4.1 Quality Control

download 4.1 Quality Control

of 55

Transcript of 4.1 Quality Control

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    1/55

    Quality Control

    1

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    2/55

    Overview

    • Inspection and quality control

    -Types of Inspection, Control Charts -Introduction, Defnition, Classifcation, Types,Attributes, Variables

    • Total Quality Management- Concept, Features, Kaizen model and 7 QualityControl Tools - Procedures, Variables, Quality level

    • ecent concepts in Quality Control

    - Introduction to !i" sigma, #pproaches,$ene%ts and Types& - DAIC, DADV, !reen belt,"lac# belt, aster blac# belts$

    • Tutorial

    - 'ro(lems in control charts&%

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    3/55

    Introduction

    • Quality control &QC' includes t(e activities )ro*t(e suppliers, t(rou+( production, and to t(ecusto*ers$

    • Inco*in+ *aterials are ea*ined to *a#e sure

    t(ey *eet t(e appropriate specifcations$•  T(e uality o) partially co*pleted products are

    analy.ed to deter*ine i) production processes are)unctionin+ properly$

    /inis(ed +oods and services are studied todeter*ine i) t(ey *eet custo*er epectations$

    0

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    4/55

    QC T(rou+(out Production yste*s

    2

    3aw aterials,Parts, andupplies

    ProductionProcesses

    Products andervices

    Inputs Con)ersion *utputs

    Control C(artsand

    Acceptance Tests

    Control C(artsand

    Acceptance TestsControl C(arts

    Quality o) Inputs

    Quality o) Outputs

    Quality o) Partially Co*pleted

    Products

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    5/55

    ervices and T(eir Custo*er4pectations

    • 5ospital

    • Patient receive t(e correct treat*ents6

    • Patient treated courteously by all personnel6

    • 5ospital environ*ent support patient recovery6

    • "an#• Custo*er7s transactions co*pleted wit( precision6

    • "an# co*ply wit( +overn*ent re+ulations6

    • Custo*er7s state*ents accurate6

    8

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    6/55

    Products and T(eir Custo*er4pectations

    • Auto*a#er

    • Auto (ave t(e intended durability6

    • Parts wit(in t(e *anu)acturin+ tolerances6

    • Auto7s appearance pleasin+6

    9

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    7/55

    a*plin+

    •  T(e :ow o) products is bro#en into discretebatc(es called lots$

    • 3ando* sa*ples are re*oved )ro* t(ese lots and*easured a+ainst certain standards$

    • A rando* sa*ple is one in w(ic( eac( unit in t(elot (as an eual c(ance o) bein+ included in t(esa*ple$

    • I) a sa*ple is rando*, it is li#ely to be

    representative o) t(e lot$

    ;

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    8/55

    a*plin+

    • 4it(er attributes or variables can be *easuredand co*pared to standards$

    • Attributes are c(aracteristics t(at are classifedinto one o) two cate+ories, usually de)ective &not

    *eetin+ specifcations' or nonde)ective &*eetin+specifcations'$

    • Variables are c(aracteristics t(at can be*easured on a continuous scale &wei+(t, len+t(,etc$'$

    <

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    9/55

    i.e and /reuency o)a*ples• As t(e percenta+e o) lots in sa*ples is increased=

    • t(e sa*plin+ and sa*plin+ costs increase, and

    • t(e uality o) products +oin+ to custo*ers increases$

    •  Typically, very lar+e sa*ples are too costly$

    • 4tre*ely s*all sa*ples *i+(t su>er )ro*statistical i*precision$

    • ?ar+er sa*ples are ordinarily used w(en sa*plin+)or attributes t(an )or variables$

    @

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    10/55

    en o nspecDurin+ t(e Production

    Process• Inspect be)ore costly operations$• Inspect be)ore operations t(at are li#ely to

    produce )aulty ite*s$

    • Inspect be)ore operations t(at cover up de)ects$

    • Inspect be)ore asse*bly operations t(at cannotbe undone$

    • On auto*atic *ac(ines, inspect frst and lastpieces o) production runs, but )ew in-between

    pieces$• Inspect fnis(ed products$

    1B

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    11/55

    Central ?i*it T(eore*

    •  T(e central li*it t(eore* is= Samplingdistributions can be assumed to be normallydistributed even though the population (lot)distributions are not normal$

