Administrative Law May-August 2004
Transcript of Administrative Law May-August 2004
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
1/22
1. PAULINO SACDALAN, ROMEO GARCIA, NUMERIANO BAUTISTA, LEONARDOSACDALAN and SANTIAGO SACDALAN, petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS andBELEN LOPEZ DE GUIA represented by her Attorney-in-Fact MELBA G.VALENZUELA, respondentsG.R. no. 128967 May 20, 2004
Nature of DAR Provincial Adjudicator and the DARAB
The DAR Provincial Adjudicator and the DARAB should have been more circumspect
in the disposition of this case. Instead of facilitating the administration of justice,
their obstinate refusal to obey a valid final judgment of the Court of Appeals, further
delayed the resolution of this case and added valuable irretrievable years to a case
that has already dragged on for decades.
2. ATTY. ALBERTO P. QUINTO, complainant, vs. JUDGE GREGORIO S. VIOS,Municipal Trial Court, Kapatagan, Lanao del Norte, respondent.
A.M. no. MTJ-04-1551, May 21, 2004Administrative complaint against a judge
As a matter of policy, in the absence of fraud, dishonesty or corruption, the acts of a
judge in his judicial capacity are not subject to disciplinary action even though such
acts are erroneous.
However, erroneously a judges belief that counsel for the accused has no right to
waive the presentation of evidence, the same may only be considered an error
judgment- a judges failure to interpret the law or to property appreciate the
evidence presented does not necessarily render him administratively liable.
An administrative complaint against a judge cannot be pursued simultaneously
with the judicial remedies accorded to parties aggrieved by his erroneous order or
judgment.
Respondent judges actuations of virtually compelling a lawyer to withdraw as
counsel for the accused, threatening to punish him for contempt of court if he would
refuse, amount to vulgar and unbecoming conduct, classified as a light charge under
Rule 140 of the Rules of Court, as amended by A. M. No. 01-8-10-SC.
3. PASONG BAYABAS FARMERS ASSOCIATION, INC., represented by DOMINGOBANAAG, JR., President; BERNARDO POBLETE, Vice-President, and its
Members, petitioners, vs. The Honorable COURT OF APPEALS, CREDITO
ASIATIC, INC., ERNESTO TANCHI, SR., GEN. DIONISIO OJEDA (deceased), ELENA
P. BIGAY, and LANRICO MINISTERIO, respondents.
G. R. No. 142359, May 25, 2004Nature of Agricultural lands
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
2/22
Agricultural lands are only those lands which are arable or suitable lands that do not
include commercial, industrial and residential lands.
4. ALFREDO BON, complainant, vs. ATTYS. VICTOR S. ZIGA and ANTONIO A.ARCANGEL, respondents.
A.C. No. 5436. May 27, 2004
Nature of Notaries Public
Notarization is not an empty, meaningless, routinary act.
Notaries Public must observe with utmost care the basic requirements in the
performance for their duties.
5. EMMA V. DE JUAN, complainant, vs. ATTY. OSCAR R. BARIA III, respondent.A.C. No. 5817, May 27, 2004
Responsibility of an attorney
Among the fundamental rules of ethics is the principle that an attorney who
undertakes an action impliedly stipulates to carry it to its termination, that is, until
the case becomes final and executory.
A lawyer is not at liberty to abandon his client and withdraw his services without
reasonable cause and only upon notice appropriate in the circumstances.
Negligence of lawyer in connection with legal matters entrusted to them for
handling shall render them liable.
An attorney may only retire from the case either by a written consent of his client or
by permission of the court after due notice and hearing, in which event the attorney
should see to it that the name of the new attorney is recorded in the case.
6. FEDERICO D. RICAFORT, complainant, vs. ATTY. EDDIE R. BANSIL, respondent.Adm. Case No. 6298, May 27, 2004
Ex parte investigation
As a matter of procedure, the Investigating Commissioner should have proceeded
with the investigation ex parte pursuant to the provisions of Section 8, Rule 139-B of
the Rules of Court.
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
3/22
Where the complaint a lawyer is in connection with the discharge of his functions as
a notary public, and not as an elected barangay chairman. Thus, the Code of Conduct
and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees invoked by complainant
will not apply to the present administrative complaint against respondent.
Respondent, as a lawyer and a notary public, is covered by the Code of Professional
Responsibility and Code of Professional Ethics.
7. Re: Withholding of All the Salaries and Allowances of Mr. Datu Ashary M.Alauya, Clerk of Court, 4thSharia District Court, Marawi City
A.M. No. SDC-03-4-P. May 27, 2004
Responsibility of a clerk of court
A clerk of court and the administrative functions he performs are vital to the prompt
and proper administration of justice.
As court custodian, a clerk of court has the responsibility to ensure that records are
safely kept and the same are readily available upon the request of the parties or
order of the court.
