Central Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology

Cite this article: Gill D, Daniel R, Halpern L, Southerland J (2016) A Giant Submandibular Sialolith in the Setting of Chronic Sialodenitis: A Case Report and Literature Review. Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol 3(8): 1128.

*Corresponding author

Danielle Gill, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA, Tel: 1 (615) 327-6844; Fax: 1 (615) 327-5722; Email:

Submitted: 11 June 2016

Accepted: 04 July 2016

Published: 19 July 2016

ISSN: 2379-948X

Copyright© 2016 Gill et al.

OPEN ACCESS

Keywords•Giant sialolith•Megalith•Chronic Sialadenitis•Treatment of giant sialoliths

Case Report

A Giant Submandibular Sialolith in the Setting of Chronic Sialodenitis: A Case Report and Literature ReviewDanielle Gill*, Robin Daniel, Leslie Halpern, and Janet SoutherlandDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Meharry Medical College, USA

Abstract

Sialolithiasis affects about 1% of the population and represents over 50% of disease that are associated with major salivary glands. Although the etiologies of sialolithiasis have been heavily debated, most agree that there is a multifactorial causation. Most authors conclude that salivary stones are formed from the deposition of calcium salts within the ductal system of salivary glands usually originating from desquamated epithelial cells, foreign bodies, microorganisms, and/or mucous plugs. Sialolith size varies from 6mm to 8cm. Those larger than 1.5cm have been deemed “giant sialoliths”, or megaliths. There are only 13 reported cases of sialoliths greater than 55mm. These appear to occur largely in the submandibular glands, and have a male predilection. We report a case of a giant sialolith in a 48-year-old African-American male presenting with a chronic sialadenitis, followed by a literature review of giant sialolith pathology and options for treatment.

ABBREVIATIONScm: Centimeters; mm: Millimeters; CT: Computed

Tomography

INTRODUCTIONSialolithiasis is considered to be the most common non-

neoplastic salivary disorder and represents about 50% of all major salivary gland disease [1]. This benign disorder has a relatively low prevalence at roughly 1% of the population with symptomatic sialolithiasis occurring at a rate of 0.45% [1-3]. The etiology of the sialolith is both controversial and multifactorial with some suggesting that sialolith formation is precipitated/exacerbated by the presence of desquamated epithelial cells, foreign bodies, microorganisms, and/ or mucous plugs within the ductal canal, potentially creating a nidus for calcium deposition, as well as other etiologic agents [1]. For example, stasis of saliva due to the course of the ductal system or the nidus itself, can enhance the development of a salivary stone [2]. Other precipitating factors that predispose sialolithiasis are metabolic; i.e. Gout [1].

We present a case report that describes a giant sialolith in the left submandibular region with perforation of floor of oral cavity, as well as discernable facial asymmetry. Clinical presentation, radiographic, and histologic features are discussed, as well as

management options followed by a review of the literature.

CASE PRESENTATION

HPI/Clinical Presentation

A 48-year-old African American male presented to the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic at Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN with a complaint of facial pain and swelling associated with the left submandibular region. The patient reported three months of progressive swelling, and recent persistent pain during mealtime. The patient recorded a 10-pound weight loss, however denied nausea, vomiting, fever, chills, paresthesias and dyspnea.

Past medical and surgical histories included obesity and left foot 5th digit osteomyelitis secondary to nail injury treated by incision and drainage and followed by amputation of left foot digit. The patient denied any allergies. Social history included smoking one pack of cigarettes every other day for over 20 years and drinking beer or wine weekly. Family history was non-contributory.

Head and neck examination revealed moderate asymmetry of the left neck predominately in the submandibular region (Figure 1A). The area was solid and tender to palpation. No extra-oral erythema or purulence was noted. In addition, there was no associated lymphadenopathy or temporomandibular associated

Central

Gill et al. (2016)Email:

Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol 3(8): 1128 (2016) 2/7

pathologies. Maximum incisal opening was approximately 30mm, with guarding due to pain. Intraoral exam revealed an oropharynx that was clear, a uvula that was midline with no associated palatal draping. The left posterior floor of the mouth exhibited a perforation of approximately 2cm as well as a large, plaque-covered, movable calculus (Figure 1B). In addition, the entire left floor of mouth was mildly elevated, indurated and tender to palpation.

