406 MHz EPIRB False Alerts Study

24
406 MHz EPIRB False Alerts Study

description

406 MHz EPIRB False Alerts Study. EPIRB False Alerts Study. Study was research project by: Larry Yarbrough, USCG District 7 (dpi) Newton Anderson, USCG Auxiliary. Why does US Coast Guard care about EPIRB False Alerts?. 96% 406 MHz EPIRB Alerts are false - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 406 MHz EPIRB False Alerts Study

Page 1: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

406 MHz EPIRB False Alerts

Study

Page 2: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

EPIRB False Alerts Study

Study was research project by:Larry Yarbrough,

USCG District 7 (dpi) Newton Anderson,

USCG Auxiliary

Page 3: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

Why does US Coast Guard care about

EPIRB False Alerts?• 96% 406 MHz EPIRB Alerts are false• 85% Resolved by RCCs with

registration and good detective work• Projected increase in EPIRB population

will bring increase in number of false alerts

Page 4: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

Why does US Coast Guard care about

EPIRB False Alerts?• $3.6 million in A/C time and fuel on

406 MHz EPIRB false alerts in 2007 • SAR crews put at risk• SAR assets less available for actual

distress• Fatigues and dulls the SAR system

Page 6: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

EPIRB False Alerts Study

• Study data limited to:– US Registered 406 MHz EPIRBs – transmitting a 406 MHz False Alert– where secondary data collection was

accomplished, through RCC telephone interview of vessels owner or operator at the time of the alert

• Study Population came from all USMCC alerts passed to US Coast Guard RCCs

Page 7: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

EPIRB False Alerts

• 1 May - 31 Dec 2007• USMCC received 1577 406 MHz

EPIRB alerts• 5% (83) were Distress Alerts • 1494 False Alerts (non-distress and

ceased/undetermined alerts)

Page 8: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

EPIRB False Alerts

• 1494 False Alerts (non-distress and ceased/undetermined alerts)

• 15% - (232) Were False Alerts with enough data collected to develop evidence of circumstances causing alert transmission

Page 9: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

How Long does a False Alerts Last?

105 36 20 12 9 2 48

45.3%60.8%

69.4% 74.6% 78.4% 79.3%

100.0%

020406080

100120

10 20 30 40 50 60 MoreAlert Duration (in minutes)

Num

ber o

f Ale

rts

Page 10: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

EPIRB False Alerts

• 232 - False Alerts with enough data collected to develop evidence of circumstances causing alert transmission

Page 11: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

Operator Induced False Alerts

• 10% (24) were attributed to Testing without following manufactures instructions, or other deliberate non-emergency activations

• 6% (13) were EPIRBs deliberately taken out of bracket and naked of any control of the wet sensor

Page 12: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

Bracket Water Testing

04/22/2304/22/23 L. Yarbrough/D7CFVSL. Yarbrough/D7CFVS

Page 13: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

False Alert and EPIRB in Bracket

95

35

154

26 22

Wet Bumped Knocked out Icing HeavyWeather

Washing

161

Ale

rts

Page 14: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

EPIRB False Alerts69% (161) Caused by Failure of “The

bracket decoupling function” to control the EPIRB–Observed with Category I and II–Manufactures, makes and models

in the US registration data base were proportionally represented by False Alerts

Page 15: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

EPIRB False Alerts

69% (161) Activated when bracket should have prevented activation

Failure of “The bracket decoupling function” to control the EPIRB

Page 16: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

Bracket problems observed in field by Coast Guard personnel

• Loose straps or mechanical holding device

• Missing pads or guides to hold beacons in place

• Missing or corroded magnets

Page 17: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

Bracket problems observed in field by Coast Guard personal

(continued)• Beacons being placed improperly in

brackets by users• Brackets not mounted in accordance

with manufactures recommendations

Page 18: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

EPIRB Operational Requirements

Not be activated or deactivated by conditions encountered in maritime environment

69% Of False Alerts

Bracket Interface Failure

Page 19: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

False AlertsFalse Alerts are a drain on the health of

the EPIRB Distress Alerting SystemThere is no one cause of EPIRB False

Alerts, and there is no one fix for the problem However …

Several small corrective steps will make a positive difference in this problem

Page 20: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

Scrambled HexID Codes

• USMCC alerts with invalid HexID code starting with 21, 22, or 23.

• Older models of ACR EPIRBs will repeat 406 MHz transmissions if switch is left in Test Position.

Page 21: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

Scrambled example

• UNREG HEX CODE RECEIVED: 23DE1 42C01 8DC01 ADD : ADCD0 23DE1 42C01 XXXXX Look up new code in RGDB, if there happens to be a vessel

with this beacon, and it’s an ACR beacon, there is a possibility it’s a test signal that could be an EPIRB held in the test mode, and a real SAR case. This could save you a lot of time.

Page 22: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

Scrambled HexID Codes

• Code received by USMCC = 23DE1 42C01 89645

• Add ADCD0 as first 5 digits of HexID.• Drop last five (89645).• Check new code (ADCD0 23DE1 42C01)

against NOAA registration data base. • Use results from Registration Data base

with great care.

Page 23: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

Scrambled HexID Codes• Use results with Great Care.• Until you have confirmed the beacon you

identified in the RGDB:– is going off is in a location that correlates with

the A or B solution, – and there is no distress,

you must treat with the same care and concern as all other unregistered Alerts.

Page 24: 406 MHz EPIRB  False Alerts  Study

Questions?

[email protected]

(305) 415 6868

04/22/2304/22/23 L. Yarbrough/D7CFVSL. Yarbrough/D7CFVS