9. paed romania denkstatt

denkstatt GmbH

Hietzinger Hauptstrasse 28 · A-1130 Vienna · Austria

T (+43)1 786 89 00 F (+43)1 786 89 00-15

E [email protected] W www.denkstatt.at

denkstatt Romania

P-ta Unirii nr. 6, Timisoara, Romania

T (+40) 256 434397 F (+40) 256 434397

E [email protected] W www.denkstatt.ro

FISTIS GABRIELA

Managing Director denkstatt Romania

01.10.2014, BARCELONA

Local successful measures / SEAP

implementation

Lessons learned, impact and results related

to the development / implementation of

SEAP to the municipal level

Filosofia Denkstatt Romania

denkstatt stands for

economic success through

ecological innovation and

social responsibility

Compania / Company

Denkstatt Romania is part of the consulting firms Denkstatt, one of the largest consulting company offering services in the field of sustainable development and environmental management. The solutions we offer, developed in close cooperation with our customers and public sector industries, ensures that the decisions we take today will meet the challenges of tomorrow.

Projects implemented for our customers in the industrial sector focusing on increasing operational efficiency of ecologically, socially and economically.

Public sector organizations rely on services provided by Denkstatt for projects involving the preparation and implementation of government policies, development strategies, etc. Over the course of these projects, Denkstatt shall ensure that the solutions offered are widely accepted in the public domain.

Locatii denkstatt

DENKSTATT Hungary Környezettechnológiai és -management Tanácsadó Kft. 1133 Budapest, Árboc utca 4., Hungary Tel.: + 36 12391206 Email: [email protected] Web: www.denkstatt.hu

Denkstatt GmbH Hietzinger Hauptstraße 28 1130 Vienna, Austria Tel.: +43 178689000 Email: [email protected] Web: www.denkstatt.at

Denkstatt Romania SRL Piata Unirii Nr. 6 300085 – Timisoara, Romania Tel.: +40 256434397 Email: [email protected] Web: www.denkstatt.ro

Denkstatt Bulgaria OOD 115 Arsenalski blvd., ent. 1, fl. 5, app. 7 1421 Sofia, Bulgaria Tel.: +35 924707508 Email: [email protected]

Web: www.denkstatt.bg

Denkstatt Slovensko s.r.o. City Business Center, Karadžičova 8 821 08 Bratislava, Slovakia Tel.: +421 233666870 Email: [email protected] Web: www.denkstatt.sk

DENKSTATT España S.L. C/ Pintor Picasso 6, 1° D 28807 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain Tel.: +34 620318001 Email: [email protected] Web.: www.denkstatt.es

Denkstatt Serbia (Project Office) Brace Ribnikara 8/VI/67 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia Email: [email protected]

Sustainable Products and Services

Sustainable Development

Climate Protection & Energy

Management Systems

Social Design

Waste & Resources

Our Services

Integrated Management Systems Environmental Management Systems Monitoring and updating legislation Audits EcoProfit Process Management Environmental site assessment Health and Safety Management Risk Management Quality Management Systems Environmental Balance

Waste Cost Management Computerized Model of Waste Management Modelling waste streams Cost-Benefit Analysis Resource efficiency and cleaner production

Development of Climate Strategies Greenhouse Gases Emission Inventories Mobility Management JI / CDM Projects Energy Management

Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) Ecodesign Carbon Footprint Water Footprint

Sustainability Reports/ CSR Sustainability Management Impact Analysis of the products or services Strategies and Action Plans

Training Programs Coaching Mediation Engaging stakeholders

Agenda

Important elements in SEAP development

Important elements in SEAP implementation

Successful measures

Lessons learned, impact and results



Measures of success



Kemp, Stark and Tantrum, 2004

Preliminary Phase (1), SEAP team

establishment

Initial review (2) BEI

Objective & targets setting

(3) SMART

Political engagement

(4) SEAP local approval

SEAP reported to COMO

SEAP approved by

JRC

Benefits

Quick and efficient start-up

Relevant inventory

with accurate

dates

Clear vision with

pragmatic and

adequate objective and

targets

SEAP approved at local level, subsequent allocation of

adequate budget

Acceptance criteria of SEAP by JRC

1. SEAP must be approved by an official body (in principle, the City Council).

2. SEAP must clearly specify which is the goal / target of reducing CO2 emissions

by 2020 (20% as a minimum).