As custodian of judicial records, it is incumbent upon him to ensure an orderly and
efficient record management system in the court and to supervise the personnel
under his office to function effectively.
8. PETER BEJARASCO, JR. and ISABELITA BEJARASCO, complainants, vs. JUDGEALFREDO D. BUENCONSEJO, Municipal Trial Court, Dalaguete, Cebu,
SECUNDINO PIEDAD, Clerk of Court, and LEONISA GONZALES, Court
Stenographer, Municipal Trial Court, Argao, Cebu, respondents.
A.M. No. MTJ-02-1417, May 27, 2004
Administrative cases may proceed independently of criminal proceedings
A judgment, to be valid, must have been personally and directly prepared by the
judge, and duly signed by him.
Judgment may be promulgated by the clerk of court only when the judge is absent or
outside the province or city.
Decisions promulgated after the judge who penned the same had been appointed to
and qualified in another office are null and void; In single courts like the regional
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
4/22
trial courts and the municipal trial courts, a decision may no longer be promulgated
after the ponente has vacated his office.
Administrative cases may proceed independently of criminal proceedings, and may
continue despite the dismissal of the latter charges.
9. SATURNINO OBAANA, JR., complainant, vs. JUDGE ARMANDO R. RICAFORT,Municipal Trial Court, Siaton, Negros Oriental, respondent.A.M. No. MTJ-04-1545. May 27, 2004Nature and responsibility of the clerk of court
A clerk of court occupies a very sensitive position that requires competence and
efficiency to insure the publics confidence in the administration of justice- he
cannot be permitted to slacken on his job under one pretext or another.
A clerk of court is also responsible in ensuring the orderly and efficient recordmanagement system in the court and to supervise the personnel under his office to
function effectively.
10.Executive Judge BENJAMIN M. AQUINO, JR., complainant, vs. BETHSAIDA M.MIRANDA, Clerk III, Metropolitan Trial Court Branch 54, Navotas, Metro
Manila, respondent.
A.M. No. P-01-1453. May 27, 2004
Jurisdiction of the Court over administrative cases
A public servant whose career is on the line would normally want the investigatingbody to know his or her whereabouts for purposes of notice.
The Court is not ousted of its jurisdiction over an administrative case by the mere
fact that the respondent public official ceases to hold office during the pendency of
respondents case.
The men and women who work in the judiciary must always act with propriety for
the image of a court of justice is mirrored in the conduct of its personnel.
The conduct of all those involved in the administration of justice from the judge to
the lowliest clerk is circumscribed with the heavy burden of responsibility,
accountability, integrity, uprightness and honesty.
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
5/22
To constitute grave misconduct, the acts complained of should be corrupt or
inspired by an intention to violate the law, or constitute flagrant disregard of well-
known legal rules.
11.JUDY SISMAET, complainant, vs.ERIBERTO R. SABAS, Clerk of Court IV, MTCCPuerto Princesa City and ERNESTO T. SIMPLICIANO, Sheriff III, MTCC Puerto
Princesa City, respondents.
A.M. No. P-03-1680. May 27, 2004
Ministerial duty of a sheriff
Sheriffs play an important role in the administration of justice because they are
tasked to execute the final orders and judgments of the courts; The sheriff charged
with this task must act with considerable dispatch so as not to delay the
administration of justice.
The duty of a sheriff to execute a valid writ is ministerial and not discretionary. A
purely ministerial act or duty is one which an officer or tribunal performs in the
context of a given set of facts, in a prescribed manner and without regard to the
exercise of his own judgment upon the propriety or impropriety of the act done. A
discretionary act, on the other hand, is a faculty conferred upon a court or official by
which he may decide the question either way and still be right.
The conduct of every person connected with an office charged with the dispensationof justice, from the presiding judge to the lowest clerk, is charged with a heavy
burden of responsibility.
12.JUDGE AMALIA F. DY, complainant, vs. ATTY. BONIFACIO S. PASCUA, Clerk ofCourt, and ANITA G. OLIVEROS, Clerk III, Regional Trial Court of MandaluyongCity, Branch 213, respondents.
A.M. No. P-04-1798. May 27, 2004
Judges authority to discipline erring court personnel
The Supreme Courts authority cannot be dependent on or frustrated by private
arrangement between parties.
Judges are authorized to discipline erring court personnel in their respective salas,
but such authority must not be exercised arbitrarily.
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
6/22
Where the employees act of discourtesy is their first offense, the disciplining judge
has no authority to suspend them outright-they should only have been reprimanded
for their unruly behavior.
Court personnel must, at all times, act with strict propriety and proper decorum so
as to earn the publics regard for the judiciary.