Panoramic imaging revealed a large, oblong radiopaque mass superimposed on the left mandibular angle (Figure 2). Computed tomography (CT) scan of the region showed a heterogeneous enhancement and mild generalized enlargement of the left submandibular gland. Centered within the posterior aspect of the gland, and extending to the floor of the mouth along the course of Wharton’s duct, there appeared to be a densely calcified stone measuring 2.1 x 4.3 x 3.1 cm (Figures 3A,3B).

Differential Diagnosis

A working differential diagnosis was developed based on the patient’s medical history, symptomatology, clinical presentation, and radiographic findings. The following were suggested as possible differential diagnoses: Sialolithiasis with a concomitant left submandibular chronic sialadenitis, foreign body, calcified lymph node, vascular calcification, osteomas, myositis ossificans, and/or a calcified neoplasm [4]. Sialolithiasis was deemed to be the most definitive diagnosis based upon the work-up presented.

Hospital Course

The patient was consented and taken to the operating room with a diagnosis of chronic sialolithiasis/chronic sialadenitis of the left submandibular gland. The treatment plan was to explore the ductal pathway along the left floor of the mouth, as well as a left submandibular gland sialadenectomy, and left sialolithectomy. The gland was accessed via a modified Risdon approach and found to be fibrotic upon evaluation. Further dissection along Wharton’s duct revealed a grossly dilated duct. The distal portion of the duct was then ligated and the gland was then removed. With further manipulation the proximal duct, there was no success with retrieving the sialolith and it was subsequently dislodged through the floor of the mouth into the oral cavity, via a tear in Wharton’s duct leaving a large perforation through the floor of the mouth. The proximal duct was then ligated. The perforation was closed intraorally with 3-0 resorbable, synthetic suture. The submandibular gland, attached duct, and sialolith were sent for final gross pathologic/histological evaluation.

Histology of specimen

A gross examination of the specimen identified a giant sialolith that measured, 5.7cm x 2.3cm x 2.2cm and the left submandibular gland specimen (Figure 4). The submandibular gland presented as a rubbery tan nodule weighing 20 grams, measuring 4.5cm x 3.0cm x 2.3cm. Histological examination of the submandibular gland showed lobules separated by dense fibrous connective tissue. The lobules contained glands composed of both serous and mucus cells and small ductiles. A dense chronic inflammatory infiltrate extended to the lobules and also in the surrounding dense fibrotic stroma (Figures 5A, 5B, 5C). No neoplastic or

Figure 1 Preoperative extraoral and intraoral photographs. (A) – Moderate left-sided lower facial swelling present (B) - Calculus perforated through floor of mouth. Limited opening.

Figure 2 Panoramic View: Large radiopaque mass superimposed on left posterior mandible.

Figure 3 CT Maxillofacial w/ Contrast (A) – Coronal View: Large oblong radiopaque mass associated with left submandibular gland. Gland is markedly enlarged. Left facial asymmetry appreciated. (B) - Sagittal View: Large radiopaque mass roughly 3cm in height.

dysplastic changes were identified during examination.

The above findings characterized a definitive diagnosis of a giant sialolith arising from an associated chronic sialadenitis of the left submandibular gland. The patient returned to our clinic at 2 weeks for a surgical follow-up. Healing was uneventful and the patient was satisfied with treatment.

DISCUSSION Sialolithiasis affects about 1% of the population and

represents over 50% of diseases that are associated with the major salivary glands [1]. The average age at diagnosis is 30-70 years [5]. Although all major and minor salivary glands can

Central

Gill et al. (2016)Email:

Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol 3(8): 1128 (2016) 3/7

be involved, the submandibular gland is involved in 80-90% of cases [4, 6]. Symptoms can be diverse, depending on the gland involved and the location and size of the sialolith and tend to become exacerbated at mealtime [7]. Some patients may deny any associated symptomatology at presentation [8]. Swelling has been reported in over 94% of cases; pain in 65.2%; purulence in 15.5% of cases [1].

