An introduction to advanced research, theory and methods in … · 2017-01-13 · NMQ 800 is a...

NMQ 800

An introduction to advanced research, theory and methods in education

Study guide 2017

Co-ordinator: Dr A Engelbrecht

Contact coordinators per department:

Educational Psychology: Dr F Omidire

Science, Mathematics and Technology Education: Dr B Mofolo-Mbokane

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1. INTRODUCTION TO NMQ 800 4

2. LEARNING OUTCOMES 4

3. COURSE REQUIREMENTS 5

4. ASSESSMENT 6

4.1 PREPARATION 6

4.2 SUBMISSION 6

4.3 PENALTY 6

4.4 CALCULATION OF MARKS 7

4.5 TECHNICAL MATTERS 7

4.6 REFERENCING 7

4.7 PLAGIARISM 7

4.8 COVERSHEET 8

5. CONTACT SESSIONS 9

3

STUDENTS IN THE DEPARTMENTS OF 10 EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION

7. PATHWAYS TO COMPLETE NMQ 800 11

7.1 OUTLINE 12

7.2 IMPORTANT DATES 13

7.3 PROPOSAL PRESENTATIONS LECTURERS/PRESENTERS 13

7.4 SCHEDULE 15

7.5 DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATORS 17

7.6 LECTURERS/PRESENTERS 18

7.7 PRESCRIBED AND RECOMMENDED READINGS 18

7.8 ASSIGNMENTS 20

7.9 GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSMENT AND RUBRICS 25

---oOo---

4

1. INTRODUCTION TO NMQ 800

NMQ 800 is a research methodology module, which focuses on the structure and development

of a research proposal and introduces students to the key philosophies, approaches,

methodologies and methods in educational inquiry. The course aims to assist you to develop

your research proposal. This includes defining and finding a good research question, conducting

a literature review, identifying and selecting an appropriate research design, drafting an

appropriate theoretical/conceptual framework, collecting and analysing data as well as taking into

account issues of validity, reliability, ethics and politics.

The course includes basic concepts and approaches associated with quantitative, qualitative and

mixed methods research designs, including action research, case study research, ethnographic

research, historical research, correlation research, experimental and quasi-experimental

research. The course also aims to ensure that you read and review scholarly work and are

sensitised to the ethical, political and emotional aspects of research. You will complete

assignments for submission, which will all contribute to the finalisation of your research proposal.

Please ensure that you complete the assignments prescribed by YOUR department.

Working on the assignments systematically and in consultation with your supervisor thus ought

to assist you in developing your research proposal. The proposal, if presented successfully, is

the tangible outcome of your passing this module. Please read this study guide thoroughly

BEFORE the lectures and discussions with your supervisor commence.

We wish you well in your studies.

2. LEARNING OUTCOMES

After completing NMQ 800 you should be able to:

explain the ontological, epistemological and methodological foundations of qualitative and

quantitative research;

distinguish among qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research designs in

education;

identify and develop good research questions;

review, critique and synthesize the research literature related to a particular research

problem;

choose a research strategy and methods appropriate for the research problem;

identify different ways to collect qualitative and quantitative data;

select suitable data analysis techniques;

5

establish reliability and validity in both quantitative and qualitative research;

justify the choice of research methodology, taking into account issues of politics and

ethics;

identify and address possible ethical concerns as well as the political and social

implications of research;

develop a broad understanding of the range of field-related education theories, ideas and

concepts that mark the current social science and educational landscape;

develop a basic level of competence in applying the major education theories, ideas and

concepts within your educational practices as a professional working in various

educational contexts (schools, clinics, colleges, universities, parastatals, NGOs,

development organizations and government);

develop an ability to apply theoretical understandings when conducting basic research in

education and the social sciences;

extend your theoretical insights based on the outcomes (results/findings) of empirical

inquiry;

become aware of and develop your own theoretical stances and how these impact on

your professional and scholarly engagement;

successfully develop a research proposal of approximately 10 to 12 pages.

3. MODULE REQUIREMENTS

NMQ 800 requires unusual dedication, commitment and effort on the part of every student in

order to succeed. You are expected to make an immense commitment of your time and energy.

It is important that you plan your work in advance and consult the relevant lecturers when you

need help. The following expectations apply:

Basic knowledge of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research is assumed on

the basis of the Honours degree training that precedes Masters studies.

You are expected to read well beyond the list of class references.

You must be fully computer literate. This includes knowing how to insert track changes

and e-comments as well as checking your documents for plagiarism using Turnitin.

You must be able to access ClickUP and do library research. There are training

programmes to help new students. You can contact [email protected] if

you have problems with ClickUP and [email protected] if you need

assistance with library searches.

You must attend all contact sessions.

mailto:[email protected]


6

4. ASSESSMENT

The assessment for NMQ 800 is based on the following:

Active participation in class, such that it reflects understanding of the readings.

A portfolio of works, consisting of assignments that will help you to develop and present

your research proposal at departmental level.

