Altmetrics: Listening & Giving Voice to Ideas with Social Media Data
-
Upload
anatoliy-gruzd -
Category
Data & Analytics
-
view
465 -
download
0
Transcript of Altmetrics: Listening & Giving Voice to Ideas with Social Media Data
Altmetrics: Listening & Giving Voice to Ideas with Social Media Data
Anatoliy Gruzd, PhDCanada Research Chair and Associate Professor Director of Research, Social Media LabRyerson University, Toronto, Canada @[email protected]
Should scholarly use of social media be considered towards tenure and/or promotion?
Gruzd, A., Staves, K., and Wilk, A. (2011). Tenure and Promotion in the Age of Online Social Media.
Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T) Conference.
Back in 2011 …
Scholarly Communication: Then and NowLetters of Edwin Gilpin, a mining engineer, government official & author (1850-1907)
Tweets of a contemporary scientist in the domain of Earth Sciences (2014)
MacDonald, B., Duggan, L., Gruzd, A, & Collins, V., Scientific Communication: Testing Historical & Present-Day Communication Networks with Social Network Analysis. Working paper.
9 months | 1300 letters | people=616 | ties=1277 1 month | 1302 tweets | people=756 | ties=1578
Popular Social Media Sites among Academics
Frequent Use
Non-academic soc.networks Blogs
Online document
management
Media repositories Wikis
Occasional Use
Presentation sharing sites
Video/teleconference Blog Wikis Academic
soc.networks
Gruzd, A., & Goertzen, M. (2013). Wired Academia: Why Social Science Scholars Are Using Social Media. The 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS): 3332-3341, DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2013.614
Benefits of Using Social Media
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Discovering new fundingGarnering mass media attention
Publishing findingsMaintaining professional image
Soliciting advice from peersCollaborating with other researchers
Making new research contactsPromoting current work/research
Discovering new ideas or publicationsFollowing other researchers' work
Keeping up to date with topics
Gruzd, A., & Goertzen, M. (2013). Wired Academia: Why Social Science Scholars Are Using Social Media. The 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS): 3332-3341, DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2013.614
Related benefits of social media use based on the factor analysis
Social & Info Dissemination
Information Gathering
Collaboration explains 24% of the total variance
explains 16% of the total variance
Who talks about research on social media?
• Not just academics! But also • institutions • journalists• librarians• policy makers • other groups
As more people talk about research online, social ‘signals’ are becoming more valuable for …
• Academics – discover what peers are discussing
• Institutions & Funders –assess research impact
• Publishers - ↑readership, feature most-discussed research, discover popular topics for future calls
• ATP Committees – evaluate scholarly output / service-component
Google Trends for “Altmetrics” and “Altmetric”
Altmetrics is …
A set of “metrics proposed as an alternative to the widely used journal impact factor and personal citation
indices, like the h-index” (Wikipedia)
“Study and use of scholarly impact measures based on activity in online
tools and environments” (Priem, 2014)
“The creation and study of new metrics based on the Social Web for analyzing
and informing scholarship” (Adie & Roe, 2013)
Research on Altmetrics is growing… but still very young
Top 10 most prolific scholars in this area
Source: Web of Science, Sep 2017
Altmetrics: Research Topics
Common research questions:
• To what extent articles published in a journal are discussed on social media (coverage)?
• Is there a relationship between altmetricsand more traditional impact factors (correlation studies)?
Ex: among altmetrics, blog count is the strongest predictor of increased citations:
• “One more blog post discussing a publication increases the chance of more citations by 4.7%” (Hassan et al., 2017)
• Very discipline specific
• Recent review paper: Sugimoto et al., 2017
Altmetrics: Data Providers
Twitter68%
Facebook17%
Blogs7%
News6%
Google+2%
% COVERAGE OF PUBLICATIONS IN SOCIAL MEDIA
* Based on ~1M articles published between2011-2015 (indexed by Scopus) and that have atleast one citation & one social media mention(captured up until Feb 2017)(Hassan et al., 2017)
Altmetrics: Data ProvidersLack of APIs for some prominent SN platforms
Researchgate.net Academia.edu
Altmetrics: Data ProvidersLack of attention to some other SN platforms
(Kumar et al., 2018)
Content Type n=1,227 posts (100%)
Explanation 592 (48%)Information Seeking 274 (22%)Providing Resources 260 (21%)Socializing with Positive Intent 204 (17%)Explanation with Disagreement 71 (6%)Subreddit Rules and Norms 66 (5%)Explanation with Agreement 45 (4%)Socializing with Negative Intent 4 (0%)
NISO Alternative Assessment Projecthttp://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/document.php?document_id=17090
transparency
replicability
accuracy
Altmetrics: Data Aggregators
NISO Alternative Assessment Projecthttp://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/document.php?document_id=17090
Altmetrics: Data Aggregators
Altmetrics: Metrics Examples based on a case study of measuring impact of a drug safety article published by the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES)with Gamble, Traynor, Gruzd, Mai, Dormuth, Sketris
Basic Indicators
Altmetrics: Metrics Example
Who tweeted about the CNODES paper?
