Acoustic Trauma: Minimum Exposures to Continuous Noise...TTS experiments had no PTS after more...

9
2/20/19 1 Acoustic Trauma: Minimum Exposures to Continuous Noise Robert A Dobie Elliott H Berger NHCA; Grapevine TX, Feb 8, 2019 How it started Berger: Single MRI session (even w/HPDs) can lead to minimal TTS (ABR; Jin et al 2018); can we predict risk of PTS using ISO 1999? Dobie: let’s look at Dix Ward’s (1991) paper Berger: why don’t you update Ward’s analysis of acoustic trauma and present this at NHCA? Dobie: why don’t you? Berger: let’s do it together. Annals of Surgery, 1945 Definitions

Transcript of Acoustic Trauma: Minimum Exposures to Continuous Noise...TTS experiments had no PTS after more...

Page 1: Acoustic Trauma: Minimum Exposures to Continuous Noise...TTS experiments had no PTS after more severe exposures) •All reported AT exposures exceeded OSHA limits; AT is unlikely to

2/20/19

1

AcousticTrauma:MinimumExposurestoContinuousNoise

RobertADobieElliottHBerger

NHCA;GrapevineTX,Feb8,2019

Howitstarted

• Berger:SingleMRIsession(evenw/HPDs)canleadtominimalTTS(ABR;Jinetal2018);canwepredictriskofPTSusingISO1999?

• Dobie:let’slookatDixWard’s(1991)paper• Berger:whydon’tyouupdateWard’sanalysisofacoustictraumaandpresentthisatNHCA?

• Dobie:whydon’tyou?• Berger:let’sdoittogether.

AnnalsofSurgery,1945

Definitions

Page 2: Acoustic Trauma: Minimum Exposures to Continuous Noise...TTS experiments had no PTS after more severe exposures) •All reported AT exposures exceeded OSHA limits; AT is unlikely to

2/20/19

2

AcousticTrauma• Olderauthors(and,sadly,evensomeofourcontemporarycolleagues):anyhearingchangecausedbynoise(temporary orpermanent,acuteorchronic)

• Currentusage:“asuddenchangeinhearingasaresultofasingleexposureto… sound”(ACOEM,1989,2002,2012)(Chadwick,Hinchcliffe,andGlorigpapersinOccupationalHearingLoss,ed.Robinson,1971)(Sataloff&Michael,HearingConservation,1973)

• OurreviewislimitedtopuretonePTSfromcontinuousnoise

Acoustictraumavs.“acousticshock”

• Recentpapers(Westcott2006;Hooper2014;Baguley etal2016)suggestthatsuddenunexpectedsoundsthatdon’tcausePTSareassociatedwith– Hyperacusis– Otalgia– Tinnitus– Dizziness– Sleepdisturbance

• MostlyfromclustersofcallcenteremployeesinAustralia,Denmark,andGB(socialcontagion?)

• Briefsounds,levels≥82dBA(McFerran &Baguley 2007)• Nodocumentedobjectivefindings

Ward1991;“HearingLossfromNoiseandMusic”PresentedatAudioEngineeringSociety.

“Bob–Itsurewouldbenicetobeabletoaddtothissparsecollectionofpoints,butsofewpeoplehavetheforesighttogetanaudiogrambeforeacoustictrauma.- Dix”

Ourgoalwastodojustthat.

Page 3: Acoustic Trauma: Minimum Exposures to Continuous Noise...TTS experiments had no PTS after more severe exposures) •All reported AT exposures exceeded OSHA limits; AT is unlikely to

2/20/19

3

Methods• Searchforpaperswithexposures(level,duration)andaudiometricevidenceofPTS(presentatleastoneweeklater)

• Sources:Ward1991references,RADandEHBownfiles(>6000PDFseach),otherref.lists

• PubMed(Human,English)– “acoustictrauma”OR(hearinglossAND(noiseORmusic)AND(suddenORacute))

– 577hits,only11metcriteriabasedontitle,abstract• Included19reMRI(nonedocumentingacoustictrauma)

Methods(cont.)

• AlsosearchedDefenseTechnicalInformationCenter,andqueried47colleagues

• Only9papersreportedacoustictraumawithexposuredataandaudiometry– 3fromWard1991review– 2fromPubMedsearch– 3fromauthors’files– 1fromreferencelistofpaperfromauthors’files

• PubMedmissedmostofthe9

9informativepapersDavisetal.1950 TTSexperimentLenarz &Gulzow 1983 AcousticreflextestArriaga&Luxford 1993 “Hunteretal.1999 “Elonka 1986 “Orchik etal.1987 CordlessphoneSingletonetal.1984 “Kung&Sataloff2006 SirenMcMillan&Kileny 1994 Bicyclehorn

Page 4: Acoustic Trauma: Minimum Exposures to Continuous Noise...TTS experiments had no PTS after more severe exposures) •All reported AT exposures exceeded OSHA limits; AT is unlikely to

2/20/19

4

Methods(cont.)