Although a good physical exam can predictably give practitioners a definitive diagnosis, the role of imaging with diagnosing sialolithiasis is also important to consider. Plain film is a valid method of obtaining information; however it may not be the most predictable imaging modality in the diagnosis of sialolithiasis. Due to the various compositions, stones can be radiopaque or radiolucent. It is estimated that 80% of submandibular stones are radiopaque, while parotid and sublingual stones are 40% and 20% respectively [1]. Computed Tomography (CT) and/ or MRI might be indicated when high suspicion of sialolithiasis is present, but no pathology is noted on plain films. Not only can these images help rule out other disorders, glandular involvement can also be accessed [1].

Several theories have been described as to why there is a predilection for the submandibular gland. One reason may be the inferior positioning to Wharton’s duct making the flow of saliva against the force of gravity [1]. In addition, the tortuous path of Wharton’s duct, with its two acute bends, may predispose the submandibular ductal system to the development of sialolithiasis [1,7]. The length of Wharton’s duct increases the transit time

of saliva and is the most significant factor in the formation of salivary stones [1]. This anatomy also lends to the increased viscosity of the saliva and relatively high content of calcium salts, specifically phosphates, carbonates, and oxalates which make the submandibular gland more prone to stone formation. Most of the giant sialoliths reported in the article were associated with the submandibular gland and were within the ductal system, with only 26% found in the gland parenchyma [2, 9, 10].

Sialoliths are thought to enlarge at the rate of approximately 1–1.5 mm per year, although some reports show a rate of 3.5mm per year [11]. Stones larger than 3 cm are extremely rare (Table 1). Mean size is roughly 7.3mm, but stones greater than 8cm have been documented [6, 66]. There are only 13 cases of sialoliths greater than 55mm. The largest giant sialolith reported was 83mm in length and located within the submandibular duct [66]. Perforation through the duct and floor of the mouth by a large stone is rare, but has also been reported and is also one of the key features of this clinical presentation [44, 60, 71, 72]. Epidemiologic studies suggest that the vast majority of giant sialoliths have a male predilection, with women only representing 9.7% in this review sample size. The youngest patient in this sample is 10 and oldest is 75 years of age [71, 72].

Figure 6 depicts an algorithm for the management of patients that present with sialolithiasis. Treatment options are based upon size, location, sialolith number and associated function of the gland [1,2]. A main goal of therapy is to perform a sialolithotomy with retention of the gland and the restoration of salivary flow [73]. A newly developed method using filter paper incorporating the chromophore of melanoidin or stimuli such as capsaicin and citric acid can be useful for evaluation of residual salivary gland function and screening for hyposalivation [73]. Alternative therapies involve conservative measures such as hydration, heat, massage, and sialagogues might be effective measures along with flushing or milking the stone from the duct [7]. Systemic antibiotics may be beneficial, especially in cases with acute episodes of sialadenitis [1].

Sialoliths located within the gland or hilums are most commonly managed with a sialadenectomy. The decision to excise a gland is based on size of the sialolith and its location with the gland, as well as difficulty of retrieval of the salivary stone

Figure 4 Final Specimen. Rogue intact sialolith and left submandibular gland.

Figure 5 H&E Stain (A) – Chronic sialodenitis and dilated major salivary gland duct with epithelial hyperplasia and lymphoid follicles and chronic inflammatory cells in the duct wall (4x). (B) – Chronic sialodenitis and dilated major salivary gland duct with epithelial hyperplasia and lymphoid follicles and chronic inflammatory cells in the duct wall (10x). (C) – Chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate in submandibular gland destroying gland parenchyma.

Figure 6 Cartoon schematic outlining treatment options for submandibular sialolithiasis.

