A Peek at GCT 2012

40
3 rd Annual Execu.ve Global Clinical Trials Mitchell Katz, Ph.D. Execu3ve Director, Medical Research Opera3ons Purdue Pharma L.P. September 2012

description

3rd Annual Executing Global Clinical Trials, Sept 2012, Mitchell Katz, Purdue Pharma L.P.

Transcript of A Peek at GCT 2012

Page 1: A Peek at GCT 2012

3rd$Annual$Execu.ve$Global$Clinical$Trials$

Mitchell(Katz,(Ph.D.(Execu3ve(Director,(Medical(Research(Opera3ons(

Purdue(Pharma(L.P.(

September(2012(

Page 2: A Peek at GCT 2012

2(

Pharma’s$Largest$Layoffs$in$2012$

Page 3: A Peek at GCT 2012

3(

CRO$Consolida.on$!  INC(

"  Kendle(!  Theorem(

"  Omnicare("  IBAH(

!  Pharmanet/i3("  Inven3ve(Health(

!  Private(Equity("  PPD("  RPS("  PRA(

Page 4: A Peek at GCT 2012

4(

Outsourcing$Buzz$Words$

!  Partnerships(!  Alliances(

!  Preferred(Models(

!  Hybrid(Models(

!  Func3onal(Models(

!  Transac3onal(Models(

!  Offshoring(

!  “Strategic(Rela3onships”(

Page 5: A Peek at GCT 2012

5(

Johnson$&$Johnson$and$ICON$

#1(–(Failure(to(ensure(proper(monitoring(of(the(clinical(inves3ga3ons([21(CFR(312.50(and(312.56(a)(

#2(–(Failure(to(ensure(that(an(inves3ga3on(was(conducted(in(accordance(with(the(general(inves.ga.onal$plan$and(protocols(as(specified(in(the(IND([21(CFR(312.50](

#3(–(Failure(to(secure(inves.gator$compliance$with(the(inves3ga3onal(plan(and(applicable(FDA(regula3ons([21(CFR(312.56(b)](

#4(–(Failure(to(ensure(that(only(inves3gators(who(were(qualified(by(training(and(experience(were(selected(as(appropriate(experts(to(inves3gate(a(drug([21(CFR(212.53(a)](

Page 6: A Peek at GCT 2012

6(

Page 7: A Peek at GCT 2012

7(

It’s$All$About$.$.$.$

(

(

QUALITY$

Page 8: A Peek at GCT 2012

8(

Avoca$Quality$Consor.um$

(Pharma(and(Biotech(members((to(date):(

!  Alexion(Pharmaceu3cals,(Amgen,(Astellas(Pharma,(AstraZeneca,(Biogen(Idec,(BristoldMyers(Squibb,(Cerexa,(Cubist(Pharmaceu3cals,(Daiichi(Sankyo,(Eli(Lilly(and(Company,(GlaxoSmithKline,(Grünenthal,(ImClone(Systems,(Janssen(Research(&(Development,(Otsuka,(Pfizer,(Purdue,(and(Roche(

CRO(members((to(date):(

!  Chiltern(Interna3onal,(Covance,(INC(Research,(ICON,(Harrison(Clinical(Research,(PAREXEL(Interna3onal,(PharmaNet/i3,(PRA(Interna3onal,(Quin3les,(Theorem(Clinical(Research,(and(RPS(

(

Corporate(Sponsors:(

Page 9: A Peek at GCT 2012

Quality$Management$and$CRO$Oversight$

Page 10: A Peek at GCT 2012

10(

Agenda$

!  Overview:(Background(and(context(!  Part$1:(Overall(percep3ons(and(the(“disconnects”(between(sponsors(and(CROs(around(issues(of(quality(

!  Part$2:(Root(causes(of(quality(issues(and(the(issue(of(“micromanagement”(

!  Part$3:(Best(prac3ce(approaches(associated(with(sa3sfac3on(

!  Open(discussion(

Page 11: A Peek at GCT 2012

11(

Context$for$Research$on$Quality$and$CRO$Oversight$!  Increase(in(clinical(outsourcing(

!  Consolida3on(of(spend(with(few(clinical(service(providers(

!  Globaliza3on(of(clinical(trials:(increase(in(number(of(studies(in(lessdexperienced(developing(regions(

!  Focus(on(efficiencies(and(cost(savings(

!  Increase(in(the(number(of(highdprofile(FDA(warning(lemers(

Focus(on(Avoca’s(2011(Industry(Survey:(percep3ons(from(sponsors(and(CROs(on(the(quality(of(outsourced(trials(

Focus(of(Avoca’s(Quality(Consor3um:(proac3ve(quality(management(

The$focus$and$vision$of$the$Quality$Consor5um$are$to$accelerate$the$development$of$an$industry$standard$and$best9prac5ce$approach$to$the$quality$management$of$outsourced$trials$through$the$sharing$of$best$prac5ces$