4.1 PREPARATION OF ASSIGNMENTS

You will work closely with your supervisor who will guide you in completing the

assignments, which will finally become your proposal. It is good to consult a wide literature

base when doing the assignments. Do not only stick to the prescribed readings. Should

you be uncertain how to proceed, please discuss the assignment with your supervisor well

before the due date. Take along all evidence of your own efforts to do the assignment and

clearly indicate why you are not able to proceed.

4.2 SUBMISSION OF ASSIGNMENTS

All assignments are compulsory. If any assignment is not submitted or completed you will

fail the module as the assignments contribute to the development of the final research

proposal.

Posted assignments must reach the relevant department before the due date.

Hard copies may be handed in at the departmental administrator’s office of the

department where you study before or on the dates of submission. Electronic submissions

can be uploaded to the NMQ 800 ClickUP page before or on the due date.

Please copy and staple the assessment rubric for each assignment just after the cover

page of each assignment that you submit. The relevant rubric has been printed after each

assignment.

No assignment will be marked unless the assignment has been signed by the

supervisor.

4.3 PENALTY FOR LATE SUBMISSIONS

The penalty procedures for late assignments will be determined by each department.

Although students will not be allowed to re-do an assignment for marks, students must

remember that this work must be improved and revised for the proposal.

7

4.4 CALCULATION OF MARKS

A final mark of 50% is required in order to pass NMQ 800. Students who obtain 40% and

less for an assignment must make an appointment with the relevant lecturer and his/her

supervisor before attempting the next assignment. All assignments will contribute to your

year mark. The subminimum for admission to the exam (proposal presentation) is 40%.

Assessment of your final proposal presentation of the proposal will form the examination

mark for this module. The final mark for the module is the average of the semester mark

and the examination mark. The examination mark comprises a supervisor’s mark that

contributes 40% and marks given by two critical readers of your final proposal, each

contributing 30% to the examination mark.

4.5 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

All assignments must be typed using Arial 12pt font and 1.5 line spacing.

Attach a cover sheet (see template below) with your name, student number, course and

assignment number, date of submission and contact details. Sign the declaration of

authorship.

Number all the pages and staple them together in the top left-hand corner. Do not use

paper clips. Avoid using fancy folders.

4.6 REFERENCING

It is very important that you fully acknowledge the sources of information used in the

preparation of your assignments. The preferred citation methods for essays are Harvard

or APA referencing. Ask your supervisor what the preferred method is. You can read more

about these referencing systems on the university web page. The reference list at the end

of your assignment should list – in alphabetical order – the authors’ surnames, all books,

articles, e-sources or other sources used in the preparation of the assignment.

4.7 PLAGIARISM

Any evidence of plagiarism will result in a disciplinary hearing. Do not copy and paste

excerpts that you find on the Internet. You will be required to check your drafts using

plagiarism detection software called Turnitin – available on the university’s IT system.

Plagiarism refers to the appropriation of the work or ideas of others. Plagiarism is both unethical and

illegal and may be regarded as a criminal offence in terms of the Copyright Act 98 of 1978. The University of Pretoria places a high premium on its academic standards and subscribes to a value system that requires strong action against plagiarism. Being regarded as a serious contravention of the University's rules, plagiarism can lead to expulsion from the University. For more information, see http://www.ais.up.ac.za/plagiarism/index.htm

http://www.ais.up.ac.za/plagiarism/index.htm

8

Cover sheet for assignments

Course code: NMQ 800

Department:

Supervisor:

Student name and number:

Contact number:

E-mail:

Assignment number:

Date submitted:

Declaration:

1. I understand what plagiarism is and I am aware of the University’s policy in this regard.

2. I declare that this assignment is my own original work. Where other people’s work has been

used (either from a printed or electronic source), this has been properly acknowledged and

referenced in accordance with departmental requirements.

3. I have not used work previously produced by another student or any other person to hand

in as my own.

4. I have not allowed, and will not allow, anyone to copy my work with the intention of passing

it off as his or her own work.

Signature (s): _______________________________

Signature of supervisor: _______________________________

9

5. CONTACT SESSIONS To align with the NMQ assignments for 2017 and with the research support sessions, you will

have three contact sessions (lectures) on Saturdays in 2017. All lectures take place between

08h30 and 15h30 in Aldoel 3 on the Groenkloof Campus, unless otherwise specified. Please

bring your own lunch and refreshments, if you do not wish to make use of the cafeteria on

campus.

DEPARTMENT VENUE DATES

Educational Psychology Aldoel 3

28 January

18 February

18 March Science, Mathematics and Technology

Education

Aldoel 3

10

STUDENTS IN THE DEPARTMENTS OF:

EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY

SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS AND TECHNOLOGY

EDUCATION

11

7. PATHWAYS TO COMPLETE NMQ 800

In NMQ 800 you may follow one of three pathways to complete and successfully present

your proposal, which marks the completion of the module. The various pathways are

summarised below.

