8TH ANNUAL 8 ANNUAL YARD CONTAINER SHIP-TO ......Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries|...

01Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Content

Port Equipment Manufacturers Association

www.pema.org

8TH ANNUAL SHIP-TO-SHORE CRANE SURVEY

GLOBAL DELIVERIES 2018

This survey covers 2018 global and regional delivery volumes and 2005-18

global and regional delivery trends for ship-to-shore container cranes.

Researched and authored exclusively for PEMA by Brian Robinson.

Published May 2019

Port Equipment Manufacturers Association

www.pema.org

8TH ANNUAL SHIP-TO-SHORE CRANE SURVEY

GLOBAL DELIVERIES 2018


global and regional delivery trends for ship-to-shore container cranes.


Published May 2019

8th ANNUALYARD CONTAINER

CRANE SURVEYGLOBAL DELIVERIES 2019


global and regional delivery trends for Yard Container Crane.


Published August 2020

0302 Content | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Content

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 04

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY FINDINGS 06

2. YARD CRANE DELIVERIES IN 2019 07

3. GLOBAL DELIVERY TRENDS 2005-2019 22

4. ABOUT THE AUTHOR 28

1.1 Global yard crane deliveries 2019 by geographic region 07

1.2 Global RTG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 08

1.2.1 Global eRTG deliveries 2012 -2019 by geographic region 08

1.3 Global RMG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 10

1.3.1 Global ASC deliveries 2013 – 2019 by geographic region 10

2. Consolidated results of 2019 yard crane deliveries 12

3.1 Global yard crane delivery trend 2005-2019 22

3.2 lobal yard crane delivery trend 2005-2019 by region 22

3.3 Global RTG delivery trend 2007-2019 24

3.4 Global RTG delivery trend 2007-2019 by region 24

3.5 Global RMG delivery trend 2007-2019 26

3.6 Global RMG delivery trend 2007-2019 by region 26







3.1 Global yard crane delivery trend 2005-2019 22

3.2 Global yard crane delivery trend 2005-2019 by region 23

3.3 Global RTG delivery trend 2007-2019 24

3.4 Global RTG delivery trend 2007-2019 by region 25

3.5 Global RMG delivery trend 2007-2019 26

3.6 Global RMG delivery trend 2007-2019 by region 27

Tables

Figures

www.pema.org

0504 Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| IntroductionIntroduction| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries

INTRODUCTION

Based on original data gathered from port

equipment manufacturers around the world, the

objective of the annual survey is to determine

market size and scope by equipment delivery

volumes for yard container gantry cranes, including:

• Rubber-tyred gantry cranes (RTGs)

• Electrified rubber-tyred gantry cranes (e-RTGs)

• Rail-mounted gantry cranes (RMGs)

• Automated stacking cranes (ASCs)

Prior to 2011 this information had been published

in the trade press, but as a result of changes in

magazine publication this is no longer the case.

Information continues to be published in the

trade press for yard container cranes on order at a

specific date in time for delivery in future months.

However, there are no data readily available

for precise delivery numbers during a given

calendar year.

Following cessation of the earlier mentioned

trade press report, crane manufacturers were

asked whether a survey of past annual delivery

numbers was useful information for them and

there was a resoundingly positive response.

PEMA is committed to promoting and supporting

the global role of port equipment and technology

and in order to fill the gap in industry information

commissioned the survey of 2011 through 2018

deliveries and does so again this year.

For similar reasons, PEMA has also commissioned

a report on annual deliveries of ship-to-shore

container cranes. These two surveys for 2019

together complement the well-established PEMA

Annual Global Survey on Mobile Port Equipment

Deliveries, covering reach stackers, lift trucks and

terminal tractors.

METHODOLOGYThe survey research was conducted in February

until March 2020 and the results were collated in

March 2020

All known manufacturers of yard cranes were

contacted and asked to complete a questionnaire

giving details of their deliveries in 2019. They

were requested to separately identify RTGs,

e-RTGs, RMGs and ASCs. Some manufacturers

may not have separately identified RMGs and

ASCs and RTGs and eRTGs. The numbers shown in

this report reflect those reported by contributors.

Because PEMA is a trade association, some

specific rules apply with respect to reporting

data on individual company activity. This report

follows much the same format as in past years

and as was previously published in the trade

press, but without details on the supplying

manufacturer and the name of component

suppliers.

