 15.7) for the J- andH-bands.

For the KS-band, we estimate a host magnitude forthose hosts that are not detected in 2MASS but are de-tected in the WISE W1-band by adding the mean Ks−W1offset from the sample to the WISE W1 data. We calcu-lated this offset by averaging the offsets for all hosts thatwere detected in both the KS- and W1-bands from both su-pernova samples, and it is equal to −0.64 magnitudes witha scatter of 0.05 magnitudes and a standard error of 0.002magnitudes. This agrees well with the offset calculated withthe 2014 sample in Holoien et al. (2016a). For hosts that arenot detected in either 2MASS or WISE, we again adopt anupper limit corresponding to the faintest detected host inthat filter, mKS > 15.6.

3 ANALYSIS

Here we provide some basic statistical analyses of the super-nova samples and examine reasons why ASAS-SN does notrecover some very bright supernovae.

3.1 Sample Analyses

Combining all the bright supernovae from both samples dis-covered between 2014 May 1, when ASAS-SN became op-erational in both hemispheres, and 2015 December 31 pro-vides a total sample of 425 supernovae, after excluding thoseASAS-SN discoveries with mpeak > 17.0. Of these, 57%(242) were discovered by ASAS-SN, 25% (105) were discov-ered by amateurs, and 18% (78) were discovered by otherprofessional surveys. By type, 278 were Type Ia supernovae,115 were Type II supernovae, and 31 were Type Ib/Ic su-pernovae. Following Li et al. (2011), we include Type IIbsupernovae in the Type II sample to allow a more direct com-parison with their results. ASASSN-15lh is either a Type Isuperluminous supernova (SLSN-I; Dong et al. 2016; Godoy-Rivera et al. 2016) or a tidal disruption event around a Kerr

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)

ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2015 5

Ia76% (183)

II

21% (50)

Ib/Ic3% (8)

ASAS-SN Discoveries (241)

Ia

52% (95)

II

36% (65)

Ib/Ic13% (23)

Non-ASAS-SN Discoveries (183)

Ia

66% (278)

II

27% (115)

Ib/Ic7% (31)

Full Sample (424)

Figure 1. Left Panel : Pie chart breaking down the ASAS-SN sample of supernovae discovered between 2014 May 01 and 2015 December31 by type. The fractional breakdown is quite similar to that of an ideal magnitude-limited sample from Li et al. (2011). Center Panel :

The same breakdown of supernova types for the Non-ASAS-SN sample from the same time period. Right Panel: The same breakdown

of supernova types for the combined sample. Type IIb supernovae are considered part of the “Type II” sample for this analysis.

black hole (Leloudas et al. 2016), and we do not include itin analyses that look at trends by type. ASAS-SN discov-ered 66% (183) of the Type Ia supernovae, 43% (50) of theType II supernovae, and 26% (8) of the Type Ib/Ic super-novae. Amateurs discovered 20% (55), 31% (36), and 48%(15) of the Type Ia, Type II, and Type Ib/Ic supernovae,respectively, while other professional surveys accounted forthe remaining 15% (41), 25% (29), and 26% (8) of each.

In Figure 1 we show a breakdown by type of the su-pernovae in the ASAS-SN sample, the non-ASAS-SN sam-ple, and the combined sample. As would be expected from amagnitude-limited sample, Type Ia supernovae represent thelargest fraction of supernovae in all three samples (e.g., Liet al. 2011). The ASAS-SN sample has the highest fractionof Type Ia supernovae of the three samples, and matches the“ideal magnitude-limited sample” breakdown (79% Type Ia,17% Type II, and 4% Type Ib/Ic) predicted from the LOSSvolume-limited sample in Li et al. (2011) almost exactly. Aswas the case with just the 2014 sample, the non-ASAS-SNsample and the overall sample have higher fractions of TypeII and Type Ib/Ic supernovae (Holoien et al. 2016a).

Although ASAS-SN discovers fewer supernovae over-all than other professional surveys, ASAS-SN has been thedominant source of bright supernova discoveries since be-coming operational in both hemispheres in May of 2014.Trends seen in the 2014 sample (Holoien et al. 2016a) con-tinue in the 2015 sample as well. ASAS-SN often discoverssupernovae shortly after explosion due to its rapid cadence:217 of the ASAS-SN supernovae have approximate measuredages at discovery, and 70% (151) were discovered prior toreaching their peak brightness.

ASAS-SN also continues to be less affected by hostgalaxy selection effects than other bright supernova searches:24% (57) of the ASAS-SN bright supernovae were discov-ered in catalogued host galaxies without known redshifts,while only 14% (26) of the supernovae discovered by othersources were found in such hosts. An additional 3% (7) ofthe ASAS-SN supernovae were found in uncatalogued hostsor have no apparent host galaxy compared to 1% (2) of the

non-ASAS-SN discoveries, indicating that ASAS-SN is lessbiased against finding supernovae in uncatalogued hosts.

ASAS-SN discoveries continue to stand out from brightsupernovae discovered by other sources with regards to theiroffsets from their host galaxy nuclei. In Figure 2 we showthe host KS-band absolute magnitude and the offset fromhost nucleus for all supernovae in our sample, with the me-dian values for each source (ASAS-SN, amateurs, or otherprofessionals) marked with horizontal and vertical lines. Tohelp put the overall magnitude scale in perspective, a typ-ical L? galaxy has M?,KS = −24.2 (Kochanek et al. 2001),and a corresponding luminosity scale is given on the upperaxis of the Figure.

Amateur surveys are significantly biased towards lu-minous galaxies and larger offsets from the host nucleus,which is unsurprising given that they tend to observe bright,nearby galaxies and use less sophisticated detection tech-niques than professional surveys. This approach allows am-ateur observers to obtain many observations of such galaxiesper night, increasing their chances of finding supernovae, butit biases them against finding supernovae in fainter hosts.Other professional surveys in our comparison sample do dis-cover supernovae with smaller angular separations than am-ateurs (median value of 12.′′2 vs. 15.′′0), but in terms of phys-ical separation both samples exhibit a similar median offset(4.9 kpc for professionals, 5.1 kpc for amateurs). Conversely,ASAS-SN discoveries have median offsets of 4.′′9 and 2.6 kpc,indicating that ASAS-SN is less biased against discoveriesclose to the host nucleus than either comparison group. Thethree other professional groups with the most discoveriesin our comparison sample are CRTS (Drake et al. 2009),MASTER (Gorbovskoy et al. 2013), and LOSS (Li et al.2000), which either do not use difference imaging or ig-nore central regions of galaxies in their searches, and thislikely contributes to their larger offsets. As we pointed outin Holoien et al. (2016a), however, ASAS-SN continues tofind a higher rate of tidal disruption events than other sur-veys (see Holoien et al. 2016d,c), including those that do usedifference imaging, which implies that the avoidance of the

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)

6 T. W.-S. Holoien et al.

Figure 2. Upper Panel : Absolute KS-band host galaxy magnitude versus the offset from host nucleus in arcseconds for our total brightsupernova sample. The upper axis gives the log (L/L?) values corresponding to the magnitude scale for M?,KS

= −24.2 (Kochanek et al.

2001). Supernovae discovered by ASAS-SN are shown as red stars, those discovered by amateur observers are shown as black circles,

and those discovered by other professional surveys are shown as blue squares. Filled points indicate supernovae that were independentlyrecovered by ASAS-SN. Triangles are used to indicate upper limits on host galaxy magnitudes for hosts that were not detected by either

2MASS or WISE. Median offsets and magnitudes for ASAS-SN, Amateurs, and other professionals are indicated by dashed, dotted,

and dash-dotted lines, respectively, in colors matching the data points. Upper limits are included in computing the median magnitudes.Lower Panel : As above, but with the offset measured in kiloparsecs rather than arcseconds.

central regions of galaxies is still fairly common in surveysother than CRTS, MASTER, and LOSS.