13.SALVADOR SISON, complainant, vs. JUDGE JOSE F. CAOIBES, JR., PresidingJudge, and TEODORO S. ALVAREZ, Sheriff IV, Regional Trial Court, Las Pias
City, Branch 253, respondents.
A.M. No. RTJ-03-1771. May 27, 2004
Judges inherent power of contempt
A judge should never allow himself to be moved by pride, prejudice, passion or
pattiness in the performance of his duties.
While at first blush, it would seem that the respondent judge was justified in holding
the complainant for contempt, due to the latters refusal to comply with the judges
order, it is not lost upon this Court that the complainant was not a party to any of
the cases pending before the respondent judge.
The fact that the respondent judge insisted that the complainant personally file hiscomment in court gives rise to doubts as to the motive behind it; as the Investigating
Justice puts it, the requirement of personal filing was deliberately inserted so that
the respondent could confront and harass the complainant.
The act of a judge in citing a person in contempt of court in a manner which smacks
of retaliation, as in the case at bar, is appalling and violative of Rule 2.01 of the Code
of Judicial Conduct which mandates that a judge should so behave at all times to
promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
The Court has not been blind to the improper use by judges of the erstwhile
inherent power of contempt which, in fine, amounts to grave abuse of authority.
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
7/22
14.PROV. PROSECUTOR DORENTINO Z. FLORESTA, complainant, vs. JudgeELIODORO G. UBIADAS, Regional Trial Court, Olongapo City, Branch 72
respondent.A.M. No. RTJ-03-1774. May 27, 2004
Proper recourse of a party aggrieved
The proper recourse of a party aggrieved by the decision of a judge is to appeal to
the proper court, not file an administrative complaint.
Only in cases where the error is gross or patent, deliberate and malicious, or
incurred with evident bad faith may administrative sanctions be imposed.
Article VIII, Section 15(1) of the 1987 Constitution and Canon 3, Rule 3.05 of the
Code of Judicial Conduct direct judges to dispose of their cases promptly and within
the prescribed periods, failing which they are liable for gross inefficiency.
15.ARMANDO F. BERNARDO, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION and LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, respondents.G.R. No. 124261 May 27, 2004
Effects of administratively liability filed for acts not alleged in the formal
charges
The Civil Service Commission erred in finding an employee administratively liablefor acts not alleged in the formal charges- the employee was deprived of his right to
be informed of the charges against him, and to accord him the right to adduce
evidence to controvert the said charges.
The Supreme Court has categorically pronounced that "the nature and
responsibilities of public officers enshrined in the 1987 Constitution and oft-
repeated in our case law are not mere rhetorical words, not to be taken as idealistic
sentiments but as working standards and attainable goals that should be matched
with actual deeds."
The causes which warrant the dismissal of a civil servant need not necessarily be
work-related or committed in the course of the performance of duty by the person
charged.
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
8/22
Administrative decisions on matters within their jurisdiction are entitled to respect
and can only be set aside on proof of grave abuse of discretion, fraud or error of law.
16.HORACIO B. APUYAN, JR. and ALEXANDER O. EUGENIO, complainants, vs.ALFREDO G. STA. ISABEL, Sheriff IV, Regional Trial Court (Branch 161), Pasig
City, respondent.
A.M. NO. P-01-1497 : May 28, 2004
Consideration of the penalties to be imposed
Section 53 of the Revised Uniform Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service
which provides that in the determination of the penalties to be imposed, the
extenuating, mitigating, aggravating or alternative circumstances may be
considered.
17.JACINTO R. FERNANDEZ, JR., complainant, vs. MARIETTA M. GATAN, Clerk III,RTC, Br. 23 Roxas, Isabela, respondent.
A.M. No. P-03-1720. May 28, 2004
Grave misconduct defined
Grave misconduct is a malevolent transgression of some established and definite
rule of action, more particularly, unlawful behavior or gross negligence by the public
officer or employee which threatens the very existence of the system of
administration of justice.
18.RELIWAYS INC. represented by: AURELIO P. VENDIVEL, JR., complainant, vs.LAMBERTO P. GRANTOZA, Process Server, MeTC, Br. 62, Makati City,
respondent.
A.M. NO. P-04-1812 : May 28, 2004Penalty for willful failure to pay
Willful failure to pay just debts classified as a light offense and reprimand is thepenalty for the first offense.
19.FERMA PORTIC, complainant, vs. JUDGE VICTORIA VILLALON-PORNILLOS, asPresiding Judge, Regional Trial Court, Branch 10, Malolos, Bulacan,
respondent.
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
9/22
A.M. No. RTJ-02-1717. May 28, 2004
Evidence needed to Support administrative charges
Administrative charges against members of the judiciary must be supported at least
by substantial evidence.
An inquiry into the administrative liability of a judge may be resorted to only after
the available remedies have been exhausted and decided with finality.