The survey was conducted by Brian Robinson, an

independent container and transport consultant.

Mr. Robinson has been the author of the surveys

published in the trade press for the past several

years and he is able to use historical data to

provide valuable trend information.

CONFIDENTIALITYMr. Robinson signed a confidentiality agreement

with PEMA stating that individual company data

would not be released by him to any other party,

including any officer or member of PEMA, except

in fully consolidated and aggregated form.

Furthermore, the release of any and all data

must comply with criteria established by outside

counsel and all source data will be destroyed within

six months of the survey results being released.

SURVEY DISTRIBUTIONThe consolidated survey results will be released

to PEMA members and to all contributors to the

survey immediately upon publication. At a later

date the report will be made available in the

public domain.

DISCLAIMERThis survey is based on information provided

directly by the equipment manufacturers. Data

have not been independently verified. PEMA and

the author cannot accept responsibility for the

accuracy of the data provided. This document

does not constitute professional advice, nor is it an

exhaustive summary of the information available

on the subject matter to which it refers.

Every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the

information, but neither the author, PEMA nor

any member company is responsible for any loss,

damage, costs or expenses incurred, whether

or not in negligence, arising from reliance on or

interpretation of the data.

www.pema.org

0706 Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019Executive Summary | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In 2019 there were 670 Yard Crane deliveries

compared with 636 in 2018. There were 526 RTG

deliveries and 144 RMGs compared with 393

RTG and 243 RMG in 2018.

The 34% increase in RTG deliveries compared

with 2018 occurred with increases in every

geographic region with the exception of China

and Australia Pacific.

Conversly RMG deliveries were down 40% from

243 in 2018 to 144 in 2019. The biggest decline

occuring in Other Asia (which for the purposes

of this report is Asia with the exception of China)

where 5 RMGs were delivered in 2019 compared

with 79 in 2018

Note: ASCs are included in RMGs in the numbers

above.

Manufacturers were asked to specifically iden-

tify Automatic Stacking Cranes (ASCs). There

were a total 68 ASCs reported deliveries in 2019

compared with 124 in 2018. Deliveries were

to Europe, North America, Mid East and Africa

(Morocco).

Manufacturers were again also asked to identify

eRTGs. It may be that some did not, but of the

526 RTGs reported 53 cranes were identified as

eRTGs,

Important note:- It is possible that the number

of ASCs and eRTGs is understated because some

manufacturers did not identify ASCs in their RMG

numbers or eRTGs in the RTG totals.

2. YARD CRANE

Twelve (12) manufacturers were contacted and

asked for details of their 2019 deliveries. All of

these have supplied cranes over recent years.

The 12 manufacturers contacted were:

• Baltkran

• Hyundai Samho

• Kalmar

• Kocks Krane

• Konecranes

• Kuenz

• Liebherr

• Sumitomo Heavy Industry / Mitsubishi Heavy

Industry

• Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding

• Sany Marine Heavy Industry

• Mitsubishi Loginext (Merging of Unicarriers

and Nichiyu Mitsubishi)

• ZPMC

Note: - Paceco Espana withdrew from port

crane manufacturing in 2018.

- Terex merged with Konecranes in 2017

TABLE 1.1 GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

China 111 17%

Other Asia 165 25%

Europe 95 14%

Nth America 108 16%

Latin America 21 3%

Mid. East 63 9%

Africa 104 16%

Australasia 3 0%

Total 670 100%

FIGURE 1.1 GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

China

Latin America

Europe

Africa

Other Asia

Mid East

Nth America

Australia/Pacific

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY FINDINGS YARD CRANE DELIVERIES IN 2019

16563

21 3

108

104

95

111

www.pema.org

0908 Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries

FIGURE 1.2: GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

TABLE 1.2 GLOBAL RTG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

FIGURE 1.3: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

China 83 16%

Other Asia 160 30%

Europe 72 14%

Nth America 82 16%

Latin America 21 4%

Mid. East 31 6%

Africa 74 14%

Australasia 3 0%

Total 526 100%

TABLE 1.2.1 GLOBAL eRTG DELIVERIES 2012 -2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

