An Introduction to Hyperfine Structure and Its G-factor Course Projects/An Introduction to...
Transcript of An Introduction to Hyperfine Structure and Its G-factor Course Projects/An Introduction to...
1
An Introduction to Hyperfine Structure and Its G-factor
Xiqiao Wang
East Tennessee State University
April 25, 2012
2
1. Introduction
In a book chapter entitled Model Calculations of Radiation Induced Damage in DNA
Constituents Using Density Functional Theory, Dr. Close summarized the current status
about the primary radiation induced damage to DNA, by summarizing the results from
detailed EPR (Electron Paramagnetic Resonance) experiments, and to explore the use of
theoretical calculations to assist in making free radical assignments (Computational
Chemistry: Reviews of Current Trends, Vol.8). The theoretical calculations include
estimates of spin densities and isotropic and anisotropic hyperfine couplings which can
be compared with experimental results. In many cases the theoretical and experimental
results agree rather well. In other cases there are discrepancies between the theoretical
and experimental results. The successes and failures of density functional theory to
calculate spin densities and hyperfine couplings of more than twenty primary radiation
induced radicals observed in the nucleobases were discussed. There are four prominent
failures in this list. I plan to address these discrepancies in this summer as a part of my
honor thesis project. However, since the EPR experiments are closely related to atomic
and molecular hyperfine structure, a better understanding of hyperfine structure and how
it relates with EPR spectra will definitely benefit the problem solving process. In the
following sections, I will present a detailed illustration of the physical and mathematical
methods used in defining atomic hyperfine structure from a classical electromagnetic
view. Then a brief insight into the relation between EPR technique and hyperfine
structure will be given though a comparison of g factors.
2. Introduction to the hyperfine structure.
2.1.Gross structure
The gross structure of line spectra is the line spectra predicted by non-relativistic
electrons with no spin. For a hydrogenic atom, the gross structure energy levels only
depend on the principal quantum number n. If external magnetic field is present,
hydrogenic atom’s gross spectra lines is further split in according to the quantized
direction of electron orbital momentum.
2.2.Fine structure
3
However, a more accurate model takes into account relativistic and spin effects,
which break the degeneracy of the energy levels and split the spectral lines. Fine
structure results from the interaction between the magnetic moments associated with
electron spin and the electrons' orbital angular momentum. The scale of the fine
structure splitting relative to the gross structure splitting is on the order of
where Z is the atomic number and α is the fine-structure constant , a dimensionless
number equal to approximately 7.297×10E−3 (Yang, 2004).
The fine structure can be separated into three corrective terms: the electron’s kinetic
energy term considering the special relativity, the spin-orbit magnetic coupling term,
and the Darwinian term.
The spin-orbit correction arises when we shift from the standard frame of reference
(where the electron orbits the nucleus) into one where the electron is stationary and
the nucleus instead orbits it. In this case the orbiting nucleus functions as an effective
current loop, which in turn will generate a magnetic field. However, the electron itself
has a magnetic moment due to its intrinsic angular momentum. The two magnetic
vectors, B and μs couple together so that there is a certain energy cost depending on
their relative orientation. This orbital-spin coupling leaves l and s no longer good
quantum number to describe the system. Instead, quantum number j, which takes
values of , is calculated to be a proper
quantum number to represent energy levels due to L, S, and their coupling. Under an
external magnetic field, which is similar to the behavior of ms, each j further slips
into .
The Darwin term changes the effective potential at the nucleus. It can be interpreted
as a smearing out of the electrostatic interaction between the electron and nucleus due
to rapid quantum oscillations, of the electron.
Situations tend to be more complicated in multi-electron atomic system. In light
atoms (generally Z < 30), it is a good approximation to consider electron spins
4
interacting among themselves. So they combine to form a total spin angular
momentum S. The same happens with orbital angular momenta , forming a total
orbital angular momentum L. The interaction between the total quantum numbers L
and S is also called L-S coupling. Then S and L couple together and form a total
angular momentum J, similar to the single electron case. However, the situation is
different in heavier atoms. Spin-orbit interactions are frequently as large as or larger
than spin-spin interactions or orbit-orbit interactions. In this situation, each orbital
angular momentum , tends to combine with the corresponding individual spin
angular momentum , originating an individual total angular momentum . These
then couple up to form the total angular momentum J. This is called J-J coupling.