PATHWAY 1 PATHWAY 2 PATHWAY 3

Assignment 1 5 February 2017

26 February 2017 Additional lectures and dates

for assignments can be

arranged per department for

students whose programmes

cannot accommodate

Pathway 1 or 2

Assignment 2 26 February 2017

25 March 2017

Assignment 3 18 March 2017 22 April 2017

Proposal

presentation

April 2017 June 2017 October/November 2017

Ethical

clearance

May to July 2017 July to September

2017

March 2017

Commence

with field work

August 2017

onwards

October 2017

onwards

April 2017 onwards

Approval of your proposal will involve (i) submission of a finalised proposal signed off by

your supervisor, after the comments on assignments have been worked into the

proposal; and (ii) a presentation of your proposal at departmental level. Once this process

has been completed you need to obtain ethical clearance before commencing with any

field work. Taking into account that ethical clearance can involve a lengthy process, e.g.

when you do research with vulnerable youth and require clearance from the Faculty of

Education as well as the Faculty of Health Sciences, and due to the Department of Basic

Education’s stipulation that research may not be undertaken in schools in the last quarter

of the year, we strongly advise you to pursue Pathway 1.

The earlier you finalise your proposal, the better your chances are to complete your MEd

study in the two years allowed for MEd studies, thereby keeping to UP regulations and

not placing any bursary you may receive at risk. If, however, your circumstances do not

allow you to keep to the timeline of either Pathway 1 or Pathway 2, additional support

12

can be provided on departmental level, in order to support you to complete this process

in the second half of the first year of study, with you thereby following Pathway 3.

7.1 BROAD OUTLINE OF THE MAIN STEPS INVOLVED IN COMPLETING THE DISSERTATION FOR

PATHWAYS 1 AND 2

Step 1: Initial meeting and introduction to NMQ800

Initial meeting with MEd students per department – October/November 2016

Distribution of outline of proposals and discussion of expectations for proposals

(departmental coordinators)

Distribution of examples of well-written proposals

Introduction to and initial discussion on Assignment 1

Meetings between students and their supervisors, in order to clarify foci/research

questions (meetings to be arranged by students).

Step 2: Independent literature review and first draft of Assignment 1

November 2016 to January 2017

Students work independently on their proposals (specifically the literature review

and a draft Assignment 1) according to the guidelines and examples provided

No formal supervision by supervisors.

Step 3: Activities for first study year (2017)

Lectures: Three Saturdays as per time-table

Assignments 1 to 3

Proposal presentations middle to end of April for Pathway 1, or by the end of June

(school holidays) for Pathway 2

Remainder of the first MEd year: obtaining ethical clearance and working on

chapters (e.g. 1, 2 and 3), if possible data collection.

Step 4 : Activities for second study year (2018)

Completion of data collection, analysis and dissertation

13

7.2 OVERVIEW OF IMPORTANT DATES FOR PATHWAYS 1 AND 2

DATE ACTIVITY PATHWAY 1 PATHWAY 2

November 2016 Introduction

Theme 1 Receive Assignment 1 Receive Assignment 1

Research support sessions1

Saturday

28 January 2017

Lecture

Theme 2

Assignment 1 draft ready (for discussion)


Friday

5 February 2017 Submit Assignment 1

Saturday

18 February 2017

Lecture

Theme 3


Friday

26 February 2017 Submit Assignment 2 Submit Assignment 1

Saturday

18 March 2017

Lecture

Theme 4


Friday

18 March 2017

Submit Assignment 3

Friday

25 March 2017 Submit Assignment 2

Friday

22 April 2017 Submit Assignment 3

Middle to end of April 2017

Proposal presentations

June 2017 Proposal presentations

NB: Students in the Department of Educational Psychology will only follow

pathway 1

7.3 PROPOSAL PRESENTATIONS (NMQ 800 EXAMINATION)

After receiving feedback on Assignments 1 to 3, you will be expected to improve and

refine your proposal, in consultation with your supervisor. When your supervisor is

satisfied with the changes you will be allowed to present your proposal to the department.

For this meeting, two critical readers will be appointed in the department, to assess the

1 The first Faculty research support session (26 and 27 January 2016) is compulsory for all MEd students

in the Faculty. Research support sessions during the rest of the year are voluntary to attend.

14

final proposal you submit to the department. When presenting your research proposal

(10-12 pages), you need to answer three main questions, namely:

What would you like to research?

Why?

How do you plan to do your research?

The spirit and purpose of proposal presentation meetings is supportive, with the aim of

your proposal being approved by the department, so that you may proceed with their

study. For this purpose the two critical readers will provide constructive feedback to you

and your supervisor, for consideration as you proceed with your study. The critical

readers will each allocate a mark for your final proposal and presentation. Your

supervisors will also allocate a mark, based on the process of proposal development,

and how you have incorporated and addressed the feedback received on assignments.

Even though the requirements for proposal presentations may differ from department to

department, the following broad outline may be followed when preparing for your

presentation:

Five minute presentation on your proposed study (addressing the what, why and

how questions)

Three minute presentation on how you have incorporated the comments and

feedback on Assignments 1, 2 and 3 into the final proposal.