Region 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

China 41 10 2 8 4 4 6 0

Other Asia 18 22 34 48 42 34 22 12

Europe 7 27 61 63 31 32 24 19

Nth America 12 14 3 16

Latin America 30 0 24 9 30 6 2 0

Mid East 2 0 4 1 0 2 1

Africa 4 10 5

Global 98 59 125 145 131 76 59 53

Note : the eRTG delivery numbers shown in table 1.2.1 are included the RTG delivery numbers shown in Table 1.2Some manufacturers did not specifically identify eRTGs it is therefore probable that the above eRTG numbers are understated

China

Latin America

Europe

Africa

Other Asia

Mid East

Nth America

Australia/Pacific

FIGURE 1.4: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

16031

21 3

82

74

72

83

www.pema.org

1110 Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries

TABLE 1.3: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

TABLE 1.3.1: GLOBAL ASC DELIVERIES 2013-2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

Region 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

China 28 30 0

Other Asia 10 72 18 0

Europe 84 63 30 30 15 14 6

Nth. America 10 30 17 2 2 38 22

Mid. East 12 8 0 10 35 24 16

Africa 24

Australasia 12 20 6 22 0

Global 118 121 63 64 152 124 68

China 28 19%

Other Asia 5 3%

Europe 23 16%

Nth America 26 18%

Latin America 0 0%

Mid. East 32 22%

Africa 30 21%

Australasia 0 0%

Total 144 100%

FIGURE 1.5: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION, INCLUDING ASCS

Note : The ASC delivery numbers shown in table 1.3.1 are included in the total RMG number in Table 1.3

China

Europe

Africa

Other Asia

Mid EastNth America

FIGURE 1.6: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION, INCLUDING ASCS

3223

5

28

26

30

www.pema.org

1312 Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries

YARD CRANE DELIVERIES IN 2019

TABLE 2 CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF 2019 YARD CRANE DELIVERIES

RTG/eRTG/RMG/ASC cranes delivered in 2019

Country Quantity RTG/eRTG RMG/ASC

Number ofwheels (if RTG)

LiftCapacity

Lift Heightm

Spanm

Speeds (m/min) Spreader

Delivered is defined as ex-factory to Trolley Hoist Gantry Single/twin

DPW Djazair Algeria 5 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 7+1 70 26/52 135 Single

Exolgán S.A. Container Term. Buenos Aires Argentina 4 RTG 8 40 1o5 6+1 Single

Pacific National, Cairns Term. Australia 2 RTG 8 41 1o3 4+1 Single

Pacific National, Mackay Term. Australia 1 RTG 8 41 1o3 4+1 Single

Container Terminal Enns Austria/Enns 1 RMG 41 t 20 m 42,70 m 100 m/min 36 m/min 120 m/min Single

Chittagong Port Authority Bangladesh 6 RTG 40T 20.75 23.5 70 20/46 130

BEST Barcelona 6 ASC 40.6 18.1 29.1 60 45/90 270 Single

Brest Belarus 1 RTG 16 36t 5+1 26.5 70 23/46 30/135 Single

BTP Brazil 4 RTG 41T 21 25.93 70 22/50 135

GTC Vanterm Canada 4 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 7+1 76 31/62 135 Single

GTC Deltaport Canada 6 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 7+1 76 31/62 135 Single

Termont Canada 3 RTG 16 60 1-over-6 6+1 70 26/52 135 Single

Montreal Gateway Terminal Partnership Canada 10 ERTG 16 40.6 18.1 23.1 70 28/57 135 Single

Yidu Port Co.,Ltd. China 3 RMG 35/45 15.3 35 20/40 63 Single

Ganzhou Port China 1 RMG 40.5 12.5 35 15/30 50/70 Single

Hefei Paihe China 8 RMG 40.5 15.3 40 30/50 80 Single

Hefei Port Co.,Ltd. China 2 RMG 24 40.5 15.8 40/30 15 76 Single

Jinzhou Port, China China 1 RMG 35 15.7 50 22/35 70 Single

Jintang Port Co.,Ltd. China 2 RMG 40.5 12.5 40 40/80 120 Single

Wuhan Northern Rail Way Station China 1 RTG 40.5 12.5 35 20/40 100/120 Single

Gansu Guotong Logist Co., Ltd China 1 RTG 24 40.5 12.5 32 20/40 80/110 Single

Qingzhou Port Co., Ltd. China 4 RTG 41 18.1 23.47 25/52 70 Single

Zhuhai International Container Terminal China 12 RTG 16 40 18.1 23.47 20/45 70 Single

