The Reservoir of Well-Being

Boss irritates!Boss irritates!Boss irritates!Too much travel

Boss irritates!Too much travel

Boss irritates!Too much travel Unreasonable

demands

Boss irritates!Too much travel Unreasonable

demands

Boss irritates!Too much travel Unreasonable

demands

Difficult colleagues

Conflicting goals Too much

travel

Unreasonable demands

Working with difficult

people

A Study of Well - Being of the Academic Faculty of Colleges of Education

of MES.

Mr. Anthony Gonsalves

Review of the Related Literature A number of Studies on the Well Being of the Employees were reviewed

1. “Impact of Work-related Stress on Well-being among

Academician in Malaysian Research University”

2. “Employment Prospects of Temporary and Permanent Workers:

Associations with Well-being and Work Related Attitudes”

3. “Psychological Well being of Employed Women across Different

Organisations”

4. “Organizational and extra-organizational factors affecting

stress, employee well-being, and absenteeism for males and

females”

Need of the study

•Studies have dealt with the well being of the employees as leading to job satisfaction, in relation to gender differences that are perceived in the workplace and the organisational structure influencing the well being of the employees.

•Studies suggest that the well-being of employees should be in the best interest of the employer.

•Present study is a small attempt to identify the Well-Being of the Academic Faculty of the College of Education

Physical

SocialPsychological

WELL BEING

1. WELL BEING : In the present study the Well - Being of the Employees refers to :

Operational Definitions

2. Academic faculty: The Members of the staff engaged in classroom teaching.

3. Colleges of Education of MES: Colleges running D.T.Ed. & B.Ed courses.

Objectives 1.To study the well being scores of B.Ed. college teachers on the basis of their teaching experiences

2. To study the well being scores of D.T.Ed. college teachers on the basis of their teaching experiences

3. To compare the well being scores of B.Ed. and D.T.Ed. college teachers on the basis of their teaching experiences.

Hypothesis There is no significant difference in the wellbeing scores of B.Ed. college teachers on the basis of their teaching experiences.

There is no significant difference in the wellbeing scores of D.T.Ed. college teachers on the basis of their teaching experiences.

There is no significant difference in the well being scores of B.Ed. and D.T.Ed. college teachers on the basis of their teaching experiences.

3

2

1

Sample

•Technique used :Non-Probability Purposive sampling•The sample size: 44 lecturers from 3 D.T.Ed. and 3 B.Ed. colleges of Education from Mahatma Education Society.

Methodology• Descriptive Survey Research method is used.

Employee Well-being Scale

Items Psychological Social Physical

Positive 9 5 6

Negative 4 3 3

13 8 9

Expe. N Mean SD t -valueSg. Level at 0.01

& 0.05

Below 3 9 95.55 5.89 0.0171 N. Sg

Above 3 13 94.71 10.12

Hypotheses 1

Expe. N Mean SD t -valueSg. Level at 0.01

& 0.05

Above 3 8 94 7.44 -0.713 N.Sg

Below 3 14 96.64 8.22

Hypotheses 2 MEAN SCORES OF D.T.ED. TEACHERS BASED ON EXPERIENCE

MEAN SCORES OF B.ED. TEACHERS BASED ON EXPERIENCE

College N Mean SD t-valueSg. Level at 0.01

& 0.05 level

B.Ed. 22 95.42 8.01 -0.0374 N. Sg

D.T.Ed. 22 95.33 8.29

B.Ed. D.Ed. 0

102030405060708090

10095.42 95.33

8.01 8.29

Mean scores of B.Ed. And D.T.Ed. Teachers

MeanSD

Findings

1. There was no significant difference found in the well-being state of B.Ed. college teachers on the basis of their teaching experiences.2. There is no significant difference found in the well-being state of D.T.Ed. college teachers on the basis of their teaching experiences.

Discussion•Psychologically, opportunities were given for personal growth and aspiration•They were well engaged in the an the institutional activities irrespective of their experience•Social adaptability is found more in the women

• 3. There is no significant difference found in the B.Ed. and D.Ed. college teachers of MES experienced Positive state of Well-being on the basis of their teaching experiences.

Discussion:•This could also be due to 2 factors

Templates

Role of the Management•Security of the employees in terms of job and personal security•Conducive environment•Creating comfort zone

Leadership Role of the Principal•Delegation of Work•Motivation & encouragement•Opportunities for professional development•Clarity of role description

Pressure, stress and Performance Managing psychological well-being at work

Perf

orm

ance

Pressure

Stressed OutSwitched Off

Feel Good Zone

Peak Performance

Physical• Health• Energy

Social• Balance• Fairness

• Connectedness

Psychological• Emotion

•Accomplishment

WELLBEING

Physical Work Environment

Leader/ manager

effectiveness

Rewards and performance

Personal growth and aspiration

Positive working Relationships

Competence & Environmental

Mastery

“The Well-Being Ecosystem”External Environment(Uncontrollable)

Internal Environment(controllable)