4) Attention
-
Upload
richard-thripp -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of 4) Attention
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
1/43
Slide 1
ATTENTIONEXP3604C
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
2/43
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
3/43
Slide 3
Selective or Divided?
An example of divided attention. The player has to attend to several things on screen at once.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
4/43
Slide 4
Selective or Divided?
The only way to reliably find Waldo is to focus attention (selectively) on the spot yourecurrently looking at while ignoring everything else
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
5/43
Slide 5
Overt or Covert?
Clearly, they are all paying attention to something up high. Theyre eyes and other bodylanguage can be used to infer what they are focusing on. This is overt attention.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
6/43
Slide 6
Overt or Covert?
Even though her eyes give her away from the front, she is being careful to prevent her bodylanguage from indicating from behind that shes listening to their conversation (covertattention)
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
7/43
Slide 7
SELECTIVE ATTENTIONFocus on one thing, ignore everything else
We selectively attend often in tasks like those pictured
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
8/43
Slide 8
Selective Attention Ignoring unwanted information
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyVjd8TpOXs
Some examples
- Al Gore can get some work done despite the distracting clutter. - The video shows what its like talking to people in a crowded convention center a difficult
place to focus your attention on the conversation youre trying to have.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
9/43
Slide 9
Filtering Tasks Dichotic Listening
Filter out some information
Shadowing Repeat 1 message aloud
We study selective attention by having people do filtering tasks.
The participant hears 2 messages 1 in each ear and is tasked with ignoring one and payingattention only to the other. This is called dichotic listening (which is a type of filtering task).
They are also instructed to shadow the message they are supposed to be selectively attendingto (i.e., to repeat it out loud see image) thats how the researcher knows they are actuallydoing the task as requested.
Later, the experimenter will ask questions about what they heard in order to study selectiveattention
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
10/43
Slide 10
Theories of Selective Attention Early Selection
Bottom up processing No meaning analyzed before consciousness
Late Selection Bottom up processing meaning is processed, but may not reach consciousness
Early selection models of selective attention filter out unwanted information shortly after it isperceived. i.e., important perceptual details are selected early (while unwanted perceptualinformation is filtered out) and the selected content gets to go further into the brain foradditional processing (e.g., the meaning of the words heard).
Late selection theories suggest that ALL the incoming perceptual information is processed, andthen meaning is processed (e.g., word meaning), and ONLY THEN does some of it get selected tomake its way into consciousness.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
11/43
Slide 11
Broadbents Filter Model An early selection model
a.k.a. A bottleneck theory
The most prominent theories of attention are collectively referred to as bottleneck theories.They all assume that a lot of information comes in from the environment, but due to ourprocessing capacity limits, only a little of this information gets processed and into consciousnessat a time.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
12/43
Slide 12
Broadbents Filter Model
1. Sensory Memory Incoming info store
E.g., visual, auditory processing
2. Filter Allows through only attended message
3. Detector Processes meaning (semantics) All info that gets through is processed
4. Short-term Memory i.e., into consciousness
One of the most prominent bottleneck theories is Broadbents filter model.
This is an early selection model.
All the sensory information from the environment comes in through our senses (stage 1), andthen is immediately filtered in stage 2 to prohibit all but the stuff we want to get through foradditional processing (i.e., we can direct our attention, and that is what determines what getsthrough).
Only then does meaning get processed (the detector in stage 3), and only after that does thisinformation make its way into our consciousness
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
13/43
Slide 13
Evidence to the Contrary Cocktail Party Effect
Processing meaning !
9
7
6
Dear
Aunt
Jane
BUT if selective attention relies on early selection of important information for furtherprocessing, then how do we explain the cocktail party effect? Imaging having a conversationat a party, focusing attention on the people in front of you and ignoring all the noise behind you,when someone on the other side of the room says your name. You notice! How can thathappen if the other information in the room isnt getting processed for meaning (as inBroadbents early selection model)?