Fujian Jiangyin China 5 RTG 65LT 70 30.48 52 90/180 240

Shanghai Port YiDong Term China 3 RTG 40T 18.2 23.47 70 27/54 135

Ningbo Daxie Container Terminal Co., Ltd. China China 6 RTG 40.6T 18.24 23.47 70 23/52 90

Yingkou Port China 6 RTG 40.5T 23.47 70 23/52 90

Ningbo Zhoushan China 24 RTG 40.6T 18.24 23.47 70 23/52 130

www.pema.org

1514


Zhanjiang Port China 3 RTG 41T 18.24 23.47 70 25/54 90

Tianjin Port China 5 RTG 61T 15.24 23.47 70 18/52 90

Dongguan Humen Interenational Termianl China 3 RTG 40.5T 18 23.47 70 25/50 130

Ningbo Beilun China 9 RTG 40.6T 18.2 23.47 70 23/55 130

Guangzhou Contanier Terminal China 1 RTG 41T 18.1 23.47 70 25/55 100

Sout+A107:K115 Miami China 8 RMG 65T 33 120 40/80 150

Port of Guangzhou (Nansha)., China China 3 RMG 7T 21.1 31 91 40/60 47

Metrans A.S. Czech Republic/Prague 1 RMG 37 t 12,6 m 35,80 m 100 m/min 20 m/min 100 m/min Single

SGTD Djibouti 2 RTG 41T 18.27 23.47 70 25/50 135

SGTD Djibouti 8 RTG 41T 18.27 23.47 70 25/50 135

SGTD Djibouti 2 RMG 41T 10.1 20.8 120 30/60 90

DPW Posorja Ecuador 3 RTG 41T 18.2 26.4 70 25/50 135

Sokhna Egypt 8 RTG 16 41 18.2 23.47 70 28/56 135 Single

DCHC Egypt 6 RTG 40T 18 26.5 70 20/46 130

PSCCHC Egypt 6 RTG 40T 18 26.5 70 27.5/55 120

DCHC Egypt 3 RTG 40T 18 26.5 70 26/52 120

Sokhna,DPW Egypt 2 RMG 41T 31.2 120 35/70 120

Compagnie Nationale du Rhône France/lyon 1 RMG 41 t 22,50 m 28 m 120 m/min 60 m/min 90 m/min Single

Tema,Ghana Ghana 20 RTG 41T 18.1 25.93 70 22/50 135

Terminal de Contenedores Quetzal Guatemala 2 RTG 16 41 18.1 26.45 70 28/56 130 Single

Metrans Koenener Raktarozo Es Atrakodo KFT

Hungary Budapest 1 RMG 37 t 12,60 m 40 m 100 m/min 40 m/min 100 m/min Single

Adani Mundra CT4 India 5 RTG 41T 18.2 26.5 70 25/50 135

Adani Hazira India 2 RTG 41T 18.2 26.5 70 25/50 135

Adani Mundra T2 India 3 RMG 65T 10.2 34 150 35/75 150

PT Graha Segara Indonesia 1 RTG 8 41 1o6 6+1 Single

RAPP, Futong Port Indonesia 1 RTG 8 41 1o5 6+1 Single

Belawan Container Terminal Phase 2 Indonesia 12 ARTG/eRTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single

Belawan Container Terminal Indonesia 5 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 30/60 130 Single

PT. Pelayaran Tempuran Emas Tbk. Indonesia 6 RTG 8 40.6 21 23.47 70 23 90 Single

New Priok Container Terminal Indonesia 4 RTG 41t 21.2 23.47 70 30/60 120

DSG, Dublin Ireland 1 RTG 16 40.6 21 25.95 70 28/56 130 Single

Conterm Ashdod Israel 1 eRTG 16 40 1-over-6 7+1 70 26/52 130 Single

Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries

www.pema.org

1716

Fridenson Logistigs Services Israel 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 7+1 70 26/52 130 Single