2.3.Hyperfine structure
The theory of hyperfine structure comes directly from electromagnetism, consisting
of the interaction of the nuclear multipole moments (excluding the electric monopole)
with internally generated electromagnetic fields. Typically, its energy shifts’ orders of
magnitude are smaller than those of fine structure.
As we know, nucleus is not a single point but occupies some geometric space. It has a
charge distribution, angular momentum and magnetic moment. The magnetic moment
of a nucleus is induced by the orbiting charged particles (the protons) giving rise to an
orbital magnetic field and by the intrinsic spin s = 1/2 of the nucleons, inducing their
own intrinsic magnetic field. And the non-spherical distribution of the charges in a
nucleus gives rise to electric moments. The energy introduced from the nuclear
electric monopole leads to the gross spectra, and nuclear electric dipole turns to
always be zero both experimentally and theoretically. Thus the nuclear electric
multipoles start with electric quadrupole in hyperfine spectra.
In atoms, the magnitudes are similar for both the energy of the nuclear magnetic
dipole moment in the magnetic field generated by the electrons, and the energy of the
nuclear electric quadrupole moment in the electric field gradient due to the
distribution of charge within the atom. Higher order multipole components will drop
5
off with distance more rapidly, so only the dipole component of magnetic field and
the quadrupole component of electric field will dominate at distances far away from
source. This is in consistence with theoretical calculations which shows that higher
order interactions are at least 10E8 times smaller than these two main interactions
(Yang, 2004)). Molecular hyperfine structure is generally dominated by these two
effects, but also includes the energy associated with the interaction between the
magnetic moments associated with different magnetic nuclei in a molecule, as well as
between the nuclear magnetic moments and the magnetic field generated by the
rotation of the molecule.
Below is a table that compares energy shift magnitudes for gross structure, fine
structure and hyperfine structure.
interactions Energy level change magnitudes
Wavelength (cm^-
1)
Energy (eV) Frequency (Hz)
Central Coulomb
Potential
30 000 4 10E15
Fine structure 1 – 1 000 10E-4 – 10E-1 3E10 – 3E13
Hyperfine structure 10E-1 - 1 10E-7 – 10E-4 3E7 – 3E10
Table 1. Energy shift magnitudes for gross, fine and hyperfine structure (Yang, 2004).
The figure below gives a good illustration of the L-S coupling of electron angular
momentum and the electron-nucleus coupling of the total atomic angular momentum.
6
Figure1. The angular momentum coupling of an atom (Yang, 2004).
2.3.1. Atomic magnetic dipole hyperfine structure
From experiment result, we know that the spins of all even-even nuclei, whose
proton number and neutron number are both even, are zero; the spins of all
even-odd nuclei, whose either proton number or neutron number is odd, are
odd integral multiple of one half reduce Planck constant; the spins of odd-odd
nuclei are integral multiple of reduced Planck constant. Notice that this
statement only hold true for ground state nuclei, according to Shell Model (Xu,
1978). Nucleus’ g factor, also called g factor, is the ratio of measured z
component of a nucleus’ magnetic moment in the unit of nuclear magneton to
angular momentum quantum number in the unit of reduced Planck constant.
Similar g factors can be defined for nucleons. Take simple Helium nucleus for
example. Theoretically, its orbital angular momentum is zero and its nuclear
magnetic moment should be proportional to its nuclear spin angular
momentum I as follows,
, where
is nuclear magneton.
Space quantization allows 2I+1 different orientations for spin angular
momentum with the magnetic moment’s z projections to be
7
In magnetic field, this nuclear spin magmetic moment will generate an energy
shift of
.