15

SCHEDULE, DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATORS AND PRESCRIBED READINGS 7.4 SCHEDULE

DATE TIME TOPIC PRESENTER

PRE-REGISTRATION

NOVEMBER

2015

THEME 1: GETTING STARTED

DETERMINED BY

DEPARTMENT

INTRODUCTION TO NMQ800

PURPOSE AND OUTLINE OF THE

MODULE

DEPARTMENTAL

NMQ

COORDINATOR

STRUCTURE OF THE RESEARCH

PROPOSAL

EXAMPLES OF PROPOSALS

PURPOSE AND FORMAT OF

PROPOSAL

PRESENTATIONS IN 2017

INTRODUCTION TO THE

LITERATURE REVIEW

PREPARATION FOR ASSIGNMENT

1

(DRAFT DUE 30 JANUARY 2017,

FINAL SUBMISSION 5

FEBRUARY 2017)

AS ARRANGED WITH

SUPERVISOR

DETERMINING A PRELIMINARY

RESEARCH FOCUS AND

RESEARCH QUESTIONS SUPERVISORS

IDENTIFYING LITERATURE TO

CONSULT AS A START

POST-REGISTRATION CONTACT SESSIONS:

28 JANUARY

THEME 2: LITERATURE REVIEW, THEORETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL

FRAMEWORKS

16

08H30 – 10H00

ACADEMIC READING

ACADEMIC WRITING AND

ARGUMENTATION

PROF R EVANS

10H00 – 11H00 REFERENCING

PLAGIARISM AND TURNITIN PROF R EVANS

11H30 – 12H30 LITERATURE REVIEW PROF B FRASER

12H30 – 13H30 LUNCH

13H30 – 14H30 THEORETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL

FRAMEWORKS PROF B FRASER

14H30 – 15H30 REVISITING RESEARCH

QUESTIONS

DISCUSSION OF ASSIGNMENT 1,

DUE

5 FEBRUARY (PATHWAY 1) OR

26 FEBRUARY (PATHWAY 2)

INTRODUCTION TO ASSIGNMENT

2

PROF R FERREIRA

5 FEBRUARY PATHWAY 1 STUDENTS:

SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT 1 TO DEPARTMENTAL NMQ COORDINATORS

18 FEBRUARY

CONTACT SESSION: THEME 3: THE NATURE OF INQUIRY

08H30 – 09H30 INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH

PARADIGMS DR M SEFOTHO

09H30 – 11H00 EPISTEMOLOGICAL PARADIGMS IN

EDUCATION RESEARCH DR M SEFOTHO

11H30 – 12H30 METHODOLOGICAL PARADIGMS IN

EDUCATION RESEARCH DR M SEFOTHO

12H30 – 13H30 LUNCH

13H30 – 15H00 RESEARCH DESIGNS TBA

15H00 – 15H30 DISCUSSION OF ASSIGNMENT 2, DUE

26 FEBRUARY (PATHWAY 1) OR

25 MARCH (PATHWAY 2)

INTRODUCTION TO ASSIGNMENT 3

TBA

17

26 FEBRUARY

PATHWAY 1 STUDENTS:


PATHWAY 2 STUDENTS:


18 MARCH

(PREPARATION FOR

ASSIGNMENT

3)

THEME 4: DATA COLLECTION, DOCUMENTATION AND ANALYSIS

08H30 – 11H30

DATA COLLECTION AND

DOCUMENTATION:

QUANTITATIVE

QUALITATIVE

MIXED-METHODS

PARTICIPATORY

TBA

11H30 – 12H00 DISCUSSION OF ASSIGNMENT 3, DUE

18 MARCH (PATHWAY 1) OR

22 APRIL (PATHWAY 2)

TBA

12H00 – 13H00 LUNCH

13H00 – 15H30

DATA ANALYSIS:

QUANTITATIVE

QUALITATIVE

MIXED-METHODS

PARTICIPATORY

TBA

18 MARCH PATHWAY 1 STUDENTS:


25 MARCH PATHWAY 2 STUDENTS:


22 APRIL PATHWAY 2 STUDENTS:


7.5 DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATORS

Please be reminded that your supervisor should be the first person to contact if you have

questions about your study. In addition to your supervisor, each department has a coordinator

who can be contacted for general questions on assignments, submission dates or places,

proposal presentations, etc., as listed below. For general enquiries about the NMQ 800 module

18

Dr A Engelbrecht (Aldoel Building 1-122, Tel 012 420 5529 or [email protected]) can

be contacted. All administrative enquiries, such as registration information, are dealt with by

Faculty Administration.

Department Contact Person Office Telephone

number

E-mail

Educational

Psychology

Dr Funke Omidire Aldoel 2-52 420 5656 [email protected]

Science,

Mathematics and

Technology

Education

Dr Batseba Mofolo-

Mbokane

Natural

Sciences 4-1

420 3088 batseba.mofolo-

[email protected]

7.6 LECTURERS/PRESENTERS

Information on the lecturers involved in NMQ 800 contact sessions are included in the table

below. If you wish to make an appointment with any of these lecturers please do so via e-mail

well in advance.