    •  T(e t(eore* allows use o) t(e nor*al distributionto easily set li*its )or control c(arts andacceptance plans )or bot( attributes andvariables$

    11

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    12/55

    a*plin+ Distributions•

     T(e sa*plin+ distribution can be assu*ed to benor*ally distributed unless sa*ple si.e &n' isetre*ely s*all$

    •  T(e *ean o) t(e sa*plin+ distribution & ' is eual tot(e population *ean &µ'$

    •  T(e standard error o) t(e sa*plin+ distribution &σ ' is

    s*aller t(an t(e population standard deviation &σ ' by

    a )actor o) 1

    1%

    -

    n

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    13/55

    Population and a*plin+Distributions

    10

    f(x)f(x) Population Distribution

    Sampling Distribution

    of Sample Means

    Mean = µ

    Std. Dev. = σx

    Mean = x = µStd. Error =

    =

    x

    x

    xx

    σσ =

    n

    f(x)

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    14/55

    Control C(arts

    • Pri*ary purpose o) control c(arts is to indicate ata +lance w(en production processes *i+(t (avec(an+ed suEciently to a>ect product uality$

    • I) t(e indication is t(at product uality (as

    deteriorated, or is li#ely to, t(en corrective ista#en$

    • I) t(e indication is t(at product uality is bettert(an epected, t(en it is i*portant to fnd out w(yso t(at it can be *aintained$

    • Fse o) control c(arts is o)ten re)erred to asstatistical process control &PC'$

    12

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    15/55

    Constructin+ ControlC(arts• Vertical ais provides t(e scale )or t(e sa*ple

    in)or*ation t(at is plotted on t(e c(art$

    • 5ori.ontal ais is t(e ti*e scale$

    • 5ori.ontal center line is ideally deter*ined )ro*

    observin+ t(e capability o) t(e process$•  Two additional (ori.ontal lines, t(e lower and

    upper control li*its, typically are 0 standarddeviations below and above, respectively, t(ecenter line$

    18

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    16/55

    Constructin+ ControlC(arts• I) t(e sa*ple in)or*ation )alls wit(in t(e lower

    and upper control li*its, t(e uality o) t(epopulation is considered to be in controlGot(erwise uality is Hud+ed to be out o) control

    and corrective action s(ould be considered$•  Two versions o) control c(arts will be ea*ined

    • Control c(arts )or attributes

    • Control c(arts )or variables

    19

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    17/55

    Control C(arts )orAttributes• Inspection o) t(e units in t(e sa*ple is per)or*ed

    on an attribute &de)ectivenon-de)ective' basis$

    • In)or*ation provided )ro* inspectin+ a sa*ple o)si.e n is t(e percent de)ective in a sa*ple, p, or

    t(e nu*ber o) units )ound to be de)ective in t(atsa*ple divided by n$

    1;

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    18/55

    Control C(arts )orAttributes•

    Alt(ou+( t(e distribution o) sa*ple in)or*ation )ollowsa bino*ial distribution, t(at distribution can beapproi*ated by a nor*al distribution wit( a•  *ean o) p

    • standard deviation o)

     T(e 0σ control li*its are

    1<

    -

    )/n p(100 p  −

    )/n p(100 p3 -/  p   −+

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    19/55

    4a*ple= AttributeControl C(art

    4very c(ec# cas(ed or deposited at ?incoln"an# *ust be encoded wit( t(e a*ount o) t(ec(ec# be)ore it can be+in t(e /ederal 3eserveclearin+ process$ T(e accuracy o) t(e c(ec#

    encodin+ process is o) up*ost i*portance$ I)t(ere is any discrepancy between t(e a*ount ac(ec# is *ade out )or and t(e encoded a*ount,t(e c(ec# is de)ective$

    1@

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    20/55

    4a*ple= AttributeControl C(art

     Twenty sa*ples, eac( consistin+ o) %8Bc(ec#s, were selected and ea*ined$ T(enu*ber o) de)ective c(ec#s )ound in eac( sa*pleis s(own below$

