CONSULTANTS

8, De - Ba ng ler St. P.O. Box 1243,

Gb oko

+ 234-808-080-2046

E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m +234-703-430-2486

Agape Research:

The Final Word

By Peter Anyebe

AGAPE

CONSULTANTS

2nd

September, 2015

HubPages

View

my profile

WordPress

Google Me

Google+

Website:

www.identi

tykit.biz

The physical environment is designed, following gravity and

relativity, to make the reconstruction of reality a mirage; which

have turned the elephantine emotion into erratic and dominant

forces, to be tamed by the skeletal intellect, which must first, 1st

acquire the required energy

Keywords: Feelings, Self-Control, Learning, Effort, Self-Containment, Engagement,

Retention, Skill, Productivity, Leadership, Competency, Influence

CONSULTANTS

8, De - Ba ng ler St. P.O. Box 1243,

Gb oko

+ 234-808-080-2046

E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m +234-703-430-2486

Agape Research:

The Final Word

By

Peter Anyebe

0.00 Preamble

At Agape Consultants, Gboko we set out in 1988 to achieve the following:

Put a value on people, C

Put a value on organizations, ROI and

Create the enabling environment, EB in which the value may be optimized

This derived from the desire to put the right workforce, C in the right environment,

EB and delivering profitable business results, ROI. In 2015, about 28 years later, we

have achieved as follows:

Put a value on people, according to the capacities for productivity and value

creation in terms of the monetized return on investment, ROI; as well as

leadership and the number of people they are able to influence

Put a value on the health of organizations, BHI according to their

profitability, sustainability, and sensitivity to the environment

Optimize both people and organizational value, to boost the culture, OrgC

and the business environment, EB

It is hoped that this would pave the way for a precise HR, like its nearest neighbor

accountancy, as well as engineering and architecture.

1.0 Conceptualization

Precision required a recourse to first, 1st principles, to understand the human person

in proper perspective. The following two, 2 assumptions were kernel to the

conception of the person:

A paradigm shift in which science would perceive existence beyond matter,

to include mind, soul, and spirit

Another paradigm shift in business, where the emphasis shifts from profit

and loss to value creation

In both cases, the alternative paradigms are inclusive of the former. An emphasis on

value creation would also ensure good profit. And the four, 4 realms of existence

also capture matter. For instance soul is conceptualized as the product of the mind,

which functions to create with inputs from spirit and matter. Diagrammatically:

Then the quality of soul would derive from the capacity of mind to interpret input

from spirit and matter, appropriately. Moreover, people are evaluated against the

capacity for effort; as it is applied to thought and at work, to distinguish between the

following three, 3 phenomena:

Thought Pattern, f0

Behavior Pattern, Po

Learning Curve, LnG

Given the learning curve, LnG the capacities for productivity ROI and leadership,

Nu would be determined. And the factors LnG, EfT, and EnG would represent

measures of intellect, will, and emotion respectively; all three, 3 of which are

components of mind. While effort, EfT is actually a measure of the commitment of

the will, engagement, EnG would be a measure of the co-operation from the

emotion, which could be disruptive sometimes. The emotion, A and the intellect, F

work together, to generate the feelings, L that combine to define the soul, S for A =

LF2 and S = 1/L where L = 1/A2 F

2. Equivalently the factors RtN, f0, and ScT work

together for optimum value creation, which translates into wealth in the form of

profits.

2.0 Actualization

The following models were derived to establish this conception:

The perception model of mind, PMM

The natural order, N-O

The standard procedure series, SPS

The character model

The 6-Metrics model

The productivity model

For measurement, the following models are kernel:

The F-Scale

The identity kit, Id-K

The bill of health index, BHI

The appraisal model, AppM

The self-containment model, ScT

The self-control model, ScR

By the PMM, at optimum, the mind would

reduce phenomena into the five, 5 essential

components that define being. These include

the three, 3 form features that define spirit;

and the two, 2 wave features that define

matter, for 3 + 2 = 5. But the typical SPS

comprises six, 6 items, which are a

reduction from the three, 3 form features,

according to the two, 2 wave features, for 3

x 2 = 6. Serially:

Work, L

Energy, F

Exhaust, A

3. Energy, F1 Phenomenon

2. Work, L2 6. Purpose, A2

1. Work, L1 5. Principle, A1

4. Energy, F2

In this case, the sixth, 6th

item defines the object that the procedure seeks to achieve,

while the other five, 5 items describe the object. And the N-O comprises four, 4

items according to the duality series in operations research presented below:

Maxima, F1

Minimax, L2

Maximin, L1

Minima, F2

These define the first, 1st four, 4 items of the SPS, to predict the fifth, 5

th. The SPS is

actually the analogue of the N-O. While the N-O defines reality as it ought to be, the

personal order, P-O is a representation of the same reality, according to the person’s

perception of it. The F-Scale is a rendition of the SPS, so that the first, 1st four, 4

items are scrambled to calibrate the scale. The subject that is measured unscrambles

the items, according to the person’s perception of them, to measure the P-O against

the N-O as the factor-f0 or objectivity, f0.