Central

Gill et al. (2016)Email:

Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol 3(8): 1128 (2016) 4/7

Table 1: Review of Giant Sialoliths.

Study Gender Age(Years) Gland Location Size (mm)

1 Meyers (1942) [12] Male 50 Submandibular Duct 502 Mustard (1945) [13] Male 42 Submandibular Duct 563 Guernsey (1953) [9] Female 65 NR Parenchyma 334 Allen (1956) [14] Male 49 Submandibular Duct 355 Cavina/ Santoli (1965) [15] Male 59 Submandibular Duct 706 Cavina/ Santoli (1965) [15] Male 53 Submandibular Both 607 Hoggins (1968) [10] Male 52 Submandibular Parenchyma 508 Rust/ Messerly (1969) [16] Male 66 Parotid Duct 519 Rust/ Messerly (1969) [16] Male 58 Submandibular Parenchyma 3510 Brusati (1973) [17] Male 55 Submandibular Parenchyma 3111 Raskin, et al (1975) [18] Male 52 Submandibular Duct 5512 Zakaria (1981) [19] Male 70 Submandibular Parenchyma 3313 Koshal/ Naik (1982) [20] Male 40 Submandibular Duct 5014 Isacsson/ Persson (1982) [21] Male 48 Submandibular Duct 3615 Naraynsingh (1985) [22] Male 28 Submandibular Parenchyma 6016 Frame/ Smith (1986) [23] Male 50 Submandibular Parenchyma 3017 Kaltman/ Eichner (1987) [24] Male 53 Submandibular Parenchyma 4518 Lakhoo/ Mannell (1989) 25] Male 37 Submandibular Duct 6519 Tinsley (1989) [26] Male 48 Submandibular Parenchyma 5020 Bamgbelu (1989) [27] Male 55 Submandibular Duct 3521 Asfar, et al (1989) [28] Male 55 Submandibular Parenchyma 3822 Hubar, et al (1990) [29] Male 65 Submandibular Duct 5223 Martin, et al (1990) [30] Male 60 Submandibular Parenchyma 6024 Akin/ Esmer (1991) [31] Male 45 Submandibular Parenchyma 4525 Iqbal, et al (1992) [32] Female 48 Parotid Duct 3026 Paul/ Chauhan (1995) [33] Male 45 Submandibular Duct 45 27 Udagatti/ Chandra (1997) [34] Male 75 Submandibular Parenchyma 6028 Kesse, et al (1998) [35] Male 64 Parotid Parenchyma 5029 Eiraku, et al (1999) [36] Male 56 Submandibular Duct 51 30 Bodner (2002) [37] Male 50 Submandibular Duct 5031 Bodner (2002) [37] Male 46 Submandibular Duct 3232 Bodner (2002) [37] Male 25 Submandibular Duct 3233 Bodner (2002) [37] Male 45 Submandibular Duct 3034 Siddiqui (2002) [38] Female 52 Submandibular Duct 3035 Vittal et al (2002) [39] Male 70 Submandibular Duct 6036 Sutay et al. (2003) [40] Female 22 Submandibular Parenchyma 3737 Akimoto et al.(2004) [41] Male 70 Submandibular Duct 4538 Raveenthiran/ Rao (2004) [42] Female 10 Submandibular Duct 3539 Yildirim (2004) [43] Male 56 Submandibular Parenchyma 30 40 Chan/ Patel (2006) [44] Male 27 Submandibular Duct 3541 Ledesma-Montes, et al (2007) [45] Male 34 Submandibular Duct 3642 Alkurt/ Peker (2009) [46] Male 65 Submandibular Duct 3143 Rai/ Burman (2009) [47] Male 60 Submandibular Duct 7244 Patil, et al (2009) [48] Male 50 Submandibular Duct 3845 Emegoakor, et al (2009) [49] Male 65 Submandibular Duct 5046 Krishnan, et al (2009) [50] Male 41 Submandibular Duct 3447 Huang, et al (2009) 4 [4] Male 57 Submandibular Duct 4048 El Gehani, et al (2010) [51] Male 41 Submandibular Duct 3549 El Gehani, et al (2010) [51] Male 48 Submandibular Parenchyma 3050 Khen/ Abdeen (2010) [52] Male 53 Submandibular Duct 3351 Gungormus et al. (2010) [53] Male 59 Sublingual Parenchyma 3252 Silva-Junior et al. (2010) [54] Male 58 Submandibular Duct 3553 Cottrell et al. (2011) [55] Male 75 Submandibular Duct 3054 Leite et al. (2011) [56] Female 54 Submandibular Duct 35

