Appendix D Cone Penetration Testing Report

The AirfieldsDeesidePlots H6 & H7

4671 Praxis Real Estate Management Limited

Appendix D Cone Penetration Testing Report

LANKELMA Limited

Cold Harbour Barn, Cold Harbour Lane, Iden East Sussex, TN31 7UT

T: +44 (0)1797 280050 E: [email protected]

www.lankelma.com

Project ref.: P-107234-7

THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE

SOIL INVESTIGATION

CPT REPORT

Cone penetration test Magnetometer test

Geotechnical data interpretation


Report no. P-107234-7R00CP

PROJECT:

The Airfields Deeside

CLIENT:

JPG

FIELDWORK

CPT rig(s) 18.5-tonne rubber-tracked CPT unit (UK8) Date fieldwork started 11th July 2019 Date fieldwork completed 11th July 2019 Lankelma’s representative Emma Stickland Client’s representative Molly Peckham

REPORT

Status Revision Action Date Name

Final 00 Completed 19/07/19 Chris Player Checked 19/07/19 Emma Stickland Approved 19/07/19 Joseph Hobbs



CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 1

DISCLAIMER 1

COMPLETED WORKS 1

FIELDWORK GENERAL 1

CONE PENETRATION TESTS 2 CPT Data Reduction and Presentation 2 In-situ Stress Conditions 3 Soil Behaviour Type 4 Soil Behaviour Type Index – Ic 4 Relative Density 5 Undrained Shear Strength 5 Overconsolidation Ratio 7 SPT N60 Values 8 Friction Angle 8

Coefficient of Volume Change 10 Young’s Modulus 10

MAGNETOMETER TESTING 11

CPT INTERPRETATION NOTES 11

REFERENCES 14

APPENDIX A SUMMARY TABLES

APPENDIX B GENERAL INFORMATION

APPENDIX C CONE PENETRATION TEST RESULTS

APPENDIX D STANDARD INTERPRETATION RESULTS - SET 1

APPENDIX E STANDARD INTERPRETATION RESULTS - SET 2


1 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP

INTRODUCTION

At the request of JPG, a soils investigation was carried out on project The Airfields Deeside.

Site location (in the general region of):

The Airfields Deeside CH5 2RD

DISCLAIMER

The investigation information, raw data and interpretations provided in this report are for the sole benefit of the Client identified at the front of the report.

Lankelma has exercised reasonable skill, care and diligence in the fieldwork and preparation of this report. This report has been completed based on information available to Lankelma at the time of preparation. The measurement and interpreted data in this report do not constitute recommendations for design purposes. An appropriately qualified person must review and interpret the data given in this report, together with any assumptions we have made that affect the data, before using the data for design or recommendation.

Lankelma accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or appropriateness of any assumptions, derived soil parameters, soil descriptions or soil unit boundaries contained in this report.

COMPLETED WORKS

• 8 nr. combined magnetometer-cone penetration tests (CPTu) with piezo measurement; and

• Factual report plus additional geotechnical data interpretation. The Summary Tables section contains tabulated summaries of the works completed together with analysis results where necessary.

FIELDWORK GENERAL

Fieldwork was performed with an 18.5-tonne rubber-tracked CPT unit (UK8) equipped with a 15-tonne capacity hydraulic ram set.

The Client was responsible for the positioning and re-survey of all investigative locations.

The target depth for the investigation was 15 m below ground level. Table 1 details the final test depths and reasons for test termination (refusal factor). Where penetration refusal was



encountered the termination depth was advised to, and agreed with, the Client’s on-site representative.

CONE PENETRATION TESTS

Cone penetration testing was carried out in general accordance with BS ISO 22476-1:2012.

Penetrometer measurements included cone tip resistance, friction sleeve resistance and dynamic pore water pressure sampled at a 10 mm resolution.

The penetrometer was calibrated in accordance with BS8422:2003 and ASTM E74-13a. The management of calibration records is in accordance with ISO 10012. Copies of all calibration certificates for the cones used are provided in Appendix B.

The piezometer filter element was in the u2 position and was vacuum saturated. The pore pressure system was saturated with de-aired 10000 cSt silicone oil.

CPT DATA REDUCTION AND PRESENTATION

The CPT results are presented in Appendix C. The corrected cone resistance (qt), local side friction (fs), dynamic pore water pressure (u2), friction ratio (Rf) and inclination are all presented against depth and elevation in accordance BS ISO 22476-1:2012. CPT data and the associated derived geotechnical parameters are included in the AGS 3.1 and 4.0 data files provided.

The cone tip resistance and sleeve force measurements were converted to pressures using the nominal dimensions of the penetrometer.

For piezocone tests the corrected tip resistance was calculated according to the formula:

𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡 = 𝑞𝑞𝑐𝑐 + 𝑢𝑢2 × (1 − 𝑎𝑎)

Where 𝑎𝑎 is the ‘area ratio’ and (1- 𝑎𝑎) is the proportion of cross-sectional area between the cone tip and cone body where pore pressures (positive or negative) can act to add or subtract from the total external axial force on the tip. The difference between measured and corrected values is largest in low strength soils with large excess pore pressures. The relationship between measured resistance, excess pressure and correction difference is described by the curves in the following chart for alpha factor of 0.8:



Figure 5-1 corrected tip resistance fraction with measured tip resistance

Penetration length readings were corrected for inclination and sleeve readings were depth corrected for the dimensional offset between cone tip and sleeve during post processing. An additional shift of -80 mm was applied to the sleeve to account for tip failure zone offset (see ‘CPT Interpretation Notes’). ‘Rod spikes’, artefacts of the pause for push rod addition, were filtered from the cone tip and sleeve data.

The raw (or corrected) data are presented in Appendix C.

Geotechnical parameters appropriate for drained and undrained cone penetration conditions were derived for corresponding drained and undrained derived soil behaviour types (SBTs) respectively, however, to account for uncertainty in the SBT correlation with drainage behaviour, all parameters were derived over a range of transitional soils within the range 2.4 < Ic < 2.7 (see section 6.3).

In general, the engineering parameters derived are intended for non-cemented predominantly silicate soils.

IN-SITU STRESS CONDITIONS

The in-situ total and effective stress state was calculated based on an assumed total unit weight of 17 kN/m3 above the principal phreatic surface and 18 kN/m3 below.

The depth of the principal phreatic surface, or groundwater table, was taken as equal to the groundwater level(s) provided by the Client.

Note: The term phreatic surface is used here, however when it is based on piezocone measurements it is assumed that the piezometric level (under hydrostatic conditions) and groundwater table coincide. The phreatic or piezometric surface reported is intended to provide information about the assumed pore pressure distribution for calculation of relevant derived parameters from the CPT and may not represent the true position of the groundwater table or perched water bodies. Complex groundwater pressure distributions, if they are observed from the measurements, will be applied to relevant derived parameters.



SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE

The soil behaviour type (SBT) was interpreted using the Robertson (1990) classification system based on the normalised cone resistance (Qt) and normalised friction sleeve resistance (Fr) for silicate soils.

While the classification based on normalised parameters is considered more accurate, particularly at depths exceeding 15-20 m, the classification is often significantly in error (artificially granular/drained) at very shallow depth (< 1-3 m). The error at shallow depth is associated with the potentially large difference between the estimated vertical effective stress (applied in normalisation) and the unknown horizontal stress influencing penetration resistance.

Robertson (2010) proposed a non-normalised version of the 1990 chart which uses dimensionless cone resistance (qc/Pa) and friction ratio, Rf. The classification according to this chart can be more reliable at shallow depth and has been plotted as an approximate SBT index (discussed below) for comparison to the normalised classification.

The SBT chart is provided in Appendix B – General Information, titled ‘CPT Soil Behaviour Type Chart’.

It should be noted that the SBT classification provides the general soil ‘type’ which typically provides a similar CPT measurement range of qc and fs. Correspondingly, it will also show biased towards the soil fraction that dominates the mechanical behaviour. While the repeatability and behavioural bias of the SBT is usually beneficial, the classification is not always an appropriate substitute for classification based on grain-size distribution.

The results are presented on the plots of Appendix D.

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE INDEX – IC

The main trend in soil behaviour type (SBT) variation can be expressed a continuous index, IC, proposed by Robertson and Wride (1998) based on a similar index proposed by Jefferies and Davies (1993). The index provides a continuous profile of SBT variation with depth for end-user analysis of soil units and variation within units.

The equivalent non-normalised version, as proposed by Robertson (2010), is provided for comparison.

The basis of Ic and its approximation of the original chart classification zones may be seen from Appendix B figure ‘CPT Soil Behaviour Type Chart’. The method does not identify zones 1 (sensitive fine grained) and zones 8 & 9 (overconsolidated or cemented).

Normalised SBT index IC (Robertson and Wride, 1998):

𝐼𝐼𝑐𝑐 = [(3.47− log 𝑄𝑄𝑡𝑡)2 + (𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐹𝐹𝑟𝑟 + 1.22)2]0.5

Non-normalised SBT index IC (Robertson, 2010):



𝐼𝐼𝑐𝑐 = ��3.47− log �𝑞𝑞𝑐𝑐𝜎𝜎𝑎𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑎

��2

+ (𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑅𝑅𝑓𝑓 + 1.22)2�

0.5

(See glossary of terms and symbols Appendix B)


RELATIVE DENSITY

The relative density of sands was calculated based on an empirical relationship proposed by Jamiolkowski et al. (2001) based on a large database of undisturbed frozen samples and calibration chamber tests. The expected accuracy may be evaluated from the figures presented below.

𝐷𝐷𝑟𝑟 = 100 �0.268 ∙ ln�𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡 𝜎𝜎𝑎𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑎⁄

�𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣′ 𝜎𝜎𝑎𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑎⁄� − 𝑘𝑘�


𝑘𝑘 = Compressibility dependant constant can be taken as -0.675 for medium compressibility (applied value in our interpretation), <= 1 for high compressibility and >= 2 for compressible sands.

Figure 5-2 Relative density with normalised tip stress and sand compressibility from calibration chamber tests (left) and undisturbed frozen samples (right). Jamiolkowski et al. (2001). Reproduced from Mayne (2007).

The results are presented on the plots of Appendix E– Standard interpretation results (set 2).

UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH

The undrained shear strength su is usually estimated as a factor of net cone tip resistance (Lunne et al, 1981):

𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑢 =𝑞𝑞𝑐𝑐 − 𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣0

𝑁𝑁𝑘𝑘



where Nk is an empirical cone factor which varies with soil type, stress history, structure/fabric, plasticity and the mode of shearing.


Mayne and Peuchen (2018) performed and evaluation of 407 high-quality triaxial compression tests against net tip resistance and proposed Nkt factors with regression analysis details for five categories of clays shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Summary of CAUC su versus qnet for clays. Reproduced from Mayne and Peuchen (2018).

Clay Group Number of sites

No. Data Correlation Coefficient r2

Factor Nkt Mean Pore Pressure Parameter Bq

Offshore NC-LOC 17 115 0.98 12.32 0.51

Onshore NC-LOC 30 191 0.867 12 0.53

Sensitive NC-LOC 5 43 0.507 10.33 0.84

OC Intact 5 36 0.862 13.57 0.49

OC Fissured 5 22 0.393 22.47 -0.01

All clays 62 407 0.923 13.33 0.55

Alternatively, a variable Nkt factor can be estimated for the profile as a function of the pore pressure parameter Bq, applicable for Bq values of > -0.01. The following equation proposed by Mayne and Peuchen is based on the same database evaluation:

𝑁𝑁𝑘𝑘𝑡𝑡 = 10.5 − 4.6 ∙ ln�𝐵𝐵𝑞𝑞 + 0.1�

Where the pore pressure parameter Bq is the ratio of excess pore pressure to net tip resistance:

𝐵𝐵𝑞𝑞 = 𝑢𝑢2 − 𝑢𝑢0𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡 − 𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣0

The Nkt estimate has a standard error of 2.4 Nk and correlation coefficient of 0.645.

The estimate based on Bq is presented as ‘su5’ on the parameter plots and is only suitable for tests that have a high-quality pore pressure data, often indicated by a positive, repeatable and dynamic response. For tests that have a reliable pore pressure response throughout, the evaluation on a point by point basis is warranted. For projects with variable response quality and with possible piezo desaturation (for example in the unsaturated zone or by dilation/cavitation) it is preferable to identify zones with reliable pore pressure response for representative soils and select a characteristic value of Bq for evaluation of Nkt. Lankelma are not always in view of the effort that has been made in preparation of the test location to maintain saturation of the piezo sensor.



Note: Nkt (with subscript ‘t’) indicates a Nk factor that has been established using the corrected tip resistance qt. Nkt can be applied to the uncorrected tip resistance qc (non-piezocone tests) but results in a slightly lower estimate of su depending on the correction magnitude (qc - qt) in lower strength soils. Undrained shear strengths corresponding to selected values of Nk are presented on the plots of Appendix D. ‘su3’ on the logs (Nk = 15) has been included as a reference for comparison to traditional arbitrary Nk values of 15 and 20.

OVERCONSOLIDATION RATIO

The preconsolidation stress 𝜎𝜎𝑝𝑝′ was calculated based on the method proposed by Mayne et al (2009):

𝜎𝜎𝑝𝑝′ = 𝑘𝑘 ∙ (𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡 − 𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣)𝑎𝑎′

𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑅𝑅 = 𝜎𝜎𝑝𝑝′/𝜎𝜎′𝑣𝑣0′


Mayne et al found that the trend with mean grain size followed a power law through the addition of exponent m’ and that its value can be estimated by relation to soil behaviour type index Ic:

𝑚𝑚′ = 1 − 0.28

1 + 𝐼𝐼𝑐𝑐2.65

25

Figure 5-3 Preconsolidation stress with net cone resistance power law, reproduced from Mayne (2014).

An additional 𝜎𝜎𝑝𝑝′ and OCR was calculated for 𝑚𝑚′ = 1.1 to reflect the upper trend for over consolidated fissured clays not captured by the soil behaviour type index Ic



SPT N60 VALUES

Equivalent SPT N60 values, defined as the non-normalised SPT blow count over a 30 cm interval, were derived for two correlations and are presented together in the results section for comparison.

Method 1 - Lunne et al. (1997)

𝑁𝑁60 =𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡

8.5 ∙ 𝜎𝜎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑚𝑚 ∙ �1− 𝐼𝐼𝑐𝑐4.6�

Method 2 - Robertson (2012)

�𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎�

𝑁𝑁60= 10(1.268−0.2817𝐼𝐼𝑐𝑐)


The correlations are intended for clays, silts and sands and not for carbonates or cemented geo-materials.