Lecturer/Presenter Office Tel.

number

E-mail

Prof Rinelle Evans Aldoel 3-43 420 4272 [email protected]

Prof Billy Fraser Nat Science 4-2 420 2207 [email protected]

Dr Maximus Sefotho Aldoel 2-55 420 2772 [email protected]

Dr Surette van Staden Nat Science 4-19 420 5159 [email protected]

7.7 PRESCRIBED AND RECOMMENDED READINGS

Your respective lecturers, as well as your supervisor may provide additional material over and

above the titles listed below. Some material may also be posted on ClickUP.

It is recommended that you purchase one of the following texts:

Maree, J.G. (Ed.) 2012. Complete Your Thesis or Dissertation Successfully: Practical Guidelines.

Pretoria: Juta.

or









19

Joubert, I., Hartell, C. and Lombard, K. (Eds) 2015. Navorsing: ‘n Gids vir die beginner navorser.

Pretoria: van Schaik.

The following readings may also serve as a solid foundation for understanding research

in educational context. Please note that students are not required to purchase these

sources. This is NOT an exhaustive list!

Briggs A.R.J., Coleman M. & Morrison, M. 2012. Research methods in educational leadership

and management. Los Angeles; London: Sage Publications.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. 2007. Research methods in Education. London, New York:

Routledge Falmer. (An electronic book is available on line – check library catalogue)

Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches

(2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. 2007. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative

and qualitative research (3rd Edition). Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall.

Flick, U. 2011. Introducing research methodology: a beginner's guide to doing a research project.

Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.

Maree, K. (Ed). 2007. First steps in research. Van Schaik Publishers.

Punch, K. 2009. Introduction to research methods in education. Los Angeles, London: Sage

Publications.

Thomas, G. 2009. How to do your research project: a guide for students in education and applied

social sciences. Los Angeles [i.e. Thousand Oaks, Calif.]: Sage Publications.

20

7.8 NMQ 800 ASSIGNMENTS

ASSIGNMENT 1 First steps in your research proposal

Submission of Assignment 1 To supervisor (1st draft): Friday 6 January 2017

To NMQ800 coordinator: 3 February 2017

Overview of the assignment

For this assignment you will formulate a statement of purpose and then refine your focus by

formulating a primary research question, and related secondary questions. However, you will first

have to review existing literature in the area of your research topic. You may not find the exact

research topic but you will find related articles that will help you understand the area you are

researching and provide an overview of other research in the field. For the last part of the

assignment you need to identify a theoretical or conceptual framework for your study, which will

guide you in undertaking the study and interpreting the results you obtain. Therefore, the purpose

of this assignment is to deepen your understanding of how to conduct a literature review,

formulate an initial research question, and select a suitable theoretical or conceptual framework.

You should meet with your supervisor before starting with the assignment or a literature search.

For the assignment, you thus need to complete Questions 1 to 5, in consultation with your

supervisor. It is important to attend to your writing style and line of argumentation. Kindly keep in

mind that your supervisor needs to sign off on your assignment before submission, and plan

accordingly.

Submit a well-structured, neatly edited assignment, consisting of narrative text. Please staple or

ring bind the document. You need not only print on one side of the page. Please number the

pages.

21

Question 1 Critical analysis of articles

Select two readings (unless otherwise specified by your supervisor) from peer-reviewed research

journal articles. Use the analysis sheet provided below to guide your reading. Retype or copy the

analysis sheet and complete it for the two articles. As you progress with your literature review,

you will find this to have been a useful exercise to help you keep track of your readings.

Analysis of research article

Full reference:

Read on:

Comments:

What is the problem statement?

What is the main research question/focus of the article?

How is the study contextualized in prior knowledge/

research on the topic?

What is the theoretical foundation of the research?

What method or procedures were used to carry out the

research?

What justification is provided for the particular choice of

research method?

How have ethical considerations been dealt with?

What is the rationale for the study or for writing the article?

What is the main finding/conclusion?

Are there implications of the results – for policy, practice or

further research?

Does the article communicate clearly? If not, indicate why.

Write down a question you wish to ask the author.

Compiled by Professor Ailie Cleghorn, for ESTU615 offered by Concordia University,

Montreal, Canada

22

Question 2 Formulating a research question

In a narrative style, describe in 150-200 words WHAT you would like to research (your

research focus), WHY (your research problem or rationale), WHERE (your research site),

WITH WHOM (your research participants), and HOW (your methodology)?

Formulate one primary research question for your study based on the readings and gaps

you have identified in existing literature.

Formulate no more than five appropriate secondary/sub research questions.

Question 3 Literature review

Consult at least 15 scientific sources on the topic of your research, being guided by the analysis

exercise you completed for Question 1, your formulated research questions (Question 2) and

discussions with your supervisor. Write at least four pages on the key aspects of your research,

demonstrating your insight into the main trends, findings and gaps in existing literature in this

field.