Another example: the Dear Aunt Jane Study. During the dichotic listening task, informationlike that above (in the slide) would be presented. If the participant is tasked with listening tothe left ear, they should hear: Dear 7 Jane. But when asked later what they heard, they replyDear Aunt Jane. So the unattended information coming in from the right ear must be gettingsome processing for meaning. This isnt predicted by Broadbents early selection model it is acontradiction to that theory.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
14/43
Slide 14
Treismans Attenuation Theory Selection takes place at needed level
Example: Male vs. female voice early filtering based on sound Female vs. female voice later filtering based on
meaning
Treisman suggests a theoretical modification to allow early selection models to remain viable.She argues that we can do early selection based on stimulus surface features e.g., male vs.female voice. But if this information isnt available (e.g., 2 female voices) then it is not possibleto selectively attend based on this feature, and both voices go on for further processing. Oncemeaning is processed it becomes possible to filter from then on (i.e., filter out what you dontwant to enter consciousness and memory).
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
15/43
Slide 15
Treismans Attenuation Theory
Unattended messages are attenuated Made thinner
Attended message gets more processing Is amplified
Dictionary unit processes meaning i f needed Thresholds
Some words always get processed (Fire!, your name)
Treisman suggests that some information always gets through for meaning processing. Yourname or important words like fire always get processed. But for the most part you can limitthe processing in terms of meaning to what you want to focus on.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
16/43
Slide 16
Late Selection Models
Meaning is always processed at some level Can influence if attended to
then Which is closer to what youheard?
They threw stones towardThe side of the river
They threw stones at thesavings and loan
They threwstones at the
bank
Attended
money
Unattended
Other theorists argue that ALL incoming information first gets perceptual processing, and thengets meaning processing, and only THEN does filtering occur (i.e., late selection of informationto get into consciousness and memory)
This is demonstrated by the example study above.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
17/43
Slide 17
Attention & Cognitive Resources
Attention interacts with the amount of cognitive resources we have available at a given time.
The circles above represent the total cognitive capacity we have at our disposal. The coloredpart indicates how much of this capacity is being used by the task were primarily engaged in.So the image on the left shows that if our primary task is a low cognitive load task (i.e., an easytask), then we have a lot of cognitive capacity left to think about other things. A high cognitiveload task (right) eats up all our available resources, and we are unable to multi - task.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
18/43
Slide 18
Some real world examples. Driving on a country road or relaxing in front of the TV leavesenough resources to think about other things. Not so for biking in the city or driving and talkingon the phone.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
19/43
Slide 19
B A BA B AX C XB C BD A DX B XB D B
A C AX A X
Flanker taskRespond to A or B with left handRespond to C or D with right handRespond based on MIDDLE letter!
The flanker task is a simple experimental task designed to examine our ability to selectivelyattend. The participant is to quickly respond with their left hand if the center letter is either anA or B. If a C or D, they are to quickly respond with their right hand as they go through thesequence of letter triplets one by one (i.e., imagine each row of 3 letters is shown on the screenone at a time, and the participant is to respond as soon as they can once the letters appear)
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
20/43
Slide 20
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
e. g. , XAX, XC X e.g. ,ABA, DCD e. g. , BCB, DAD
neutral compatible incompatible
R e s p o n s e
t i m e
( m s
)
Implies early or late selection? (writeanswer)
Attention & Cognitive Resources Unintentional processing!
Response time is fastest if the letters that surround the target (center letter) are in the sameresponse category (i.e., compatible). See the middle bar in the chart.
Response time is slowest if the flankers (i.e., the letters that flank the target on each side) arefrom the opposite response category (see the right -most bar).
These results indicate that even when we try to ignore irrelevant information , it is difficult.
This argues for late selection models, since the flanker meaning is clearly being processed inorder to provide this interference.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
21/43
Slide 21
Task Irrelevant Stimuli Interfere : you process anyway!!
The Stroop task is a classic example of interference from irrelevant information.
Try naming the color of the font from each word in the list as fast as you can. Dont read thewords, just say the colors as fast as possible! (Really, try it!)