The results are presented in Appendix D.

FRICTION ANGLE

Sands

The peak friction angle of granular materials was calculated using the Kulhawy and Mayne (1990) method and is an empirical relationship as a function of stress normalised cone tip resistance. The relationship is based on a calibration chamber database from 24 sands of varying mineralogy. The relationship has the form:

ф′ = 17.6 + 11.0 ∙ log (𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡1 )

Where:

ф′ = Peak friction angle (degrees)

𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡1 = stress normalised cone resistance =

�𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡𝜎𝜎𝑎𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑎

� / �𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣0′𝜎𝜎𝑎𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑎

�0.5

The presence of compressible minerals tends to reduce tip resistance resulting in lower estimate of friction angle, while very coarse (sand) or larger grain size tends to increase tip resistance resulting in higher estimate.



Figure 5-4 Peak triaxial friction angle from undisturbed sands with normalised cone resistance.

Fine grained soils

The effective friction angle for fine grained soils was calculated based on the Senneset et al. (1988, 1989) method by applying the approximate closed form solution by Mayne & Campanella (2005) as a direct function of the pore pressure parameter Bq and normalised tip resistance Q. The method is applicable where 0.1 < Bq < 1.0 and 20° < ф′< 45°and generally appropriate for non-cemented NC-LOC soils.

ф′ = 29.5° 𝐵𝐵𝑞𝑞0.121[0.256 + 0.336 𝐵𝐵𝑞𝑞 + log𝑄𝑄]

Figure 5-5 [Left] Theoretical curves with function approximation (dots) overlay [Right] calibration data from geotechnical centrifuge tests for a variety of soils. Redrawn from Ouyang & Mayne (2018).

The results are presented in Appendix E.



COEFFICIENT OF VOLUME CHANGE

Coefficient of volume change (mv) defined as the inverse of the constrained modulus (M), is evaluated for all soil types using the constrained modulus method proposed by Mayne (2006) cited in Mayne (2007) applicable to the present state of vertical effective stress up to the pre-consolidation stress.

𝑚𝑚𝑣𝑣 =1𝑀𝑀

Where:

𝑀𝑀 = 𝛼𝛼 ∙ (𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡 − 𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣)

𝛼𝛼 = 5

An alpha factor of 8.25 reported by Kulhawy & Mayne (1990) for fine grained soils appears to provide a better fit through the data for intact non-organic clays, reducing to around 1 to 2 for organic plastic clays.

Figure 5-6 Constrained modulus of Mayne (2006). Annotated/redrawn from NCHRP Synthesis 368 (2007).


YOUNG’S MODULUS

The Young’s Modulus at 25% mobilised shear strength (FOS = 4) was calculated according to the method proposed by Robertson (2009):



𝐸𝐸′ = 𝛼𝛼(𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡 − 𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣) Where:

𝛼𝛼 = 0.015(100.55𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰+1.68)


The method described by Robertson may be adapted to estimate E’ for loading at different percentages of yield stress.

The results are presented in Appendix E.

MAGNETOMETER TESTING

A combined CPT/magnetometer was used at prescribed locations to provide the data for in-site safety management of UXO risk. As such, no data has been processed or reported here in.

The magnetometer used in the Lankelma magcone system comprises a Bartington Instruments 3-axis flux gate magnetometer that is capable of measuring disturbances in the Earth’s field of less than 1 part in a million. Buried ferrous items, such as UXO, result in localized distortions of the magnetic field. The detection radius of the works undertaken was dependent upon the level of magnetic field distortion noise and the size of the ferrous object(s) of interest. The magnetometer data was reviewed in real-time.

The magnetometer probe was pushed into the soil using a standard CPT rig up to a maximum applied force of 15 Tonnes.

CPT INTERPRETATION NOTES

Provided below is a non-exhaustive set of notes on interpretation of the acquired CPT data with reference to examples within the dataset where appropriate.

DRAINED AND UNDRAINED SOIL BEHAVIOUR

Geotechnical parameters appropriate for drained and undrained cone penetration conditions are derived for drained and undrained soil behaviour types (SBTs) respectively, however, to help mitigate the uncertainty in the SBT correlation with drainage behaviour, all parameters are derived over the Soil Behaviour Type range 2.4 < Ic < 2.7. For partially drained conditions, error will be introduced within derived parameters.

Piezocone dynamic pore pressure and dissipation tests may be used to identify drainage conditions. Dissipation t50 values exceeding 50 seconds indicate undrained penetration behaviour based on the findings of Kim et al. (2008).



In partially drained materials the friction sleeve resistance may rise significantly immediately following a pause in penetration due to consolidation and increased effective stress on the friction sleeve.

DYNAMIC PORE PRESSURE DATA (CPTu)

While the piezo system is saturated before use, testing through unsaturated soils may result in some degree of desaturation leading to a less accurate and more ‘sluggish’ pore pressure response. Desaturation can also occur during penetration due to suction during dilative shear at the cone shoulder. Dissipation tests that are undertaken following desaturation are likely to have a more pronounced initial rise and some degree of error will be present in the analysis.

If the system becomes desaturated it may or may not re-saturate at higher excess pressures later in the test. The pore pressure response in saturated contractive soils normally have a dynamic ‘peaky’ appearance.

The tip resistance in lower strength contractive soils without pore pressure measurement in the u2 position is likely to be significantly lower than the equivalent corrected tip resistance depending on the magnitude of pore pressure acting in the gap between cone tip and cone body.

CONE TIP AND SLEEVE OFFSET

The accuracy of the SBT over thin layers and at layer boundaries is sensitive to offset error in the friction ratio often seen as sharp spikes or drops at boundaries. The friction ratio is often inaccurate in heavily disturbed soils with a ‘blocky’ macro fabric.

For this investigation a friction sleeve depth offset correction of -80mm was applied together with a 5-point moving average on the friction ratio to minimise the influence of this effect.

CONE TYPE

The reference cone type has a 10 cm2 projected cone tip area and 150 cm2 friction sleeve area, however it is common to use the larger 15 cm2 cone with 225 cm2 friction sleeve area for improved sensitivity and penetration depth potential. Use of the 15 cm2 cone will produce more pronounced transitions zones and thin layer effects (larger zone of influence and failure zone).

TRANSITION ZONES AND THIN LAYER EFFECTS

During penetration at the boundary between soils of contrasting stiffness, a transition zone is often evident prior to mobilisation of the true soil stiffness. These should be cautiously ignored in assessment of soil behaviour type and parameter evaluation. Where the stiff layer is thin (<~0.75 m) mobilised resistance may be significantly less than that of an equivalent thick layer. The effect for thin low stiffness layers is less significant. Procedures for thin-layer effect correction are provided by Robertson and Wride (1998).

GRAVELS



The presence of gravel or larger clasts in a soil is often characterised by short peaks in the CPT tip and sleeve readings, possibly with associate inclinometer ‘shake’ and/or sharp reductions in pore water readings due to dilation effects. Frequent gravels in soft or loose soils may generate localised erroneous friction ratio values.



REFERENCES

ASTM E74-13a (2013), Standard Practice of Calibration of Force-Measuring Instruments for Verifying the Force Indication of Testing Machines, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. British Standards Institution (2003) BS 8422:2003, Force measurement – Strain gauge load cell systems – Calibration method. London: British Standards Institution. Houlsby, G.T. and Teh, C.I. (1988) “Analysis of the Piezocone in Clay”. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Penetration Testing (ISOPT-1), Orlando, Vol. 2, pp. 777-783. Balkema Pub., Rotterdam. ISO 10012:2003 Measurement management systems - Requirements for measurement processes and measuring equipment. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards (2003). ISO 22476-1:2012 Geotechnical investigation and testing - Field testing - Part 1: Electrical cone and piezocone penetration test. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards (2012). ISSMGE, 1999. International reference test procedure for the cone penetrometer test CPT and the cone penetration test CPTU, Report of ISSMGE TC16 on Ground Property Characterisation for in situ Testing, In Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 3:2195-222 (1999). Jamiolkowski, M., LoPresti, D.C.F., and Manassero, M. (2001) “Evaluation of Relative Density and Shear Strength of Sands from Cone Penetration Test and Flat Dilatometer Test”. Soil Behaviour and Soft Ground Construction (GSP119), American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 201-238. Reston, Va. 2001 Jefferies, M.G. and Davies M.P. (1993),” Use of CPTu to estimate equivalent SPT N60”, Geotechnical Testing Journal, 16(4), pp. 458-467. Kim, K., Prezzi, M., Salgado, R., and Lee, W. (2008) “Effect of Penetration Rate on Cone Penetration Resistance in Saturated Clayey Soils”, Journal of Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 134(8), pp. 1142-1153. Kulhawy, F.H. and Mayne, P.W. (1990) “Manual on Estimating Soil Properties for Foundation Design”. Report EPRI EL-6800 Research Project 1493-6, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 306. Ladd, C.C. and DeGroot, D.J. (2003) “Recommended Practice for Soft Ground Site Characterization: Arthur Casagrande Lecture”. Soil & Rock America 2003 (Proceedings. 12th Pan American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Boston, MA). Verlag Glückauf, Essen, Germany. pp. 3–57. Lunne, T., Robertson, P.K. and Powell, J.J.M. (1997) “Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice” Blackie Academic, New York 1997. Lunne, T. and Kleven, A. (1981) “Role of CPT in North Sea Foundation Engineering”. Session at the ASCE National Convention: Cone Penetration Testing and Materials. pp. 76-107. American Society of Engineers (ASCE). Mayne, P.W. and Campanella, R.G. (2005) “Versatile Site Characterisation by Seismic Piezocone”. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 2. Millpress, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 2005. pp 721-724. Mayne, P.W. and Peuchen J. (2018), "Evaluation of CPTU Nkt cone factor for undrained strength of clays". Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT'18), 21-22 June 2018, Delft, The Netherlands. CRC Press. pp. 423-429. Mayne, P.W. (2007) “Cone Penetration Testing – A Synthesis of Highway Practice”. NCHRP Synthesis 368, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Mayne, P.W. (2014). KN2: “Interpretation of geotechnical parameters from seismic piezocone tests”. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT'14), June 2014, ISSMGE Technical Committee TC 102, Edited by P.K. Robertson and K.I. Cabal: pp. 47-73. Parez, L. and Fauriel, R. (1988). “Le piézocône. Améliorations apportées à la reconnaissance de sols”. Revue Française de Géotech, Vol. 33, 13-27. Robertson, P.K. (2009). Cited in “Guide to Cone Penetration Testing - 6th edition (2015)”, pp. 58, Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc. Robertson, P.K. (2009). Interpretation of cone penetration tests – a unified approach. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 46, p. 1337–1355. Robertson, P.K. (2010) “Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: an update”. 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing. Huntingdon Beach, CA, USA.



Robertson, P.K. (2012). Interpretation of in-situ tests – some insights, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Geotechnical & Geophysical Site Characterization, ISC’4, Brazil, 1. Robertson, P.K (2014) “Estimating in-situ soil permeability from CPT & CPTu”. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT'14), June, 2014, ISSMGE Technical Committee TC 102. Senneset, K., R. Sandven, and N. Janbu (1989), “Evaluation of Soil Parameters from Piezocone Tests,” Transportation Research Record 1235, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C, pp. 24-37. Sully, J.P., Robertson, P.K., Campanella, R.G. and Woeller, D.J. (1999) “An approach to evaluation of field CPTU dissipation data in overconsolidated fine-grained soils”. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. Vol. 36, pp. 369-381.



APPENDICES



APPENDIX A SUMMARY TABLES

Table 1 CPT summary

Test ID Fina

l dep

th

(mBG

L)

Cone ID {C=Cone tip; F=Friction Sleeve; I= Inclination; P = Piezo; S=Subtraction cone; 15/10 = cone projected area (cm2) )} CP

T ri

g

Pre-

drill

ed /

in

spec

tion

pit

(m

)

Casi

ng d

epth

(m

)

Refu

sal f

acto

r

Dis

sipa

tion

s

Seis

mic

con

e

Sam

ples

East

ing

Nor

thin

g

Elev

atio

n (m

)

Dat

e of

tes

t

Remarks CP301 9.96 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP302 10.20 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP303 10.78 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP304 9.10 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP305 11.46 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP306 7.92 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP307 8.96 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP308 7.84 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019

CPT test plots are presented in Appendix C.



APPENDIX B GENERAL INFORMATION

LIST OF FIGURES

Description Pages included

Cone calibration certificate: S15-CFIP.1526 1

Data sheet: 18.5-tonne rubber-tracked CPT unit (UK8) 1

CPT soil behaviour type chart 1

Glossary of terms 1

REFERENCE INSTRUMENTS:

IDTYPEUNCERTAINTY (±%)

Nominal pressure (MPa,MPa,MPa)Maximum pressure (MPa,MPa,MPa)Area (cm²)Sensitivity (mV/MPa)

Calibration file scaling factor: Nominal cal force (kN, kN, BAR)Calibration number (mV)Zero point (mV)Sensitivity (mV/kN, mV/kN, mV/BAR)Inclination factors (mV)

Measured alpha factor:

Uncertainty (%):ReproducibilityLinearityHysteresisCombined expanded (k=2)

Application class

S15-150kN

X -20°= 455, 0°= 2476, 20°= 4445 / Y -20°= 325, 0°= 2243, 20°= 4129

Calibration signed and dated by: Calibration checked and dated by:

06/09/2019

Instrument: Location: Lankelma Calibration LaboratorySerial Number: S15.CFIIP-1526 Temperature(° C) 19.7Manufacturer: Geopoint Calibration Engineer ed f. white Date of calibration: 07/06/2019 Calibration Expiry

1 1 10.11 0.430.27

0.05 0.07 0.180.02 0.01 0.03

0.80

0.01 0.04 0.09

4554 4691 4253319 273 455

75 75 10

CALIBRATION CERTIFICATEGeopoint-S15-150kN-2MPa

Cone Serial Number: S15.CFIIP-1526

AM DSCC-100kN AM DSCC-100kN Druck DPI 10451998 51998 4009509

CONE END RESISTANCE SLEEVE FRICTION PORE WATER PRESSURE

0.01 0.01 0.05

60.720 62.545 425.287

50.00 3.33 1.00100.00 6.67 2.00

15 225 N/A91.08 1407.27 4252.87

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

0.0 1000.0 2000.0 3000.0 4000.0 5000.0

REFE

RENC

E (M

Pa)

Tip (mV)

CALIBRATION LINE TIP

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

0.0 1000.0 2000.0 3000.0 4000.0 5000.0

REFE

RENC

E (M

Pa)

SLEEVE (mV)

CALIBRATION LINE SLEEVE FRICTION

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

0.00 500.00 1000.00 1500.00 2000.00 2500.00 3000.00 3500.00 4000.00 4500.00 5000.00

REF

EREN

CE

(MPa

)

PWP (mV)

CALIBRATION LINE PORE WATER PRESSURE

www.lankelma.com

Tel: +44 (0)1797 280050 Fax: +44 (0)1797 280195 Email: [email protected]

Lankelma Limited, Cold Harbour Barn, Cold Harbour Lane, Iden, East Sussex. TN31 7UT

Applications Specialist testing

• Seismic

• Pressuremeter

• Magnetometer

• Video cone

• Wing cone

• Push-in Vane

Installations

• VWP

• Piezometer

• Inclinometer

Sampling

• MOSTAP

• Shelby

UK8

TRACKED RIG

TECHNICAL DETAILS

Rig Weight 18.5 T Maximum Operating

Ram Capacity 15 T

Maximum Travelling Speed 15 km/h

Track Material Rubber Track Length 3.40 m Track Width 0.75 m

Maximum Ground Clearance on Jacks 0.21 m

Maximum Ground Bearing Pressure

Tracking / Pushing – 35 kPa

Pulling – 63 kPa

Maximum Testing Gradient

Flat – No Self-Levelling

Maximum Traversing Gradient

35 degrees (operator assessed)

Noise Output at 2 m Testing – 74 dBA Driving – 95 dBA

Clamp Arrangement 36/55 Push Pull Clamp

Ram Stroke 0.70 m Maximum Casing Size 55 mm

Our ‘bogskipper’ tracked rig’s low bearing pressures, large footprint,

and high ground clearance make it ideal for working sites with boggy

or soft ground conditions.