VTE (Voltri Terminal Europa S.p.A.) Italy/Genova 2 RMG 45 t 10,50 m 27 m 120 m/min 40 m/min 120 m/min Single

Kamagumi Yokohama Japan 2 RTG 8 40.6 18.1 23.47 70 23/54 135 Single

Tomakomai Port Japan 1 RTG 8 40.6 18.1 23.47 70 23/54 135 Single

Toyo Futo (Kawasaki) Japan 1 RTG 8 40.6 18.1 23.47 70 23/54 135 Single

Daito Corporation Japan 1 RTG 8 40.6 18.3 23.47 70 23 90 Single


APM Terminals Japan. Co., Ltd. Japan 8 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single

Shosen Koun Co., Ltd. Japan 2 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single


MITSUI-SOKO CO.Ltd. Japan 7 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single

NIPPON-EXPRESS CO.Ltd. Japan 4 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single

Utoc Corporation Japan 2 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.2 70 23 90 Single

Karaganda Kazakhstan 1 RMG 50t 3+1 32 36 8 33 Single

CRBC Kenya 2 RMG 40T 30 80 20/40 100

Klaipeda Container Terminal Lithuania 4 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 26/52 135 Single

Klaipedos Smelte Lithuania 10 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single

Klaipeda Container Terminal Lithuania 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 26/52 135 Single

Madagascar Interntl. Cont. Term Madagascar 3 RTG 41T 18.2 23.47 70 25/50 130

Bintulu Port Malaysia 2 RTG 8 40 1-over-6 6+1 72 23/52 130 Single

Penang Port Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia 3 RTG 8 40 21 23.47 70 23 90 Single

Johor Port Berhad Malaysia 2 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single

Penang Port Malaysia 2 RMG 40T 40 100 35/70 60

Malta Freeport Terminal Malta 15 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 130 Single

CMSA,ICTSI Mexico 5 RTG 41T 20.65 23.47 70 25/50 90

ATP Mexico 3 RTG 41T 18.3 23.47 70 30/60 135

Eurogate Tanger S.A. Morocco 2 RTG 8 50 1o5 6+1 Single

APM Terminals MedPort Tangier Morocco/Taniger 24 ASC 41 t 17,90 m 33,70 m 72 m/min 84 m/min 210 m/min Single

Ministry of Transport and Comu-nications Mozambique 6 RTG 8 41 18 23.5 70 23 90 Single

RST Netherlands 2 RMG 41t 15 54 180 80 120 Single

CTVrede Steinweg BV Netherlands/Zaandam 1 RMG 41 t 18 m 48 m 100 m/min 60 m/min 100 m/min Single

OICT, HPH Oman 8 RTG 41T 20.75 23.47 70 30/60 135

SAPT, Pakistan,HPH Pakistan 5 RTG 41T 20.75 23.47 70 24/55 90



www.pema.org

1918

SAPT, HPH Pakistan 11 RTG 41T 20.75 23.47 70 30/60 135

Internatinal Container Terminal Services Inc. Philippines 16 RTG 8 40.6 18.2 23.47 70 23 90 Single

DCT Poland 3 RMG 41t 9.55 32 120 56 150 Single

Sibur Russia 1 RMG 42t 2+1 35 48 12 37 Single

Kharovsk Russia 1 RMG 32t 2+1 32 20 8 30 Single

Kaliningrad Russia 1 RMG 45t 3+1 25 40 24 60 Single

Nizhnekamsk Russia 1 RMG 45t 3+1 25 40 24 60 Single

King Abdullah Port Saudi Arabia 20 RTG 16 40.6 21 26.45 70 28/56 130 Single

Koper Slovenia 5 eRTG 16 40 1-over-5 7+1 70 31/62 135 Single

SAGT Sri Lanka 6 RTG 41T 20.75 22.7 70 22/50 135

CICT Sri Lanka 6 RTG 41T 21.2 23.47 70 23/52 90

Hutchison Laemchabang Terminal Limited Thailand 10 RTG 41T 20.75 23.47 70 30/60 134