Following Einstein, thought is reduced into intuition, Pc and rationality, Rn.

Intuition is evaluated as the capacity for phenomenological compression, Pc where

phenomena are interpreted, to reduce them into the essentials that give being.

Rationality corroborates this action, to impose order on the items. The character

model outlines the form of these two, 2 concepts as follows:

Thus character, C would be established by the thought pattern, which predicts the

behavior pattern, as a function of the performance at task by the standard

procedure, n. The factor-n is evaluated on the organizational kit, Org-K which is

a reduction of the essential jobs that are performed in the organization into duties,

activities, and tasks. The procedures for the performance at these tasks are then

standardized for use in the analysis. Diagrammatically:

Given these three, 3 factors including Pc, Rn, and n; together with the accountant’s

measures of revenue, profit, and cost of materials, the 6-metrics are determined as

follows:

The factors C and OrgC are input to the appraisal model, to evaluate the factor-

ROIAPP; which is input to the model of self-containment, ScT.

It is from the 6-metrics that learning, LnG and effort, EfT are derived. The factors

f0, RtN, and ScT are measures of intellect, emotions, and feelings respectively;

which define the form of engagement, EnG to quantify the commitment, C’ of the

will. They explain how the will, through character, C affects the intellect and the

emotion, through LnG and EfT respectively. At optimum performance, learning and

effort would be reciprocals, for EfT = 1/LnG; which makes the emotion and the

intellect, inverses. Optimum performance here would be a reference to self-control, ScR.

Given:

1. Pc C

2. Rn

3. √n

1. Revenue

2. Profit BHI OrgC

3. Cost of Materials

F

f0

EB

ROIAPP

EmP

RtN

EnG

SkG

ScT

The right Workforce, in the right Environment,

Delivering profitable Business Results

6-Metrics Model

3.0 Concluding

In all these, the work would be to put the emotion in the control of the intellect; so

that the feelings are normalized, to create a quality soul. This would be the

responsibility of the will, according to the person’s commitment to the task of soul

building. Ultimately, they would reduce phenomena to the four, 4 strategic

objectives, as evidence of optimum performance. By the productivity model,

commitment via the factor-C predicts productivity, according to the return on

investment, ROI. And optimum performance via the factor-f0 predicts leadership,

according to the approximation of the four, 4 strategic objectives, Nu.

In general, the following three, 3 features of the human person have been

highlighted, for form:

Leadership, L

Productivity, A and

Self-Control, F

These derive from the following fundamental assumptions:

Ultimately, the purpose of humanity and the universe would be, to build the

soul

But the body, which is material, would need to be sustained, for optimum

performance on the primary objective of soul building

The universe is designed to perturb humanity, into sharpening the intellect,

to gain control over the emotion

Recall that the human brain is designed so that

information reaches the emotion first, 1st before it gets to

the intellect. And it is the emotion that is in touch with the

environment, together with all of its vagaries. Moreover

the physical environment is designed, following gravity

and relativity, to make the reconstruction of reality a

mirage. These have turned the elephantine emotion into

erratic and dominant forces, to be tamed by the skeletal

intellect, which must first, 1st acquire the required energy. Given self-control therefore, a

certain amount of energy would be available to build the soul. This would be distributed

between productivity for sustenance, and leadership for soul building.

Appendix

The first, 1st two,

2 of the eighteen,

18 subjects

satisfy the

requirements of

the productivity

model, with data

from the identity

kit, Id-Kit:

RES = RGT,

Nu → 4

Ps → 20%

When the

productivity

model is

combined with

the bill of health

index, BHI

which is

evaluated for

companies with

data from their

books; the same

two, 2 subjects

are predicted

When the

productivity model

is combined with

the bill of health

index, BHI, as well

as the self-control

model, the same

two, 2 subjects are

predicted