Unique to the UK, this rig is suitable for intertidal projects, peat

bogs and weight-sensitive sites. The rubber tracks minimize

the potential for any damage to delicate infrastructure, such as

a sea wall.

Performance Rates

An expected 100m+ of standard CPTu testing can be

executed in a day (dependent on site conditions and access).



CPT SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE CHART

Non-normalised SBT chart by Robertson et al. (2010) based on dimensionless cone resistance (qc/Pa) and friction ration, Rf, showing contours of Ic index. The chart is also applicable to normalised tip/sleeve values Qt and Fr.

Zone Soil Behaviour Type (SBT)

1 Sensitive fine-grained 6 Sands: clean sand to sandy silt

2 Clay – organic soil 7 Dense sand to gravelly sand

3 Clays: Clay to silty clay 8 Stiff sand to clayey sand*

4 Silt mixtures: clayey silt to silty clay 9 Stiff fine grained*

5 Sand mixtures: Silty sand to sandy silt *Overconsolidated or cemented



GLOSSARY OF CPT TERMS AND SYMBOLS

SYMBOLS qc :- Cone resistance. The total force acting on the cone Qc, divided by the

projected area of the cone, Ac; (qc=Qc/Ac).

qt :- Corrected cone resistance. The cone resistance qc corrected for unequal pore water pressure effects on the cone face and shoulder.

fs :- Friction sleeve resistance. The total frictional force acting on the friction sleeve, Fs, divided by its surface area, As.fs= Fs/As.

Rf :- Friction ratio The ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the sleeve friction, fs,

to the cone resistance, qc, both measured at the same depth; [Rf= (fs/qc) . 100].

qt-net :- Net cone resistance (Method 1) = (qc – σv)

Qt :- Normalised cone resistance (Method 1) = (qc – σv)/σ’v

qt1:- Normalised cone resistance (Method 2) = (qt)/(σ’v)0.5 Fr:- Normalised friction sleeve resistance = fs /(qc- σv)

σv:- Total overburden stress σ’v:- Effective overburden stress

σatm, or, Pa:- Reference atmospheric stress = 100kPa Ic:- Soil Behaviour Type Index

Bq :- Pore pressure ratio. The net pore pressure normalized with respect to the net cone resistance. = (u2 – u0)/(qt -σv)

TERMS Cone (or ‘tip’): - The conical tip section of the cone penetrometer. Friction sleeve: - The section of the cone penetrometer upon which the sleeve friction is measured, located behind the cone tip.

Piezocone: - A cone penetrometer with a pore pressure measurement system.

Dynamic pore pressure: - The pore pressure generated during penetration and measured by a pore pressure sensor on the conical tip face (u1) or just behind the conical tip (u2).



APPENDIX C CONE PENETRATION TEST RESULTS

RAW DATA PLOTS

LIST OF FIGURES:

Location ID Pages included

CP301 1

CP302 1

CP303 1

CP304 1

CP305 1

CP306 1

CP307 1

CP308 1

Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE

Client: JPG

PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)

DissipationTest

InternalQC Diss.

0 2010

Inclination (degrees)

0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650Friction Sleeve Resistance f s (kPa)

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3

Cone Resistance qt (MPa)

DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

Checked by:Chris Player

Date of plot: 12-07-19

Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7

Operator: Walter GeddesCone ID: S15-CFIP.1526

Rig Used: UK8

Date of test: 11/07/2019 09:24:00

Cone area (mm2):1500

Termination Remark: Lateral support

Remarks:*Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value

Location: Deeside, UK

Coordinates: ,

Elevation:Page 1 of 1

TEST ID: CP301

-100

Assumed In-situ Pore Pressure u0 (kPa)

0 100 200 300 400 500

Dynamic Pore Water Pressure u2 (kPa)

6000 82 4 6

Friction Ratio (%)

Pore Pressure Ratio, Bq

1-1 -0.5 0 0.5

Terminated at 9.96 m

DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB001

Phreatic Surface 3.00 m


Client: JPG


DissipationTest

InternalQC Diss.

0 2010


0


2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)





Rig Used: UK8

Date of test: 11/07/2019 10:07:00





Coordinates: ,


TEST ID: CP302

-100


0 100 200 300 400 500


6000 82 4 6

Friction Ratio (%)


1-1 -0.5 0 0.5

32.6

30





Client: JPG


DissipationTest

InternalQC Diss.

0 2010


0


2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)





Rig Used: UK8

Date of test: 11/07/2019 10:54:00





Coordinates: ,


TEST ID: CP303

-100


0 100 200 300 400 500


6000 82 4 6

Friction Ratio (%)


1-1 -0.5 0 0.5

32

29.6





Client: JPG


DissipationTest

InternalQC Diss.

0 2010


0


2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)





Rig Used: UK8

Date of test: 11/07/2019 11:52:00





Coordinates: ,


TEST ID: CP304

-100


0 100 200 300 400 500


6000 82 4 6

Friction Ratio (%)


1-1 -0.5 0 0.5

32.2Terminated at 9.10 m




Client: JPG


DissipationTest

InternalQC Diss.

0 2010


0


2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)





Rig Used: UK8

Date of test: 11/07/2019 12:22:00





Coordinates: ,


TEST ID: CP305

-100


0 100 200 300 400 500


6000 82 4 6

Friction Ratio (%)


1-1 -0.5 0 0.5

30.4





Client: JPG


DissipationTest

InternalQC Diss.

0 2010


0


2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)





Rig Used: UK8

Date of test: 11/07/2019 13:26:00





Coordinates: ,


TEST ID: CP306

-100


0 100 200 300 400 500


6000 82 4 6

Friction Ratio (%)


1-1 -0.5 0 0.5





Client: JPG


DissipationTest

InternalQC Diss.

0 2010


0


2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)





Rig Used: UK8

Date of test: 11/07/2019 14:09:00





Coordinates: ,


TEST ID: CP307

-100


0 100 200 300 400 500


6000 82 4 6

Friction Ratio (%)


1-1 -0.5 0 0.5





Client: JPG


DissipationTest

InternalQC Diss.

0 2010


0


2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)





Rig Used: UK8

Date of test: 11/07/2019 15:04:00





Coordinates: ,


TEST ID: CP308

-100


0 100 200 300 400 500


6000 82 4 6

Friction Ratio (%)


1-1 -0.5 0 0.5






APPENDIX D STANDARD INTERPRETATION RESULTS - SET 1

UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH COEFFICIENT OF VOLUME CHANGE

OVERCONSOLIDATION RATIO SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE (SBT) DESCRIPTIONS

LIST OF FIGURES:


CP301 1

CP302 1

CP303 1

CP304 1

CP305 1

CP306 1

CP307 1

CP308 1

1.04

9.96

Gravelly sand to sand

Sands - clean sand to silty sand

Client: JPG




Operator: Walter Geddes

Elevation:

Coordinates: ,



ConeID: S15-CFIP.1526

Termination Remark:Lateral support

Rig Used: UK8

DissipationTest

Date of test: 11/07/2019 09:24:00



Remarks: *Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated formixed SBTs = Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and

Undrained Behaviour' for discussion.

See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation. Page 1 of 1

InternalQA Diss. TEST ID: CP301

DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

100 300 5000-100

Insitu Pore Pressure

Porewater Pressure, u2 (kPa)

700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Undrained Shear Strength 'su (kPa)

su3 (Nk,15.00) (Reference)

su1 (Nk,12.00) (CAUC) Onshore NC-LOC

su2 (Nk,13.57) (CAUC) OC Intact

su4 (Nk,2.47) (CAUC) OC Fissured

0

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2

0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2

2.4

0.24

Coefficient of Volume Compressibility

mv (m2/MN) Mayne (2006)

00 3010 20

Mayne (2009)

Overconsolidation Ratio

Mayne (2009)OC Fissured Clays

1 2 3

Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic

(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)

4

(3)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil

(7)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(6)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(5)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(4)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25

100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)

(qt Small Scale)


600

Gra

phic

Log

Material Description

Robertson 1990 Extrapolated




0.98

10.20



Client: JPG





Elevation:

Coordinates: ,





Rig Used: UK8

DissipationTest

Date of test: 11/07/2019 10:07:00







DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

100 300 5000-100



700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300






0

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2

0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2

2.4

0.24



00 3010 20

Mayne (2009)



1 2 3


(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)

4

(3)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil

(7)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(6)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(5)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(4)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600

Gra

phic

Log



32.6

30




10.78


Client: JPG





Elevation:

Coordinates: ,





Rig Used: UK8

DissipationTest

Date of test: 11/07/2019 10:54:00







DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

100 300 5000-100



700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300






0

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2

0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2

2.4

0.24



00 3010 20

Mayne (2009)



1 2 3


(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)

4

(3)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil

(7)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(6)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(5)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(4)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600

Gra

phic

Log



32

29.6




9.10


Client: JPG





Elevation:

Coordinates: ,





Rig Used: UK8

DissipationTest

Date of test: 11/07/2019 11:52:00







DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

100 300 5000-100



700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300






0

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2

0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2

2.4

0.24



00 3010 20

Mayne (2009)



1 2 3


(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)

4

(3)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil

(7)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(6)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(5)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(4)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600

Gra

phic

Log






1.52

11.46



Client: JPG





Elevation:

Coordinates: ,





Rig Used: UK8

DissipationTest

Date of test: 11/07/2019 12:22:00







DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

100 300 5000-100



700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300






0

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2

0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2

2.4

0.24



00 3010 20

Mayne (2009)



1 2 3


(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)

4

(3)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil

(7)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(6)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(5)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(4)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600

Gra

phic

Log



30.4




1.22


Client: JPG





Elevation:

Coordinates: ,





Rig Used: UK8

DissipationTest

Date of test: 11/07/2019 13:26:00







DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

100 300 5000-100



700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300






0

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2

0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2

2.4

0.24



00 3010 20

Mayne (2009)



1 2 3


(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)

4

(3)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil

(7)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(6)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(5)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(4)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600

Gra

phic

Log






1.40

8.96



Client: JPG





Elevation:

Coordinates: ,





Rig Used: UK8

DissipationTest

Date of test: 11/07/2019 14:09:00







DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

100 300 5000-100



700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300






0

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2

0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2

2.4

0.24



00 3010 20

Mayne (2009)



1 2 3


(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)

4

(3)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil

(7)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(6)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(5)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(4)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600

Gra

phic

Log






7.84


Client: JPG





Elevation:

Coordinates: ,





Rig Used: UK8

DissipationTest

Date of test: 11/07/2019 15:04:00







DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

100 300 5000-100



700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300






0

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2

0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2

2.4

0.24



00 3010 20

Mayne (2009)



1 2 3


(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)

4

(3)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil

(7)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(6)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(5)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(4)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600

Gra

phic

Log








APPENDIX E STANDARD INTERPRETATION RESULTS - SET 2

EQUIVALENT SPT N60 PEAK FRICTION ANGLE

RELATIVE DENSITY YOUNG’S MODULUS

LIST OF FIGURES:


CP301 1

CP302 1

CP303 1

CP304 1

CP305 1

CP306 1

CP307 1

CP308 1


Cone ID: S15-CFIP.1526

Date of test: 11/07/2019 09:24:00



Coordinates: ,

Elevation:

Coordinate system:


Page 1 of 1

Client: JPG


Date of plot: 12-07-19Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated for mixed SBTs

= Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and Undrained Behaviour'for discussion.

See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation.