Lomé Container Terminal Togo 5 eRTG 16 40 1-over-6 7+1 70 30/60 135 Single

Yilport Holding Inc. Turkey 4 RTG 8 41 21 26.5 70 26 90 Single

Kumport Turkey 8 RTG 40T 21.22 26.18 70 26/52 130

Khalifa Port Abu Dhabi U.A.E. 12 RMG 41T 18.1 34 90 45/90 240

Khalifa Port Abu Dhabi U.A.E. 4 RMG 9T 4.5 34 90 45/90 120

Abu Dhabi Terminals U.A.E. 16 ASC 40.6 21 29 60 45/90 240 Single

Felixstowe Dock and Railway Company UK 8 RTG 41T 21.818 27.1 70 30/60 135

Belfast Container Terminal UK 8 Zero Emission AutoRTG 16 40 1o5 9+1 Single

ABP, Immingham UK 6 Zero Emission RTG 16 41 1o6 7+1 Single

Norfolk Southern, Landers Term. Chicago USA 2 RTG 8 31 1o4 6+1 Single

Norfolk Southern, Rossville Term. Memphis USA 2 RTG 8 31 1o4 6+1 Single

CSX Intermodal, Syracuse Term. New York USA 2 RTG 16 45 1o5 7+1 Single

South Florida Container Term. Miami USA 6 Zero Emission RTG 16 41 1o5 6+1 Single

Massport USA 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single

Georgia Ports Authority USA 10 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 6+1 82 31/61 137 Single

South Carolina Port Authority USA 2 RTG 16 50 1-over-5 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single

South Carolina Port Authority USA 24 RTG 16 50 1-over-5 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single

Kansas City Southem Rail (KCSM) USA 2 RTG 16 45 1-over-3 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single

Massport USA 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single



www.pema.org

2120

Georgia Ports Authority USA 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single

Global Container Terminal (GCT) Bayonne USA 2 RMG 50.8 12.2 47.5 150 40/80 120 Twin

Virginia International Terminals Inc (VIG) USA 2 RMG 40.6 12.2 25.3 150 45/90 180 Single

Norfolk International Terminal (NIT) USA 22 ASC 40.6 18.1 29 72 45/90 300 Single

CSX Intermodal Terminals USA 2 RTG 16 40.6 12.3 22.9 70 28/56 130 Single

CSX Intermodal Terminals USA 1 RTG 8 40.6 12 21.64 50 18/50 130 Single

Haiphong International Container Terminal Vietnam 24 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 26 90 Single

TCIT Vietnam 2 RTG 41T 23.47 70 23/54 130

670

Notes:

1 | ASC = Automated stacking crane RMG = rail mounted gantry crane RTG = rubber tyred gantry crane

eRTG = electrified rubber tyred gantry crane

2 | Some manufacturers express crane height and span in terms of number of containers rather than

as an absolute measurement.

There maybe a variance between suppliers, but the following conversion may be useful.

Lift height (m) Equivalent in one over x containers

12.3 1 over 3 (3+1)

15.3 1 over 4 (4+1)

18.1 1 over 5 (5+1)

21.0 1 over 6 (6+1)

Gantry span (m) Equivalent in rows + truck lane

20.8 5+1

23.6 6+1

26.5 7+1



www.pema.org

2322 Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries

FIGURE 3.1: GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERY TREND 2005-2019

TABLE 3.2 GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERY TREND 2005-2019 BY REGION

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

China 270 347 275 257 215 87 82 135 68 89 142 170 117 150 111

Other Asia 184 227 124 194 274 71 153 212 158 263 197 149 253 214 165

Europe 64 174 130 189 135 140 62 85 186 179 145 126 72 91 95

North Am. 91 96 93 38 16 43 7 35 68 44 48 67 36 75 108

Latin Am. 23 94 89 65 48 47 81 140 116 101 38 62 55 19 21

Mid East 67 76 53 68 91 49 44 51 53 42 73 34 72 45 63

Africa 12 19 27 66 77 91 22 32 67 52 25 74 21 38 104

Australasia 0 6 3 0 0 1 4 0 12 20 10 22 4 4 3

Global 711 1039 794 877 856 529 455 690 728 790 678 704 630 636 670

3. GLOBAL DELIVERY TRENDS 2005-2019

TABLE 3.1: GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERY TREND 2005-2019

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Quantity 711 1039 794 877 856 529 455 690 728 790 678 704 630 636 670