20.SAN JUAN DE DIOS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION EMPLOYEES UNION-ALLIANCEOF FILIPINO WORKERS; MA. CONSUELO MAQUILING, LEONARDO MARTINEZ,
ANDRES AYALA, VIRGINIA ARLANTE, ROGELIO BELMONTE, MA. ELENA GARCIA
and RODOLFO CALUCIN, JR., petitioners, vs. SAN JUAN DE DIOS EDUCATIONAL
FOUNDATION, INC. (HOSPITAL) and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, respondents.G.R. No. 143341. May 28, 2004
Effect of substantial evidence
The findings of fact of quasi-judicial bodies like the NLRC, are accorded with respect,
even finality, if supported by substantial evidence. Particularly when passed upon
and upheld by the Court of Appeals, they are binding and conclusive upon the
Supreme Court and will not normally be disturbed.
21.Re: Administrative Liabilities of the Security Personnel Involved in the Entryof an Unidentified person at the Philippine Judicial Academy
A. M. No. 2003-18-SC. June 3, 2004
Conduct and behavior of everyone connected with an office charged should be
circumscribed with the heavy burden of responsibility.
The conduct and behavior of everyone connected with an office charged with the
dispensation of justice, from the presiding judge to the lowliest clerk, should be
circumscribed with the heavy burden of responsibility.
Simple neglect of duty, classified as a less grave offense, carries a penalty of
suspension for one month and one day to six months for the first violation.
22.Re: AC No. 04-AM-2002 (Josefina Fria vs. Gemiliana De Los Angeles)
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
10/22
A.M. No. CA-02-15-P. June 3, 2004
Burden of proof in administrative proceedings
In administrative proceedings, the complainant has the burden of proving, by
substantial evidence, the allegations in the complaint.
Complainant failed to discharge the quantum of evidence substantial evidence to
fault respondent.
23.OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, petitioner, vs. JUDGE FRANKLIN A.VILLEGAS, respondent.
A.M. No. RTJ-00-1526. June 3, 2004
Nature of office of a judge
The noble office of a judge is to render justice not only impartially but expeditiouslyas well, for delay in the disposition of cases erodes the faith and confidence of our
people in the judiciary, lowers its standards and brings it into disrepute.
Judge Villegas contumacious conduct and blatant disregard of the Courts mandate
for more than three years amounted to studied defiance and downright
insubordination.
24.CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION,petitioner, vs. DELIA T. CORTEZ, respondent.G. R. No. 155732. June 3, 2004Penalty for dishonesty and grave misconduct
Under the Civil Service Law and its implementing rules, dishonesty, grave
misconduct and conduct grossly prejudicial to the best interest of the service are
grave offenses punishable by dismissal from the service.
25.GLORIA SANTOS DUEAS, petitioner, vs. SANTOS SUBDIVISION HOMEOWNERSASSOCIATION, respondent.
G.R. No. 149417. June 4, 2004Administrative process as pre condition before a party is allowed to seek
intervention of the courts
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
11/22
While the Court has held that before a party is allowed to seek intervention of the
courts, it is a pre condition that he avail himself of all administrative processes
afforded him, nonetheless, said rule is not without exceptions.
26.Re: Habitual tardiness Incurred by Mr. Gideon M. Alibang for the FirstSemester of 2003
A.M. No. 2003-11-S C. June 15, 2004
Habitual tardiness as a ground for administrative liability
An employee shall be considered habitually tardy if he incurs tardiness, regardless
of the number of minutes, ten (10) times a month for at least two (2) months in a
semester or at least two (2) consecutive months during the year.
Moral obligations, performance of household chores and traffic problems are not
sufficient reasons to excuse habitual tardiness, although in certain cases these may
be considered to mitigate administrative liability.
By reason of the nature and functions of their office, officials and employees of the
Judiciary must be role models in the faithful observance of the constitutional cannon
that public office is a public trust. Inherent in this mandate are the observance of
prescribed office hours and the efficient use of every moment thereof for public
service.
27.FREEDOM FROM DEBT COALITION, ANA MARIA NEMENZO, as President ofFREEDOM FROM DEBT COALITION, MA. TERESA I. DIOKNO-PASCUAL, REP.
LORETTA ANN ROSALES (Party-List Akbayan), REP. JOSE VIRGILIO BAUTISTA
(Party-List Sanlakas), REP. RENATO MAGTUBO (Party-List Partido
Manggagawa), petitioners, vs. ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, MANILAELECTRIC COMPANY (MERALCO), respondents.
G.R. No. 161113 June 15, 2004
Certification of the notice of publication should accompany the application.
The rules require that a certification of the notice of publication should accompany
the application.
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
12/22
It is not required to wait until all pleadings are submitted nor is its power to issue
provisional orders stayed by pending matters such as motions for production of
documents.