Central

Gill et al. (2016)Email:

Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol 3(8): 1128 (2016) 5/7

55 Babu/ Jain (2011) [57] Male 50 Submandibular Duct 6256 Iqbal, et al (2012) [58] Male 55 Submandibular Duct 3557 Fowell/ MacBean (2012) [59] Male 58 Submandibular Duct 4158 Rauso, et al (2012) [60] Male 56 Submandibular Duct 5659 Tyagi, et al (2013) [11 ] Male 69 Submandibular Duct 3560 Pandarakalam, et al (2013) [61] Male 68 Submandibular Duct 4061 Goyal, et al (2013) [62] Male 40 Submandibular Duct 5062 Singh (2013) [63] Male 55 Submandibular Duct 3763 Banerjee et al.(2013) [64] Male 50 Submandibular Duct 3564 Rodrigues (2014) 73 [65] Female 48 Submandibular Duct 4565 Shahoon, et al (2015) [66] Male 25 Submandibular (Bilateral) Duct 50, 3066 Shahoon, et al (2015) [66] Male 30 Submandibular Duct 8367 Arslan, et al (2015) [2] Male 42 Submandibular Parenchyma 3568 Sari/ Sahin (2015) [67] Male 55 Submandibular Duct 4069 Demircan (2015) [68] Male 62 Submandibular Duct 3070 Bhullar (2015) [69] Male 45 Submandibular Duct 3171 Akinyamoju/ Adisa [70] Male 54 Submandibular Duct 4472 Omezli et al. (2016) [71] Male 35 Submandibular Duct 3773 Present Case Male 48 Submandibular Duct 57Abbreviations: mm: millimeters; NR: Not reported

and/or structural damage of the gland [1,2]. The excision of the submandibular gland has low morbidity, with few complications [74].

More recent minimally invasive surgical techniques used in the treatment of sialolithiasis include surgical sialolithotomy with or without sialodochoplasty, sialoendoscopy with sialolithotomy, intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy [7]. For giant sialoliths, Transoral sialolithotomy with sialodochoplasty or sialadenectomy may be the preferred management [73].

The rate of recurrence for sialolithiasis has been reported to be 8.9% [75,76]. Recurrence of sialoliths after gland excision has also been reported [77,78]. Failure to recognize stones upon exploration would be the most simplistic explanation; however it has been proposed that there may be a communication between the sublingual glandular complex and the submandibular duct allowing for future sialolith formation.

CONCLUSIONGiven the size of the stone, dilation of the duct, lack of function

of the gland due to its chronic state of sialodenitis, removal of the gland became our most predictable treatment option for this particular case. Treatment of Giant sialoliths, although rare, especially in the setting of chronic sialodenitis should be considered and treated appropriately depending on presentation.

REFERENCES1. Carlson E, Ord R. Salivary Gland Pathology: Diagnosis and Management.

2nd edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2016.

2. Arslan S, Vuralkan E, Cobanoglu B, Arslan A, Ural A. Giant sialolith of submandibular gland: report of a case. J Surg Case Rep. 2015; 2015.

3. Marchal F, Kurt AM, Dulguerov P, Lehmann W. Retrograde theory in sialolithiasis formation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 127: 66-68.

4. Huang TC, Dalton JB, Monsour FN, Savage NW. Multiple, large sialoliths of the submandibular gland duct: a case report. Aust Dent J. 2009; 54:

61-65.