    %B

    2 1 8 0 % ; 2 8 % 0

    % < 8 0 9 2 % 8 0 9

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    21/55

    4a*ple= AttributeControl C(art

     T(e *ana+er o) t(e c(ec# encodin+depart*ent #nows )ro* past eperience t(atw(en t(e encodin+ process is in control, anavera+e o) 1$9 o) t(e encoded c(ec#s are

    de)ective$(e wants to construct a p c(art wit( 0-

    standard deviation control li*its$

    %1

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    22/55

    4a*ple= AttributeControl C(art

    %%

    σ  

    −   −= = = =

    &1 '   $B19&1 $B19'   $B18;22$BB;@09

    %8B %8B p

     p p

    n

    UCL = 3 =.016+3(.00!36)= .03!"0" or 3.!"# p

     p   σ  +

    LCL = 3 =.016-3(.00!36)=-.00"0"= 0# p

     p   σ  −

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    23/55

    4a*ple= AttributeControl C(art

    %0

     p  Chart for Lincoln Bank

    0.000

    0.005

    0.010

    0.015

    0.020

    0.025

    0.030

    0.035

    0.040

    0.045

    0 5 10 15 20

    Sample Number 

       S  a  m  p   l  e   P  r  o  p  o  r   t   i  o  n     p

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    24/55

    Control C(arts )orVariables• Inspection o) t(e units in t(e sa*ple is per)or*ed

    on a variable basis$

    •  T(e in)or*ation provided )ro* inspectin+ asa*ple o) si.e n is=

    • a*ple *ean, , or t(e su* o) *easure*ent o)eac( unit in t(e sa*ple divided by n

    • 3an+e, 3, o) *easure*ents wit(in t(e sa*ple, ort(e (i+(est *easure*ent in t(e sa*ple *inus t(elowest *easure*ent in t(e sa*ple

    %2

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    25/55

    Control C(arts )orVariables•

    In t(is case two separate control c(arts are used to*onitor two di>erent aspects o) t(e process7s output=• Central tendency

    • Variability

    • Central tendency o) t(e output is *onitored usin+ t(e

    -c(art$• Variability o) t(e output is *onitored usin+ t(e 3-

    c(art$

    %8

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    26/55

    -C(art•

     T(e central line is , t(e su* o) a nu*ber o) sa*ple*eans collected w(ile t(e process was considered tobe Jin controlK divided by t(e nu*ber o) sa*ples$

    •  T(e 0σ lower control li*it is - A3

    •  T(e 0σ upper control li*it is L A3

    • /actor A is based on sa*ple si.e$

    %9

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    27/55

    3-C(art•

     T(e central line is 3, t(e su* o) a nu*ber o) sa*pleran+es collected w(ile t(e process was considered tobe Jin controlK divided by t(e nu*ber o) sa*ples$

    •  T(e 0σ lower control li*it is D13$

    •  T(e 0σ upper control li*it is D%3$

    • /actors D1and D% are based on sa*ple si.e$

    %;

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    28/55

    0σ Control C(art /actors)or Variables

    Control ?i*it /actor Control ?i*it /actora*ple )or a*ple ean )or a*ple3an+e

    i.e n A D1 D%

    % 1$

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    29/55

    4a*ple= VariableControl C(art

    %@

     

    x Chart for eo! Cho!

    4".#

    4".$

    4"."

    50.0

    50.1

    50.2

    50.3

    0 5 10 15 20Sample Number 

         S    a    m    p     l    e

             e    a    n

    %CL

    LCL

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    30/55

    4a*ple= VariableControl C(art

    0B

    & B C ' ( )* Chart for eo! Cho!

    0.00

    0.10

    0.20

    0.30

    0.400.50

    0.+0

    0.#0

    0.$0

    0 5 10 15 20Sample Number 

       S  a  m  p   l  e   *  a  n  ,  e   *

    LCL

    %CL

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    31/55

    Acceptance Plans

    •  Trend today is toward developin+ testin+ *et(odst(at are so uic#, e>ective, and inepensive t(atproducts are sub*itted to 1BBinspectiontestin+

    4very product s(ipped to custo*ers is inspectedand tested to deter*ine i) it *eets custo*erepectations

    • "ut t(ere are situations w(ere t(is is eit(eri*practical, i*possible or unecono*ical

    • Destructive tests, w(ere no products survive test

    • In t(ese situations, acceptance plans are sensible

    01

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    32/55

    Acceptance Plans

    • An acceptance plan is t(e overall sc(e*e )oreit(er acceptin+ or reHectin+ a lot based onin)or*ation +ained )ro* sa*ples$

