5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

16
WHAT DOES IMPROVING SHELTER LOOK LIKE? Rhode Island’s OPERATION FIRST STEP PROGRAM Jim Ryczek Executive Director, Rhode Island Coalition for the Homeless 1070 Main Street, Pawtucket, RI 02860 [email protected]

description

This workshop will explore what it means to improve shelter in the context of two critical areas; (1) measuring length of stay and using that data to improve the program; and (2) quality and effectiveness of the services offered in shelter and the degree to which they are focused on preparing clients for housing.

Transcript of 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

Page 1: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

WHAT DOES IMPROVING SHELTER LOOK LIKE?

Rhode Island’s OPERATION FIRST STEP PROGRAM

Jim RyczekExecutive Director, Rhode Island Coalition for

the Homeless1070 Main Street, Pawtucket, RI 02860

[email protected]

Page 2: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

HISTORY

WELCOME ARNOLD (A RI Revolutionary War Hero) Over 25 years RI’s Largest Congregate

Shelter; 114 Bed Capacity (for unaccompanied Men &

Women); Night-to-Night; Limited to No Effective Case Management; In June, 2006 the shelter was designated to

close and be razed to build the new RI State Police Barracks on the site;

Page 3: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

History (cont.)

Advocates objected to the replacement of Welcome Arnold with another large congregate shelter;

Advocates instead promoted community-based, scattered site apartment and/or group home model;

Intensive case management as a central component;

This resulted in a delay in the closing of Welcome Arnold until March 15, 2007;

Page 4: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

Advocacy Opportunity: The Window

Opens… Leverage existed with Governor’s press

statement: “I have pledged to ensure that every individual using that facility is accommodated before construction begins. [N]othing whatsoever will happen at Welcome Arnold until we have established a plan to ensure that we can provide for the facility’s residents going forward.”

These statements would come back to haunt him…but, not persuade him and his administration to allocate more resources.

Page 5: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

Advocacy Opportunity: The Window

Opens… We won on the new model… We did not win bringing the new model to

scale; W.A. = 114 beds in a Night-to-Night Shelter; Accommodated 297 individuals in Feb. 2007; New Operation First Step Program = 100 beds;

Several challenges emerged in implementation; First 100 beds ≠ 297 people!; Co-operation &Collaboration Issues.

Page 6: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

First 100 beds ≠ 297 people! Funding restricted to approx. what Welcome

Arnold cost = $700,000; A Decentralized, Community based model

would serve 100 clients (70 women, 30 men) at any point-in-time;

There would no longer be ANY emergency women’s shelter in the state;

The transition would happen in a 24 hr. period; Overflow would result and must be planned

for…

Page 7: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

Co-operation & Collaboration Issues

“Silo-ization”& competition for scare resources had not fomented close collaborative relationships;

Further exacerbated by philosophical issues;

Implementation Committee formed to oversee & coordinate the transition;

Made up of executive directors of 5 agencies chosen to replace W.A. with the new Operation First Step Program.

Page 8: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

Cost to the State = $3.8 Million

Page 9: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

PROGRAM AGENCIES

CROSSROADS RI Intake/Assessment

URBAN LEAGUE RI Women (younger)

AMOS HOUSE Substance free/recovery

MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATES/OASIS Mental Health

HOUSE OF HOPE CDC Women (older)

Page 10: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

GOALS OF FIRST STEP

Assess and Identify Basic Needs;

Provide Effective Case Management & Treatment Planning;

Achieve Better Stability and Sustainability;

Transition to Permanent Housing.

Page 11: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

Program Modifications

Implementation Committee was Re-organized into an ongoing Monitoring & Evaluation Committee;

E.D.s were replaced by Program Directors and those responsible for direct care/case management;

Regular weekly meeting became bi-weekly, then monthly meetings.

Page 12: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

Coordination of Services

Devise Common Policies & Protocols; Resolve Difficult Cases & Programmatic

Issues; Increase Communication &

Collaboration; Promote Intensive Client-Centered Case

Management; Promote good Treatment Planning &

Evaluation.

Page 13: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

INTENSIVE SUPPORTIVE SERVICES• Housing;• Employment;• Public Benefits;• Appropriate Referral & Follow Through

on them;• Health & Mental Health Assessment;• Reintegration;

– Family; and,– Community.

Page 14: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

CHALLENGES

100 beds in Community-based program ≠ 100 beds in a night-to-night shelter…this took us years to address;

Collaborating; Communication; Case manger training and expertise; Maintaining confidentiality.

Page 15: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

OUTCOMES

First Year: 38 % obtained permanent housing, as opposed to

11% from the shelter system; 33% increased their income from entry to exit as

opposed to 15% in the shelter system; The most recent year…thing continue to

improve: 63% obtained a positive housing placement; 79% stayed < 6 mos. 60% stayed < 3 mos. 30% stayed < 1 mo.

Page 16: 5.9 What Does “Improving Shelter” Look Like? A Discussion for Organizational Change (Ryczek)

QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? OBSERVATIONS? SUGGESTIONS?

Rhode Island’s OPERATION FIRST STEP PROGRAM

Jim RyczekExecutive Director, Rhode Island Coalition for

the Homeless1070 Main Street, Pawtucket, RI 02860

[email protected]