TEST ID: CP301

1 42 3

(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600 0 6010 20 30 40 50

Robertson (2012)

Lunne et al. (1997)

SPT N60' Values

0 40 80 120 160 200 240

Robertson (2009)

Young's Modulus E' (MPa)

20 50

Peak Friction Angle phi' (deg)

Kulhaway & Mayne (1990)

25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80

Jamiolkowski et al. (2001)

Relative Density Dr' (%)

(6)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(5)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(4)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(3)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(1)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil






Date of test: 11/07/2019 10:07:00



Coordinates: ,

Elevation:

Coordinate system:


Page 1 of 1

Client: JPG






TEST ID: CP302

1 42 3

(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600 0 6010 20 30 40 50

Robertson (2012)

Lunne et al. (1997)

SPT N60' Values

0 40 80 120 160 200 240

Robertson (2009)


20 50



25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80



(6)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(5)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(4)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(3)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(1)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil

32.6

30






Date of test: 11/07/2019 10:54:00



Coordinates: ,

Elevation:

Coordinate system:


Page 1 of 1

Client: JPG






TEST ID: CP303

1 42 3

(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600 0 6010 20 30 40 50

Robertson (2012)

Lunne et al. (1997)

SPT N60' Values

0 40 80 120 160 200 240

Robertson (2009)


20 50



25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80



(6)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(5)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(4)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(3)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(1)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil

32

29.6






Date of test: 11/07/2019 11:52:00



Coordinates: ,

Elevation:

Coordinate system:


Page 1 of 1

Client: JPG






TEST ID: CP304

1 42 3

(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600 0 6010 20 30 40 50

Robertson (2012)

Lunne et al. (1997)

SPT N60' Values

0 40 80 120 160 200 240

Robertson (2009)


20 50



25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80



(6)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(5)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(4)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(3)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(1)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil






Date of test: 11/07/2019 12:22:00



Coordinates: ,

Elevation:

Coordinate system:


Page 1 of 1

Client: JPG






TEST ID: CP305

1 42 3

(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600 0 6010 20 30 40 50

Robertson (2012)

Lunne et al. (1997)

SPT N60' Values

0 40 80 120 160 200 240

Robertson (2009)


20 50



25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80



(6)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(5)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(4)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(3)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(1)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil

30.4






Date of test: 11/07/2019 13:26:00



Coordinates: ,

Elevation:

Coordinate system:


Page 1 of 1

Client: JPG






TEST ID: CP306

1 42 3

(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600 0 6010 20 30 40 50

Robertson (2012)

Lunne et al. (1997)

SPT N60' Values

0 40 80 120 160 200 240

Robertson (2009)


20 50



25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80



(6)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(5)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(4)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(3)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(1)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil






Date of test: 11/07/2019 14:09:00



Coordinates: ,

Elevation:

Coordinate system:


Page 1 of 1

Client: JPG






TEST ID: CP307

1 42 3

(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600 0 6010 20 30 40 50

Robertson (2012)

Lunne et al. (1997)

SPT N60' Values

0 40 80 120 160 200 240

Robertson (2009)


20 50



25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80



(6)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(5)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(4)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(3)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(1)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil






Date of test: 11/07/2019 15:04:00



Coordinates: ,

Elevation:

Coordinate system:


Page 1 of 1

Client: JPG






TEST ID: CP308

1 42 3

(Non-normalised)

(Stress normalised)


DE

PT

H(m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

EL

EV

AT

ION

(m)

0

0

30

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

5 10 15 20 25


(qt Small Scale)


600 0 6010 20 30 40 50

Robertson (2012)

Lunne et al. (1997)

SPT N60' Values

0 40 80 120 160 200 240

Robertson (2009)


20 50



25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80



(6)

Den

se s

and

to g

rave

lly s

and

(5)

San

ds: c

lean

san

d to

silt

y sa

nd

(4)

San

d m

ixtu

res:

silt

y sa

nd to

san

dy s

ilt

(3)

Silt

Mix

ture

s: c

laye

y si

lt to

silt

y cl

ay

(2)

Cla

ys -

cla

y to

silt

y cl

ay

(1)

Cla

y -

orga

nic

soil






Appendix E Groundwater and Gas Monitoring Results

GAS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS

Site: Plots H6 & H7, The Airfields, Deeside

Job No: 4671 Client: Praxis Real Estate Management Limited

Visit No: 1 Date:

Highest Highest Lowest

CO2 CO2 H2S CO O2

% lel %v/v % % lel %v/v % ppm ppm % Peak Steady (m) bgl

BH301 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 1 2 20.2 0.0 0.0 1.35 9.10

BH302 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1 2 16.9 0.1 0.1 1.20 3.58

BH303 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 3 13 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.92 6.65

BH304 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1 2 19.7 0.0 0.0 1.25 9.41

BH305 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1 3 20.1 0.0 0.0 1.42 3.60

BH306 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 10.6 3 3 13.9 0.0 0.0 2.25 3.86

BH307 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 3 20.9 -0.1 -0.1 1.78 9.58

BH308 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 2 3 20.9 0.0 0.0 1.17 3.80

CH4 0.0 %v/v CO2 0.1 %v/v

O2 20.9 %v/v

Start 1012 Monitoring Equipment: GA5000

End 1014 Serial Number of Equipment: G505491

Rising locally, falling regionally. Date of Last Calibration: 03.May.2019

Sunny spells. Operator: JRP

NR - Not Recorded

Ambient Concentration (% volume):

Barometric Pressure:

Barometric Pressure Trend:

Weather:

NA - Not Applicable

11/07/2019

GWL Base of

Standpipe

Monitoring

Location

Litre/Hour

Gas ConcentrationGas Emission Rate

CH4

Peak Steady

BHCH4

Key Remarks

Checked: Approved:

GAS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS

Site: Plots H6 & H7, The Airfields, Deeside

Job No: 4671 Client: Praxis Real Estate Management Limited

Visit No: 2 Date:

Highest Highest Lowest

CO2 CO2 H2S CO O2

% lel %v/v % % lel %v/v % ppm ppm % Peak Steady (m) bgl

BH301 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0 0 20.3 0.0 0.0 1.46 9.10

BH302 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 3.3 0 0 16.3 0.0 0.0 1.33 3.58

BH303 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 0 19.6 0.0 0.0 0.97 6.65

BH304 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 0 20.2 0.0 0.0 1.29 9.41

BH305 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.7 0 0 19.2 0.0 0.0 1.57 3.60

BH306 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 10.2 0 0 13.8 0.0 0.0 NR 3.86

BH307 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0 0 18.8 0.0 0.0 1.82 9.58

BH308 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0 0 20.1 0.0 0.0 1.23 3.80

CH4 0.0 %v/v CO2 0.1 %v/v

O2 20.9 %v/v

Start 1009 Monitoring Equipment: GA5000

End 1011 Serial Number of Equipment: G505491

Rising locally, falling regionally. Date of Last Calibration: 03.May.2019

Cloudy and dry. Operator: JRP

NR - Not Recorded

Ambient Concentration (% volume):

Barometric Pressure:

Barometric Pressure Trend:

Base of

Standpipe

Peak Steady

CH4 Litre/Hour

18/07/2019

Monitoring

Location

Gas ConcentrationGas Emission Rate

GWL

BHCH4

Weather:

Key Remarks

NA - Not Applicable

Checked: Approved:

Peak CH4 Peak CH4 Steady CH4 Steady CH4 Peak CO2 Peak CO2 Steady CO2 Steady CO2 H2S CO O2 O2 max limiting max limiting Peak Flow Steady Flow SWL SWL

(% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) ppm ppm (% v/v) (% v/v) bh flow bh flow (l/hr) (l/hr) (m bgl) (m bgl)

MIN MAX MIN MAX MIN MAX MIN MAX MAX MAX MIN MAX rate for CH4* rate for CO2** MAX MAX MIN MAX

BH301 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 1 2 20.2 20.3 0 0 0 0 1.35 1.46

BH302 0 0 0 0 0.1 3.3 0.1 3.3 1 2 16.3 16.9 0 0.0033 0.1 0.1 1.20 1.33

BH303 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 3 13 19.6 21.1 0 0 0 0 0.92 0.97

BH304 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 2 19.7 20.2 0 0 0 0 1.25 1.29

BH305 0 0 0 0 1 1.7 1 1.7 1 3 19.2 20.1 0 0 0 0 1.42 1.57

BH306 0 0 0 0 10.2 10.6 10.2 10.6 3 3 13.8 13.9 0 0 0 0 2.25 2.25

BH307 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0 0.2 2 3 18.8 20.9 0 0 0 0 1.78 1.82

BH308 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 2 3 20.1 20.9 0 0 0 0 1.17 1.23

MB Start

MB Finish

Pressure Trend

0 0

0 0 0Rising locally, falling regionally.

1009 0

Cloudy and dry. 0

1011 0

0 0 0

0

SUMMARY OF GROUND GAS MONITORING

BH NO.

** Based on steady CO2 and steady flows.

* Based of peak CH4 and peak flows.

VISIT 1 VISIT 2 VISIT 3 VISIT 4 VISIT 5 VISIT 6

1012

1014



Appendix F Geotechnical Testing Results

5 – 7 Hexthorpe Road, Hexthorpe, Doncaster DN4 0AR tel: +44 (0)844 815 6641 fax: +44 (0)844 815 6642 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected]

A copy of the Laboratory Schedule of accredited tests as issued by UKAS is attached to this report. This certificate is issued in accordance with the accreditation requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. The results

reported herein relate only to the material supplied to the laboratory. This certificate shall not be reproduced other than in full, without the prior written approval of the laboratory.

Checked and Approved Signatories: R Gunson A Watkins R Berriman (Director) (Director) (Quality Manager) S Royle S Eyre L Knight

(Laboratory Manager) (Senior Technician) (Senior Technician) Page 1 of

LABORATORY REPORT

4043

Contract Number: PSL19/4133

Report Date: 23 July 2019 Client’s Reference: 4671 Client Name: JPG Leeds

5 John Charles Way Leeds West Yorkshire LS12 6QD

For the attention of: John Parkinson Contract Title: Airfields

Date Received: 8/7/2019 Date Commenced: 8/7/2019 Date Completed: 23/7/2019 Notes: Opinions and Interpretations are outside the UKAS Accreditation

* Denotes test not included in laboratory scope of accreditation $ Denotes test carried out by approved contractor

Hole Sample Sample Top Base

Number Number Type Depth Depth m m

TP301 2 Bulk 0.00 0.45 MADE GROUND brown sandy silty gravel with many cobbles.TP304 2 Bulk 1.00 1.50 Greyish brown very silty SAND.TP305 2 Bulk 0.15 0.65 Brown clayey very silty SAND.TP308 Dist 0.00 0.50 Brown silty SAND.TP309 2 Bulk 0.50 1.00 Brown slightly gravelly very silty SAND.TP312 Dist 2.20 2.70 Greyish brown very silty SAND.TP314 Dist 0.00 0.50 Greyish brown very silty SAND.TP315 2 Bulk 0.00 0.50 Greyish brown silty SAND.TP317 Dist 0.05 0.50 Greyish brown very silty SAND.TP319 2 Bulk 1.50 2.00 Brown slightly gravelly very silty SAND.TP320 Dist 0.00 0.50 Greyish brown very silty SAND.

Contract No:PSL19/4133Client Ref:

4043 4671

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY SOIL DESCRIPTIONS

Description of Sample

Airfields

(BS1377 : PART 2 : 1990)

Moisture Linear Particle Liquid Plastic Plasticity PassingHole Sample Sample Top Base Content Shrinkage Density Limit Limit Index .425mm Remarks

Number Number Type Depth Depth % % Mg/m3 % % % %m m Clause 3.2 Clause 6.5 Clause 8.2 Clause 4.3/4 Clause 5.3 Clause 5.4

TP301 2 Bulk 0.00 0.45 8.5 2.55TP304 2 Bulk 1.00 1.50 21 2.50TP305 2 Bulk 0.15 0.65 23 2.50TP308 Dist 0.00 0.50 18TP309 2 Bulk 0.50 1.00 19 2.48TP312 Dist 2.20 2.70 22TP314 Dist 0.00 0.50 17TP315 2 Bulk 0.00 0.50 21 2.49TP317 Dist 0.05 0.50 14TP319 2 Bulk 1.50 2.00 12 2.52TP320 Dist 0.00 0.50 14

SYMBOLS : NP : Non Plastic * : Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit Wet Sieved.

4043

Contract No:

SUMMARY OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION TESTS

PSL19/4133Client Ref:

4671

Airfields

Hole Number: Top Depth (m):

Sample Number: Base Depth(m):

Sample Type:

BS Test Percentage 1 1 Soil TotalSieve (mm) Passing 1 1 Fraction Percentage

125 100 1 175 69 1 1 Cobbles 3963 61 1 1 Gravel 40

37.5 57 1 1 Sand 1620 49 1 1 Silt/Clay 510 37 1 16.3 31

3.35 252 21

1.18 180.6 150.3 12

0.212 9 Remarks:0.15 8 See Summary of Soil Descriptions

0.063 5

4043 4671

PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION TESTBS1377 : Part 2 : 1990

Wet Sieve, Clause 9.2

0.00

0.45

Contract No:

TP301

2

Bulk

PSL19/4133Client Ref:Airfields

0.00

2

0.00

6

0.02

0

0.06

3

0.15

0 0.

212

0.30

0

0.60

0

1.18

2.00

3.35

6.3

10.0

20.0

37.5

63

75

125

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

Perc

enta

ge P

assi

ng.

Particle Size (mm).

TP301 0.00

2 0.45

Bulk

Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: Vibro

Particle Density (Mg/m3): 2.55 Material Retained on 37.5 mm Test Sieve (%):

Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3): Material Retained on 20.0 mm Test Sieve (%):

Optimum Moisture Content (%):

Remarks

4043Client Ref

4671

12

Contract

See summary of soil descriptions.

PSL19/4133Airfields

DRY DENSITY / MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP

8.5

43

8

Separate Samples

Non compliance with BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

Hole Number:

Sample Type:

Top Depth (m) :

Sample Number: Base Depth (m) :

1.88

Measured

1.74

1.76

1.78

1.80

1.82

1.84

1.86

1.88

1.90

8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0

Dry

Den

sity

(Mg/

m3)

Moisture Content (%)

Sample

0 % Air voids

5 % Air voids

10 % Air voids

Hole Number: TP301 Top Depth (m): 0.00

Sample Number: 2 Base Depth (m): 0.45

Sample Type: Bulk

Moisture Content: 8.4 Surcharge Kg: 4.20 Sample Top 8.5 Sample Top 71.3Bulk Density Mg/m3: 1.83 Soaking Time hrs 0 Sample Bottom 8.3 Sample Bottom 77.5Dry Density Mg/m3: 1.69 Swelling mm: 0.00

51


4043 4671

CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST Non compliance with BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

C.B.R. Value %Final Moisture Content %

Airfields

Percentage retained on 20mm BS test sieve:

Initial Sample Conditions Sample Preparation

Compaction Conditions 2.5kg

Remarks : See Summary of Soil Descriptions.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Forc

e on

plu

nger

(kN

)

Penetration of Plunger (mm)

Top Bottom



Sample Type:

BS Test Percentage Particle Percentage Soil TotalSieve (mm) Passing Diameter Passing Fraction Percentage

125 100 2 275 100 0.02 6 Cobbles 063 100 2 2 Gravel 0

37.5 100 0.006 3 Sand 8020 100 2 2 Silt 1810 100 0.002 2 Clay 26.3 100

3.35 1002 100

1.18 1000.6 1000.3 100


0.063 20

4043 4671


Wet Sieve & Pipette Analysis, Clause 9.2 & 9.4

1.00

1.50

Contract No:

TP304

2

Bulk


0.00

2

0.00

6

0.02

0

0.06

3

0.15

0 0.