Generally, with nucleus’ orbital angular momentum present and the first term
truncation of nuclear magnetic multipole expansion, the nuclear magnetic
dipole moment can be expressed as
∑
∑
Where A is the atomic mass number, the free-nucleon gyromagnetic factors
for protons and neutrons are
with units of radian per second per tesla ( ) (John A. Weil, 2007).
Note that the gyromagnetic ratio is the ratio of its magnetic dipole moment to
its angular momentum. Though sometimes it is used as a synonym for a
different but closely related quantity, the g-factor, distinguish should be made
between them. g-factors are dimensionless which can be categorized into
electron orbital g-factor, electron spin g-factor, nucleon and nuclear g-factor.
Lande g-factor is used in special case to represent the total electron magnetic
moment with orbital-spin coupling.
The dominant term in the hyperfine Hamiltonian is typically the magnetic
dipole term, whose dominant term is from nuclear spin magnetic moment.
Atomic nuclei with a non-zero nuclear spin have a magnetic dipole moment,
given by
There is an energy associated with a magnetic dipole moment in the presence
of a magnetic field. In the absence of an externally applied field, the magnetic
field experienced by the nucleus is that associated with the orbital and spin
angular momentum of the electrons. Then the Hamiltonian will be
8
where
. Since the total magnetic field of an electron is
proportional to its L-S coupling angular momentum, J, the Hamiltonian can
be written in a form with hyperfine coupling constant, A,
Specifically, electron orbital angular momentum results from the motion of
the electron about some fixed external point that we shall take to be the
location of the nucleus. The magnetic field at the nucleus due to the motion of
a single electron, with charge -e at a position r relative to the nucleus, is given
by
where -r gives the position of the nucleus relative to the electron and is
Bohr magneton. Recognizing that is the electron momentum, p, and that
r×p/ħ is the orbital angular momentum in units of ħ.
The electron spin angular momentum is a fundamentally different property
that is intrinsic to the particle and therefore does not depend on the motion of
the electron. Nonetheless it is angular momentum and any angular momentum
associated with a charged particle results in a magnetic moment, which is the
source of a magnetic field. As we know, the vector potential of magnetic field
produced by magnetic moment m is
Where is the electron spin magnetic moment with electron spin g-factor of
about 2 (R. Neugart, 2005) (Costella, 1994), and the magnetic field will be
However, a correction term is added when the dipole limit is used to calculate
fields inside a magnetic material. Now consider a spherical body over which a
magnetic dipole moment density is uniformly distributed. The magnetic field
generated will have the form as follows for both inside and outside the sphere
9
{
where is the total magnetic dipole moment of the sphere. Clearly, as the
radius of the sphere goes to zero, the magnetic field goes to infinity inside the
sphere. However, by noticing that
∫
One is therefore naturally led to think of a three-dimensional Dirac delta
function as a convenient description for the internal fields, since it also has the
property of diverging at the origin, while having a constant, finite volume
integral. By some mathematical manipulation, we will finally obtain the
complete form of magnetic dipole field.
(
)
Usually, a function which is named the principle value of the function of B(r)
when r>R is used as a prefix, in order to correctly represent a point
magnetic dipole field (Costella, 1994). is defined as
{
But because for the electrons other than s orbital electrons, their
wavefunctions all have a node at r=0, this prefix usually does not necessary to
be appear in magnetic dipole hyperfine structure approximation.
Since currently, electron is still considered as a dimension less single point,
whereas it owns an intrinsic spin momentum, a point magnetic dipole field
will be a good approximation.
Finally, for a many electron atomic system, the magnetic dipole contribution
to the hyperfine structure can be represented as
10
{∑[
(
)
]
}
Noting that
and
(Yang, 2004).