    •  T(e acceptance plan identifes t(e=•

    i.e o) sa*ples, n•  Type o) sa*ples• Decision criterion, c, used to eit(er accept or reHect

    t(e lot

    • a*ples *ay be eit(er sin+le, double, or

    seuential$

    0%

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    33/55

    in+le-a*plin+ Plan

    • Acceptance or reHection decision is *ade a)terdrawin+ only one sa*ple )ro* t(e lot$

    • I) t(e nu*ber o) de)ectives, c7, does not eceedt(e acceptance criteria, c, t(e lot is accepted$

    00

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    34/55

    in+le-a*plin+ Plan

    02

    Lot of % &te'

    ando'

    Sa'p*e of 

    n &te' % - n &te'

    &npet n &te'

    , , ep*ae

    Defet/ve

    n %ondefet/ve

    , Defet/ve

    ond /n Sa'p*e

    e2et Lot ept Lot

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    35/55

    Double-a*plin+ Plan

    • One s*all sa*ple is drawn initially$

    • I) t(e nu*ber o) de)ectives is less t(an or eual toso*e lower li*it, t(e lot is accepted$

    • I) t(e nu*ber o) de)ectives is +reater t(an so*e

    upper li*it, t(e lot is reHected$• I) t(e nu*ber o) de)ectives is neit(er, a second

    lar+er sa*ple is drawn$

    • ?ot is eit(er accepted or reHected on t(e basis o)

    t(e in)or*ation )ro* bot( o) t(e sa*ples$

    08

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    36/55

    Double-a*plin+ Plan

    09

    Lot of % &te'

    ando'

    Sa'p*e of 

    n1 &te' % 4 n1 &te'

    &npet n1 &te'

    1, 5 1, 1

    ep*ae

    Defet/ve

    n1 %ondefet/ve

    1, Defet/ve

    ond /n Sa'p*e

    e2et Lot

    ept Lot

    Cont/ne

    1  1, 5

    (to next */de)

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    37/55

    (1, + 5,) 5

    Double-a*plin+ Plan

    0;

     % 4 n1 &te'

    ando'

    Sa'p*e of n5 &te'

     % 4 (n1 + n5)&te'

    &npet n5 &te'

    ep*ae

    Defet/ve

    n5 %ondefet/ve

    5, Defet/ve

    ond /n Sa'p*e

    e2et Lot

    ept Lot

    Cont/ne

    (1, + 5,) 5

    (fro' prev/o */de)

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    38/55

    euential-a*plin+ Plan

    • Fnits are rando*ly selected )ro* t(e lot andtested one by one$

    • A)ter eac( one (as been tested, a reHect, accept,or continue-sa*plin+ decision is *ade$

    • a*plin+ process continues until t(e lot isaccepted or reHected$

    0<

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    39/55

    euential-a*plin+ Plan

    0@0 10 50 30 0 $0 60 0 "0 !0 100 110  150 130 

    3

    1

    5

    Un/t Sa'p*ed (n)

    6

     %'7er of Defet/ve

    $

    0

    e2et Lot

    ept Lot

    Cont/ne Sa'p*/n8

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    40/55

    Defnitions

    • Acceptance plan - a*ple si.e &n' and *ai*u*nu*ber o) de)ectives &c' t(at can be )ound in asa*ple to accept a lot

    • Acceptable uality level &AQ?' - I) a lot (as no

    *ore t(an AQ? percent de)ectives, it is considereda +ood lot

    • ?ot tolerance percent de)ective &?TPD' - I) a lot(as +reater t(an ?TPD, it is considered a bad lot

    2B

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    41/55

    Defnitions

    • Avera+e out+oin+ uality &AOQ' M !iven t(e actual o) de)ectives in lots and a particular sa*plin+plan, t(e AOQ is t(e avera+e de)ectives in lotsleavin+ an inspection station

    Avera+e out+oin+ uality li*it &AOQ?' M !iven aparticular sa*plin+ plan, t(e AOQ? is t(e*ai*u* AOQ t(at can occur as t(e actual de)ectives in lots varies

    21

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    42/55

    Defnitions

    •  Type I error - "ased on sa*ple in)or*ation, a +ood&uality' population is reHected

    •  Type II error - "ased on sa*ple in)or*ation, a bad&uality' population is accepted

    • Producer7s ris# &α' - /or a particular sa*plin+ plan,t(e probability t(at a Type I error will beco**itted

    • Consu*er7s ris# &β' - /or a particular sa*plin+plan, t(e probability t(at a Type II error will beco**itted