3. Baseline Emission Inventory results (BEI) must be complete and cover the key

sectors of activity.

4. SEAP should include a set of actions in key sectors of activity (described

SMART)

5. SEAP template must be properly completed on the COMO site (IT application)

6. Data included in the SEAP template must be consistent and complete (budgets,

responsible, deadlines, reductions of CO2 emission/action).



Successful measures

Learned lessons, impact and results


Implementation and monitoring (5)

Measures

Evaluation and reporting (6)

Internal & External progress reporting

COMO external evaluation

Feedback report on IM Reports

Esential in the IMPLEMENTATION and MONITORING PHASE

SEAP is a STRATEGIC DOCUMENT

Measures included and accepted are either small or large projects programs (an accumulation of several projects)

Good Project Management

Team work

Team motivation

Continuous monitoring of consumption

Continuous monitoring of measures implementation, pragmatically and consistent

Continue incentives of various parts

Exchange of experiences with other communities or municipalities



Successful measures


Successful measures

Successful development measures

ADMINISTRATIVE

Local / regional / national - organizational structure

Assign resources / Project Manager / Motivated personal

Clear internal procedures in terms of operational

Internal and external communication

Responsibility / Authority

TEHNICAL

Team training on the methodology and the steps - ESSENTIAL

Available Work Tools

Specialists

Internal experts (manager or energy responsible) and external

Cooperation with JRC experts and support organizations

Cooperation with other signatories

Efficient use of the CoMO portal/site

Examples of good practice in the DEVELOPMENT

SEAP team composition

In SEAP team is also included Mayor / Deputy Mayor who is active in meetings

The multidisciplinary team with multiple competencies and external consultant

The team also includes representatives from other external organizations of the City Hall

Stakeholder involvement in work sessions - Acceptance / Cooperation

Inventory of consumption

Efficiently communication between government departments

Efficiently communication with other external institutions (EON, Enel, waste companies, transport companies, etc.)

Crosscheck data (collected from several sources, ex. Checking EPA's)

The existence of a comprehensive database on institutional and residential buildings sector

The existence of an electronic database (EMS - Energy Management System fully for all locally base buildings)

Examples of good practice in the DEVELOPMENT

Objectives / targets / measures setting

Pro-activity as heads of department in City Halls but also as citizens

Proposal of practical measures, some innovative one

Collection of measures in the form of questionnaires of citizens

Stakeholder involvement in work sessions - Acceptance / Cooperation (Chamber of Commerce, Industry companies, universities / schools, local agencies, etc.)

Involvement of NGOs

Involving politicians - acceptance - launch ideas that will be supported and implemented later / budget etc.

Successful measures

Successful implementation measures

ADMINISTRATIVE

Successful implementation measures

EnMS implemented according to ISO 50001

Provides opportunity institutionalization of SEAPs

Provides a traceability and data monitoring

Correct and complete SEAP Management / Shares

Continuous improvement / Update / Review

Provides control and monitoring of consumption data

Immediate identification of improvement options

Internal and external communication

Internal monitoring session, traceability programs and projects proposed

Allocation of resources (human and financial) timely

Accountability

TECHNICAL

Work tools, monitoring, tracking, reporting

Collaboration with ESCOs

Cabability to attract funds (EU 2014-2020) for future projects / programs



Successful measures


Lessons Learned - extracted from feedback

Stakeholder involvement (Zalau City Hall, Bacau City Hall, Arad City Hall, Timisoara City Hall)