The median host magnitudes for supernovae discov-ered by ASAS-SN, other professionals, and amateurs areMKS ' −22.7, MKS ' −22.6, and MKS ' −23.9, respec-tively. While the median host magnitude for other profes-sionals’ discoveries is slightly fainter than that for ASAS-SN discoveries, the measurements are consistent given the

uncertainties. There is however a clear distinction betweenprofessional surveys (including ASAS-SN) and amateurs.

ASAS-SN has had a significant impact on the discov-ery of bright supernovae. One way this can be seen is bylooking at the number of bright supernovae discovered permonth in 2013, 2014, and 2015. Figure 3 shows a histogramof supernovae with mpeak 6 17 discovered by ASAS-SN andthose discovered by other sources in each month of 2013,2014, and 2015. As was the case in Holoien et al. (2016a),

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)

ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2015 7

2013

Jan.

Feb.

Mar

.A

pr.

May

Jun.

Jul.

Aug

.Se

p.O

ct.

Nov

.D

ec.

2014

Jan.

Feb.

Mar

.A

pr.

May

Jun.

Jul.

Aug

.Se

p.O

ct.

Nov

.D

ec.

2105

Jan.

Feb.

Mar

.A

pr.

May

Jun.

Jul.

Aug

.Se

p.O

ct.

Nov

.D

ec.

Month

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

NSN

Real-timeAnalysisBegins

Brutus UpgradedCassius Deployed

Machine LearningImplemented

Cassius Upgraded

ASAS-SN DiscoveriesRecoveredNot Recovered

Figure 3. Histogram of bright supernovae discoveries in each month of 2013, 2014, and 2015. ASAS-SN discoveries are indicated in red,

supernovae discovered by other sources and independently recovered by ASAS-SN are indicated in green, and supernovae that were not

recovered by ASAS-SN are indicated in blue. Significant milestones in the ASAS-SN timeline are also indicated. The impact of ASAS-SNbecoming operational in both hemispheres in 2014 May is clearly seen by a large increase in discoveries in all following months. ASAS-SN

accounts for at least half of the bright supernova discoveries in every month after 2014 April, and also recovers a significant fraction of

the supernovae it does not discover, particularly in 2015.

we include information for all bright supernovae discoveredin the early months of 2014 for completeness, and we addthe same information for all of 2013 as well to expand ourcomparison. To help show the impact of various improve-ments to the ASAS-SN hardware and software, we indicatecertain milestones, such as the deployment of our southernunit Cassius and its upgrade to 4 telescopes, on the figureas well.

Before our southern unit Cassius became operational,other supernova searches were discovering the majority ofbright, nearby supernovae. However, as can be seen in Fig-ure 3, the addition of Cassius and improvements to ourpipeline had a major impact on our detection efficiency. Forevery month of 2014 and 2015 after the deployment of Cas-sius, ASAS-SN discovers or independently recovers at leasthalf of all bright supernovae, and often this fraction is sig-nificantly larger. The average number of bright supernovaediscovered per month has also increased substantially sinceASAS-SN became operational in both hemispheres, from 14with a scatter of 4 supernovae per month to 21 with a scat-ter of 5 supernovae per month. This implies that the rate ofbright supernovae discovered per month has increased from∼ 13 ± 2 supernovae per month prior to Cassius becomingoperational to ∼ 21 ± 2 supernovae per month afterwards,providing roughly 4σ evidence that the discovery rate hasincreased since Cassius was deployed. This suggests thatASAS-SN is discovering supernovae that would not other-wise be discovered by other supernova searches, and thusthat we can now construct a more complete sample of bright,nearby supernovae.

ASAS-SN is also less biased in terms of the locations of

its discoveries. Figure 4 shows a cumulative normalized his-togram of supernovae with respect to the sine of their dec-lination. The green dashed line represents what would beexpected if supernovae were discovered at all declinationsequally. As can be seen in the figure, supernovae discov-ered by non-ASAS-SN sources have a clear bias towards thenorthern hemisphere: the non-ASAS-SN histogram falls sig-nificantly below the “no bias” expectation except at very low(sin (Dec) . −0.8) and very high (sin (Dec) & 0.6) declina-tions. This is not unexpected, as many professional searchesare based in the northern hemisphere. The ASAS-SN dis-coveries make the combined sample (the black line) followthe expected distribution very closely. The primary bias re-maining in sky coverage is the Galactic plane.

The redshift distribution of our full sample, dividedby supernova type, is shown in Figure 5. There is a cleardistinction between the redshifts of Type Ia and Type IIsupernovae in our sample, with the Type II distributionpeaking at z . 0.01 and the Type Ia distribution peak-ing closer to z ∼ 0.03. This distribution is not unexpectedfor a magnitude-limited sample, as Type Ia supernovae aretypically more luminous than core-collapse supernovae. Aswas the case in our 2014 sample (see Holoien et al. 2016a),the Type Ib/Ic distribution peaks between z = 0.015 andz = 0.02. This trend is not as clear, due in part to the com-paratively small number of Type Ib/Ic supernovae in thesample.

Finally, Figure 6 shows a cumulative histogram of su-pernova peak magnitudes with 13.5 < mpeak < 17.0. ASAS-SN discoveries, ASAS-SN discoveries and recovered super-novae, and all supernovae from our sample are shown in

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)

8 T. W.-S. Holoien et al.

-1 -0.75 -0.5 -0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

sin(Dec)

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1N

SN

OtherASAS-SNAll

Figure 4. Cumulative normalized histogram of supernova dis-

coveries with respect to the sine of their declination. ASAS-SNdiscoveries are shown in red, non-ASAS-SN discoveries are shown

in blue, and the combined sample is shown in black. The green

dashed line represents what would be expected if supernovae wereequally likely to be discovered at all declinations. Non-ASAS-SN

discoveries have a clear northern bias and fall well below the ex-

pectation except near the poles, while ASAS-SN discoveries cor-rect this trend.

red, blue, and black, respectively. As was the case in thelast 8 months of 2014, amateur observers account for a largenumber of very bright discoveries (those with mpeak . 14.5;Holoien et al. 2016a). However, in 2015, ASAS-SN discov-ered a fairly significant fraction of these very bright super-novae as well, showing that it can be competitive with am-ateurs who observe the relatively small number of very low-redshift galaxies with high cadence. ASAS-SN discovers orrecovers every supernova with mpeak < 14, and accounts fora large fraction of the supernovae overall. We discuss thenon-recovered cases with mpeak < 15 in §3.2. At m ∼ 16.5the distribution flattens, as such supernovae spend less timeat magnitudes bright enough to be found by ASAS-SN.

A full discussion of supernova rates is being deferredto an upcoming manuscript (Holoien et al., in prep.), butFigure 6 illustrates the magnitude completeness of our sam-ple. We fit a broken power-law in magnitude (shown with agreen dashed line) to the unbinned magnitudes of the theo-retically observable SN brighter than m = 17.0 assuming aEuclidean slope below the break magnitude and a variableslope for fainter sources, deriving the parameters and theiruncertainties using Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC)methods. For the SN discovered by ASAS-SN, the num-ber counts are consistent with a Euclidean slope down to16.30 ± 0.08 mag, which is about 0.3 mag fainter than wefound for the 2013/2014 sample and another indication ofimprovements in our survey and pipelines. For the samplesadding SN later found by ASAS-SN or the sample of allbright SN, we find similar break magnitudes of 16.26± 0.07and 16.27± 0.07 mag, respectively.

The integral completenesses of the three samples rela-tive to the Euclidean predictions are 0.95±0.03 (0.64±0.04),0.93±0.03 (0.60±0.03), and 0.94±0.03 (0.64±0.03) at 16.5(17.0) mag, respectively. The differential completenesses ofthe three samples relative to the Euclidean predictions are0.62 ± 0.09 (0.19 ± 0.05), 0.54 ± 0.06 (0.15 ± 0.03) and0.60 ± 0.07 (0.20 ± 0.04) at 16.5 (17.0) mag, respectively.