FIGURE 3.2: GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERY TREND 2005-2019 BY REGION

www.pema.org

2524

TABLE 3.3: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019

Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Quantity 670 714 671 422 337 610 530 507 490 503 416 393 526

FIGURE 3.3: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019

TABLE 3.4: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 BY REGION

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

China 242 225 151 59 65 126 65 71 133 111 55 108 83

Other Asia 122 152 211 67 111 203 153 173 127 146 174 135 160

Europe 89 128 104 82 35 37 75 80 94 67 48 57 72

North Am. 63 30 11 38 7 28 20 10 23 48 26 26 82

Latin Am. 89 65 48 47 81 140 116 91 38 52 51 19 21

Mid East 35 48 71 37 12 48 38 32 40 9 37 13 31

Africa 27 66 75 91 22 28 63 50 25 70 21 31 74

Australasia 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 10 0 4 4 3

Global 670 714 671 422 337 610 530 507 490 503 416 393 526

FIGURE 3.4: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 BY REGION

Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries

www.pema.org

2726

TABLE 3.5: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019

FIGURE 3.5: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019

Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Quantity 124 163 185 107 118 80 198 283 188 201 214 243 144

TABLE 3.6 GLOBAL RMG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 BY REGION

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

China 33 32 64 28 17 9 3 18 9 59 62 42 28

Other Asia 2 42 63 4 42 9 5 90 70 3 79 79 5

Europe 41 61 31 58 27 48 111 99 51 59 24 34 23

North Am. 30 8 5 5 0 7 48 34 25 19 10 49 26

Latin Am. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 4 0 0

Mid East 18 20 20 12 32 3 15 10 33 25 35 32 32

Africa 0 0 2 0 0 4 4 2 0 4 0 7 30

Australasia 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 20 0 22 0 0 0

Global 124 163 185 107 118 80 198 283 188 201 214 243 144

FIGURE 3.6: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 BY REGION

Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries

www.pema.org

2928 Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| ContactAbout the Author | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries

5. ABOUT THE AUTHOR

For the past 19 years, Brian Robinson has worked

as a freelance journalist and transport industry

consultant. His journalistic and consulting assign-

ments have covered all aspects of the transport,

shipping and the ports and terminals industry,

with special emphasis on terminal handling

equipment.

Mr. Robinson has conducted detailed annual

industry surveys of ship to shore (STS) and RTG/

RMG yard cranes, which have been published in

the trade press and become industry benchmarks.

Over recent years he has conducted similar

surveys on behalf of PEMA along with surveys of

annual delivery of mobile handling equipment.

For most of his career he was engaged in various

senior management positions in the container

leasing sector in Europe and USA, covering both

field and HQ positions. Earlier he worked in the

rail, road and shipping industries. Mr. Robinson

was educated at London School of Economics

and Anglian Management School.

PEMA – PORT EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION

Registered Office: p/a Glaverbel Building,

Chaussée de la Hulpe 166 Terhulpsesteenweg, B-1170 Brussels, Belgium

President & Finance Office: Paradiso-TI, CH-6900, Switzerland

Secretariat Office: Port Equipment Manufacturers Association (PEMA) 15-17 St. Cross St. London EC1N 8UW, United Kingdom

Secretariat Contacts:

Petar Karaivanov

Head of Administration

Mobile: +44 7766 228 958

Email: [email protected]

www.pema.org

PEMA – Port Equipment Manufacturers Association

Registered Office: p/a Glaverbel Building, Chaussée de la Hulpe 166 Terhulpsesteenweg, B-1170Brussels, BelgiumPresident & Finance Office: Paradiso-TI, CH-6900, SwitzerlandSecretariat Office: Port Equipment Manufacturers Association (PEMA) 15-17 St. Cross St. LondonEC1N 8UW, United Kingdom

Secretariat Contacts:Petar KaraivanovHead of AdministrationMobile: +44 7766 228 958 Email: [email protected]

www.pema.org | @PEMASecretary

ww

w.p

ema.

org

- A

pri

l 2

01

9pe

ma.

org

– A

ugus

t 202

0

8TH ANNUAL 8 ANNUAL YARD CONTAINER SHIP-TO ......Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries|...

Documents

Transcript of 8TH ANNUAL 8 ANNUAL YARD CONTAINER SHIP-TO ......Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries|...