Question 4 Theoretical or conceptual framework

Based on your literature review, formulated research questions and discussions with your

supervisor, select a theoretical framework or compile a conceptual framework for your study.

Provide and explain the selected framework, and discuss your reasons for selecting this specific

framework, as well as the way in which it will guide your study. You may want to consult your

supervisor for guidance in this area of the proposal.

Question 5 Compiling a reference list

Compile a reference list of the sources you have consulted for the literature review. Ensure that

you adhere to the appropriate referencing style (APA or Harvard system) and pay meticulous

attention to accuracy. Ensure that you use the correct way of referencing in-text as well, in order

to avoid plagiarism.

23

ASSIGNMENT 2 Paradigmatic approach and research design

Submission of Assignment 2 To supervisor (1st draft): Friday 10 Febr 2017

To NMQ800 coordinator: 24 February 2017



pages.

Please submit Assignment 1 with this assignment to enable the assessors to form a

complete picture of the emerging proposal.

Question 1 Epistemology of the study

Discuss the epistemology of your proposed study. After explaining your understanding of the

selected paradigm, justify your choice in terms of the potential value and advantages it holds for

your specific study. Identify potential challenges you may face based on this choice and present

strategies you may utilise to overcome these challenges. Also remember to identify the key

assumptions of the paradigm, as it relates to epistemology.

Question 2 Methodological approach

Discuss the methodological approach of your proposed study (in terms of e.g. a qualitative,

quantitative, mixed methods or participatory approach). After explaining your understanding of

the selected approach, justify your choice in terms of the potential value and advantages it holds

for your specific study. Identify potential challenges you may face based on this choice and

present strategies you may utilise to overcome these challenges.

Question 3 Research design

Select a research design (e.g. survey research, case study, ethnography, experimental etc.).

After explaining your understanding of the design, justify your choice in terms of the potential

value and advantages it holds for your specific study. Identify potential challenges you may face

based on this choice and present strategies you may utilise to overcome these challenges.

24

ASSIGNMENT 3 Data collection, documentation and analysis

Submission of Assignment 3 To supervisor (1st draft): Friday 3 March 2017

To NMQ800 coordinator: 17 March 2017



pages.

Please submit Assignments 1 and 2 with this assignment to enable the assessors to form

a complete picture of the emerging proposal.

Question 1 Data collection and documentation

Develop and discuss a data collection and documentation plan for your study. Indicate which

information each data source will provide and how it will help address the research question(s).

You may discuss this plan in narrative form and/or support it visually in table format. Discuss the

sampling, various data collection and data documentation strategies by explaining your

understanding of each, justifying your choices against the background of the focus of your study,

presenting the value/advantages of the strategies for your study and discussing potential

challenges you may face when collecting and documenting data.

Question 2 Data analysis

Discuss the proposed data analysis plan for your study. Explain the rationale for your choice.

Furthermore, discuss the suitability of your choice in terms of the data you intend to gather and

indicate potential challenges you may face when analysing the data. Also indicate how you will

circumvent/address these potential challenges.

Question 3 Validity and reliability / trustworthiness

Explain the strategies that you will employ to ensure validity and reliability (quantitative research)

or trustworthiness (qualitative research) of your study.

Question 4 Ethical considerations

Discuss the ethical considerations pertinent to your study.

25

PROPOSAL PRESENTATIONS STARTS IN APRIL 2017 (Exact date to be announced).

7.9. GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSMENT

ASSESSMENT OF ASSIGNMENTS

The following grading rubric will be used for assessing your responses to extended narrative

questions included in Assignments 1, 2 and 3:

Excellent Good Needs Improvement

Poor 0

Overall impression

Student directly addresses main question or issue, add new insight into the subject beyond the class discussion and the required reading and is able to synthesize this knowledge in new ways.

Student addresses main question or issue, but does not add much new insight into the subject beyond the class discussion and the required reading.

Student attempts to address main question or issue, but fails. Superficial/limited reading.

Student does NOT address main question or issue, and has not engaged with the literature. P

LA

GIA

RIS

M

Use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose

Communicates, organizes and synthesizes information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches the specific purpose with clarity and depth.

Well-structured essay, coherent and logically flow.

Communicates, organizes and presents in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches. Intended purpose is achieved.

Good structure according to themes.

Communicates and organizes information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches sources. The information is not yet synthesized, so the intended purpose is not fully achieved.

Communicates information from sources. The information is fragmented and/or used inappropriately (misquoted, taken out of context, or incorrectly paraphrased, etc.), so the intended purpose is not achieved.

Use information ethically and legally

Follows style guide conventions correctly.

Citations are mostly complete and accurate.

Use references, paraphrasing and quotation adequately.

Follows style guide conventions with few errors.

Citations have partially correct information.

Use references, paraphrasing and quotation with errors (inconsistent).

Follows style guide conventions with errors.

Citations have partially correct information or not included.

