6610gibbmodule3final

25
The Integration of Technology in Education: An Analytical Review of the Literature William Gibb

description

Integration of Technology in Education

Transcript of 6610gibbmodule3final

Page 1: 6610gibbmodule3final

The Integration of Technology in Education: An Analytical

Review of the Literature William Gibb

Page 2: 6610gibbmodule3final

“Integration of information and communication technologies (ICTs) enhances the quality of education by helping teachers to do their job and helping students learn more effectively”

1.Goktas, Yildirim, & Yildirim, p. 193, (2009).

Page 3: 6610gibbmodule3final

Overview

• Description of Studies

• Findings

Conclusions

Implications

Limitations

Page 4: 6610gibbmodule3final

Integration/Use/

Adoption

Not general using computers

Not adoption of teaching styles

Technology,

Information and Computer Technology (ICT)

Information technology (IT)

These must be related to integration

Education / Teaching Not general education and teaching

Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria

Page 5: 6610gibbmodule3final

Journals Used in the Analysis

• Total of 15 peer reviewed journals

• 4 Open access journals

• 11 Paid subscription journals

Page 6: 6610gibbmodule3final

Countries

2

7 1

1

1

1

1 1

Page 7: 6610gibbmodule3final

Participants and Context

• Professors/instructors, student teachers and administrators in Universities and Colleges; 6 studies1,3,214,4,6

• Teachers and administrators in elementary and/or secondary schools; 9 studies8,7,13,12,9,5,15,11,10

Page 8: 6610gibbmodule3final

Data Acquisition

• Questionnaires 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15

• Interviews 3,1,8,9,2,4,11,10

• Observation 8,9,6,11,10

• Document analysis 2,4,6

• Case study 9,4

Page 9: 6610gibbmodule3final

Data Analysis

• Questionnaires: Descriptive statistics, path analysis, equation modeling,

• Interviews; Content and Thematic analysis;

• Observation; Identified themes

• Document analysis; Textual analysis

• Case studies; Thematic descriptions

Page 10: 6610gibbmodule3final

Overview

• Description of Studies

• Findings

Conclusions

Implications

Limitations

Page 11: 6610gibbmodule3final

Findings

Page 12: 6610gibbmodule3final
Page 13: 6610gibbmodule3final
Page 14: 6610gibbmodule3final
Page 15: 6610gibbmodule3final
Page 16: 6610gibbmodule3final
Page 17: 6610gibbmodule3final
Page 18: 6610gibbmodule3final

Conclusions

Page 19: 6610gibbmodule3final

Implications 1

Page 20: 6610gibbmodule3final

Implications 2

Page 21: 6610gibbmodule3final

Limitations

Page 22: 6610gibbmodule3final

Strengths

Page 23: 6610gibbmodule3final

References

• 1. Brill, J. M. (2007). Perils and promises: University instructors’ integration of technology in classroom-based practices. British Journal of Educational Technology 38(1), 95-105. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00601.x.

• 2. Chitiyo, R. & Harmon, S.W. (2009). An analysis of the integration of instructional

technology in pre-service teacher education in Zimbabwe.• Educational Technology Research and Development 57(6), 807-830.

doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9136-7

• 3. Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S. & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main Barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Educational Technology & Society 12(1), 193-204. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/others/

• 4. Hsu, P-S. & Sharma, P. (2008). A case study of enabling factors in the technology integration change process. Education Technology and Society 11(4), 213-228. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/others/

• 5. Inan, F. A. & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development 58(2), 137-154. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y.

Page 24: 6610gibbmodule3final

• 6. Judge, S. & O’Bannon, B. (2008). Faculty integration of technology in teacher preparation: Outcomes of a development model.  Technology, Pedagogy and Education 17(1), 17-28. doi:10.1080/14759390701847435.

• 7. Keller, J. B., Hixon, E., Bonk, C.J. & Ehman, L.H. (2008). Professional development that increases technology integration by K-12 teachers: Influence of the TICKIT program. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distant Learning 5(3). Retrieved from http://itdl.org/Journal/Mar_08/article01.htm

• 8. Lefebvre, S., Deaudelin, C. & Loiselle, J. (2008). Teaching practices and elementary school teacher’s concepts of teaching and learning and integration of ICTs. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 34(1). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/173/169

• 9. Levin, T. & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ views on factors affecting effective integration of information technology in the classroom: developmental scenery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 16(2), 233-263. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/j/JTATE/v/16/n/2

• 10. MacDonald, R. (2009). Supporting learner-centered ICT integration: The influence of collaborative and needs-based professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 17(3), 315-348. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/j/JTATE/v/17/n/3

Page 25: 6610gibbmodule3final

• 11. Mama, M. & Hennessy, S. (2010). Level of technology integration by primary teachers in Cyprus and student engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 19(2), 269-275. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2010.491238.

• 12. Murphy, D. T. & Gunter, G. A. (1997). Technology integration: The importance of administrative support. Educational Media International 34(3), 136-139. doi:10.1080/0952398970340306.

• 13. Ping, L. C., Swe, K. M., Hew, T., Wong, P. & Shanti, D. (2003). Exploring critical aspects of information technologies integration in Singapore schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 19(1), 1-24. Retrieved from http://ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet19/lim.html

• 14. Sang, G., Valcke, M., Van Braak, J. & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education 54(1), 103-112. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010.

• 15. Velazquez, C. M. (2008). Testing predictive models of technology integration in Mexico and the United States. Computers in the Schools 24(3-4), 153-173. doi:10.1300/J025v24n03_11.