Agile power of place

94
harnessing the power of place. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTS TO SUPPORT Agile Teams

description

 

Transcript of Agile power of place

Page 1: Agile power of place

harnessing the power of place.

PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTS TO SUPPORT

Agile Teams

Page 2: Agile power of place

hi there.

ROSHELLE RITZENTHALERDESIGN STRATEGIST, [email protected]@RoRitzen

JORGEN HESSELBERGDIRECTOR, AGILE ENTERPRISE [email protected]@JHesselberg

Page 3: Agile power of place

communicate

collaborate engage

agile

GOING AGILE

Page 4: Agile power of place

communicate

collaborate engage

TODAY

@

Page 5: Agile power of place

communicate

collaborate engage

TODAYTOMORROW

@

Page 6: Agile power of place

communicate

collaborate engage

TODAYTOMORROW

@

Page 7: Agile power of place

communicate

collaborate

engage

TODAYTOMORROW

@

Page 8: Agile power of place

BUT HOW DO WE GET FROM STANDARD...

@

Page 9: Agile power of place

@

...TO AGILE?

Page 10: Agile power of place

HOW DOES SPACE FOSTER AGILITY?

Page 11: Agile power of place
Page 12: Agile power of place
Page 13: Agile power of place

12 Gensler 2008 Workplace Survey / United States / Working Differently 13Gensler 2008 Workplace Survey / United States / Working Differently

LEARNING IS FAR MORE IMPORTANT TO TOP COMPANIESCompared to average companies, top-performing compa-nies consider learning 80% more critical to job success, and spend 40% more time in this work mode.

TOP-PERFORMING COMPANIES VALUE SOCIALIZINGOverturning the notion that socializing is a time-waster rather than a business asset, top-performing companies socialize 16% more than average companies. Further, they consider it almost three times more critical than average companies, the largest gap among all of the work mode comparisons.

80% more critical

185% more critical

Top-performing Companies Average Companies

Top-performing Companies Average Companies

CRITICALITY

CRITICALITY CRITICALITY

SOCIALIZING MODE

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

50%

41%

COLLABORATION MODE

FOCUS MODE

36%

20%

LEARNING MODE

20%

7%

21%

43%

TIME SPENT

CRITICALITY

CRITICALITY CRITICALITY

SOCIALIZING MODE

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

50%

41%

COLLABORATION MODE

FOCUS MODE

36%

20%

LEARNING MODE

20%

7%

21%

43%

TIME SPENT

These findings provide insight into the complex equation of what creates value in a knowledge economy: work can be improved through the right proportion of four work modes, and in top-performing companies, even greater economic value

is derived from collaboration, learning, and socializing. People believe that better design of their workplace would help them be more productive, whether the work involves focus, collaboration, learning or socializing.

AVERAGE COMPANIES ARE CENTERED ON FOCUS WORKAverage companies spend half of their work week in focus mode—21% more than top companies, even though on average they rank it less critical to their job performance. Average companies may recognize the disparity between what they are doing and what could create value—but they are not harnessing the performance potential of the work modes that distinguish market leaders.

Respondents from all companies projected that better work spaces would yield significant improvement for their perfor-mance of each work mode: 28% improvement in focus, 27% in collaboration, 27% in learning, and 23% in socializing.

This establishes the equal importance of improving spaces for focus, collaboration, learning and socializing to improve employee job performance.

IMPROVING WORK MODE PERFORMANCE

TOP COMPANIES COLLABORATE MORE Top-performing companies spend 23% more time collaborating than average companies and consider collaboration more than twice as critical to job success .

Top-performing Companies Average Companies

104% more critical

21% more time

Top-performing Companies Average Companies

CRITICALITY

CRITICALITY CRITICALITY

SOCIALIZING MODE

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

50%

41%

COLLABORATION MODE

FOCUS MODE

36%

20%

LEARNING MODE

20%

7%

21%

43%

TIME SPENT

CRITICALITY

CRITICALITY CRITICALITY

SOCIALIZING MODE

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

50%

41%

COLLABORATION MODE

FOCUS MODE

36%

20%

LEARNING MODE

20%

7%

21%

43%

TIME SPENT

Page 14: Agile power of place

Investmentspace

Page 15: Agile power of place
Page 16: Agile power of place

Workplace Betaspace

Page 17: Agile power of place

Microsof t started in Bill Gates' garage. His high-school friend Paul convinced him to drop out of Harvard to start the company. They moved to Arizona and wrote a BASIC programming language for Altair computers out of Bill's garage.