Use references, paraphrasing and quotation with errors or not at all.

Does not follow style guide conventions.

Citations and references are not included.

26

The following grading rubric will be used for assessing Assignment 1

Assessment rubric for assignment 1 Name: …………………………………………. Student number: ……………………………… Date submitted: ……………………………… Date returned: ………………………………….

Question 1 Critical analysis of 2 articles

Descriptors

Mark allocation 3= Outcome exceeded 2 = Acceptable 1= Inadequate

Have two analyses been submitted? 1

Is the critique/summary/description rich or lean? 1

Are the sources chosen relevant to the field of interest? 1

Are the comments helpful for future reference? 1

To what extent have these descriptors been identified correctly in the generic article?

Problem statement 3 2 1

Main research question/focus of the article 3 2 1

Contextualisation of the study 3 2 1

Theoretical foundation of the research 3 2 1

Method or procedures used to conduct the research 3 2 1

Justification the particular choice of research method 3 2 1

Ethical considerations 3 2 1

Rationale for the study or for writing the article 3 2 1

What is the main finding/conclusion? 3 2 1

Implications of the results – for policy, practice or further research 3 2 1

Justification for clear communication or not 3 2 1

Formulation and relevance of question for author 3 2 1

Total 40

Question 2 Formulation of research questions

Descriptors Mark allocation

Do the questions relate to the statement of purpose? Is there a logical link between the questions? Is a conceptual link between questions evident? Can each questions stand on its own as a researchable question? Is the formulation clear/simple/concise? .

10

Question 3 Literature Review

Does the initial literature review by critically evaluates the sources cited and structures a coherent narrative of the readings that outline the major trends and critical issues related to research focus. Does it is answer the question: What is known about my chosen question? Does the review identify the gap in the literature?

30

Question 4 Theoretical of conceptual framework

Is the theoretical framework or conceptual framework appropriate for the study?

10

Question 5 Compilation of an accurate reference list

Descriptors Mark allocation

One mark per correct reference 10

TOTAL 100

27


Assessment rubric for assignment 2

Name: …………………………………………. Student number: ………………………………

Date submitted: ……………………………… Date returned: ………………………………….

Descriptors/criteria Mark allocation

Epistemology/meta-theory: Relevant choice? Has a justification of the

choice been provided? Adequate explanation? Integration of multiple

sources? Does candidate display evidence of understanding the paradigm?

Have key assumptions been highlighted? A critical discussion of the

potential value, advantages and application of chosen stance as well as

challenges of the selected epistemological paradigm has been provided.

20

Methodological Paradigm: Relevant choice? Has a justification of the

choice been provided? Adequate explanation? Integration of multiple

sources? Does candidate display evidence of understanding the

methodological paradigm? Has the candidate discussed the potential value

and advantages it holds for the specific study? Has the candidate identified

the potential challenges that may be faced based on this choice and

strategies that may be used to overcome these challenges?

20

Research design: Relevant choice? Has a justification of the choice been

provided? Adequate explanation? Integration of multiple sources? Does

candidate display evidence of understanding the design? Have key

assumptions been highlighted? A critical discussion of the potential value,

advantages and application of selected methodology as well as the potential

challenges it may pose has been provided.

30

Selection of research method: Appropriately identified for study? Evidence

of solid grasp of method based on background reading? Carefully explained?

Adequate justification of choice?

10

Language usage: Degree of competence? Academic tone? Own words?

Grammatical accuracy? Appropriate vocabulary? Linking? Signposting?

10

Academic conventions and technical quality: Task brief well executed?

Accurate and consistent numbering and spacing? Appropriate choice of font

style and size? Neat/professional presentation? Used correctly? In-text

referencing varies? Pages numbered? Correct reference list.

10

Total 100

28


Assessment rubric for assignment 3

Name: …………………………………………. Student number: ………………………………

Date submitted: ……………………………… Date returned: ………………………………….

Descriptors/criteria Mark allocation

Description of sample/participants and site: Are the descriptions of the

participants/respondents/research site(s) sufficiently detailed? Are

selection/sampling criteria clear?

15

Explanation of data collection and documentation strategies: Has the

process of data collection and documentation been sufficiently described? Is

the rationale for the choice of instruments clear? Have potential challenges

been highlighted? Have suggestions for circumvention of challenges been

made? Are proposed instruments/protocols feasible? Are the collection

strategies feasible/sufficient? Has the candidate critically evaluated the

potential value, advantages and application of these instruments and

strategies as well as the potential challenges any of them may pose? Is this

project executable within the parameters of a Masters?

15

Alignment of data collection strategy with research questions: Is the

explanation clear and sufficiently detailed? Will the instruments provide

appropriate data to answer the research questions? Does the table support

the narrative adequately?

15

Data analysis: Has the proposed data analysis plan for the study been

discussed. Has the candidate explained the rationale for the choice? Has the

candidate indicated potential challenges in data analysis and how to address

these?