5. Acharya S, Goyal A, Bhalla AS, Sharma R, Seth A, Gupta AK. In vivo characterization of urinary calculi on dual-energy CT: going a step ahead with sub-differentiation of calcium stones. Acta Radiol. 2015; 56: 881-889.

6. Capaccio P, Torretta S, Ottavian F, Sambataro G, Pignataro L. Modern management of obstructive salivary diseases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007; 27: 161-172.

7. Neville, B, Damm, D, Alen CM, Angela CC. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 4th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2016.

8. Williams MF. Sialolithiasis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1999; 32: 819-834.

9. Guernsey LH. Giant sialolith; report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1953; 6: 1230-1232.

10. Hoggins GS. Large calcified mass in the submaxillary gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1968; 25: 679-681.

11. Tyagi, S, Yadav, S, Kumar P, Bhandari PP. Large intraductal sialolith in Wharton’s duct. SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences. 2013; 4: 43.

12. Meyers H. Large calculus in submaxillary gland. Dent Dig 1942; 48: 420.

13. Mustard T. Calculus of unusual size in Wharton’s duct. Br Dent J 1945; 79: 129.

14. Allen NE. A sialolith within the submaxillary duct and gland: report of case. J Oral Surg (Chic). 1956; 14: 65-67.

15. Cavina C, Santoli A. Some cases of salivary calculi of particular interest. Minerva Stomatol. 1965; 14: 90-95.

16. Rust TA, Messerly CD. Oddities of salivary calculi. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969; 28: 862-865.

17. Brusati R, Fiamminghi L. Large calculus of the submandibular gland: report of case. J Oral Surg. 1973; 31: 710-711.

18. Raksin SZ, Gould SM, Williams AC. Submandibular duct sialolith of unusual size and shape. J Oral Surg. 1975; 33: 142-145.

19. Zakaria MA. Giant calculi of the submandibular salivary gland. Br J

Central

Gill et al. (2016)Email:

Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol 3(8): 1128 (2016) 6/7

Oral Surg. 1981; 19: 230-232.

20. Koshal KD, Naik RS. Giant submaxillary sialolith. J Indian Med Assoc. 1981; 77: 14-15.

21. Isacsson G, Persson NE. The giganti form salivary calculus. Int J Oral Surg. 1982; 11: 135-139.

22. Naraynsingh V. Giant submandibular gland calculi. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985; 43: 384-385.

23. Frame JW, Smith AJ. Large calculi of the submandibular salivary glands. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986; 15: 769-771.

24. Kaltman S, Eichner M. Giant sialolithiasis appearing as odontogenic infection. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987; 115: 425-426.

25. Lakhoo K, Mannell A. Giant submandibular calculus. A case report. S Afr J Surg. 1989; 27: 187-189.

26. Tinsley G. An extraordinarily large asymptomatic submandibular salivary calculus. Br Dent J. 1989; 166: 199.

27. Bamgbelu O. A giant submandibular sialolith: management and complications. Dent Update. 1989; 16: 399-400.

28. Asfar SK, Steitiyeh MR, Abdul-Amir R. Giant salivary calculi: an orocervical fistula caused by a submandibular gland calculus. Can J Surg. 1989; 32: 295-296.

29. Hubar JS, Guggenheimer J, Evan M. “Megalith”. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990; 70: 245.

30. Martín Peña F, Alonso Treceño JL, Escapa Garrachón J, Capa F. Giant calculus of the submaxillary gland. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1990; 41: 265-267.

31. Akin I, Esmer N. A submandibular sialolith of unusual size: a case report. J Otolaryngol. 1991; 20: 123-125.

32. Iqbal SM, Murthy JG, Sharma N. Giant parotid calculus--an unusual presentation. J Laryngol Otol. 1992; 106: 446-447.

33. Paul D, Chauhan SR. Salivary megalith with a sialo-cutaneous and a sialo-oral fistula: a case report. J Laryngol Otol. 1995; 109: 767-769.

