Aphg urban land models

16
Urban Land Urban Land Models Models AP Human Geography Summit International Preparatory

Transcript of Aphg urban land models

Page 1: Aphg   urban land models

Urban Land ModelsUrban Land ModelsAP Human GeographySummit International Preparatory

Page 2: Aphg   urban land models

What do we always say What do we always say about models?about models?Most importantly – they are just modelsModels only represent patterns in spaceThe landscape does NOT look exactly

like the modelModels are thus representations of the

landscape to help better understand patterns

Page 3: Aphg   urban land models

Three Classic Urban Models

Other Urban Models

Page 4: Aphg   urban land models

Burgess Concentric Zone Burgess Concentric Zone ModelModel

http://www.lgfl.net/lgfl/leas/barnet/accounts/migration/web/Land%20Use/documents/burgess-re-done.jpghttp://www.lgfl.net/lgfl/leas/barnet/accounts/migration/web/Land%20Use/documents/burgess-re-done.jpg

Page 5: Aphg   urban land models

Characteristics of Concentric Characteristics of Concentric ZoneZone

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Burgessen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Burgess

Burgess studied 1920s Chicago to make this model

5 concentric zones Burgess suggested

that immigrants lived in inner zones which caused affluent residents to move further out

Concentric Zone’s weakness is that it does not allow for change in the city

Concentric Zone does not allow for physical geographic barriers

Page 6: Aphg   urban land models

Or, how about this?Or, how about this?

Page 7: Aphg   urban land models

Hoyt Sector ModelHoyt Sector Model

Page 8: Aphg   urban land models

Hoyt Sector ModelHoyt Sector Model Late 1930s Answered the drawbacks

of Burgess Model Hoyt said growth

created pie-shaped urban structure

Hoyt said his pie-shaped zones could reach from the Core (CBD) to the edge of the city (e.g. low rent sector 3 from CBD to outskirt of city)

Sector Model says that the CBD is not as important as Burgess indicated

Sectors were developed along transport routes (e.g. highways, RRs, etc.)

Page 9: Aphg   urban land models

Or, how about this?Or, how about this?

Page 10: Aphg   urban land models

Harris & Ullman – Multiple Harris & Ullman – Multiple NucleiNucleihttp://teacherweb.ftl.pinecrest.edu/snyderd/APHGhttp://teacherweb.ftl.pinecrest.edu/snyderd/APHG

Page 11: Aphg   urban land models

Multiple NucleiMultiple Nuclei 1940s Harris & Ullman

hypothesized the CBD was further losing its dominance

CBD no longer the nucleus of the modern city, thus emergence of ‘nuclei’

Reflects decentralization and nucleation of urban functions

Nuclei are disconnected and do not necessarily rely on each other

Page 12: Aphg   urban land models

Or, how about this?Or, how about this?

Page 13: Aphg   urban land models

Let’s look at all three nowLet’s look at all three nowwww.csiss.orgwww.csiss.org

Page 14: Aphg   urban land models

Urban Realms ModelUrban Realms Modelwww.csiss.orgwww.csiss.org

Hartshorn and Mueller

1980sModeled after

cities like Atlanta and Los Angeles

Further metamorphosis of multiple nuclei

Page 15: Aphg   urban land models

World Urban ModelsWorld Urban Models www.macalester.edu/.../amartin/urbanstruct.htmlwww.macalester.edu/.../amartin/urbanstruct.html www.macalester.edu/.../tsadowy/Jabotek.html www.macalester.edu/.../tsadowy/Jabotek.html

Page 16: Aphg   urban land models

Let’s look at all three nowLet’s look at all three now