Page 12: A Peek at GCT 2012

12(

Methods$

!  Surveys(explored(respondents’(views(and(experiences(regarding:(

"  Sa3sfac3on(with(quality(of(work(delivered(by(clinical(service(providers(

"  Approaches(to(managing(quality(in(outsourced(clinical(trials,(including(quality(metrics,(repor3ng(tools,(and(desktop(analy3cs(

"  Scope(and(u3lity(of(Quality(Agreements(

"  Other(tools(used(to(set(expecta3ons(for(quality(in(outsourced(clinical(trials(

"  Quality(concerns(and(management(when(outsourcing(in(Emerging(Markets(

"  Quality(considera3ons(in(selec3ng(CROs(

Page 13: A Peek at GCT 2012

13(

2011$Industry$Survey$

!  104(sponsor(surveys(from(66(companies(

"  73%(pharma,(17%(biotech(

"  52%(“Top(20”(

"  44%(Opera3ons,(40%(Outsourcing(

"  17%(execu3ves,(58%(middle(management((

!  143(provider(surveys(from(88(companies(

"  78%(CROs(

"  64%(“Top(20”(

"  38%(Opera3ons,(31%(BD,(22%(Management(

"  48%(execu3ves,(39%(middle(management((

247(Surveys(

Page 14: A Peek at GCT 2012

14(

Quality$Consor.um$Assessment$

!  428(sponsor(surveys(were(deployed(resul3ng(in(feedback(from(334(individuals(

"  Overall(response(rate:(78%(

"  Completed(surveys/company:(10d46((note(that(there(was(no(associa3on(between(company(size(and(number(of(respondents)(

"  Range(of(response(rates/company:(50%d100%(

!  298(CRO(surveys(were(deployed(resul3ng(in(feedback(from(207(individuals(

"  Overall(response(rate:(69%(

"  Completed(surveys/company:(4d59((note(that(there(was(no(associa3on(between(company(size(and(number(of(respondents)(

"  Range(of(response(rates/company:(27%d100%(

Page 15: A Peek at GCT 2012

Part$1:$$Framing$the$Quality$Issue$

Overall(percep3ons(and(the(“disconnects”(between(sponsors(and(

CROs(around(issues(of(quality(

Page 16: A Peek at GCT 2012

16(

Methods$

!  “Quality”(was(defined(as(“The$ability$to$effec.vely$and$efficiently$answer$the$intended$ques.on$about$the$benefits$and$risks$of$a$medical$product$or$procedure$while$assuring$pa.ent$safety$and$protec.on$of$human$subjects”$

!  As(examples,(elements(of(a(quality(clinical(study(were(said(to(include,(but(not(limited(to:(

"  Scien3fically(valid(and(ethically(sound(experimental(design(

"  Adequate(protec3on(of(subjects’(rights,(safety(and(welfare(

"  Qualified(personnel(

"  Adequate(monitoring(

"  Current,(complete,(and(accurate(data(

"  Accurate(presenta3on(and(interpreta3on(of(data(

Page 17: A Peek at GCT 2012

17(

Industry$Survey$Sponsors:$Overall$Sa.sfac.on$

Page 18: A Peek at GCT 2012

18(

Consor.um$Sponsors:$Sa.sfac.on$with$Quality$

Page 19: A Peek at GCT 2012

19(

Consor.um$Sponsors:$Comparison$of$CRO$Quality$to$Sponsor$Internal$Teams$

Page 20: A Peek at GCT 2012

20(

Sa.sfac.on$with$Quality$

Page 21: A Peek at GCT 2012

21(

Industry$Survey:$Provider$Sa.sfac.on$

Page 22: A Peek at GCT 2012

22(

Sponsors:$Sa.sfac.on$with$Quality$Areas(with(rela3vely(high(sa3sfac3on(included:(

!  Compliance(with(SOPs(and(other(wrimen(procedures(

!  Data$quality$and$integrity$

!  Audit(plans(and(execu3on(

Areas(with(rela3vely(high(dissa3sfac3on(included:(

!  Oversight(of(third(party(vendors(

!  Governance(of(quality(

!  Communica3ons(surrounding(quality(

!  Availability(of(quality(personnel(for(projects(

!  Efficiency/.meliness$in$achieving$clean$data$

!  Adherence(to(monitoring(plan(

Page 23: A Peek at GCT 2012

Part$2:$$Causes$of$Quality$Issues$

Page 24: A Peek at GCT 2012

24(

Causes$of$Issues$with$Quality$

“CROs,$as$service$providers,$are$heavily$incented$to$deliver$and$measure$quality$–$and$are$prepared$to$do$so.$$Too$many$sponsors$are$not$prepared$to$do$their$part$in$assuring$a$rela5onship$focused$on$quality.$$So$CROs$are$forced$to$implement$one$model$for$sponsors$ready$to$focus$on$quality,$and$another$for$the$many$focused$on$ac5vi5es$and$unit9level$cost.”$