Twitter user type # users % users
Members of the public 22 84%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) 3 11%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) 1 3%
Account Type Twitter Account
Organization @bcdpicOrganization @action_designerOrganization @e24BusinessIndividual @social_club_Individual @SrinjoyOrganization @connectcontactsOrganization @StartupPortalIndividual @kekesimotOrganization @youngentre
Source: Altrmetric.com
Altmetrics: Developing Metrics based on Social Network Analysis (SNA)
Nodes = Social Media Users
Ties (lines) = Interactions
• ~10% of the 3,005 blogs analyzed cite at least 1 article from the dataset of 2,246 articles. • The most influential blogs, as measured by in-links, are written by diabetes patients and tend not to cite biomedical literature.
Gruzd, A., Black, F.A., Le, Y., Amos, K. (2012). Investigating Biomedical Research Literature in the Blogosphere: A Case Study of Diabetes and HbA1c. Journal of the Medical Library Association 100(1): 34-42. DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.100.1.007
The Rise of Social Bots• Who are we studying:
Humans or Bots?
Social Bot – software designed to act on the Internet with some level of autonomy
Altmetrics: Metrics - Challenges
Different Types of Bots
Free music, games, books,
downloads
Jewelery, electronics,
vehicles
Contest, gambling,
prizes
Finance, loans, realty
Increase Twitter
following
DietAdult
(Grier et al, 2010)
Detecting Bots…
Phot
o • Color & Edge histograms
• Color & Edge Directivity Descriptor (CEDD)
• Image Similarity
Mes
sage • Sensitive
words• URL• Duplicates • #hashtags• @replies
Post
er • Username• Engagement
level• Creation
date
Soci
al N
etw
ork • # Friends
• # Following• In/out degree
centrality • Clustering
(Yardi et al, ‘09; Grier et al, ‘10; Wang, ‘10; Jin et al, ’11; Varol et al, ‘17)
How to introduce these emerging techniques to altmetrics researchers and developers who are relying on social media as their go-to data source!
The challenge is ...
© Chris Allen licensed under Creative Commons
Altmetrics: Challenges & Opportunities!
• Lack of access to some data providers
• Mostly tracking social mentions based on DOIs/unique identifiers
• Reliance on different data providers
• Measuring different things
• Need for transparency, replicability & accuracy
• Noisy data and social bots
Altmetrics: Listening & Giving Voice to Ideas with Social Media Data
Anatoliy Gruzd, PhDCanada Research Chair and Associate Professor Director of Research, Social Media LabRyerson University, Toronto, Canada @[email protected]
Slides available at http://bit.ly/4amkey
References• Grier, C., Thomas, K., Paxson, V., & Zhang, M. (2010). @spam: the underground on 140 characters or less (p. 27). ACM Press.
http://doi.org/10.1145/1866307.1866311• Gruzd, A., Black, F.A., Le, Y., Amos, K. (2012). Investigating Biomedical Research Literature in the Blogosphere: A Case Study of Diabetes and
HbA1c. Journal of the Medical Library Association 100(1): 34-42. DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.100.1.007• Gruzd, A., Staves, K., and Wilk, A. (2011). Tenure and Promotion in the Age of Online Social Media. Proceedings of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T) Conference.• Gurajala, S., White, J. S., Hudson, B., Voter, B. R., & Matthews, J. N. (2016). Profile characteristics of fake Twitter accounts. Big Data &
Society, 3(2), 2053951716674236.• Hassan, S. U., Imran, M., Gillani, U., Aljohani, N. R., Bowman, T. D., & Didegah, F. (2017). Measuring social media activity of scientific
literature: an exhaustive comparison of scopus and novel altmetrics big data. Scientometrics, 1-21.• Kumar, P., Gruzd, A., Haythornthwaite, C., Gilbert, S., Esteve Del Valle, M., Paulin, D. (2018). Social Media in Educational Practice: Faculty
Present and Future Use of Social Media in Teaching. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.• MacDonald, B., Duggan, L., Gruzd, A, & Collins, V., Scientific Communication: Testing Historical & Present-Day Communication Networks
with Social Network Analysis. Working paper. • Melero, R. (2015). Altmetrics–a complement to conventional metrics. Biochemia medica, 25(2), 152-160.• Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: a review of the literature. Journal
of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037-2062.• Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Davis, C. A., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2017). Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and
characterization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.03107. • Wang, A. H. (2010). Don’t follow me: Spam detection in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Security and
Cryptography (SECRYPT) (pp. 1–10). IEEE.