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11

Redshift

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

NSN

Type IaType IIType Ib/Ic

Figure 5. Histograms of the supernova redshifts with a bin width

of z = 0.005. The red, blue, and green lines show the Type Ia,

Type II, and Type Ib/Ic redshift distributions, respectively. Sub-types (e.g., SN 1991T-like Type Ia supernovae) are included as

part of their parent groups. Type Ia supernovae in our sample arepredominantly found at higher redshifts, while the Type II su-

pernovae are found at comparatively lower redshifts, as expected

from a magnitude-limited sample.

These results vary little between the three sample defini-tions and a rough characterization is that 2/3 of the SNbrighter than 17 mag are being found, but only one in 5-6 of the 17 mag SN are being found (relative to the Eu-clidean extrapolation from the brighter < 16 mag SN). TheEuclidean approximation modestly underestimates the truecompleteness for the faint SN because of deviations from aEuclidean geometry, the effects of time dilation on rates, andK-corrections. We will include these higher order correctionswhen we carry out a full analysis of the rates.

3.2 Examination of Missed Cases

In Holoien et al. (2016a) we performed a retrospective ex-amination of all bright supernovae that were not discoveredor recovered by ASAS-SN in a single month (2014 August)in order to better understand some of the reasons ASAS-SNwould not recover supernovae that should be bright enoughto be detected. Our conclusion was that many of the missedcases in 2014 would be recovered by ASAS-SN today, dueto factors such as better cadence, Galactic plane coverage,and an improved detection pipeline.

This is born out in the observations. From 2014 May1 through 2014 December 31, ASAS-SN recovered 24%(19/80) of the supernovae discovered by other sources. In2015, this fraction increased dramatically, to 55% (57/104),indicating that our recovery rate has indeed improved since2014. Of the 47 supernovae that were not recovered, roughlyhalf (23) had peak magnitudes of mpeak > 16.5, which makesthem more likely to be missed in our data due to factors suchas peaking between ASAS-SN observations or occurring dur-ing the full moon, when our survey depth is reduced. While itis clear that there is still room for improvement, ASAS-SN isnow recovering more than half of the supernovae discoveredby other supernova searches, and we expect this fraction tocontinue to increase in the future.

A similar analysis of missed cases to the one performedin Holoien et al. (2016a) is unlikely to reveal additional use-

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)

ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2015 9

13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16 16.5 17

Peak Magnitude

1

10

100

1000N

SN

AllASAS-SN Discovered + RecoveredASAS-SN Discovered

Figure 6. Cumulative histogram of supernovae with respect to

peak magnitude, using a 0.1 magnitude bin width. The black lineshows the distribution for all supernovae in our sample, while the

red line shows only those supernovae discovered by ASAS-SN,

and the blue line includes both ASAS-SN discoveries and thosesupernovae that were independently recovered in ASAS-SN data.

The green dashed line shows a broken power-law fit normalized

to the complete sample assuming a Euclidean slope below thebreak magnitude and a variable slope for fainter sources, while the

lavender dashed line indicates an extrapolation of the Euclideanslope to fainter magnitudes. The fits indicate that the sample is

roughly 2/3 complete for mpeak < 17.

ful information regarding the reasons that ASAS-SN doesnot recover bright supernovae in our data. We expect thatthe majority of missed cases in 2015 would have been missedfor similar reasons to those discussed in the 2014 catalog.Instead, here we focus on the very bright (mpeak 6 15.0)supernovae from 2015. These are supernovae that should bedetectable in ASAS-SN data regardless of observing con-ditions, and are also the most interesting supernovae forfollow-up study due to their brightness. Understanding thereasons why we missed such supernovae is important to en-sure that we miss as few of them as possible going forward.Of the supernovae discovered by other professional searchesand amateurs in 2015, 13 had mpeak 6 15.0. Of these 13,only 2 (SN 2015I and MASTER OT J141023.42-431843.7)were not independently recovered in ASAS-SN data. We ex-amine these two cases in detail here.

SN 2015I was discovered in NGC 2357 on 2015 May02 by amateur astronomers (CBET 4106), and peaked at amagnitude of 14.0. Unfortunately, the field containing thissupernova was not observable due to Sun constraints fromeither of our telescope sites for a significant portion of 2015:we were unable to observe the field between 2015 April 22and 2015 August 29. While the host galaxy had not quiteset for the season at the time of discovery, our northern unitBrutus is constrained in how far west it is able to observedue to the presence of the LCOGT 2-m telescope in the sameenclosure. Since the supernova was discovered at the begin-ning of this timeframe, it had faded beyond our detectionlimit by the time we were able to observe it. While it is un-fortunate that we were not able to observe this supernova,there is little that could be done to allow us to discover orrecover cases like these.

MASTER OT J141023.42-431843.7 was discovered inNGC 5483 on 2015 December 15 by MASTER (Gorbovskoyet al. 2013), and peaked at a magnitude of 14.4. This su-

pernova occurred in an observing field that was transferredto one of the new Cassius cameras in the summer of 2015,when we upgraded our Cassius unit to 4 telescopes. Beforeperforming image subtraction in a field, we first construct areference image by co-adding numerous high-quality expo-sures. Because of weather and technical issues at the startof operations with four cameras, almost no images were ob-tained in good conditions prior to the field setting in 2015September. When the field was again observable in 2016January, the supernova was present, but we did not haveenough high-quality images to build a proper reference im-age. As a result, new images (containing the supernova)would have been rapidly incorporated into the reference im-age, preventing detection. The supernova faded below ourdetection limits on 2016 January 16. Essentially, this was acase of bad timing, as the supernova occurred in a field thatwas not ready for searching at the time it was observable.The field now has a very good reference image built fromimages spread over the last year, and the supernova is triv-ially found in multiple epochs if we analyze the data from2016 January using the current reference image.

While we never want to miss any of the brightest super-novae, neither of these cases was observable by ASAS-SN,and the number of very bright supernovae we have missedhas decreased over time: in the latter 8 months of 2014 wemissed 4 supernovae with mpeak 6 15.0. This indicates thatwe have improved our efficiency with very bright supernovaeto the point where we are now highly unlikely to miss themin the future if they are observable by ASAS-SN.

4 CONCLUSION

This manuscript provides the second comprehensive catalogof spectroscopically confirmed bright supernovae and theirhosts created by the ASAS-SN team. We now have collectedinformation on two and a half years of ASAS-SN discov-eries and 20 months of discoveries from other professionalsurveys and amateurs. The full combined sample comprises454 supernovae, 271 of which were discovered by ASAS-SN.We also include an analysis of trends with supernova type,location, peak magnitude, sky position, and redshift, as wellas with host galaxy luminosity and supernova offsets fromhost nuclei. The analyses suggest that the sample closelyresembles that of an ideal magnitude-limited survey as de-scribed by Li et al. (2011), but with a smaller-than-expectedproportion of Type Ia supernovae relative to core-collapsesupernovae.

ASAS-SN remains the only professional survey attempt-ing to provide a complete, all-sky, rapid-cadence survey ofthe nearby universe, and as such it has had a significantimpact on the discovery and follow-up of bright supernovaein its first 2.5 years of operation. Even today ASAS-SN op-erates in a region of parameter space that is largely moni-tored by amateur astronomers, who focus on bright, nearbygalaxies for their supernova searches, and it operates withfewer biases. The analysis presented in this paper indicatesthat ASAS-SN is finding supernovae that otherwise wouldnot be discovered (e.g., Figure 3), that it eliminates muchof the northern hemisphere bias in supernova discoveries(Figure 4), and that it systematically discovers supernovaecloser to galactic nuclei than both amateurs and other pro-

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)

10 T. W.-S. Holoien et al.

fessionals and in significantly less luminous galaxies thanamateurs (Figure 2). Compared to our performance in 2014(Holoien et al. 2016a), we independently recovered a signif-icantly higher fraction of non-ASAS-SN discoveries in 2015,and we recovered all very bright (mpeak 6 15.0) supernovaethat were observable by our telescopes in 2015.