Page 18: Agile power of place
Page 19: Agile power of place

Speed Transparency Flexibility Alternative Work Modes

Page 20: Agile power of place

COWORKING

Page 21: Agile power of place
Page 22: Agile power of place

…instead, we are learning from this movement in order to apply their successes to larger companies seeking to promote innovation and recruit or retain talent.

We are learning from this movement in order to draw on the energy and success of start-ups in larger more established corporations seeking to promote innovation and recruit and retain top talent.

Page 23: Agile power of place

COWORKING principles respond to a new generation of work.

Page 24: Agile power of place

Values

Page 25: Agile power of place
Page 26: Agile power of place

AUTHENTIC

Page 27: Agile power of place
Page 28: Agile power of place
Page 29: Agile power of place
Page 30: Agile power of place

Space

Page 31: Agile power of place

AUTHENTIC

Page 32: Agile power of place

AUTHENTIC HUB Brussels - 350 members

Page 33: Agile power of place

AUTHENTIC ROCKETSPACE - 31 startups - 15,000 sq.ft.

Page 34: Agile power of place

This is a global phenomenon, with fairly identified user expectations of space and technology requirements.

Early Research Findings

Page 35: Agile power of place

“Office is a state of mind”

Early Research Findings

Page 36: Agile power of place

In these spaces, every space is a “group” space. Collaboration defines the interactions in the environment.

Early Research Findings

Page 37: Agile power of place

87% of coworkers have started new projects with other coworkers they met in their space.

Page 38: Agile power of place

Evidence suggests that the specific characteristics of coworker behavior foreshadows changes in corporate work.

Early Research Findings

Page 39: Agile power of place

Sharing Openness Co-creation

Page 40: Agile power of place

…delivers accelerated serendipity. If we are around interesting people, interesting things usually happen.

Page 41: Agile power of place

How did Nokia do it?

Page 42: Agile power of place

guiding principles...

From the start, we agreed to adhere to certain values when implementing our Co-location

strategy...

4

Page 43: Agile power of place

GOING AGILE...

1

It’s about people not process.Individuals + their interactions over processes + tools

“The cohesiveness of the team has increased and team spirit was instilled.”

Page 44: Agile power of place

GOING AGILE... 2Working solutions over comprehensive documentation.Whatever works, big + small.

“Collaboration between testers & developers has increased since we co-locat-ed;we pretty much work together all the time, checking in with each other without really thinking about it.”

Page 45: Agile power of place

GOING AGILE...

Customer collaboration over contract negotiation.

Help the team co-author, not report-out.

“Being co-located has decreased the amount of e-mail I get.....now, if something needs to be addressed I just turn around and get it resolved right there.”

3

Page 46: Agile power of place

GOING AGILE...

Responding to change over following a plan.

And change is a good thing.

“Overhead related to our meetings was largely eliminated; decisions can be made quickly & effectively (being co-located).”

4

Page 47: Agile power of place

the experiment.

Page 48: Agile power of place

GOING AGILE...

1

Leverage what we have.Don’t assume you need to start from scratch. Idenfity the keepers.

“We were always a tight team but Just being able to listen to your team’s random banter makes you feel part of your team mates’ lives.”

Page 49: Agile power of place

GOING AGILE... 2Build-measure-learn.Don’t be afraid to make mistakes.Learn from them instead.

“There have been many instances of ‘positive eavesdropping’ in which team members have a chance to be invovled with discussions. This has helped create a cohesive understanding of deliverables.”

Page 50: Agile power of place

GOING AGILE...

33Critique + iterate.

This is about continuous improvement...so you’re never really done.

“It wasn’t perfect the first day, but we were able to tweak the space...move stuff around and pretty soon, it felt like our space.”

Page 51: Agile power of place

WHAT DID WE

LEARN?

Page 52: Agile power of place

Very  honest  feedback…  

Page 53: Agile power of place

Pods need to be larger.

“No room to layout work for drawing, reading or collaborating with others.”

Page 54: Agile power of place

GET-AWAY-SPACE

“No privacy whatsoever cannot make or receive personal calls with any privacy.”

Page 55: Agile power of place

Need even more flexibility inside the pod....

Page 56: Agile power of place

ERGONOMICS MATTER more surface area, more elbow-room

“Has negatively impacted basic job satisfaction which is sad because I like my co-workers and the work I do, but physical discomfort has made me dread coming to work.”

Page 57: Agile power of place

DIGITAL IS CRITICAL Data and voice need to support remote access

Page 58: Agile power of place

+ support the move-in process.