It is therefore purposeless for the majority to annul the questioned order and
require the republication of MERALCOs application.
An administrative agency may be empowered to approve provisionally, when
demanded by urgent public need, rates of public utilities without hearing.
The authority to issue provisional orders of rate adjustments cannot be considered
as one of the powers that the legislature intended the ERC to possess, for if it were
intention of the lawmakers, there would not have been a black hole in the law.
The power to fix prices and make rates cannot be conferred by implication, but mustbe conferred under statutory or constitutional language that is free from doubt, and
admits of no other reasonable construction.
Considering the EPIRA does not contain the authority to grant provisional rates, it
follows then that to insist that the ERC has such authority, would be to grant the ERC
an authority that would be inconsistent with the EPIRA.
The publication made by MERALCO, obviously, does not sufficiently inform the
public of the nature and substance of the application, as intended by law.
28.PROFESSIONAL REGULATION COMMISSION (PRC), CHAIRMAN HERMOGENES P.POBRE, ASSOCIATE COMMISSIONER ARMANDO PASCUAL, BOARD OF
MEDICINE, CHAIRMAN RODOLFO P. DE GUZMAN, JOSE S. RAMIREZ, JUANITO B.
BILLOTE, RUBEN R. POLICARPIO, EDGARDO T. FERNANDO and RICARDO D.
FULGENCIO II, petitioners, vs. ARLENE V. DE GUZMAN, VIOLETA V. MENESES,
CELERINA S. NAVARRO, JOSE RAMONCITO P. NAVARRO, ARNEL V. HERRERA
and GERALDINE ELIZABETH M. PAGILAGAN, ELNORA R. RAQUENO, MARISSA A.REGODON, LAURA M. SANTOS, KARANGALAN D. SERRANO, DANILO A.
VILLAVER, MARIA ROSARIO L. LEONOR, ALICIA S. LIZANO, MARITEL M.ECHIVERRI, BERNADETTE T. MENDOZA, FERNANDO F. MANDAPAT, ALELI A.
GOLLAYAN, ELCIN C. ARRIOLA, HERMINIGILDA E. CONEJOS, SALLY B.
BUNAGAN, ROGELIO B. ANCHETA, OSCAR H. PADUA, JR., EVELYN D. GRAJO,EVELYN S. ACOSTA, MARGARITA BELINDA L. VICENCIO, VALENTINO P.
ARBOLEDA, EVELYN O. RAMOS, ACHILLES J. PERALTA, CORAZON M. CRUZ,
LEUVINA P. CHICO, JOSEPH A. JAO, MA. LUISA S. GUTIERREZ, LYDIA C. CHAN,
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
13/22
OPHELIA C. HIDALGO, FERNANDO T. CRUZ, MELVIN M. USITA, RAFAEL I.
TOLENTINO, GRACE E. UY, CHERYL R. TRIGUERO, MICHAEL L. SERRANO,
FEDERICO L. CASTILLO, MELITA J. CAEDO, SAMUEL B. BANGOY, BERNARDITAB. SY, GLORIA T. JULARBAL, FREDERICK D. FRANCISCO, CARLOS M. BERNARDO,
JR., HUBERT S. NAZARENO, CLARISSA B. BACLIG, DAYMINDA G. BONTUYAN,
BERNADETTE H. CABUHAT, NANCY J. CHAVEZ, MARIO D. CUARESMA, ERNESTO
L. CUE, EVELYN C. CUNDANGAN, RHONEIL R. DEVERATURDA, DERILEEN D.
DORADO, SAIBZUR N. EDDING, VIOLETA C. FELIPE, HERMINIO V. FERNANDEZ,
JR., MARIA VICTORIA M. LACSAMANA, NORMA G. LAFAVILLA, RUBY B. LANTIN,
MA. ELOISA Q. MALLARI, CLARISA SJ. NICOLAS, PERCIVAL H. PANGILINAN,
ARNULFO A. SALVADOR, ROBERT B. SANCHEZ, MERLY D. STA. ANA and
YOLANDA P. UNICA, respondents.
G.R. No. 144681. June 21, 2004
Doctrine of exhaustion does not apply in pure question of law
The power to regulate the exercise of a profession or pursuit of an occupation
cannot be exercised by the State or its agents in an arbitrary, despotic, or oppressive
manner.
The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies does not apply where, as in
this case, a pure question of law is raised.