34. Udagatti V, Chandra S. Giant sialolith (megalith) of submandibular salivary gland. J Laryngol Otol 1997; 109: 767-69.

35. Kesse WK, Shehab ZP, Courteney-Harris R. A megalith of the parotid salivary gland. J Laryngol Otol. 1998; 112: 784-785.

36. Eiraku D, Al e. A case of large intraductal sialolith. Abstract of 53rd Annual Meeting of Japanese Stomatological Society 1999; No. I-F-53.

37. Bodner L. Giant salivary gland calculi: diagnostic imaging and surgical management. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002; 94: 320-323.

38. Siddiqui SJ. Sialolithiasis: an unusually large submandibular salivary stone. Br Dent J. 2002; 193: 89-91.

39. Vittal, U, Shetty, S, et al. Giant Sialolith (megalith) of submandibular salivary gland. Australian Journal of Oto-Laryngology. 2002; 5: 43.

40. Sutay S, Erdag TK, Ikiz AO, Guneri EA. Large submandibular gland calculus with perforation of the floor of the mouth. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 128: 587-588.

41. Akimoto, Y, Sakae, Cehie Toyoda, Makiko Ono, Kazuhiro Hasegawa, I Shigeo Tanaka T, et al. An unusually large submandibular salivary calculus: Case report and structural analysis. 1nt J Oral-Med Sci. 2004; 2: 50-53.

42. Raveenthiran V, Hayavadana Rao PV. Giant calculus in the submandibular salivary duct: report of the first prepubertal patient. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004; 20: 163-164.

43. Yildirim A. A case of giant sialolith of the submandibular salivary gland. Ear Nose Throat J. 2004; 83: 360-631.

44. Chan EK, Patel ND. Giant calculus of the submandibular salivary duct. Ear Nose Throat J. 2006; 85: 306, 308.

45. Ledesma-Montes C, Garcés-Ortíz M, Salcido-García JF, Hernández-Flores F, Hernández-Guerrero JC. Giant sialolith: case report and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 128-130.

46. Alkurt MT, Peker I. Unusually large submandibular sialoliths: report of two cases. Eur J Dent. 2009; 3: 135-139.

47. Rai M, Burman R. Giant submandibular sialolith of remarkable size in the comma area of Wharton’s duct: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67: 1329-1332.

48. Patil S, Sharma S, Prasad L. Submandibular megalith with erosion of the floor of mouth-A rare case report. World Articles in Ear, Nose and Throat 2009; 2.

49. Emegoakor C, Chianakwana GU, et al. An Unusually Large Submandibular Gland Stone. A Case Report. Nigerian Journal of Surgery. 2009; 12:1-3.

50. Krishnan B, Gehani RE, Shehumi MI. Submandibular giant sialoliths-2 case reports and review of the literature. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 61: 55-58.

51. El Gehani R, Krishnan B, Shehoumi MI. Submandibular giant sialoliths: report of two cases and review of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J. 2010; 89: 1-4.

52. Khen A, Abdeen B. An unusual large submandibular gland calculus: A case report. Smile Dental Journal. 2010; 5: 14-17.

53. Güngörmüş M, Yavuz MS, Yolcu U. Giant sublingual sialolith leading to dysphagia. J Emerg Med. 2010; 39: 129-130.

54. Silva-Junior GO, Picciani, B, Andrade VM, Ramos RT, Cantisano MH. Asymptomatic large sialolith of Wharton’s duct: a case report. International journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine. 2010; 3: 208-210.

55. Cottrell D, Courtney M, Bhatia I, Gallagher G, Sundararajan D. Intraoral removal of a giant submandibular sialolith obstructing Wharton’s duct: a case report. J Mass Dent Soc. 2011; 60: 14-16.

56. Leite TC, Blei V, Oliveira DP, Robaina FT, Janini MER, Meirelles V. Giant asymptomatic sialolithiasis. International Journal of Oral-Medical Sciences. 2011; 10: 175-178.