The completeness of our full sample has also improvedsince the end of 2014. In Figure 6 we show that the mag-nitude distribution of the bright supernovae discovered be-tween 2014 May 1 and 2015 December 31 is roughly com-plete to a peak magnitude of mpeak = 16.3, and is roughly66% complete for mpeak 6 17.0. While we still must ad-dress the absolute normalization of the expected number ofsupernovae (by accounting for factors such as sky coverageand time windows) in order to determine nearby supernovaerates, this analysis serves as a precursor to rate calculationswhich will be presented in future work by the ASAS-SNteam (Holoien et al., in prep.). As noted in Holoien et al.(2016a), such nearby rate calculations have the potential toimpact a number of fields, including the nearby core-collapserate (e.g., Horiuchi et al. 2011, 2013) and multi-messengerstudies ranging from gravitational waves (e.g., Ando et al.2013; Nakamura et al. 2016), to MeV gamma rays from TypeIa supernovae (e.g., Horiuchi & Beacom 2010; Diehl et al.2014; Churazov et al. 2015) to GeV–TeV gamma rays andneutrinos from rare types of core-collapse supernovae (e.g.,Ando & Beacom 2005; Murase et al. 2011; Abbasi et al.2012). These joint measurements would greatly increase thescientific reach of ASAS-SN discoveries.

This is the second of a yearly series of bright supernovacatalogs provided by the ASAS-SN team. It is our hope thatby collecting and publishing these data on supernovae andtheir hosts that we will create convenient and useful repos-itories that can be used for new and interesting populationstudies. These catalogs also provide a tool for other profes-sional supernova surveys to perform similar analyses of theirdata pipelines as we have done for ASAS-SN. While ASAS-SN may discover fewer supernovae than other professionalsurveys because it is limited to only bright supernovae, itdoes find the best and the brightest, and these catalogs areone way in which we can fully leverage the unbiased ASAS-SN sample to impact the field of supernova science now andin the future.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank LCOGT and its staff for their continuedsupport of ASAS-SN.

ASAS-SN is supported by NSF grant AST-1515927. De-velopment of ASAS-SN has been supported by NSF grantAST-0908816, the Center for Cosmology and AstroParticlePhysics at the Ohio State University, the Mt. Cuba Astro-nomical Foundation, and by George Skestos.

TW-SH is supported by the DOE ComputationalScience Graduate Fellowship, grant number DE-FG02-97ER25308. JSB, KZS, and CSK are supported byNSF grant AST-1515927. KZS and CSK are also sup-ported by NSF grant AST-1515876. BJS is supported byNASA through Hubble Fellowship grant HST-HF-51348.001awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, whichis operated by the Association of Universities for Research

in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract NAS 5-26555. Support for JLP is in part provided by FONDECYTthrough the grant 1151445 and by the Ministry of Econ-omy, Development, and Tourism’s Millennium Science Ini-tiative through grant IC120009, awarded to The MillenniumInstitute of Astrophysics, MAS. SD is supported by “theStrategic Priority Research Program-The Emergence of Cos-mological Structures” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(Grant No. XDB09000000) and Project 11573003 supportedby NSFC. JFB is supported by NSF grant PHY-1404311.PRW acknowledges support from the US Department ofEnergy as part of the Laboratory Directed Research andDevelopment program at LANL.

This research has made use of the XRT Data AnalysisSoftware (XRTDAS) developed under the responsibility ofthe ASI Science Data Center (ASDC), Italy. At Penn Statethe NASA Swift program is support through contract NAS5-00136.

This research was made possible through the use of theAAVSO Photometric All-Sky Survey (APASS), funded bythe Robert Martin Ayers Sciences Fund.

This research has made use of data provided by Astrom-etry.net (Barron et al. 2008).

This paper uses data products produced by the OIRTelescope Data Center, supported by the Smithsonian As-trophysical Observatory.

Observations made with the NASA Galaxy EvolutionExplorer (GALEX) were used in the analyses presented inthis manuscript. Some of the data presented in this paperwere obtained from the Mikulski Archive for Space Tele-scopes (MAST). STScI is operated by the Association ofUniversities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASAcontract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST for non-HST datais provided by the NASA Office of Space Science via grantNNX13AC07G and by other grants and contracts.

Funding for SDSS-III has been provided by the Al-fred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions,the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Depart-ment of Energy Office of Science. The SDSS-III web siteis http://www.sdss3.org/.

This publication makes use of data products from theTwo Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of theUniversity of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing andAnalysis Center/California Institute of Technology, fundedby NASA and the National Science Foundation.

This publication makes use of data products from theWide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint projectof the University of California, Los Angeles, and the JetPropulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology,funded by NASA.

This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Ex-tragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the JetPropulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,under contract with NASA.

REFERENCES

Abbasi R., et al., 2012, A&A, 539, A60

Alam S., et al., 2015, ApJS, 219, 12

Ando S., Beacom J. F., 2005, Physical Review Letters, 95, 061103Ando S., et al., 2013, Reviews of Modern Physics, 85, 1401

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)

ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2015 11

Baltay C., et al., 2013, PASP, 125, 683

Barron J. T., Stumm C., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Roweis S., 2008,AJ, 135, 414

Benetti S., et al., 2015, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 7040

Blondin S., Tonry J. L., 2007, ApJ, 666, 1024Brimacombe J., et al., 2015a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6921

Brimacombe J., et al., 2015b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6943

Brimacombe J., et al., 2015c, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6950Brimacombe J., et al., 2015d, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6959

Brimacombe J., et al., 2015e, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6984

Brown T. M., et al., 2013, PASP, 125, 1031Brown J. S., W.-S Holoien T., Auchettl K., Stanek K. Z.,

Kochanek C. S., Shappee B. J., Prieto J. L., Grupe D., 2016a,preprint, (arXiv:1609.04403)

Brown J. S., Shappee B. J., Holoien T. W.-S., Stanek K. Z.,

Kochanek C. S., Prieto J. L., 2016b, MNRAS, 462, 3993Challis P., Kirshner R., Falco E., 2015a, The Astronomer’s Tele-

gram, 6947

Challis P., Kirshner R., Falco E., Calkins M., 2015b, The As-tronomer’s Telegram, 6956

Chambers K. C., et al., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1612.05560)

Churazov E., et al., 2015, ApJ, 812, 62Conseil E., et al., 2015, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6934

Diehl R., et al., 2014, Science, 345, 1162

Dong S., et al., 2015a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6864Dong S., et al., 2015b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6886

Dong S., et al., 2015c, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6892Dong S., et al., 2016, Science, 351, 257

Drake A. J., et al., 2009, ApJ, 696, 870

Dressler A., et al., 2011, PASP, 123, 288Fabricant D., Cheimets P., Caldwell N., Geary J., 1998, PASP,

110, 79

Fernandez J. M., et al., 2015a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6983Fernandez J. M., et al., 2015b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6989

Fremling C., et al., 2015a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6909

Fremling C., et al., 2015b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6974Frieman J. A., et al., 2008, AJ, 135, 338

Gal-Yam A., Mazzali P. A., Manulis I., Bishop D., 2013, PASP,

125, 749Godoy-Rivera D., et al., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1605.00645)

Gonzalez C., et al., 2015, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6919Gorbovskoy E. S., et al., 2013, Astronomy Reports, 57, 233

Harutyunyan A. H., et al., 2008, A&A, 488, 383

Herczeg G. J., et al., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1607.06368)Hodgkin S. T., Wyrzykowski L., Blagorodnova N., Koposov S.,

2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Lon-

don Series A, 371, 20120239Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2014a, MNRAS, 445, 3263

Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2014b, ApJ, 785, L35

Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2015a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6894Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2015b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6990

Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2016a, preprint, (arXiv:1604.00396)

Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2016b, Acta Astron., 66, 219Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2016c, MNRAS, 455, 2918

Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2016d, MNRAS, 463, 3813

Horiuchi S., Beacom J. F., 2010, ApJ, 723, 329Horiuchi S., Beacom J. F., Kochanek C. S., Prieto J. L., Stanek

