ARCHAEOTOURISM – THE PAST IS OUR FUTURE? Agnieszka Rozenkiewicz University of Wrocław Institute...
-
Upload
dortha-owens -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
4
Transcript of ARCHAEOTOURISM – THE PAST IS OUR FUTURE? Agnieszka Rozenkiewicz University of Wrocław Institute...
ARCHAEOTOURISM – ARCHAEOTOURISM – THE PAST IS OUR FUTURE?THE PAST IS OUR FUTURE?
Agnieszka RozenkiewiczUniversity of WrocławInstitute of Geography and Regional DevelopmentDepartment of Regional Geography and Tourism
Frances McGettigan Athlone Institute of Technology
Department of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure Studies
PRESENTATION PLANPRESENTATION PLAN
1. Introduction to archaeotourism Archaeological resources of Ireland
2. Between culture, heritage and archaeology - the place of archaeological sites in the interests of tourism
3. Investigation into the visitor experience at archaeological sites - the case study of Newgrange
a. Aim and objectivesb. Methodologyc. Presentation of the results
4. Conclusions and recommendations for further research
1. INTRODUCTION TO ARCHAEOTOURISM1. INTRODUCTION TO ARCHAEOTOURISM
ArchaeotourismArchaeotourism
1. A tourism category that places emphasis on two critical issues, i.e. conservation of historical-archaeological sites as well as the propagation and dissemination of interest in the heritage of the past epochs (adapted after Baram 2008).
References:Baram, U. (2008) ‘Tourism and Archaeology’, in Pearsall, D. M., ed., Encyclopedia of Archaeology, Vol. 3, Amsterdam and London: Elsevier/Academic Press, 2131-2134.
Al-Busaidi, Y. S. A. (2008) Public Interpretation of Archaeological Heritage and Archaeotourism in the Sultanate of Oman, (PhD), Cardiff School of Management.
2. ‘A form of heritage-based tourism in which archaeological landscape represents a core-motivation or peripheral-motivation for on-site visits and/or off-site experience, e.g. museums, travelling exhibitions. It also includes all structural aspects (e.g. organizations and policies) as well as operational processes (e.g. marketing and tour guiding) which are relative to archaeological heritage in a particular area’ (Al-Busaidi 2008, p.53).
1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND
rich supply of cultural and heritage attractions
an audit of the Irish national heritage in 1985 indicated the existence of 200,000 known archaeological sites and monuments, and 60,000 buildings of architectural or historic interest (Page 1994)
authenticity, uniqueness
Page , S. J. (1994) ‘Developing Heritage Tourism in Ireland in the 1990s’, Tourism Recreation Research, 19, 79-89.
NORTH-WESTNORTH-WESTCarrowmore Megalithic CemeteryCarrowmore Megalithic Cemetery
County SligoCounty Sligo
Source: Goireland.com (2011)
Source: Tripadvisor.com (2011)
1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND
WESTWESTCCééide Fieldside FieldsCounty MayoCounty Mayo
Source: Picasaweb.google.com (2011)
Source: Gaelsirishtravel.com (2008)
1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND
SHANNON REGIONSHANNON REGIONThe BurrenThe Burren
County ClareCounty Clare
Poulnabrone DolmenPoulnabrone DolmenSource: Globtroter.pl (2011)
1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND
SOUTH-WESTSOUTH-WESTSkellig MichaelSkellig MichaelCounty KerryCounty Kerry
Source: Sacredsites.com (2010)
1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND
Source: Ringofkerrytourism.com (2011)
SOUTH-EASTSOUTH-EASTRock of CashelRock of Cashel
County TipperaryCounty Tipperary
Source: National-geograpchic.pl (2011)
1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND
MIDLANDS & EAST COASTMIDLANDS & EAST COASTBrBrúú na Bóinne na BóinneCounty MeathCounty Meath
Source: Own collection (2011)
1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF IRELAND
HERITAGE TOURISMHERITAGE TOURISM
• Protected heritage tourism
Archaeological tourism/archaeotourism
Tourism to historic objects and places
Museum tourism Thanatourism
• Ethnographic tourism
• Homeland tourism
• Sentimental/nostalgic tourism
CONTEMPORARY CULTURE CONTEMPORARY CULTURE TOURISMTOURISM
• Event tourism
• Contemporary arts tourism
• Tourism to objects of contemporary architecture
• Tourism to theme parks
• Clubbing tourism
CULTURAL TOURISMCULTURAL TOURISM
Source: adapted after Buczkowska (2008)
Buczkowska, K. (2008) Turystyka Kulturowa: Przewodnik Metodyczny, Poznań: Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego im. Eugeniusza Piaseckiego w Poznaniu.