29.SOLEDAD E. VELASCO, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, SOCIAL SECURITYCOMMISSION, HERMINIO RIVERA, VICENTE SUDARIO, RENATO MANLANGIT,JOSE PUSING, REYNALDO SUGUI, MANUEL DINO, MARTIN VILLARUEL,PAQUITO BALISONG, JOSE POSADAS, MARIO POSADAS, FERNANDO CAYCO,RUBEN ROQUE, FERNANDO MANLANGIT, FRANCISCO ESTILLORE, NICOLASAMARO, PAULINO SUDARIO, DIEGO CAHILLO, AND HERMINIO ANTONIO,respondents. SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM, intervenor.G.R. No. 130244. July 7, 2004Duplicate original copy defined
The meaning of duplicate original copy, thus: 1. The duplicate original copy shall
be understood to be that copy of the decision, judgment, resolution or order which
is intended for and furnished to a party in the case or proceeding in the court or
adjudicative body which rendered and issued the same. . . .2. The duplicate original
copy must be duly signed or initialed by the authorities or the corresponding officer
or representative of the issuing entity, or shall at least bear the dry seal thereof or
any other official indication of the authenticity and completeness of such copy. . . .
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
14/22
Pursuant to paragraph 2 of the Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 3-96, the
presence of the seal qualifies the document as a duplicate original copy
30.AGUS DWIKARNA, petitioner, vs. HON. ANDREA D. DOMINGO, Commissioner,Bureau of Immigration, GEN. LEANDRO MENDOZA,*Chief, Philippine NationalPolice, GEN. JAIME G. CARINGAL, Chief, Intelligence Group, Philippine NationalPolice, RONALDO P. LEDESMA, Chief, Bureau of Special Inquiry, and the Boardof Commissioners, Bureau of Immigration, respondents.
G.R. No. 153454. July 7, 2004
Non-interference of courts in matters addressed to the sound discretion ofgovernment agencies
Courts will not interfere in matters which are addressed to the sound discretion of
government agencies entrusted with the regulation of activities coming under thespecial technical knowledge and training of such agencies.
A person convicted of a crime and ordered deported at the same time must first
serve his sentence before he is deported.
31.Pompeyo Querubin, petitioner vs. Regional Cluster Director, Legal andAdjudication Office, COA Regional Office No. VI, Pavia, Iloilo City, respondent
G.R. No. 159299, July 7, 2004Grant of bonuses and allowances
Section 13 of PD 198, as amended, categorically forbids the grant of bonuses and
allowances other than payment of per diems.
32.Ana Marie Cambaliza, Complainant, vs. Atty. Ana-Luz B. Cristal-Tenorio,respondent
Adm. Case No. 6290, July 14, 2004
Administrative proceedings in case of suspension or disbarment
A case of suspension or disbarment may proceed regardless of interest or lack of
interest of the complainant.
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2004/jul2004/153454.htm#_ftn1http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2004/jul2004/153454.htm#_ftn1http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2004/jul2004/153454.htm#_ftn1http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2004/jul2004/153454.htm#_ftn1 -
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
15/22
When the criminal prosecution based on the same act charged is still pending in
court, any administrative disciplinary proceedings for the same act must await the
outcome of the criminal case to avoid contradictory findings.
A lawyer who allows a non-member of the Bar to misrepresent himself as a lawyer
and to practice law is guilty of violating Canon 9 and Rule 9.01 of the Code of
Professional Responsibility.
33.JUDGE LORINDA T. MUPAS, petitioner, vs. JUDGE DOLORES L. ESPAOL,Regional Trial Court, Branch 90, Damarias, Cavite, respondent.
A.M. No. RTJ-04-1850. July 14, 2004
Powers of an executive judge
It is elementary that an Executive Judge only has administrative supervision over
lower courts. Her function relates only to the management of first and second levelcourts, within her administrative area with a view to attaining prompt and
convenient dispatch of its business. Acting as such, she cannot unilaterally override
the MTCs actions in cases pending with it under the guise of administrative
supervision, without running afoul of the orderly administration of justice. Only
when her courts jurisdiction is appropriately invoked in an appeal or certiorari and
other special civil actions can respondent judge, in her judicial capacity, override the
lower courts judgment.
The powers of an executive judge relate only to those necessary or incidental to the
performance of his/her functions in relation to court administration.
The earnest efforts of judges to promote a speedy administration of justice must at
all times be exercised with due recognition of the boundaries and limits of their
jurisdiction or authority. Respondent's ardent determination to expedite the case
and render prompt justice may be a noble objective but she did so in a manner
which took away from the complainant MTC judge the initiative which by
constitutional and legal mandates properly belongs to her.
With regard to the hold-departure order, Circular No. 39-97 limits the authority toissue hold-departure orders to criminal cases within the jurisdiction of second level
courts
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
16/22
34.BENJAMIN A. RIVERA, SIMEON B. QUILANG, JR. and NICANOR ASUNCION,petitioners, vs. JUDGE TEODULO E. MIRASOL, Regional Trial Court, Branch 23,
Roxas, Isabela, respondent.A.M. No. RTJ-04-1885. July 14, 2004
Cessation from office because of retirement does not warrant the dismissal of
the administrative complaint
In the absence of fraud, dishonesty or corruption, the acts of a judge in his official
capacity do not always constitute misconduct although the same acts may be
erroneous. True, a judge may not be disciplined for error of judgment absent proof
that such error was made with a conscious and deliberate intent to cause an
injustice. This does not mean, however, that a judge need not observe propriety,
discreetness and due care in the performance of his official functions.