K. Z., Thompson T. A., 2011, ApJ, 738, 154Horiuchi S., Beacom J. F., Bothwell M. S., Thompson T. A., 2013,

ApJ, 769, 113

Kato T., et al., 2014a, PASJ, 66, 30Kato T., et al., 2014b, PASJ, 66, 90

Kato T., et al., 2015, PASJ, 67, 105Kato T., et al., 2016, PASJ, 68, 65Kiyota S., et al., 2015a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6870Kiyota S., et al., 2015b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6915

Kiyota S., et al., 2015c, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6936Kiyota S., et al., 2015d, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6945

Kiyota S., et al., 2015e, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6979

Kochanek C. S., et al., 2001, ApJ, 560, 566

Law N. M., et al., 2009, PASP, 121, 1395Leloudas G., et al., 2016, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0002

Li W. D., et al., 2000, in Holt S. S., Zhang W. W., eds,

American Institute of Physics Conference Series Vol. 522,American Institute of Physics Conference Series. pp 103–106

(arXiv:astro-ph/9912336), doi:10.1063/1.1291702

Li W., et al., 2011, MNRAS, 412, 1441Martini P., et al., 2011, PASP, 123, 187

Milisavljevic D., Villar V. A., Lunnan R., Drout M., PatnaudeD., Berger E., 2015, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6948

Morrell N., Phillips M. M., Contreras C., Busta L., Hsia E. Y.,

2015a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6920Morrell N., et al., 2015b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6988

Murase K., Thompson T. A., Lacki B. C., Beacom J. F., 2011,

Physical Review D, 84, 043003Nakamura K., Horiuchi S., Tanaka M., Hayama K., Takiwaki T.,

Kotake K., 2016, MNRAS, 461, 3296

Nyholm A., et al., 2015, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6994Ochner P., et al., 2015, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6925

Pastorello A., et al., 2015, MNRAS, 453, 3649

Pignata G., et al., 2009, in Giobbi G., Tornambe A., RaimondoG., Limongi M., Antonelli L. A., Menci N., Brocato E., eds,

American Institute of Physics Conference Series Vol. 1111,American Institute of Physics Conference Series. pp 551–554

(arXiv:0812.4923), doi:10.1063/1.3141608

Quimby R. M., 2006, PhD thesis, The University of Texas atAustin

Schlafly E. F., Finkbeiner D. P., 2011, ApJ, 737, 103

Schmidt S. J., et al., 2014, ApJ, 781, L24Schmidt S. J., et al., 2016, ApJ, 828, L22

Shappee B. J., et al., 2014, ApJ, 788, 48

Shappee B. J., et al., 2015a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6867Shappee B. J., et al., 2015b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6882

Shappee B. J., et al., 2016, ApJ, 826, 144

Simon J., Morrell N., Phillips M. M., 2015, The Astronomer’sTelegram, 6905

Skrutskie M. F., et al., 2006, AJ, 131, 1163Tomasella L., et al., 2015, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6899

Tonry J. L., 2011, PASP, 123, 58

Wright E. L., et al., 2010, AJ, 140, 1868Wyrzykowski L., et al., 2014, Acta Astron., 64, 197

Zhang J., Wang X., 2015a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 6949

Zhang J., Wang X., 2015b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 7006

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)

12 T. W.-S. Holoien et al.

Table

1.

AS

AS

-SN

Su

per

novae

IAU

Dis

covery

Off

set

Age

SN

Nam

eN

am

ea

Date

RA

bD

ec.b

Redsh

ift

Vdiscc

Vpeakc

(arc

sec)d

Typ

eat

Dis

c.e

Host

Nam

eD

iscovery

AT

el

Cla

ssifi

cati

on

AT

el

ASA

SSN

-15ab

—2015-0

1-0

2.3

3210:4

6:3

5.0

4−

38:2

8:2

4.6

0.0

1780

16.3

15.5

25.8

6II

n—

ESO

325-G

045

Dong

et

al.

(2015a)

Shapp

ee

et

al.

(2015b)

ASA

SSN

-15ad

—2014-1

2-2

9.1

895:5

6:1

3.0

6−

16:0

5:5

1.0

0.0

2400

16.3

16.3

14.6

7Ia

-4P

GC

902451

Shapp

ee

et

al.

(2015a)

Shapp

ee

et

al.

(2015b)

ASA

SSN

-15ae

—2015-0

1-0

1.6

3237:4

6:2

7.1

2+

34:2

5:5

5.8

0.0

3124

17.4

16.4

4.9

8Ia

-52M

ASX

J15510599+

3425520

Kiy

ota

et

al.

(2015a)

Tom

ase

lla

et

al.

(2015)

ASA

SSN

-15aj

—2015-0

1-0

8.3

0163:1

3:1

8.9

1−

32:5

5:3

4.9

0.0

1092

15.0

14.7

6.3

6Ia

-3N

GC

3449

Dong

et

al.

(2015b)

Sim

on

et

al.

(2015)

ASA

SSN

-15ak

—2015-0

1-0

9.2

23:0

0:2

3.1

8+

26:2

3:3

7.3

0.0

1503

15.1

14.7

3.3

6Ia

-91T

—U

GC

00110

Dong

et

al.

(2015c)

Tom

ase

lla

et

al.

(2015)

ASA

SSN

-15al

—2015-0

1-1

0.3

374:2

7:2

4.4

4−

21:3

5:3

4.1

0.0

3200

17.0

16.8

7.2

0Ia

0G

AL

EX

ASC

J045749.4

6H

olo

ien

et

al.

(2015a)

Fre

mling

et

al.

(2015a)

ASA

SSN

-15ar

—2015-0

1-1

3.2

837:0

5:0

5.3

9+

10:2

3:0

3.8

0.0

2882

17.6

16.6

21.0

6Ia

-6C

GC

G439-0

10

Kiy

ota

et

al.

(2015b)

Ochner

et

al.

(2015)

ASA

SSN

-15as

—2015-0

1-1

3.4

4144:4

9:0

8.2

6+

6:2

5:4

8.5

0.0

2800

16.4

16.1

3.4

0Ia

-1SD

SS

J093916.6

9+

062551.1

Gonzale

zet

al.

(2015)

Morr

ell

et

al.

(2015a)

ASA

SSN

-15az

—2015-0

1-1

4.4

6167:0

9:2

3.9

8−

10:1

4:5

7.8

0.0

2832

16.3

16.3

19.0

0Ia

-12M

ASX

J11083863-1

014456

Bri

macom

be

et

al.

(2015a)

Ochner

et

al.

(2015)

ASA

SSN

-15ba

—2015-0

1-1

5.6

4211:1

3:4

6.3

4+

8:5

5:1

4.5

0.0

2313

16.6

15.8

0.8

6Ia

-5SD

SS

J140455.1

2+

085514.0

Conse

ilet

al.

(2015)

Challis

et

al.

(2015a)

ASA

SSN

-15bb

—2015-0

1-1

6.2

7195:1

6:3

5.6

9−

36:3

6:0

0.2

0.0

1587

16.3

16.3

10.2

4II

-2E

SO

381-I

G048

Kiy

ota

et

al.

(2015c)

Milis

avlj

evic

et

al.

(2015)

ASA

SSN

-15b

c—

2015-0

1-1

6.3

161:3

3:3

9.6

0−

8:5

3:0

8.3

0.0

3672

17.1

16.9

3.6

4Ia

-72M

ASX

J04061478-0

853112

Bri

macom

be

et

al.

(2015b)

Zhang

&W

ang

(2015a)

ASA

SSN

-15b

d—

2015-0

1-1

7.6

3238:3

9:3

4.9

6+

16:3

6:3

8.1

0.0

0795

16.8

16.0

1.0

8II

b—

SD

SS

J155438.3

9+

163637.6

Kiy

ota

et

al.

(2015d)

Challis

et

al.

(2015b)

ASA

SSN

-15b

e—

2015-0

1-1

9.0

743:1

1:3

5.8

4−

34:1

8:5

2.5

0.0

2190

16.4

15.6

7.0

0Ia

-10

GA

LE

XA

SC

J025245.8

3B

rim

acom

be

et

al.