212

0.30

0

0.60

0

1.18

2.00

3.35

6.3

10.0

20.0

37.5

63

75

125

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

Perc

enta

ge P

assi

ng.

Particle Size (mm).

TP304 1.00

2 1.50

Bulk

Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: 2.5kg




Remarks

4043Client Ref

4671

17

Contract


PSL19/4133Airfields


21

0

0

Separate Samples

BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

Hole Number:

Sample Type:

Top Depth (m) :


1.70

Measured

1.60

1.62

1.64

1.66

1.68

1.70

1.72

11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0

Dry

Den

sity

(Mg/

m3)


Sample

0 % Air voids

5 % Air voids

10 % Air voids

TP304 1.00

2 1.50

Bulk





Remarks

4043


21

0

0

Separate Samples

BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

Hole Number:

Sample Type:

Top Depth (m) :


1.77

Measured

Client Ref4671

14

Contract


PSL19/4133Airfields

1.62

1.64

1.66

1.68

1.70

1.72

1.74

1.76

1.78

9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0

Dry

Den

sity

(Mg/

m3)


Sample

0 % Air voids

5 % Air voids

10 % Air voids



Sample Type: Bulk

Moisture Content: 21 Surcharge Kg: 4.20 Sample Top 21 Sample Top 20.8Bulk Density Mg/m3: 1.96 Soaking Time hrs 0 Sample Bottom 21 Sample Bottom 20.1Dry Density Mg/m3: 1.61 Swelling mm: 0.00

0


4043 4671





CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990


Airfields

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Forc

e on

plu

nger

(kN

)


Top Bottom



Sample Type:


125 100 2 275 100 0.02 15 Cobbles 063 100 2 2 Gravel 0

37.5 100 0.006 8 Sand 6720 100 2 2 Silt 2810 100 0.002 5 Clay 56.3 100

3.35 1002 100

1.18 990.6 970.3 93


0.063 33

4043 4671



0.15

0.65

Contract No:

TP305

2

Bulk


0.00

2

0.00

6

0.02

0

0.06

3

0.15

0 0.

212

0.30

0

0.60

0

1.18

2.00

3.35

6.3

10.0

20.0

37.5

63

75

125

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

Perc

enta

ge P

assi

ng.

Particle Size (mm).

TP305 0.15

2 0.65

Bulk





Remarks

4043


23

0

0

Separate Samples

BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

Hole Number:

Sample Type:

Top Depth (m) :


1.75

Measured

Client Ref4671

14

Contract


PSL19/4133Airfields

1.64

1.66

1.68

1.70

1.72

1.74

1.76

10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0

Dry

Den

sity

(Mg/

m3)


Sample

0 % Air voids

5 % Air voids

10 % Air voids

TP305 0.15

2 0.65

Bulk





Remarks

4043


23

0

0

Separate Samples

BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

Hole Number:

Sample Type:

Top Depth (m) :


1.82

Measured

Client Ref4671

12

Contract


PSL19/4133Airfields

1.70

1.72

1.74

1.76

1.78

1.80

1.82

1.84

8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0

Dry

Den

sity

(Mg/

m3)


Sample

0 % Air voids

5 % Air voids

10 % Air voids



Sample Type: Bulk


0


4043 4671







Airfields

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Forc

e on

plu

nger

(kN

)


Top Bottom



Sample Type:


125 100 2 275 100 0.02 10 Cobbles 063 100 2 2 Gravel 1

37.5 100 0.006 4 Sand 7520 100 2 2 Silt 2210 100 0.002 2 Clay 26.3 100

3.35 992 99

1.18 980.6 970.3 95


0.063 24

4043 4671



0.50

1.00

Contract No:

TP309

2

Bulk


0.00

2

0.00

6

0.02

0

0.06

3

0.15

0 0.

212

0.30

0

0.60

0

1.18

2.00

3.35

6.3

10.0

20.0

37.5

63

75

125

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

Perc

enta

ge P

assi

ng.

Particle Size (mm).

TP309 0.50

2 1.00

Bulk





Remarks

4043


19

0

0

Separate Samples

BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

Hole Number:

Sample Type:

Top Depth (m) :


1.73

Measured

Client Ref4671

15

Contract


PSL19/4133Airfields

1.62

1.64

1.66

1.68

1.70

1.72

1.74

10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0

Dry

Den

sity

(Mg/

m3)


Sample

0 % Air voids

5 % Air voids

10 % Air voids

TP309 0.50

2 1.00

Bulk





Remarks

4043Client Ref

4671

13

Contract


PSL19/4133Airfields


19

0

0

Separate Samples

BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

Hole Number:

Sample Type:

Top Depth (m) :


1.79

Measured

1.64

1.66

1.68

1.70

1.72

1.74

1.76

1.78

1.80

8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0

Dry

Den

sity

(Mg/

m3)


Sample

0 % Air voids

5 % Air voids

10 % Air voids



Sample Type: Bulk


0


4043 4671



Airfields





0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Forc

e on

plu

nger

(kN

)


Top Bottom



Sample Type:

BS Test Percentage 1 1 Soil TotalSieve (mm) Passing 1 1 Fraction Percentage

125 100 1 175 100 1 1 Cobbles 063 100 1 1 Gravel 0

37.5 100 1 1 Sand 9220 100 1 1 Silt/Clay 810 100 1 16.3 100

3.35 1002 100

1.18 990.6 990.3 99


0.063 8

4043 4671


Wet Sieve, Clause 9.2

0.00

0.50

Contract No:

TP315

2

Bulk


0.00

2

0.00

6

0.02

0

0.06

3

0.15

0 0.

212

0.30

0

0.60

0

1.18

2.00

3.35

6.3

10.0

20.0

37.5

63

75

125

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

Perc

enta

ge P

assi

ng.

Particle Size (mm).

TP315 0.00

2 0.50

Bulk





Remarks

4043Client Ref

4671

16

Contract


PSL19/4133Airfields


21

0

0

Separate Samples

BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

Hole Number:

Sample Type:

Top Depth (m) :


1.72

Measured

1.60

1.62

1.64

1.66

1.68

1.70

1.72

10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0

Dry

Den

sity

(Mg/

m3)


Sample

0 % Air voids

5 % Air voids

10 % Air voids

TP315 0.00

2 0.50

Bulk





Remarks

4043Client Ref

4671

14

Contract


PSL19/4133Airfields


21

0

0

Separate Samples

BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

Hole Number:

Sample Type:

Top Depth (m) :


1.78

Measured

1.62

1.64

1.66

1.68

1.70

1.72

1.74

1.76

1.78

8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0

Dry

Den

sity

(Mg/

m3)


Sample

0 % Air voids

5 % Air voids

10 % Air voids



Sample Type: Bulk


0


4043 4671







Airfields

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Forc

e on

plu

nger

(kN

)


Top Bottom



Sample Type:


125 100 2 275 100 0.02 8 Cobbles 063 100 2 2 Gravel 1

37.5 100 0.006 3 Sand 7920 100 2 2 Silt 1810 100 0.002 2 Clay 26.3 100

3.35 1002 99

1.18 990.6 980.3 98


0.063 20

4043 4671



1.50

2.00

Contract No:

TP319

2

Bulk


0.00

2

0.00

6

0.02

0

0.06

3

0.15

0 0.

212

0.30

0

0.60

0

1.18

2.00

3.35

6.3

10.0

20.0

37.5

63

75

125

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

Perc

enta

ge P

assi

ng.

Particle Size (mm).

TP319 1.50

2 2.00

Bulk





Remarks

4043


12

0

0

Separate Samples

BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

Hole Number:

Sample Type:

Top Depth (m) :


1.73

Measured

Client Ref4671

16

Contract


PSL19/4133Airfields

1.62

1.64

1.66

1.68

1.70

1.72

1.74

11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0

Dry

Den

sity

(Mg/

m3)


Sample

0 % Air voids

5 % Air voids

10 % Air voids

TP319 1.50

2 2.00

Bulk





Remarks

4043


12

0

0

Separate Samples

BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

Hole Number:

Sample Type:

Top Depth (m) :


1.80

Measured

Client Ref4671

14

Contract


PSL19/4133Airfields

1.64

1.66

1.68

1.70

1.72

1.74

1.76

1.78

1.80

9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0

Dry

Den

sity

(Mg/

m3)


Sample

0 % Air voids

5 % Air voids

10 % Air voids



Sample Type: Bulk


0


4043 4671







Airfields

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Forc

e on

plu

nger

(kN

)


Top Bottom

Certificate Number 22-Jul-19Client

Our Reference

Client Reference

Order No

Contract Title

Description

Date Received

Date Started

Date Completed

Test Procedures

Notes

Approved By

Adam Fenwick

Opinions and interpretations are outside the laboratory's scope of ISO 17025

accreditation. This certificate is issued in accordance with the accreditation

requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. The results reported herein

relate only to the material supplied to the laboratory. This certificate shall not be

reproduced except in full, without the prior written approval of the laboratory.

Contracts Manager

Airfields

7 Soil samples.

12-Jul-19

12-Jul-19

22-Jul-19

Identified by prefix DETSn (details on request).

Certificate of Analysis

19-13219

Professional Soils Laboratory Ltd

5/7 Hexthorpe Road

Hexthorpe

DN4 0AR

19-13219

PSL19/4133

(not supplied)

Derwentside Environmental Testing Services LimitedUnit 2, Park Road Industrial Estate South, Consett, Co Durham, DH8 5PY

Tel: 01207 582333 • email: [email protected] • www.dets.co.uk Page 1 of 4 .

Summary of Chemical Analysis

Soil SamplesOur Ref 19-13219

Client Ref PSL19/4133

Contract Title Airfields

Lab No 1530766 1530767 1530768 1530769 1530770 1530771

Sample ID TP301 TP304 TP305 TP309 TP312 TP315

Depth 0.00-0.45 1.00-1.50 0.15-0.65 0.50-1.00 2.20-2.70 0.00-0.50

Other ID

Sample Type SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

Sampling Date n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s

Sampling Time n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s

Test Method LOD Units

DETSC 2008# 9.8 8.7 8.2 8.9 8.8 9.1

DETSC 2055 1 mg/l 12 11 13 10 9.5 21

DETSC 2076# 10 mg/l 190 29 20 28 22 13

DETSC 2320 0.01 % 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 < 0.01

pH

Chloride Aqueous Extract

Sulphate Aqueous Extract as SO4

Sulphur as S, Total

Inorganics

Page 2 of 4Key: # -MCERTS (accreditation only applies if report carries the MCERTS logo). n/s -not supplied.



Client Ref PSL19/4133


Lab No

Sample ID

Depth

Other ID

Sample Type

Sampling Date

Sampling Time


DETSC 2008#

DETSC 2055 1 mg/l

DETSC 2076# 10 mg/l

DETSC 2320 0.01 %

pH

Chloride Aqueous Extract


Sulphur as S, Total

Inorganics

1530772

TP319

1.50-2.00

SOIL

n/s

n/s

8.8

8.8

< 10

< 0.01

Page 3 of 4Key: # -MCERTS (accreditation only applies if report carries the MCERTS logo). n/s -not supplied.

Information in Support of the Analytical ResultsOur Ref 19-13219

Client Ref PSL19/4133Contract Airfields

Containers Received & Deviating Samples

Lab No Sample ID

Date

Sampled Containers Received Holding time exceeded for tests

Inappropriate

container for

tests1530766 TP301 0.00-0.45 SOIL PT 1L Sample date not supplied, Anions 2:1 (365 days),

Total Sulphur ICP (365 days), Metals ICP Prep (365

days), pH + Conductivity (7 days)

1530767 TP304 1.00-1.50 SOIL PT 1L Sample date not supplied, Anions 2:1 (365 days),


days), pH + Conductivity (7 days)1530768 TP305 0.15-0.65 SOIL PT 1L Sample date not supplied, Anions 2:1 (365 days),








days), pH + Conductivity (7 days)1530771 TP315 0.00-0.50 SOIL PT 1L Sample date not supplied, Anions 2:1 (365 days),






Soil Analysis NotesInorganic soil analysis was carried out on a dried sample, crushed to pass a 425µm sieve, in accordance with BS1377.

Organic soil analysis was carried out on an 'as received' sample. Organics results are corrected for moisture and expressed on a dry weight basis.

The Loss on Drying, used to express organics analysis on an air dried basis, is carried out at a temperature of 28°C +/-2°C.

DisposalFrom the issue date of this test certificate, samples will be held for the following times prior to disposal :-

Soils - 1 month, Liquids - 2 weeks, Asbestos (test portion) - 6 months

Key: P-Plastic T-Tub

DETS cannot be held responsible for the integrity of samples received whereby the laboratory did not undertake the sampling. In this instance samples received may

be deviating. Deviating Sample criteria are based on British and International standards and laboratory trials in conjunction with the UKAS note 'Guidance on

Deviating Samples'. All samples received are listed above. However, those samples that have additional comments in relation to hold time, inappropriate containers

etc are deviating due to the reasons stated. This means that the analysis is accredited where applicable, but results may be compromised due to sample deviations. If

no sampled date (soils) or date+time (waters) has been supplied then samples are deviating. However, if you are able to supply a sampled date (and time for waters)

this will prevent samples being reported as deviating where specific hold times are not exceeded and where the container supplied is suitable.

Page 4 of 4



Appendix G Chemical Testing Resultsand HazWaste Classification



STATISTICAL ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS

The results of the chemical analysis have been assessed in accordance with CL:AIRE (ContaminatedLand: Applications in Real Environments) ‘Guidance on Comparing Soil Contamination Data with aCritical Concentration’ published by the CIEH, May 2008.

This guidance provides a statistical approach to objectively evaluate the evidence for and againstparticular propositions/hypothesis and has the useful attribute of enabling decision makers to reachconclusions about the available evidence, with at least some understanding of the validity of theresults.

The guidance approaches this in the context of assessing the results from two different perspectives,the Planning Scenario and Part 2A.

When assessing in terms of the Planning Scenario, the key question would be ‘can we confidentlysay that the level of contamination on this land is low relative to some appropriate measure of risk?’Under Part 2A, the question would be ‘can we confidently say that the level of contamination is highrelative to some appropriate measure of risk?’

These questions are addressed through the use of formal hypothesis – the “Null Hypothesis” and the“Alternative Hypothesis”.

This assessment will be carried out in accordance with the Planning Scenario, where the aim is todemonstrate ‘suitability for use’. The Null Hypothesis is that the level of contamination is the same as,or higher than the critical concentration/GAC. The Alternative Hypothesis is that the level ofcontamination is lower than the critical concentration/GAC. Under Part 2A the opposite set ofpropositions are applicable.