15

Validity and Reliability / Quality Criteria: Has the candidate explained the

strategies that will be employed to ensure validity and reliability (quantitative

research) or Quality Criteria (qualitative research) of the study.

10

Ethical considerations: Does the candidate provide sufficient evidence of

understanding the required ethical considerations? Does the candidate

display insight into the ethical matters applicable to the study? Have these

been clearly explained?

10

Language usage: Degree of competence? Academic tone? Own words?

Grammatical accuracy? Appropriate vocabulary? Linking? Signposting?

10

Academic conventions and technical quality: Task brief well executed?

Accurate and consistent numbering and spacing? Appropriate choice of font

style and size? Neat/professional presentation? Used correctly? In-text

referencing varies? Pages numbered? Correct reference list.

10

Total 100

29

ASSESSMENT OF RESEARCH PROPOSAL

The outline below can be used as guideline when finalising your 10 to 12 page proposal (1½ line

spacing) for submission, before presenting the proposal to the department. It will be your

responsibility to reduce your initial assignments to meet these guidelines, in consultation with

your supervisor.

SECTION

GUIDELINE IN TERMS OF PAGES

1 Introduction and rationale 1½ pages

2 Initial literature review Maximum 2 pages

3 Purpose of the study ½ page

4 Research questions ½ page

5 Hypotheses/Working assumptions ½ page

6 Concept clarification 1 page

7 Theoretical/Conceptual framework ½ to 1 page

8 Paradigmatic perspective ½ to 1 page

9

Research methodology: 9.1 Research design 9.2 Selection of participants 9.3 Data collection and documentation 9.4 Data analysis and interpretation

½ page ½ page 1 to 1½ page ½ page

10 Ethical considerations ½ page – only if there is sensitivity involved

11 List of references

When assessing the final proposal the critical readers and supervisor will use the

assessment form2 included below.

2 Originally developed by Prof C Lubbe-De Beer, Dr S Human Vogel and Dr R Mampane.

30

Name of student: ____________________

Student number: ____________________

Date of presentation: _____________________

Name and signature of assessor/critical reader: ______________________________

Name and signature of chair of defense committee: ___________________________

RESEARCH PROPOSAL Accomplished

8-10

Emergent

4-7

Developing

1-3

STRUCTURE

Introduction and rationale

The introduction is brief and relevant, and gives a clear indication of the topic of the study.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Background includes appropriate references to the theoretical literature.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

The problem statement is well-formulated as opposed to vague, irrelevant or absent.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

The rationale is clear and relevant as opposed to absent/vague/irrelevant.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Purpose statement

The proposal contains a purpose statement. 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

The purpose statement is linked to the rationale of the study.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Research questions

The proposal contains a research question and sub-questions where appropriate and is aligned with the title and purpose of the study.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Theoretical and/or personal assumptions have been outlined.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Literature study

The literature study is written in a logical way and identifies key issues and trends in the subject.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

The literature study includes an appropriate range of sources (national and international).

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Theoretical framework

Theoretical / conceptual framework is presented and is appropriate for the study.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

RESEARCH DESIGN

A paradigm is selected and described briefly. Relevant scholars/ references indicated for paradigm.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

The overall research design is appropriate for the study and has been clearly described for this study.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Methodology (eg qualitative or quantitative) has been described.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

31

Sampling

Sampling strategy has been adequately described. 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

The appropriate sample / population / participants and selection criteria have been identified and described.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Data collection

Data collection methods are described adequately, including the rationale, the advantages and disadvantages for using these in this study.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Data collection procedures are described clearly. 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Ethical implications of data collection strategies (such as vulnerable populations) have been outlined.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Data analysis

Data analysis procedures, including

rationale/advantages and limitations, are described

(theory).

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Data analysis procedures are appropriate / relevant

(application). 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Methodological norms

Methodological norms have been described, consistent

with their design. 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

SCHOLARLY WRITING

The candidate writes in a scholarly manner by using

his/her own words, appropriate academic terms and

avoids colloquial expressions.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

The writing has a logical flow. 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

The candidate uses the appropriate language and

structure for formulating an argument. The candidate’s

arguments are persuasive.

10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

TECHNICAL SKILLS

The candidate uses in-text references correctly and

appropriately. 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

The language in the report is error-free. 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

The list of references is complete and correct. 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

There is an appropriate balance between book and

journal citations 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Citations are recent and consist mostly of peer-

reviewed sources. 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

PROPOSAL DEFENCE

Did the candidate present a well prepared, logical

presentation? 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Did the candidate speak clearly, using appropriate

facial expressions and gestures? 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Was the presentation visually appealing, used

effectively and visible to all? 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Was the candidate’s appearance and dress code

appropriate for the occasion? 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Did the candidate keep to the time limit? 10 / 9 / 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 3 / 2 / 1

Total Maximum: 350 (To be converted to a percentage)

An introduction to advanced research, theory and methods in … · 2017-01-13 · NMQ 800 is a...

Documents

Transcript of An introduction to advanced research, theory and methods in … · 2017-01-13 · NMQ 800 is a...