2. BETWEEN CULTURE, HERITAGE AND ARCHAEOLOGY …2. BETWEEN CULTURE, HERITAGE AND ARCHAEOLOGY …
GENERAL TYPOLOGY OF CULTURAL TOURISM RESOURCESGENERAL TYPOLOGY OF CULTURAL TOURISM RESOURCES
1) Attractionsa) Monuments
Religious buildingsPublic buildingsHistoric housesCastles and palacesParks and gardensDefencesArchaeological sitesIndustrial-archaeological
buildings
b) MuseumsFolklore museumsArt museums
c) RoutesCultural-historic routesArt routes
d) Theme ParksCultural-historic parksArchaeological parksArchitecture parks
2) Eventsa) Cultural-historic events
Religious festivalsSecular festivalsFolk festivals
b) Art eventsArt exhibitionsArt festivals
c) Events and attractionsOpen Monument Days
Source: Munsters (1994 cited in Munsters 1996)
Munsters, W. (1996) ‘Cultural Tourism in Belgium’, in Richards, G., ed., Cultural Tourism in Europe, Wallingford: CABI (Re-issued in 2005 in electronic format by ATLAS), 80-92.
2. BETWEEN CULTURE, HERITAGE AND ARCHAEOLOGY …2. BETWEEN CULTURE, HERITAGE AND ARCHAEOLOGY …
3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT 3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGEARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGE
Research aim: To investigate the visitor experience at archaeological sites using the example of Newgrange
Methodology: Questionnaire-based quantitative research method Sample group = 50 (dictated by the requirements for the Honours Degree in Tourism and Hospitality Management at Athlone Institute of Technology) Research was conducted at Brú na Bóinne Visitor Centre on Sunday the 27th of February 2011 The overall number of visitors to Newgrange on that day was 263
Objective 1: To identify motivations behind the visit to Newgrange
Objective 2: To examine the visitor perception of archaeological sites as tourist attractions based on the example of Newgrange
3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT 3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGEARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGE
Visitor Age
4% 6%
40%34%
10%2% 4% 14 or less
15 - 24
25 - 34
35 - 44
45 - 54
55- 64
65 or over
18%
2% 6% 4% 2% 4%
18%26%
2%
16%
2%0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Visitors
American
Austrian
BritishCzech
FinnFrench
German
IrishItalian
PolishSlovene
Nationality
Visitor Nationality
Figure 1
Figure 2
Visitor profile
Gender ratio:50% females50% males
Visitor Nationality:Domestic visitors 60%(including Northern Ireland)the Irish and British 47% Poles 27%Germans 13%Czechs 7%Americans Italians 6%
3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT 3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGEARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGE
Visitor Education
4% 10%
12%
36%
28%
10%
Primary school
Secondary school
Vocational education
Bachelor degree
Master degree
Doctoral degree
Figure 3
Visitor Occupation
14%
14%
18%8%
16%
30% Clerical/Administrative worker
Director/Manager
Doctor, lawyer, teacher
Manual worker
Service or sales worker
Other
Figure 4
Visitor profile
3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT 3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGEARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGE
Figure 5
0%
48%
16% 16%
48%
4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Visitors
AloneWith a spouse/partner
With children
With other family members
With friendsWith an organised group
Sightseeing Group Types
Figure 6
38%
8%
30%
8%12%
4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
VIsitors
1 2 3 4 5 7
Number of companions
Size of Sightseeing Groups
Sightseeing group specifications
3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT 3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGEARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGE
Figure 7Motivations behind the visit to Newgrange
38%
4%
36%
20%
30%
2% 0%8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Visitors
Sources of information
Sources of Information that Prompted the Visit
The main purpose for undertaking the trip to Newgrange visit to the archaeological site (82%) holiday (10%) visiting family and friends (6%) other (2%)
3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT 3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGEARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGE
Figure 8
70%
28%
50%
16%
28%
2%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Visitors
Historicalsignificance
Authenticity Uniqueness Spiritualatmosphere
Naturalenvironment
Other
Features
Features of Newgrange that Encouraged the VisitMotivations behind the visit to Newgrange
Was the fact that Newgrange (as a part of the Archaeological Ensemble of the Bend of the Boyne) is designated a World Heritage Site by UNESCO one of the criteria of value and decisive factors behind your visit? Yes (36%) No (64%)
Taking into account your interests and motivations for today’s visit, does the term archaeological tourist suit you? Yes (64%) No (36%)
3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT 3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGEARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGE
Figure 9
26%
0%4%
14%
24%
6%0%
10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Visitors
Burren Céide Fields Clonmacnoise Hill of Tara Rock ofCashel
SkelligMichael
Stone Forts ofAran Islands
Other
Archaeological sites
Archaeological Sites Visited within the Last YearMotivations behind the visit to Newgrange
Visitor profile ofArchaeotourists
Gender ratio: 38% females, 62% malesAge distribution: 15 – 24 9%25 – 34 47%35 - 44 28%45 or older 16%
Education:Doctoral degree 6%Master degree 31%Bachelor degree 41%Vocational education 13%Secondary school 9%
3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT 3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGEARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGE
Figure 10
25%
3% 3% 6% 3% 3%
22%13%
3%
19%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Visitors
AmericanAustrian
BritishCzech
Finn FrenchGerman
Irish ItalianPolish
Nationality
Nationality of ArchaeotouristsVisitor profile ofArchaeotourists
Domestic visitors 53%Overseas visitors 47%Occupation:
24% Students19% Directors/Managers19% Doctors, lawyers, teachers16% Clerical/administrative workers16% Service or sales workers 6% Manual workers
3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT 3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGEARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGE
access to the site length of stay evaluation of tourist facilities and services archaeological sites as tourist attractions assessment of the visitor experience
Visitor perception of archaeological sites as tourist attractions
Access to the site 92% of the surveyed visitors reached the site using a private mode of transport (a car, a motorcycle, etc.) and only 8% decided to visit Newgrange with the use of public transportation access to the site did not pose any difficulties for 82% of visitors 12% of visitors reported having problems reaching the site due to not adequate signage 6% of visitors were not sure how to rate it
Length of stayLess than 2 hours 62%From 2 to 3 hours 8%From 3 to 5 hours 30%
3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT 3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGEARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGE
Evaluation of Tourist Facilities and Services in Newgrange
2%2% 2%6%4%
68%
2% 4%
44% 44%
64%
52%
70%
40%
48%
62%
36%
22%
14%
34%
44%
18%
34%30%
44%
36%
14%18%
42%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Visitor Centre Exhibitions andReplicas
Guide Services TouristInformation
Office
Restaurant Gift shop DisabledFacilities
Parking Toilet Facilities
Facilities & Services
Vis
ito
rs
Very unsatisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Not sure
Satsfactory
Very satisfactory
Figure 11
Visitor perception of archaeological sites as tourist attractions
Preferred ways of sightseeing archaeological sites
8% Individually
44 % With a guide
48% Partially individually and partially with a guide
3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT 3. INVESTIGATION INTO THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGEARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – THE CASE STUDY OF NEWGRANGE
Figure 12
70%
4%10% 6% 10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Visitors
Guide services Guidebooks Exhibitions andreplicas
Films andmultimedia
presentations
Informationboards
Importance of Elements Facilitating Understandingand Interpretation of Archaeological Heritage
Visitor perception of archaeological sites as tourist attractions
Indicate the MAIN role of archaeologicalsites as tourist attractions Educational 56% Cultural 34% Recreational 10%
Tick ONE of the statements below that you agree the most with Protection of archaeological sites in Ireland should be increased and direct access for tourists
reduced (22%) Protection of archaeological sites in Ireland and promotion to the public are at an acceptable
level (56%) More tourists should gain direct access to archaeological sites in Ireland (22%)
Visitor experience Excellent 66% Good 32% Fair 2%
4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCHRESEARCH
Archaeotourism is a separate and significant subcategory of tourism
High quantitative potential and outstanding features of the archaeological heritage of Ireland may play a pivotal role as the attracting force for future visitors
Further research including the detailed profile of archaeological tourists, in particular comprising their needs and expectations towards the Irish archaeological sites as tourist attractions should be undertaken
The existence of exceptionally well-preserved archaeological attractions, that in many cases provide high-class tourist facilities, should be promoted
‘Smart’ marketing campaigns raising the visitors’ awareness of this angle of the Irish tourism potential can be seen as one of the routes to the recovery of the tourism industry in Ireland
THANK YOU THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTIONFOR YOUR ATTENTION