(2015c)

Morr

ell

et

al.

(2015b)

ASA

SSN

-15bf

—2015-0

1-1

9.1

269:4

0:1

6.5

0−

41:3

7:2

6.2

0.0

4853

17.7

16.1

4.7

7Ia

82M

ASX

J04384102-4

137212

Bri

macom

be

et

al.

(2015d)

Fre

mling

et

al.

(2015b)

ASA

SSN

-15bk

—2015-0

1-1

9.6

2236:0

3:0

6.4

4+

11:1

6:1

6.4

0.0

3428

17.2

17.1

6.9

9Ia

-1C

GC

G078-0

56

Kiy

ota

et

al.

(2015e)

Morr

ell

et

al.

(2015b)

ASA

SSN

-15bm

—2015-0

1-2

2.3

6226:2

7:5

3.7

1−

5:3

7:3

7.1

0.0

2060

16.6

15.5

0.1

4Ia

-10

GA

LE

XA

SC

J150551.5

6Fern

andez

et

al.

(2015a)

Morr

ell

et

al.

(2015b)

ASA

SSN

-15bn

—2015-0

1-2

3.6

3238:5

3:5

0.2

4+

66:4

3:1

9.3

0.0

2800

16.7

16.1

7.6

9Ia

-2G

AL

EX

ASC

J155536.5

7B

rim

acom

be

et

al.

(2015e)

Zhang

&W

ang

(2015b)

ASA

SSN

-15b

o—

2015-0

1-2

2.5

8221:1

3:4

8.2

9+

24:3

4:4

3.7

0.0

3630

17.1

16.1

0.3

2Ia

-9SD

SS

J144455.2

1+

243443.9

Fern

andez

et

al.

(2015b)

Benett

iet

al.

(2015)

ASA

SSN

-15cb

—2015-0

1-2

1.5

4189:5

7:3

3.4

4+

3:4

7:4

9.7

0.0

4004

16.8

16.8

0.5

1Ia

-1V

CC

1810

Holo

ien

et

al.

(2015b)

Nyholm

et

al.

(2015)

This

table

isavailable

init

senti

rety

ina

machin

e-r

eadable

form

inth

eonline

journ

al.

Ap

ort

ion

issh

ow

nhere

for

guid

ance

regard

ing

its

form

and

conte

nt.

“G

AL

EX

ASC

”gala

xy

nam

es

have

been

abbre

via

ted

for

space

reaso

ns.

aIA

Unam

eis

not

pro

vid

ed

ifone

was

not

giv

en

toth

esu

pern

ova.

bR

ight

asc

ensi

on

and

declinati

on

are

giv

en

inth

eJ2000

ep

och.

cA

llm

agnit

udes

are

V-b

and

magnit

udes

from

ASA

S-S

N.

dO

ffse

tin

dic

ate

sth

eoff

set

of

the

SN

inarc

seconds

from

the

coord

inate

sof

the

host

nucle

us,

taken

from

NE

D.

eD

iscovery

ages

are

giv

en

indays

rela

tive

top

eak.

All

ages

are

appro

xim

ate

and

are

only

list

ed

ifa

cle

ar

age

was

giv

en

inth

ecla

ssifi

cati

on

tele

gra

m.

Table

2.

Non

-AS

AS

-SN

Su

per

novae

IAU

Dis

covery

Off

set

SN

Nam

eN

am

ea

Date

RA

bD

ec.b

Redsh

ift

mpeakc

(arc

sec)d

Typ

eH

ost

Nam

eD

iscovere

dB

ye

Recovere

d?f

2015B

2015B

2015-0

1-0

5.1

212:5

4:3

5.5

3-1

2:3

4:1

8.6

0.0

1544

15.0

10.2

0Ia

NG

C4782

Am

ate

urs

Yes

LSQ

15z

—2015-0

1-0

7.0

013:0

8:2

2.4

8-8

:43:5

7.8

0.0

7000

17.0

3.0

6Ia

2M

ASX

J13082255-0

844002

LSQ

No

2015C

2015C

2015-0

1-0

7.6

013:1

8:3

0.4

7-1

4:3

6:4

4.6

0.0

0964

16.4

12.6

0II

IC4221

LO

SS

No

2015A

2015A

2015-0

1-0

9.6

49:4

1:1

5.5

535:5

3:1

7.4

0.0

2339

16.6

24.7

0Ia

NG

C2955

Am

ate

urs

Yes

PSN

J13522411+

3941286

—2015-0

1-0

9.9

013:5

2:2

4.1

139:4

1:2

8.6

0.0

0722

15.6

18.6

5II

nN

GC

5337

Am

ate

urs

Yes

2015W

2015W

2015-0

1-1

2.2

86:5

7:4

3.0

313:3

4:4

5.7

0.0

1329

16.2

34.8

9II

UG

C03617

LO

SS

Yes

2015E

2015E

2015-0

1-1

3.4

23:1

3:3

5.3

10:1

5:0

3.1

0.0

4145

16.1

1.6

1Ia

KU

G0311+

000

KIS

SN

oC

SS150120:0

53013-1

65338

—2015-0

1-2

0.0

05:3

0:1

3.0

8-1

6:5

3:3

7.1

0.0

2000

17.0

N/A

IIN

one

CR

TS

No

PSN

J11105565+

5322493

—2015-0

1-2

3.1

411:1

0:5

5.6

553:2

2:4

9.3

0.0

0955

17.0

29.1

5II

NG

C3549

CR

TS

No

PSN

J10491665-1

938253

—2015-0

2-0

2.0

010:4

9:1

6.6

5-1

9:3

8:2

5.3

0.0

1403

16.8

12.0

4II

PE

SO

569-G

012

Am

ate

urs

No

2015bh

2015bh

2015-0

2-0

7.3

99:0

9:3

4.9

633:0

7:2

0.4

0.0

0649

15.4

16.4

0II

n/L

BV

NG

C2770

CR

TS

Yes

2015H

2015H

2015-0

2-1

0.5

410:5

4:4

2.1

6-2

1:0

4:1

3.8

0.0

1246

16.0

33.1

1Ia

-02cx

NG

C3464

Am

ate

urs

Yes

PSN

J13471211-2

422171

—2015-0

2-1

2.5

213:4

7:1

2.1

1-2

4:2

2:1

7.1

0.0

1991

15.1

6.0

8Ia

ESO

509-G

108

Am

ate

urs

Yes

PSN

J10234760+

3348477

—2015-0

2-1

3.3

110:2

3:4

7.6

033:4

8:4

7.7

0.0

3389

17.0

23.0

2II

bU

GC

05623

Am

ate

urs

No

2015U

2015U

2015-0

2-1

3.3

47:2

8:5

3.8

733:4

9:1

0.6

0.0

1379

14.9

5.9

2Ib

nN

GC

2388

LO

SS

Yes

iPT

F15ku

2015b

q2015-0

2-1

4.4

312:3

5:0

6.3

731:1

4:3

5.4

0.0

2818

16.9

15.0

0Ia

-91T

KU

G1232+

315

PT

FY

es

CSS150214:1

40955+

173155

2015b

o2015-0

2-1

4.4

414:0

9:5

5.1

317:3

1:5

5.6

0.0

1620

16.8

59.0

8Ia

-91bg

NG

C5490

CR

TS

Yes

PSN

J19235601-5

955321

—2015-0

2-1

6.6

419:2

3:5

6.0

1-5

9:5

5:3

2.1

0.0

1308

15.1

18.6

0Ia

NG

C6782

Am

ate

urs

No

PSN

J20580766-5

147074

—2015-0

2-2

2.1

320:5

8:0

7.6

6-5

1:4

7:0

7.4

0.0

1567

16.3

10.2

0II

bFA

IRA

LL

0927

Am

ate

urs

No

2015X

2015X

2015-0

2-2

3.2

27:1

6:4

2.5

829:5

1:2

2.7

0.0

1072

16.0

6.2

4II

UG

C03777

LO

SS

No

This

table

isavailable

init

senti

rety

ina

machin

e-r

eadable

form

inth

eonline

journ

al.