The first summation term gives the energy of the nuclear dipole in the field
due to the electronic orbital angular momentum, and the second summation
term gives the energy of the interaction of the nuclear dipole with the field due
to the electron spin magnetic. In case of the probability for electrons to be
appearing inside the nucleus, the third summation term gives an
approximation of the direct magnetic interaction between an electron and an
atomic nucleus when the electron is inside that nucleus. Within an atom, only
s-orbital electrons have non-zero density at the nucleus, so the contact
interaction only occurs for s-electrons. In fact, from the spherical symmetry of
filled electron shell in atom, the summation above only need to be conducted
for all the valence electrons. Even though for valence electron, the spin
angular momentum will not contribute to hyperfine structure for paired
valence electrons. A typical example a valence shell. If, by LS coupling
of many-electron atomic system, they are in configuration state, then no
dipole magnetic hyperfine structure will be induced from these two valence
electrons.
In single electron atom case for electron state of , the magnetic dipole
hyperfine Hamiltonian can be expressed as
where
. For the angular momentum vector processions
around the electron’s total angular momentum J, the effective contribution of
N should be its projection on J direction, thus
11
Similar to the L-S coupling in fine structure, this hyperfine energy shift can be
calculated as
⟨ ⟩
[ ]
where is the total angular momentum for this whole single electron
atomic system. In the same principle, the hyperfine energy shift for many
electron atomic system can be expressed as
[ ]
The hyperfine coupling constant A(J) here covers the effect of Fermi Contact,
and it is usually measured from experiment. This hyperfine coupling constant
of a nucleus is directly related to the spectral line spacing in Electron Spin
Resonance spectra. Through it can also be calculated theoretically, we have to
obtain the wavefunction for the whole system before any theoretical (Alan
Carrington, 1967) prediction. The atomic total angular momentum quantum
number F can have values
Whereas in the presence of external magnetic field, each F energy level will
further split into 2F+1 sublevels, corresponding to 2F+1 MF values. The direct
consequence of the expression is that
.
The selection rule of the magnetic dipole transition between different
hyperfine structure energy levels will be
Thus, in the hyperfine structure approximation level, s, l, are no longer good
quantum numbers that can correctly describe the state of an atomic system.
However, the amplitude operator can still be sharp at the
same time.
12
2.3.2. Atomic electric quadrupole hyperfine structure
Some nuclei with spins of 1 or more also possess an electric quadrupole
moment with occurs because the distribution of electric charge density
inside the nucleus is ellipsoidal rather than spherical (Alan Carrington,
1967). It is defined by
∫
Here the z direction is parallel to the spin vector I and the integral extends
over the interior of the nucleus. If an electric field gradient exist at the nucleus,
an electric quadrupole hyperfine coupling will introduce an additional energy
level split. Quantum mechanics calculations show that the energy shift due to
nuclear electric quadrupole hyperfine coupling can be represented as
Where , and ⟨
⟩ (Yang, 2004).
Q is the electric quadrupole of the nucleus and ⟨
⟩ is the expectation value
of the electric field gradient due to extranuclear electrons, which depends on
specific electron wave functions. It should be noted that in the following three
cases, the electric quadrupole coupling does not exist. (1) For the spherically
symmetric distribution of s orbital electrons, their ⟨
⟩ at r=0. (2) When
the total nuclear spin angular momentum I=0 or ½, Q=0. (3) For electrons
with total angular momentum of J=0 or ½, their ⟨
⟩ at r=0. Except for
those three cases mentioned above, the hyperfine coupling energy shifts are
always the superposition of magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole
components, which can be written in a general form (Yang, 2004)
2.3.3. Molecular hyperfine structure
The molecular hyperfine Hamiltonian includes those terms already derived for
the atomic case with a magnetic dipole term for each nucleus with I>0 and an
electric quadrupole term for each nucleus with I>1. In addition to the effects
13
described above there are a number of effects specific to the molecular case.