By convention, the Null Hypothesis is the starting proposition against which the key question, asexpressed by the Alternative Hypothesis, can be tested.

The assessment of the results relies on there being a normal distribution of results for a particularcontaminant and that the data set under consideration is representative of the particular materialwhich is being assessed. If more than one dataset is present, then the hypothesis should be appliedindividually for each data set.

Under the Planning Scenario, the statistical test is used to demonstrate that there is a 95% probabilitythat the true population mean falls below the critical concentration/GAC.

Appropriate data sets must be created to enable the statistical testing to be carried out and threekey elements must be considered prior to statistical analysis. These are as follows:

Dealing with non-detects; Understanding the statistical distribution of data; and Dealing with outliers.

The results can then be assessed, and the results will be compared against the following:

Sample Mean – if the sample mean of the data set is in excess of the GAC then the UpperConfidence Limit of the true population mean will be higher than the critical concentration.

95% of the Upper Confidence Limit. One Sample T Test (parametric test) carried out at the 95% confidence level.

On the basis of these tests, the validity of the Null Hypothesis can be assessed.

Certificate Number 16-Jul-19Client

Our Reference

Client Reference

Order No

Contract Title

Description

Date Received

Date Started

Date Completed

Test Procedures

Notes

Approved By

Adam Fenwick






Contracts Manager

Airfields

17 Soil samples, 4 Leachate samples.

10-Jul-19

10-Jul-19

16-Jul-19



19-13052

JPG (Leeds) LTD

Civil & Structural Engineers

5 John Charles Way

Leeds

LS12 6QA

19-13052

4671

(not supplied)





Client Ref 4671


Lab No 1529398 1529399 1529400 1529401 1529402 1529403


Depth 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.20 0.00-0.20 0.50-1.00 0.00-0.25 0.00-0.15

Other ID


Sampling Date 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19



DETSC 2301# 0.2 mg/kg 5.7 11 11 13 9.9

DETSC 2301# 0.1 mg/kg 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5

DETSC 2301# 0.15 mg/kg 9.6 17 15 19 15

DETSC 2204* 1 mg/kg < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

DETSC 2301# 0.2 mg/kg 11 13 12 13 13

DETSC 2301# 0.3 mg/kg 250 91 80 100 78

DETSC 2325# 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 0.06 0.06 < 0.05 < 0.05

DETSC 2301# 1 mg/kg 7.2 15 10 18 12

DETSC 2301# 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

DETSC 2301# 1 mg/kg 64 130 140 110 140

DETSC 2008# 10.9 7.8 8.1 8.6 8.1 7.4

DETSC 2130# 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1

DETSC 2002# 0.1 % 0.4 3.6 5.7 2.0 6.2

DETSC 2055 1 mg/kg 29.0 3.6 16.9 7.8 14.2

DETSC 2076# 10 mg/l 95 20 23 16 14 31

DETSC 2024* 10 mg/kg < 10 < 10 < 10 16 < 10

DETSC 2321# 100 mg/kg 1550 362 738 252 823

DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg < 0.01

DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg < 0.01

DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg < 0.01

DETSC 3072# 1.5 mg/kg < 1.5

DETSC 3072# 1.2 mg/kg < 1.2

DETSC 3072# 1.5 mg/kg < 1.5

DETSC 3072# 3.4 mg/kg < 3.4

DETSC 3072* 10 mg/kg < 10

DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg < 0.01

DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg < 0.01

DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg < 0.01

DETSC 3072# 0.9 mg/kg < 0.9

DETSC 3072# 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5

DETSC 3072# 0.6 mg/kg < 0.6

DETSC 3072# 1.4 mg/kg < 1.4

DETSC 3072* 10 mg/kg < 10

DETSC 3072* 10 mg/kg < 10

DETSC 3311# 10 mg/kg < 10

DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

Metals

Inorganics

Petroleum Hydrocarbons

PAHs

Aromatic C16-C21

Aromatic C21-C35

Aromatic C5-C35

TPH Ali/Aro Total

EPH (C10-C40)

Naphthalene

Aliphatic C5-C35

Aromatic C5-C7

Aromatic C7-C8

Aromatic C8-C10

Aromatic C10-C12

Aromatic C12-C16

Aliphatic C6-C8

Aliphatic C8-C10

Aliphatic C10-C12

Aliphatic C12-C16

Aliphatic C16-C21

Aliphatic C21-C35

Organic matter

Chloride


Sulphide

Sulphate as SO4, Total

Aliphatic C5-C6

Mercury

Nickel

Selenium

Zinc

pH

Cyanide, Free

Arsenic

Cadmium

Chromium

Chromium, Hexavalent

Copper

Lead

Page 2 of 10Key: * -not accredited. # -MCERTS (accreditation only applies if report carries the MCERTS logo). n/s -not supplied.



Client Ref 4671


Lab No 1529398 1529399 1529400 1529401 1529402 1529403


Depth 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.20 0.00-0.20 0.50-1.00 0.00-0.25 0.00-0.15

Other ID


Sampling Date 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19



DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.07 0.31 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.11

DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg 0.03 0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.03

DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.31 0.70 0.03 0.03 0.20

DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.38 0.54 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.18

DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.26 0.34 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.09

DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg 0.31 0.32 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.08

DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.56 0.36 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.11

DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.21 0.11 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.04

DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.46 0.23 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.10

DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.25 0.10 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.06

DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.07 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.33 0.10 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.06

DETSC 3303 0.1 mg/kg 3.3 3.2 < 0.10 < 0.10 1.1

DETSC 2130# 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3

Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

PAH - USEPA 16, Total

Phenol - Monohydric

Phenols

Pyrene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Chrysene

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Acenaphthylene

Acenaphthene

Fluorene

Phenanthrene

Anthracene

Fluoranthene




Client Ref 4671


Lab No

Sample ID

Depth

Other ID

Sample Type

Sampling Date

Sampling Time


DETSC 2301# 0.2 mg/kg



DETSC 2204* 1 mg/kg




DETSC 2301# 1 mg/kg


DETSC 2301# 1 mg/kg

DETSC 2008#


DETSC 2002# 0.1 %

DETSC 2055 1 mg/kg

DETSC 2076# 10 mg/l

DETSC 2024* 10 mg/kg

DETSC 2321# 100 mg/kg

DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg



















Metals

Inorganics


PAHs

Aromatic C16-C21

Aromatic C21-C35

Aromatic C5-C35

TPH Ali/Aro Total

EPH (C10-C40)

Naphthalene

Aliphatic C5-C35

Aromatic C5-C7

Aromatic C7-C8

Aromatic C8-C10

Aromatic C10-C12

Aromatic C12-C16

Aliphatic C6-C8

Aliphatic C8-C10

Aliphatic C10-C12

Aliphatic C12-C16

Aliphatic C16-C21

Aliphatic C21-C35

Organic matter

Chloride


Sulphide


Aliphatic C5-C6

Mercury

Nickel

Selenium

Zinc

pH

Cyanide, Free

Arsenic

Cadmium

Chromium


Copper

Lead

1529404 1529405 1529406 1529407 1529408 1529409

TP306 TP308 TP310 TP311 TP312 TP313

0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.50-1.00 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50

SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

03/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19 04/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19

n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s

6.4 6.5 5.1 4.4 4.4 5.4

0.3 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

10 14 8.0 8.8 6.5 9.2

< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

7.2 6.9 3.9 5.9 4.4 4.6

45 34 16 19 14 26

< 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

9.3 13 6.8 7.7 5.9 8.9

< 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

64 50 29 31 27 33

9.9 8.5 8.9 8.8 8.8 8.6

< 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

1.3 1.0 0.6 < 0.1 0.7 0.3

9.0 6.3 5.2 5.4 8.2 4.4

56 22 11 < 10 11 11

12 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10

265 140 < 100 200 300 300

< 10

< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03




Client Ref 4671


Lab No

Sample ID

Depth

Other ID

Sample Type

Sampling Date

Sampling Time




DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg



















Phenol - Monohydric

Phenols

Pyrene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Chrysene



Benzo(a)pyrene

Acenaphthylene

Acenaphthene

Fluorene

Phenanthrene

Anthracene

Fluoranthene

1529404 1529405 1529406 1529407 1529408 1529409

TP306 TP308 TP310 TP311 TP312 TP313

0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.50-1.00 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50

SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

03/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19 04/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19

n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s

< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

0.12 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.08 < 0.03

0.06 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

0.23 0.06 0.04 < 0.03 0.15 < 0.03

0.20 0.06 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.13 < 0.03

0.10 0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.07 < 0.03

0.08 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.06 < 0.03

0.10 0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.09 < 0.03

0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.03 < 0.03

0.07 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.08 < 0.03

0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.04 < 0.03

< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.04 < 0.03

1.1 0.19 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.78 < 0.10

< 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3




Client Ref 4671


Lab No

Sample ID

Depth

Other ID

Sample Type

Sampling Date

Sampling Time





DETSC 2204* 1 mg/kg




DETSC 2301# 1 mg/kg


DETSC 2301# 1 mg/kg

DETSC 2008#


DETSC 2002# 0.1 %

DETSC 2055 1 mg/kg

DETSC 2076# 10 mg/l






















Metals

Inorganics


PAHs

Aromatic C16-C21

Aromatic C21-C35

Aromatic C5-C35

TPH Ali/Aro Total

EPH (C10-C40)

Naphthalene

Aliphatic C5-C35

Aromatic C5-C7

Aromatic C7-C8

Aromatic C8-C10

Aromatic C10-C12

Aromatic C12-C16

Aliphatic C6-C8

Aliphatic C8-C10

Aliphatic C10-C12

Aliphatic C12-C16

Aliphatic C16-C21

Aliphatic C21-C35

Organic matter

Chloride


Sulphide


Aliphatic C5-C6

Mercury

Nickel

Selenium

Zinc

pH

Cyanide, Free

Arsenic

Cadmium

Chromium


Copper

Lead

1529410 1529411 1529412 1529413 1529414

TP316 TP317 TP318 TP319 TP320

0.00-0.10 0.05-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50

SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19

n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s

13 9.4 4.7 6.8 5.4

0.6 0.2 < 0.1 0.2 0.2

21 14 9.5 9.9 10

< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

18 9.1 5.0 7.8 7.2

120 70 21 40 23

0.06 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

17 14 8.9 9.9 8.8

< 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

180 69 35 54 90

7.0 7.9 8.5 8.4 8.5

0.3 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

4.2 0.7 0.5 1.5 1.2

11.7 3.6 8.6 4.5 5.7

20 13 < 10 15 10

< 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10

308 142 < 100 160 < 100

< 10 < 10 < 10

< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03




Client Ref 4671


Lab No

Sample ID

Depth

Other ID

Sample Type

Sampling Date

Sampling Time























Phenol - Monohydric

Phenols

Pyrene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Chrysene



Benzo(a)pyrene

Acenaphthylene

Acenaphthene

Fluorene

Phenanthrene

Anthracene

Fluoranthene

1529410 1529411 1529412 1529413 1529414

TP316 TP317 TP318 TP319 TP320

0.00-0.10 0.05-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50

SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19

n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s

< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

0.05 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.03 0.14

< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.03

0.13 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.08 0.25

0.12 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.06 0.23

0.05 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.05 0.12

0.07 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.03 0.11

0.09 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.05 0.15

0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.06

0.05 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.11

0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.07

< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.07

0.66 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.29 1.3

< 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3



Leachate SamplesOur Ref 19-13052

Client Ref 4671


Lab No 1529415 1529416 1529417 1529418

Sample ID TP302 TP304 TP308 TP318

Depth 0.00-0.20 0.00-0.25 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50

Other ID

Sample Type LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE

Sampling Date 03/07/19 04/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19

Sampling Time n/s n/s n/s n/s


DETSC 1009* Y Y Y Y

DETSC 2306 0.16 ug/l 0.52 0.32 1.1 0.74

DETSC 2306 0.03 ug/l < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

DETSC 2306 0.25 ug/l 9.9 0.29 < 0.25 0.32

DETSC 2203 0.007 mg/l < 0.007 < 0.007 < 0.007 < 0.007

DETSC 2306 0.4 ug/l 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.1

DETSC 2306 0.09 ug/l 5.3 0.45 0.42 0.71

DETSC 2306 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 2306 0.5 ug/l < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

DETSC 2306 0.25 ug/l < 0.25 0.92 0.47 < 0.25

DETSC 2306 1.3 ug/l 1.5 2.8 < 1.3 < 1.3

DETSC 2008 7.1 7.1 7.5 7.7

DETSC 2130 20 ug/l < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20

DETSC 2055 0.1 mg/l 4.0 1.5 3.1 1.6

DETSC 3304 0.05 ug/l < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.2 ug/l < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20

DETSC 2130 100 ug/l < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100

PAH Total

Phenol - Monohydric

Preparation

Metals

Inorganics

PAHs

Phenols



Benzo(a)pyrene




Phenanthrene

Anthracene

Fluoranthene

Pyrene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Chrysene

Cyanide, Free

Sulphate as SO4

Naphthalene

Acenaphthylene

Acenaphthene

Fluorene

Lead, Dissolved

Mercury, Dissolved

Nickel, Dissolved

Selenium, Dissolved

Zinc, Dissolved

pH

NRA Leachate Preparation

Arsenic, Dissolved

Cadmium, Dissolved

Chromium, Dissolved


Copper, Dissolved

Page 8 of 10Key: * -not accredited. n/s -not supplied.

Summary of Asbestos Analysis


Client Ref 4671


Lab No Sample ID Material Type Result Comment* Analyst1529398 TP301 0.00-0.50 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick

1529399 TP302 0.00-0.20 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick















Crocidolite = Blue Asbestos, Amosite = Brown Asbestos, Chrysotile = White Asbestos. Anthophyllite, Actinolite and Tremolite are other forms of Asbestos.

Samples are analysed by DETSC 1101 using polarised light microscopy in accordance with HSG248 and documented in-house methods. NAD = No Asbestos

Detected. Where a sample is NAD, the result is based on analysis of at least 2 sub-samples and should be taken to mean 'no asbestos detected in sample'. Key: * -

not included in laboratory scope of accreditation.