• Convertedlevelstoequivalentdiffusefieldlevels(dBA)forcomparabilitytoOSHA,NIOSH,etc.(methodsonrequest;wehopetopublish)

• Ambiguities– Durationssometimeshadtobeestimated– Offendingtone(reflextests)unclear;

chosetonewithhighestdBAlevel– Somelevelmeasurementmethodsunclear– Manyofourcaseslackedpeerreview

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

1 10 100 1000 10000

Equivalentdiffusefie

ldso

undlevel(dB

A)

Exposureduration(sec.)

bikehorn

siren

cordlessphone DavisTTSexperiments

acousticreflex

2.8hours

PTSfromsingleexposures

Page 5: Acoustic Trauma: Minimum Exposures to Continuous Noise...TTS experiments had no PTS after more severe exposures) •All reported AT exposures exceeded OSHA limits; AT is unlikely to

2/20/19

5

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

1 10 100 1000 10000

Equivalentdiffusefie

ldso

undlevel(dB

A)

Exposureduration(sec.)

OSHAPEL

PTSfromsingleexposures

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

1 10 100 1000 10000

Equivalentdiffusefie

ldso

undlevel(dB

A)

Exposureduration(sec.)

OSHAPEL

NIOSHREL

PTSfromsingleexposures

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

1 10 100 1000 10000

Equivalentdiffusefie

ldso

undlevel(dB

A)

Exposureduration(sec.)

OSHAPEL

NIOSHREL

??

??

Tentativelevels/durationscapableofcausingacoustictraumainmostsusceptible

Page 6: Acoustic Trauma: Minimum Exposures to Continuous Noise...TTS experiments had no PTS after more severe exposures) •All reported AT exposures exceeded OSHA limits; AT is unlikely to

2/20/19

6

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

1 10 100 1000 10000

Equivalentdiffusefie

ldso

undlevel(dB

A)

Exposureduration(sec.)

OSHAPELNIOSHREL

??

MRIexposures,LAeq andduration(highkurtosis)

Caveats

• Casereportsareanecdotal• Lowestlevelofmedicalevidence(belowrandomizedtrials,cohort,case-control,cross-sectional,caseseries)

• Specialcaseof“publicationbias”(resultscan’tberegardedastypical)

• Acoustictraumacasesmayrepresenttinyfractionofpopulation(mostsusceptible)

IntenseexposureswithnoPTS:4experiments(89Ss)andanaccident

(somehadverylargeTTS)

• Davisetal1950(n=19)• Eldredetal1955(n=10)• Schori 1976(n=40)• Brownson 1973(n=20)• Raleighetal1963(n=2,aftersteamlinerupture)

Page 7: Acoustic Trauma: Minimum Exposures to Continuous Noise...TTS experiments had no PTS after more severe exposures) •All reported AT exposures exceeded OSHA limits; AT is unlikely to

2/20/19

7

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

1 10 100 1000 10000

Equivalentdiffusefie

ldso

undlevel(dB

A)

Exposureduration(sec.)

PTSindividualcasesandNo-PTSgroups(N=2– 40)

Steamlinerupture

Pinknoise

Pinknoise

Tones,noises

jetenginenoise

CONCLUSIONS

• “Acoustictrauma”(AT)meanspermanentthresholdshiftafterasingleexposure,tobedistinguishedfromoccupationalNIHLandso-called“acousticshock”

• ATcanoccurinfewsecondsatlevels>130dBA,orafter10secondsatlevels>120dBA(ignoringoneoutlier)

• LackofATdoesnotmean“safe”(neuropathy?)• Acousticreflexcaseshadsignificantpriorhearingloss(whichiswhytheyrequiredsuchhighlevels)

Page 8: Acoustic Trauma: Minimum Exposures to Continuous Noise...TTS experiments had no PTS after more severe exposures) •All reported AT exposures exceeded OSHA limits; AT is unlikely to

2/20/19

8

CONCLUSIONS(cont.)

• ATexposureswereatypicalofindustrialnoise(tonalornarrow-band,probablymorehazardousdB-for-dBthanbroad-bandnoise)

• ReportedATcasesprobablyrepresentmostsusceptiblefractionofpopulation(89subjectsinTTSexperimentshadnoPTSaftermoresevereexposures)

• AllreportedATexposuresexceededOSHAlimits;ATisunlikelytooccurincompliantprogramsorafterMRIwithhearingprotection

Acknowledgment

• ChristianGiguere consultedremethodsofestimatingdiffusefieldlevelsfromHLs,couplerlevels,andmannequinlevels

• BillClarkconsultedrehistoricalliteratureinthefieldsofTTSandacoustictrauma

Page 9: Acoustic Trauma: Minimum Exposures to Continuous Noise...TTS experiments had no PTS after more severe exposures) •All reported AT exposures exceeded OSHA limits; AT is unlikely to

2/20/19

9

HypotheticaldistributionofTTS2 aftersingleintensebriefexposure

051015253545

RaresubjectwithTTS2 of50to60dB,thenPTS(acoustictrauma)?

051015253545

1in1000withPTS