Cessation from office because of retirement does not warrant the dismissal of theadministrative complaint filed against him while he was still in service.
35.Eastern Telecommunications Philippines, Inc., and TelecommunicationsTechnologies, Inc., petitioner, vs. International Communication Corporation,
respondent
G.R. No. 135992. July 23, 2004
Jurisdiction of National telecommunications Commission
The National telecommunications Commission as the regulatory agency of the
national government with jurisdiction over all telecommunications entities, it is
clothed with authority and given ample discretion to grant a provisional permit or
authority. It also has the authority to issue Certificates of Public Convenience and
Necessity (CPCN) for the installation, operation, and maintenance of
communications facilities and services, radio communications systems, telephone
and telegraph systems, including the authority to determine the areas of operations
of applicants for telecommunications services.
36.GLOBE TELECOM, INC., petitioner, vs. THE NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION, COMMISSIONER JOSEPH A. SANTIAGO, DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS
AURELIO M. UMALI and NESTOR DACANAY, and SMART COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. respondents.
G.R. No. 143964. July 26, 2004
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
17/22
Substantive rights in administrative proceedings
Every party subject to administrative regulation deserves an opportunity to know,
through reasonable regulations promulgated by the agency, of the objective
standards that have to be met. Such rule is integral to due process, as it protects
substantive rights.
It is not relevant to this case that the process for obtaining prior approval under the
PTA and its Implementing Rules is administrative in nature. While this may be so,
the assailed NTCs determination and corresponding penalty were rendered in the
exercise of quasi-judicial functions- all the requirement of due process attendant to
the exercise of quasi-judicial power apply.
The Court usually accords great respect to the technical findings of administrative
agencies in the fields of their expertise, even if they are infelicitously worded.However, the above-quoted finding is nothing more than bare assertions,
unsupported by substantial evidence.
Judicial fact-finding of the de novo kind is generally abhorred and the shift of
decisional responsibility to the judiciary is not favored as against the substantiated
and specialized determination of administrative agencies.
While stability in the law, particularly in the business field, is desirable, there is no
demand that the NTC slavishly follow precedent. However, we think it essential, for
the sake of clarity and intellectual honesty, that if an administrative agency decides
inconsistently with previous action, that it explain thoroughly why a different result
is warranted, or if need be, why the previous standards should no longer apply or
should be overturned.
It is clear that before NTC could penalize Globe and Smart for unauthorized
provision of SMS, it must first establish that SMS is VAS.
The opportunity to adduce evidence is essential in the administrative process, as
decisions must be rendered on the evidence presented, either in the hearing, or atleast contained in the record and disclosed to the parties affected.
Notice and hearing are the bulwark of administrative due process, the right to which
is among the primary rights that must be respected even in administrative
proceedings.
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
18/22
It is essential to emphasize the need for a hearing before a fine may be imposed, as it
is clearly a punitive measure undertaken by an administrative agency in the exercise
of its quasi-judicial functions. Inherently, notice and hearing are indispensable for
the valid exercise by an administrative agency of its quasi-judicial functions.
The credibility of an administrative agency entrusted with specialized fields subsists
not on judicial doctrine alone, but more so on its intellectual strength, adherence to
law, and basic fairness.
37.ROMEO B. ALMOJUELA, JR., complainant, vs. JUDGE REVELINO M. RINGOR andAMALIA L. DIRECTO, Clerk of Court, Municipal Trial Court, Balaoan, La Union,
respondents.
A.M. No. MTJ-04-1521. July 27, 2004
Responsibility of Judges
Every judge is required to observe the law. When the law is sufficiently basic, a
judge owes it to his office to simply apply it; and anything less than that would be
constitutive of gross ignorance of the law. In short, when the law is so elementary,
not to be aware of it constitutes gross ignorance of the law.
A judge should be studious of the principles of law.
It is highly imperative that judges be conversant with the law and basic legalprinciples.
The misconduct must imply wrongful intention and not a mere error of judgment.
38.PHILIPPINE PORTS AUTHORITY, petitioner, vs. SARGASSO CONSTRUCTION &DEVELOPMENT CORP., PICK& SHOVEL, INC., ATLANTIC ERECTORS, INC. (Joint
Venture), respondents.G.R. No. 146478. July 30, 2004
GOCC as the lead counsel
By force Administrative Code, the GOCC is the lead counsel of all GOCCs and no
agreement or arrangement entered into by, or any act of omission of, GOCC can alter
set-up.