57. Lokesh Babu KT. Giant Submandibular Sialolith: A Case Report and Review of Literature. International Journal of Head & Neck Surgery 2011; 2: 154-157.

58. Iqbal A, Gupta AK, Natu SS, Gupta AK. Unusually large sialolith of Wharton’s duct. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 2: 70-73.

59. Fowell C, MacBean A. Giant salivary calculi of the submandibular gland. J Surg Case Rep. 2012; 2012: 6.

60. Rauso R, Gherardini G, Biondi P, Tartaro G, Colella G. A case of a giant submandibular gland calculus perforating the floor of the mouth. Ear Nose Throat J. 2012; 91: E25-27.

61. Pandarakalam C, Goebel WM, Seyer B. Chronic sclerosing sialadenitis or Küttner’s tumor associated with a giant sialolith: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013; 115: 38-40.

62. Goyal L, Salim M, Saini S. Rare giant submandibular gland calculus: a case report. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2013; 2: 8823-8826.

63. Singh S, Singh S. Submandibular gland megalith eroding the floor of the mouth: a case report. Ear Nose Throat J. 2013; 92: E17-19.

Central

Gill et al. (2016)Email:

Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol 3(8): 1128 (2016) 7/7

Gill D, Daniel R, Halpern L, Southerland J (2016) A Giant Submandibular Sialolith in the Setting of Chronic Sialodenitis: A Case Report and Literature Review. Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol 3(8): 1128.

Cite this article

64. Banerjee K, Chattopadhyay S, Arora R, Bajpai Banerjee S. Surgical removal of a submandibular megalith. BMJ Case Rep. 2013; 2013.

65. Rodrigues G, Carvalho V, Alves F, Junior C, Jaguar G. Giant Submandibular Sialolith: Case Report. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2014; 117: 159.

66. Shahoon H, Farhadi S, Hamedi R. Giant sialoliths of Wharton duct: Report of two rare cases and review of literature. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015; 12: 494-497.

67. Sari K, Sahin C. Giant Submandibular Gland Duct Sialolith: A Case Report. Kafkas J Med Sci. 2015; 5: 75-77.

68. Demircan S, Isler S. Case reports: Giant sialolith. Br Dent J. 2015; 219: 48.

69. Bhullar RS, Dhawan A, Bhullar K, Malhotra S. Giant submandibular gland duct sialolith mimicking an impacted canine tooth. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 6: 89-92.

70. Akinyamoju AO, Adisa AO. Non-surgical extraction of a massive sialolith in the Wharton’s duct of a Nigerian. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2015; 44: 177-180.

71. Omezli MM, Ayranci F, Sadik E, Polat ME. Case report of giant sialolith (megalith) of the Wharton’s duct. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016; 19: 414-417.

72. Kurtoglu G, Durmusoglu M, Ecevit M. Submandibular Sialolithiasis Perforating the Floor of Mouth: A Case Report. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 53: 35-7.

73. Kanehira T, Hongou H, Asano K, Morita M, Maeshima E, Matsuda A, et al. A simple test for salivary gland function measuring resting and stimulated submandibular and sublingual secretions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014; 117: 197-203.

74. De Carvalho AS, Dedivitis RA, de Castro MA, Nardi CE. Submandibular gland excision. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2015; 42: 14-17.

75. Ying X, Kang J, Zhang F, Dong H. Recurrent sialoliths after excision of the bilateral submandibular glands for sialolithiasis treatment: A case report. Exp Ther Med. 2016; 11: 335-337.

76. Lustmann J, Regev E, Melamed Y. Sialolithiasis. A survey on 245 patients and a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990; 19: 135-138.

77. Markiewicz MR, Margarone JE 3rd, Tapia JL, Aguirre A. Sialolithiasis in a residual Wharton’s duct after excision of a submandibular salivary gland. J Laryngol Otol. 2007; 121: 182-185.

78. Zhang L, Xu H, Cai ZG, Mao C, Wang Y, Peng X. Clinical and anatomic study on the ducts of the submandibular and sublingual glands. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68: 606-610.