Stakeholder involvement is essential in achieving a realistic SEAP, the more so as some information are not owned by the local authority

Differences between types of data centralization, ex. EON, Enel, other local companies, according to different orders

Correct communication with service providers on data requirements

Standardized and accessible databases(Zalau City Hall, Brasov City Hall)

The absence creates problems in identifying options

Availability and quality of data on energy consumption within the territorial administrative unit is essential (for a period of 5-7 years)

Clear allocation of responsibility to the local authors

Personnel must be informed, responsibilities must be assumed long-term

Changing team during development or implementation creates problems

Start with a defined and accountable team from the beginning and continue with it

Problems identified

Lack of knowledge / information relevant

Lack of interest

Lack of control


The itself analysis of environmental quality

Knowing the situation of local pollution and other problems is essential

Involving citizens and other interested parties, may shed light on referrals

Lack of energy audits

Their existence could shed light on the issues at the institutional level

Clear database regarding buildings would help more

Statistical directions have some data at the county level, not at the local level

Lack of statistical data (often available at the INS Bucharest, but not always)

INS or traffic police data are NOT centralizes according to the requirements of SEAP

Missing data in the Halls (number of house that are heated by wood by ex., Or number of central heating) and many others

The 2011 census collected a range of data relevant to SEAP – ARE NOT centralized locally - or no processed


Local lack of vision on energy efficiency

Initial analysis - BEI can channel THE VISION

THE VISION is drawn by the organization management

IS ASSUMED and fall into MISSION

LACK of personnel involved in energy efficiency as defined by Law 121/2014.

COMMUNICATION / AWARENESS

INTERNAL

EXTERNAL - to all stakeholders

It takes a sustained effort to inform, permanent monitoring of results and awareness among beneficiaries of the fact that it is an ongoing process in the long term

Actions already implemented or in progress - from SEAPs

Action TOTAL

investmentEuro

Energy saved,

MWh/year

CO2 reduction tCO2/an

Energy efficient trams and modernisation of tram depot 9.3 mil 33511 8482 Bicycle lanes along the river

Mureș 1.5 mil. 4189 1060 Bicycle lanes in Arad , 122.5

km 6 mil. 419 106 Energy efficiency in public

buildings(7 chools / kindergartens) ESCO - pilot

Rehabilitation of apartment buildings 6 mil. 13403 5910

Rehabilitation of thermal energy transport and

upgrading a substation of CET 5 mil 38991 38405

Extending the lighting system in Arad by

implementing photovoltaic panels systems for partial

providing of energy 2.2mil 1000 532.5

Arad SEAP - 159,704 inhabitants

Project: Energy efficiency work at 54 buildings of pre-university schools in the city of Brasov. Funded by: Local budget, structural funds and other sources Duration: 2008 – 2012 Value: 49 mil. Lei Partners: Municipality of Brasov, business, ABMEE (monitoring results) Results: The effect of implementing these energy efficiency measures has led, on average to increase by class energy performance of municipal buildings under the administration of the City Council of the City of Brasov. Thus, from an annual average specific energy consumption (heating and lighting in absolute value) of 248.18 kWh / sqm year 2008 (Energy class C) reached 201.33 kWh / sqm year 2012 (energy class B).

Brasov SEAP (227.961 inhabitants)


Project: REHABILITATION OF PUBLIC SPACES IN THE HISTORICAL CENTER OF TIMISOARA • Amenajarea pistelor pentru biciclete şi a zonelor pietonale; • Road Infrastructure Rehabilitation and reorganization of the historic center • Green spaces rehabilitation, upgrading and expansion • Technical- municipal infrastructure Rehabilitation the, including lighting • Making a car access controlled system composed of 14 technical systems and two centralized monitoring points Founded by: Local budget, EU and State Funds Duration: 2013 – 2015 Value: 53 mil. Lei

Reductions of consumer: 900 MWh / year Reduction of CO2 emissions: 233 tonnes CO2 / year