Page 9 of 10

Information in Support of the Analytical ResultsOur Ref 19-13052

Client Ref 4671Contract Airfields


Lab No Sample ID

Date

Sampled Containers Received

Holding time

exceeded for

tests

Inappropriate

container for

tests1529398 TP301 0.00-0.50 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L

1529399 TP302 0.00-0.20 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L


1529401 TP303 0.50-1.00 SOIL 03/07/19 PT 1L














1529415 TP302 0.00-0.20 LEACHATE 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L




Soil Analysis NotesInorganic soil analysis was carried out on a dried sample, crushed to pass a 425µm sieve, in accordance with BS1377.

Organic soil analysis was carried out on an 'as received' sample. Organics results are corrected for moisture and expressed on a dry weight basis.

The Loss on Drying, used to express organics analysis on an air dried basis, is carried out at a temperature of 28°C +/-2°C.



Key: G-Glass P-Plastic J-Jar T-Tub







Page 10 of 10

Certificate Number 21-Aug-19Client

Our Reference

Client Reference

Order No

Contract Title

Description

Date Received

Date Started

Date Completed

Test Procedures

Notes

Approved By

Adam Fenwick






Contracts Manager


The Airfields, Deeside

3 Water samples.

01-Aug-19

01-Aug-19

21-Aug-19

This report supersedes 19-14617-2, amendments.


19-14617-3

JPG (Leeds) LTD

Civil & Structural Engineers

5 John Charles Way

Leeds

LS12 6QA

19-14617-3

4671

(not supplied)




Water SamplesOur Ref 19-14617-3

Client Ref 4671

Contract Title The Airfields, Deeside

Lab No 1540234 1540235 1540236

Sample ID BH301 BH304 BH308

Depth

Other ID

Sample Type WATER WATER WATER

Sampling Date 30/07/19 30/07/19 30/07/19

Sampling Time n/s n/s n/s


DETSC 2306 0.16 ug/l 5.3 1.4 0.67

DETSC 2306 0.03 ug/l < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03

DETSC 2306 0.25 ug/l < 0.25 < 0.25 0.40

DETSC 2306 0.4 ug/l < 0.4 1.7 1.4

DETSC 2306 0.09 ug/l 0.32 0.31 0.15

DETSC 2306 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 2306 0.5 ug/l 1.9 3.3 0.8

DETSC 2306 0.25 ug/l < 0.25 0.48 0.73

DETSC 2306 1.3 ug/l 3.8 7.4 2.6

DETSC 2008 pH 7.1 7.4 7.6

DETSC 2130 20 ug/l < 20 < 20 < 20

DETSC 2055 0.1 mg/l 33 15 24

DETSC 3304 0.05 ug/l < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

DETSC 3304 0.2 ug/l < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20

DETSC 3451* 0.5 ug/l < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50

Metals

Inorganics

PAHs

Phenols




PAH Total

Phenol

Pyrene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Chrysene



Benzo(a)pyrene

Acenaphthylene

Acenaphthene

Fluorene

Phenanthrene

Anthracene

Fluoranthene

Sulphate as SO4

Naphthalene

Selenium, Dissolved

Zinc, Dissolved

pH

Cyanide, Free

Copper, Dissolved

Lead, Dissolved

Mercury, Dissolved

Nickel, Dissolved

Arsenic, Dissolved

Cadmium, Dissolved

Chromium, Dissolved

Page 2 of 3Key: * -not accredited. n/s -not supplied.

Information in Support of the Analytical ResultsOur Ref 19-14617-3

Client Ref 4671Contract The Airfields, Deeside


Lab No Sample ID

Date

Sampled Containers Received Holding time exceeded for tests

Inappropriate

container for

tests1540234 BH301 WATER 30/07/19 GB 1L, GV, PB 1L pH/Cond/TDS (1 days)

1540235 BH304 WATER 30/07/19 GB 1L, GV, PB 1L pH/Cond/TDS (1 days)

1540236 BH308 WATER 30/07/19 GB 1L, GV, PB 1L pH/Cond/TDS (1 days)



Key: G-Glass P-Plastic B-Bottle V-Vial







Page 3 of 3

www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 1 of 38

Waste Classification Report

N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V

Job name

4671 The Airfields Deeside H6&H7

Description/Comments

4671 The Airfields Deeside H6&H7

Project

4671

Site

The Airfields Deeside H6&H7

Related Documents# Name Description

None

Waste Stream Template

JPG WASTE STREAM V20

Classified by

Name:Dominic HorneDate:23 Jul 2019 13:30 GMTTelephone:07814008742

Company:JPG Leeds5 John Charles WayLeedsLS12 6QA

Report

Created by: Dominic HorneCreated date: 23 Jul 2019 13:30 GMT

Job summary# Sample Name Depth [m] Classification Result Hazard properties Page1 TP301 Non Hazardous 3

2 TP302 Non Hazardous 5


4 TP303[2] Non Hazardous 9








Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019

Page 2 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com

# Sample Name Depth [m] Classification Result Hazard properties Page12 TP313 Non Hazardous 24






Appendices PageAppendix A: Classifier defined and non CLP determinands 36Appendix B: Rationale for selection of metal species 37Appendix C: Version 38



Classification of sample: TP301

Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04

in the List of Waste

Sample details

Sample Name:TP301

LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil

from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05

03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands

Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)

#Determinand

CLP

Not

e

User entered dataConv.Factor

Compound conc.Classification

value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed

CLP index number EC Number CAS Number

1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }

5.7 mg/kg 1.32 7.526 mg/kg 0.000753 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3

2cadmium { cadmium oxide }

0.3 mg/kg 1.142 0.343 mg/kg 0.0000343 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0

3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 9.6 mg/kg 1.462 14.031 mg/kg 0.0014 %

215-160-9 1308-38-9

4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD

024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0

5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }

11 mg/kg 1.126 12.385 mg/kg 0.00124 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1

6lead { lead chromate }

1 250 mg/kg 1.56 389.954 mg/kg 0.025 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6

7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5

8nickel { nickel chromate }

7.2 mg/kg 2.976 21.429 mg/kg 0.00214 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9

selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD

034-002-00-8

10zinc { zinc chromate }

64 mg/kg 2.774 177.545 mg/kg 0.0178 %024-007-00-3

11TPH (C6 to C40) petroleum group

<10 mg/kg <10 mg/kg <0.001 % <LOD TPH

12pH

10.9 pH 10.9 pH 10.9 pH PH

13

cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }

<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

15acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

16acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

17fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

18phenanthrene

0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

19anthracene

0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

20fluoranthene

0.31 mg/kg 0.31 mg/kg 0.000031 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

21pyrene

0.38 mg/kg 0.38 mg/kg 0.000038 % 204-927-3 129-00-0

22benzo[a]anthracene

0.26 mg/kg 0.26 mg/kg 0.000026 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

23chrysene

0.31 mg/kg 0.31 mg/kg 0.000031 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9

24benzo[b]fluoranthene

0.56 mg/kg 0.56 mg/kg 0.000056 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2

25benzo[k]fluoranthene

0.21 mg/kg 0.21 mg/kg 0.000021 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9

26benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene

0.46 mg/kg 0.46 mg/kg 0.000046 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8

27indeno[123-cd]pyrene

0.25 mg/kg 0.25 mg/kg 0.000025 % 205-893-2 193-39-5

28dibenz[a,h]anthracene

0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 %601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3

29benzo[ghi]perylene

0.33 mg/kg 0.33 mg/kg 0.000033 % 205-883-8 191-24-2

30phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.05 %

KeyUser supplied data

Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason

Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)

Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration

<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification






Sample details

Sample Name:TP302



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



11 mg/kg 1.32 14.524 mg/kg 0.00145 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.4 mg/kg 1.142 0.457 mg/kg 0.0000457 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0

3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 17 mg/kg 1.462 24.846 mg/kg 0.00248 %

215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


13 mg/kg 1.126 14.637 mg/kg 0.00146 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 91 mg/kg 1.56 141.943 mg/kg 0.0091 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6

7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } 0.06 mg/kg 1.16 0.0696 mg/kg 0.00000696 % 215-696-3 1344-48-5


15 mg/kg 2.976 44.644 mg/kg 0.00446 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


130 mg/kg 2.774 360.639 mg/kg 0.0361 %024-007-00-3

11pH

7.8 pH 7.8 pH 7.8 pH PH

12


0.1 mg/kg 1.884 0.188 mg/kg 0.0000188 %

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

0.31 mg/kg 0.31 mg/kg 0.000031 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

0.7 mg/kg 0.7 mg/kg 0.00007 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

0.54 mg/kg 0.54 mg/kg 0.000054 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.34 mg/kg 0.34 mg/kg 0.000034 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

0.32 mg/kg 0.32 mg/kg 0.000032 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.36 mg/kg 0.36 mg/kg 0.000036 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.11 mg/kg 0.11 mg/kg 0.000011 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.23 mg/kg 0.23 mg/kg 0.000023 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg/kg 0.00001 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 %601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg/kg 0.00001 % 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0558 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP303



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



11 mg/kg 1.32 14.524 mg/kg 0.00145 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.5 mg/kg 1.142 0.571 mg/kg 0.0000571 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


12 mg/kg 1.126 13.511 mg/kg 0.00135 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 80 mg/kg 1.56 124.785 mg/kg 0.008 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



10 mg/kg 2.976 29.763 mg/kg 0.00298 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


140 mg/kg 2.774 388.381 mg/kg 0.0388 %024-007-00-3

11pH

8.1 pH 8.1 pH 8.1 pH PH

12


0.2 mg/kg 1.884 0.377 mg/kg 0.0000377 %

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0553 %








Classification of sample: TP303[2]



Sample details

Sample Name:TP303[2]



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

8.6 pH 8.6 pH 8.6 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details

Sample Name:TP304



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



13 mg/kg 1.32 17.164 mg/kg 0.00172 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.4 mg/kg 1.142 0.457 mg/kg 0.0000457 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


13 mg/kg 1.126 14.637 mg/kg 0.00146 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 100 mg/kg 1.56 155.982 mg/kg 0.01 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



18 mg/kg 2.976 53.573 mg/kg 0.00536 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


110 mg/kg 2.774 305.156 mg/kg 0.0305 %024-007-00-3

11pH

8.1 pH 8.1 pH 8.1 pH PH

12


<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0523 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP305



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



9.9 mg/kg 1.32 13.071 mg/kg 0.00131 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.5 mg/kg 1.142 0.571 mg/kg 0.0000571 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


13 mg/kg 1.126 14.637 mg/kg 0.00146 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 78 mg/kg 1.56 121.666 mg/kg 0.0078 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



12 mg/kg 2.976 35.715 mg/kg 0.00357 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


140 mg/kg 2.774 388.381 mg/kg 0.0388 %024-007-00-3

11pH

7.4 pH 7.4 pH 7.4 pH PH

12


<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

0.11 mg/kg 0.11 mg/kg 0.000011 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

0.2 mg/kg 0.2 mg/kg 0.00002 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

0.18 mg/kg 0.18 mg/kg 0.000018 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.09 mg/kg 0.09 mg/kg 0.000009 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

0.08 mg/kg 0.08 mg/kg 0.000008 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.11 mg/kg 0.11 mg/kg 0.000011 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg/kg 0.00001 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 % 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0557 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP306



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



6.4 mg/kg 1.32 8.45 mg/kg 0.000845 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.3 mg/kg 1.142 0.343 mg/kg 0.0000343 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


7.2 mg/kg 1.126 8.106 mg/kg 0.000811 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 45 mg/kg 1.56 70.192 mg/kg 0.0045 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



9.3 mg/kg 2.976 27.679 mg/kg 0.00277 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


64 mg/kg 2.774 177.545 mg/kg 0.0178 %024-007-00-3

11pH

9.9 pH 9.9 pH 9.9 pH PH

12


<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

0.12 mg/kg 0.12 mg/kg 0.000012 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

0.23 mg/kg 0.23 mg/kg 0.000023 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

0.2 mg/kg 0.2 mg/kg 0.00002 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg/kg 0.00001 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

0.08 mg/kg 0.08 mg/kg 0.000008 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg/kg 0.00001 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 % 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0287 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP308



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



6.5 mg/kg 1.32 8.582 mg/kg 0.000858 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.1 mg/kg 1.142 0.114 mg/kg 0.0000114 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


6.9 mg/kg 1.126 7.769 mg/kg 0.000777 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 34 mg/kg 1.56 53.034 mg/kg 0.0034 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



13 mg/kg 2.976 38.691 mg/kg 0.00387 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


50 mg/kg 2.774 138.707 mg/kg 0.0139 %024-007-00-3

11pH

8.5 pH 8.5 pH 8.5 pH PH

12


<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0253 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP310



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



5.1 mg/kg 1.32 6.734 mg/kg 0.000673 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


3.9 mg/kg 1.126 4.391 mg/kg 0.000439 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 16 mg/kg 1.56 24.957 mg/kg 0.0016 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



6.8 mg/kg 2.976 20.239 mg/kg 0.00202 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


29 mg/kg 2.774 80.45 mg/kg 0.00805 %024-007-00-3

11pH

8.9 pH 8.9 pH 8.9 pH PH

12


<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0144 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP311



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



4.4 mg/kg 1.32 5.809 mg/kg 0.000581 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


5.9 mg/kg 1.126 6.643 mg/kg 0.000664 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 19 mg/kg 1.56 29.636 mg/kg 0.0019 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



7.7 mg/kg 2.976 22.917 mg/kg 0.00229 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


31 mg/kg 2.774 85.999 mg/kg 0.0086 %024-007-00-3

11pH

8.8 pH 8.8 pH 8.8 pH PH

12


<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0158 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP312



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



4.4 mg/kg 1.32 5.809 mg/kg 0.000581 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


4.4 mg/kg 1.126 4.954 mg/kg 0.000495 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 14 mg/kg 1.56 21.837 mg/kg 0.0014 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



5.9 mg/kg 2.976 17.56 mg/kg 0.00176 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


27 mg/kg 2.774 74.902 mg/kg 0.00749 %024-007-00-3

11pH

8.8 pH 8.8 pH 8.8 pH PH

12


<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

0.08 mg/kg 0.08 mg/kg 0.000008 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

0.15 mg/kg 0.15 mg/kg 0.000015 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

0.13 mg/kg 0.13 mg/kg 0.000013 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.09 mg/kg 0.09 mg/kg 0.000009 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.08 mg/kg 0.08 mg/kg 0.000008 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 % 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0132 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP313



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



5.4 mg/kg 1.32 7.13 mg/kg 0.000713 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


4.6 mg/kg 1.126 5.179 mg/kg 0.000518 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 26 mg/kg 1.56 40.555 mg/kg 0.0026 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



8.9 mg/kg 2.976 26.489 mg/kg 0.00265 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