“I was hesitant at first, but I can honestly say I never want to work in a cubicle again.”

Page 59: Agile power of place

WHAT ARE THE

CHALLENGES?

Page 60: Agile power of place

ONE WON’T FIT ALL group sizes can vary from 5-12

Page 61: Agile power of place

FLEXIBILITY VS. THE WIRE

Page 62: Agile power of place

OPENNESS VS. THE WALL

Page 63: Agile power of place

COLLABORATION VS. FOCUS

Page 64: Agile power of place

PROXIMITY VS. PRIVACY

Page 65: Agile power of place

WHAT DOES

SUCCESSLOOK LIKE?

Page 66: Agile power of place

7NAVTEQ | Agile Team Workspaces Chicago, IL | 04.07.2011 | ©2011 Gensler |

What We Learned

10TH FLOOR “HOMEGROWN” POD-Maintains Personal Space-Underutilized Storage

17TH FLOOR PILOT POD-Not enough space, personal or overall.-Not enough storage.-Not enough workspace.-Too tight.

AGILE POD 2.0-Personal Space & Storage critical to maintain.-Accessible whiteboard space. / display space -Flexible Scrum Space -Space for visitors.-Social Support / Get-aways on floor

“I was really skeptical that it would make a difference but decided to give it a try. I really like it”

“The Pod facilitates communication between each other.We had good communication before, but now I feel it’s better.”

DESIGN RESPONSE

Page 67: Agile power of place

TEAM CO-LOCATION

Page 68: Agile power of place
Page 69: Agile power of place

OWNERSHIP

Page 70: Agile power of place
Page 71: Agile power of place
Page 72: Agile power of place

PERSISTENT STATUS

Page 73: Agile power of place
Page 74: Agile power of place

SWARMING TO SOLVE

Page 75: Agile power of place

POSITIVE EAVESDROPPING

Page 76: Agile power of place

TEAM IDENTITY

Page 77: Agile power of place
Page 78: Agile power of place

FACILITATION

Page 79: Agile power of place

RESULTSPods are now the standard for all Agile teams in Chicago.

Engagement scores in Chicago are higher than other non-colocated sites.

Teams have a sense of pride and ownership of their Pods.

Page 80: Agile power of place

WHAT’S

NEXT?

Page 81: Agile power of place

WORK IS A STATE OF MIND

WHAT WILL IT LOOK LIKE?

• a mash-up of space types• adjacent shared resources• individual space,

”corners”• multiple postures for work• a place to retreat, a place

to connect• a place to call my own• get-aways

• Create spaces that promote multiple modes of work: > Focusing and Producing > Meeting, Teaming and Collaborating > Socializing and Sharing > Learning and Mentoring

• Provide access to technology infrastructures and presentation tools for plug and play.

Page 82: Agile power of place
Page 83: Agile power of place
Page 84: Agile power of place

SPACE SHOULD COMMUNICATE ASHARED PURPOSE.

WHAT WILL IT LOOK LIKE?

• people space• display space• opportunities for team• social support• learning support

• Create spaces that feature and make big ideas and people visible.• Use the space as a storyteller about the team.

• Designate programs and spaces that promote social and learning activities—allow these spaces to be visible and part of the culture.

Page 85: Agile power of place
Page 86: Agile power of place
Page 87: Agile power of place
Page 88: Agile power of place

VIRTUAL CONNECTIONS AS IMPORTANT AS PHYSICAL ONES

WHAT WILL IT LOOK LIKE?

• remote access everywhere• good telepresence• wormholes• good ‘real’ experiences

• Build the technological infrastructure that makes virtual connections a no-brainer

• Create varieties of spaces that are fit to purpose...not all the same

• Zone the space so that noisy behaviors aren’t disturbing quiet work

Page 89: Agile power of place
Page 90: Agile power of place
Page 91: Agile power of place

SHIFT ‘ME’ SPACE TO BECOME ‘WE’ SPACE

WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE?

• hackable spaces that people own

• layered spaces with great resources

• transparency to see and be seen

• Activity based work spaces that gets people moving to the task

• Create varieties of spaces that appeal to all types of people: introverts and extroverts

• Thickly program spaces so that circulation is lively and serves multiple functions

Page 92: Agile power of place
Page 93: Agile power of place
Page 94: Agile power of place

THANK YOU.

QUESTIONS?

ROSHELLE RITZENTHALERDESIGN STRATEGIST, [email protected]@RoRitzen

JORGEN HESSELBERGDIRECTOR, AGILE ENTERPRISE [email protected]@JHesselberg