Did the word meaning slow you down? (I.e., did that automatic process of reading interferewith what you were trying to focus attention on?)
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
22/43
Slide 22
A
BO
OO
O
O
C
BO
O
O
O
O
BD O
OO
O
O
B
AP
FR
S
K
D A
J
PL
M
G
ACH
NF
QY
compatible
incompatible
incompatible
compatible
incompatible
incompatible
Cognitive Load Reduc es Interferenc e !!Flanker task: target (A,B,C, or D) in the circle, distractor alongside
Amazingly, if you make the flanker task more difficult like on the right (the participant has torespond quickly to the target that appears in the circle, although there are a lot of otherirrelevant letters) people actually experience less interference from the flanker (the letterappearing outside the circle).
Can you guess why this might happen?! (Really, try to answer this before going on)
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
23/43
Slide 23
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
compatible incompatible compatible incompatiblelow load low load high load high load
Hi-load: Flanker Interference Gone!!
These are hypothetical average response times for the 4 conditions shown in the previous slide.
Under low cognitive load (the easy task in RED), there is a big difference between compatibleand incompatible flankers (compare the height of each red bar).
In the high load conditions (YELLOW), though, the compatibility or incompatibility of the flankerbecomes irrelevant.
Why??
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
24/43
Slide 24
Some real world examples.
Along the top sitting in the bar watching a game doesnt require much of your cognitiveresources. In this case, the person could become distracted by the people celebrating behindhim.
Along the bottom playing a video game can consume most of our available resources. In thiscase, the person wouldnt be distracted by other things going on behind him.
This explains the flanker task data in the previous slide. If all your cognitive resources arealready occupied, other things in the environment cant distract us as much. In fact, we mightmiss them almost entirely. If you have a lot of free resources, you have extra capacity to noticeand be distracted by other things.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
25/43
Slide 25
Endogenous/Exogenous Attention
Endogenous Internally initiated i.e., goals
Exogenous Externally initiated i.e., environment
Attention can be directed either from internal thoughts or by external events.
In the endogenous examples, you initiate where your attention goes (find a word, findsomething in briefcase). In the exogenous example, the ball flying at your face will dictatewhere your attention is! (exogenous means an external event)
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
26/43
Slide 26
OVERT, COVERT ATTENTION
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
27/43
Slide 27
Overt Attention Obvious attention shifting
Eyes move (other parts of body?)
Saccades, fixations http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsU1Yb6wkJ0&feature=related
Eye Tracking http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lo_a2cfBUGc
Eye movements indicate where a person is focusing attention.
Eye tracking devices can be used to record where a person is looking and for how long. Fromthis we infer when and where the persons attention was! This is valuable for design and forunderstanding cognition as it unfolds in time.
Watch the videos to see examples of saccades (individual eye movements) and what can berecorded with eye tracking devices.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
28/43
Slide 28
Overt Attention Bottom-up Feature salience (prominence)
Drives attention Corners, edges
Overt attention can be driven by exogenous factors.
This is a bottom up processes (i.e., driven by the visual system, not by higher - level thoughts).Certain features are more telling than others. While looking at a face, for instance, we focusmostly on eyes and mouth this is where the most variation lies from moment to moment. Theimage on left shows eye - tracker data red means more time spent looking at these spots.
The image on the right shows the features tracked by software designed to classify the emotiona person is expressing. Notice its mostly eyes and mouth information.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
29/43
Slide 29
Overt Attention Top-down Make Tea (fill the kettle)
just in time eye movement
Endogenous goals can also exert control over where our overt attention cues (e.g., eyemovements) are directed.
When placed in this scene and asked to make tea, peoples eyes first look for the pitcher, andthen look at the faucet only when it is needed. This is opposed to planning these things out inadvance and looking back and forth to see where everything is. This indicates somethingvaluable about how attention and cognition progress over time.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
30/43
Slide 30
DIVIDED ATTENTION Attend to multiple things at once
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
31/43
Slide 31
Can we Really Divide Attention?