Ap

ort

ion

issh

ow

nhere

for

guid

ance

regard

ing

its

form

and

conte

nt.

aIA

Unam

eis

not

pro

vid

ed

ifone

was

not

giv

en

toth

esu

pern

ova.

Inso

me

case

sth

eIA

Unam

em

ay

als

ob

eth

epri

mary

sup

ern

ova

nam

e.

bR

ight

asc

ensi

on

and

declinati

on

are

giv

en

inth

eJ2000

ep

och.

cA

llm

agnit

udes

are

taken

from

D.

W.

Bis

hop’s

Bri

ght

Sup

ern

ova

websi

te,

as

desc

rib

ed

inth

ete

xt,

and

may

be

from

diff

ere

nt

filt

ers

.d

Off

set

indic

ate

sth

eoff

set

of

the

SN

inarc

seconds

from

the

coord

inate

sof

the

host

nucle

us,

taken

from

NE

D.

e“A

mate

urs

”in

dic

ate

sdis

covery

by

any

num

ber

of

non-p

rofe

ssio

nal

ast

ronom

ers

,as

desc

rib

ed

inth

ete

xt.

fIn

dic

ate

sw

heth

er

the

sup

ern

ova

was

indep

endentl

yre

covere

din

ASA

S-S

Ndata

or

not.

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)

ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2015 13

Table

3.

AS

AS

-SN

Su

per

nova

Host

Gala

xie

s

SN

SN

SN

Off

set

Gala

xy

Nam

eR

edsh

ift

Nam

eT

yp

e(a

rcse

c)

AV

am

NU

Vb

muc

mgc

mrc

mic

mzc

mJd

mH

dm

KS

d,e

mW

1m

W2

ESO

325-G

045

0.0

1780

ASA

SSN

-15ab

IIn

27.0

30.3

01

16.3

60.0

2—

——

——

14.8

10.0

814.1

00.0

913.9

50.1

613.0

80.0

312.9

70.0

3P

GC

902451

0.0

2400

ASA

SSN

-15ad

Ia14.6

70.5

77

——

——

——

>16.5

>15.7

14.0

60.0

6*

14.6

00.0

314.6

40.0

52M

ASX

J15510599+

3425520

0.0

3124

ASA

SSN

-15ae

Ia4.9

80.0

85

17.6

20.0

317.5

60.0

216.2

70.0

015.8

30.0

015.5

90.0

015.4

50.0

115.0

20.0

914.6

60.1

614.2

20.1

514.2

60.0

314.1

10.0

4N

GC

3449

0.0

1092

ASA

SSN

-15aj

Ia6.3

60.2

09

16.1

70.0

3—

——

——

9.7

00.0

29.0

00.0

28.7

00.0

39.6

00.0

29.5

70.0

2U

GC

00110

0.0

1503

ASA

SSN

-15ak

Ia-9

1T

3.6

0.1

18

17.0

00.0

116.6

60.0

215.3

60.0

014.8

80.0

014.6

70.0

014.6

10.0

1>

16.5

>15.7

13.4

50.0

6*

13.9

90.0

313.8

50.0

4G

AL

EX

ASC

J045749.4

60.0

3200

ASA

SSN

-15al

Ia7.2

0.0

94

18.9

10.0

7—

——

——

>16.5

>15.7

14.8

10.0

6*

15.3

50.0

415.0

80.0

6C

GC

G439-0

10

0.0

2882

ASA

SSN

-15ar

Ia21.0

60.2

99

——

——

——

12.3

30.0

311.6

60.0

411.3

00.0

712.1

50.0

212.1

10.0

2SD

SS

J093916.6

9+

062551.1

0.0

2800

ASA

SSN

-15as

Ia3.4

0.1

24

21.7

30.1

421.0

20.2

319.8

50.0

419.6

10.0

519.4

40.0

619.5

60.2

2>

16.5

>15.7

>15.6

——

2M

ASX

J11083863-1

014456

0.0

2832

ASA

SSN

-15az

Ia19

0.1

71

21.8

00.4

6—

——

——

13.7

60.0

613.0

30.0

512.6

30.1

012.9

80.0

413.0

20.0

4SD

SS

J140455.1

2+

085514.0

0.0

2313

ASA

SSN

-15ba

Ia0.8

60.0

70

19.7

60.0

419.1

90.1

018.0

40.0

217.5

90.0

217.3

60.0

217.2

10.0

6>

16.5

>15.7

15.8

30.0

8*

16.3

70.0

616.1

40.1

7E

SO

381-I

G048

0.0

1587

ASA

SSN

-15bb

II10.2

40.1

30

16.2

00.0

2—

——

——

>16.5

>15.7

12.6

40.0

5*

13.1

80.0

212.9

50.0

32M

ASX

J04061478-0

853112

0.0

3672

ASA

SSN

-15b

cIa

3.6

40.1

19

——

——

——

14.0

20.0

613.3

60.0

713.0

50.1

113.1

10.0

312.9

50.0

3SD

SS

J155438.3

9+

163637.6

0.0

0795

ASA

SSN

-15b

dII

b1.0

80.0

94

—17.7

00.0

216.9

90.0

016.6

50.0

016.5

70.0

116.4

80.0

1>

16.5

>15.7

14.1

90.0

6*

14.7

30.0

314.6

00.0

5G

AL

EX

ASC

J025245.8

30.0

2190

ASA

SSN

-15b

eIa

70.0

54

18.6

10.0

5—

——

——

>16.5

>15.7

15.0

50.0

6*

15.5

90.0

415.4

10.0

72M

ASX

J04384102-4

137212

0.0

4853

ASA

SSN

-15bf

Ia4.7

70.0

69

——

——

——

13.7

70.0

613.2

10.0

812.9

90.1

312.6

20.0

912.5

30.0

2C

GC

G078-0

56

0.0

3428

ASA

SSN

-15bk

Ia6.9

90.1

25

18.2

30.0

217.3

00.0

215.8

00.0

015.0

20.0

014.6

10.0

014.2

70.0

113.4

50.0

512.7

30.0

512.3

70.0

912.5

40.0

212.3

80.0

2G

AL

EX

ASC

J150551.5

60.0

2060

ASA

SSN

-15bm

Ia0.1

40.2

21

17.8

70.0

5—

——

——

12.9

20.0

512.3

50.0

711.8

40.0

912.2

10.0

212.2

00.0

2G

AL

EX

ASC

J155536.5

70.0

2800

ASA

SSN

-15bn

Ia7.6

90.0

86

18.8

30.0

6—

——

——

>16.5

>15.7

14.7

10.0

6*

15.2

50.0

315.1

90.0

5SD

SS

J144455.2

1+

243443.9

0.0

3630

ASA

SSN

-15b

oIa

0.3

20.1

16

20.6

70.2

819.7

30.0

518.7

00.0

118.2

80.0

118.0

50.0

117.8

60.0

3>

16.5

>15.7

15.2

90.0

6*

15.8

30.0

416.0

00.1

2V

CC

1810

0.0

4004

ASA

SSN

-15cb

Ia0.5

10.0

90

17.5

60.0

116.7

90.0

115.6

40.0

015.1

40.0

014.8

60.0

014.6

70.0

113.7

30.0

612.9

60.0

612.9

60.1

212.7

50.0

212.5

60.0

3

This

table

isavailable

init

senti

rety

ina

machin

e-r

eadable

form

inth

eonline

journ

al.

Ap

ort

ion

issh

ow

nhere

for

guid

ance

regard

ing

its

form

and

conte

nt.