    2%

    C id ti i

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    43/55

    Considerations inelectin+ a a*plin+ Plan• Operatin+ c(aracteristics &OC' curve

    • Avera+e out+oin+ uality &AOQ' curve

    20

    O ti C( t i ti

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    44/55

    Operatin+ C(aracteristic&OC' Curve• An OC curve s(ows (ow well a particular sa*plin+

    plan &n,c' discri*inates between +ood and badlots$

    •  T(e vertical ais is t(e probability o) acceptin+ a

    lot )or a plan$•  T(e (ori.ontal ais is t(e actual percent de)ective

    in an inco*in+ lot$

    • /or a +iven sa*plin+ plan, points )or t(e OC curvecan be developed usin+ t(e Poisson probability

    distribution

    22

    O ti C( t i ti

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    45/55

    Operatin+ C(aracteristic&OC' Curve

    28

    $1B$1B

    $%B$%B

    $0B$0B

    $2B$2B

    $8B$8B$9B$9B

    $;B$;B

    $

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    46/55

    OC Curve &continued'• ana+e*ent *ay want to=

    • peci)y t(e per)or*ance o) t(e sa*plin+ procedure byidenti)yin+ two points on t(e +rap(=• AQ? and α 

    • ?TPD and β

    •  T(en fnd t(e co*bination o) n and c t(at provides a

    curve t(at passes t(rou+( bot( points

    29

    A O t i Q lit

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    47/55

    Avera+e Out+oin+ Quality&AOQ' Curve• AOQ curve s(ows in)or*ation depicted on t(e OC

    curve in a di>erent )or*$

    • 5ori.ontal ais is t(e sa*e as t(e (ori.ontal ais)or t(e OC curve &percent de)ective in a lot'$

    •Vertical ais is t(e avera+e uality t(at will leavet(e uality control procedure )or a particularsa*plin+ plan$

    • Avera+e uality is calculated based on t(eassu*ption t(at lots t(at are reHected are 1BB

    inspected be)ore enterin+ t(e production syste*$

    2;

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    48/55

    AOQ Curve

    • Fnder t(is assu*ption,

    AOQ πNP&A'1w(ere= π  percent de)ective in an inco*in+ lot

      P&A' probability o) acceptin+ a lot is

      obtained )ro* t(e plan7s OC curve

    • As t(e percent de)ective in a lot increases, AOQwill increase to a point and t(en decrease$

    2<

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    49/55

    AOQ Curve

    • AOQ value w(ere t(e *ai*u* is attained isre)erred to as t(e avera+e out+oin+ uality level&AOQ?'$

    • AOQ? is t(e worst avera+e uality t(at will eit

    t(e uality control procedure usin+ t(e sa*plin+plan n and c$

    2@

    Co*puters in Qualit

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    50/55

    Co*puters in QualityControl• 3ecords about uality testin+ and results li*it a

    fr*7s eposure in t(e event o) a product liabilitysuit$

    • 3ecall pro+ra*s reuire t(at *anu)acturers

    now t(e lot nu*ber o) t(e parts t(at areresponsible )or t(e potential de)ects

    • 5ave an in)or*ation stora+e syste* t(at can tie t(elot nu*bers o) t(e suspected parts to t(e fnalproduct *odel nu*bers

    •5ave an in)or*ation syste* t(at can trac# t(e*odel nu*bers o) fnal products to custo*ers

    8B

    Co*puters in Quality

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    51/55

    Co*puters in QualityControl• it( auto*ation, inspection and testin+ can be so

    inepensive and uic# t(at co*panies *ay beable to increase sa*ple si.es and t(e )reuencyo) sa*ples, t(us attainin+ *ore precision in bot(

    control c(arts and acceptance plans

    81

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    52/55

    Quality Control in ervices

    • In all services t(ere is a continuin+ need to*onitor uality

    • Control c(arts are used etensively in services to*onitor and control t(eir uality levels

    8%

    rap Fp= orld Class

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    53/55

    rap-Fp= orld-ClassPractice• Quality cannot be inspected into products$

    Processes *ust be operated to ac(ieve ualitycon)or*anceG uality control is used to ac(ievet(is$

    tatistical control c(arts are used etensively toprovide )eedbac# to everyone about ualityper)or*ance

    • $ $ $ *ore

    80

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    54/55

  • 8/18/2019 4.1 Quality Control

    55/55

    9:%;