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
19/22
39.ATTY. REX J.M.A. FERNANDEZ, complainant, vs. COURT OF APPEALSASSOCIATE JUSTICES EUBOLO G. VERZOLA, MARTIN S. VILLARAMA, Jr., and
MARIO L. GUARIA III, respondents.A.M. No. CA-04-40. August 13, 2004
Complainant has the burden of proving by substantial evidence
In administrative proceedings, the complainant has the burden of proving by
substantial evidence the allegations in his complaint. In the absence of evidence to
the contrary, the presumption that the respondent has regularly performed his
duties will prevail. Even in administrative cases, if a respondent judge should be
disciplined for a grave offense, the evidence against him should be competent and
derived from direct knowledge.
Court will not shirk from its responsibility of imposing discipline upon itsemployees, judges and Associate Justices alike; but neither will it hesitate to shield
them from unfounded suits that serve to disrupt rather than promote the orderly
administration of justice.
40.RE: REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED IN THE REGIONAL TRIALCOURT, BRANCH 34, BALAOAN, LA UNION. (Clerk of Court, ATTY. JOVITO M.
MARRON)
A.M. No. 02-1-66-RTC. August 19, 2004Duty of the Clerks of court
Clerks of court are presumed to be aware of their duty to immediately deposit the
various funds received by them in the authorized government depositories for they
are not supposed to keep funds in their personal possession.
The Court condemns any conduct, act or omission which violates the norm of public
accountability or diminishes the faith of the people in the judiciary.
41.OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, complainant, vs. JUDGE OCTAVIO A.FERNANDEZ, Municipal Circuit Trial Court, General M. Natividad-Llanera,
respondent.
A.M. No. MTJ-03-1511. August 20, 2004
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
20/22
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
21/22
By reason of the nature and functions of their office, the officials and employees of
the Judiciary must be role models in the faithful observance of the constitutional
canon that public office is a public trust.
44.Re: Habitual Tardiness of MARIO J. TAMANG, Sheriff IV, Regional Trial Court,Branch 168, Pasig City
A.M. No. P-04-1861. August 31, 2004
Officials and employees of the Judiciary as role models in the faithful
observance that public office is a public trust
Moral obligations, performance of household chores, traffic problems and health,
domestic and financial concerns are not sufficient reasons to excuse habitual
tardiness.
By reason of the nature and functions of their office, the officials and employees of
the Judiciary must be role models in the faithful observance of the constitutional
canon that public office is a public trust.
45.CONCERNED CITIZEN, complainant, vs. ROLANDO Boyet BAUTISTA, ProcessServer, RTC- OCC, Balanga City, Bataan, respondent.
A.M. NO. P-04-1876 : August 31, 2004
Entire time of the officials and employees in the Judiciary be devoted to their
official work
The avowed objective of Administrative Circular No. 5 dated October 4, 1988 is to
ensure that the entire time of the officials and employees in the Judiciary be devoted
to their official work to insure the efficient and speedy administration of justice.
46.TOMAS G. VELASQUEZ, Officer-In-Charge, Office of the School Superintendent,DECS Division of Abra; MARIETTA BERSALONA, Chairperson, DECS Fact
Finding Committee; EDUARDO RUPERTO, JOAQUIN PILIEN and LUZ CURBI,Members, DECS Fact Finding Committee, petitioners vs. HELEN B.
HERNANDEZ, respondent.G.R. No. 150732. August 31, 2004
Substantive evidence to support complaint in administrative proceedings
One may be heard, not solely by verbal presentation but also, and perhaps even
many times more creditably than oral argument, through pleadings.
-
8/13/2019 Administrative Law May-August 2004
22/22
Technical rules of procedure and evidence are not even strictly applied to
administrative proceedings, and administrative due process cannot be fully equated
to due process in its strict judicial sense.
A finding of guilt in an administrative case would have to be sustained for as long as
it is supported by substantial evidence that the respondent has committed the acts
stated in the complaint or formal charge. As defined, substantial evidence is such
relevant evidence as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a
conclusion. This is different from the quantum of proof required in criminal
proceedings which necessitates a finding of guilt of the accused beyond reasonable
doubt.
47.FRANCISCO I. CHAVEZ, petitioner, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS,represented by its Chairman, BENJAMIN S. ABALOS, ESMERALDA AMORA-LADRA, in her capacity as Acting Director IV, National Capital Judicial Region,Commission on Elections, and the SOLICITOR GENERAL, respondents.G.R. No. 162777. August 31, 2004Police Power
Police power, as an inherent attribute of sovereignty, is the power to prescribe
regulations to promote the health, morals, peace, education, good order, or safety,
and the general welfare of the people.