Timisoara SEAP ( 317651 inhabitants)


Project:

MODERNIZATION OF PUBLIC INTERMODAL TRANSPORT STATIONS IN TIMISOARA GROWTH POLE • 25 bike rental stations, self-service and the development of a coherent network of paths and trails for cyclists • 11 transport station. • Campaigns to promote the bicycle as a means of transport

Founded by: Local budget, structural founds Duration: 2013 – 2014 Value: 7.4 mil. Lei Reductions of consumer: cca. 400 MWh/year Reduction of CO2 emissions: 107 tonnes CO2/year

Timisoara SEAP


Project: REABILITATION OF REZIDEN|TIAL BUILDINGS • Thermal insulation of walls • roof insulation • Change windows / Termopane Etc. Financed: Local Budget, privat budget Period: 2010 – 2013 – continue In 2014 54 flat buildings will be rehabilitated, aproximative 2.500 of apartaments

PAED Timisoara


Project: 2 Bike rental points for access to the city central areas Financed: Privat Budget - Raiffeisen Bank Period: 2012 Project :

10 bicycles for Timisoara City Hall 10 Bicycles equipped with cyclocomputers, protection helmets Financed: Loalc Budget, Period: 2014 Value: 10575. Lei

PAED Timisoara


Project:

Modernization PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN THE INTERMODAL Timisoara Growth Pole

• 25 bike rental stations, self-service and the development of a coherent network of paths and trails for cyclists • 11 stations transport. • Campaigns to promote cycling as a means of transport Financed: Local budget, structural funds Period: 2013 – 2014 Value: 7.4 mil. Lei Energy reduction: cca. 400 MWh/an CO2 emission reduction: 107 tone CO2/an

PAED Timisoara


Proiect:

MOBILITY WEEK 2014 • Stakeholder engagement and bike city tour

(The ViceMayor was prezent) Financed: Local Budget Period: 2014 Other Projects : • Around 50 km of Bike lines were constructed in the last 3 years

• Extension of Electrical Bus lines in the periurban city Dumbravita

PAED Timisoara


Energy Management System in the municipal buildings in Timisoara?

To help the City Hall to save energy and to support SEAP implementation !

- EMS was the consequence of understanding the importance of measures for energy efficiency, especially the need to monitor the potential of energy savings allowed by the rational use of energy and the long-term benefits of investing in energy efficient buildings;

- Energy Management System is an on-line developed tool, where each municipal public building is registered, and it stores information regarding the total volume of energy consumption, the data from the utility bills, meter reading, number of users, etc.

- important instrument that enables the municipality to monitor energy consumption in publicly owned buildings, to make consumption and budget forecasts, to prioritise the investments towards the buildings in poor condition, to save money through energy efficiency, and raise citizens’ awareness of the concept of rational energy use;

Activities implemented in the frame of CONURBANT Projectin Timisoara

Energy responsible in each municipal building – with well defined duties;

Training and support - the Energy Responsibles introduces the data into the online system;

Report will be prepared, including measures and recommendations for the improvement of water and energy consumption in the analysed buildings.

Re-ebvaluated SEAP for Timsoara include as a measure the development of an Energy Management System based on ISO 50001:2011

Project:

PURCHASE A NUMBER OF 2 BUSES WITCH FOLLOW ENVIRONMENTAL NORMS EURO 6 • Increasing the number of passengers • Excellent conditions for passengers transport / Satisfaction • New program

Found by: Local budget Duration: 2013 – 2014 Value: 350.000 Euro Reductions of consumer: cca. 9.5 MWh/year Reduction of CO2 emissions: 2.5 tonnes CO2/years

GIROC SEAP – 8500 inhabitants (not all registered)


Mu

nic

ipal b

uild

ing

s

Replacing street lights with one more efficient. Report Milton

Keynes ()

Eliminating excessive street lighting, impractical (uncirculated areas,

bordering etc ). Report Tallin

()