( ( (d(Quota3on(from(an(Industry(Survey(Provider(Respondent(

(

(

Page 25: A Peek at GCT 2012

25(

Causes$of$Issues$with$Quality:$Sponsor$Consor.um$Data$

Page 26: A Peek at GCT 2012

26(

Industry$Survey:$Causes$of$Issues$with$Quality$

Page 27: A Peek at GCT 2012

27(

Quality$vs.$Costs$

Page 28: A Peek at GCT 2012

28(

Causes$of$Issues$with$Quality$

#1:$Cost$Pressures$

“The$focus$on$price$has$driven$out$the$reality$of$adequate$monitoring$and$proper$Quality$Control$processes$to$ensure$quality$at$the$site$level…$Too$many$procurement$officers$are$making$decisions$purely$on$cost$without$regards$to$quality$product.”$

“Price$pressures,$especially$discounts…have$caused$some$CROs$to$cut$corners$and$send$work$to$low$cost$regions$without$adequately$trained$staff.”$

“Price$reduc5ons$required$to$‘play$the$game’$in$the$preferred$provider$selec5on$process$make$it$very$difficult$to$con5nue$to$resource$adequately.$$Sponsors$say$they$will$streamline$processes$going$forward$to$reduce$workload$but$hardly$ever$do.”$

Page 29: A Peek at GCT 2012

29(

Causes$of$Issues$with$Quality$#2:(Sponsors(DecisiondMaking(with(Impacts(on(Quality((without(provider(input)(

!  Oversight((level(of(monitoring)(

!  Protocol(design(

!  Inves3gators(&(regions(

!  Timelines(

!  Processes(

!  Thirddparty(vendors(

“It$is$difficult$to$ensure$quality$for$a$func5onal$provider$for$monitoring,$when$the$protocol$design/site$selec5on$are$done$by$another$CRO/sponsor.”$

“There$is$a$percentage$of$work$that$we$perform$that$is$working$with$the$sponsor$processes,$etc…in$these$circumstances,$quality,$5meliness,$training,$governance$and$oversight$are$dictated$by$sponsor$requirements.”$

Page 30: A Peek at GCT 2012

30(

Causes$of$Issues$with$Quality$

#3:$Sponsor$Failure$to$Proac.vely$Make$Decisions$or$Communicate$with$Providers$about$Quality$Expecta.ons$

Industry(survey(data:(

!  Only(55%(of(sponsors(are(sa3sfied(with(their(companies’(iden3fica3on(of(process/deliverables(for(which(quality(expecta3ons(of(CROs(need(to(be(set.(

!  Only(58%(feel(that(their(companies(effec3vely(communicate(quality(expecta3ons(to(CROs(

!  Strong(associa3on(between(“proac3ve”(management(of(quality(and(ability(to(forego(micromanagement.(

Page 31: A Peek at GCT 2012

Part$3:$$Results$What(can(be(done(to(enhance(quality(while(

reducing(micromanagement?(

What$quality$prac.ces$are$associated$with$enhanced$sa.sfac.on?$

Page 32: A Peek at GCT 2012

32(

Industry$Survey$Sponsors:$Quality$Metrics$

Page 33: A Peek at GCT 2012

33(

Consor.um$Survey:$Quality$Metrics$

Page 34: A Peek at GCT 2012

34(

Quality$Agreements$

Page 35: A Peek at GCT 2012

35(

Industry$Survey$Sponsors:$Quality$Agreements$

Page 36: A Peek at GCT 2012

36(

Industry$Survey$Sponsors:$Quality$Agreements$

Page 37: A Peek at GCT 2012

37(

Other$Prac.ces$Impac.ng$Quality$

Risk$Based$Approaches$

!  57%(of(sponsors(and(58%(of(CROs(use(a(formal,(riskdbased(approach(to(levels(of(site(monitoring((industry(survey(data)("  About(2/3(have(had(primarily(posi3ve(experiences(–(1/3(mixed(

!  Most(sponsors((67%)(and(CROs((79%)(do(maintain(documenta3on(of(site(performance(on(previous(trials(to(factors(into(such(models.("  Performance(data(most(commonly(includes(number(of(protocol(

viola3ons,(number(of(queries,(type(and(severity(of(protocol(viola3ons,(promptness(of(data(entry,(types(of(queries,(and(3me(to(resolu3on(of(queries.(

Page 38: A Peek at GCT 2012

38(

Quality$by$Region$

Page 39: A Peek at GCT 2012

39(

Summary$

!  While(developing(standards(and(more(efficient(ways(for(sponsors(and(CROs(to(work(together(is(necessary,(it(has(been(challenging.(

!  There(is(greater(poten3al(for(success(in(terms(of(the(ability(to(quickly(move(towards(standards:(

( ( (Quality(Agreements(( ( (Quality(Metrics(

!  There(is(no(onedsize(fits(all(CRO(model(

Page 40: A Peek at GCT 2012

Open$Discussion$

(

Thank(You(