Uncert

ain

tyis

giv

en

for

all

magnit

udes,

and

inso

me

case

sis

equal

tozero

.“G

AL

EX

ASC

”gala

xy

nam

es

have

been

abbre

via

ted

for

space

reaso

ns.

aG

ala

cti

cexti

ncti

on

taken

from

Schla

fly

&F

inkb

ein

er

(2011).

bN

om

agnit

ude

islist

ed

for

those

gala

xie

snot

dete

cte

din

GA

LE

Xsu

rvey

data

.c

No

magnit

ude

islist

ed

for

those

gala

xie

snot

dete

cte

din

SD

SS

data

or

those

locate

douts

ide

of

the

SD

SS

footp

rint.

dFor

those

gala

xie

snot

dete

cte

din

2M

ASS

data

,w

eass

um

ean

upp

er

lim

itof

the

fain

test

gala

xy

dete

cte

din

each

band

from

our

sam

ple

.e

KS

-band

magnit

udes

mark

ed

wit

ha

“*”

indic

ate

those

est

imate

dfr

om

the

WIS

EW

1-b

and

data

,as

desc

rib

ed

inth

ete

xt.

Table

4.

Non

-AS

AS

-SN

Su

per

nova

Host

Gala

xie

s

SN

SN

SN

Off

set

Gala

xy

Nam

eR

edsh

ift

Nam

eT

yp

e(a

rcse

c)

AV

am

NU

Vb

muc

mgc

mrc

mic

mzc

mJd

mH

dm

KS

d,e

mW

1m

W2

NG

C4782

0.0

1544

2015B

Ia10.2

00.1

46

16.6

50.0

1—

——

——

8.8

20.0

18.1

00.0

17.8

30.0

29.4

80.0

29.5

40.0

22M

ASX

J13082255-0

844002

0.0

7000

LSQ

15z

Ia3.0

60.0

98

19.5

70.0

7—

——

——

15.0

50.0

914.3

20.1

013.9

30.1

513.5

40.0

313.1

60.0

3IC

4221

0.0

0964

2015C

II12.6

00.2

23

——

——

——

11.4

10.0

310.7

20.0

310.4

80.0

611.6

50.0

211.6

10.0

2N

GC

2955

0.0

2339

2015A

Ia24.7

00.0

30

15.7

10.0

214.6

90.0

013.2

20.0

012.6

00.0

012.1

90.0

011.8

90.0

011.1

60.0

210.4

70.0

410.1

70.0

310.6

70.0

210.5

20.0

2N

GC

5337

0.0

0722

PSN

J13522411

IIn

18.6

50.0

39

16.4

70.0

114.8

20.0

113.2

10.0

012.4

90.0

012.1

20.0

011.8

10.0

010.9

70.0

210.3

20.0

210.0

70.0

311.1

30.0

211.1

90.0

2U

GC

03617

0.0

1329

2015W

II34.8

90.3

80

——

——

——

14.1

80.0

513.5

60.0

713.4

80.1

013.6

90.0

313.5

80.0

3K

UG

0311+

000

0.0

4145

2015E

Ia1.6

10.2

29

19.2

80.0

218.2

10.0

216.8

20.0

016.1

50.0

015.7

70.0

015.4

70.0

114.2

90.0

413.5

90.0

513.4

00.0

713.0

70.0

312.9

30.0

3N

one

0.0

2000

CSS150120:0

53013

IIN

/A

0.1

93

——

——

——

>16.5

>15.7

15.9

40.1

5*

16.5

80.1

416.7

00.3

5N

GC

3549

0.0

0955

PSN

J11105565

II29.1

50.0

35

15.1

90.0

014.6

10.0

112.8

20.0

012.0

40.0

011.6

70.0

011.4

10.0

010.1

50.0

29.4

50.0

29.1

80.0

311.4

50.0

311.5

10.0

2E

SO

569-G

012

0.0

1403

PSN

J10491665

IIP

12.0

40.1

11

16.7

90.0

2—

——

——

10.6

70.0

29.9

30.0

29.6

10.0

39.8

50.0

29.6

90.0

2N

GC

2770

0.0

0649

2015bh

IIn/L

BV

16.4

00.0

62

14.7

90.0

1—

——

——

10.5

20.0

29.8

10.0

39.5

70.0

411.6

40.0

211.5

90.0

2N

GC

3464

0.0

1246

2015H

Ia-0

2cx

33.1

10.1

50

14.9

90.0

115.2

20.0

113.4

50.0

012.6

10.0

012.1

80.0

011.8

70.0

010.6

10.0

39.8

90.0

39.6

50.0

511.2

70.0

211.2

70.0

2E

SO

509-G

108

0.0

1991

PSN

J13471211

Ia6.0

80.2

03

19.1

70.1

0—

——

——

10.9

90.0

210.2

90.0

310.0

30.0

310.4

40.0

210.5

30.0

2U

GC

05623

0.0

3389

PSN

J10234760

IIb

23.0

20.0

67

—16.8

80.0

215.7

80.0

015.3

70.0

015.1

80.0

015.0

20.0

1>

16.5

>15.7

13.7

60.0

7*

14.4

00.0

314.0

90.0

4N

GC

2388

0.0

1379

2015U

Ibn

5.9

20.1

59

18.0

00.0

316.2

10.0

114.2

80.0

013.1

20.0

012.5

60.0

012.0

50.0

010.8

30.0

110.0

30.0

29.6

50.0

29.6

30.0

29.1

60.0

2K

UG

1232+

315

0.0

2818

iPT

F15ku

Ia-9

1T

15.0

00.0

37

18.4

50.0

018.1

10.0

317.0

10.0

116.5

50.0

116.3

10.0

116.1

20.0

2>

16.5

>15.7

14.3

30.0

7*

14.9

70.0

314.7

20.0

6N

GC

5490

0.0

1620

CSS150214:1

40955

Ia-9

1bg

59.0

80.0

73

17.9

20.0

414.7

70.0

112.7

50.0

011.9

10.0

011.4

90.0

011.2

10.0

010.0

10.0

19.3

00.0

29.0

30.0

29.7

10.0

29.7

50.0

2N

GC

6782

0.0

1308

PSN

J19235601

Ia18.6

00.1

63

15.4

80.0

0—

——

——

9.9

00.0

19.2

10.0

28.9

60.0

29.6

20.0

29.5

40.0

2FA

IRA

LL

0927

0.0

1567

PSN

J20580766-

IIb

10.2

00.0

99

——

——

——

11.8

60.0

311.1

20.0

410.8

60.0

511.0

80.0

210.8

50.0

2U

GC

03777

0.0

1072

2015X

II6.2

40.1

62

—21.7

40.1

720.7

50.0

719.3

60.0

219.0

50.0

218.7

60.0

512.0

30.0

411.3

30.0

511.0

40.0

711.9

30.0

211.8

60.0

2

This

table

isavailable

init

senti

rety

ina

machin

e-r

eadable

form

inth

eonline

journ

al.

Ap

ort

ion

issh

ow

nhere

for

guid

ance

regard

ing

its

form

and

conte

nt.

Uncert

ain

tyis

giv

en

for

all

magnit

udes,

and

inso

me

case

sis

equal

tozero

.“P

SN

”and

“C

SS”

sup

ern

ova

nam

es

have

been

abbre

via

ted

for

space

reaso

ns.

aG

ala

cti

cexti

ncti

on

taken

from

Schla

fly

&F

inkb

ein

er

(2011).

bN

om

agnit

ude

islist

ed

for

those

gala

xie

snot

dete

cte

din

GA

LE

Xsu

rvey

data

.c

No

magnit

ude

islist

ed

for

those

gala

xie

snot

dete

cte

din

SD

SS

data

or

those

locate

douts

ide

of

the

SD

SS

footp

rint.

dFor

those

gala

xie

snot

dete

cte

din

2M

ASS

data

,w

eass

um

ean

upp

er

lim

itof

the

fain

test

gala

xy

dete

cte

din

each

band

from

our

sam

ple

.e

KS

-band

magnit

udes

mark

ed

wit

ha

“*”

indic

ate

those

est

imate

dfr

om

the

WIS

EW

1-b

and

data

,as

desc

rib

ed

inth

ete

xt.

MNRAS 000, 000–000 (0000)