Turning off public lighting in areas and timeframes with minimal

movement (eg, between the hours 3-5). Report Tallin

()

Use efficient bulbs. (Compact Fluorescent Light bulbs) most reports

Efficiency and rational use of air conditioning systems. (report shows

power savings of up to 30%) Report Haga

Energy certification of buildings and imposing administrative level C as

the minimum energy efficiency Report Haga

Include energy efficiency as a criterion for acquisition of equipment. Report Haga

Disconnecting electronic equipment with stand-by during the weekend. Report

Organizing courses on efficient driving (eco) for employees of the and

transport. Report ()

Implementation of environmental management systems in institutions. Report ()

Good practice examples


En

erg

y

Region geothermal potential exploration Raport Haga

Refurbishment and renewal of therma agent networks

Electrical distribution netwoks optimization Raport Tallin (Estonia)

Energy recovery from waste incineration (electrical or even thermal energy)

Raport Tallin (Estonia)

Cogeneration of thermal and electrical energy Most of raports

Biogas regional plant, biogas obtained from organic fermentation. Raport Haga

Biogas production from sewage sludge fermentation (sludge coming from wastewater treatment plants)

Raport Tallin (Estonia)

Workshops organizations with companies employees to promote eco-efficiency . Awarding session for companies which prove a good environmental performance and support in the EMS implementation .

Raport Heidelberg (Germania)

Resid

en

tial

Thermal insulation of buildings. majoritatea rapoartelor

Imposing standards of energy efficient building. Raport Heidelberg (Germania)

Promoting compactly development in the city. Raport Tallin (Estonia)

Promotion power plants with Biomass. Raport North Tyneside

Promoting underground heat pumps, geothermal. Raport North Tyneside

Setting splitters for radiators. Raport Tallin (Estonia)

Campaigns and contests to promote eco-efficiency in schools /

kindergartens. Raport Heidelberg (Germania)

Capture and use rainwater. Raport Tallin (Estonia)

Promoting the use of efficient bulbs. (Compact Fluorescent Lightbulbs) Raport Kolasin (Montenegro)

Public awareness on energy performance labels and promoting the

purchase of energy efficient equipment Raport Kolasin (Montenegro)

It predicts a 10% reduction in natural gas consumption as a result of

replacing apartment plants at the end of life with other with better

performance. (increase in efficiency from 65-70% to 85 +%) Raport Kolasin (Montenegro)

It is expected a reduction of 10% residential due to regulations on energy efficiency and technological advancement.

Raport North Tyneside


Tran

sp

ort

Ease traffic in congested intersections (stationary time reduction leads to

reduction) Raport Tallin (Estonia)

Promoting eco-driving (distributing pamphlets, etc ...) Raport Heidelberg (Germania)

Denial of access to areas and central streets, historical, except means of

transport. Nijmegen (Olanda)

Is expected to reduce emissions by 10% as a result of regulations introduced

and advancing automotive technology. Raport Haga

Creation cycling tracks. Raport Cardiff

Introducing a bicycle rental system that includes a free trial period. Raport Cardiff

Connecting residential areas with rapid development in network transport. Raport Tallin (Estonia)

Reinstatement of disused tram lines Raport Tallin (Estonia)

The expected emission reductions as a result of regulations that stipulate a

10% biofuel content in fuels supplied. Raport Haga

Wate

r

Modernizarea retelei de distributie a apei.

Utilizarea biogazului obtinut in procesul de epurare biologica a apei. Raport Tallin (Estonia)

Inlocuirea pompelor de distributie a apei cu modele mai eficiente. Raport Tallin (Estonia)


Sustainable Development

„Nothing is more powerful than an idea whose time has come“

Victor Hugo

THANK YOU

FISTIS GABRIELA

Director Executiv - Denkstatt Romania

Mobil: 0735 172 088

Email: [email protected]

9. paed romania denkstatt

Business

Transcript of 9. paed romania denkstatt