Sure we can
But not always!
We divide our attention all day long.
But some types of divided attention are very difficult. Can we really listen to talk radio andread at the same time (not really)? Or listen to 2 conversations at the same time (not really)?
We can rapidly switch back and fourth between tasks, but it is difficult.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
32/43
Slide 32
Automatic vs. Controlled Processing
Controlled Processing Have to think about what youre doing!
Automatic Processing Dont have to think about it
Examples?
One of the reasons were able to divide our attention between tasks is because some thingsbecome easier as we gain experience with them.
All tasks start out as controlled tasks - they require active attention to what were doing.Imagine when you were first learning to type how slow, effortful and mistake prone this was.Eventually it becomes an automatic process and you can do it without thinking about it.
In fact, thinking about what were doing too much during an automatic processing task canactually cause us to make mistakes!!
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
33/43
Slide 33
Controlled vs. Automatic
Making a sandwich likely doesnt become automatic, although if you work at Subway it mightmove in that direction!
Flying a plane likely involves a combination of controlled and automatic tasks.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
34/43
Slide 34
Divided Attention Lab Study Do 2 tasks simultaneously
Hold info in memory Look at other info (and make a decision)
7 4
8
TARGET
X R
T Y
Any target items?
A classic study of divided attention looks at our ability to do multiple things at once, especiallywhen transitioning from a controlled to an automatic task.
The participant first briefly sees the target square (which can have 1 -4 items in it), followed by along series of squares with letters and numbers. These are presented at an extremely fast rate!The task is to then decide whether any of the elements from the target square were shown inthe rapid sequence.
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
35/43
Slide 35
7 4
8
K R
M G
T U
X J
G P
W U
L A
Q C
S Z
B N
J N
W M
R 4
G P
E F
S L
E G
K X
A H
T B
(This demo works in the PPT version of these slides just use an arrow key to move through thesquares rapidly)
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
36/43
Slide 36
From Controlled to Automatic Processing
People are initially terrible at this task. In fact their performance is at chance (like a coin flip;see trial 0 in the chart).
Over a long series of trials, they actually become able to do the task, and in fact it becomeseffortless (automatic).
At that point they are very good at doing these 2 things at once holding the target in memorywhile viewing the series of items that follow it, and then making a decision. (the up arrow attrial 600 shows the point where the task probably becomes automatic)
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
37/43
Slide 37
From Controlled to Automatic Processing
Dividing attention gets easier with experience! Performance gets better!
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
38/43
Slide 38
ATTENTION & VISUALPERCEPTION
Attention can interact with what we actually perceive visually
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
39/43
Slide 39
Inattentional Blindness
Inattentional blindness means that we will not see details that appear in places where ourattention is not focused.
See the video for a classic demonstration! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pK0BQ9CUHk
This indicates that our attention is strikingly limited in scope, even though we dont realize it!!!
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
40/43
Slide 40
Inattentional Blindness If not paying attention, you can miss things in plain sight!
See next slide
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
41/43
Slide 41
Change Blindness
What is different in these 2 images?
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
42/43
Slide 42
If the images are made to overlap, and one were to toggle back and forth between them, it isimmediately obvious what the difference is between the images (a flower appears/disappearsin the bottom right portion of the image; see previous slide)
(in the PPT version of these slides, you can see the difference easily on this slide by using anarrow key to go back and forth between images)
-
8/12/2019 4) Attention
43/43
Slide 43
What does this tell us about attention? Write answers
Need focused attention to detect change (if orienting responseisnt available)
In mental representation rather than in the visual system!
http://www.youtube.com/v/vBPG_OBgTWg
The results of studies like these tell us something about how attention works.
They suggest attention is like a spotlight a narrow beam that we can point and fix on alocation or object for cognitive processing. And it is slow and effortful to move it around ascene, as opposed to some of the rapid/automatic things that the visual system does.
The video shows the now classic demonstration of change blindness actually swapping out 2different people in a conversation!!!!