For example, direct nuclear spin-spin coupling occurs for each nucleus with
I>0 due to the presence of the combined field of all of the other nuclear
magnetic moments in a molecule. A summation over each magnetic moment
dotted with the field due to each other magnetic moment gives the direct
nuclear spin-spin term in the hyperfine Hamiltonian
∑
where a and a’ are indices representing the nucleus contributing to the energy
and the nucleus that is the source of the field respectively (Alan Carrington,
1967). Another example of molecular hyperfine component will be the
nuclear spin-rotation hyperfine coupling where the nuclear magnetic
momentum in a molecule obtains extra energy in a magnetic field component
due to the angular momentum associated with the bulk rotation of the
molecule. Such kinds of weak hyperfine coupling structures are numerous. It
is our application purpose that decides to which level of approximation we
should refer.
3. Electron Spin Resonance.
The principle idea behind any magnetic resonance are common for both electron spin
resonance and nuclear magnetic resonance, but there are differences in the magnitudes
and signs of the magnetic interactions involved, which naturally leads to divergence in
the experimental techniques employed.
If a molecule has one or more unpaired electrons, then this unpaired electron spin
magnetic moment will be the dominant contribution to the total magnetic moment.
Typical examples are free radicals and complexes possessing a transition metal ion. In
these cases, Electron Spin Resonance technique is used to study the molecular structure.
After deriving all the fantasy hyperfine structures in atoms and molecule, one may be
confused about why we get rid of that more comprehensive hyperfine structure model
and come back to Zeeman fine structure again in ESR practice. To explain the reason, let
14
us have a brief look of how ESP technique is used to decide molecular structures from g
factor.
3.1.EPR experiment
For an isolated electron, its magnetic moment and Hamiltonian under an applied
external magnetic field B (assuming B is along z direction) are
where is the gyromagnetic ratio for an isolated electron. The allowed component
of the electron spin in the z direction has value +1/2 or -1/2. In order to induce
transitions between the two electron spin levels, an oscillating electromagnetic field is
applied to the system. Absorption of energy occurs provided the magnetic vector of
the oscllating field is perpendicular to the steady field B and prvided the frequency v
of the oscillating field satisfies the resonance condition,
This equation indicates that one could look for a nuclear resonance absorption by
varying either the magnetic field B or the frequency v. In practice, one usually works
with a fixed frequency v, sweeping the magnetic field through the resonance value
and obtain a spectrum in which the absorption of the energy is plotted as a function of
the magnetic field strength. Since in terms of gyromagnetic ratio and angular
frequency, the Hamiltonian can be written as
In fact, the unpaired electron in molecule is not isolated. The spectrometer’s applied
resonance magnetic field in resonance condition must be replaced by an effective
field whose value is slightly different from B and varies according to the chemical
environment of the electron. The effective field experienced by the electron is
thus written as , where includes the effect of local environment
and can be either positive or negative. Thus the resonance condition can be rewritten
as
15
The quantity of is denoted as the g factor for the system. The magnitude of
change of g factor gives plenty of information about the electron spin-orbital coupling
and electron-nucleus coupling, which indicate molecular orbital and nucleus structure
around this unpaired electron.
3.2.Theoretical g factor
From quantum mechanics calculations, g factors can be evaluated for fine/hyperfine
structures at different approximation level (Xu, 1978). By considering the electron
orbital-spin coupling, the total magnetic moment of an electron can be expressed in
terms of Lande g factor,
Where
When the nuclear magnetic dipole interaction (hyperfine coupling) is considered in
atomic system, the total magnetic moment of the atom can be written as
Where
, and
equals the mass
ratio of electron to proton. For hyperfine structure including electric quadrupole
coupling, g factor in terms of quantum number K can be derived.
Thus the experimentally observed g factor can be used to predict molecular structures
with the help of theoretical derived g factor.
16
Works Cited
Alan Carrington, A. D. (1967). Introduction to Magnetic Resonance. New York: Harper & Row.
Costella, J. P. (1994). Single-Particle Electrodynamics. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
John A. Weil, J. R. (2007). Electron Paramagnetic Resonance-Elementary Theory and Practical
Applications. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience.
R. Neugart, G. N. (2005). Nuclear Moments. Mainz, Germany.
Xu, G. (1978). Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectrum Principle. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Yang, J. (2004). Atomic Physics. Beijing: Higher Education Press.