33 mg/kg 2.774 91.547 mg/kg 0.00915 %024-007-00-3

11pH

8.6 pH 8.6 pH 8.6 pH PH

12


<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0174 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP316



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



13 mg/kg 1.32 17.164 mg/kg 0.00172 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.6 mg/kg 1.142 0.685 mg/kg 0.0000685 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


18 mg/kg 1.126 20.266 mg/kg 0.00203 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 120 mg/kg 1.56 187.178 mg/kg 0.012 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



17 mg/kg 2.976 50.597 mg/kg 0.00506 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


180 mg/kg 2.774 499.346 mg/kg 0.0499 %024-007-00-3

11pH

7 pH 7 pH 7pH PH

12


0.3 mg/kg 1.884 0.565 mg/kg 0.0000565 %

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

0.05 mg/kg 0.05 mg/kg 0.000005 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

0.13 mg/kg 0.13 mg/kg 0.000013 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

0.12 mg/kg 0.12 mg/kg 0.000012 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.05 mg/kg 0.05 mg/kg 0.000005 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.09 mg/kg 0.09 mg/kg 0.000009 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.05 mg/kg 0.05 mg/kg 0.000005 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0744 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP317



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



9.4 mg/kg 1.32 12.411 mg/kg 0.00124 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.2 mg/kg 1.142 0.228 mg/kg 0.0000228 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


9.1 mg/kg 1.126 10.246 mg/kg 0.00102 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 70 mg/kg 1.56 109.187 mg/kg 0.007 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



14 mg/kg 2.976 41.668 mg/kg 0.00417 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


69 mg/kg 2.774 191.416 mg/kg 0.0191 %024-007-00-3

11pH

7.9 pH 7.9 pH 7.9 pH PH

12


<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0351 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP318



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



4.7 mg/kg 1.32 6.206 mg/kg 0.000621 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


5 mg/kg 1.126 5.629 mg/kg 0.000563 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 21 mg/kg 1.56 32.756 mg/kg 0.0021 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



8.9 mg/kg 2.976 26.489 mg/kg 0.00265 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


35 mg/kg 2.774 97.095 mg/kg 0.00971 %024-007-00-3

11pH

8.5 pH 8.5 pH 8.5 pH PH

12


<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0175 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP319



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



6.8 mg/kg 1.32 8.978 mg/kg 0.000898 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.2 mg/kg 1.142 0.228 mg/kg 0.0000228 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


7.8 mg/kg 1.126 8.782 mg/kg 0.000878 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 40 mg/kg 1.56 62.393 mg/kg 0.004 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



9.9 mg/kg 2.976 29.465 mg/kg 0.00295 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


54 mg/kg 2.774 149.804 mg/kg 0.015 %024-007-00-3

11pH

8.4 pH 8.4 pH 8.4 pH PH

12


<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

0.08 mg/kg 0.08 mg/kg 0.000008 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.05 mg/kg 0.05 mg/kg 0.000005 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.05 mg/kg 0.05 mg/kg 0.000005 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0256 %











Sample details

Sample Name:TP320



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



5.4 mg/kg 1.32 7.13 mg/kg 0.000713 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.2 mg/kg 1.142 0.228 mg/kg 0.0000228 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


7.2 mg/kg 1.126 8.106 mg/kg 0.000811 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


1 23 mg/kg 1.56 35.876 mg/kg 0.0023 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6



8.8 mg/kg 2.976 26.191 mg/kg 0.00262 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7

9


034-002-00-8


90 mg/kg 2.774 249.673 mg/kg 0.025 %024-007-00-3

11pH

8.5 pH 8.5 pH 8.5 pH PH

12


<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

13naphthalene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


14acenaphthylene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

15acenaphthene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

16fluorene

<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

17phenanthrene

0.14 mg/kg 0.14 mg/kg 0.000014 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

18anthracene

0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

19fluoranthene

0.25 mg/kg 0.25 mg/kg 0.000025 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

20pyrene

0.23 mg/kg 0.23 mg/kg 0.000023 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.12 mg/kg 0.12 mg/kg 0.000012 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

22chrysene

0.11 mg/kg 0.11 mg/kg 0.000011 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.15 mg/kg 0.15 mg/kg 0.000015 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.11 mg/kg 0.11 mg/kg 0.000011 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 % 205-883-8 191-24-2

29phenol

<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2

Total: 0.0334 %








Appendix A: Classifier defined and non CLP determinands

chromium(III) oxide (EC Number: 215-160-9, CAS Number: 1308-38-9)

Conversion factor: 1.462Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Repr. 1B H360FD , Skin Sens. 1 H317 , Resp. Sens. 1 H334 ,Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , STOT SE 3 H335 , Eye Irrit. 2 H319 , Acute Tox. 4 H302 , Acute Tox. 4 H332

mercury(II) sulphide (EC Number: 215-696-3, CAS Number: 1344-48-5)

Conversion factor: 1.16Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , STOT RE 2 H373 , Acute Tox. 2 H300 , Acute Tox. 1 H310 , AcuteTox. 3 H331

pH (CAS Number: PH)

Description/Comments: Appendix C4Data source: WM3 1st Edition 2015Data source date: 25 May 2015Hazard Statements: None.

salts of hydrogen cyanide with the exception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides, ferricyanides and mercuricoxycyanide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex

CLP index number: 006-007-00-5Description/Comments: Conversion factor based on a worst case compound: sodium cyanideData source: Commission Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 - 1st Adaptation to Technical Progress for Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.(ATP1)Additional Hazard Statement(s): EUH032 >= 0.2 %Reason for additional Hazards Statement(s)/Risk Phrase(s):14 Dec 2015 - EUH032 >= 0.2 % hazard statement sourced from: WM3, Table C12.2

acenaphthylene (EC Number: 205-917-1, CAS Number: 208-96-8)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , STOT SE 3 H335 , Eye Irrit. 2 H319 , Acute Tox. 1 H310 , Acute Tox. 1 H330 , Acute Tox. 4 H302

acenaphthene (EC Number: 201-469-6, CAS Number: 83-32-9)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 2 H411 , Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , STOT SE 3 H335 ,Eye Irrit. 2 H319

fluorene (EC Number: 201-695-5, CAS Number: 86-73-7)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 06 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400

phenanthrene (EC Number: 201-581-5, CAS Number: 85-01-8)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 06 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Skin Sens. 1 H317 , Carc. 2 H351 , STOT SE 3H335 , Eye Irrit. 2 H319 , Acute Tox. 4 H302

anthracene (EC Number: 204-371-1, CAS Number: 120-12-7)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Skin Sens. 1 H317 , Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , STOT SE 3 H335 , EyeIrrit. 2 H319



fluoranthene (EC Number: 205-912-4, CAS Number: 206-44-0)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 21 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Acute Tox. 4 H302

pyrene (EC Number: 204-927-3, CAS Number: 129-00-0)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory Database; SDS Sigma Aldrich 2014Data source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 21 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , STOT SE 3 H335 , Eye Irrit. 2 H319 , Skin Irrit. 2 H315

indeno[123-cd]pyrene (EC Number: 205-893-2, CAS Number: 193-39-5)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 06 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Carc. 2 H351

benzo[ghi]perylene (EC Number: 205-883-8, CAS Number: 191-24-2)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory Database; SDS Sigma Aldrich 28/02/2015Data source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 23 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400

TPH (C6 to C40) petroleum group (CAS Number: TPH)

Description/Comments: Hazard statements taken from WM3 1st Edition 2015; Risk phrases: WM2 3rd Edition 2013Data source: WM3 1st Edition 2015Data source date: 25 May 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 2 H411 , Repr. 2 H361d , Carc. 1B H350 , Muta. 1B H340 , STOT RE 2 H373 , Asp. Tox. 1 H304 ,Flam. Liq. 3 H226

Appendix B: Rationale for selection of metal species

arsenic {arsenic trioxide}

Worst case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight and low solubility. Industrial sources include: flame retardants inelectrical apparatus, textiles and coatings.

cadmium {cadmium oxide}

Reasonable case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight, very low solubility in water. Industrial sources include:electroplating baths, electrodes for storage batteries, catalysts, ceramic glazes, phosphors, pigments and nematocides.

chromium in chromium(III) compounds {chromium(III) oxide}

Reasonable case species based on hazard statements/molecular weight. Industrial sources include: tanning, pigment in paint, inks andglass.

chromium in chromium(VI) compounds {chromium(VI) oxide}

Worst case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight. Industrial sources include: production stainless steel,electroplating, wood preservation, anti-corrosion agents or coatings, pigments

copper {dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide}

Reasonable case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight and insolubility in water. Industrial sources include:oxidised copper metal, brake pads, pigments, antifouling paints, fungicide. (edit as required) Worse case copper sulphate is very solubleand likely to have been leached away if ever present and/or not enough soluble sulphate detected.

lead {lead chromate}

Worst case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight.

mercury {mercury(II) sulphide}


nickel {nickel chromate}


selenium {selenium compounds with the exception of cadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex}

Harmonised group entry used as most reasonable case. Pigment cadmium sulphoselenide not likely to be present in this soil. Noevidence for the other CLP entries: sodium selenite, nickel II selenite and nickel selenide, to be present in this soil.



zinc {zinc chromate}


cyanides {salts of hydrogen cyanide with the exception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides, ferricyanides andmercuric oxycyanide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex}

Harmonised group entry used as most reasonable case as complex cyanides and those specified elsewhere in the annex are not likelyto be present in this soil: [Note conversion factor based on a worst case compound: sodium cyanide]

Appendix C: Version

HazWasteOnline Classification Engine: WM3 1st Edition v1.1, May 2018HazWasteOnline Classification Engine Version: 2019.197.3909.7942 (16 Jul 2019)HazWasteOnline Database: 2019.197.3909.7942 (16 Jul 2019)

This classification utilises the following guidance and legislation:WM3 v1.1 - Waste Classification - 1st Edition v1.1 - May 2018CLP Regulation - Regulation 1272/2008/EC of 16 December 20081st ATP - Regulation 790/2009/EC of 10 August 20092nd ATP - Regulation 286/2011/EC of 10 March 20113rd ATP - Regulation 618/2012/EU of 10 July 20124th ATP - Regulation 487/2013/EU of 8 May 2013Correction to 1st ATP - Regulation 758/2013/EU of 7 August 20135th ATP - Regulation 944/2013/EU of 2 October 20136th ATP - Regulation 605/2014/EU of 5 June 2014WFD Annex III replacement - Regulation 1357/2014/EU of 18 December 2014Revised List of Wastes 2014 - Decision 2014/955/EU of 18 December 20147th ATP - Regulation 2015/1221/EU of 24 July 20158th ATP - Regulation (EU) 2016/918 of 19 May 20169th ATP - Regulation (EU) 2016/1179 of 19 July 201610th ATP - Regulation (EU) 2017/776 of 4 May 2017HP14 amendment - Regulation (EU) 2017/997 of 8 June 201713th ATP - Regulation (EU) 2018/1480 of 4 October 2018POPs Regulation 2004 - Regulation 850/2004/EC of 29 April 20041st ATP to POPs Regulation - Regulation 756/2010/EU of 24 August 20102nd ATP to POPs Regulation - Regulation 757/2010/EU of 24 August 2010



Appendix H Notes on Limitations



GeneralJPG (Leeds) Limited have prepared this report solely for the use of the Client and those parties with whom a warrantyagreement has been executed, or with whom an assignment has been agreed. Should any third party wish to use orrely upon the contents of the report, written approval must be sought from JPG (Leeds) Limited; a charge may belevied against such approval.

JPG (Leeds) Limited accepts no responsibility or liability for:

a) the consequences of this document being used for any purpose or project other than for which it wascommissioned, and

b) this document to any third party with whom an agreement has not been executed.

Phase I Desk Study ReportsThe work undertaken to provide the basis of this report comprised a study of available documented information froma variety of sources (including the Client), together with (where appropriate) a brief walk over inspection of the siteand meetings and discussions with relevant authorities and other interested parties. The opinions given in this reporthave been dictated by the finite data on which they are based and are relevant only to the purpose for which thereport was commissioned. The information reviewed should not be considered exhaustive and has been accepted ingood faith as providing true and representative data pertaining to site conditions. Should additional informationbecome available which may affect the opinions expressed in this report, JPG (Leeds) Limited reserves the right toreview such information and, if warranted, to modify the opinions accordingly.

It should be noted that any risks identified in this report are perceived risks based on the information reviewed; actualrisks can only be assessed following a physical investigation of the site.

Phase II Geo-Environmental InvestigationsThe investigation of the site has been carried out to provide sufficient information concerning the type and degree ofcontamination, geotechnical characteristics and ground and groundwater conditions to allow a reasonableassessment of the environmental risks together with engineering and development implications. The objectives of theinvestigation have been limited to establishing the risks associated with potential human targets, building materials,the environment (including adjacent land), and to surface and groundwater.

The amount of exploratory work and chemical testing undertaken has necessarily been restricted by the shorttimescale available, and the locations of exploratory holes have been restricted to the areas unoccupied by thebuilding(s) on the site and by buried services. A more comprehensive investigation may be required if the site is to beredeveloped as, in addition to risk assessment, a number of important engineering and environmental issues mayneed to be resolved.

For these reasons if costs have been included in relation to site remediation these must be considered as tentativeonly and must, in any event, be confirmed by a qualified quantity surveyor.

The exploratory holes undertaken, which investigate only a small volume of the ground in relation to the size of the site,can only provide a general indication of site conditions. The opinions provided and recommendations given in thisreport are based on the ground conditions apparent at the site of each of the exploratory holes. There may beexceptional ground conditions elsewhere on the site which have not been disclosed by this investigation and whichhave therefore not been taken into account in this report.

The comments made on groundwater conditions are based on observations made at the time that site work wascarried out. It should be noted that groundwater levels will vary owing to seasonal, tidal and weather related effects.

The number of sampling points and the methods of sampling and testing do not preclude the existence of localised"hotspots" of contamination where concentrations may be significantly higher than those actually encountered.

The risk assessment and opinions provided, inter alia, take in to consideration currently available guidance valuesrelating to acceptable contamination concentrations; no liability can be accepted for the retrospective effects ofany future changes or amendments to these values.

The scope of the investigation was selected on the basis of the specific development proposed by the Client and maybe inappropriate to another form of development or scheme.

5 John Charles WayLEEDSLS12 6QA

Tel: 0113 263 [email protected]

Appendix D Cone Penetration Testing Report

Documents

Transcript of Appendix D Cone Penetration Testing Report